Glenn Beck: The biggest scandal in American history


Evil Conservative Industries cares about conserving fuel - learn more...

GLENN: Hey, Stu, I thought of you on Friday because of the global warming computers that were hacked into.

STU: Amazing.

GLENN: I was on the road.

PAT: Great story.

GLENN: I haven't had a chance to follow this. I know we're going to cover it tonight. Give me all the ins and outs of this thing, you two.

STU: Well, basically it was a hacker went, broke into the computers of one of the main centers O' climate change, one of the biggest sort of alarmist group of scientists and hacked in and put out on the Internet thousands of e mails and documents.

PAT: This is going to be stunning. They showed, what did they show, Stu?

STU: They shockingly showed that they were manipulating evidence.

PAT: No!

GLENN: Is it true

PAT: Exaggerating the case, if you will.

GLENN: Is it true that the hockey stick thing great that guy is one of the guys on these e mails, Michael Mann who show people have been diving into these processes which most of the time he won't give up at all for people to look at because he knows how shady they are. But they have been looking into them for quite a while and have found you know, you look at some of these e mails here. They are, you know, talking about literally doing tricks to hide the decline of temperatures. That's how clear it is. I mean now, you know

GLENN: They use the word "Tricks."

PAT: Yeah, in quotations, tricks. Statistical tricks in the charts.

STU: Here it is. This is the quote. This is from one of the main scientists. I've just completed Mike's, which is Michael Mann, the guy we were just talking about, I just completed Mike's nature trick. Nature is a scientific term. So I've just completed Mike's nature trick of adding the real temps for each series the last 20 years and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline. They are talking about hiding the decline in temperatures by using tricks. Now, tricks may or may not mean, that doesn't necessarily mean something elicit. Maybe it's just something in the math. You could try to justify that.

GLENN: How do you justify hide the decline?

STU: Hide the decline, how do you justify that? Hide something, they are hiding something. Then they are multiple e mails.

GLENN: This is why they shout so hard.

PAT: Oh, yeah.

GLENN: That the debate is over. You can't debate it when you are into tricks.

STU: There are multiple e mails that show them conspiring to delete evidence, deleting e mails to avoid Freedom of Information Act requests, the U.K.'s version of the Freedom of Information Act. I mean, they are talking about please delete all e mails regarding this topic. And they have them. I mean, it's unbelievable. Honestly like in 100 years you'd never thought you'd have evidence that is this overwhelming.

GLENN: I'm telling you, I'm telling you I said this before, and again everybody made fun of me and probably still do on this. When all is said and done, in the end if there's anything left to tell the story, this is the biggest scandal in American history. These are the biggest events.

PAT: Global warming?

GLENN: No.

PAT: The whole thing?

GLENN: The whole

PAT: It is.

GLENN: Because these are the same people. These are progressives.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: It's the same people.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: This is the biggest story in American history because maybe world history because it is going to depending on who wins, it's either going to be cleaned up but collapse the system and we're going to have to start all over again because we untethered ourself from principles and we said character doesn't matter. Well, it does. And we either collapse and rebuild ourself and they will be remembered as the worst of the worst, or they will just take it and they will have won the entire world. But this is for all of the chips. This is it. This is the game.

PAT: And that's why they keep getting more and more absurd, bizarre and ridiculous every day. Like this, the effects of climate change have driven women in communities and coastal areas and poor countries into prostitution.

STU: Really?

PAT: Yes.

STU: So global warming now causes

PAT: Global warming. Here's the let me at least read the quote. Climate change I love this. Climate change could reduce income from farming and fishing. Hasn't yet.

STU: It could.

PAT: It could.

STU: Possible.

PAT: Climate change could reduce income from farming and fishing, possibly driving some women into sex work and thereby increasing HIV infection.

STU: Should, possibly, if.

PAT: Global climate change could, possibly and may increase AIDS.

GLENN: Hang on just a second. Show me the hockey stick. So you are saying the temperature of the Earth is causing people to get AIDS at a higher rate?

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: It may be the only reason of AIDS?

PAT: Don't you know, Glenn, because of your small mind that small brothels usually pop up near coastal areas where many women perform sexual services for transient seafarers? And when it gets hot and dry

GLENN: Transient seafarers?

PAT: When it gets hot and dry, they got no alternative.

GLENN: Got to pull into port.

PAT: Go straight into prostitution and service these seamen, if you will.

STU: There is an insurmountable amount of jokes.

PAT: I know.

GLENN: We're going to move on.

STU: Did you know, by the way, that you were actually mentioned in these e mails by these scientists? Did you realize this?

GLENN: No. Seriously?

STU: Yeah, that they were very because there's two guys that have been picking apart this scientific data for a long time, McKitrick and McIntyre. And they do these reports. They go through the numbers. They find holes in it and then it winds up coming out in places, you know, the few media sources who will actually report it. You were mentioned as one of them. They are very frustrated that these guys would come up with this analysis and then people like you would pick them up and you'd start talking about them. And that's why they talk about specifically changing the definition of a peer review journal. Because the problem is that these guys keep going to journals and some of them keep getting not these guys specifically but certain scientists go to these journals and they keep getting printed. And even if we have to go and we have to change the definition, we need to just, we need to boycott certain journals so they are no longer available, they are no longer respected as scientific sources.

GLENN: How is this

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: How is this story

STU: Huge story.

GLENN: There's only two stories. There is this story and there is the front page of the New York Times, the deficit story. Those are the only two stories that should be covered today. I haven't seen I've got three televisions in front of me today. I haven't seen these covered. I mean, are we done with the climate change?

PAT: No, about you they got to the New Moon record at the box office over the weekend. It got though that.

STU: Teenage vampires.

PAT: Oh, yeah, that's huge.

GLENN: Seriously are we done with the climate change scandal now? It was one day, it was a Friday and that was it?

PAT: Climate change could lead to more vampirism.

STU: Really?

GLENN: Which you don't want to have if you are taking do you have rubber gloves on your fangs?

PAT: No.

GLENN: It might be tainted gloves.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: How do you know?

PAT: Which leads directly to AIDS.

STU: And there is a scientific journal that might lead to that flat head thing that Frankenstein and the Muensters have, which is serious.

PAT: What about that little bolt in the neck? Could it cause that?

GLENN: Hang on. I'm looking at MSNBC and it is the GOP is politicizing breast cancer. So

STU: No way.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: That is the big story of the day.

PAT: Well, there you go. I guess we've been set straight.

GLENN: You know, when the truth doesn't matter anymore and this is another thing I was thinking about this weekend, and, you know, I don't know how to say this other than just to say it. If we don't set ourself right, if we don't reconnect with the values and the principles and quite honestly with God who brought the pilgrims here in the first place, if we don't reconnect with those things, we won't survive.

PAT: And we'll all be coastal prostitutes by the end of the year.

GLENN: Because don't know about that part. Because these representatives, these people in Washington, they represent us. If we don't set our lives back on the right course, we can never expect them to. They won't. Look at where they've gone.

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.