Glenn Beck: Dancing with the Czars!



Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Webcam, an exclusive feature available only to Glenn Beck Insiders. Learn more...

GLENN: And here's my favorite. Let's get to can we dance with the czars for just a second, please?

(Music playing).

GLENN: I love the fact that we can get to know them. They're fantastic. Stu, do you like the czars that we've met so far?

STU: They are fantastic.

GLENN: And they are wonderful dancers so far. Who is your favorite dancer?

STU: Van Jones.

GLENN: Why do you like him so much?

STU: I believe it was the acrobatic nature of his routine will

GLENN: Really? What did you like about Van Jones, Pat?

PAT: Did a mean zomba, mean zomba.

GLENN: It didn't bother you that he was a full fledged communist?

PAT: No, that was way in the past.

GLENN: That was Rodney King, that was after Rodney King.

STU: That was like the 1890s, 1790s? You are saying it was the 1790s?

GLENN: No, it was the 1990s that Rodney and then he went to jail and then he became a radical Marxist and then he became a communist and then he went to work on streets, you know, in like community organizations and, you know, to try to

PAT: I haven't heard them say this but I'm sure that he's completely beyond the communist thing now. I'm sure he is.

GLENN: Well, no, he did. He moved on. He said

PAT: He moved on.

GLENN: He found the green movement.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: So he went from the red to the green movement.

STU: He went to the jobs movement, and I think the jobs movement is the appropriate place for him to be.

PAT: And you know, I mean, if there's anybody with a background that you can trust, it's communists in creating jobs.

GLENN: That's true.

PAT: There's complete full employment.

GLENN: You know what, you are turning me around. You know what, let's dance with another czar here.

PAT: All right.

GLENN: Let's meet the new czar. This one is Cass Sunstein. He is fantastic. He was a professor at the University of Chicago law school. Hey, wasn't that where our president was a

PAT: Yes, uh huh.

GLENN: That is fantastic. You know what's great? It's almost this administration is almost like family. I don't know why I think of families, when I think of Chicago, mob comes to mind. But it's like a family. You know what I mean? The Chicago law school is there and he's like, hey, you are fantastic. He is a prolific author, and he has written so many answers on the questions of law and policy, and they are not expecting him to have any problem. Quote, easily confirmed by the Senate. And this is going to be fantastic because this guy has supported the cost benefit analysis. This is the practice of examining regulations to ensure that the benefit to society outweighs whatever costs they impose.

For instance, the Bridge to Nowhere, let's do the cost benefit analysis. Wouldn't you say, Stu?

STU: Works perfectly with a bridge.

GLENN: Exactly right. The cost benefit of the bridge. It doesn't why would we spend all of this money on this bridge? There's not enough people that use it.

STU: It works perfectly on everything, of course, except for global warming, which you should never do. Never do a cost benefit analysis on global warming. Because that's just moral. But everything else you should definitely like people dying because they're not worth enough to society, that's

GLENN: Well, he does have this. He thinks that the amounts of arsenic in water, he's written about this. Standards set at 3 parts per billion would save more lives than a standard set at 10 parts per billion but it would also cost more to achieve and that cost will, in turn, be passed on to customers in their water bills. If it could be shown that the more stringent standard would result in saving 10 lives per year, how much would society be willing to pay to achieve that? $10 million, $100 million, a billion?

STU: So you are saying this guy wants people to live.

GLENN: He wants people to live. That's what he's doing.

STU: There's nothing wrong with that.

GLENN: He's saying how much is a human life worth. That's what he's saying, how much is a human life worth.

STU: Because he wants lives.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Like save or creating lives.

GLENN: For instance hmmm? For instance, he's written in support of what some people call the senior death discount, and he supports this. He's written several articles in support of this. And this is a practice taking into account the years of life expectancy when evaluating a regulation.

STU: Yeah.

PAT: So if you are 74, for instance, then you wouldn't be as worth saving as somebody who was 22 and lived near something that was toxic.

GLENN: Let's use something that's not so hate driven here. Let's say there's a toxic waste dump and they find it underneath a senior citizens home. Then they find another identical toxic waste dump underneath a playground. The toxic waste dump is worth taking out under the playground but not under the senior citizens home because children have more life expectancy than the old people do.

PAT: Well, that makes sense because if you are going to die anyway by the time you are 75 and there's a toxic waste dump, the toxic waste may not even kick in until you're dead already.

GLENN: No, but see, what would happen here already is you have then old people, their life not being worth as much.

STU: Well, it's not just the life. It's quality of life. For example, if you are on a playground and this toxic waste, you know, slows you down, makes your muscles, your innards disintegrate, you wouldn't be able to use the slide. You wouldn't be able to climb to the top of the ladder.

GLENN: Yeah, but neither would the

STU: You wouldn't be able to work on the jungle gym, where if you are old, you are not doing anything. I mean, you are just sitting there in a home.

GLENN: I think the other side would be that you should, you know, value life is life.

PAT: Have you ever been to a nursing home?

GLENN: I have.

PAT: A lot of people living there don't even want to. They might be glad there's a toxic waste dump outside.

GLENN: So are you equating that kind of like millionaires have so much money that they don't even they won't even notice?

STU: They are not even going to miss the money if it's gone.

GLENN: So you are saying that we won't enemies old people or old people won't miss living?

PAT: Both.

STU: Well, society won't miss old people.

PAT: Right.

STU: Society will miss jungle gyms.

PAT: They won't have to go to the rest room anymore.

GLENN: Hang on a second. Isn't there something for the individual?

STU: You are saying the individual rung on jungle gym?

GLENN: It sounds like you guys are making the case for a collective.

STU: Well, society is what's most important, I think. I mean, if you look, there's one existence where you're in bed.

GLENN: By the way, we're just practicing. So when all of this comes true we know exactly how to blend in and we can we're just practicing. Go ahead. So anyway, you were saying?

STU: So I'm saying old people are just in bed. I mean, think about swings. Think about tether ball.

GLENN: Okay, okay, you've convinced me on the whole "Old people are worth less than children."

PAT: Good. Okay.

GLENN: You've convinced me on that.

PAT: All right.

GLENN: Now, help me out with this one because he's also a very big, he's a very big animal rights guy, okay? In fact, John Cornyn from Texas says he's not convinced that he's not going to push for radical animal rights agenda. But Sunstein said that, you know, he promises he won't.

STU: Oh, he promised?

GLENN: Yeah, he promised he won't. What he won't do is he would like to establish, and he's written about this, he would like to establish legal rights for livestock, wildlife, and pets. And that would enable animals to file lawsuits in American courts.

STU: Finally.

GLENN: Hang on just a second. Wait a minute. I think this is a bad idea. What do you mean finally?

STU: Of course you think it's a bad idea. I mean, you've routinely criticized cats for their role in our society.

GLENN: What would make you say that? Would you say the literally 8,000 letters that we received about me saying that if you have too many cats, you should be picked up by Homeland Security and that I hate cats and all dogs should eat cats?

STU: Exactly. I mean, you'd be one of the first targets of the lawsuit. I think, though, the first would be if you've ever seen the, every year they do the ugliest dog contest. I mean, that's hateful. I mean, this dog is just trying to make it through life and, yeah, it might not might not fit society's

GLENN: So are you saying we're hurting the feelings of what about, like, if you have a pet? Can you have a pet? I mean, what if you had a pet and then somebody said, I'm going to sue you because you have a pet and your dog's like perfectly happy. I mean, we treat my dog well. Are you saying that he should be able to be represented in court by somebody who's suing me so he could be liberated?

STU: I certainly wouldn't call him a pet. I mean, if there's some consensual arrangement. I mean, I don't know if

GLENN: You are not forced to sign a pen I mean sign a contract or anything.

STU: There's a paw, a paw print, talking a very specific paw print. The paw print is different for every dog. I don't know why are you talking about some forced arrangement? What country do we live in here?

GLENN: No. I'm just saying that I mean, I'm just saying that I don't think he should be able to bring lawsuits up against hunters for going to hunt an animal.

STU: Oh, because, you know, you should just be able to just shoot things. Oh, and I suppose that means you are supposed to have a right to a gun as well.

GLENN: So this is our new could we have our Dancing With the Czar, please? Because I think we've gotten to know him...

PAT: Pretty well.

GLENN: Pretty well. This is the new guy. He is, again, Cass Sunstein, Cass Sunstein. What a surprise, he's also a visiting professor at Harvard. If I hear "Harvard" or "Chicago" one more time, I think I'm going to hang myself.

PAT: I have to say I think this guy's solving two problems in one.

GLENN: What do you mean?

PAT: He's obviously an animal rights guy. So we're going to be protecting animals from being brutally killed and cooked and eaten by human beings. So that's going to lessen the food supply. But what we do is supplement that by recycling old people.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh. I never thought of that.

PAT: Have you ever see?

GLENN: Seriously, seriously.

PAT: Do you not remember?

GLENN: Let's think about this. Of course I remember.

PAT: Soylent Green.

VOICE: People. Soylent Green. Soylent Green is people!

PAT: This could be

GLENN: I think Charlton Heston said it best.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: When he said, "It's people."

VOICE: Soylent Green, made out of people.

GLENN: By a czar.

VOICE: Soylent Green is people!

GLENN: I think you are exactly right. I think that's great. And if we could have a side of old person along with a really expensive piece of ham that the government has, wouldn't that be great? Seriously, and all of the animals will start to talk in a Disney sort of way.

STU: The ham thing has been debunked, though.

GLENN: Oh, it has?

STU: Yes. They have reported specifically that they paid double the price that you could get at any grocery store and

GLENN: That's not debunking it.

STU: It wasn't like one piece of ham paid millions of dollars. They just paid double the price of the special at Food Lion.

GLENN: That doesn't sound like that's debunking of it to me. Is that a debunking of it, Pat?

STU: I'm saying that when you know government savings they are always talking about they are going to have in healthcare. Well, this is an example of it. Instead of paying 50 million times the price, they only paid double. That's savings.

GLENN: The world is upside down, man. How is it? How is it? You know what? Everybody sees it now. Everybody sees it. If you don't see it, we should make you into old people food. We should hang you in some sort of an IV bag in a nursing home that's built on a toxic waste dump. If you don't see what's going on right now, this has nothing to do with Common Sense. This is way beyond. Way beyond. This is a transformation of our country and an overwhelming of the system, what I believe to intentionally collapse it.

Okay, did I just say that out loud?

The Senate Judiciary Committee was set to vote on subpoenas to compel Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to testify on alleged censorship and bias across their platforms. But that all changed when Republican committee members "expressed reservation about the maneuver," Politico reports.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who chairs Judiciary's Subcommittee on the Constitution, was definitely not one of the committee members with cold feet. On the radio program Tuesday, he told Glenn Beck that he's fighting "vociferously" to ensure Dorsey and others testify before the November 3rd election.

"Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg are both going to testify. They're are going to testify in person. They're going to testify before Election Day. That's what I think should happen," Cruz said. "That's what I'm fighting vociferously to happen. Right now, the companies are negotiating with the chairman's office to discuss terms to come voluntarily. I don't give a damn whether they come voluntarily or under subpoena. They need to testify in person and answer questions for the American people about why they are trying to steal this election, to suppress the free speech, and to censor the press."

The subpoenas would require Big Tech leaders to testify on the alleged "suppression and/or censorship" of two consecutive blockbuster stories from the New York Post. The first story was about emails that allegedly came from Hunter Biden's computer which are currently being investigated by the FBI, and the second was based on additional emails that allegedly showed communist China directly offering millions of dollars to then-Vice President Joe Biden.

"Big Tech stepped in, and they've done something they've never done before," Cruz explained. "We know that Big Tech has been censoring individual conservatives, trying to suppress conservative speech. But the step they took here is, they blocked if any individual user tried to share either of the New York Post stories, [they] were blocked ... Sharing a news story, from a major media outlet is part of democracy, part of free speech. And not only that, they blocked the New York Post itself. Right now, today, the New York Post is not being allowed to post its own damn stories on corruption. This is ridiculous. It's a threshold that's never been crossed before, of Silicon Valley oligarchs declaring the authority to determine what the press is allowed to report, and who is allowed to see it."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

If we learned nothing from the media over the past 4 years it's that colluding with a foreign entity to either win an election or for personal gain is absolutely grotesque. Well, that depends on whether you have a (D) or (R) before your name anyway. President Trump was impeached on rumor and innuendo yet Joe Biden has all but skated on his corruption up to this point.

Below is a timeline that shows the level of corruption and the lengths the Biden's went to in order to build that family's wealth and influence internationally.

2009

In 2009, Joe Biden was the brand-new Vice President and John Kerry was a U.S. Senator. Just five months after Joe was sworn in, his son Hunter, and Kerry's stepson, Christopher Heinz, formed an international private equity firm called Rosemont Capital. It had several different branches, including one called Rosemont Seneca Partners.

2010

Just nine months after Rosemont Seneca opened its doors, Hunter Biden went to China for meetings with executives from China's biggest banks, and its sovereign wealth and social security funds. That's unheard-of access for a brand-new firm. Was it just coincidence that at the same time Hunter was meeting these Chinese bigwigs, his dad was meeting with China's then-president Hu Jintao in Washington DC at a nuclear security summit?

2011

In May 2011, Joe Biden met with Chinese officials for the U.S.-China Strategic & Economic Dialogue conference in Washington. Just two weeks later, Hunter Biden went to Taiwan for meetings with the same Chinese financial giants he'd met in China in 2010, plus some new ones.

2013

By December 2013, Joe Biden was enjoying his second term as VP, and John Kerry was now Secretary of State. That's when Joe traveled to Beijing on an extended official trip and Hunter traveled with him on Air Force Two.

During their stay, Vice President Biden met with President Xi and Hunter was mostly out of sight. We don't know exactly what he was up to, but the deal finalized between Rosemont Seneca and the Bank of China just ten days after the Bidens' trip pretty much gives it away. The most powerful financial institution in China formed a joint venture with tiny Rosemont Seneca to create a giant new investment firm called Bohai Harvest RST – the "RS" stands for Rosemont Seneca.

The firm is often called "BHR" for short.

Hunter Biden was a member of the Board. Remember, the Bank of China is government-owned, which means its business is completely intertwined with the goals of the Chinese Communist Party. BHR also got the freedom to operate in the newly created Shanghai Free-Trade Zone where, over the next six years, it would use $2.5 billion of Chinese government money to invest in China, as well as in other countries, including the U.S.

During their Beijing trip, Hunter also introduced Jonathan Li to his dad. Li is Hunter's business partner – he's CEO and Director of BHR.

Hunter arranged for Joe to meet Li in the lobby of the hotel where they stayed during their Beijing trip.

2014

In 2014, one of BHR's first major investments was in the China General Nuclear Power Corporation.

CGN is a Chinese government-owned nuclear power company that sold off a stake of the company to outside investors. Problem is, CGN was under FBI investigation for paying informants in the U.S. to steal nuclear secrets.

In 2016, the FBI arrested the ringleader of this nuclear espionage, a man named Allen Ho.

When they arrested Ho, he was using a random code generator to access funds being provided to him from – where else? – the Bank of China.

Yet while this FBI probe was going on, the son of the Vice President owned a stake in the company being investigated. And even after arrests were made, Rosemont Seneca did not alter its relationship with BHR, nor did it divest from CGN, even though it was stealing U.S. nuclear secrets.

2015

In 2015, BHR partnered with the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) to buy an American company called Henniges for $600 million.

AVIC is a gigantic military contractor in China – think Lockheed Martin – that makes fighter jets, bombers and drones. BHR bought 49% of Henniges and AVIC bought 51%.

Henniges is a precision parts manufacturer specializing in anti-vibration technology. The stuff they make is known as "dual use" by the U.S. State Department, which means the technology can also have a military application.

Because of that, the deal had to be approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) since it could have national security implications. The thing is, the American side of BHR – meaning Hunter Biden and his pals – had to know there were serious national security implications with AVIC.

The year before they formed a partnership with AVIC, the Wall Street Journal reported how AVIC stole technology related to the U.S. Air Force's F-35 stealth fighter and used it in its own stealth fighter for the Chinese.

How the Committee on Foreign Investment approved that deal remains a mystery. CFIUS does not publicly disclose any information regarding its decisions. Their findings are not publicly announced.

Interesting that China accounted for the largest share – with 74 transactions – approved by CFIUS during Obama's second term (2013-2015).

Under the umbrella of Rosemont Capital was a real estate company called Rosemont Realty. In 2015, a Chinese company called Gemini Investments bought a 75% stake in Rosemont Realty. The company was renamed Gemini Rosemont

Gemini brought $3 billion to the partnership with Rosemont, with the aim of buying "Class A institutional-quality commercial office properties in U.S. markets."

Red flag (literally) – Gemini Investments is a subsidiary of the China Ocean Shipping Company, a.k.a., "COSCO."

COSCO is a Chinese government-owned company. Its headquarters in Beijing is actually next to the headquarters of the Bank of China. COSCO is well-known for its close military ties. It's essentially a branch of the Chinese Navy.

2017

In 2017, BHR invested in Face++. That's the facial recognition phone app built by a Chinese company that is incorporated in a separate app built by the Chinese government. Police in the Xinjiang [Sin-jong] region of China use that app to keep tabs on citizens, and track and detain Uiguhr [Wee-ger] Muslims.

The app allows police easy access to data about Chinese Muslims including things like religious activity, blood type, and even the amount of electricity they use.

2018

In March 2018, a spokesman (Chris Bastardi) for Christopher Heinz (John Kerry's stepson) emailed The Hill to say that Heinz had "no operating role" in Rosemont Seneca, and that he was not involved in any of Rosemont's deals in China (which contradicts Schweizer's report in his book Secret Empires).

Chris Heinz was involved in Rosemont Capital. Rosemont Seneca was established under the same GP as Rosemont Capital, but Chris Heinz had no operating role in it. Chris and his family have no financial interest or investment in Bohai Harvest RST, he has never traveled to China, and he has never met with the firm's Chinese management team or investors.

2019

In October 2019, Hunter Biden's lawyer, George Mesires, said Hunter did not conduct any business on that 2013 trip to Beijing with his Dad.

Mesires said the timing of BHR's business license getting approved was purely coincidental because the paperwork had been submitted months before the Bidens' China trip.

According to Hunter's lawyer, the approval " was not related in any way, shape or form to Hunter's visit."

Hunter Biden finally stepped down from the BHR board last October (2019), but he DID NOT give up his 10% stake in the company.

When Bevan Cooney — the former "junior" business partner to Hunter Biden and Devon Archer — went to jail in 2019, investigative reporter and New York Times bestselling author Peter Schweizer thought he'd never gain access to the damning emails Cooney had promised. That all changed three weeks ago when Schweizer was given complete access to Cooney's gmail account.

Schweizer joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Tuesday to describe just some of the business deals revealed within these emails — like Hunter working with an alleged Russian criminal and with Chinese communists to secure their assets, or to secure one-on-one time with his dad, then-Vice President Joe Biden. And all of this new information is completely separate from the emails allegedly discovered on Hunter Biden's laptop recently reported by the New York Post.

"So, I want to make this clear. This [Cooney's emails] has nothing to do with what's on the laptop … It didn't come from [Rudy] Giuliani. It didn't come from anybody else, right?" Glenn asked Schweizer.

"That's absolutely correct," Schweizer confirmed.

He briefly explained how Cooney, a former Los Angeles nightclub owner, is currently serving a prison sentence for his involvement in a fraudulent business bond scheme with Biden and Archer. From prison, Cooney gave Schweizer written permission to access his Gmail account.

"This is really important," he noted. "We're not looking at printouts. Not looking at PDFs. We're actually in his Gmail accounts themselves, sifting through these emails. And there's a shocking amount of information about deals involving China, involving Russia, involving all sorts of things they were trying to pull off."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The king of "No Spin" and bestselling author of "Killing Crazy Horse," Bill O'Reilly joined Glenn Beck on this week's podcast to talk about the latest developments in Joe Biden's Ukraine and China corruption scandal. Now that some of the details are finally coming out in the open, does the average Democrat care? Maybe, but the Left doesn't seem to.

O'Reilly argued there's more hatred for President Donald Trump now than in 2016, and that some people hate President Trump so much that they'd rather vote for the "senile, corrupt" Joe Biden.

"Hunter got tens of millions of dollars from Ukraine, from Russia, from China because his father was vice president. I have no doubt in my mind," O'Reilly said. "But the hatred for Donald Trump overrides that in the minds of millions of viewers. They're saying, 'You know, we'd rather have the senile corrupt guy than Trump.'"

Asked by Glenn if any other Republican running for president would be met with the same level of vitriol, O'Reilly answered, "The Left is the Left. They don't like America. The want to redo the Constitution. They want to take some of our freedoms, like the Second Amendment and the First Amendment, and change them. And they want to destroy capitalism and replace it with a big centralized government in Washington that controls the economy … but I'm talking about the folks. I have liberal friends and I say to them, 'Do you not understand that when you vote for Biden, you're voting against your own self interest?'"

Watch the video clip from the full podcast below, or find the full episode HERE:

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.