Glenn Beck: Al Gore on courts in England



Related Video

GLENN: Oh, we're getting there. Did you see where they do we have the audio of Al Gore and the whole

PAT: And the whole thing?

GLENN: Yeah. Let me play just a little bit of Al Gore. Now, remember this is in a room full of journalists, okay? This isn't like, yeah, well, I just buy my ticket because I just love Al Gore. This is journalists that he's speaking to and asking questions of. Here you go.

VOICE: Judge in the British high court after a lengthy hearing find there were nine significant errors. This has been shown to children, have you do you accept this

GLENN: Hold on just a second. Hold on just a second. Don't you think that English and Irishmen can just say anything and it's just so charming?

STU: And smart, too. It always sounds very smart.

GLENN: Well, no, the Irish don't sound smart.

STU: I disagree.

GLENN: No. English sound smart. Irish are just charming. It's like

STU: Yeah, the Lucky Charms guy doesn't sound smart.

GLENN: No, he doesn't.

STU: He does know where the lucky are but

GLENN: No, he doesn't know where they are: What have you done with my Lucky Charms, who's stealing my Lucky Charms. He doesn't even know what happened to his Lucky Charms.

STU: Is that how it goes?

GLENN: Yes.

STU: Isn't that the Hamburglar? I think it

GLENN: I don't know. They may be related. I don't know.

PAT: Either that or the bunny with the Trix bunny.

GLENN: Trix are for kids.

PAT: Yeah.

STU: That guy's just crazy.

GLENN: Get your hands off me Lucky Charms, that's what he says, I think.

STU: Is that I don't think he says that at all.

GLENN: I remember those cereal commercials now apparently being very violent. Get your hands off me Lucky Charms before I chop them off!

STU: It's not a serial coup. It was a charming commercial.

GLENN: It's cereal, man. Relax! It's a stale marshmallow. That's all it is. So they're not smart per se or don't sound smart. They just sound charming.

STU: They are always after me Lucky Charms.

GLENN: And they're paranoid.

STU: It's more of a black helicopter thing.

GLENN: No, they are. We're going to listen now to a guy who thinks that they're always after his breakfast cereal. Of course that's what Al Gore should have said to this guy. Really? Yeah. You come from a country where everybody thinks they're after your breakfast serial all the time when you can buy plenty at the store.

STU: That actually is better than the argument he came up with.

GLENN: It is.

STU: It is.

GLENN: Okay, go ahead. Here's the question.

VOICE: Judge in the British high court after a lengthy hearing find there were nine significant errors. This has been shown to children. Do you accept those findings and have you done anything to correct those errors?

GORE: Well, I'm not going to go through all of those. The ruling was in favor of the movie, by the way, and the ruling was in favor of showing the movie in schools and

GLENN: Can we stop for a second? Can we stop for a second? Hang on. Stu, didn't we talk to Lord Butterwick or whatever the hell his name was?

STU: Monckton, Lord Monckton.

PAT: Lord Butterwick was very close to Monckton, though.

GLENN: Yeah. Did we talk to him? He was the guy who did this lawsuit.

STU: Yes.

GLENN: Didn't they pull this movie from the schools?

STU: I believe that I I'm testing my memory here.

PAT: That was my understanding, too.

STU: What I remember of it is they had to either not show or correct those nine things.

GLENN: Right.

STU: What I believe, they had to there's supplemental material that had to go along with it or something.

PAT: When he says, it was in favor of the movie, by the way, I mean, that's not accurate, is it?

STU: No, I don't no, I would say that's not accurate.

GLENN: That was a pretty good imitation of him.

STU: That was better than I thought you could do.

GLENN: Go ahead.

PAT: What? I'm actually receiving praise from the two of you? I shan't be doing it anymore.

STU: It's an expectations game, Pat.

PAT: Now the expectations are higher and now I'm not going to do it. So, yeah.

STU: Because we know you do a great Yoda and we know you do a great Arlen Specter and then occasionally you'll jump into one that we think is going to be really good and then it's not there.

PAT: See, now you think it's going to be good. So

GLENN: Okay, tell me, how would Yoda have answered this question?

PAT: What was the question again?

GLENN: The question is the courts in England said that there were nine factual errors, and there were pretty big errors.

PAT: Errors there were not. Ask me this you won't anymore, yes?

GLENN: Is this a Jedi mind trick?

PAT: Believe my movie you do, yes, yes. Afraid you will be if ask me again you do, hmmm? Yes? Yes. I think that's what

GLENN: That's when I look at him and go, your Jedi mind trick doesn't work on me.

PAT: It would work on Al Gore, please.

GLENN: All right. So anyway, so here's Al Gore. He goes off on some answer that doesn't make any sense. Go ahead.

GORE: The ruling was in favor of the movie, by the way. The ruling was in favor of showing the movie in schools and that's really the bottom line on that. There's been such a long discussion of each one of those specific things. One of them, for example, was that polar bears, if I remember correctly, it's been a long time ago were that polar bears really aren't endangered. Well, polar bears didn't get that word. So

GLENN: Stop, stop, stop. Polar bears?

STU: Yeah, his defense is just to make a joke and not address the actual clip.

PAT: This is unbelievable.

GLENN: That is what the White House is doing right now! That's what they are doing to Fox News! That's what's happening! This is the way they do it. They make it into a joke. They don't actually say anything. And then they smear. And then when that doesn't work, they just shut you down. Oh, let's see if he does all of those things.

VOICE: Well, the number of polar bears have increased actually.

GORE: You don't think they're endangered, do you?

GLENN: Stop, stop.

PAT: The answer to that is no.

GLENN: It doesn't matter!

PAT: But the answer is, no, they are not endangered.

GLENN: They're not endangered. The number has increased.

PAT: Five times.

STU: Five times.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: So now he's saying, well, you don't think it is? It doesn't matter what I think it is. Let's stick to the facts.

STU: Right. I mean, you know, it's such a he just keeps pointing out here that they have gone literally from 5,000 to 25,000. It's gone the opposite direction in the last 35, 40 years?

PAT: Something like that.

GLENN: You know what's in danger is if you protect the little polar bear anymore, the little baby seals that you won't let me club

PAT: Are all going to be eaten.

GLENN: All going to be eaten. I swear to you you have to do this to if you have small children, you must start the indoctrination early.

STU: This is not good advice.

GLENN: This is great advice. I give my kids, I give my kids a baby seal hug every night and then they come up to me and then they put their arms around me and they slap my shoulders and they go, rrrrrrr, and then I whisper in their ear, who eats baby seals? And then they say, polar bears. And then I go rrrr, and then I wrestle them to the ground. I want them to know from birth, polar bears eat cute cuddly baby seals. They're bears. It's fantastic. Start the indoctrination early because the other side is. All right, go ahead.

GORE: You don't think they are endangered, do you? Do you think they are endangered?

VOICE: The number of polar bears have increased. If the number of polar bears increase, surely they are not endangered. A judge did a lengthy hearing

VOICE: We have to move on.

VOICE: No, I mean Vice President Gore hasn't, vice president

VOICE: We're not doing a debate here.

VOICE: No, answer the question. He hasn't answered the question.

VOICE: We have 10 minutes left for these people.

VOICE: I would appreciate his answer to the

PAT: Then they cut his mic off, yeah.

GLENN: Then they cut his mic. Now, there was no one in a sea of journalists that stood up and said, excuse me, he didn't answer the question. Answer the question and then we can move on. How is it these journalists can sit here, laugh when somebody says, can you imagine if I said, if I said, you know, progressives are an endangered species. No, there seems to be more and more progressives every day. So you think the progressives are an endangered species? No, I really don't. (Laughing). Who would sit there, who would sit there until the audience and say, no, wait a minute, hang on just a second. Do you have any evidence? Do you have any evidence that progressives are endangered species? Do you have any evidence that what you're saying is true?

STU: You notice he doesn't at any point say that the polar bears have not increased in their population five times.

GLENN: Right. Nowhere does he state any fact.

STU: No. He just makes a joke and then tries to shut the guy up, try to make him look like an idiot when he won't even address the fact what the guy's saying which is that there's been a large increase in the polar bears. Remember, too, that even if all this stuff were to happen, far more polar bears die because of hunting and eating polar bears is somewhat common in certain regions. These things, if you wanted to protect polar bears, you could address that side of it if you wanted to. But, of course

GLENN: I want to go on a polar bear hunt.

STU: That still occurs.

GLENN: I want to go on one.

STU: You could do it.

GLENN: I want to go on one.

PAT: If you are Indian, you could do that.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: I want a blood transfusion.

PAT: Get a little Inuit blood in you?

GLENN: Yes. Is that possible?

STU: I'm sure it is possible.

PAT: Probably.

GLENN: I mean, I don't think that technically changes me on the census but I'm willing to give it a whirl.

STU: Well, we haven't started with government healthcare yet. So that's probably still possible.

PAT: In addition to hunting polar bears, you may also receive a casino. So it might have a dual purpose. It might be good.

STU: Might. Although the casino would be in Northern Alaska and that's not well attended.

PAT: True.

STU: By the way, Glenn, the specifics here on what they have to do. Gore is right. They still can show the movie in classes. But they have to do the teachers have to do three things. Number one, announce that the film is a political work and promotes only one side of the argument.

PAT: It's in favor of the movie.

STU: Pretty good. I stand by it.

GLENN: No, it was better left alone the first time.

PAT: They are killing the planet.

GLENN: The memory of the first impression is so much better than the actual impression.

PAT: I knew that's where we'd go. So why do I try. Why do I try.

STU: I'm with you, Pat. I still support you.

PAT: Thank you, Stu. Stu.

STU: Number two, if teachers present the film without making this plain, they may be in breach of Section 406 of the Education Act of 1996 and guilty of political indoctrination.

PAT: Wow.

STU: Number 3...

GLENN: Listen to that. Listen to that.

PAT: In favor of the movie?

GLENN: This in favor... they are all in favor of the movie.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: It's a political film that only shows one side and if you show it without making that announcement, you are guilty of indoctrination.

STU: Yet even when you know that it's only showing one side of the argument and it's a political movie and you are guilty of political indoctrination of children if you don't say that, you still, in addition to that, have to do number three, which is 11 inaccuracies have to be specifically drawn to the attention of the schoolchildren.

PAT: Oh, it's not nine? It's eleven?

STU: It's eleven apparently.

GLENN: See, this guy who asked the question, he only said I think nine.

PAT: Yeah, he did.

GLENN: So smearing Al Gore with saying that there's nine when there's actually eleven. Why should we listen to this guy at all or any of his smear questions?

STU: Maybe it's been updated. Maybe two of them turned correct in the last couple of years.

GLENN: I don't think so.

PAT: I don't think so.

GLENN: Because it was global warming.

STU: I think he started at nine and went to eleven, in fact.

GLENN: Global warming, and it's awfully darn chilling lately.

PAT: I love the BBC story, though, where they are talking about where is all the global warming, what on Earth is going on. And then the next line is the next two lines: Climate change skeptics who passionately and consistently argue that man's influence on our climate is overstated say they saw it coming. They argue that there are natural cycles over which we have no control that dictate how warm the planet is, right? Here's the next sentence: But what's the evidence for this?

GLENN: I don't know, the ice age?

PAT: What's the evidence? I don't know. Do we have history books? Do we have science from the foundation of the world's I mean, supposedly all the way up until today?

STU: Yeah. There's certainly evidence that that occurs.

PAT: Isn't there evidence that there's ice ages?

STU: Eleven ice ages in the last, what, 700,000 years?

GLENN: That is because you are forgetting that every once in a while there is a naturally occurring umbrella that lodges itself in between the Earth and the sun.

STU: There is?

GLENN: Yes.

PAT: I didn't

GLENN: But then when primordial man came out of the soup of lizard stock

PAT: Six billion years ago.

GLENN: He went and he was like, that's a nice umbrella; I'd sure like that. And he reached up and he took it, and he broke it.

PAT: Oh, boy.

STU: Wait, who did this?

PAT: Man.

GLENN: Slimy man.

PAT: Before he even cleaned off?

GLENN: Before he was even cleaned off, he was like, what's that? That looks like a nice umbrella, and then broke it.

PAT: Was he a man at this point?

GLENN: No.

PAT: He was just man?

GLENN: He was slime man. He was still a little slimy and I think he may have had one fish foot and one lizard arm.

STU: Was he still slithering like a slithering sort of motion?

GLENN: He grabbed it good question.

STU: Thank you.

GLENN: He grabbed it not with his arm, his lizard arm.

STU: Right.

GLENN: But instead he grabbed it with his snake like tongue. And he was just like, gee, that looks like... sssssunny up there and he and the tongue went out, grabbed the umbrella.

PAT: That's good tongue sound effect.

STU: Right.

GLENN: That is, isn't it?

PAT: That is. That's good tongue sound effect.

GLENN: I always wanted to work for Hanna Barbera. When I was a kid I was like

STU: I'm going to have to say, Pat, but I think the tongue sound effect

PAT: A little better than the Al Gore, I have to admit it. Solid.

STU: That's what the liberal media won't teach you, that a tongue and the umbrella

GLENN: And they don't want to teach you that. They will say the tongue sound effect discussion is over. And then it just right into something else, some sort of propaganda, like Goldline.

I want to talk to you about something that probably didn't make a lot of sense a long time ago. In fact, I can't tell you how many program directors and how many stations threatened to cancel. Or how many calls I got from the average listener saying; What the hell are you even talking about when I talked about, the leadership of Martin Luther King.

I have done everything I can — as much as I possibly can — to teach you about Martin Luther King and nonviolent protests. And I don't think there's anybody in the media who has talked about nonviolence longer and more in-depth on commercial airwaves than me. Preachers, certainly. But commercial airwaves — I don't think anybody has.

Now I think many are beginning to understand why I tried to lay that foundation. I have told you since September 11th that I have this feeling you are going to be the group of people that will, in the end, save the republic.

I've always believed that. I don't know how it's saved. It might just be preserved in our hearts, I don't know. But I believe it now.

I never wanted us to get to this point — everything I've done is to prevent us from getting here. But everybody is so politically tied to their side that no one will let their shields down and actually listen to one another.

And we're at that desperate point now.

You are equipped to save the republic because you at least hopefully have a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. And you have at least a basic understanding of American history. More importantly, what makes this audience so phenomenal is that it is the most generous and service-minded audience of any show in America and perhaps the world.

That's part of what continues to be so frustrating about the Capitol invasion last week. Because you're being maligned.

You.

I know who you are. This is the most peaceful, generous, loving, God-fearing, authentic and patriotic audience in America. And you are frustrated and you are tired of being hit in the face and being called bigot and everything else no matter what you do.

I've been called an anti-Semite just in the last 24 hours by everybody, unjustly.

I get it.

You are now being tainted by the actions of complete imbeciles who do not represent you and me. It's not fair. But that's the hand that we're being dealt and God is in charge and He is not surprised.

We know the left's current tactics fail in the long run. Silencing. Canceling. Taking away rights.

We know the left's current tactics fail in the long run. Silencing. Canceling. Taking away rights. These are the hallmarks of regime, after regime, after Marxist regime on the ash heaps of history. Now China is still there because they've taken the so-called free market and took the capitalist system and they combined it with their Marxist utopia.

I don't know what's going to happen to the people over there. Especially seeing that our high-tech has joined them to weed out the dissidents. But it's not inevitable that we join them.

And it is going to require us to take a stand. Just not in the way that most people — especially if they're angry — think is most effective. Look at the ratings of BLM. 78 percent of Americans, at the beginning of the summer, thought that they were swell.

That number is in the low 20s now. Why? Because violence doesn't work.

I don't know if you saw the fellowship of the ring, but if you did, do you remember when Frodo said: "I don't want to do this!"

He's lamenting having to face down the evil and he's just one guy. I'll never forget it because it was right after 9/11, that the movie came out. I'll never forget Gandalf's reply. He said: "So do we all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what we're going to do with the time that is given us."

We can't decide what others are going to do. We can't control the dangerous Orwellian darkness that seems to be descending on America. All we can control is our response and strive to lead by example. If you know anyone in your sphere of influence who might be planning to attend one of these armed rallies in the coming days, beg them not to go. Do everything you can to stop them.

That's not a way to take a stand and it will not protect anything you hold dear and it will endanger the republic. It is what the other side wants.

So how do we take a stand?

The first thing I need you to do today is to help lower the temperature. It has been so hard for me not to respond to people on Twitter who have called me every name under the sun because I quoted the leading Holocaust historian last night on Tucker Carlson.

But see, that wasn't an attack on me, that was an attack on Tucker. If you can scare the guests from coming on to Tucker, you destroy Tucker. That's what they're doing.

Do not vent your anger on social media. At this point, it is probably just going to get your account shut down.

I want you to write this down and I want you to keep this in front of you.

Blessed are the peacemakers. For they will be called the children of God.

That means something today, much more than it did six months ago.

Blessed be the peacemakers.

Be a peacemaker.

And this is the hard part, you can't disconnect. Because things are moving too rapidly. You must stay plugged in.

But I want you to reach out to someone in kindness on social media. Encourage someone. Do not engage with the darkness. Be the light in the corner of your world.

You need to be a leader for what is to come.

And I know I'm asking you almost the impossible. I know you're angry and frustrated and it is gut-wrenching to feel that you're powerless to stop your nation from what you believe is sliding into the abyss.

You are not powerless. You are not voiceless.

I believe it too, with everything in me. I wish I was wrong. I hope that I am. I pray that I am. But know this: You are not powerless. You are not voiceless. You may be the only voice that anyone hears. Voices like mine will go away. I am trying to think of what I need to share with you before, God forbid, that ever happens. Because I cannot live with myself if I talked about something stupid politically and I find my voice silenced and then saying, I wish I would have said this or I wish I would have told them that.

You wield more power than you know. Not because of your voice or being able to call your congressman. You're more powerful than you know because you understand the real problem in America. The real problem in America is not political.

It is spiritual.

If you're like me when you get angry, you think that you are going to take on this challenge on your own — you are not being humble. You think you'll fix it. Everything that is happening to us is because we are an arrogant, out of control people.

We must humble ourselves. Please, you have the skill and the strength to endure the fiery darts that are going to come your way or already are. But this is a problem with our hearts.

You cannot reach someone's head without capturing their heart and no one is going to capture anyone's heart through violence.

Start in your own home and then reach out and if you're able, serve your neighbor. If you can, serve your local community. You must be a beacon of light in a very dark place. I'm going to ask you to do something you're really not going to like. And that's how I know things are from God. When I hear something or I think something and I'm like — oh crap, I don't want to do that — and you just know it it's right. You just know it's what God wants. And you're hoping that maybe you didn't hear it.

And it's so horrible. Because it's the last thing you want to do. But God is unlike many of our churches and preachers, He doesn't tell us what we want to hear. He doesn't have to pay for the church or get collection. Or be judged by how many people go.

Rise above the fray, with service and love, with malice toward none and charity toward all.

He'll say the same thing and he'll lose whole flocks. And they'll eventually start to go — oh wait, where is the Shepherd again?

But I have to tell you now some things that I want you to do. And they're not new. But I need you to hear me. I am asking you if you want to stand for the republic, I need you first to pray.

Pray like you've never prayed before. Pray for humility. Pray for guidance. Pray for peace. Pray for those people who you think you hate. Because you don't. Because hatred does not come from any good place.

Then I want you go out and serve someone in any way possible. On inauguration day especially, get your family and your children involved. Volunteer somewhere, take someone a meal. Do something to lift the spirits of hospital workers or your local police department.

Help a stranger mow a lawn, fix someone's car, pick up trash on the side of the highway. Do what you can do. But the most important thing is to do it with a sincere heart. And if someone asks you, why are you doing this? Just say, because I love my country.

Rise above the fray with service and love, with malice toward none and charity toward all.

Watch how the conversation went on radio HERE:

A pre-Inauguration Day plea: You wield MUCH more power than you know youtu.be


Early Monday morning, Amazon Web Services removed social networking platform Parler from its cloud servers. This comes just after Apple and Google removed the Parler app from their app stores over the weekend.

"You can't find them on the internet anymore. They're gone," Glenn Beck said on his radio program Monday.

"This is something I warned you of four years ago ... because a profound technological change is coming," he continued. "I told you, at the time, high tech will need the government, and the government will need high tech. And they will work together to preserve their power and their position. This is what's happening, today."

Glenn said he believes the "far left" has been talking about breaking up companies like Parler for years, and that the Capitol riots provided the opportunity they needed.

"This is not the end of this. This is where the Left is starting," he warned. "Those who persist in standing for freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom to assemble, freedom to keep and bear arms, those people will be targeted for deletion. You will be hounded, boycotted, fired, ostracized, and de-platformed. And the louder and the more significant and effective your voice is, the bigger the target is on your back.

"But, let me say this: I will never stop standing for freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom to assemble, freedom to keep and bear arms, and all of the rest of the Bill of Rights. That is the American thing to do."

Watch the video below for more from Glenn:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Glenn Beck: This is the REAL Raphael Warnock and our new 'national religion'

Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Multiple news outlets have called one of Georgia's Senate runoff elections for the Rev. Raphael Warnock, the Democrat who defeated Republican incumbent Sen. Kelly Loeffler.

So, on the radio show Wednesday, Glenn Beck looked into what this "radical preacher" has been saying in the past — and what he'll likely bring to the U.S. Senate in the future.

"Warnock is in one of the most influential and powerful stages of the country. And I use the word 'stage' intentionally," Glenn said. "It's the pulpit. He's the guy who says, if you voted for Donald Trump, well, you're a sinner."

Glenn introduced a video clip in which Warnock asserts:

If it is true that a man who has dominated the news and poisoned the discussion for months needs to repent, then it is doubly true that a nation that can produce such a man and make his vitriol go viral, needs to repent. I know, no matter what happens next month, more than a third of the nation that would go along with this, has reason to be afraid. America needs to repent for its worship of whiteness!

"So, (according to Warnock) you should be afraid," Glenn said. "Oh, and whiteness is evil. And, somehow or another, America has been worshiping whiteness ... see, critical race theory is now our new national religion."

Watch the video clip below to hear more from Glenn:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Nancy Pelosi and her growing ensemble of radical leftists are making sure that 2021 will be just as terrible as 2020 — terrible, and forcefully gender-neutral. The 117th Congress convened on Sunday, and on Monday, they shifted the goalposts by approving a 45-pages rules package, "H. Res 7," in a 217 to 206 vote. The Rules Package is the brainchild of Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rules Committee Chairman James McGovern (D-MA).

Yesterday, in a speech to the House, Republican Rep. Tom Cole described the proposals as "some of the harshest and most cynical that I've experienced during my time in Congress." Congressman Steve Scalise accurately called it a "Soviet-Style rules package. ... designed to take away the voice of 48% of this chamber."

Some of the many wild rule changes include a continuation of proxy voting during the coronavirus pandemic, a ban on lawmakers convicted of certain crimes from visiting the House floor, and of course what would Democrats be without their hatred for Donald Trump? With the rule changes, they've found a way to attack Trump even after he's left office. They've added provisions that allow them to send subpoenas to former Presidents, former VPs, and former White House staff long after their administration has left the White House.

They've added provisions that allow them to send subpoenas to former Presidents, former VPs, and former White House...

Pelosi called the plan a "visionary rules package" which "reflects the values of her diverse Democratic majority," framing the proposal as a departure from ignorance, with that elitist under-handed way of condescending to non-woke Americans. She called them "future-focused proposals," as if conservatives and Republicans aren't worried about the future. Democrats honestly believe this. Believe that we pray to God for the destruction of the future, whatever it means. Although, Democrats are certainly not the authority on prayer: They can't even say one without jamming it full of woke inanity. And "inanity" is the word for it. Because the Democrats have devolved into utter nonsense.

In the news cycle, stories get buried. It feels like we're all constantly putting out fires. Politicians love this: Just about every controversy vanishes quickly. Shady legislation goes unnoticed. The mainstream media isn't going to report on this, not with any semblance of honesty or critical thought. As always, they're more interested in attacking Donald Trump. So it's up to us to ask, "Wait a minute, you're doing what now?"

You may be thinking, "How do the rules for the House of Representatives affect me?" Because you can tell a lot about a person by the way they run their house, or in this case their workplace. If this is how they want to conduct their workplace, I'm terrified to see how they'll run the country. Because, even though it will require ethical breaches and severe overreach, that's exactly what they're about to do, including a rule that keeps the House Minority from amending legislation on the floor.

In true leftist fashion, Democrats have projected their own injustices on Republicans. Like how the bill refers to the new rules as "sweeping ethics reforms," the implication being that there were ethical violations that demanded reforming.

Yesterday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said it best, delivered a scathing rebuke of House Democrats. I recommend watching the whole thing. In particular, he took umbrage with the way the rules violate our freedom of speech, the most important right that we have as Americans.

He's right: This hatred for free speech began in academia. Specifically, from the Marxist radicals who promote and adhere to Critical Theory. We conservatives have spent so much time on Critical Race Theory, but we're missing the bigger picture. Critical Race Theory is just a wart on the looming monster known as Critical Theory. If you think the riots were bad, if you thought sports had become overrun by woke politics, if you thought colleges were bad already — you better get ready for the ideological tidal wave, because it's so about to be much worse. The whole thing is Critical Theory gone wild. I'll tell you why in a moment. First, let's look through the details.

Gender

The resolution aims to "make this House of Representatives the most inclusive in history," and opens by formally establishing the Office of Diversity and Inclusion. An entire department within the lower house of Congress devoted to bringing Critical Theory to life."Inclusion and diversity," two concepts entrenched in Critical Theory inanity. The left would call them "dog whistles," seemingly innocuous words that signal something evil. Apparently, inclusion and diversity are the reason House Democrats felt the need to change the name of the Office of the Whistleblower Ombudsman, "to the gender-neutral Office of the Whistleblower Ombuds."

Then they really lose it in subsection e: "Gender-Inclusive Language." This section "modernizes the use of pronouns, familial relationship terminology, and other references to gender in order to be inclusive of all members, delegates, resident commissioners, employees of the House, and their families."

In other words, the standing rules will now be gender-inclusive. ''Seamen'' will now be ''seafarers." ''Chairman'' is ''Chair." And one clause of House rules removed the terms father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother" — you get the idea.

The new rules also require "standing committees to include in their oversight plans a discussion of how committee work over the forthcoming Congress will address issues of inequities on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, age, or national origin; honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships in the House rules to be gender-neutral."

Free Speech

One of the most egregious parts of the rules changes is the way they'll compromise free speech. Democrats want to protect free speech only if it's something they agree with. They've taken this to villainous extremes.

Deep Fake Media

●The Democrat rules package also made it an ethics violation for members to knowingly distribute "deep fake" media.

●The wording is vague, and could easily encompass conservative media. What do they mean by fake media? Memes? Articles? Jokes? Op-eds? "regulations addressing the dissemination by electronic means of any image, video, or audio file that has been distorted or manipulated with the intent to mislead the public.

●It applies not only to Representatives' official accounts but also to their personal accounts, a clear violation of free speech. "They would penalize any member who shares news or views that liberals and their allies in the media deem 'fake.' They actually make it an ethics violation, which is usually reserved for such unbecoming conduct as bribery and corruption."

Pay As You Go (PayGo) Exemptions

●The new rules also weaken PayGo, a budgetary-control measure that limits "Tax and Spend" policies and requires Congress to offset spending on bills that would increase the deficit.

●They are the payment rules on legislation related to the virus and climate change that previously required lawmakers to identify new revenue sources or spending cuts to fund their priorities.

●Democrats will now be able to force through any legislation regardless of the cost, and for legislation like the Green New Deal. Yet AOC actually had a problem with this caveat, but of course, her reason for opposing it is as asinine as you'd expect.

The Motion to Recommit (MTR)

Congress is a majoritarian institution. They govern themselves, as long as it doesn't violate the Constitution. Since Democrats regained the majority two years ago, they have treaded that line and I would say that they've been downright unconstitutional. For those entire two years, they boasted that in 2020 they'd sweep Congress, all of it, but especially The House of Representatives. They were wrong, and now they have the slimmest majority in years. And I'm positive that their hubris is largely responsible.

They were wrong, and now they have the slimmest majority in years.

Since the creation of the modern party system shortly before the Civil War, there have been 18 House majority changes, with Democrats in power the most.

●The motion to recommit provides one final opportunity for the House to debate and amend a measure, typically after the engrossment and third reading of the bill, before the Speaker orders the vote on final passage. ... The motion does not delay or kill the bill. MTR gives the Minority, and by extension their constituents, a voice by denying them the chance to debate a bill on the floor.

●It's been around since the House was founded, and in its present form since 1909. In 1919, Rep. Abraham Garrett said that "The Motion to Recommit is regarded as so sacred, it's one of the few rules protected against the Committee on Rules by the General Rules of the House."

●When Pelosi was in the Minority, she described the MTR as grounded in the Free Speech guaranteed by our constitution. Anytime the Republicans had the majority, they never even considered cutting off MTR.

Democrats shifted the goalposts by redefining words, by degrading the current meanings, and by trying to convince us that we are fundamentally immoral. It's textbook Critical Theory: attack our sense of reality, our understanding of knowledge, our guiding beliefs, and, now, our most fundamental rights.

We've entered the era of Critical Theory. Wokeness is the new law.

Literally.

The time for metaphors is over; the House of Representatives just instituted wokeness into policy. They're still not saying the quiet part aloud. Critical Theory allows for this. Saddle up to the new normal. The new authoritarianism. Just like how nobody took 20 seconds to hop on Wikipedia and check the etymology of "amen", none of the Democrats have really thought out their plan.

Article I, Section 8 of The Constitution delineates the powers granted to the Congress, one of which is "to provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel Invasions."

Well, lately, America has been overrun by insurrections and invasions and Congress can't do much about it because they're in on the insurrection. Significant factions within the legislative branch have encouraged these insurrections, they have validated the invasive radicals who threaten to destroy our country. And they've done it under the auspices of furtherance. Of being progressive. Of not being racist, or transphobic, or whatever insult is trendy on woke Twitter.

The time for metaphors is over; the House of Representatives just instituted wokeness into policy.

They're saying, "surrender some of your rights, some of your luxuries, some of your privileges — you have so many, you don't deserve them — and you'll make the world a smidge better." It's the kind of ideology that shreds through people like they're nothing and it is swallowing America whole. Once they change the rules and they change the words, you're living a real-life version of Orwell's 1984. What we need in a moment like this are strong people willing to face the wrath of a Leftist establishment that is all too happy to watch the world burn.

McCarthy talked about how people were feeling this indignation. Well, Kevin, I want you to know, it's not just you. I feel it. I think more than 70 million Americans feel it.


WATCH HIS FULL SPEECH HERE:

Leader McCarthy Slams Democrats' House Rules Package youtu.be


It's not going away any time soon.

And today, I ask that you just prepare mentally, for a rough road ahead. But one that we win in, in the end. And I can say it with confidence because I know the truth, will always set people free.

The truth will always prevail.