Glenn Beck: Coburn - Pelosi rox, Fox does not


American Revival - Phoenix, April 10th


Glenn Beck's American Revival is a daylong event where you can find information, inspiration, and the preparation to help turn this country around...


 - Tickets now available!


GLENN: Tom Coburn, isn't he the great Republican hope? Isn't he one of the great Republican hopes?

PAT: Definitely one of them, yeah.

GLENN: Right?

PAT: He's one of the

GLENN: Isn't Tom Coburn, is he the same as Nancy Pelosi?

PAT: Yeah, he's one of those names they threw out.

GLENN: Right? When I said that about CPAC, you know, and there is, I mean, I'm sorry that I don't have footnotes on everything I say all the time. It does require you to have a little bit of critical thinking and give me the little bit the benefit of the doubt. But when I was at CPAC, I was afterwards hunted by some of the Republicans because I'm beginning to think in some ways literally the because they were saying, oh, you think they're all no, no, no. I think Michele Bachmann is one of them. I think what's his name, Jim DeMint is one of them. Tom Coburn was thrown up in my face, and I don't know. I don't know about Tom Coburn. Maybe. Maybe he's not. Maybe he is. But then he comes out today and he's got an article against Fox News.

PAT: Yeah, he was defending Nancy Pelosi to a group of people and

GLENN: I'm sorry. He was what?

PAT: He was defending Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: I'm sorry. He was what?

PAT: Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: He was what?

PAT: Defending Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: How was he, what

PAT: Well, they were yelling about her because they're hacked off at healthcare.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: And they're mad at Nancy Pelosi because she went against the will of the people and oh, she's a nice person; you don't know. So here's his quote.

GLENN: When he was what?

PAT: Defending Nancy Pelosi.

GLENN: All right.

PAT: And attacking Fox News.

STU: Are your headphones working, Glenn, because he said that several times.

GLENN: I'm thinking maybe that we speak a different language. It sounded to me can you translate? It sounded to me that the Republican that I'm supposed to defend because he's so unlike Nancy Pelosi was defending Nancy Pelosi.

STU: That is definitely what he said. I'm just saying that you are not hearing because you keep asking him to repeat it and I think there might be a problem technically with the program.

PAT: Either with the headphones or the ears.

GLENN: No, I just don't

PAT: that the headphones are supplying.

GLENN: No, I think I may be one of the only people on planet Earth whose brain is still functioning. All right, go ahead. What did he say?

PAT: Let me give you the quote. Okay, because he's obviously, I think what he's trying to do initially is separate the person from the policy which is fair.

GLENN: Absolutely.

PAT: You like her as a person, whatever.

GLENN: Whatever.

PAT: But here's what he says.

GLENN: I don't know her. So I don't not like her.

PAT: And by the way, this is credit and this is context nobody else would give us.

GLENN: No, no, never.

PAT: Never. What we have to do is make sure we have a debate in this country so that you can see what's going on and make a determination yourself. He continues, Tom Coburn: So don't catch yourself being biased by Fox News that somebody is no good. The people in Washington are good. They just don't know what they don't know. Now see, unquote.

GLENN: Hang on just a second.

PAT: That's a lie. They know.

GLENN: No, no. No, no.

PAT: He's saying that Nancy Pelosi doesn't know.

GLENN: She does.

PAT: She knows.

GLENN: But if he's going to make a blanket statement about those in Washington that just don't know, let me just say this. I think we understand that there are really colossally stupid people in Washington. Guam may capsize.

STU: (Laughing).

GLENN: Okay?

PAT: Okay, yeah.

GLENN: So there are those people who are just, "Okay, George." Got it? I think there is a number of people on both sides of the aisle, dumb as a box of rocks. No different than the general population. There are dumb people around us. Then beyond that there are those who know exactly what they're doing. Nancy Pelosi is one of them. Don't tell me that she's a genius and she doesn't know. She was the architect of getting this one done!

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Don't tell me that she's that smart and stupid.

PAT: She was the one who with 30,000 people there to oppose this bill and they did it peacefully, by the way. They're gathered outside. She takes a giant stinking gavel and parades her and her fellow

GLENN: Progressives.

PAT: Progressives right through the middle of these people trying to provoke them.

GLENN: That she has said, that she has been one of the leaders saying these people are dangerous

PAT: I'm going to pole vault them.

GLENN: They're dangerous, we'll just climb over their wall, we'll pole vault them. She goes through that. She knows exactly what she's doing.

PAT: Absolutely.

GLENN: Now Tom, let me ask you this: If there are those in Washington that are destroying our economy, destroying our freedoms and they just don't know what they don't know, then you should name the frickin' names so we can get those people out of office. If you are so if you are not dumb as a box of rocks and you're not part of an evil cabal of progressivism but you just don't know, then help us educate those people or get them out. You are so irresponsible that you said you would protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and you're telling me the people who say, "I just don't know if it's in the Constitution, I don't really care about the Constitution. I don't check the Constitution. I didn't read the bill," that's because they don't know? That's criminal incompetence. Criminal incompetence.

STU: And I don't know of anyone who has said anything about how delightful Nancy Pelosi is at brunch. She might be a great lady. The point is not that she's no good but that she's no good for the country.

GLENN: Yeah, I don't really care about

STU: She's hurting the country with her policies.

GLENN: Nobody see, this is what the left wants to do. The left, believe me, someday I think I have probably four books that need to be published and they will be published either upon my death or when I'm just ready to just disappear. One of them is on the media, things I've learned. Another one is on politics and things I've learned. Another one is you want threats? Let me show you the volumes of threats. The left would like to cut people's heads off. This is a favorite one: Rape and molest your children? They will do anything to shut you up. Anything to shut you up. I don't want to shut Nancy Pelosi up. She has a right to say whatever she wants. Live within the Constitution and have an honest debate. That's all I want. That's all I want.

PAT: One of the biggest problems I think we have in this country is that we've allowed the left to reposition what hateful rhetoric is. We are opposed to policies and that's what we talk about every day. Sometimes we do it in a colorful way, but when we're talking about

GLENN: But so do they. So does everyone.

PAT: Of course they do. Of course they do. And when you say that Nancy Pelosi is disregarding the will of the American people, that's not hateful rhetoric. That's fact!

GLENN: When I say that these, that Van Jones is a communist, that's not hateful rhetoric.

PAT: That's fact.

GLENN: Those are his words. When I say Jim Wallis is a Marxist, that's not hateful rhetoric. Those are his words. When I say Andy Stern loves to have the workers of the world unite, was a part of SDS, the Students For Democratic Society, those are not hateful, that's not hateful rhetoric. Those are facts. When I lay out the case on Barack Obama like we did last night on television, that's not hateful. There is not a single judgment of the man. Is he a good man or a bad man. Not once have I judged him as a good man or a bad man. What I'm trying to do is expose who he is. You can expose who I am because I made a decision when I first got back, when I honestly when I damn near lost my soul, came to the end and realized I either have to find a way to hold onto my soul and be happy or I'm going to die. I decided that I would do everything I could do put my life back. Well, I did that in 1999. I did everything I could. Now, I was not a perfect man, nor am I a perfect man today. But I do everything I can to put my life back in order. You want to expose me for who I am? That's okay. We'll have an honest debate. I'll tell you exactly what I think. I'll tell you exactly what I believe. I'll tell you exactly what policies I think should be done, and you can combat that. But that's not what these people want to do. They just want to destroy you. And they do not want their policies, their principles, the things that they believe in exposed. Why does America want transparency? Because anything that is happening behind closed doors we need to know about. We need to know about it. I'll tell you the things that happened behind closed doors with me. I'll tell you those things. I'll tell you that I'm not a perfect person. I've made mistakes in my life. I've already told you all of those things, but I did something about those things, and I changed my life. The things I don't tell you now, I don't tell you for security reasons. It is a bizarre world. It is an upside down, inside out, quantum physics world. But I promise you this: Because of who these people are, they will expose themselves. Now, the question is, we've lived beyond our means far too long. We wanted to take the easy way out far too long, and our country is on the eve of destruction, whether that be from the Republicans or the Democrats that spend us into oblivion, it is the eve of destruction in America. How do we fix it? With the truth. Not with guns. Not with riots. With the truth. You must start telling the truth in your own life to yourself. Stop lying to yourself. Stop lying to your family. Stop lying to others. If you are, stop it. Stop it. The truth will set us free. And the truth look. If you are a God fearing person and you believe it requires you to believe two things, and maybe you don't, but I do. One, I believe in God. Two, I believe rights come from man and this Constitution and the founding of this nation were divinely inspired. These are God's rights and God's freedoms. Now, what we've done with them in the last 200 and some years is on our heads. We have pissed them away. We have treated them like garbage, but in the end and this is why we will be destroyed for it if we don't turn our ways. In the end they belong to him. So if we appreciate those rights, if we do the right thing, we are going to have to pay for a consequence because I'm sorry, not everybody gets a trophy just for participation. We're going to have to pay the consequence for our living and mistreating these rights. But in the end have no fear because nothing will thwart him because these are his rights. This was his Constitution. This is his country for his purposes. Not ours. And nothing, nothing will thwart him in the end. We are quite honestly in many ways pawns in a battle that has been raging since the beginning of man. Take yourself out of the hapless pawn and be part of the solution. And the only way that that happens is if you first tie yourself to him and the only way you can do that is tie yourself to the truth.

'The Handmaid's Tale' got it right, just with the wrong religion

Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images

Just in case The Handmaid's Tale's heavy-handed message wasn't already heavy-handed enough, a recent episode made it clear there's always room for further hysteria. Particularly, in relation to depictions of a “patriarchal society" run by Christian doctrine and determined by men — oh those dastardly men.

RELATED: Christian privilege is the new white privilege

The show appropriates Margaret Atwood of the same name, depicting a totalitarian society led by Christian doctrine in which women's bodies are controlled, and they have no rights. The story sounds familiar, but not in the same way Atwood and the show's creators have so smugly assumed.

Just as tone-deaf as 4th wave feminism itself, and tone-deaf in all the exact same places. Most notably, the show's heavy-handed indignation toward Christianity. Toward the patriarchy. Toward conservatives and traditional values. And just like 4th wave feminism, the show completely overlooks the irony at play. Because there is a part of the world where women and children are being raped and mutilated. In fact, in this very real place, the women or girls are often imprisoned, even executed, for being raped, and they are mutilated in unspeakable ways.

Theirs is a cruel, bloody, colorless life.

There is a place, a very real place, where women are forced to cover their entire bodies with giant tarp-like blankets, which is all the more brutal given the endless heat of this place. There is a place where women literally have one-third of the rights of men, a place where women are legally, socially and culturally worth less than men.

They cannot drive cars. They cannot be outside alone. They cannot divorce, they cannot even choose who they marry and often, they are forcibly married at a young age.

They are raped. A lot. Theirs is a cruel, bloody, colorless life. This is the life of tens, perhaps hundreds of millions of women. And, I'll tell you, their religion isn't Christianity.

Science did it again. It only took 270 million years, but this week, scientists finally solved the mystery that has kept the world up at night. We finally know where octopuses come from: outer space. That explains why they look like the aliens in just about every alien movie ever made.

RELATED: Changes in technology can be cause for concern, but THIS is amazing

It turns out octopuses were aliens that evolved on another planet. Scientists haven't determined which one yet, but they've definitely narrowed it down to one of the planets in one of the galaxies. Hundreds of millions of years ago (give or take a hundred), these evolved octopus aliens arrived on Earth in the form of cryopreserved eggs. Now, this part is just speculation, but it's possible their alien planet was on the verge of destruction, so Mom and Dad Octopus self-sacrificially placed Junior in one of these cryopreserved eggs and blasted him off the planet to save their kind.

This alien-octopus research, co-authored by a group of 33 scientists, was published in the Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology journal. I'm sure you keep that on your nightstand like I do.

Anyway, these scientists say octopuses evolved very rapidly over 270 million years. Which sounds slow, but in evolutionary terms, 270 million years is like light speed. And the only explanation for their breakneck evolution is that they're aliens. The report says, “The genome of the Octopus shows a staggering level of complexity with 33,000 protein-coding genes — more than is present in Homo sapiens."

Lucky for us, they landed in the water. Otherwise, we might be octopus pets.

They mention that the octopus' large brain, sophisticated nervous system, camera-like eyes, flexible bodies and ability to change color and shape all point to its alien nature. Octopuses developed those capabilities rather suddenly in evolution, whereas we're still trying to figure out the TV remote.

These biological enhancements are so far ahead of regular evolution that the octopuses must have either time-traveled from the future, or “more realistically" according to scientists, crash-landed on earth in those cryopreserved egg thingies. The report says the eggs arrived here in “icy bolides." I had to look up what a “bolide" is, and turns out it's a fancy word for a meteor.

So, to recap: a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, an alien race of octopuses packed their sperm-bank samples in some meteors and shot them toward Earth. Lucky for us, they landed in the water. Otherwise, we might be octopus pets.

President Trump's approval rating is rising, and Democrats — hilariously — can't seem to figure out what's going on. A few months ago Democrats enjoyed a sixteen point lead over Republicans, but now — according to CNN's recent national survey — that lead is down to just THREE points. National data from Reuters shows it as being even worse.

The Democratic advantage moving towards the halfway mark into 2018 shows that Republicans are only ONE point behind. The president's public approval rating is rising, and Democrats are nervously looking at each other like… “umm guys, what are we doing wrong here?"

I'm going to give Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi a little hint. We know that the Left has enjoyed a “special relationship" with the media, but they might want to have a sit down with their propaganda machine. The mainstream media is completely out of control, and Americans are sick of it. We're DONE with the media.

RELATED: The mainstream media wants you to believe Trump is waging war on immigrants — here's the truth

Look what has been going on just this week. The president called MS-13 gang members animals, but that's not the story the media jumped on. They thought it was more clickable to say that Trump was calling all immigrants animals instead. In the Middle East, the media rushed to vilify Israel instead of Hamas. They chose to defend a terror organization rather than one of our oldest allies.

Think about that. The media is so anti-Trump that they've chosen a violent street gang AND A GLOBAL TERROR ORGANIZATION as their torch-bearing heroes. Come on, Democrats. Are you seriously baffled why the American people are turning their backs on you?

Still not enough evidence? Here's the New York Times just yesterday. Charles Blow wrote a piece called "A Blue Wave of Moral Restoration" where he tried to make the case that the president and Republicans were the enemy, but — fear not — Democrat morality was here to save the day.

Here are some of these cases Blow tries to make for why Trump is unfit to be President:

No person who treats women the way Trump does and brags on tape about sexually assaulting them should be president.

Ok, fine. You can make that argument if you want to, but why weren't you making this same argument for Bill Clinton? Never mind, I actually know the reason. Because you were too busy trying to bury the Juanita Broaddrick story.

Let's move on:

No person who has demonstrated himself to be a pathological liar should be president.

Do the words, “You can keep your doctor" mean anything to the New York Times or Charles Blow? I might have saved the best for last:

No person enveloped by a cloud of corruption should be president.

I can only think of three words for a response to this: Hillary Frigging Clinton.

Try displaying a little consistency.

If the media really wants Donald Trump gone and the Democrats to take over, they might want to try displaying a little consistency. But hey, maybe that's just too much to ask.

How about starting with not glorifying terrorist organizations and murderous street gangs. Could we at least begin there?

If not… good luck in the midterms.

In the weeks following President Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital, the mainstream media was quick to criticize the president's pro-Israel stance and make dire predictions of violent backlash in the Middle East. Fast forward to this week's opening of the US Embassy in Jerusalem and the simultaneous Palestinian “protests" in Gaza.

RELATED: Just another day in Iran: Parliment chants death to America after Trump pulls out of nuclear deal

Predictably, the mainstream media chastised Israel for what they called “state-sanctioned terrorism" when the IDF stepped in to protect their country from so-called peaceful Palestinian protesters. Hamas leaders later admitted that at least 50 of the 62 Palestinians killed in the clashes were Hamas terrorists.

“In our post-modern media age, there is no truth and nobody even seems to be looking for it …. This is shamefully clear in the media especially this week with their coverage of the conflict between the border of Israel and the Gaza strip," said Glenn on today's show. He added, “The main media narrative this week is about how the IDF is just killing innocent protesters, while Hamas officials have confirmed on TV that 50 of the 62 people killed were working for Hamas."

The mainstream media views the Palestinians as the oppressed people who just want to share the land and peacefully coexist with the people of Israel. “They can't seem to comprehend that in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, only one side is actively trying to destroy the other," surmised Glenn.

Watch the video above to hear Glenn debunk the “peaceful Palestinian protest" fallacy.