Glenn Beck: It's us vs. them

GLENN: Did you hear Bill Maher's rant this weekend? Bill Maher got on and was saying, you know, Barack Obama, I still love him but I mean, what's the difference between him and George W. Bush? I'll tell you what the difference is and it's a huge difference: Speed. Not direction. Speed. We're going in the same direction. There wasn't a course change. There was a velocity change. That's it. Now, you can go around the edges and say, well, no, but he's doing this and he's doing that. Well, okay, there's some window dressing and there's some things that we're, you know, for instance waterboarding, that's a pretty big issue. But generally speaking we were going in that direction. We're still having that debate. It's just, you know, one's on one side, one's on the other. But it could go back the other way. You know that and I know that.

It's not real change. It's window dressing. It's not a real change. Now, understand what I'm saying, that they are not the same people and there are differences, et cetera, et cetera. But we're fighting over the scraps of freedom. George Bush was the one who started the bailouts! He was the one who said I mean, if George Bush were in office, I bet you the only difference would be the size of the stimulus package. Instead of 787, it would have been maybe 400. But remember he's the one who gave us the first $700 billion bailout in TARP. So it's not that different. Yeah, and the stimulus package before that. We're tearing each other apart, over what? We're yelling and screaming at each other that you're un American, you're this, you're that! Over what? It's a game that's being played.

You know, I'm getting a lot of heat from the mainstream media because they think that I'm speaking code language to you every day when I say it's us versus them, and I don't know when I've ever said it's us versus them. But let me explain it to the mainstream media: It's us versus them, them being the weasels in Washington that want to control things. Left, right, middle, doesn't matter. That think they know better than the average citizen. Those who want to take and gather power from themselves, for themselves.

You know there was this very telling piece of research that was done, who was it by, Rasmussen?

GLENN: It's a study from Rasmussen that talks about the people. There is, I think it's 7 or 12% of the American people that when they were surveyed, they said they trust government more than the average citizen, that they believe government and corporations have our best interests at heart, that they think that government and corporations, when they are put together, is a good thing. There's, I think it was, I can't remember. It's between 7 and 12%. Well, I contend that that 7% is the media and those in Washington. It's those people. That's them. Them, that 7% or 12%. And most of them are the ones that control the opinions on television and radio and everything else, that believe that they know better. That's a Mullah. That's the supreme council, that they will make they will just cut it down for you and they will say, "These shoes or these shoes." "I don't want to wear shoes." "No, no, that's not a choice." That's not freedom. That's Iran. That's not the system that we had here. That's the progressive system that has been created for us. That's the illusion that we're living under. It's the illusion and it's easy to see when it's in somebody else's country. That's the illusion that they are living under. It's just a more extreme version of it. But it's really not that different. And I've been watching it all weekend asking, is anyone going to say, "Who cares about the free and fair elections." The Mullahs win. The people don't win. The people think they are winning. Just like my 3 year old thought she picked her favorite shoes yesterday. No, she didn't. They weren't the ones she wanted to wear. She wanted to wear swim shoes.

STU: Even you mean the flippers?

GLENN: No, she actually, it was the actual swim shoe.

STU: Because even entertaining, like for example they were talking about coming out and saying, "Well, we're going to probe into these elections." Even entertaining the fact that they are doing that is giving it credence. It's like there's no even if they did it, it still would mean nothing. And no one's saying that.

GLENN: If they still, if they "Well, we're going to look into it." It's the corruption of their own system. And the people who are you know what that is? That's Barney Frank: "There's got to be some oversight." Who is overseeing the overseers?

Have you seen the story I'm shocked. No one is on this story yet. President Obama fired an inspector general on Thursday night. Now, inspector generals, their job is to be independent. Their job is to be the watchdog. Well, he fired him on Thursday night, said, I want your resignation or you're terminated. Well, the problem with that is is that violates the law. There's this law, and the president probably didn't know, but there is this new law that was passed and it was, you can't fire inspector generals without giving them 30 days notice and you also have to alert congress and tell them why and detail all the details on why you are firing them. Well, I shouldn't I was going to say the president shouldn't know about it. Well, the president shouldn't, but Senator Obama should know because it was Senator Obama's bill that passed that law. So he violated his own law.

Now, why would he fire this inspector general of AmeriCorps? He fires the inspector general of AmeriCorps, speculation is because this inspector general is looking into fraud, possibly perpetrated by one of Obama's good friends.

STU: This is Kevin

GLENN: Yeah, do you know this story?

STU: Yeah, this is odd this is the former basketball player Kevin Johnson in Sacramento. Yeah, and there's a lot of people charging that that's exactly what it's about.

GLENN: Yeah, it's cronyism. It's friends. Is anybody in the media besides us going to report this? Now, so he's violated his own law, he's doing it because it's a friend, good speculation that he's doing it because it's a friend. We know, we're pretty sure it's because of this case because this inspector general has kicked up a lot of dust because he's gone after this guy. And he's also going after one of the prosecutors in Sacramento because he says there's something funny going on there. This is a guy who's taken your tax dollars through AmeriCorps and spent them on things like him getting his car washed, I mean just ridiculous. And so they are saying, you know, the inspector general looked into it, wants to know what's going on with your tax dollars. That's what he does. So not only does he break the law, he broke the law for his own friend. At the same time there's something inside of the stimulus bill that nobody caught including us, nobody caught. It was put in at the last minute and now no one will answer on who put it in. But there's this new board called RAT. Why are you looking at me that way, Stu?

STU: Is it really called RAT?

GLENN: It is called RAT.

STU: Are you sure it's called RAT?

GLENN: I'm sure it's called RAT.

STU: It's your

GLENN: No, it's the RAT board. I'm sure they called it something else.

STU: I'm sure they

GLENN: No, it is. The words I can't remember what it is now. I'm looking here. Do you have it? Yeah, the Recovery Accountability and Transparency board. RAT. I swear to you.

STU: I believe you.

GLENN: The Recovery Accountability and Transparency board, RAT. So what this does is give the RAT board the authority to ask an inspector general to conduct or refrain from conducting an auditor investigation. So when Senator Obama wanted an inspector general when he was a senator, he said, totally independent, they can't answer to anybody, they cannot be called on the carpet by congress or the president. They must be independent. Now he's violated his own law and it appears that the RAT board, what a surprise, was put in by the White House, but no one will vouch for it yet. The RAT board can tell these inspector generals, "Yeah, you're going to stop looking there."

STU: What's the point of having inspector generals if you have the RAT board above them? Essentially

GLENN: What is the let me go back. What is the point of having an election when the Mullahs have already chosen?

STU: Yeah, yeah.

GLENN: It's to make you feel like you have some freedom and some power. What's going on in Washington, man, is not good.

On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Monday, Harvard Law professor and lawyer on President Donald Trump's impeachment defense team Alan Dershowitz explains the history of impeachment and its process, why the framers did not include abuse of power as criteria for a Constitutional impeachment, why the Democrats are framing their case the way they are, and what to look for in the upcoming Senate trial.

Dershowitz argued that "abuse of power" -- one of two articles of impeachment against Trump approved by House Democrats last month -- is not an impeachable act.

"There are two articles of impeachment. The second is 'obstruction of Congress.' That's just a false accusation," said Dershowitz. "But they also charge him, in the Ukraine matter, with abuse of power. But abuse of power was discussed by the framers (of the U.S. Constitution) ... the framers refused to include abuse of power because it was too broad, too open-ended.

"In the words of James Madison, the father of our Constitution, it would lead presidents to serve at the will of Congress. And that's exactly what the framers didn't want, which is why they were very specific and said a president can be impeached only for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors," he added.

"What's alleged against President Trump is not criminal," added Dershowitz. "If they had criminal issues to allege, you can be sure they would have done it. If they could establish bribery or treason, they would have done it already. But they didn't do it. They instead used this concept of abuse of power, which is so broad and general ... any president could be charged with it."

Watch the video below to hear more details:



Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

On Friday's radio program, Bill O'Reilly joins Glenn Beck discuss the possible outcomes for the Democrats in 2020.

Why are former President Barack and First Lady Michelle Obama working overtime to convince Americans they're more moderate than most of the far-left Democratic presidential candidates? Is there a chance of a Michelle Obama vs. Donald Trump race this fall?

O'Reilly surmised that a post-primary nomination would probably be more of a "Bloomberg play." He said Michael Bloomberg might actually stand a chance at the Democratic nomination if there is a brokered convention, as many Democratic leaders are fearfully anticipating.

"Bloomberg knows he doesn't really have a chance to get enough delegates to win," O'Reilly said. "He's doing two things: If there's a brokered convention, there he is. And even if there is a nominee, it will probably be Biden, and Biden will give [him] Secretary of State or Secretary of Treasury. That's what Bloomberg wants."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.


On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Friday, award-winning investigative reporter John Solomon, a central figure in the impeachment proceedings, explained his newly filed lawsuit, which seeks the records of contact between Ukraine prosecutors and the U.S. Embassy officials in Kiev during the 2016 election.

The records would provide valuable information on what really happened in Ukraine, including what then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter were doing with Ukrainian energy company, Burisma Holdings, Solomon explained.

The documents, which the State Department has withheld thus far despite repeated requests for release by Solomon, would likely shed light on the alleged corruption that President Donald Trump requested to be investigated during his phone call with the president of Ukraine last year.

With the help of Southeastern Legal Foundation, Solomon's lawsuit seeks to compel the State Department to release the critical records. Once released, the records are expected to reveal, once and for all, exactly why President Trump wanted to investigate the dealings in Ukraine, and finally expose the side of the story that Democrats are trying to hide in their push for impeachment.

"It's been a one-sided story so far, just like the beginning of the Russia collusion story, right? Everybody was certain on Jan. 9 of 2017 that the Christopher Steele dossier was gospel. And our president was an agent of Russia. Three years later, we learned that all of that turned out to be bunk, " Solomon said.

"The most important thing about politics, and about investigations, is that there are two sides to a story. There are two pieces of evidence. And right now, we've only seen one side of it," he continued. "I think we'll learn a lot about what the intelligence community, what the economic and Treasury Department community was telling the president. And I bet the story was way more complicated than the narrative that [House Intelligence Committee Chairman] Adam Schiff [D-Calif.] has woven so far."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Carter Page, a former advisor to Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, found himself at the center of the Russia probe and had his reputation and career destroyed by what we now know were lies from our own intelligence system and the media.

On the TV show Thursday, Page joined Glenn Beck to speak out about how he became the subject of illegal electronic surveillance by the FBI for more than two years, and revealed the extent of the corruption that has infiltrated our legal systems and our country as a whole.

"To me, the bigger issue is how much damage this has done to our country," Page told Glenn. "I've been very patient in trying to ... find help with finding solutions and correcting this terrible thing which has happened to our country, our judicial system, DOJ, FBI -- these once-great institutions. And my bigger concern is the fact that, although we keep taking these steps forward in terms of these important findings, it really remains the tip of the iceberg."

Page was referencing the report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, which revealed that the FBI made "at least 17 significant errors or omissions" in its Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications for warrants to spy on Page, a U.S. citizen.

"I think this needs to be attacked from all angles," Glenn said. "The one angle I'm interested in from you is, please tell me you have the biggest badass attorneys that are hungry, starving, maybe are a little low to pay their Mercedes payments right now, and are just gearing up to come after the government and the media. Are they?"

I can confirm that that is the case," Page replied.

Watch the video clip below for a preview of the full-length interview:

The full interview will air on January 30th for Blaze TV subscribers, and February 1st on YouTube and wherever you get your podcast.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.