Glenn Beck: Big Stamp


America's March to Socialism: Why we're one step closer to giant missile parades

is now available as an audio book...

VOICE: The Glenn Beck program presents more truth behind America's march to socialism.

GLENN: Well, when a business is in decline, any decent CEO knows there's only one thing you can do to turn things around and that's say it with me raise prices. Right? I mean, if people weren't buying, you know, at the low, low price, maybe they will take the bait on the newly jacked up price. An even better strategy is to make your product nosebleed expensive, then consumers will think the product is just so good, it has to be that good because it's so expensive.

All right, if this business logic sounds a tad flawed, guess what? You'd be correct. If you said this was the logic of the government run programs, specifically the United States Postal Service, you are super smart and you'd also be correct. Facing a $1.5 billion deficit again and mail volume falling by 7.5 billion pieces of mail, or 14%, the U.S. postal service has no other choice but to announce it's jacking up the price of stamps. Boy, doesn't it seem just like yesterday the post office said they lost a billion dollars and had to jack up the price of stamps? Actually, well, it wasn't yesterday. It was just in the third quarter of last year. And then the year before they did the same thing and the year before that as well. Big stamp has raised prices four straight years now and they still haven't figured out how to balance the budget sheets. One possible thing that they are that would explain this is maybe they are focusing on the wrong things. I mean, what actual real life company would solve the long lines checkout problem by, I'm not kidding you removing the clocks on the walls in hopes that people don't realize they've been there for a long time? That's what the postal service did in 2007. They took 33,000 clocks down off the walls. Quote: We want people to focus on the postal service and not the clock, said a postal spokesperson.

Okay. I don't think that's going to work. There is this thing in some areas of the country called a watch. Yeah. Or a clock on your cellphone. Or just a general jeez, I've been standing here for an awful long time, feeling that happens, not in all parts of the country. Only a government and a government run company with mandated by law monopolies would think like this. They are no bad that not only do the customers hate stopping by the post office, postal workers themselves have gone berserk enough times to actually have a term named after them called "Going postal." And they're worried about the clocks on the wall? How about the sniper on the roof? Does anybody doubt that FedEx would be able to turn a profit running our mail system? Not only is big stamp running a horrible company and costing taxpayers billions, big stamp is managing to tank the business and price gouge. Compare its rate increases to that of big oil over the last 90 years. The average retail price of gasoline has increased 8 1/2 times, 25.5 cents per gallon to what it is now today, $2.16 per gallon. While stamps have gone up 21 times. They were 2 cents in 1919, 44 cents as of today. If stamps increased at the rate of big oil prices, a first class stamp today would be 17 cents. If stamps increase at the rate of consumer prices, first class stamps would be 25 cents. It's so weird that big oil companies still manage to make record profits each year despite not price gouging. It's weird, isn't it? If big oil wants to improve its image in the world, perhaps it should start actually... maybe they should just start losing money. That's what the post office does. Nobody seems to have a problem with that. On the bright side, the least the federal government the least thing the federal government will do is actually run it like a business. I have a feeling, you know, they will never run it as a good business, but they will never socialize it, either. They will never completely just take, you know, take over everything like they've done the post office, then healthcare. They never do that with big oil. They would never do that, right?

VOICE: And guess what this liberal will be all about? This liberal will be all about socializing

GLENN: Wait a minute.

VOICE: Will be about... basically

GLENN: Yes?

VOICE: Taking over and the government running all of your companies.

GLENN: Oh. Okay, yeah, I take that back. It probably will do that real soon.

VOICE: Just in case you are not getting enough socialism from Washington, try Glenn's new audio book, the March to Socialism, available in bookstores everywhere tomorrow. Free copies not available as part of the stimulus package.

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.