Glenn Beck: Gore not sweating ClimateGate



Video: Al Gore on Andrea Mitchell

PAT: Well, Al Gore's infallible and he stuck to that yesterday. In the Andrea Mitchell interview here's some of what Al Gore had to say.

GORE: The global warming deniers persist in this era of unreality. After all, the entire North polar icecap which has been there for most of the last three million years is disappearing before our eyes.

PAT: Right before our eyes.

GORE: 40%'s already gone. The rest is expected to go completely within the next decade. What do they think is causing this? The mountain glaciers in every region of the world are melting, many of them at an accelerated rate, threatening drinking supplies, drinking water supplies and agricultural water supplies. We have these record storms, droughts, floods, fires.

STU: Record lows even?

GORE: Three lows in the American West, climate refugees beginning now, expected to rise to the hundreds of millions unless we take action.

PAT: Where are the climate refugees?

STU: Oh, my I can't tell you how many climate refugees showed up at my house last night.

PAT: At your house? They are all there? Really?

STU: They are all there in the backyard. That's where they live. They leave the climate from down the street and they take refuge in my backyard because I'm high ground, Pat. I can

PAT: Everything around you's underwater?

STU: In let's say 10,000 years when the waters rise 20 feet, I'm going to be the only house above water. And that's why the climate refugees have gathered at my home.

PAT: Will you care in 10,000 years?

STU: Well, you know what, I care about the Earth. I care about our children, our children's children, our children's children's children. Not so much about the children's children's children but the children's children's children's children.

PAT: So you'll care for a while, the first 1500 to 2,000 years you'll care.

STU: Right. But after that, screw them.

PAT: Now, I know you've done a lot of studying, too, and I've looked into it, too, but is there anything to 40% of the polar ice caps disappeared?

STU: Well, you know

PAT: 40% has already disappeared. It's gone.

STU: You know, I've been trying to track this stat down. I always find it fascinating to look back and trace what they've done. I mean, anyone can throw it out there and you could say, all right, 40%, that's not right. But to go back and find the thought process they used to justify bringing this up on a national talk show I always find to be interesting. Looking I mean, I think what he's talking about is the sea ice extent, and you look at this and if you measure it like, because 40% sounds like this big thing. But I mean, it goes from, you know, it drops I'd say I'm just looking at the chart off the top of my head here, dropped 60% by itself from winter to summer. I mean, that's what it does. It melts and it goes back up.

PAT: That's just normal process.

STU: Right. So I think what he's doing is he is picking the absolute lowest number, like the lowest point on the chart where this, where the sea ice melt is would be most significant percentage wise. So instead of picking it at the top of the peak where it would be like 10%, you go to the very bottom of the peak and find the lowest possible point so that will extend it. I still can't get a 40% reading yet.

PAT: Yeah.

STU: But I can at least get, I can get into the double digits. Indiana find a little bit higher than that. I'm trying to, you know, e mail around to some of the sort of scientists we go back and forth with. I can't find it.

PAT: And then in ten years the polar icecap will be completely gone? Where do they get this madness?

STU: They predict this every year.

PAT: I know.

STU: If you remember, this past

PAT: They said by summer.

STU: And they said this for several years. One of, I'm trying to think, was it this year or was it last year that a boat tried to go all the way through because they said, there's not going to be any ice, so we could boat through. And then they just got surrounded by ice and stuck in the middle of the ice.

PAT: Yeah, yeah.

STU: I mean, they say this every single year. As you know, there's it's always catastrophe. But the bottom line is what Al Gore's talking about, even if he were true, does not prove his point.

PAT: No, it doesn't.

STU: We acknowledge that there's been

PAT: There's volcanic activity, there's all kinds of things at play. What do they think it is? It could be anything, Al! The sun! I hate to bring this up but there's a two million degree burning orb in the sky. The sun!

STU: We do believe that there's been a .7 degrees temperature warm in 100 years.

PAT: Yeah.

STU: That's something we do believe, that's something that scientists believe.

PAT: Although hasn't that been wiped out already in the last several or has it?

STU: I would say no. It's still level gone up. As I think what you're pointing to is the cooling that has happened over the past, you know, give or take eleven years.

PAT: Yes.

STU: Which is, it's not, it's still higher than it was 100 years ago. It has lost some of the overall gain from 1998. But the bottom line here, though, is the fight is not about whether the temperature has risen or that the majority of the warming has been up in the polar region.

PAT: It's about what's causing it.

STU: It's about what's causing it.

PAT: And what can we do about it even if we are causing it. And your stupid proposals don't fix it. Not even close, even if everything you say is true.

STU: If you get past all this other stuff and you accept all that's what I loved about, we had the guys on from super freakonomics.

PAT: Yeah.

STU: And they are not acting skeptical to any scientific finding whatsoever. They are accepting everything Al Gore's says

PAT: They would say that.

STU: Exactly. And they just look at it as what's the best solution? What makes sense for our country, our future, our children's children's children's children, all of those people that we're supposed to care about and making sense of sort of policy arrangement. And when you look at it that way, you can't find any rational path to what Al Gore says.

PAT: Absolutely none. After he said this, I was doing some searching. I couldn't find any like you, I couldn't find any backing for the 40% is already gone claim. The closest I came to finding anything about 40% is that about according to some Seattle scientists they say about 40% of the ice that usually blankets the top of the world during summer will be gone by 2050. So it's another one of those dire predictions that if we don't act now, blah, blah blah, this will happen.

STU: Right, all based on models that plug in Al Gore's theory.

PAT: Exactly. All based on models, none of which predicted the current cooling trend.

STU: No.

PAT: Not one of them predicted the current cooling trend.

STU: A lot of this has to do with it's interesting because Al Gore says it in that clip you just played, which is, I don't know what it is I can't do it like you. I don't know what it is. If it's not this, tell me what it is. Well, that's not science.

PAT: No, it's not.

STU: That's guessing, okay? When you don't know what the cause of something is and you just apply the cause you think it might be, that's a guess!

PAT: Yes.

STU: That's a guesstimate.

PAT: Well, and he does that all the time. He did that on what show was he on when he did the million degree Earth thing? Was it Conan O'Brien a couple of weeks ago when he said this:

O'BRIEN: Is this a viable solution, geothermal?

GORE: It definitely is, and it's a relatively new one. People think about geothermal energy, when they think about it at all, in terms of the hot water bubbling up in some places.

PAT: Bubbling up.

GORE: But two kilometers or so down, in most places there are these incredibly hot rocks because the interior of the Earth is extremely hot, several million degrees.

PAT: Several million degrees!

STU: Million degrees!

PAT: The rocks a couple of miles down in the Earth are hotter than the surface of the sun!

STU: (Laughing).

PAT: That is news. I don't know why that didn't go out everywhere to science journals because that's news.

STU: I can't even imagine what that would do to the 57 states if that were true.

PAT: Let alone, you know, the, the moon, Venus, Mars, Jupiter.

STU: Seriously.

PAT: Come on!

STU: I think at that point Saturn would be like a tropical locale with this scenario.

PAT: Several million degrees. The sun is two million when you go two miles out, I think because the surface is like 11,000 degrees or something. But then it mixes with the atmosphere and causes this reaction that creates a two million degree temperature a couple of miles out from the sun. And then that spreads through the solar system. The center of the Earth is about 12,000 degrees. 12,000.

STU: Well, look, you

PAT: Not millions.

STU: I mean, you can spin your numbers.

PAT: It's not even close.

STU: You can spin your numbers all you want, but 12,000 and 2 million are basically the same.

PAT: All right, I stand corrected.

STU: I mean, those numbers, look, there's a few other zeroes on there.

PAT: Yes, right.

STU: But zeroes as we know have no value. So

PAT: Who's counting. Who's counting.

Everything comes down to the two Senate runoffs in Georgia. If we lose both races, we lose the country. Democrats know this and are pouring in millions to usher in a Marxist agenda.

As the Left tries to hide how radical the two candidates really are, Glenn takes us inside the Democrat war room to expose the wolf in pastor's clothing, Raphael Warnock, and America's Justin Trudeau, Jon Ossoff. Socialism, the Green New Deal, and "defund the police" are all on the table. And Glenn warns of what's to come if conservatives don't activate: Chuck Schumer will weaponize the Senate, and the radical Left will launch an all-out assault to ravage the Constitution.

Watch the full special below:

The election and its aftermath are the most important stories in America. That's why we're offering our most timely discount ever: $30 off a one-year subscription to BlazeTV with code "GLENN." With BlazeTV, you get the unvarnished truth from the most pro-America network in the country, free from Big Tech and MSM censors.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" to explain how mail-in ballots are typically disqualified during recounts at a far higher rate than in-person, Election Day ballots, and why this is "good news" for President Donald Trump's legal battle over the election.

"One of the things that gives the greatest cause for optimism is, this election ... there's a pretty marked disparity in terms of how the votes were distributed. On Election Day, with in-person voting, Donald Trump won a significant majority of the votes cast on in-person voting on Election Day. Of mail-in voting, Joe Biden won a significant majority of the votes cast early on mail-in voting," Cruz explained.

"Now, here's the good news: If you look historically to recounts, if you look historically to election litigation, the votes cast in person on Election Day tend to stand. It's sort of hard to screw that up. Those votes are generally legal, and they're not set aside. Mail-in votes historically have a much higher rate of rejection … when they're examined, there are a whole series of legal requirements that vary state by state, but mail-in votes consistently have a higher rate of rejection, which suggests that as these votes begin being examined and subjected to scrutiny, that you're going to see Joe Biden's vote tallies go down. That's a good thing," he added. "The challenge is, for President Trump to prevail, he's got to run the table. He's got to win, not just in one state but in several states. That makes it a lot harder to prevail in the litigation. I hope that he does so, but it is a real challenge and we shouldn't try to convince ourselves otherwise."

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Subscribe to BlazeTV today with our BEST DEAL EVER for $30 off with promo code GLENN.

Fox News senior meteorologist Janice Dean is perhaps even more disgusted with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) for his coronavirus response than BlazeTV's Stu Burguiere (read what Stu has to say on the subject here), and for a good reason.

She lost both of her in-laws to COVID-19 in New York's nursing homes after Gov. Cuomo's infamous nursing home mandate, which Cuomo has since had scrubbed from the state's website and blamed everyone from the New York Post to nursing care workers to (every leftist's favorite scapegoat) President Donald Trump.

Janice joined Glenn and Stu on the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday to ask why mainstream media is not holding Gov. Cuomo — who recently published a book about his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic — accountable?

"I'm vocal because I have not seen the mainstream media ask these questions or demand accountability of their leaders. [Cuomo] really has been ruling with an iron fist, and every time he does get asked a question, he blames everybody else except the person that signed that order," Janice said.

"In my mind, he's profiting off the over 30 thousand New Yorkers, including my in-laws, that died by publishing a book on 'leadership' of New York," she added. "His order has helped kill thousands of relatives of New York state. And this is not political, Glenn. This is not about Republican or Democrat. My in-laws were registered Democrats. This is not about politics. This is about accountability for something that went wrong, and it's because of your [Cuomo's] leadership that we're put into this situation."

Watch the video excerpt from the show below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

As America grows divided and afraid to disagree with the Democrats' woke plan for America, Megyn Kelly is ready to fight back for the truth. For nearly two decades, she navigated the volatile and broken world of the media. But as America leans on independent voices more than ever, she's breaking new ground with "The Megyn Kelly Show."

She joined the latest Glenn Beck Podcast to break down what's coming next after the election: Black Lives Matter is mainstream, leftists are making lists of Trump supporters, and the Hunter Biden scandal is on the back burner.

Megyn and Glenn reminisce about their cable news days (including her infamous run-in with then-presidential candidate Donald Trump) and to look into the chaotic and shady world of journalism and the growing entitlement it's bred. For example, many conservatives have been shocked by how Fox News handled the election.

Megyn defended Fox News, saying she believes Fox News' mission "is a good one," but also didn't hold back on hosts like Neil Cavuto, who cut off a White House briefing to fact check it — something she never would have done, even while covering President Obama.

Megyn also shared this insightful takeaway from her time at NBC: "Jane Fonda was an ass."

Watch the full podcast here:

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.