Glenn Beck: Coburn - Pelosi rox, Fox does not


American Revival - Phoenix, April 10th


Glenn Beck's American Revival is a daylong event where you can find information, inspiration, and the preparation to help turn this country around...


 - Tickets now available!

GLENN: Tom Coburn, isn't he the great Republican hope? Isn't he one of the great Republican hopes?

PAT: Definitely one of them, yeah.

GLENN: Right?

PAT: He's one of the

GLENN: Isn't Tom Coburn, is he the same as Nancy Pelosi?

PAT: Yeah, he's one of those names they threw out.

GLENN: Right? When I said that about CPAC, you know, and there is, I mean, I'm sorry that I don't have footnotes on everything I say all the time. It does require you to have a little bit of critical thinking and give me the little bit the benefit of the doubt. But when I was at CPAC, I was afterwards hunted by some of the Republicans because I'm beginning to think in some ways literally the because they were saying, oh, you think they're all no, no, no. I think Michele Bachmann is one of them. I think what's his name, Jim DeMint is one of them. Tom Coburn was thrown up in my face, and I don't know. I don't know about Tom Coburn. Maybe. Maybe he's not. Maybe he is. But then he comes out today and he's got an article against Fox News.

PAT: Yeah, he was defending Nancy Pelosi to a group of people and

GLENN: I'm sorry. He was what?

PAT: He was defending Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: I'm sorry. He was what?

PAT: Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: He was what?

PAT: Defending Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: How was he, what

PAT: Well, they were yelling about her because they're hacked off at healthcare.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: And they're mad at Nancy Pelosi because she went against the will of the people and oh, she's a nice person; you don't know. So here's his quote.

GLENN: When he was what?

PAT: Defending Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: All right.

PAT: And attacking Fox News.

STU: Are your headphones working, Glenn, because he said that several times.

GLENN: I'm thinking maybe that we speak a different language. It sounded to me can you translate? It sounded to me that the Republican that I'm supposed to defend because he's so unlike Nancy Pelosi was defending Nancy Pelosi.

STU: That is definitely what he said. I'm just saying that you are not hearing because you keep asking him to repeat it and I think there might be a problem technically with the program.

PAT: Either with the headphones or the ears.

GLENN: No, I just don't

PAT: that the headphones are supplying.

GLENN: No, I think I may be one of the only people on planet Earth whose brain is still functioning. All right, go ahead. What did he say?

PAT: Let me give you the quote. Okay, because he's obviously, I think what he's trying to do initially is separate the person from the policy which is fair.

GLENN: Absolutely.

PAT: You like her as a person, whatever.

GLENN: Whatever.

PAT: But here's what he says.

GLENN: I don't know her. So I don't not like her.

PAT: And by the way, this is credit and this is context nobody else would give us.

GLENN: No, no, never.

PAT: Never. What we have to do is make sure we have a debate in this country so that you can see what's going on and make a determination yourself. He continues, Tom Coburn: So don't catch yourself being biased by Fox News that somebody is no good. The people in Washington are good. They just don't know what they don't know. Now see, unquote.

GLENN: Hang on just a second.

PAT: That's a lie. They know.

GLENN: No, no. No, no.

PAT: He's saying that Nancy Pelosi doesn't know.

GLENN: She does.

PAT: She knows.

GLENN: But if he's going to make a blanket statement about those in Washington that just don't know, let me just say this. I think we understand that there are really colossally stupid people in Washington. Guam may capsize.

STU: (Laughing).

GLENN: Okay?

PAT: Okay, yeah.

GLENN: So there are those people who are just, "Okay, George." Got it? I think there is a number of people on both sides of the aisle, dumb as a box of rocks. No different than the general population. There are dumb people around us. Then beyond that there are those who know exactly what they're doing. Nancy Pelosi is one of them. Don't tell me that she's a genius and she doesn't know. She was the architect of getting this one done!

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Don't tell me that she's that smart and stupid.

PAT: She was the one who with 30,000 people there to oppose this bill and they did it peacefully, by the way. They're gathered outside. She takes a giant stinking gavel and parades her and her fellow

GLENN: Progressives.

PAT: Progressives right through the middle of these people trying to provoke them.

GLENN: That she has said, that she has been one of the leaders saying these people are dangerous

PAT: I'm going to pole vault them.

GLENN: They're dangerous, we'll just climb over their wall, we'll pole vault them. She goes through that. She knows exactly what she's doing.

PAT: Absolutely.

GLENN: Now Tom, let me ask you this: If there are those in Washington that are destroying our economy, destroying our freedoms and they just don't know what they don't know, then you should name the frickin' names so we can get those people out of office. If you are so if you are not dumb as a box of rocks and you're not part of an evil cabal of progressivism but you just don't know, then help us educate those people or get them out. You are so irresponsible that you said you would protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and you're telling me the people who say, "I just don't know if it's in the Constitution, I don't really care about the Constitution. I don't check the Constitution. I didn't read the bill," that's because they don't know? That's criminal incompetence. Criminal incompetence.

STU: And I don't know of anyone who has said anything about how delightful Nancy Pelosi is at brunch. She might be a great lady. The point is not that she's no good but that she's no good for the country.

GLENN: Yeah, I don't really care about

STU: She's hurting the country with her policies.

GLENN: Nobody see, this is what the left wants to do. The left, believe me, someday I think I have probably four books that need to be published and they will be published either upon my death or when I'm just ready to just disappear. One of them is on the media, things I've learned. Another one is on politics and things I've learned. Another one is you want threats? Let me show you the volumes of threats. The left would like to cut people's heads off. This is a favorite one: Rape and molest your children? They will do anything to shut you up. Anything to shut you up. I don't want to shut Nancy Pelosi up. She has a right to say whatever she wants. Live within the Constitution and have an honest debate. That's all I want. That's all I want.

PAT: One of the biggest problems I think we have in this country is that we've allowed the left to reposition what hateful rhetoric is. We are opposed to policies and that's what we talk about every day. Sometimes we do it in a colorful way, but when we're talking about

GLENN: But so do they. So does everyone.

PAT: Of course they do. Of course they do. And when you say that Nancy Pelosi is disregarding the will of the American people, that's not hateful rhetoric. That's fact!

GLENN: When I say that these, that Van Jones is a communist, that's not hateful rhetoric.

PAT: That's fact.

GLENN: Those are his words. When I say Jim Wallis is a Marxist, that's not hateful rhetoric. Those are his words. When I say Andy Stern loves to have the workers of the world unite, was a part of SDS, the Students For Democratic Society, those are not hateful, that's not hateful rhetoric. Those are facts. When I lay out the case on Barack Obama like we did last night on television, that's not hateful. There is not a single judgment of the man. Is he a good man or a bad man. Not once have I judged him as a good man or a bad man. What I'm trying to do is expose who he is. You can expose who I am because I made a decision when I first got back, when I honestly when I damn near lost my soul, came to the end and realized I either have to find a way to hold onto my soul and be happy or I'm going to die. I decided that I would do everything I could do put my life back. Well, I did that in 1999. I did everything I could. Now, I was not a perfect man, nor am I a perfect man today. But I do everything I can to put my life back in order. You want to expose me for who I am? That's okay. We'll have an honest debate. I'll tell you exactly what I think. I'll tell you exactly what I believe. I'll tell you exactly what policies I think should be done, and you can combat that. But that's not what these people want to do. They just want to destroy you. And they do not want their policies, their principles, the things that they believe in exposed. Why does America want transparency? Because anything that is happening behind closed doors we need to know about. We need to know about it. I'll tell you the things that happened behind closed doors with me. I'll tell you those things. I'll tell you that I'm not a perfect person. I've made mistakes in my life. I've already told you all of those things, but I did something about those things, and I changed my life. The things I don't tell you now, I don't tell you for security reasons. It is a bizarre world. It is an upside down, inside out, quantum physics world. But I promise you this: Because of who these people are, they will expose themselves. Now, the question is, we've lived beyond our means far too long. We wanted to take the easy way out far too long, and our country is on the eve of destruction, whether that be from the Republicans or the Democrats that spend us into oblivion, it is the eve of destruction in America. How do we fix it? With the truth. Not with guns. Not with riots. With the truth. You must start telling the truth in your own life to yourself. Stop lying to yourself. Stop lying to your family. Stop lying to others. If you are, stop it. Stop it. The truth will set us free. And the truth look. If you are a God fearing person and you believe it requires you to believe two things, and maybe you don't, but I do. One, I believe in God. Two, I believe rights come from man and this Constitution and the founding of this nation were divinely inspired. These are God's rights and God's freedoms. Now, what we've done with them in the last 200 and some years is on our heads. We have pissed them away. We have treated them like garbage, but in the end and this is why we will be destroyed for it if we don't turn our ways. In the end they belong to him. So if we appreciate those rights, if we do the right thing, we are going to have to pay for a consequence because I'm sorry, not everybody gets a trophy just for participation. We're going to have to pay the consequence for our living and mistreating these rights. But in the end have no fear because nothing will thwart him because these are his rights. This was his Constitution. This is his country for his purposes. Not ours. And nothing, nothing will thwart him in the end. We are quite honestly in many ways pawns in a battle that has been raging since the beginning of man. Take yourself out of the hapless pawn and be part of the solution. And the only way that that happens is if you first tie yourself to him and the only way you can do that is tie yourself to the truth.

How prepared are YOU to weather a future crisis? We recently published a brand new quiz so you can find out exactly how prepared you are. Whether you're a "prepper" with a bunker fit for the apocolypse or just want to feel more secure for the future, there is always something more to learn. That's why Glenn wants to give his newsletter subscribers his "Ultimate Preparation Guide," filled with practical tips for building a solid foundation to weather future crises. And let's face it—in our crazy world right now, who couldn't use a bit more peace of mind?

Enter your email below to get "Glenn's Ultimate Preparation Guide" sent straight to your inbox!

Editor's Note: Arizona House Bill HB2770 has since been shut down! AZ Rep. Rachael Jones tweeted that the AZ Freedom Caucus shut down the bill before it could reach the board. It is encouraging to see states stepping to protect the American people from getting one step closer to a Central Bank Digital Currency. Hopefully, Arizona will be a precedent for the other states!


On today's radio broadcast, Glenn warned about dangerous Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) language being smuggled into routine legislation in REPUBLICAN-led states. This is unacceptable, and as Glenn said, we can't let this legislation pass as it now stands.

The legislation being used to smuggle in this CBDC language is the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), a routine piece of legislation passed on the state level that helps standardize commercial and business transactions. However, a new round of UCCs being deliberated RIGHT NOW amongst a swath of Republican-led states anticipate the use of "electronic money." In a public letter sent to the Republican states currently deliberating this legislation, the Pro-Family Legislative Network said this can only refer to the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) under consideration and testing by the Federal Reserve. Biden's Executive Order 14067 issued in March of 2022 started the push for CBDC, and now these states, knowingly or unknowingly, are laying the legislative groundwork for making CBDC a reality.

There is absolutely no reason why Republican-led states should aid in laying the foundation for CBDC, yet 12 of them are deliberating it RIGHT NOW, with one UCC bill already on one GOP governor's desk! We have to act NOW to stop these UCCs in their tracks and demand our lawmakers amend the bills without the "electronic money" language.

If your state is listed below, contact your representative NOW to put an end to CBDC language.

1. North Dakota

North Dakota House Bill HB1082 passed BOTH chambers and is now sitting on Governor Burgum's desk. Burgun has 3 DAYS to veto this bill once it's placed on his desk—if not, it will pass automatically. If you are a North Dakota resident, it is absolutely CRUCIAL that you contact Governor Burgum's office NOW and demand that he veto this bill and re-introduce it without the "electronic money" language.

2. Arizona

Arizona House Bill HB2770 has been shut down! See the above editor's note for more details.

3. Arkansas

Arkansas House Bill HB1588 is in committee, and if passed, will head to the House floor. Though the bill is only in its beginning stages, it's important for Arkansas residents to stop this bill in its tracks and amend it without the "electronic money" language.

4. Missouri

Missouri House Bill HB1165 is also in its beginning stages in committee. That means it's important to contact your representative as soon as possible to amend it without the "electronic money" language.

5. Oklahoma

Oklahoma House Bill HB 2776 passed the House Committee and will go to a chamber vote soon. If passed, it will go to the Senate, then the governor's desk. If you are an Indiana resident, contact your representative's office NOW to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

6. Indiana

Indiana Senate Bill SB0486 passed the Senate and is headed to the House. Republicans control Indiana's executive office and BOTH chambers of the legislature. There is no excuse for this bill to pass. If you are an Indiana resident, it's vital you contact your representative NOW and demand they amend this bill without the "electronic money" language.

7. Kentucky

Kentucky Senate Bill SB64 passed the Senate and is now being deliberated in the House. If you live in Kentucky, contact your representative's office to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

8. Montana

Montana Senate Bill SB370 passed the Senate and was sent to the House on March 3rd. If you are a Montana resident, contact your representative's office NOW so that the bill doesn't without changing the "electronic money" language.

9. Nebraska

Nebraska's Legislative Bill LB94 passed committee and the first floor vote. As Nebraska only has one legislative chamber, this bill is dangerously close to passing the legislature and being sent to the governor's desk. If you are a Nebraska resident, contact your representative's office NOW and demand they amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

10. New Hampshire

New Hampshire House Bill HB584 is currently in House committee deliberations and has not yet reached the House floor. If you are a New Hampshire resident, contact your representative's office NOW to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

11. Tennessee

Tennessee House Bill HB0640 didn't successfully pass the House. However, it was deferred to a Senate committee and has now taken the form of Senate Bill SB0479, which is now in committee. This bill is still alive, and it's important for you, Tennessee residents, to stop it before it reaches the floor! Contact your representative to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

12. Texas

Texas House Bill HB5011 was filed and is ready to be taken up by committee. Fellow Texans, let's not let this bill progress any further! Contact your representative and demand they amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

6 things you NEED to know about the Silicon Valley Bank collapse

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

Silicon Valley Bank's collapse is sparking traumatic memories of the 2008 financial crash. Should we be worried SVB is signaling a similar economic catastrophe, or is everyone overreacting to the media's hype? Glenn told his listeners to be "healthily terrified." This event is sure to have ripple effects throughout the economy, but the more you are informed about it, the more you can prepare. Here are 6 things you need to know about Silicon Valley Bank's crash—explained in simple words.

1. The short answer to what happened: SVB didn't have enough money to pay its depositors.

Remember the scene from It's a Wonderful Life when all of the residents make a run on George Bailey's bank demanding their money? Fortunately for them, their money was in the altruistic hands of George Bailey, who used his honeymoon savings to give the depositors the money they demanded.

Silicon Valley Bank's depositors weren't so lucky.

In short, the depositors made a run on Silicon Valley Bank, demanding the withdrawal of their money. But SVB simply didn't have the liquid money available to give their depositors, causing regulators to shut down the bank shortly afterward.

2. It all started with COVID...

Why didn't SVB have enough money for its depositors? To explain this, we have to go back to the pandemic era.

The pandemic saw a rapid decrease in spending and a massive increase in bank deposits. Due to the uncertainty of the future and lockdowns limiting ways to spend money on recreational activities, like restaurants, bars, and other outlets, many Americans stocked up money in their accounts. In fact, SVB's deposits doubled in 2021 alone, bringing in more money than they could lend out to their clients.

To make a return on their available cash, SVB wanted to invest it, as many banks do. Since they had reached their lending limit, they decided to invest it in U.S. Treasury Securities, which are the government's means of funding itself without using taxation (in a nutshell). These are considered "ultra-safe" investments because they are backed by the "full faith and credit of the federal government."

Unlike other forms of investments, investing in Treasuries means the government will do everything within its legal power to pay back the money used to fund itself. In other words, it is typically very safe... so what happened?

3. Then came the magic cocktail—record-high inflation and rising interest rates...

Interest rates ruined the typically "ultra-safe" investment. Due to 40-year record-high inflation, the Fed lifted rates eight times by a total of 4.25 percentage points in 2022, raising interest rates from 0.25 percent to 4.375 percent. This means the value of U.S. Treasuries investments plummeted rapidly. SVB reported that it lost $1.8 billion due to the decreased value of its Treasuries investments after a year of rising interest rates.

This raises the following question: why didn't SVB just weather the storm and wait for interest rates to decrease? There are two issues with this. The first is that, with so many of their assets held up in Treasuries investments, SVB still wouldn't have enough liquid assets to give their depositors during the bank run.

The second issue is that Treasuries investments have a ten-year limit. In 2021 during the Trump administration, interest rates were at an all-time low of 0.125 percent.

The record-fast increase of interest rates in 2022 caused very little chance for rates to go back down to their historic 2021 lows within ten years for banks to make their money back on their investments.

To avoid this, SVB planned to sell their investments at a loss and re-purchase Treasuries investments at the decreased value, giving them an extra ten years to bet on decreased interest rates in the future.

But people caught on to SVB's plan and didn't want to ride with the risk.

4. Account holders withdrew their money... FAST.

As aforementioned, SVP lost $1.8 billion when it sold its depleted Treasuries investments. While they were betting on being able to re-purchase the devalued securities, hoping that they would go up in value in the future with lowered interest rates, investors were worried about the risk.

Once they made the announcement of their $1.8 billion loss, their stocks began to drop, and venture capitalists warned the companies they invest in to pull out of SVB. This had a snowball effect, leading to a "bank run" of depositors demanding to withdraw their money from their SVB accounts.

This led to the perfect storm: SVB's investment losses coupled with the influx of withdrawals were so immense that regulators had to step in and shut the bank down to protect depositors. The government currently "running" SVB, for all practical purposes, is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC closed SVB on Friday and reopened the bank on Monday, March 13th as the Deposit Insurance Bank of Santa Clara.

5. Some people may lose their money. 

Banks insure accounts with $250,000 or less with FDIC insurance. That means, in cases of bank failure, exactly like this one, the FDIC covers all accounts less than $250,000. The FDIC said SVB customers who had less than $250,000 in their accounts will have access to all of their money when the bank reopens. Since it reopened this week, they should have access to their funds.

However, many of SVB's depositors had more than $250,000 in their accounts—it is Silicon Valley after all. Therefore, their accounts were not covered by FDIC insurance. Will they get their money back? There is a chance that they will not.

It is unclear how much SVB currently has to cover uninsured deposits. It is likely not enough. The FDIC has issued a "Receiver's Certificate" to the uninsured account holders with the amount in their account that is not covered by FDIC insurance.

The FDIC said it will pay some of the uninsured deposits by next week by liquidating any additional assets held by SVB. However, if the liquidated assets are not enough, many of SVB's uninsured account holders could lose their money for good.

6. Is this 2008 all over again?

SVB's collapse was the largest bank failure since 2008, when Washington Mutual failed with $307 billion in assets. Its failure, along with the collapse of the Lehman Brother's investment bank, triggered the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Are we in danger of repeating 2008?

Some argue that we are not in danger of another economic catastrophe, simply because SVB holds less than 1 percent of the nation's assets. However, as Glenn warns, there is a danger of banks repeating the same mistakes as SVP.

SVP wasn't the only bank to use its surplus deposits to invest in U.S. Treasuries, which means that other banks are wrestling with the depleted value of their securities investments due to rising interest rates.

Bank of America, for example, lost $109 billion in their securities investments due to rising interest rates, the most among its peers—and Bank of America is no small fish in the ocean of assets.

Other major banks recorded other massive losses in their securities investments due to rising interest rates. JP Morgan Chase lost $36 billion, Wells Fargo lost $41 billion, Citigroup lost $25 billion, and Goldman Sachs lost $1 billion. If the little banks collapse, will they get the same effort and attention from the federal government as the "big guys?"

The critic may argue that these are still small values given the incredibly large amount of assets held in banks nationwide. However, this is missing the point. Major banks have majorly invested in securities since the pandemic-era skyrocketing rate of deposits. Now those investments are depleted in value.

They can either sell those investments at a loss, or they can wait and hope that they will recover over time. However, if those investments are no longer liquid, what happens when their depositors come knocking? Will they have enough liquid assets to cover a massive bank run? These are the lingering questions that our banks need to address.

As Glenn says, this will impact you—it is only a matter of time. What will you do to prepare?

Glenn just purchased the entire historical Roe v. Wade archive as a solemn reminder of our nation's past and the vital importance of honoring the sacredness of life. Since Roe was overturned in 2022, many states have been stepping up to protect both their unborn citizens AND the mothers carrying them.

Which states are doing the most to protect their most vulnerable? Here are the top 12 states with the strictest laws against abortion.

1. Alabama

​Alabama has some of the nation's most protective pro-life measures, banning all abortions in the case of life-threatening circumstances for the mother. That means abortion is banned at every ​stage of pregnancy. Health care providers found guilty of performing abortions face a class-A felony, the most serious charge besides Capitol Murder, with the potential of carrying a life sentence in prison. However, the pill, Plan B, is classified as "contraception" rather than abortion. Taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures except in very limited circumstances.

Alabama is one of the few states to add protections within its state constitution for the unborn. The state:

Acknowledges, declares, and affirms that it is the public policy of this state to recognize and support the sanctity of unborn life and the rights of unborn children, including the right to life.

2. Arkansas

Like Alabama, Arkansas bans abortion at every stage of pregnancy except in life-threatening situations for the mother. However, Plan B is still considered "contraception" and is legal. Taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures except in very limited circumstances. Additionally, Arkansas added the amendment to its state constitution, declaring:

The policy of Arkansas is to protect the life of every unborn child from conception until birth, to the extent permitted by the Federal Constitution.

3. Idaho

Idaho bans abortions at every stage of pregnancy with the exceptions of life-threatening situations to the mother and instances of rape and incest. The health care practitioner who gave an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Patients approved for abortion must wait 24 hours after counseling to receive the procedure. Anyone who performs an abortion unless it's in one of the approved cases will face felony charges. Like Alabama and Arkansas, taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures.

Unlike Alabama and Arkansas, Idaho law does not include explicit constitutional or statutory protections for abortion.

4. Kentucky

Kentucky has also banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy except in life-threatening situations for the mother. There are no exceptions for rape or incest. However, abortion providers are fighting the all-out ban on abortion through appealing to the state's previous abortion ban after six weeks of pregnancy. The appeal is ongoing.

Though Kentucky voters voted down a proposal to add an amendment to the state constitution banning abortion, the state adopted the following policy towards abortion in 2018:

Children, whether born or unborn, are the greatest natural resource in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

5. Louisiana

Louisiana also banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy with no exceptions for rape or incest. However there is an appeal to allow abortions in the case of rape and incest. Healthcare practitioners who violate this ban are subject to criminal prosecution. Moreover, Louisiana adopted an amendment in their state constitution—specifically, the Louisiana Declaration of Rights, banning the construction of any constitutional right to abortion:

To protect human life, nothing in present constitution shall be construed to secure or protect a right to abortion or require the funding of abortion.

6. Mississippi

Mississippi bans all abortions except to save the life of the mother or in cases of rape or incest that have been reported to law enforcement. Though Mississippi did not adopt a constitutional amendment to ban abortion as a right, the Mississippi Code says:

Abortion carries significant physical and psychological risks to the maternal patient, and these physical and psychological risks increase with gestational age.

Moreover, doctors who perform illegal abortions face civil and criminal charges.

7. Missouri

Missouri bans all abortions except in the case of a medical emergency concerning the mother, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Those seeking to get an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Minors seeking an abortion through "affirmative defense" must do so with parental consent. Moreover, those seeking an abortion must be offered an ultrasound.

Moreover, Missouri adopted the following statute protecting the unborn:

It is the intention of the general assembly of the state of Missouri to: (1) [d]efend the right to life of all humans, born and unborn; (2) [d]eclare that the state and all of its political subdivisions are a ‘sanctuary of life’ that protects pregnant women and their unborn children; and (3) [r]egulate abortion to the full extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States, decisions of the United States Supreme Court, and federal statutes.

8. Oklahoma

Oklahoma was the first state to successfully ban all abortions after conception following the overturn of Roe v. Wade and continues to lead the way as one of the toughest states on abortion. Exceptions include life-saving procedures for the mother or pregnancies resulting from "rape, sexual assault, or incest." Those who perform legal abortions can be reported and prosecuted criminally under state law HB427 and be charged at least $10,000 per illegal abortion procedure. Violations also include insurance companies or private citizens caught funding abortions.

Though Oklahoma has not adopted a state constitutional amendment concerning abortion, its Public Health Code states that it cannot be “construed as creating or recognizing right to abortion."

9. South Dakota

South Dakota bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases for the mother. There are no exceptions for rape and incest. However, it is legal to travel out of state to get an abortion. There are no state constitutional provisions protecting against abortion.

10. Tennessee

Tennessee bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases for the mother. There is currently a movement in the Tennessee state legislature to enact exceptions for rape and incest. Like Idaho and Missouri, healthcare practitioners who gave an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Those who provide abortions illegally can be criminally prosecuted.

Tennessee's state constitution was amended to supersede a 2000 Tennessee supreme court case, which held:

A woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy is a vital part of the right to privacy guaranteed by the Tennessee Constitution [and that] the right is inherent in the concept of ordered liberty embodied in our constitution and is therefore fundamental.

The new state constitutional amendment reads as follows:

Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of an abortion.

11. Texas

Texas bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases concerning the mother. There is a movement in the Texas state legislature to provide exemptions for rape and incest.

Moreover, Texas received a lot of heat for its law not only criminalizing providing illegal abortions but enabled citizens to report illegal abortions. However, several cities in Texas are pushing back against the abortion ban. After Dobbs, Texas increased the penalties for performing an abortion up to life in prison, including a civil penalty of no less than $100,000 per abortion performed.

Attorney General Ken Paxton said the following:

Now that the Supreme Court has finally overturned Roe, I will do everything in my power to protect mothers, families, and unborn children, and to uphold the state laws duly enacted by the Texas Legislature.

The cities of Austin and San Antonio passed ordinances preventing city funds from being used to investigate the provision or receipt of abortion care.

12. West Virginia

West Virginia bans abortion at all stages of pregnancy, except in the case of a “nonmedically viable fetus”, ectopic pregnancy, or medical emergency. According to the West Virginia state legislature, "Nonmedically viable fetus" means:

A fetus that contains sufficient lethal fetal anomalies so as to render the fetus medically futile or incompatible with life outside the womb in the reasonable medical judgment of a reasonably prudent physician.

Victims of rape and incest can obtain abortions up to eight weeks after conception, but only if they report to law enforcement first.

In 2018, West Virginians voted to add the following language to the state constitution:

Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of abortion.