Glenn Beck: Who doesn't love a surprise?


WatchGlenn Beckweekdays at 5p & 2a ET on Fox News Channel

I was sitting around over vacation, kind of moping; pondering the former greatness of America and wondering what the heck happened to our country. How did we allow it to get to this point? It's so far beyond left and right, Republican and Democrat.

Then I suddenly remembered something that Nancy Pelosi said and it totally cheered me up:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE NANCY PELOSI, D-CALIF.: But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Surprise!

Now we get to find out what's in this health care bill! Who doesn't like a good surprise or two?

It doesn't take a genius to realize that the reason Nancy Pelosi wouldn't tell anyone what's in the bill, is because she knew if people understood it, they wouldn't want it. If it was so great, she would have gone over every single one of the 2,400 pages on C-SPAN. She wouldn't have rushed it through over the course a weekend. She wouldn't have had to bribe members of her own party. But the bill is not great. It's really, really far from great. So they had to be deceptive.

As Nancy Pelosi promised America with a straight (and kind of stretched face) that we'd love what's in this bill — while refusing to show details. Was I the only one in America who heard the voice of my grandfather from beyond the grave: "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is."

There are news reports now of people actually calling insurance companies and saying, where do we get our free Obamacare? I hate to rain on the free "Obama cash" parade, but there are a couple of problems. As we constantly point out, you'll start paying for this program now, but not get the benefits till 2014.

Surprise!

Most importantly, free health care for all isn't actually free. Someone has to pay for it and I have news for you: It isn't just going to be "the rich."

Surprise!

And it's weird, now that the health care bill has already passed, Paul Volcker has suddenly decided to address the concerns the Tea Party-goers had all along: How do we pay for this? The solution? You guessed it: more taxes.

If you will recall, President Obama promised he wouldn't raise taxes by a single dime on anyone making less than $250,000. I have to remind you because no one else in the media will:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIPS)

THEN-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA: No family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase: Not your income tax; not your payroll tax; not your capital gains taxes; not any of your taxes.

If you make less than $250,000 — less than a quarter of a million dollars a year — then you will not see one dime's worth of tax increase.

Show of hands: How many people make less than a quarter million dollars a year? All right, well, I am talking to you then. You will not see your taxes increase one single dime.

If you have a job, pay taxes and make less than $200,000 a year, you'll get a tax cut.

(END VIDEO CLIPS)

Surprise!

One of the first moves President Obama made when he took office was his solution to fund SCHIP: Raise cigarette taxes. Which, by itself this is a ridiculous idea — you are banking the future of children's health care on the hopes that more people continue to buy and smoke cigarettes? Hey kids, when you grow up please, smoke cigarettes so that your children can have a healthy start to their lives.

That's besides the point. I think there are a lot of people who smoke that make less than $250,000 a year — that's called a tax hike.

He also sought to raise the capital gains tax, which affects every single American who invests — and that would be you if you have a 401(k).

Volcker has now come out and said that we're going to have to raise taxes in order to bring deficits under control. Did we try the not spending money thing and it didn't work out? He said we need to consider a European-style "value added tax" or VAT.

According to Reuters, Volcker said: "The value-added tax 'was not as toxic an idea' as it has been in the past and also said a carbon or other energy-related tax may become necessary... He said getting entitlement costs and the U.S. budget deficit under control may require such moves. 'If at the end of the day we need to raise taxes, we should raise taxes.'"

Surprise!

Oh, thanks Nancy. I needed that pick-me-up.

In a total shocker, the George Soros-funded Center for American Progress is a big fan of this idea. Remember: A carbon tax, but also that special VAT tax — would be added on top of the federal tax, raising the $1 trillion needed to cover the projected shortfall in 2020, which would require a 7 percent tax on everything we consume.

You can't just force 32 million people to get health insurance and then mandate that all preventative care is "free." That does cost something and you'll pay for it. Insurance companies will be forced to give you preventative care for "free," which means they'll have to pass the costs on to consumers anyway — almost like a tax.

Part of the bill that has already passed and supposedly will save us money and have absolutely no waste, is a federal trust fund that will pay for more bicycle paths, playgrounds, jungle gyms, sidewalks and hiking trails. There is also a new board set up that will decide what preventative tests you have and don't have to take. It's called the United States Preventative Services Task Force.

That's weird, I don't remember Nancy Pelosi talking about how the government would be dictating my health care and saddling America with extra taxes for hiking trails. In fact I kind of remember them saying no one would get between me and my doctors.

Surprise!

By the way, even though something is marked health care or peanut brittle, it can still be full of snakes.

People can't be dealing with even more crushing taxes during these economic times. That's probably why a woman named Doris confronted President Obama about the coming tax storm recently:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DORIS: Is it a wise decision to add more taxes to us with the health care? Because we are over-taxed as it is.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Well, let's talk about that, you know, because this is an area where there's been just a whole lot of misinformation. And I'm going to have to work hard over the next several months to clean up a lot of the misapprehensions that people have...

(END VIDEO CLIP)

I'd show you the whole answer, but it was 17 minutes long. I thought Obama was the smartest human ever created. Did he really need to filibuster poor old Doris?

The fact is they lied saying America could afford this bill... that's why

Most Americans were against this because they knew it was reckless. Oh, but Glenn! The CBO said it this bill was just wonderful and that we would actually save money!

Uh-huh.

And Alan Greenspan just came out and said that if the numbers are correct, then everything will be fantastic!

Yes, he did. But he also talked about if the numbers were wrong:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ALAN GREENSPAN, FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE: What happens if we are wrong? In other words, in the case now, where our buffer between our capacity to borrow and our actual debt is narrowing, for the first time, I think, in the American history, there's a question, supposing we are wrong on the cost estimates and, indeed, they are actually much higher than the best estimates can generate. The consequences are very severe.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

"Very severe"?

First of all, weren't you and I mocked and called crazy racists for expressing concern about jamming a massive, multi-trillion dollar entitlement through right now? Greenspan just said it.

Secondly, this is kind of a big "if," don't you think? Heads: America stays the same; tails we all die. I'm not a gambling man, but does anyone really believe the government has any idea what they are talking about with estimates?

Let me give you a couple examples of government estimates as we consider the estimated $1 trillion health care bill:

• Boston's "Big Dig" Highway Project


Estimated preliminary price tag (in 1985): $2.5 billion


Actual cost with interest: $22 billion

• Medicare Part A


Estimated price tag for 1990: $9 billion


Actual cost in 1990: $67 billion

• Medicaid's Special Hospital Subsidy


Estimated cost for 1992: less than $1 billion


Actual cost in 1992: $17 billion

This would be entertaining if it were "The Price Is Right" and the yodeler was going up the mountain. Unfortunately, this isn't "The Price Is Right," this is our country.

What was it Greenspan said?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

GREENSPAN: Supposing we are wrong on the cost estimates and, indeed, they are actually much higher than the best estimates can generate. The consequences are very severe.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Is that like a "broken leg" severe or "we're all going to die" severe? Either way, thanks for the timely advice, Al.

Forget for a minute the mountain of past evidence that proves government can't accurately predict cost estimates, former CBO Director Doug Holtz-Eakin says in a frightening op-ed that this health care bill would certainly "increase the crushing debt," not save us money.

Great. Listen, I can settle this. It requires two things for this not to be really, really severe:

The government has to be right about the cost estimates

The necessary cuts Congress promised to make have to actually happen

Would you bet your life on either of these ever happening? If they don't make the cuts, their figures way wrong. And we've seen the government's track record on cost estimates.

I thought health care was essential to fixing the economy. Why are we now immediately rushing for new taxes? I know: It was that evil George W. Bush. Obama didn't know how bad it was. But didn't he say this?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

OBAMA: One year later, the worst of the storm has passed.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Wait, if we can't fix our economy unless we fix health care and this will save us money and the worst is behind us, why do you still have to have crippling taxes? What about all those savings we will reap from health care? I thought we were actually decreasing the deficit?

America, it's time to draw a line in the sand. How many times will you allow them to lie to you? How many times will you watch them take your money and screw it up? How many times will you believe them that they can "fix" something like Medicare or Medicaid?

We have hard work to do and Republicans and Democrats and independents can do it. But the first thing we have to do is stop believing that there's an easy way out.

It's like we've fallen for the "Nigerian prince" e-mail scam. We sent them $10,000 because they promised we'd get to share a $20 million inheritance with them. And we got burned. But soon another e-mail from the prince came in. We sent another $10,000 and we got burned again and we swear we've learned our lesson. But then we get a third e-mail from another Nigerian prince. But this is a different Nigerian prince!

Stop believing the e-mails from Nigerian princes. They’re not telling the truth.

— WatchGlenn Beckweekdays at 5p & 2a ET on Fox News Channel

CNN reporter tries to 'ambush' GOP candidate Kari Lake, IMMEDIATELY regrets it

Image source: (left) Video screenshot/ (Right) Mario Tama/Getty Images

CNN senior national reporter Kyung Lah thought she'd caught Republican Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake off guard when she asked for an impromptu interview outside an event, but ended up sorely regretting her decision.

Lake, a former Fox news anchor, shook hands with Lah as she approached and immediately pointed out that the CNN reporter wasn't wearing a mask any more, a barbed reference to a contentious interview in October 2021, in which Lah smeared the GOP candidate as a “rising star of the right-wing and proud spreader of lies." Lah asked if Lake had “a minute to chat.”

“I’ll do an interview," Lake answered, "as long as it airs on CNN+. Does that still exist? I didn’t think so, because the people don’t like what you guys are peddling, which is propaganda. Thank you.”

Lake then walked into the event, leaving Lah utterly speechless.

It looks like Lake gained quite a few fans on Twitter:

Kari Lake has been a longtime friend to "The Glenn Beck Program." She joined Glenn last August to tell Glenn why she left the corrupt world of media, what prompted her to enter "the even more corrupt world of politics," and how she plans to make a big difference in her battleground state of Arizona.

Watch the video clip below to catch the conversation. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Hunter's Biden's latest BIZARRE scandal reveals how red-flag laws REALLY work

Photo by Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Even if red-flag laws weren't unconstitutional (which they are), they've never been about your safety. They're about your submission, argued Glenn Beck on the radio program. Think of it this way: If red flag laws became the law of the land, do you think President Joe Biden’s son Hunter would lose his guns or face charges for violating the gun laws we already have?

You may have heard that he once "lost" a gun in a dumpster by a school. But there's a whole lot more to the bizarre tale. Newly revealed texts from Hunter's abandoned laptop detail the strange drama that unfolded when Hallie Biden, Hunter's sister-in-law-turned-lover, threw his handgun into a dumpster near a Delaware school in October 2018. The gun was found and turned in to police, but like so many of the Biden family scandals, the chaos created a sandstorm that conveniently helped cover Hunter's tracks. Only tidbits of information have emerged, the most significant of which is that the gun in question was purchased by Hunter illegally and, of course, no charges were filed as a result.

Glenn broke down the details of the most recently revealed Hunter Biden scandal, noting in particular that no charges or arrests were ever made as a result.

"If you voted for Joe Biden and you believe in all of these red-flag laws, then why isn't Hunter Biden in jail today?" Glenn asked.

"You and I both know that the ramifications of Hunter Biden's activities and his tragic saga go well beyond Hunter Biden, because they are teaching people a lesson. We are moving towards a society that has a ruling class that lives above their own edicts. They tell us they know better. They tell us that our neighbors and even some of us are dangerous, while ignoring the dangers in their own lives or in their own families ... We saw it during COVID-19 and we will see it again with gun regulations, 'The rules are for thee and not for me.' This is why Americans cannot give an inch, not one inch of our liberty away on the grounds of the government's good faith. They have no good faith left. They have violated every single principle of liberty and they've done it in a name of they know better," he said.

"Don't be fooled," Glenn added. "Just as we saw during COVID-19, just as we saw with the Patriot Act that is now being horribly abused by the people in power that swore they'd never abuse it, red-flags are not about your safety. Period. They are about your submission."

Watch the video clip below to catch the conversation. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Thanks to a recent report from the Federalist, we now know of an ‘insidious’ White House plan to significantly alter commercial sales of ammunition. Not only would this plot skyrocket the price of ammunition for everyday consumers, but it could create a national security risk by limiting one factory’s ability to produce for the military under war-time demand as well.

Larry Keane, from the National Shooting Sports Foundation, joined "The Glenn Beck Program" to detail this White House move, and he explained how he knows the government is lying about it, too.

Watch the video clip below to catch the conversation. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

2021 was a turning point for public education in America. Remote learning revealed to parents what public schools were force-feeding their kids — everything from critical race theory to the existence of infinite genders — while performance in subjects like math and reading fell across the board.

Now, school boards and teachers' unions are facing a tidal wave of parents who want to take the reins back. But school wasn’t always like this. Glenn Beck takes us back to a time before the Department of Education and asks the question: “Are our schools getting better or worse?”

American Federation for Children senior fellow Corey DeAngelis joins to expose who’s actually benefitting from our public school system — and it’s not our kids. And former Secretary of Education under President Trump Betsy DeVos explains why it’s time to abolish the department she once headed, what stopped her from doing so, and how parents can make a big difference.

Watch the full episode of "Glenn TV" below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.