Glenn Beck: Your Rights Are Slipping Away

I've got a question for you: How much do you really value your freedom of speech?

Oh, Glenn! Will you stop with your fear mongering? Free speech will never go away. America practically invented free speech!

If you don't think it can happen here, well, you just don't know history.

Woodrow Wilson imprisoned thousands of Americans for speaking out against the United States involvement in World War I. He also dictated the news coverage. And, when his policies weren't popular, he dispatched goon squads — kind of the SEIU of their day.

So don't tell me it can't happen; it already has.

Here's the next question: How far do you let things go before you — or better yet, your neighbor who doesn't agree with you — gets up off the couch and says, "I don't agree with him, but he has a right to say it!"

Florida urologist Jack Cassell reached his tipping point when Obamacare passed. He posted a sign on the door at his office that read: "If you voted for Obama, seek urologic care elsewhere. Changes to your health care begin right now. Not in four years."

For expressing — as permitted under the First Amendment — his frustration with a bill that he truly believes will destroy the health care system and in turn harm the quality of care his patients receive, Dr. Cassell has got a congressman slapping complaints against him with the Department of Health.

Alan Grayson is filing the complaint — he's the moron who said that all Republicans want sick people to die:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REP. ALAN GRAYSON, D-FL.: The Republican health care plan is this: die quickly! That's right, the Republicans want you to die quickly if you get sick.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Grayson has also suggested that Cassell is — you guessed it — a racist for turning away patients who supported Obama. Listen to this stellar logic:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

GRAYSON: What he is doing is no different from saying I will not treat a black person, I will not treat a Catholic.

Where he lives in Mount Dora, which is in my district, many, many of the Democrats who live in Mount Dora happen to be African-Americans. So by saying that he will not treat somebody who supported Obama, he's saying that he's not going to treat a large number of African-Americans in this community.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

The sign couldn't possibly have anything to do — nothing whatsoever — with the government taking the first step towards a single-payer system; a system that will leave Canadians everywhere weeping because they'll no longer be able to flee to America for health care? No, this doctor must be a racist. I bet he even wears a white coat. Elementary, my dear Grayson.

Of course, no one is bothering to look at the actual facts in the case. Cassell isn't actually turning anybody away. He's not screening by political views. Here's what he said: "I'm not turning anybody away, that would be unethical. But if they read the sign and turn the other way, so be it."

All he's doing is making a political statement. The one person the newspapers found who is upset about it says she "felt like" she wouldn't be treated. Not she "wasn't treated" or was "denied treatment." She just "felt" that way.

I'm not a lawyer, but I have watched a lot of "Perry Mason" and I don't think this argument would hold up in court. Maybe I missed the episode where Paul gave a wink so Perry could make the guy say, "I didn't do it, but I felt like I was going to." You either did or you didn't.

This doctor is standing up against something he feels will destroy his business; standing up for what he thinks is right; standing up for what he thinks is best for his patients. And Congress finds this appalling and wants this guy's license stripped away.

Isn't this the quintessential reason freedom of speech exists: To allow people to speak up against government without fear of things like losing their business?

Isn't this why the Founders were fleeing England? Yes and no. It became about political speech, but originally it was about religious speech. Being able to disagree, religiously, with what the king thought. I have news for you: You're about to lose both political and religious free speech. Do you really think the Founders made the First Amendment so porn stars could express themselves?

I wonder how the left would enjoy this new anti-free speech government under different control? Say Ronald Reagan comes back to life and becomes president in 2012. The speaker of the house is New Gingrich. Karl Rove is chief of staff. Jesus is Senate majority leader. Dick Cheney is special adviser on evil-related activities. Donald Rumsfeld is press secretary.

Now how do you like the system you've created? Where the right to disagree with the president or his policies is gone and speaking out will result in losing your business or your license or at the very least being publicly attacked? How do you like it now, when the evil Karl Rove is in power? Suddenly it doesn't sound so utopian, does it? That's why freedom of speech — whether you agree or disagree with the president — is of paramount importance.

Who is this administration building into the enemies that have to be silenced? Who in the media is making a difference today? Who is actually challenging the president and asking him something other than who he picked to win in his NCAA bracket? Let's see — there's a few:

• Fox News

Brett Baier is practically the only journalist to actually challenge the president. Is he really the only reporter in America who could come up with tough questions for the president? Seems like it. Is this the only network that has noticed the government's sudden proclivity for taking over entire industries — like the student loan industry — so they can "cut out the middleman" who was taking in evil profits? Seems like it.

But this administration responds to Fox News by saying we are not really a news organization and opinion shows like mine are in trouble with the president by name — listen to what he says here:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: I think that when you listen to Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck —

HARRY SMITH, CBS NEWS: It's beyond that.

OBAMA: It's pretty apparent and it's troublesome.

But, you know, keep in mind that there have been periods in American history where this kind of vitriol comes out.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Vitriol? Since when is saying "you're a socialist; look at your policies" hateful? That sounds like political speech. I know, look at this "hate speech" from Newsweek. That's not derogatory; it's an idea.

Chris Matthews didn't go after the word "socialist." His problem is that the word "regime" is being used to describe Obama and that he "never heard" that kind of language when Bush was president.

Really? The New York Times referred to the "Bush regime" 16 times; The Washington Post referred to the "Bush regime" 24 times; MSNBC did it 8 times and Chris Matthews himself, did it once.

• Talk radio

Talk radio is giving a voice to many Americans who feel like government isn't listening to them. Several senators have talked about bringing back the Fairness Doctrine. And then the president comes out and says this last week about being called a socialist:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

OBAMA: That's not the vast majority of Americans. The truth is some of these comments when you actually ask, well this is based on what? This notion that Obama's a socialist, nobody can really give you a good answer.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

I can, Mr. President. In fact, I want to present you with a really good answer, but it's going to be a full hour and we have to pick and choose.

• The Tea Parties

They've been mocked and attacked from the beginning; called "tea baggers" and racists; they've been called violent and extreme — despite any actual evidence.

The latest attack was when Nancy Pelosi and then members of the Black Caucus unnecessarily strolled directly through the "Kill the Bill" rally on March 20: They claimed the N-word was shouted 15 times and congressmen were spat on. Despite cameras rolling all over the place — both media and individual — there is zero proof that even one racial word was said and there is also no proof or evidence of any spitting. But it sure makes one great story, doesn't it? Andrew Breitbart has offered to donate $100,000 to the United Negro College Fund if anyone with actual evidence comes forward. So far there have been no takers.

• The Drudge Report

Last month, in the heat of the health care battle, the administration tried to ban staffers from viewing DrudgeReport.com because of unspecified "virus activity" associated with the site. I go to Drudge every day — never had a computer problem. The "warning" turned out to have "no factual basis."

And now it's the FCC with net neutrality. Coming up next I'm going to show you how the government is going after free speech on the Internet. The radical left lobbying group Free Press has the ear of the president and you'll be quite amazed with their grassroots campaign to control the Internet. And you'll never guess who they are using as their poster boy of who should be silenced.

By the way, I've noticed an interesting trend this week on all of these "grassroots" boycotts. Let's see: First there was the one from Obama's former green jobs czar Van Jones and his front group. Then there was Obama's spiritual adviser Jim Wallis. Oh and SEIU, Andy Stern's union and Obama's best union buddy — the most frequent visitor to the White House.

So three men that advise or have advised the president want you to boycott me. Sounds pretty "grassroots," doesn't it?

Gang, your neighbors need to understand that the free ride our grandparents left us is over. Our rights are slipping away. They are trying to squelch free speech through mockery, intimidation, intimidation of advertisers, the Internet — anyway they can.

I go back to the question: When do your neighbors decide enough is enough? I guess when they realize that the only kind of speech that needs protection is the kind of speech that people don't like — especially people who have power. We just have to figure out a way to appeal to their better and bigger American nature, rather than their smaller, Republican or Democrat nature.

— WatchGlenn Beckweekdays at 5p & 2a ET on Fox News Channel

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, a transgender activist called for a "Supreme Court Assassination Challenge" on Twitter, according to screenshots captured of the now-deleted tweet.

Activist Eli Erlick, a founding member of Trans Student Educational Resources (TSER) and creator of the controversial "gender identity" teaching tool for children called the "Gender Unicorn," tweeted and later deleted the disturbing remark on Friday, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) also caught a screenshot of the tweet before it was deleted.

"The unhinged radical left is calling for the assassination of our Supreme Court Justices. That's not the way to disagree with a decision in America. It is unacceptable, and Biden’s DOJ must immediately act," Blackburn responded on Twitter.

Erlich then tried to play off her call to assassinate Supreme Court justices as a hilarious joke only Gen Z and Millennials would understand, apparently not understanding the seriousness of the attempted assassination of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh just three weeks ago.

Erlick isn't the only Left-winger to make incendiary calls since the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision. Here are just a few examples:

  • Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) called on people to “defy" the Supreme Court.
  • Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) called for people to get “into the streets” alongside radical communist leader who wants to 'overthrow' the American system.
  • Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot (D) yelled "F*** Clarence Thomas" on a public stage for all to see and hear.
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) suggested that Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh lied to Congress.
  • And of course, "TheView" host Whoopi Goldberg issued a disgusting racist threat toward Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Filling in for Glenn Beck on the radio program, BlazeTV hosts Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere took a look at these and other stunning examples of leftist lunacy over the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Watch the video clip below. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Many members of the far-left already are calling for a ‘Night of Rage’ after the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, and the White House has been discussing plans to defy the ruling too. In fact, one idea floated by Biden Administration officials, according to the New York Times, includes providing abortions on military bases. So, will America experience another summer of riots? Are YOUR taxpayer dollars at risk? And what does this mean for deep-blue states? Josh Hammer, legal expert and opinion editor for Newsweek, joins Glenn to discuss what may come next...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Josh Hammer, he's the opinion editor of Newsweek. He's the host of the Josh Hammer show. He is really quite brilliant. One of the leading minds in the conservative movement, I think. Josh Hammer joins us now.

To tell us, what did you find in this decision?

JOSH: Glenn, great to be back with you, on such a momentous, and really such an emotional day, honestly. So, you know, look, as you said, this dropped recently. Funny enough, I was in the middle of getting a guest lecture from an organization on the advisory board as to when it drops. So I barely had any time to kind of skim through, let alone guess the concerning dissenting opinions. But it looks like this looks very similar, to the draft opinion that was leaked, by the Politico story, a month and a half ago, in early May. And I think those of us who were praying that the five justices from this leaked draft opinion, would have the fortitude to stiffen their spines against this unprecedented assault. Now knows that our prayers were answered, Glenn. That's really my takeaway right now.

This looks a lot like the leaked opinion. Justice Thomas and Justice Kavanaugh have some reconcurring opinions.

But unbelievable. And really just holding aside the constitutional law stuff for a second hear. Just speaking as pro-lifers, on a day like today, I think we really just need to pause. And I tweeted this out earlier. We need to just be grateful for our half century of pro-life activist forbearers. You know, this -- Glenn, this issue could have gone away after 1973. That was a long time ago. 1973. I mean, this issue could have just gone away. We owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to the pro-life moral activist. Political activist. And, of course, yes. Legal activist. Who fought day in and day out, that makes sure this great injustice stayed front and center of our national, political conscience. And in many days, the culmination of a half century of fighting for truth and justice. But in many ways, it's also a new beginning for the pro-life fight as well, interestingly.

STU: How do you mean a new beginning for the fight? I just it's going to turn, I think we're going to see abortion turn even darker in those states that allow it. Is that -- is that what you're meaning by this?

JOSH: Well, look, for a half century now, Roe vs. Wade, and its project any, specifically, the Planned Parenthood versus Casey case of 1992.

They took away from the states obviously. They arrogated authority away from the states, the ability to attempt to nationally codify one view of the morality of abortion.

It happened to be a profoundly immoral view. So these -- the fight now shifts to the states. And the pro-life activists. And all the 50 states. Especially, obviously in red states. Purple states. I mean, admittedly some blue states like New York and California, probably won't be able to touch them there.

But we have to make sure that our side is well positioned in the state Capitols for every red, purplish, probably even light blue state, to make sure we fight for successful, cogent, and morally consistent pro-life legislation. The state of Oklahoma, actually, just north of Texas. Right where you are now, Glenn. They have been leading on this actually. Governor Kevin Stitt signed into law, a fantastic pro-life bill there in Oklahoma. A few weeks ago. Maybe a month ago or so at this point, that basically just bans abortion straightforward from conception. And there are some -- you know, obviously, likable the mother. So forth. But we really need to start thinking about trying to craft legislation now, at the state level. But to your point, I do fear that the blue states will only double down in their radicalism. Unfortunately within that will only lead to an ever greater divide, in our country, that we have today. But obviously, at the end of the day. We're going to save at the end of the day, millions and millions of unborn children. We are going to save human beings who can grow up to cure cancer, who can win Nobel prices.

I mean, this is just a tremendous win for the human species. I don't know how to say it other than that.

GLENN: I will tell you, I saw the stat, that I think it was last year or the year before. 20 percent of all pregnancies ended in abortion. 20 percent.

JOSH: Wow.

GLENN: That is -- that is a shocking number. And we do have our -- our work cut out for us. Because I -- I think that these states are going to double down. But I think, you know -- God doesn't waste anything. You know, there is no waste with God. Even the -- even the worst things that could possibly happen, turn out to be something good. You know what I mean? You're like, holy cow, how did that just happen.

And I think that evil is going to fully come unmasked. I'm telling you, Josh. I don't know how you feel about this. I think this could be the day of America's Kristallnacht. I can see these pro-life centers being burned to the ground today. They're calling for a night of rage around the country. I think evil is going to show itself. And that will scare the American people, hopefully.

JOSH: You know, I've been thinking about this a lot this week, actually. Because I've been bracing for a new kind of George Floyd summer of love, happening this summer. Coming to a city or suburb near you. Unfortunately, myself. Look, I live in Florida. I know, Glenn, you live in Texas. It is in moments like this, where I do think that where you live matters. And who your mayor is. Who your governor is, matters.

Because law and order and rioting and anarchy is not really a federal issue. It is to a limited extent. June 2020, Tom Cotton wrote this op-ed that was pretty controversial at the time.

I happen to agree with it. Where he said, quote, unquote, send in the troops. And there is some federal legislation from the reconstruction era that would justify that.

But most kind of quelling and quashing of anarchy does happen. Constitutionally speaking, at the state and local level. So at a moment like this, where I fear that you're probably not wrong. I take some solace. That Governor DeSantis is my governor. I think Texans should take some solace, that they are represented by -- by a Republican governor. The legislature there as well. So I -- I fear that you are right. I pray obviously, that no one -- it's hard.

I fear that it's something -- that something bad is happening. At the end of the day, of course. It does not mean that justices cannot do what they are supposed to do. So thank God they did that.

GLENN: So, Josh, have you looked into what the White House has been saying? The White House yesterday. In fact, do we have a clip of -- of this?

What the White House said yesterday, about the guns. And then they were turned to the -- the Scott us ruling, for Roe vs. Wade. Do we have that, please?

JOSH: Will the president accept this decision, even if he disagrees with it?

VOICE: I think it's going to come from the Supreme Court. So it's a decision we certainly are going to respond to. I'll leave it at that. Just like any other Supreme Court decision. Just like the one they did today on guns.

GLENN: So the White House won't say that they're going to accept it.

Which I don't think they will. They're talking now about taking doctors and moving them into places like Oklahoma or Texas, where abortions will be outlawed. And putting doctors on our military bases to perform abortions.

I mean, where does this go, when you have a government, that is in defiance of -- of one branch of the government?

JOSH: So there's a lot to unpack here. So we should start from first principles. The idea of judicial supremacy, and this is a peculiar thing, to say on a day like today, where such a pro-life victory has happened in Italy. But if we're going to be consistent here, the idea of judicial supremacy. The idea that the justices, have the sole and exclusive ability to interpret the Constitution for themselves. And no other Constitutional actor, in article one or article two, let alone the state. Has the ability to tentatively interpret it. That is erroneous. In fact, actually it was really Abraham Lincoln actually, who in the Dred Scott case, famously opposed judicial supremacy and flouted the Dred Scott ruling, at least as it pertains to everybody other than Dred Scott himself. I have actually argued, a former legal scholarship, in a law review article actually, that the Laconian view of how each branch of government should interpret the Constitution for itself, is correct.

Having said that. Having said that, there is a thing called prudence. And there is a thing called comedy. And in a moment like today, when it really does look like -- and I agree with you, that we are now bracing for riots through the streets. When the political rhetoric is at DEFCON one. When people are trying to assassinate Supreme Court justices. I think it would be -- at its bare minimum, a profoundly imprudent act. For the Biden administration, to try to undermine this ruling.

Now, what they might do, is they might try to kind of issue some kind of executive orders, or issue some regulations, that might try to kind of undermine it, at the edges here. But at the end of the day, the idea that this returns to the state. There's not really a whole lot they can do about that. Basically, at this point, throughout the country. Kentucky within West Virginia. Kansas. Whatever. If they want to go ahead and ban abortion, what can the Biden administration literally do about that? I mean, short of sending in the National Guard, to protect Planned Parenthood, if the state legislature of Kentucky goes ahead and bans it. There's not a whole lot they can do. And it's very difficult to envision a world, in which the Biden administration literally sends in troops to red states, to protect Planned Parenthood, if that state legislature goes ahead and bans it. So for practically speaking. This is a lot of tough talk and rhetoric. Obviously the campaign here in 2022. There's not really a whole lot that practically speaking, they can do to actually prevent red and purple states from enacting pro-life legislation.

GLENN: I'm glad to -- I'm glad to hear that. I know that they have been working on things. I mean, he has said, you know, there's executive orders, that I can employ. There are things that I can do. He's talked about a national public health emergency. Which I think is just -- is crazy. But I would hope, that the president would come out and say, we strongly disagree with this. And you're right. The court is not the end all. But the court did not end abortion. It just said, the people should decide. I think that's the best kind of court ruling, on any of it. The people should decide what this is. And send it back to the states. Josh, I thank you very much. Appreciate your time. Was there -- there was another ruling, that came out today. Was it important?

JOSH: Oh, no. In comparison to this. A total nothing burger. A 5-4 decision on Medicare reimbursement related. So nothing, honestly.

GLENN: Great. Thank you very much. Appreciate it, Josh. Josh Hammer, opinion editor for Newsweek. And the host of the Josh Hammer show.

GLENN: There are two things trending on twitter right now.

Number one is praise God.

Number two trend is Night of Rage.

Good verses evil.

Build up or tear down.

'Lord, we are SORRY it has taken us this long': BlazeTV hosts react to historic Roe v. Wade decision

Photo by Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

The Supreme Court of the United States officially overturned Roe V. Wade, and the debate over abortion rights has been given back to the states. On this historic day, BlazeTV hosts celebrate the Supreme Court's incredible decision and take a look at some of the insane reactions as the left comes completely undone.

Jason Whitlock: Today will forever stand as a pivotal moment in our nation’s history

The Supreme Court of the United States overturned Roe v. Wade. The decision and the reaction to it have already revealed a lot about our people and politics. Pro-life groups celebrate, pro-choice groups call for “a night of rage,” and Nancy Pelosi just seems completely confused by the United States Constitution.

Glenn Beck reacts LIVE to Roe v. Wade ruling: 'Lord, we are SORRY it has taken us this long'

I never thought that in my lifetime, I would see Roe v. Wade be overturned. But today, that day has come. The Supreme Court has voted 6 to 3 to return decisions about abortion to the states. But this fight isn't over. We are about to see good versus evil side by side. Many states will stand with the unborn. But others will become abortion mills. It's your turn to choose now, America!

Allie Beth Stuckey: 'Praise God, Roe v. Wade is overturned!'

I don't know about you, but I just had the most euphoric feelings. It almost seems too good to be true. I didn't think there was any way that this would actually happen, especially with all the backlash, intimidation, and violence toward the Supreme Court justices. And yet, here we are. Roe v. Wade has been overturned. This is an amazing day!

Dave Rubin: Big disagreement on what happens next now that Roe v. Wade is overturned

Dave Rubin, Libby Emmons, Jeffrey A. Tucker, and David Reaboi debate what will happen in the wake of the Supreme Court’s breaking decision on Roe v. Wade. Now that abortion rights have been pushed back to the states, will there be a summer of massive riots or not? Will the Roe v. Wade ruling make America’s political polarization significantly worse?

Stu Burguiere: Here are the reasons SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade

I never thought this would happen. I never thought I would see this day. I just never ever ever ever never ever believed that Roe v. Wade would actually be overturned. I really didn't. But let's take a look at the reasons this day has finally come ...

The Rick & Bubba Show: 'This is history! Unfortunately we're 60 million lives too late'

We were live on the air when news broke of the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.