Glenn Beck: Coburn - Pelosi rox, Fox does not


American Revival - Phoenix, April 10th


Glenn Beck's American Revival is a daylong event where you can find information, inspiration, and the preparation to help turn this country around...


 - Tickets now available!

GLENN: Tom Coburn, isn't he the great Republican hope? Isn't he one of the great Republican hopes?

PAT: Definitely one of them, yeah.

GLENN: Right?

PAT: He's one of the

GLENN: Isn't Tom Coburn, is he the same as Nancy Pelosi?

PAT: Yeah, he's one of those names they threw out.

GLENN: Right? When I said that about CPAC, you know, and there is, I mean, I'm sorry that I don't have footnotes on everything I say all the time. It does require you to have a little bit of critical thinking and give me the little bit the benefit of the doubt. But when I was at CPAC, I was afterwards hunted by some of the Republicans because I'm beginning to think in some ways literally the because they were saying, oh, you think they're all no, no, no. I think Michele Bachmann is one of them. I think what's his name, Jim DeMint is one of them. Tom Coburn was thrown up in my face, and I don't know. I don't know about Tom Coburn. Maybe. Maybe he's not. Maybe he is. But then he comes out today and he's got an article against Fox News.

PAT: Yeah, he was defending Nancy Pelosi to a group of people and

GLENN: I'm sorry. He was what?

PAT: He was defending Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: I'm sorry. He was what?

PAT: Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: He was what?

PAT: Defending Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: How was he, what

PAT: Well, they were yelling about her because they're hacked off at healthcare.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: And they're mad at Nancy Pelosi because she went against the will of the people and oh, she's a nice person; you don't know. So here's his quote.

GLENN: When he was what?

PAT: Defending Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: All right.

PAT: And attacking Fox News.

STU: Are your headphones working, Glenn, because he said that several times.

GLENN: I'm thinking maybe that we speak a different language. It sounded to me can you translate? It sounded to me that the Republican that I'm supposed to defend because he's so unlike Nancy Pelosi was defending Nancy Pelosi.

STU: That is definitely what he said. I'm just saying that you are not hearing because you keep asking him to repeat it and I think there might be a problem technically with the program.

PAT: Either with the headphones or the ears.

GLENN: No, I just don't

PAT: that the headphones are supplying.

GLENN: No, I think I may be one of the only people on planet Earth whose brain is still functioning. All right, go ahead. What did he say?

PAT: Let me give you the quote. Okay, because he's obviously, I think what he's trying to do initially is separate the person from the policy which is fair.

GLENN: Absolutely.

PAT: You like her as a person, whatever.

GLENN: Whatever.

PAT: But here's what he says.

GLENN: I don't know her. So I don't not like her.

PAT: And by the way, this is credit and this is context nobody else would give us.

GLENN: No, no, never.

PAT: Never. What we have to do is make sure we have a debate in this country so that you can see what's going on and make a determination yourself. He continues, Tom Coburn: So don't catch yourself being biased by Fox News that somebody is no good. The people in Washington are good. They just don't know what they don't know. Now see, unquote.

GLENN: Hang on just a second.

PAT: That's a lie. They know.

GLENN: No, no. No, no.

PAT: He's saying that Nancy Pelosi doesn't know.

GLENN: She does.

PAT: She knows.

GLENN: But if he's going to make a blanket statement about those in Washington that just don't know, let me just say this. I think we understand that there are really colossally stupid people in Washington. Guam may capsize.

STU: (Laughing).

GLENN: Okay?

PAT: Okay, yeah.

GLENN: So there are those people who are just, "Okay, George." Got it? I think there is a number of people on both sides of the aisle, dumb as a box of rocks. No different than the general population. There are dumb people around us. Then beyond that there are those who know exactly what they're doing. Nancy Pelosi is one of them. Don't tell me that she's a genius and she doesn't know. She was the architect of getting this one done!

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Don't tell me that she's that smart and stupid.

PAT: She was the one who with 30,000 people there to oppose this bill and they did it peacefully, by the way. They're gathered outside. She takes a giant stinking gavel and parades her and her fellow

GLENN: Progressives.

PAT: Progressives right through the middle of these people trying to provoke them.

GLENN: That she has said, that she has been one of the leaders saying these people are dangerous

PAT: I'm going to pole vault them.

GLENN: They're dangerous, we'll just climb over their wall, we'll pole vault them. She goes through that. She knows exactly what she's doing.

PAT: Absolutely.

GLENN: Now Tom, let me ask you this: If there are those in Washington that are destroying our economy, destroying our freedoms and they just don't know what they don't know, then you should name the frickin' names so we can get those people out of office. If you are so if you are not dumb as a box of rocks and you're not part of an evil cabal of progressivism but you just don't know, then help us educate those people or get them out. You are so irresponsible that you said you would protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and you're telling me the people who say, "I just don't know if it's in the Constitution, I don't really care about the Constitution. I don't check the Constitution. I didn't read the bill," that's because they don't know? That's criminal incompetence. Criminal incompetence.

STU: And I don't know of anyone who has said anything about how delightful Nancy Pelosi is at brunch. She might be a great lady. The point is not that she's no good but that she's no good for the country.

GLENN: Yeah, I don't really care about

STU: She's hurting the country with her policies.

GLENN: Nobody see, this is what the left wants to do. The left, believe me, someday I think I have probably four books that need to be published and they will be published either upon my death or when I'm just ready to just disappear. One of them is on the media, things I've learned. Another one is on politics and things I've learned. Another one is you want threats? Let me show you the volumes of threats. The left would like to cut people's heads off. This is a favorite one: Rape and molest your children? They will do anything to shut you up. Anything to shut you up. I don't want to shut Nancy Pelosi up. She has a right to say whatever she wants. Live within the Constitution and have an honest debate. That's all I want. That's all I want.

PAT: One of the biggest problems I think we have in this country is that we've allowed the left to reposition what hateful rhetoric is. We are opposed to policies and that's what we talk about every day. Sometimes we do it in a colorful way, but when we're talking about

GLENN: But so do they. So does everyone.

PAT: Of course they do. Of course they do. And when you say that Nancy Pelosi is disregarding the will of the American people, that's not hateful rhetoric. That's fact!

GLENN: When I say that these, that Van Jones is a communist, that's not hateful rhetoric.

PAT: That's fact.

GLENN: Those are his words. When I say Jim Wallis is a Marxist, that's not hateful rhetoric. Those are his words. When I say Andy Stern loves to have the workers of the world unite, was a part of SDS, the Students For Democratic Society, those are not hateful, that's not hateful rhetoric. Those are facts. When I lay out the case on Barack Obama like we did last night on television, that's not hateful. There is not a single judgment of the man. Is he a good man or a bad man. Not once have I judged him as a good man or a bad man. What I'm trying to do is expose who he is. You can expose who I am because I made a decision when I first got back, when I honestly when I damn near lost my soul, came to the end and realized I either have to find a way to hold onto my soul and be happy or I'm going to die. I decided that I would do everything I could do put my life back. Well, I did that in 1999. I did everything I could. Now, I was not a perfect man, nor am I a perfect man today. But I do everything I can to put my life back in order. You want to expose me for who I am? That's okay. We'll have an honest debate. I'll tell you exactly what I think. I'll tell you exactly what I believe. I'll tell you exactly what policies I think should be done, and you can combat that. But that's not what these people want to do. They just want to destroy you. And they do not want their policies, their principles, the things that they believe in exposed. Why does America want transparency? Because anything that is happening behind closed doors we need to know about. We need to know about it. I'll tell you the things that happened behind closed doors with me. I'll tell you those things. I'll tell you that I'm not a perfect person. I've made mistakes in my life. I've already told you all of those things, but I did something about those things, and I changed my life. The things I don't tell you now, I don't tell you for security reasons. It is a bizarre world. It is an upside down, inside out, quantum physics world. But I promise you this: Because of who these people are, they will expose themselves. Now, the question is, we've lived beyond our means far too long. We wanted to take the easy way out far too long, and our country is on the eve of destruction, whether that be from the Republicans or the Democrats that spend us into oblivion, it is the eve of destruction in America. How do we fix it? With the truth. Not with guns. Not with riots. With the truth. You must start telling the truth in your own life to yourself. Stop lying to yourself. Stop lying to your family. Stop lying to others. If you are, stop it. Stop it. The truth will set us free. And the truth look. If you are a God fearing person and you believe it requires you to believe two things, and maybe you don't, but I do. One, I believe in God. Two, I believe rights come from man and this Constitution and the founding of this nation were divinely inspired. These are God's rights and God's freedoms. Now, what we've done with them in the last 200 and some years is on our heads. We have pissed them away. We have treated them like garbage, but in the end and this is why we will be destroyed for it if we don't turn our ways. In the end they belong to him. So if we appreciate those rights, if we do the right thing, we are going to have to pay for a consequence because I'm sorry, not everybody gets a trophy just for participation. We're going to have to pay the consequence for our living and mistreating these rights. But in the end have no fear because nothing will thwart him because these are his rights. This was his Constitution. This is his country for his purposes. Not ours. And nothing, nothing will thwart him in the end. We are quite honestly in many ways pawns in a battle that has been raging since the beginning of man. Take yourself out of the hapless pawn and be part of the solution. And the only way that that happens is if you first tie yourself to him and the only way you can do that is tie yourself to the truth.

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, a transgender activist called for a "Supreme Court Assassination Challenge" on Twitter, according to screenshots captured of the now-deleted tweet.

Activist Eli Erlick, a founding member of Trans Student Educational Resources (TSER) and creator of the controversial "gender identity" teaching tool for children called the "Gender Unicorn," tweeted and later deleted the disturbing remark on Friday, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) also caught a screenshot of the tweet before it was deleted.

"The unhinged radical left is calling for the assassination of our Supreme Court Justices. That's not the way to disagree with a decision in America. It is unacceptable, and Biden’s DOJ must immediately act," Blackburn responded on Twitter.

Erlich then tried to play off her call to assassinate Supreme Court justices as a hilarious joke only Gen Z and Millennials would understand, apparently not understanding the seriousness of the attempted assassination of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh just three weeks ago.

Erlick isn't the only Left-winger to make incendiary calls since the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision. Here are just a few examples:

  • Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) called on people to “defy" the Supreme Court.
  • Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) called for people to get “into the streets” alongside radical communist leader who wants to 'overthrow' the American system.
  • Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot (D) yelled "F*** Clarence Thomas" on a public stage for all to see and hear.
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) suggested that Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh lied to Congress.
  • And of course, "TheView" host Whoopi Goldberg issued a disgusting racist threat toward Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Filling in for Glenn Beck on the radio program, BlazeTV hosts Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere took a look at these and other stunning examples of leftist lunacy over the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Watch the video clip below. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Many members of the far-left already are calling for a ‘Night of Rage’ after the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, and the White House has been discussing plans to defy the ruling too. In fact, one idea floated by Biden Administration officials, according to the New York Times, includes providing abortions on military bases. So, will America experience another summer of riots? Are YOUR taxpayer dollars at risk? And what does this mean for deep-blue states? Josh Hammer, legal expert and opinion editor for Newsweek, joins Glenn to discuss what may come next...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Josh Hammer, he's the opinion editor of Newsweek. He's the host of the Josh Hammer show. He is really quite brilliant. One of the leading minds in the conservative movement, I think. Josh Hammer joins us now.

To tell us, what did you find in this decision?

JOSH: Glenn, great to be back with you, on such a momentous, and really such an emotional day, honestly. So, you know, look, as you said, this dropped recently. Funny enough, I was in the middle of getting a guest lecture from an organization on the advisory board as to when it drops. So I barely had any time to kind of skim through, let alone guess the concerning dissenting opinions. But it looks like this looks very similar, to the draft opinion that was leaked, by the Politico story, a month and a half ago, in early May. And I think those of us who were praying that the five justices from this leaked draft opinion, would have the fortitude to stiffen their spines against this unprecedented assault. Now knows that our prayers were answered, Glenn. That's really my takeaway right now.

This looks a lot like the leaked opinion. Justice Thomas and Justice Kavanaugh have some reconcurring opinions.

But unbelievable. And really just holding aside the constitutional law stuff for a second hear. Just speaking as pro-lifers, on a day like today, I think we really just need to pause. And I tweeted this out earlier. We need to just be grateful for our half century of pro-life activist forbearers. You know, this -- Glenn, this issue could have gone away after 1973. That was a long time ago. 1973. I mean, this issue could have just gone away. We owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to the pro-life moral activist. Political activist. And, of course, yes. Legal activist. Who fought day in and day out, that makes sure this great injustice stayed front and center of our national, political conscience. And in many days, the culmination of a half century of fighting for truth and justice. But in many ways, it's also a new beginning for the pro-life fight as well, interestingly.

STU: How do you mean a new beginning for the fight? I just it's going to turn, I think we're going to see abortion turn even darker in those states that allow it. Is that -- is that what you're meaning by this?

JOSH: Well, look, for a half century now, Roe vs. Wade, and its project any, specifically, the Planned Parenthood versus Casey case of 1992.

They took away from the states obviously. They arrogated authority away from the states, the ability to attempt to nationally codify one view of the morality of abortion.

It happened to be a profoundly immoral view. So these -- the fight now shifts to the states. And the pro-life activists. And all the 50 states. Especially, obviously in red states. Purple states. I mean, admittedly some blue states like New York and California, probably won't be able to touch them there.

But we have to make sure that our side is well positioned in the state Capitols for every red, purplish, probably even light blue state, to make sure we fight for successful, cogent, and morally consistent pro-life legislation. The state of Oklahoma, actually, just north of Texas. Right where you are now, Glenn. They have been leading on this actually. Governor Kevin Stitt signed into law, a fantastic pro-life bill there in Oklahoma. A few weeks ago. Maybe a month ago or so at this point, that basically just bans abortion straightforward from conception. And there are some -- you know, obviously, likable the mother. So forth. But we really need to start thinking about trying to craft legislation now, at the state level. But to your point, I do fear that the blue states will only double down in their radicalism. Unfortunately within that will only lead to an ever greater divide, in our country, that we have today. But obviously, at the end of the day. We're going to save at the end of the day, millions and millions of unborn children. We are going to save human beings who can grow up to cure cancer, who can win Nobel prices.

I mean, this is just a tremendous win for the human species. I don't know how to say it other than that.

GLENN: I will tell you, I saw the stat, that I think it was last year or the year before. 20 percent of all pregnancies ended in abortion. 20 percent.

JOSH: Wow.

GLENN: That is -- that is a shocking number. And we do have our -- our work cut out for us. Because I -- I think that these states are going to double down. But I think, you know -- God doesn't waste anything. You know, there is no waste with God. Even the -- even the worst things that could possibly happen, turn out to be something good. You know what I mean? You're like, holy cow, how did that just happen.

And I think that evil is going to fully come unmasked. I'm telling you, Josh. I don't know how you feel about this. I think this could be the day of America's Kristallnacht. I can see these pro-life centers being burned to the ground today. They're calling for a night of rage around the country. I think evil is going to show itself. And that will scare the American people, hopefully.

JOSH: You know, I've been thinking about this a lot this week, actually. Because I've been bracing for a new kind of George Floyd summer of love, happening this summer. Coming to a city or suburb near you. Unfortunately, myself. Look, I live in Florida. I know, Glenn, you live in Texas. It is in moments like this, where I do think that where you live matters. And who your mayor is. Who your governor is, matters.

Because law and order and rioting and anarchy is not really a federal issue. It is to a limited extent. June 2020, Tom Cotton wrote this op-ed that was pretty controversial at the time.

I happen to agree with it. Where he said, quote, unquote, send in the troops. And there is some federal legislation from the reconstruction era that would justify that.

But most kind of quelling and quashing of anarchy does happen. Constitutionally speaking, at the state and local level. So at a moment like this, where I fear that you're probably not wrong. I take some solace. That Governor DeSantis is my governor. I think Texans should take some solace, that they are represented by -- by a Republican governor. The legislature there as well. So I -- I fear that you are right. I pray obviously, that no one -- it's hard.

I fear that it's something -- that something bad is happening. At the end of the day, of course. It does not mean that justices cannot do what they are supposed to do. So thank God they did that.

GLENN: So, Josh, have you looked into what the White House has been saying? The White House yesterday. In fact, do we have a clip of -- of this?

What the White House said yesterday, about the guns. And then they were turned to the -- the Scott us ruling, for Roe vs. Wade. Do we have that, please?

JOSH: Will the president accept this decision, even if he disagrees with it?

VOICE: I think it's going to come from the Supreme Court. So it's a decision we certainly are going to respond to. I'll leave it at that. Just like any other Supreme Court decision. Just like the one they did today on guns.

GLENN: So the White House won't say that they're going to accept it.

Which I don't think they will. They're talking now about taking doctors and moving them into places like Oklahoma or Texas, where abortions will be outlawed. And putting doctors on our military bases to perform abortions.

I mean, where does this go, when you have a government, that is in defiance of -- of one branch of the government?

JOSH: So there's a lot to unpack here. So we should start from first principles. The idea of judicial supremacy, and this is a peculiar thing, to say on a day like today, where such a pro-life victory has happened in Italy. But if we're going to be consistent here, the idea of judicial supremacy. The idea that the justices, have the sole and exclusive ability to interpret the Constitution for themselves. And no other Constitutional actor, in article one or article two, let alone the state. Has the ability to tentatively interpret it. That is erroneous. In fact, actually it was really Abraham Lincoln actually, who in the Dred Scott case, famously opposed judicial supremacy and flouted the Dred Scott ruling, at least as it pertains to everybody other than Dred Scott himself. I have actually argued, a former legal scholarship, in a law review article actually, that the Laconian view of how each branch of government should interpret the Constitution for itself, is correct.

Having said that. Having said that, there is a thing called prudence. And there is a thing called comedy. And in a moment like today, when it really does look like -- and I agree with you, that we are now bracing for riots through the streets. When the political rhetoric is at DEFCON one. When people are trying to assassinate Supreme Court justices. I think it would be -- at its bare minimum, a profoundly imprudent act. For the Biden administration, to try to undermine this ruling.

Now, what they might do, is they might try to kind of issue some kind of executive orders, or issue some regulations, that might try to kind of undermine it, at the edges here. But at the end of the day, the idea that this returns to the state. There's not really a whole lot they can do about that. Basically, at this point, throughout the country. Kentucky within West Virginia. Kansas. Whatever. If they want to go ahead and ban abortion, what can the Biden administration literally do about that? I mean, short of sending in the National Guard, to protect Planned Parenthood, if the state legislature of Kentucky goes ahead and bans it. There's not a whole lot they can do. And it's very difficult to envision a world, in which the Biden administration literally sends in troops to red states, to protect Planned Parenthood, if that state legislature goes ahead and bans it. So for practically speaking. This is a lot of tough talk and rhetoric. Obviously the campaign here in 2022. There's not really a whole lot that practically speaking, they can do to actually prevent red and purple states from enacting pro-life legislation.

GLENN: I'm glad to -- I'm glad to hear that. I know that they have been working on things. I mean, he has said, you know, there's executive orders, that I can employ. There are things that I can do. He's talked about a national public health emergency. Which I think is just -- is crazy. But I would hope, that the president would come out and say, we strongly disagree with this. And you're right. The court is not the end all. But the court did not end abortion. It just said, the people should decide. I think that's the best kind of court ruling, on any of it. The people should decide what this is. And send it back to the states. Josh, I thank you very much. Appreciate your time. Was there -- there was another ruling, that came out today. Was it important?

JOSH: Oh, no. In comparison to this. A total nothing burger. A 5-4 decision on Medicare reimbursement related. So nothing, honestly.

GLENN: Great. Thank you very much. Appreciate it, Josh. Josh Hammer, opinion editor for Newsweek. And the host of the Josh Hammer show.

GLENN: There are two things trending on twitter right now.

Number one is praise God.

Number two trend is Night of Rage.

Good verses evil.

Build up or tear down.

'Lord, we are SORRY it has taken us this long': BlazeTV hosts react to historic Roe v. Wade decision

Photo by Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

The Supreme Court of the United States officially overturned Roe V. Wade, and the debate over abortion rights has been given back to the states. On this historic day, BlazeTV hosts celebrate the Supreme Court's incredible decision and take a look at some of the insane reactions as the left comes completely undone.

Jason Whitlock: Today will forever stand as a pivotal moment in our nation’s history

The Supreme Court of the United States overturned Roe v. Wade. The decision and the reaction to it have already revealed a lot about our people and politics. Pro-life groups celebrate, pro-choice groups call for “a night of rage,” and Nancy Pelosi just seems completely confused by the United States Constitution.

Glenn Beck reacts LIVE to Roe v. Wade ruling: 'Lord, we are SORRY it has taken us this long'

I never thought that in my lifetime, I would see Roe v. Wade be overturned. But today, that day has come. The Supreme Court has voted 6 to 3 to return decisions about abortion to the states. But this fight isn't over. We are about to see good versus evil side by side. Many states will stand with the unborn. But others will become abortion mills. It's your turn to choose now, America!

Allie Beth Stuckey: 'Praise God, Roe v. Wade is overturned!'

I don't know about you, but I just had the most euphoric feelings. It almost seems too good to be true. I didn't think there was any way that this would actually happen, especially with all the backlash, intimidation, and violence toward the Supreme Court justices. And yet, here we are. Roe v. Wade has been overturned. This is an amazing day!

Dave Rubin: Big disagreement on what happens next now that Roe v. Wade is overturned

Dave Rubin, Libby Emmons, Jeffrey A. Tucker, and David Reaboi debate what will happen in the wake of the Supreme Court’s breaking decision on Roe v. Wade. Now that abortion rights have been pushed back to the states, will there be a summer of massive riots or not? Will the Roe v. Wade ruling make America’s political polarization significantly worse?

Stu Burguiere: Here are the reasons SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade

I never thought this would happen. I never thought I would see this day. I just never ever ever ever never ever believed that Roe v. Wade would actually be overturned. I really didn't. But let's take a look at the reasons this day has finally come ...

The Rick & Bubba Show: 'This is history! Unfortunately we're 60 million lives too late'

We were live on the air when news broke of the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.