Glenn Beck: Dems raise debt ceiling


Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Webcam, an exclusive feature available only to Glenn Beck Insiders. Learn more...

GLENN: Oh, man, all right. So here is the, here's the latest, if I may. On its face, the probability of the U.S. defaulting on its spiraling debts seems highly unlikely. But that's not what the market now thinks. The price of insurance against a default, using derivatives uh oh, there's a bad word, using derivatives known as credit default swaps uh oh, there are three words that got us into trouble has jumped by more than 50% in the private market in recent months. According to CMA Datavision in London, a specialist in these kinds of contracts, it will now cost you .34% of the principal per year to buy default insurance on U.S. Government bonds. If you held $1 million in treasuries, insuring against the default will cost you $3400 for the year. Just a few months back, insuring those bonds would have cost less than $2,000 a year.

Let me explain this. You buy these, you buy an insurance policy. It's like you buy an insurance policy for your house. You're going to have to pay it off. You are going to have to you know, you are going to be stuck with it. So if something happens to it, you want to make sure you can get your investment, right? It's the same thing, except the only way your houses burn down is usually, you know, there has to be an electrical problem or a toaster or, you know, there's an arsonist or whatever. When you have a million dollars in treasuries, you just have to worry about the arsonist that is the United States congress, treasury, the Fed and the president. I've been warning you about the arsony that is arsony? Larceny.

STU: I like that because that is

GLENN: It should be arsony actually because it is larceny and arson at the same time combined.

STU: I like it, yeah.

GLENN: Arsony, larceny. Arsony. You have to worry about the arsonists that are burning down the U.S. dollar. So you would have to buy insurance for that. Well, you don't really need a lot of insurance. The U.S. dollar ain't going anywhere... right?

Let me continue to read: For investors the greatest danger is not that America could formally default on its debts. Why is that? Why is there no fear that America will default on their debts? We're concerned that banks would default, homeowners would default, California could default. Why doesn't the United States, why is no one worried that the United States will default on their debts?

PAT: We have printing presses.

GLENN: Exactly right. Governments don't default because they can print the money. For investors the greatest danger is not that America could formally default on its debts. It's that the government may informally default by unleashing inflation. It's hard now to see any other outcome. Anyone holding long term treasury bonds should demand pretty high listen to this. Now, here's the other shoe to fall. Make sure you have it. Investors are now saying this is risky. The insurance companies are now saying we need more money to insure a million dollars worth of treasuries because it's becoming more risky that the United States government will informally default by printing too much money and hyperinflation. Remember, I told you this at least a year ago, maybe two years ago. Read the Weimar Republic. That was insane. That was a conspiracy theory. That will never happy. Now the people if you believe in the free market, the people who have their money at stake are now saying, "Maybe we should increase that. Anyone holding long term interest treasury bonds should demand pretty high annual interest rates to compensate for the risks. So in other words, what are they saying? Don't take a 30 year treasury at 4.4% interest rate. I need an 8% interest rate, or whatever, 6%, 8%, 10%, 12%. Whatever the people who buy 30 year bonds and we're not talking about you.

PAT: Can I get 1600%?

GLENN: Yeah, I know. Talking, not talking about you. We're talking about the people who buy them in bulk. Who are those people? Remember, we now, most of our debt, or at least most of our new debt is on six can you imagine getting a six month revolving loan? These aren't 30 years. These are six months. So every six months we have to go and ask the bank basically, China, for another loan: Okay, could you guys carry this over another six months? Oh, and by the way, we want to add this to it. We're now trying to get anybody to buy longer term treasuries. What they're saying is don't do it. If you're going to try, if you are going to hold that money for 30 years, do you think 4% is worth that risk? Demand more. Why is that a bad thing? Because that means to borrow money, we have to pay it's just like your home loan. If you get a mortgage and it's 4% interest, that's what the yield is. This is our mortgage for our country. 4% interest, okay, that's not bad. For a 30 year house loan? Okay, that's good. I'll pay 4%. Now, are you going to be able to afford that house at 6%? 8%? 10%? The people who can buy the house, especially if you're somebody who you're already mortgaged to the limit, you just don't have any more money, what caused this financial problem? The reset of the loan. The reset of the mortgage interest rate. That's when people started losing their home. That's what this means. The 30 year treasury. The 10 year treasury. It's too low of an interest rate, and the world needs to demand a higher interest rate. That means anything they're conning you into believing that we can now afford, the loans are about to reset. And when they do, can we afford to make that payment? The answer is no. If you look at what our interest payment will be, you read about it in Common Sense, it is worse than what I described in Common Sense. That's now out. There's two million copies now that have sold. Common Sense is almost at the two million books sold. That doesn't happen. Two million books sold. I described that when people read it back in the summer, people said, that can't be right. I looked at some of the research: That can't be right. It's now worse because of the things that we have done. And those aren't my numbers. Those are from, like, whitehouse.gov. What I wrote about in Common Sense six or eight months ago was that we are going to have an interest payment about the size of the stimulus package every single year, an interest payment. If I said at the time, if everything goes well, we are guaranteed by, I think it's 2019, to pay almost $800 billion every month in interest alone. That's one stimulus package every single year... if the interest rate doesn't go up. The interest rate is going to go up. I am having now the same conversation that I had in 2003? I remember it vividly. I was in Philadelphia. And Stu, I was looking at you just like I'm looking at you now and said, help me out with the math. That doesn't work. Because if you can only afford the payment of that house now when there is 0% interest, what happens when you have 4% interest? Or 6 or 8. Oh, don't worry, things will get better. Don't do it. Do you remember? I am now having the same conversation with you about our federal government. We can afford this no, no, we cannot afford this. We cannot afford what we have now. We are bankrupt. The only reason why we don't, you don't see the stories on the news is because we have a printing press! We are in worse shape than California, but we have a printing press! And we haven't had an upgrade in our interest rates, but the banks of the world, the Chinas of the world, the individual investors of the world are going to begin to demand soon higher interest rates. When that happens, our loans reset. Then what do we do? There will only be one thing we can do: Inflate the money. Or... tax at, what, 80% for everyone? Remember, to pay off just the first debt, the first $12 trillion which next year will be $14.4 trillion, to pay the first $12 trillion, we have to take last year's Fortune 500 companies' profit, all 500 of them, all of the profit that they made and seize every dollar of that profit, for 145 years. That would pay off the first $12 trillion. We have unfunded liabilities, which means we have no funding for it whatsoever. The $12 trillion is what we owe China. We owe them that. What we have promised we are going to give people is $106 trillion. Please, please, buy gold! Sell everything you have and just buy gold! Buy it now! It's crazy!

STU: (Laughing).

GLENN: Please, get out of debt and look at the world with different eyes. Somebody's got to be a leader. Somebody's got to be a leader.

Everything comes down to the two Senate runoffs in Georgia. If we lose both races, we lose the country. Democrats know this and are pouring in millions to usher in a Marxist agenda.

As the Left tries to hide how radical the two candidates really are, Glenn takes us inside the Democrat war room to expose the wolf in pastor's clothing, Raphael Warnock, and America's Justin Trudeau, Jon Ossoff. Socialism, the Green New Deal, and "defund the police" are all on the table. And Glenn warns of what's to come if conservatives don't activate: Chuck Schumer will weaponize the Senate, and the radical Left will launch an all-out assault to ravage the Constitution.

Watch the full special below:

The election and its aftermath are the most important stories in America. That's why we're offering our most timely discount ever: $30 off a one-year subscription to BlazeTV with code "GLENN." With BlazeTV, you get the unvarnished truth from the most pro-America network in the country, free from Big Tech and MSM censors.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" to explain how mail-in ballots are typically disqualified during recounts at a far higher rate than in-person, Election Day ballots, and why this is "good news" for President Donald Trump's legal battle over the election.

"One of the things that gives the greatest cause for optimism is, this election ... there's a pretty marked disparity in terms of how the votes were distributed. On Election Day, with in-person voting, Donald Trump won a significant majority of the votes cast on in-person voting on Election Day. Of mail-in voting, Joe Biden won a significant majority of the votes cast early on mail-in voting," Cruz explained.

"Now, here's the good news: If you look historically to recounts, if you look historically to election litigation, the votes cast in person on Election Day tend to stand. It's sort of hard to screw that up. Those votes are generally legal, and they're not set aside. Mail-in votes historically have a much higher rate of rejection … when they're examined, there are a whole series of legal requirements that vary state by state, but mail-in votes consistently have a higher rate of rejection, which suggests that as these votes begin being examined and subjected to scrutiny, that you're going to see Joe Biden's vote tallies go down. That's a good thing," he added. "The challenge is, for President Trump to prevail, he's got to run the table. He's got to win, not just in one state but in several states. That makes it a lot harder to prevail in the litigation. I hope that he does so, but it is a real challenge and we shouldn't try to convince ourselves otherwise."

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Subscribe to BlazeTV today with our BEST DEAL EVER for $30 off with promo code GLENN.

Fox News senior meteorologist Janice Dean is perhaps even more disgusted with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) for his coronavirus response than BlazeTV's Stu Burguiere (read what Stu has to say on the subject here), and for a good reason.

She lost both of her in-laws to COVID-19 in New York's nursing homes after Gov. Cuomo's infamous nursing home mandate, which Cuomo has since had scrubbed from the state's website and blamed everyone from the New York Post to nursing care workers to (every leftist's favorite scapegoat) President Donald Trump.

Janice joined Glenn and Stu on the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday to ask why mainstream media is not holding Gov. Cuomo — who recently published a book about his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic — accountable?

"I'm vocal because I have not seen the mainstream media ask these questions or demand accountability of their leaders. [Cuomo] really has been ruling with an iron fist, and every time he does get asked a question, he blames everybody else except the person that signed that order," Janice said.

"In my mind, he's profiting off the over 30 thousand New Yorkers, including my in-laws, that died by publishing a book on 'leadership' of New York," she added. "His order has helped kill thousands of relatives of New York state. And this is not political, Glenn. This is not about Republican or Democrat. My in-laws were registered Democrats. This is not about politics. This is about accountability for something that went wrong, and it's because of your [Cuomo's] leadership that we're put into this situation."

Watch the video excerpt from the show below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

As America grows divided and afraid to disagree with the Democrats' woke plan for America, Megyn Kelly is ready to fight back for the truth. For nearly two decades, she navigated the volatile and broken world of the media. But as America leans on independent voices more than ever, she's breaking new ground with "The Megyn Kelly Show."

She joined the latest Glenn Beck Podcast to break down what's coming next after the election: Black Lives Matter is mainstream, leftists are making lists of Trump supporters, and the Hunter Biden scandal is on the back burner.

Megyn and Glenn reminisce about their cable news days (including her infamous run-in with then-presidential candidate Donald Trump) and to look into the chaotic and shady world of journalism and the growing entitlement it's bred. For example, many conservatives have been shocked by how Fox News handled the election.

Megyn defended Fox News, saying she believes Fox News' mission "is a good one," but also didn't hold back on hosts like Neil Cavuto, who cut off a White House briefing to fact check it — something she never would have done, even while covering President Obama.

Megyn also shared this insightful takeaway from her time at NBC: "Jane Fonda was an ass."

Watch the full podcast here:

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.