Blog
LatestArticlesVideos
Radio
LivePodcastSerialsStations
TV
Podcast
Fine Art
Real Estate
More
AboutCharityBooksSponsorsShopContact
SEARCH
Live Radio

©2023 MERCURY RADIO ARTS.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY

Live

Glenn's Show Prep

Glenn Beck: If you can't beat em...cheat!

March 26, 2010
Radio Clips

The Glenn Beck Program


Glenn Beck's American Revival


Glenn Beck's American Revival is a daylong event where you can find information, inspiration, and the preparation to help turn this country around...


 - Tickets now available!

GLENN: So, can you give me the quote from Ed Schultz here ant fairness doctrine a year ago?

STU: Yes, I can do that for you.

Glenn: Hang on. Let me start with this. This is from yesterday. Here's Ed Schultz from yesterday.

ED SCHULTZ: It is a cultural war that's taking place in America. You're exactly right. And it's being played out over the air waves of America and I hope the Democrats now turn to the fairness doctrine. It's time now for the Democrats　--

GLENN: Yes. I know.

ED SCHULTZ: -- to consider the fairness doctrine, when you've got Rush Limbaugh out there saying we've got to defeat these bastards.

GLENN: Yes.

ED SCHULTZ: He is now openly admitting this he is going to work against and campaign against the Republican -- against the Democratic party.

PAT: He's been clear on that.

GLENN: He's always been --

PAT: Like this is a new deal for Rush?

GLENN: I mean -- stop, stop, stop, stop. Okay. So, there he is. This is yesterday. Here he is just before the election.

STU: This is　-- who talks to　-- he's talking to someone who is saying that the censor　-- the fairness doctrine is coming back over at News Busters and he said, Who talks to Nancy Pelosi more? You or me? Have you talked to Nancy Pelosi ever, because if he had, once he had ever　-- if he had had once ever had he done so more than　-- oh, geez. This is just　-- this is why I can't speak in coherent sentences. But he responded, quote, Well, I just spoke to Nancy Pelosi and no one wants to see the fairness doctrine brought back.

GLENN: No one.

PAT: No one.

GLENN: Except me.

PAT: No one else.

GLENN: Now that we have power　-- I mean, listen to this. He's calling for the fairness doctrine after they've won, not after they've lost, after they've won. They still got it done, with all of the debate, and, yet, they want to shut down the debate. They want to make it even easier than it was. They've won! And they want to shut you up. Imagine what they would have done if they would have lost. Killed us all?

PAT: Does that show you how comfortable they are? It shows how comfortable they are with this bill.

GLENN: Oh, yeah.

PAT: They're really uncomfortable. They know something is wrong. They know this won't hold up.

GLENN: What is the difference between this and global warming?

PAT: There is none.

GLENN: There is none. There is no difference between this and global warming. These people cannot handle a debate. Did you notice　-- you know, Stu and I were talking. There was a story out that said that I was backtracking on one of the stories　-- I don't remember what it was　-- I was backtracking. Oh, on the Jim Wallace thing.

STU: Social justice, backtracking.

GLENN: And Stu watched the monolog and he said, Where is the backtracking there? I mean, I went further. I went further. I wasn't backtracking. And I said to him, I said, you know, Stu, this week I have finished up the radio or television shows and there have been moments where I've finished them up and I have said,　-- I've looked at the staff and I've said, can anybody make an argument against that? I mean, it may be wrong as far as that's not necessarily what's coming, but can anyone say that's just crazy, because that's all people do. Anybody in the media, he's crazy, he's dangerous, he's an entertainer, he's in it for ulterior motives, whatever it is, but they never address the consent, ever, unless it's out of context.

STU: Right. And I think that's one of the issues is that these people are writing stories in a 20 minute window that they have before they have to pump out another one about something completely unrelated and it's a problem, especially frustrating for us because we sit here for three years hours every day going over these things. We go so in-depth, we talk about, you know, endlessly, theory, how long have we talked about Woodrow Wilson? Can we go any more in-depth about things like that?

GLENN: Yes, we can.

STU: Oh, no. Please don't.

GLENN: We could. We could do it tomorrow. I could add an extra hour to the show tomorrow.

STU: I don't think we should do that, but the point is it's like these people are trying to read one sentence they read on a blog or a report from somewhere else, trying to form an opinion.

GLENN: Here's the amazing thing. If you really wanted -- somebody's challenging me to a debate, notice they're all doing this, Well, I challenge Glenn Beck to a debate. I don't think so. If you wanted to have a real discussion, I would be in, but nobody wants to do that. All they're doing is angling to either, A, sell their books, hype their TV show, or just get him! When are we going to have an actual conversation in America?

(Out at 10:30 a.m.)

Glenn: I'm just looking up at the headlines. The GOP should just go for it with repeal and reform campaign. That's from President Obama. Then why is he trying to shut it down? Why are all the operatives shouting it down? Let it go. Let it go. The President said they should go for it. Everybody in watch watch said, That's the stupidest thing I've ever seen. That's going to destroy the republican party! Wouldn't they want that? Are they suddenly worried about a level playing field and they want to advise the Republicans, don't do any more damage, we need a two-party system. We need you-guys to win once in awhile? Is that what that strategy is all of a sudden? I love this. Yeah. I would like to take my advice from the Democrats. Uh-huh, uh-huh. That's why I would like to also take my advice on what he should do on this program from Ed Schultz, because he's so darn successful and he's got my best interest at heart.

We have Noel Sheppard on? Noel Sheppard from NewsBusters. And, Noel, you are a guy who, God bless you, I don't know how you've done it. You've actually listened and talked to Ed.

SHEPPARD: No, no, no. I've actually never talked to Ed.

GLENN: Oh, good for you.

SHEPPARD: Yeah. No. I'm not sure that Ed and I　would get along very well, although, you know, if he invited me on, Glenn, I would certainly speak to him but somehow I don't imagine it would be a friendly discussion.

GLENN: I just wanted to touch base with you because I asked Stu, I said, Has Ed Schultz ever advocated, you know, We've got to get these guys? We've got to throw these guys out of office? Has he ever done that before?

SHEPPARD: Oh, definitely. I mean, as we go back　-- what I did is I've compiled a list of some of his greatest hits and most of them are quite recent.

GLENN: Okay. What are they?

SHEPPARD: He made a comment　-- and let me see if I can find it. He made a comment　--

GLENN: You're breaking news here because this is the first time that anyone but Ed Schultz and you have heard anything that Ed Schultz has said.

SHEPPARD: That's true. We're about to radically increase his ratings. So　--

GLENN: Oh, yeah, yeah.

SHEPPARD: -- maybe you ought to reconsider this whole segment, Glenn.

GLENN: Oh. Yeah. It's amazing.

SHEPPARD: As I recall back in January, January 14th　-- 15th or 16th, he made a comment on his radio show and this is just before the election in　-- the special election in Massachusetts, he made a comment on his radio show that if he lived in Massachusetts, I would vote 10 times　--

GLENN: Oh, yeah.

SHEPPARD: -- to keep these bastards out. You've got to love him. I mean, he's honest. Right?

GLENN: Right. Oh, yeah. No. I mean, he is honest in his cheating, yes.

SHEPPARD: He's honest in his cheating.

GLENN: Right.

SHEPPARD: And I think on the same day　-- I think on the same day he made a comment that if Brown wins, it will be the end of change as we know it. Now, for many of us, we hoped that that was going to be the case but based on what happened in Sunday and what's happened the rest of this week, apparently Brown's victory didn't end change as we know it, did it, Glenn?

GLENN: Ed, I would like to　-- if I may quote the President, Some people are talking about this whole bill as Armageddon.

SHEPPARD: Yeah.

GLENN: I mean, that's what he said about Scott Brown. It's going to be the end of change.

SHEPPARD: The other beautiful thing is so the bill has been in effect for a couple of days, three days, whatever it is and Obama is out there saying, See, they said the world was going to an end if this bill was signed. Of course, nothing's been enacted yet. So, it's kind of early for the world to end.

GLENN: Yeah. No. It will probably be　-- if we can make it to 2014 --

SHEPPARD: Yeah.

GLENN: -- it will probably be 2014

SHEPPARD: Yeah. And then hopefully Obama is out of office at that point. So, it　--

GLENN: It could be blamed on the Republicans. No, it will be blamed on the Republicans.

SHEPPARD: Oh, no doubt. There's no doubt, but here's another one I think you'll like. I found this. This goes back to September when Ed Schultz said on his MSNBC show　-- again, we're probably now talking　-- more people are learning about what he said at this moment than actually witnessed it while it occurred.

Glenn: Oh, no, no, no, no, no. No, wait, wait. Let's get this right, because I believe in accuracy and fairness. More people are hearing about it now than have watched MSNBC the entire lineup for the last month.

SHEPPARD: (Laughter.)

GLENN: All right. Go ahead. (Laughter.)

SHEPPARD: Should we rethink? We're doing this man a favor.

GLENN: No, no. I mean, please. There's not anybody who's listening to this show that thinks this guy is anything but a pin head. All right. So　--

SHEPPARD: Last September, around the 24th and Ed makes the comment on his MSNBC program, the Republicans lie, they want to see you dead, they would rather make money off your dead corpse, they kind of like it when that woman had cancer and they don't have anything for her. Oh, you've got to love him. Right? And they're talking about the angry rhetoric Tea Parties, right, and the angry rhetoric on Capitol Hill this weekend.

GLENN: And that's on MSNBC.

SHEPPARD: And Ed Schultz is claiming the Republicans want people to die.

GLENN: It's unbelievable. I don't know why he's not successful. I just can't imagine why he's not successful. Ed, we're just　-- Ed, I just want you to know, we're leveling the playing field for you. That's all we're doing. We're　-- I'm giving permission, anybody that could listen to Ed, you go right ahead. If this sounds attractive to you, you go ahead and go over there

SHEPPARD: Well, the other thing, more recently he made a comment　-- and this was actually in response to a News Busters piece that I wrote, Glenn. He made a comment that we ought to rip Dick Cheney's heart out. Now, this is the tolerant left. Right? We ought to rip Dick Cheney's heart out. That was only about three weeks ago. That was February 24th or 25th he made that comment, maybe 23rd.

GLENN: What was happening in the world where Ed all of a sudden　--

PAT: I think it was　-- it was -- wasn't it right around the time Dick Cheney had a heart attack?

SHEPPARD: Yeah.

PAT: And I think that's when he said it.

GLENN: So, you instead of sending flowers, you rip his heart out? These guys are good. No. They're good people.

SHEPPARD: Well, maybe he was being kind. He was saying, Dick, that heart obviously doesn't work. So, maybe you ought to rip it out and put in a new one?

GLENN: Yeah. There you go. There you go. We're giving him the benefit of the　--

SHEPPARD: It's the health care reform thing. If this Obamacare goes through, Dick Cheney won't have all of these heart attacks because we'll rip his heart out. We'll give him a new one!

GLENN: Right. And do you know what? Let me tell you something. Those are the kind of doctors we're going to do that are just, I'll fix it. I'll rip it heart out and then I'll jam another one in.

SHEPPARD: But I think what's going to happen then is everybody is going to be given a liberal heart. Just imagine what it will be then.

GLENN: I don't believe liberals have hearts. They have hearts. They don't no brains. That's how it is.

SHEPPARD: They have hearts. They have no brains. So, there won't be any brain transplants coming from liberals. Right?

GLENN: Well, thank you very much, sir, and, Noel, keep up the good work.

SHEPPARD: My pleasure. Any time you need me, sir.

 

Trump is INDICTED: Here are the TOP 5 questions about Trump's indictment ANSWERED

Brandon Bell / Staff, J2R | Getty Images

BREAKING NEWS: Trump has been INDICTED.

Today marks the first time in U.S. history that a President has been criminally indicted—but what does that actually mean? Unless you have a legal or political background, it is difficult to follow what will actually happen surrounding Trump's indictment.

Glenn will provide more clarity in coming days as this story continues to unfold. In the meantime, Americans are wondering what Trump's indictment means and what comes next.

Here are five things you NEED to know about Trump's indictment.

1. What does "indictment" actually mean?

To "indict" someone is the formal term used when a person is notified that they have been officially charged with a crime. In this case, the Manhattan grand jury found that the Manhattan District Attorney, Alvin Bragg, brought forward enough evidence to criminally charge Trump with a crime.

2. What crime is Trump being charged with?

Though the story is still developing, at the time of this article's publication, Trump was apparently being charged with mislabeling campaign finance funds. A week before the 2016 Presidential election, adult film star Stormy Daniels claimed she allegedly slept with Trump years prior and threatened to go public with the story. Trump's then-advisor Michael Cohen paid Stormy Daniels $130,000 and labeled the fee as "legal fees" in their campaign finances. Trump repaid Cohen once he was elected to office.

Mislabeling legal fees is a misdemeanor—not a felony—yet Trump is being federally charged. Hillary Clinton was guilty of the same misdemeanor, mislabeling funding for the Steele Dossier as "legal fees" in her campaign finances. Why did she get away with paying $130,000 to the Federal Election Commission, while Trump is facing federal criminal charges?

Mislabeling campaign finances can't be considered a felony unless there is evidence it was used to shield a federal crime. So what was Trump covering up? Even NBC admitted that Bragg's case to prove this point was flimsy to begin with. It has not been revealed what evidence was presented to the grand jury to determine that Trump is guilty of a federal crime.

3. What is a "grand jury" and how are they able to indict Trump?

A "grand jury" is a type of federal jury that evaluates criminal cases. A U.S. prosecutor has to submit evidence before a grand jury, who will determine whether there is “probable cause” to believe an individual has committed a crime and should be put on trial. In this case, the Manhattan grand jury ruled that the evidence submitted by Manhattan DA Bragg was sufficient enough to believe that Trump had committed a federal crime.

Grand jury proceedings are closed to the public, thus, we don't have access to the evidence Bragg submitted before the jury.

4. Will Trump be arrested?

The simple answer is: yes.

Trump's arrest won't look like your typical crime shows with police officers busting through Trump's door and handcuffing him. The district attorney’s office will ask Trump’s attorney when he plans to come to New York to be arraigned, which means to appear before a court to face criminal charges. Once Trump arrives in Manhattan, he will likely surrender himself at the courthouse where he will be formally "arrested," taken to get fingerprinted, get a mugshot taken, and even a DNA test. He will then await his trial to defend himself against the charges.

5. Will Trump appear in court?

Yes. Once Trump is arraigned, he will await his court date to defend himself against his charges. Trump will likely pay bail to avoid being confined to the courthouse or a jail cell.

Buckle up, America! Be sure to tune into the Glenn Beck Program to stay up-to-date on all the developments surrounding Trump's indictment. And if you haven't already, be sure to check out last week's episode of Glenn TV where Glenn dove deep into the "big distraction"—the REAL reason they're going after Trump.

Message to America after the Nashville massacre: We are worshiping a FALSE GOD

BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / Contributor , DEA / A. VERGANI / Contributor , Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images.

We had yet another tragic school shooting. There is only one way to begin to address this tragedy, a tragedy that has repeated itself all too often. We must begin by mourning with the families of the victims. Our hearts break for the victims, their families, and the entire community affected by this senseless act of violence.

I'm a parent, and I mourn with you as one.

I'm also a concerned citizen deeply concerned with the profound brokenness that pervades our current culture. All of us fear for the safety of our children and our loved ones. We share the same goal of creating a safe and secure environment for everyone, especially for our children, in our schools, in places of learning and growth.

It is natural for all of us to feel anger and fear during these times, and it may seem unnatural to rise above it. But we must. It's essential to remember that we have to come together as a society, together, and address the root causes of violence. Let me state it plainly: the root cause is not the gun, but rather, the misuse of them by individuals who are mentally ill or have criminal intent. I, for one, want to address the problem of gun violence. I am worried about this with my own children. Every American, regardless of who you voted for, feels the same.

But enough is enough.

When will we address mental health? Do you know the damage we have done to our children, just because of COVID? We have destroyed the mental health of our children. Our country's suicide rate is proof enough that something has gone deeply awry within the soul of our nation—the souls of our children. What is causing all of this? It is the loss of the old guards of our civilization.

Something has gone deeply awry within the soul of our nation.

There are several groups that we need to address. First, to the parents and families of the Nashville victims, I'm sorry. We love you. Our society is sick—it is sick and unrecognizable to most of us. Your loved ones have paid the ultimate price for that illness. I'm sorry because I'm part of the society that has an unwillingness to see the truth, apparently.

Second, to the mother of the 27-year-old shooter, we mourn with you as well. I've read your old posts. You've been fighting against guns in school. While we disagree, we both want this violence to end. I've also read your posts about your children, and how proud you are. There were so many moments of beauty. You feel the same way every mom and dad feels about their child, and you were right to feel that way.

Today, I can only imagine how confused you must be. You should know, we love you too. You lost a child as well. You lost a child to the same society that has an unwillingness to see the truth. You should also know, you are part of our community, and we mourn with you as well.

You lost a child to the same society that has an unwillingness to see the truth.

Now, lastly, to the political class and the media elites. You have been dividing us for years. At first, I think I was a part of that. I've tried really hard not to be. However, you're not sincere in anything you do. At first, maybe you thought you were right in your motivations, but then every time society proved you wrong and you just dug your heels in.

Why do you continue to divide us? Is it just to win over your opponent? Is it just to crush the other side? Is it because you believe that everyone who doesn't vote your way is evil? Or is it that you just no longer care? I'm one American among many who no longer believe in you.

I can understand how easy it is to think people who vote differently than me are the problem. I really can, and those people aren't the problem. The problem begins with people, like you, who only care about money or power, or are so arrogant that they think they know better than the rest of us. You make yourselves and your system into a false god. The arrogance.

You make yourselves and your system into a false god.

You go after the disaffected, the weak, and the hopeless, and you prey on these people, promising to be their savior, hoping they will help you gain power over those who you call your enemies. You have lied. You have lied through half-truths. You have lied through omission. You have lied through fabrications. You have distorted the truth to the degree that it's no longer recognizable.

You call men women, and women men. In your world, our children are legally children until 25 for insurance purposes. Yet you also consider our children "adult" enough to alter their own bodies at eight years old. You have called evil good, and good evil. We do not have a gun problem in America. Per capita, there were more gun owners 50 years ago than there are right now, yet they didn't have these problems. Is it the gun, or is it the people?

What we have in America is a TRUTH problem. We have turned ourselves inside out. We have turned ourselves against the basic principles that gave us life and freedom, and the promise of a fuller life. Our women have no more children, and our men have lost all meaning, reason, and faith.

What we have in America is a TRUTH problem.

Just yesterday, the Wall Street Journal released a poll that showed what principles the American people value most. Children, God, family—the values that used to define us as Americans—were LAST on the list. What was on the top? Money was in the top three. Money? Since when has money become a principle?

Perhaps it is because money is the god that so many worship—money over principles every time a corrupt bank is bailed out, money over principles for those who never want to pay their school tuition, every time we make someone who didn't go to school pay for someone else's tuition.

What kind of god do we worship, that makes children so allegedly flawed that we lay them on our metal alters to the gods in the surgical gowns, who can mutilate and sterilize them to make them "just the way they were intended?" That's an ancient god I don't recognize.

We all know the words that were written in the summer of 1776: "We hold these truths." But other words were written later that year when things weren't so sunny. It was December 21st: "These are the times that try men's souls." These words turned our nation around. These truly are the times that try men's souls, and the modern-day patriots—the lovers of truth and justice—must stand firm in the face of an ever-growing storm of disinformation and division. The weak-hearted are not going to be able to weather the storm, but those with the courage to fight for what is true will emerge victorious.

Lovers of truth and justice must stand firm in the face of an ever-growing storm of disinformation and division.

We live in a time when our faith in institutions, our faith in everything we know, is at an all-time low. Our republic is under siege, and the only way out is to remember our founding principles. We are drowning in a sea of lies. Cling to the life raft! Cling to the enduring belief in life and liberty, truth and justice. We'll only be able to find our way out if we can rekindle the flame of unity and embrace the American spirit that carried us through so many crises before. We have been here before.

But this time, in our current American crisis, we have to constantly remind ourselves that our fight isn't against an external enemy that we conquer. Our enemy is causing the internal divisions that are threatening to tear us apart, divisions that are created by monsters of men. These monsters are not just tearing us apart individual to individual, but tearing us and our children out from the inside out.

Cling to the enduring belief in life and liberty, truth and justice.

America, it is high time to reaffirm our commitment to the values that define us as a people. It is our collective responsibility, as free people, to stand up for those principles of truth. The seeds of division have been sewn by those who seek to manipulate and exploit us for their own gain. They shatter our trust in one another to instill fear and hatred where there should be understanding and compassion.

Truth is now clouded by conspiracy. The lines between fact and fiction have been blurred. Truth is a light. Everything we face is not insurmountable, but now is the time to return to truth and decency and justice for all.

Our kids are the ones who are going to pay the highest of prices for what we do now.

What's on Glenn's desk? THIS graphic novel's dystopia has TERRIFYING similarities to our world.

Matt Battaglia

Imagine a global health crisis. Everyone is ordered to "stay-at-home" and only to venture out for "essential" purposes. Travel is regulated by government surveillance, with only permitted workers allowed to go into the city. Inflation is at historic levels, and basic necessities, such as food and gasoline, become invaluable commodities.

Sound familiar?

As the COVID pandemic begins to recede into our cultural memory, it is harrowing to remember the sheer breadth of power we surrendered to our government in order to "keep us safe." We would be foolish to think that the pandemic wasn't a repetition of an age-old tale in the west, and we would be even more naive to believe that we aren't at risk of repeating it in the future: the government's manipulation of a crisis to secure its complete control over its people.

We would be foolish to think that the pandemic wasn't a repetition of an age-old tale

Filmmaker Matt Battaglia published a first in what is likely to become an emerging genre of post-pandemic apocalyptic literature, bringing to life the harrowing consequences of what could happen if we continue to surrender our liberty to the government for the sake of "safety and security."

Battaglia's graphic novel, House on Fire, brings this world to life in an even more vivid dimension through pictures, telling the story of a single day of a man living in this apocalyptic world that doesn't seem too distant from our own.

The setting

Imagine there is another global pandemic of a respiratory virus that is similar to COVID. The government implements COVID-like lockdowns and restrictions from their 2020 blueprint, but this time, the regulations are here to stay. After all, this pandemic isn't the only threat allegedly facing the American people. The future of our planet is at stake. On top of the pandemic regulations, our government restricts the types of food available for consumption, implements individual carbon quotas, mandates electric vehicles, eliminates gas-powered heating, cars, stoves, etc.

Of course, the pandemic and climate change policies require major government funding, so the President uses his emergency powers and executive orders to push through a multi-trillion-dollar proposal that secures the funding necessary to finance the "clean and safe transition." Yes, inflation will be an issue, but that is a small price to pay to secure our health and the future of our planet. Don't forget to include foreign aid for our warring allies in the multi-trillion-dollar packages as well.

Inflation is a small price to pay to secure the future of our planet.

Now fast forward 20 years of living under these all-too-familiar draconian policies. This is Battaglia's apocalyptic world where we meet our nameless main character, causing the reader to question whether our world could devolve into Battaglia's in such a short amount of time.

The plot

Battaglia's story begins with our character kissing his wife goodbye and leaving their country home on a one-day mission to the city in search of a cure for his wife's most recent bout of the illness that is, presumably, a result of the pandemic.

All of the themes that contribute to the apocalyptic nature of Battaglia's world are familiar to us, disturbingly so. Our character drives through country roads, passing by gas signs that list $20 per gallon prices. His radio reports on another invasion of Poland, while country fields transform into steeple-like towers of run-down factories, like old monuments to former industries of a time long past.

Our character reaches the city limit, a border-like security checkpoint where he is required to scan his identity card to enter the city, the likes of which we see in China today. Masks required. He then drives through empty streets of a once bustling city, save for several suspect people who seem to blend into the crevices of alleyways and corners, shrouded by their masks.

Finally, our character meets with his "contact," who gives him some type of canister, supposedly a remedy for his wife's ailment. He barters with several cuts of meat, a rarity more valuable than inflated cash in this "Green New World." From this point onward, things take a turn for our character—for the worst.

Glenn's warning

Many of these scenes bring to life themes that Glenn has been warning about for years, from the government's use of a pandemic to seize control over its people, the depleted dollar and record-high inflation resulting from government spending and foreign conflicts, the Great Reset's goals to eliminate meat, gas-powered products, and other "high emissions products." All of these will be done in the name of seemingly righteous goals: "health," "safety," "security," and the "future of our planet" come to mind. However, we won't realize our freedoms will be a faint memory of the past until it is too late.

All of these measures will be done in the name of seemingly "righteous" goals.

House on Fire's poignant ending leaves the reader with a terrifying yet vitally important question: are the issues plaguing our society latent within society itself, or do they stem from the troubles within our own souls? Does society mold the human soul, or is society, as Plato puts it, the human soul "writ large?"

Battaglia's short yet powerful graphic novel brings to life many of the themes that Glenn has been warning his listeners. It is sitting on his desk, and we hope it will sit on yours too. It gives the reader a glimpse into our society after years of decay and oppression, calling on the reader to halt its progression before it's too late.

Click HERE to get your own copy!

Elon Musk comments on Glenn's podcast with David Sacks, takes jab at U.S. foreign policy

Pool / Pool | Getty Images

Elon Musk chimed into Glenn's conversation about foreign policy with PayPal's founding COO David Sacks on the most recent installment of the Glenn Beck Podcast.

Musk tweeted, "US foreign policy is bronze tier on a good day!" He hit the nail on the head, as Glenn and Sacks discussed the deterioration of U.S. foreign policy and the rising probability of war with Russia and China.

Glenn asked Sacks, "How likely do you think it is that we'd be headed towards war?" Sacks responded that he has been warning about the imminent threat of war since the Ukraine situation started and lamented that we have entered into a "proxy war of choice" with Russia.

"We engaged in a series of actions going back to 2008 that the Russians have viewed as highly provocative," Sacks said, decrying the continued expansion of NATO into Ukraine. Russia has continually warned the U.S. against expanding NATO into Ukraine, yet the State Department "crusaders" have persisted in their NATO-driven objective, which is "unacceptable to the Russians," Sacks said, "in the same way the Soviet Union trying to put nukes in Cuba was unacceptable to us in 1962."

If NATO expansion isn't enough to provoke a response from the Russian bear, our ongoing and escalating aid to Ukraine certainly is. As Sacks explained, "We're not just providing [Ukraine] with money and weapons. We are providing them with intelligence, we have commandos on the ground" and we are even directing Ukrainian soldiers on how to use our weapons on how to hit specific Russian targets. As Sacks said, "We are providing the kill chain" for Ukraine.

To put this in perspective, that would be equivalent to Russian soldiers instructing Taliban members on how to use Russian weapons to hit specific U.S. camps in Afghanistan. In that situation, wouldn't we accuse Russia of engaging in an act of war? The term "proxy" is increasingly diminishing in its relevance towards the U.S.'s involvement in the Ukrainian conflict. We aren't engaging in a "proxy war" anymore. As Sacks said, "We are effectively a co-belligerent in this conflict."

It is no wonder that we are driving Russia into China's arms while both Putin and Xi continue to forge ties with sworn enemies of the U.S., including Iran and North Korea. If we continue to "poke the bear," it is only a matter of time before Russia finds its confidence with its newly-forged allies to retaliate against its aggressor.

Musk rightly said, "US foreign policy is bronze tier on a good day." But U.S. foreign policy has not even had a "good day" in some time. We are not only jeopardizing our own international reputation with ongoing aid to Ukraine; we are jeopardizing the whole world order by marching NATO increasingly toward war. Elites in the Biden administration and the military industrial complex may benefit from aggravating Russia towards war, but it certainly doesn't benefit anyone else, in the U.S. and abroad.

There are few tools in the conservative's kit to fight back against the elites' dangerous agenda. However, Musk mentioned one of these vital tools in a comment he tweeted on Glenn's interview with San Fransicko author and Twitter Files contributor Michael Schellenberger back in January: "Citizen journalism is vital to the future of civilization."

As Glenn continues to give people a platform to speak out against the elites, it is encouraging to see Musk continue to help make Twitter a platform where people can voice their challenges to the machine's agenda.