Glenn Beck: Sarah Palin on Oprah


Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Webcam, an exclusive feature available only to Glenn Beck Insiders. Learn more...

Glenn: Let's start with let's start with Sarah Palin. Shall we? Can we start a little Sarah Palin and Sarah Palin on Oprah yesterday. Who saw it? Did anybody watch it? You saw it. Stu is a little Stu said that the audience was unbelievably, what would you

Pat: Noncommittal.

Stu: Cold. If you've ever watched an Oprah Winfrey program, one of the distinctive characteristics of the program is whenever any woman says anything, they go crazy, like it's the greatest thing they've ever heard.

Glenn: I heard that. I heard that.

Pat: Foot rot.

Glenn: Yeah. So, they are a little mindless in their, you know, praising of people.

Stu: Yeah. They love their Oprah and when Oprah seems to like something, they love what she likes.

Pat: Sure.

Stu: And that's okay. You're a fan of the program. Certainly.

Glenn: Like minded people.

Stu: And I did not get that sense, that the audience was as fond of Sarah Palin than they were of

Glenn: It's Sarah Palin. I said, it's Sarah Palin. She's got foot rot.

Stu: So, it was not many times I kind of expected the audience to really I mean, you know this is obviously they're not talking about deep policy here. This is Oprah. They're talking about her family, children, tough decisions that have been made inside the family with pregnancies and

Glenn: Things they would normally applaud, though.

Stu: Oh. Yeah. This is the stuff this audience is there for and they did not seem to be overly warm to Mrs. Palin.

Glenn: I have not, I have not read Mrs. Palin's book yet and I you know, I wonder, we have an interview scheduled with her and I'm wondering if I just wait on the interview because I've seen her everywhere and you kind of get, you know everybody's doing the same kind of thing right now and it's

Pat: Like chicken man, he's everywhere, he's everywhere. That was just me.

Stu: Is that a reference or

Pat: Yeah.

Stu: It's like Dick Orton.

Glenn: So, she's everywhere and I really want you know, Rush Limbaugh said that this is book is what did he say? the most

Pat: Substantive book, one of the most he's ever read.

Glenn: That's significant.

Pat: Yeah, it's big.

Stu: Obviously I haven't read it yet, either. It came out today, but I don't know. That's not the way they're treating it in the media by any means. But it is not also not surprising they would treat it that way.

Pat: I have thumbed through it and it seems like a lot of very interesting stuff. It seems like a lot of stuff that happened during the campaign, etc., etc., but I only saw one chapter that seemed to be really about policy.

Stu: Well, it could be they're really good policies. It might not necessarily be the biggest policy book of all time but my guess is her policies are probably right. They're probably good policies because that seems to be what she supports, at least from our perspective. So, I would not be surprised at all on that.

Glenn: I saw a little bit of the Oprah thing yesterday. You know, the thing that I think makes her look because I'm trying to think, okay, how is it that she looks stupid?

Pat: I don't know.

Glenn: Well, I do in some ways. She looks stupid in the old interviews that she did and I think it's completely acceptable to be this way, unless you're a national public figure. You look stupid when you don't know who you're dealing with.

Stu: She sort of said that in the interview.

Pat: She did and we have that if you want to hear where Oprah asked her you know, she said, you had kind of a rough time.

Glenn: Yeah. Play this. Play this.

Oprah: Why don't you just name some books or magazines?

Palin: Well, obviously I have all my life read. I'm a lover of books and magazines and newspapers. By the time she asked me that question, even though it was kind of early on in the interview, I was already so annoyed and it was very unprofessional of me to wear that annoyance on my sleeve, but

Oprah: You couldn't think of any at the moment or

Palin: No. I was, like, are you kidding me? It seemed like it was in the contain text of do you need, it seemed like she was asking me how do you stay in touch with the real world? That's how I took the question. So, I kind of well, didn't kind. I did. I rolled my eyes and was annoyed with the question and thought, you know, I think that this is a problem with the state of journalism today is no matter what I say to her, it will probably be twisted, perceived as a bit negative.

Glenn: Okay. Stop for a second. I completely understand that and I don't think anybody who I didn't even understand that a year ago. In the last year, I began to understand who I'm dealing with and who you're dealing with in the media. You don't know what the game is like. When can we talk about what happened last week? Is that a couple of weeks?

Stu: Yeah, a couple of weeks. Still a couple of weeks ago.

Glenn: There's something that happened last week and we'll talk about it in a couple of weeks, but I'm just by something and I can't say anything, that I was so absolutely on guard and I realized halfway through, I could have such a great conversation with this person if we weren't playing gotcha and that's all that's played is gotcha. They're going to ask you this simple question and so when you're in this interview, you don't you can't even imagine. America, you just can't imagine. You're like I am. You trust people. You trust people to be decent because everybody you know is decent. You may not agree with them, but they're decent. They're fair. You would expect journalists to be fire. They're not. They're not. They come into the interview knowing exactly who you are and I'm going to get them. I'm going to be the one that gets them. And so they strategize in their head. I'm going to ask this question first, then I'm going to ask this question, then I'm going to ask this one, because if you ask this one first, if he answers it this way, Oh, oh, when I get to the third question do you know what I mean? So, you have to in your head quickly assess what is the real intent behind this question. Well, you look stupid when you first get into it because you don't know that's the game they're playing because you've never played New York journalist hard ball. It ain't nice. It's not pretty. It is who's a better games man. That's all it is. It's not even about the truth. It's who can destroy whom. Who is going can you, as a presidential candidate, hold that person at bay, can you do this is what Sarah Palin did to David Letterman. She taught the media a lesson. Now, the media's not going to go out and make jokes about her daughter, but that's not the lesson. The lesson was, Really? You think you can get me? Me, personally? I don't think David Letterman's intent was to say that her young daughter was, you know, going out, you know, and having sex at 14. Maybe it was. Maybe it was.

Stu: It's a good argument to be made for that. David Letterman's not really the one to be looking into those kinds of things.

Glenn: It could be, but when I first heard that, I didn't take it, but when I heard Sarah Palin's response, I didn't say good for you. I did this: (Indicating.) Oh, my gosh. Don't mess with that woman, because what she did was she took now, maybe it was honest, but I've become jaded. Maybe it was completely honest that David Letterman meant it that way and she took it that way, but there's an equal, if not greater chance, that David Letterman didn't mean it that way but Sarah Palin had had enough and she wanted to send a message to all of the media, don't screw with me. You think I'm a little hick? Really? Watch how I destroy David Letterman and take this little funny thing that he just did and rub his nose in it. That's what she's done. Now, that's what interviews in New York are all about. If you're a presidential candidate, you've got to show them, don't screw with me. Really? You want ask me that question, Katie? I've got a question for you or I've got a response and maybe that response doesn't ever make it to air. But that response, Katie Couric never forgets. That response she tells her friends, don't screw with him. Don't screw with her. You do it once on the air or you do it like David Letterman, like she did to David Letterman, and you've taught them she's sharp enough cut your throat and you won't even see it coming.

Stu: This is a great point you're making of imagine what the media could be if that wasn't the game.

Glenn: Exactly right. Imagine the truth you could get to if they didn't you know, Al Sharpton said to me one time, the first time I interviewed Al Sharpton, he looked down at my notes and he said, you handwrite your notes out or somebody handwrites your notes? And I said, somebody handwrites my note? No. I handwrote my notes out. And he said, you write your own questions? That was such a bizarre question to me. And I said, yeah. Doesn't everybody? He said, no. They're usually not that curious. Somebody else writes the questions for most hosts, not all. The good ones, they write, but most hosts that are on television, the questions are in the prompter or they're just on a sheet, ask this guest this question. Okay? They already know the response. They already know the questions and the really you know, the people like Katie Couric or Oprah Winfrey, those questions are designed in a committee. They're designed by a group. This is an important interview. There's a group of people saying these are the questions you've got to ask. These are the questions that we think you can ask and you can get this kind of a response. These are the questions that will either destroy this person or put you on the map or in their dream of dreams, both. Put you on the map for destroying this person. So, Sarah Palin looked stupid to a lot of people when she first came out because she had never played that game. I have to tell you, I'm still at the in the learning curve of that game. Just so the media knows, I'm not the guy I was six months ago. Go ahead, brother. Go ahead. I'm not so naive, I don't trust people taking my picture anymore. We just turned down a deal with People magazine. They wanted to do a big spread because they wouldn't let us use our photographer. Well, what we're people magazine. We're going to use our really? I've been burned by a photographer before, one that I looked into her eyes and said, look. I'm willing to make fun of me, I'm willing to do stuff, I'm willing just, please, I'm a human being. I'm a dad. Don't do anything do what you say you're going to do with these pictures. Oh, my gosh. Absolutely. Of course. She lied to my face, looked me in the eye. I talked to her human being to human being, an artist that is supposed to be able to connect with the human soul. Nothing. Dead inside. I don't nobody takes my photo, nobody takes my photo. George Lang is the only guy that will ever take my photo, period. You want a photo of me, talk to George Lang because I can actually be myself, I can be crazy, risky, you know, somber, whatever it is, I can be who I am and I know he will never violate my trust on those pictures. That's, unfortunately, the world you have to live in. Now, second thing that I think makes Sarah Palin look kind of stupid, you know, people will say, oh, she's stupid. It's in a damn Minnesota accent that I know she never lived in Minnesota, that accent drives me crazy.

Acclaimed environmentalist and author of "Apocalypse Never" Michael Shellenberger joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Wednesday to warn us about the true goals and effects of climate alarmism: It's become a "secular religion" that lowers standards of living in developed countries, holds developing countries back, and has environmental progress "exactly wrong."

Michael is a Time "Hero of the Environment," Green Book Award winner, and the founder and president of Environmental Progress. He has been called a "environmental guru," "climate guru," "North America's leading public intellectual on clean energy," and "high priest" of the environmental humanist movement for his writings and TED talks, which have been viewed more than 5 million times. But when Michael penned a stunning article in Forbes saying, "On Behalf of Environmentalists, I Apologize for the Climate Scare", the article was pulled just a few hours later. (Read more here.)

On the show, Micheal talked about how environmental alarmism has overtaken scientific fact, leading to a number of unfortunate consequences. He said one of the problems is that rich nations are blocking poor nations from being able to industrialize. Instead, they are seeking to make poverty sustainable, rather than to make poverty history.

"As a cultural anthropologist, I've been traveling to poorer countries and interviewing small farmers for over 30 years. And, obviously there are a lot of causes why countries are poor, but there's no reason we should be helping them to stay poor," Michael said. "A few years ago, there was a movement to make poverty history ... [but] it got taken over by the climate alarmist movement, which has been focused on depriving poor countries, not just of fossil fuels they need to develop, but also the large hydroelectric dams."

He offered the example of the Congo, one of the poorest countries in the world. The Congo has been denied the resources needed to build large hydroelectric dams, which are absolutely essential to pull people out of poverty. And one of the main groups preventing poor countries from the gaining financing they need to to build dams is based in Berkeley, California — a city that gets its electricity from hydroelectric dams.

"It's just unconscionable ... there are major groups, including the Sierra Club, that support efforts to deprive poor countries of energy. And, honestly, they've taken over the World Bank [which] used to fund the basics of development: roads, electricity, sewage systems, flood control, dams," Micheal said.

"Environmentalism, apocalyptic environmentalism in particular, has become the dominant religion of supposedly secular people in the West. So, you know, it's people at the United Nations. It's people that are in very powerful positions who are trying to impose 'nature's order' on societies," he continued. "And, of course, the problem is that nobody can figure out what nature is, and what it's not. That's not a particular good basis for organizing your economy."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Dr. Voddie Baucham, Dean of Theology at African Christian University in Lusaka, Zambia, joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to explain why he agrees with Vice President Mike Pence's refusal to say the phrase "Black Lives Matter."

Baucham, who recently drew national attention when his sermon titled "Ethnic Gnosticism" resurfaced online, said the phrase has been trademarked by a dangerous, violent, Marxist movement that doesn't care about black lives except to use them as political pawns.

"We have to separate this movement from the issues," Baucham warned. "I know that [Black Lives Matter] is a phrase that is part of an organization. It is a trademark phrase. And it's a phrase designed to use black people.

"That phrase dehumanizes black people, because it makes them pawns in a game that has nothing whatsoever to do with black people and their dignity. And has everything to do with a divisive agenda that is bigger than black people. That's why I'm not going to use that phrase, because I love black people. I love being black."

Baucham warned that Black Lives Matter -- a radical Marxist movement -- is using black people and communities to push a dangerous and divisive narrative. He encouraged Americans to educate themselves on the organization's agenda and belief statement.

"This movement is dangerous. This movement is vicious. And this movement uses black people," he emphasized. "And so if I'm really concerned about issues in the black community -- and I am -- then I have to refuse, and I have to repudiate that organization. Because they stand against that for which I am advocating."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

We're going to be doing an amazing broadcast on Thursday, July 2nd, and we will be broadcasting a really important moment. It is restoring truth. It is restoring our history. It is asking to you make a covenant with God. The covenant that was made by the Pilgrims. And it's giving you a road map of things that we can do, to be able to come back home, together.

All of us.

And it's never been more important. Join us live from the Standing Rock Ranch on Blaze TV, YouTube and Facebook at 8:00 p.m. Eastern time on Thursday July, 2nd and restore the hope in you.

Make sure you join us and use the hashtag and spread the word, fight the mob today and you'll save $20 on your year of subscription. We need you now more than ever.

RESTORING HOPE: Join Glenn live from Standing Rock Ranch to restore the American covenant youtu.be

On last week's Wednesday night special, Glenn Beck revealed where the Black Lives Matter organization really gets its funding, and the dark money trail leading to a cast of familiar characters. Shortly after the program aired, one of BLM's fiscal sponsors, Thousand Currents, took down its board of directors page, which featured one of these shady characters:

Ex-Marxist professor and author of "Beyond Woke," Michael Rectenwald, joined Glenn Beck on the TV show to fill us in on the suspicious change he discovered on the Thousand Currents webpage and the Communist terrorists who is now helping run the organization. (Fortunately, the internet is forever, so it is still possible to view the board of directors page by looking at a web archive from the WayBack Machine.)

Rectenwald revealed the shocking life history of Thousand Currents' vice chair of the board, Susan Rosenberg, who spent 16 years in federal prison for her part in a series of increasingly violent acts of terrorism, including bombing the U.S. Capitol building, bombing an FBI building, and targeting police for assassination.

"Their whole campaign was one of unbelievably vicious, murderous cop killings, assassinations, and bombings," explained Rectenwald of Rosenberg's terror group known as the May 19th Communist Organization or M19.

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:


Glenn's full investigation into the dark origins of the funding behind Black Lives Matter is available for BlazeTV subscribers. Not a subscriber? Use promo code GLENN to get $10 off your BlazeTV subscription or start your 30-day free trial today.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.