Glenn Beck: Does Congress read before voting?

GLENN: We're going to have to make sacrifices and choices now and so it's going to test the bands of social cohesion. We are in headed for trouble, but there's all kinds of and tonight on television I'm going this segment tonight on just the vice, the vice that is going to start squeezing all Americans, not left or right, all Americans. And so the pot is going to start to boil. It's going to get hotter and hotter and hotter and tensions are going to get rise higher and higher and higher. Got it? That's just the way it's going to be. One of those people in the vice is what's actually in this bill, what they've actually done. Here's one of them and Pat has the audio vault and explain set this up.

PAT: A reporter, a young guy walked into the halls of Congress, into the Capitol, and was walking down the hallway with Alan Grayson and was just introducing himself and being very friendly and talking about the health care bill and congratulating him on having such a big part of its passage. So, Grayson is warming up to him and starts to ask him about his favorite parts of the bill and the reporter asked Grayson what he liked best about it and Grayson starts telling him. And then he says, Well, what about these other provisions that are in the bill?



Why would Alan Grayson want to give your money over to Native American child molesters?

VOICE: What about the House, the house portion that provides funding for Native American child molesters and the Senate portion that provides

VOICE: (Inaudible.)

VOICE: that mandates no. This is the bill.

VOICE: It doesn't sound like it.

VOICE: This is in your bill that you voted for.

VOICE: Okay. Have a nice day.

VOICE: 1950 provides funding for Native American is this not in your bill? Do you not know what's in your own bill that you voted for?

GLENN: That is so great.

PAT: And then there's

VOICE: the Senate bill that says employers must mandate a break time for breast feeding. This is also in your bill.

VOICE: Get a life. What about getting a life?

GLENN: You're a Congressman, sir. Your life is to represent the people, not the Native American child molesters.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: And you notice they don't respond. They never do.

PAT: No.

GLENN: They never do.

PAT: And you notice was the response was, when he told him about the provision that is in the bill

GLENN: What? Are you crazy?

PAT: Are you a kook? Are you a kook for voting for this thing? I didn't put in it there. I didn't vote for it. You did.

GLENN: Can you that's video, right?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Not just audio?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Could you send that over to TV so we could show that video tonight? And let's put that in the free e mail newsletter today.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Because that is the kind of stuff you need. That shows you a couple of things. One, the kind of pressure that is coming your way, because look what's in the bill. Look what's in the bill. Two, look at what they've done. They don't even know what's in the bill.

PAT: No. Of course they don't.

GLENN: They didn't read it.

PAT: They have no idea.

GLENN: And why is it bad to now ask the questions of what's in the bill, because that's what we were told by Nancy Pelosi, you have to wait until the fog clears, we have to pass it and then you'll see what's in the bill. Okay. So, now we're seeing it. You still don't want to answer questions about it? We're seeing it now.

And then the last thing you have to learn about this is: What have they done? As soon as you do ask, because that's what Nancy Pelosi told us to do, Wait until it's passed and then you'll be able to see it. We see it, we read it, and then we ask and they call us a kook! I mean, I never you know, I never related and I still don't think we can relate, but I could never relate to the founders on the Declaration of Independence, on that big, long list where they said, We've tried and we've tried and we've tried and we've tried, we've begged you, we've begged you, we've told you, please don't do this. Then we appealed to the British people and said, Please. That's the only thing that we haven't done yet, I guess, is appeal to the good Democrats. I have, but we haven't appealed to the good Democrats and say, Help us, please, help us. Help us. You love the country as much as we do. You're not in with these radicals. You're not come on. You are not for giving money for child molesters in Native American communities. You're not for that! Help us, please, please.

And I have a great faith, because I've seen it, I've seen it, and that's why they have to paint us as violent, because they cannot let anybody on the left peel off. They can't let anybody from the Democrats peel off and come over here. They've got to pulverize their base, they've got to make us into haters and racists, because you've seen it. I have friends, I have strong democratic friends who have said, Glenn, I can't do it anymore. I can't do it. I mean, I have I don't want to give names. Hang on just a second.

Okay. Do you know who she is?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Okay. I just said to Pat the name of the person I'm talking about. Could you meet a stauncher liberal?

PAT: I don't think so.

Glenn: Okay.

PAT: I don't think so.

GLENN: This is a woman who, I mean, makes my head explode.

PAT: Uh huh.

GLENN: Her husband came in this week and said, Glenn, I just want you to know, she can't do it anymore. She can't do it anymore. The lies, the corruption, what they're doing, she's not with it. That's incredible. That is incredible. When you have people who are lifelong Democrats and liberals who say, I can't stand with these people, we must reach out to those people, we must find our way to those people. We must find our way to the reasonable Democrats. It cannot be about politics. It must be about values and principles. It must be about honor an integrity. It must be about those things, and that's the exact opposite direction of where they're going. Where they were campaigning and they wanted to make it about hope, now they're making it about fear. That is a losing hand. In the end it is a losing hand, but if God is with us, who could stand against us? Churches, boy, oh, boy, do we need you. Boy, does America need churches. Our faiths must come together, they must come together. We need a Christian coalition, but I think and I don't speak for Christians, by any stretch of the imagination, but I think the Christian coalition was used by politics and politicians. I think the Christian coalition, the problem with that thing is it became about politics and about a party. This has to be about principles. We need a Christian coalition that is about principles and not parties. We must come together again. We must. We must come together as neighbors and friends and Americans and put our parties last and our principles first.

We did our homework over the weekend; we did the research so we can tell you what is likely coming from Senate Democrats regarding President Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett. Based on our research and the anonymous people who have already come forward to talk about Coney Barrett's youth, these are the main shocking things you can expect Senate Democrats to seize on during the confirmation process…

A man has come forward under the banner of "#MenToo," to say that in second grade, Amy Coney Barrett and her best friend at the time, cornered him at a birthday party at Chuck-E-Cheese and "injected him with a full dose of cooties." Which, if true, would obviously be disqualifying for serving on the highest court in the land.

Then there's a woman who says when she was nine-years-old, she lived on the same street as Amy Coney Barrett. She alleges that Coney-Barrett borrowed her VHS tape of Herbie Goes Bananas and did not return it for at least six months. And then when she did finally get the tape back, the woman says Coney Barrett did not even bother to rewind it. The FBI has interviewed at least two witnesses so far who say the tape was indeed not rewound and that it was very upsetting to the owner of the tape. Again, if true, this is troubling – clearly not the kind of integrity you want to see in a Supreme Court justice.

Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it.

The same neighbor also dropped a bombshell allegation about the drinking problem of Amy Coney Barrett and her closest friends. Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it. The neighbor says she "frequently" witnessed Coney-Barrett and her friends chugging entire cartons of milk – often Whole Milk, sometimes Chocolate Milk, occasionally both at the same time through a funnel.

Unfortunately, shooting-up cooties, injurious rewinding, and potential calcium-abuse are not even the worst of it.

A third person has now come forward, another man, and this is just reprehensible, it's hard to even fathom. But he alleges that in fourth grade, when they were around ten-years-old, Amy Coney Barrett and a group of "four or five of her friends" gang-GRAPED him on the playground during recess. He alleges the group of friends snuck uneaten grapes out of the cafeteria and gang-GRAPED him repeatedly in broad daylight. In other words, and I hate to have to spell this out because it's kind of graphic, but the group led by ten-year-old Amy Coney Barrett pelted this poor defenseless boy with whole grapes. He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

Obviously, even if just one of these allegations is half-true, no Senator with a conscience could possibly vote to confirm Coney Barrett. When there is a clear pattern of destructive childhood behavior, it always continues into adulthood. Because people do not change. Ever.

Fortunately, for the sake of the Republic, Democrats plan to subpoena Coney Barrett's childhood diary, to see what, if any, insights it may provide into her calcium habits, as well as her abuse of illicit cooties and the gang-GRAPING incident.

We will keep you posted on the latest, but for now, it looks like Democrats will find plenty in the reckless pre-teen life of Amy Coney Barrett to cast doubt on her nomination. And if not, they can always fall back on her deranged preference for letting babies be born.

[NOTE: The preceding was a parody written by MRA writer Nathan Nipper.]

On the radio program Friday, Glenn Beck discussed the recent news that a primary source for the Steele Dossier — the document on which much of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation was based — had been investigated by the FBI for contacts with suspected Russian spies. Glenn also shared several previously unpublished texts and emails from FBI agents have recently been released.

According to a letter sent by Attorney General William Barr to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday, the FBI knew early on that the research compiled by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele relied on a "Primary Sub-source" that had been "the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011 that assessed his or her contacts with suspected Russian intelligence officers" — but still used it to obtain warrants to spy on former Trump campaign-aide Carter Page.

But, it gets even worse. Now, new leaked texts and communications from FBI agents within the department at the time of the entire Russian collusion effort were disclosed in federal court filings on Thursday. According to the court documents, FBI agents purchased "professional liability insurance" to protect themselves in January 2017, just weeks before Donald Trump was inaugurated president, because they were concerned about the agency's potentially illegal activity during the Russia collusion investigation.

"Trump was right," one FBI employee wrote in response to then-President-elect Trump's Jan 3, 2017 tweet which read: "The 'Intelligence' briefing on so-called 'Russian hacking' was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Chief researcher Jason Buttrill joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to discuss an "explosive" new report released Wednesday by Senate Republicans on Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

Among other serious allegations, the 87-page report claims that "Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow," and the richest woman in Russia.

"The transactions discussed [in the report] are designed to illustrate the depth and extent of some questionable financial transactions. Moreover, the financial transactions illustrate serious counterintelligence and extortion concerns relating to Hunter Biden and his family," the report stated.

Jason suggested the Senate's findings provide additional evidence to back allegations of a money-laundering scheme, which Glenn detailed in a four-part series about Biden's shady connections to Ukraine. Learn more on this here.

"Laundered money is very hard to track to its finality," Jason explained. "I'm sure the Biden camp is really hoping that it just looks suspicious, but [investigators] don't ever find the eventual end point. But, if they do – and it's possible they already have – this is going to be explosive, very explosive."

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Revolutions rarely happen overnight. The Left started laying the groundwork for November 3, 2020, the moment Hillary Clinton had to concede the 2016 election to Donald Trump. It was always solely about getting rid of President Trump — and there's a playbook for that.

Last week, Glenn Beck showed you the "Seven Pillars of Color Revolution" written by a former U.S. diplomat, which are the conditions that must be in place for a successful Eastern European-style "Color Revolution." The left seems to be pushing for a Color Revolution this election because they are using the exact same playbook.

In part two of this series, Glenn peels back the layers on the first four of these Color Revolution pillars to show you how they work and what the end goal is. And he reveals one of the architects of the playbook – a Color Revolution specialist, former ambassador, and former Obama administration official who is one of the key masterminds of this revolution.

Joining Glenn is political campaign veteran and BlazeTV host Steve Deace who says the polls that claim Biden is leading the race "are trash." We're being set up to believe that if Trump wins in spite of the polls, it must be an invalid election.

Watch the full video below:


WATCH all of Glenn's Specials on BlazeTV:

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Save $10 with promo code GLENN.