Glenn Beck: The biggest scandal in American history


Evil Conservative Industries cares about conserving fuel - learn more...

GLENN: Hey, Stu, I thought of you on Friday because of the global warming computers that were hacked into.

STU: Amazing.

GLENN: I was on the road.

PAT: Great story.

GLENN: I haven't had a chance to follow this. I know we're going to cover it tonight. Give me all the ins and outs of this thing, you two.

STU: Well, basically it was a hacker went, broke into the computers of one of the main centers O' climate change, one of the biggest sort of alarmist group of scientists and hacked in and put out on the Internet thousands of e mails and documents.

PAT: This is going to be stunning. They showed, what did they show, Stu?

STU: They shockingly showed that they were manipulating evidence.

PAT: No!

GLENN: Is it true

PAT: Exaggerating the case, if you will.

GLENN: Is it true that the hockey stick thing great that guy is one of the guys on these e mails, Michael Mann who show people have been diving into these processes which most of the time he won't give up at all for people to look at because he knows how shady they are. But they have been looking into them for quite a while and have found you know, you look at some of these e mails here. They are, you know, talking about literally doing tricks to hide the decline of temperatures. That's how clear it is. I mean now, you know

GLENN: They use the word "Tricks."

PAT: Yeah, in quotations, tricks. Statistical tricks in the charts.

STU: Here it is. This is the quote. This is from one of the main scientists. I've just completed Mike's, which is Michael Mann, the guy we were just talking about, I just completed Mike's nature trick. Nature is a scientific term. So I've just completed Mike's nature trick of adding the real temps for each series the last 20 years and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline. They are talking about hiding the decline in temperatures by using tricks. Now, tricks may or may not mean, that doesn't necessarily mean something elicit. Maybe it's just something in the math. You could try to justify that.

GLENN: How do you justify hide the decline?

STU: Hide the decline, how do you justify that? Hide something, they are hiding something. Then they are multiple e mails.

GLENN: This is why they shout so hard.

PAT: Oh, yeah.

GLENN: That the debate is over. You can't debate it when you are into tricks.

STU: There are multiple e mails that show them conspiring to delete evidence, deleting e mails to avoid Freedom of Information Act requests, the U.K.'s version of the Freedom of Information Act. I mean, they are talking about please delete all e mails regarding this topic. And they have them. I mean, it's unbelievable. Honestly like in 100 years you'd never thought you'd have evidence that is this overwhelming.

GLENN: I'm telling you, I'm telling you I said this before, and again everybody made fun of me and probably still do on this. When all is said and done, in the end if there's anything left to tell the story, this is the biggest scandal in American history. These are the biggest events.

PAT: Global warming?

GLENN: No.

PAT: The whole thing?

GLENN: The whole

PAT: It is.

GLENN: Because these are the same people. These are progressives.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: It's the same people.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: This is the biggest story in American history because maybe world history because it is going to depending on who wins, it's either going to be cleaned up but collapse the system and we're going to have to start all over again because we untethered ourself from principles and we said character doesn't matter. Well, it does. And we either collapse and rebuild ourself and they will be remembered as the worst of the worst, or they will just take it and they will have won the entire world. But this is for all of the chips. This is it. This is the game.

PAT: And that's why they keep getting more and more absurd, bizarre and ridiculous every day. Like this, the effects of climate change have driven women in communities and coastal areas and poor countries into prostitution.

STU: Really?

PAT: Yes.

STU: So global warming now causes

PAT: Global warming. Here's the let me at least read the quote. Climate change I love this. Climate change could reduce income from farming and fishing. Hasn't yet.

STU: It could.

PAT: It could.

STU: Possible.

PAT: Climate change could reduce income from farming and fishing, possibly driving some women into sex work and thereby increasing HIV infection.

STU: Should, possibly, if.

PAT: Global climate change could, possibly and may increase AIDS.

GLENN: Hang on just a second. Show me the hockey stick. So you are saying the temperature of the Earth is causing people to get AIDS at a higher rate?

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: It may be the only reason of AIDS?

PAT: Don't you know, Glenn, because of your small mind that small brothels usually pop up near coastal areas where many women perform sexual services for transient seafarers? And when it gets hot and dry

GLENN: Transient seafarers?

PAT: When it gets hot and dry, they got no alternative.

GLENN: Got to pull into port.

PAT: Go straight into prostitution and service these seamen, if you will.

STU: There is an insurmountable amount of jokes.

PAT: I know.

GLENN: We're going to move on.

STU: Did you know, by the way, that you were actually mentioned in these e mails by these scientists? Did you realize this?

GLENN: No. Seriously?

STU: Yeah, that they were very because there's two guys that have been picking apart this scientific data for a long time, McKitrick and McIntyre. And they do these reports. They go through the numbers. They find holes in it and then it winds up coming out in places, you know, the few media sources who will actually report it. You were mentioned as one of them. They are very frustrated that these guys would come up with this analysis and then people like you would pick them up and you'd start talking about them. And that's why they talk about specifically changing the definition of a peer review journal. Because the problem is that these guys keep going to journals and some of them keep getting not these guys specifically but certain scientists go to these journals and they keep getting printed. And even if we have to go and we have to change the definition, we need to just, we need to boycott certain journals so they are no longer available, they are no longer respected as scientific sources.

GLENN: How is this

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: How is this story

STU: Huge story.

GLENN: There's only two stories. There is this story and there is the front page of the New York Times, the deficit story. Those are the only two stories that should be covered today. I haven't seen I've got three televisions in front of me today. I haven't seen these covered. I mean, are we done with the climate change?

PAT: No, about you they got to the New Moon record at the box office over the weekend. It got though that.

STU: Teenage vampires.

PAT: Oh, yeah, that's huge.

GLENN: Seriously are we done with the climate change scandal now? It was one day, it was a Friday and that was it?

PAT: Climate change could lead to more vampirism.

STU: Really?

GLENN: Which you don't want to have if you are taking do you have rubber gloves on your fangs?

PAT: No.

GLENN: It might be tainted gloves.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: How do you know?

PAT: Which leads directly to AIDS.

STU: And there is a scientific journal that might lead to that flat head thing that Frankenstein and the Muensters have, which is serious.

PAT: What about that little bolt in the neck? Could it cause that?

GLENN: Hang on. I'm looking at MSNBC and it is the GOP is politicizing breast cancer. So

STU: No way.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: That is the big story of the day.

PAT: Well, there you go. I guess we've been set straight.

GLENN: You know, when the truth doesn't matter anymore and this is another thing I was thinking about this weekend, and, you know, I don't know how to say this other than just to say it. If we don't set ourself right, if we don't reconnect with the values and the principles and quite honestly with God who brought the pilgrims here in the first place, if we don't reconnect with those things, we won't survive.

PAT: And we'll all be coastal prostitutes by the end of the year.

GLENN: Because don't know about that part. Because these representatives, these people in Washington, they represent us. If we don't set our lives back on the right course, we can never expect them to. They won't. Look at where they've gone.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" to explain how mail-in ballots are typically disqualified during recounts at a far higher rate than in-person, Election Day ballots, and why this is "good news" for President Donald Trump's legal battle over the election.

"One of the things that gives the greatest cause for optimism is, this election ... there's a pretty marked disparity in terms of how the votes were distributed. On Election Day, with in-person voting, Donald Trump won a significant majority of the votes cast on in-person voting on Election Day. Of mail-in voting, Joe Biden won a significant majority of the votes cast early on mail-in voting," Cruz explained.

"Now, here's the good news: If you look historically to recounts, if you look historically to election litigation, the votes cast in person on Election Day tend to stand. It's sort of hard to screw that up. Those votes are generally legal, and they're not set aside. Mail-in votes historically have a much higher rate of rejection … when they're examined, there are a whole series of legal requirements that vary state by state, but mail-in votes consistently have a higher rate of rejection, which suggests that as these votes begin being examined and subjected to scrutiny, that you're going to see Joe Biden's vote tallies go down. That's a good thing," he added. "The challenge is, for President Trump to prevail, he's got to run the table. He's got to win, not just in one state but in several states. That makes it a lot harder to prevail in the litigation. I hope that he does so, but it is a real challenge and we shouldn't try to convince ourselves otherwise."

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Subscribe to BlazeTV today with our BEST DEAL EVER for $30 off with promo code GLENN.

Fox News senior meteorologist Janice Dean is perhaps even more disgusted with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) for his coronavirus response than BlazeTV's Stu Burguiere (read what Stu has to say on the subject here), and for a good reason.

She lost both of her in-laws to COVID-19 in New York's nursing homes after Gov. Cuomo's infamous nursing home mandate, which Cuomo has since had scrubbed from the state's website and blamed everyone from the New York Post to nursing care workers to (every leftist's favorite scapegoat) President Donald Trump.

Janice joined Glenn and Stu on the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday to ask why mainstream media is not holding Gov. Cuomo — who recently published a book about his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic — accountable?

"I'm vocal because I have not seen the mainstream media ask these questions or demand accountability of their leaders. [Cuomo] really has been ruling with an iron fist, and every time he does get asked a question, he blames everybody else except the person that signed that order," Janice said.

"In my mind, he's profiting off the over 30 thousand New Yorkers, including my in-laws, that died by publishing a book on 'leadership' of New York," she added. "His order has helped kill thousands of relatives of New York state. And this is not political, Glenn. This is not about Republican or Democrat. My in-laws were registered Democrats. This is not about politics. This is about accountability for something that went wrong, and it's because of your [Cuomo's] leadership that we're put into this situation."

Watch the video excerpt from the show below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

As America grows divided and afraid to disagree with the Democrats' woke plan for America, Megyn Kelly is ready to fight back for the truth. For nearly two decades, she navigated the volatile and broken world of the media. But as America leans on independent voices more than ever, she's breaking new ground with "The Megyn Kelly Show."

She joined the latest Glenn Beck Podcast to break down what's coming next after the election: Black Lives Matter is mainstream, leftists are making lists of Trump supporters, and the Hunter Biden scandal is on the back burner.

Megyn and Glenn reminisce about their cable news days (including her infamous run-in with then-presidential candidate Donald Trump) and to look into the chaotic and shady world of journalism and the growing entitlement it's bred. For example, many conservatives have been shocked by how Fox News handled the election.

Megyn defended Fox News, saying she believes Fox News' mission "is a good one," but also didn't hold back on hosts like Neil Cavuto, who cut off a White House briefing to fact check it — something she never would have done, even while covering President Obama.

Megyn also shared this insightful takeaway from her time at NBC: "Jane Fonda was an ass."

Watch the full podcast here:

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Glenn Beck has had enough of exposing scandal after scandal, just to have everyone look the other way: Benghazi, Hillary Clinton's emails, Joe and Hunter Biden's dealings in Ukraine and China … the list goes on, but no consequences are paid. Now, the media have called the election for Joe Biden and insist no one can question it. But for many of the more than 71 million people who voted for President Trump, our search for the truth isn't over yet.

On his Wednesday night special this week, Glenn called out the left's long list of alleged corruption that has gone unchecked and stressed that Donald Trump's legal team must be allowed to go through the process of investigating the multiple allegations of election fraud to ensure our voting systems are fair.

"I don't know about you, but I'm tired. I am worn out. I am fed up!" Glenn said during his opening monologue. "I've had enough. I am tired of exposing corruption, doing our homework, even going overseas and having documents translated to make sure they're exactly right, [and] presenting the evidence ... except, once we expose it, nothing happens. Nobody goes to jail. Nobody pays for a damn thing any more!"

Watch the short video clip from the full show below:


Because the content of this show is sure to set off the Big Tech censors, the full episode is only be available on BlazeTV. The election and its aftermath are the most important stories in America, so we're offering our most timely discount ever: $30 off a one-year subscription to BlazeTV with code "GLENN."