Glenn Beck: Obama Excuses Wearing Thin




Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Webcam, an exclusive feature available only to Glenn Beck Insiders. Learn more...

GLENN: From high above Times Square, Midtown Manhattan, third most listened to show in all of America. My name is Glenn Beck. Have you heard the news, my friend? President Obama has inherited an economic mess from the Bush administration. This is from an article entitled Obama Excuses Wearing Thin from the Chicago Sun Times. You say you've hardly heard this news? But it's been the message sounded over and over by the White House. Top Obama advisor David Axelrod said on one of the many Sunday news shows, quote, he walked in the door, we had the worst economy since the Great Depression. In San Francisco this is what Barack Obama was saying.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I'm busy and Nancy's busy with our mop cleaning up somebody else's mess.

GLENN: That's right. In San Francisco.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: We don't want somebody sitting back saying you are not holding the mop the right way.

GLENN: He talked about being busy with our mop. White House heavy hitter Rahm Emanuel used the "worst economy since the Great Depression" line on the public TV news shows on Sunday. The Chicago Sun Times says that you'd think it was October 2008, the final month in the Obama presidential candidacy, rather than October 2009, nine months into the Obama presidency. Yet, the Obama White House is in full fledged campaign mode because it needs to mask the shortcomings of the Obama presidency. Take, for example, says the Chicago Sun Times, all the talk of inheriting the worst economy since the 1930s crisis.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: My administration inherited a deficit of over $1 trillion but because we also inherited the most profound economic emergency since the Great Depression...

GLENN: Okay. Got it? The most profound economic crisis since the Great Depression. That came into response to the news that the federal deficit hit $1.4 trillion.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: We are going through the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

GLENN: Got it.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: We've lost now 3.6 million jobs, but what's perhaps even more disturbing is that almost half of that job loss has taken place over the last three months.

GLENN: Yet just a few months ago the Obama camp was signing the stimulus package and they were singing a different tune. Because it was under criticism for the $787 billion stimulus package that had bulldozed through congress on the grounds that massive spending was needed to keep the unemployment rate from breaching 8%. When joblessness hit 9.5% in June, vice president Joe Biden said?

BIDEN: The truth is we and everyone else misfigured the economy. The figures we worked off in January were the consensus figures of most of the blue chip indexes out there.

GLENN: So they inherited the worst economy and the worst economic situation since the Great Depression. And the economy turned out to be worse than they thought. Which is it? Can anyone answer that question? It can't be both. The Chicago suns times says unless your brain is completely addled by the Obama charisma. Obama is still popular but polls show that the public is losing faith in his policies. We'll give you those polls from CNN here in a few minutes. Another indicator was Saturday Night Live, a skit lampooning Obama for the major accomplishments of his administration, Jack and Squat.

VOICE: Looking at this list I'm seeing two big accomplishments: Jack and Squat.

GLENN: Now, if the honeymoon is ending with the American voter, it isn't for the obsequious elements of the mainstream media. CNN prostrated itself fact checking the Jack and Squat skit from Saturday Night Live.

VOICE: The best improvements from the war in Afghanistan, is it better? No, I think it's actually worse.

VOICE: But is there any truth to this?

VOICE: They got some things wrong. For example

VOICE: Bill Adair, editor of PolitiFact.com, a nonpartisan fact checking website that rates statements of officials says SNL missed some of the marks on some of its claims. For instance, Afghanistan.

VOICE: I think SNL tended to kind of gloss over what is a fair amount of progress by this administration about sending two additional brigades to Afghanistan. We rated that a promise kept.

GLENN: That is unbelievable.

PAT: This just in. MSNBC has just fact checked last night's SpongeBob SquarePants episode.

GLENN: I mean, when have you ever seen that done?

STU: Crabby patties are not that expensive, and they need to make sure that the people know it.

PAT: Nor do they taste that good frankly.

STU: They are okay.

PAT: Sometimes they are stale.

GLENN: Chicago Sun Times continues: But that's harmless compared to the virulent campaign against Obama critics carried out by the denizens of MSNBC. It's Obama acolytes seek to demonize opponents of Obama's policies by focusing on most marginal corners of rightwing politics like, for example, the Birthers who deny that Obama is a natural born citizen. The larger scheme is to imply that Obama critics are racists.

VOICE: Janine Garofalo, good to see you.

GAROFALO: Thank you, there is nothing more interesting than seeing a bunch of racists become confused and angry at a speech they are not quite certain what to think. It sounds right to them and then it doesn't make sense which, let's be very honest about what this is about. It's not about bashing Democrats. It's not about bashing taxes. They have no idea what the Boston tea party is about. They don't know their history at all. This is about hating a black man in the White House. This is racism state up.

GLENN: You don't even know what the Boston tea party is really all about. That's the backdrop to the story of Rush Limbaugh, getting booted from a group bidding to buy the St. Louis rams. He was smeared on CNN and MSNBC with false accusations of making two racist comments. He is an abrasive critic of Obama; so he must be racist, or so goes the leftwing story line, writes the Chicago Sun Times. They continue: I wouldn't defend everything Limbaugh has ever said, but lies were used to blacklist him from professional football for his political views. Recently an MSNBC personality accused the U.S. Chamber of Commerce of lobbying for policies that amount to being treasonous to this country.

VOICE: Tom, that's irrelevant. That's irrelevant. If I set up a business where I can speculate

TOM: I'm not exactly sure the point you want to make.

VOICE: Let me finish. If I set up a business where I can speculate with your money, Tom, where I can go to your account and you're every taxpayer in America and the more I speculate with, the more I make, of course I'm going to speculate until the thing blows up. So unless the government and people like you that lobby to the exemptions that allow banks to do that get out of the way, we will never have fair play again in this country and we'll have job creation by virtue of taxpayer theft, which is ultimately destructive, and I would argue treasonous to this country.

GLENN: Did he say job creation through taxpayer funds?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: And that's treasonous. Do I have that right? Job creation through taxpayer funds.

PAT: So the stimulus would have

GLENN: Don't think it through.

PAT: Okay.

GLENN: Remember how writing in the Chicago Sun Times, remember how liberals roared in outrage at any hint of their patriotism being questioned for criticizing the Iraq war. Well, it is the left that doesn't shy from attacking the patriotism of those it dislikes. Recall the repulsive moveon.org General Betrayus ad against Iraqi commander General David Petraeus. Recent opposition to Chicago's Olympic bid was cast as sign of lack of patriotism among Obama critics. An MSNBC blast against the chamber appears to dovetail with what the Politico newspaper reports is a White House and Democratic effort to marginalize the business organization that echoes the administration assault on Fox News. It says Fox isn't a news organization.

VOICE: It's not so much a conflict with Fox News but unlike, I suppose, the way to look at it and the way the president looks at it, we look as it is it's not a news organization so much as it has a perspective. And that's a different take. And more importantly is not have the CNNs and the others in the world basically be led and following Fox.

VOICE: I don't you know, I'm not concerned. Mr. Murdock has a talent for making money, and I understand that their programming is geared toward making money. All the only argument Anita was making is that they are not really a news station, if you watch even it's not just their commentators but a lot of their news programming, it's really not news. It's pushing a point of view and the bigger thing is that other news organizations like yours ought not to treat them that way and we are not going to treat them that way. We're going to appear on their shows, we're going to participate but understanding that they represent a point of view.

GLENN: The White House is trying to dictate who's a news organization. Democrats are out to gut the Chamber of Commerce. Obama media allies damning Americans as racist, unpatriotic and now treasonous. Is this the America Obama promised when he campaigned to end the cynical and divisive politics of the past? That's in the Chicago Sun Times. Would you explain to me the story about the Obama administration now in bed with Media Matters on Fox News? Do you have that, Pat?

PAT: Yeah. Let's see.

STU: You said now embedded? Like as if there was another state of being?

PAT: Here's what moveon.org just sent out. Dear moveon member: All year Fox has worked 24/7 to block President Obama's agenda, repeating lies about death panels, promoting tea party protests and whipping up fake political scandals. Now President Obama is fighting back. The White House

GLENN: Hold on. Hold on just a second. What are the fake political scandals? And if it was so fake, shouldn't Van Jones sue the White House? He was forced to resign I'm sorry. No, he hasn't. He decided to resign. Should he have resigned over a fake political scandal? How about the NEA? Is that fake? This is quite the charge. I'd sure like an answer to that. Shouldn't you sue me if these charges are false? I mean, shouldn't you at least come out and make the charge? I mean, don't you have a right to face your accusers in this country? See, I will clearly, if we got it wrong and we have our researchers, I mean, I can show you all the paperwork that we've done. We have not done it to just higgledy piggledy run and smear somebody. We haven't done that. There's may I show you the board in the other room on the things that I could say but haven't? Because we don't have them verified? I mean, I got a list a mile long. If I were being irresponsible, I'd go with that list.

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.