Glenn Beck: Illegal Immigrants rally

GLENN: What's happening in Arizona is amazing to me because you had a riot in Arizona. In fact, play just some of the audio, please, from the sound. We'll show you the pictures tonight.

PAT: Might want to start after they say F'ing racist. Start just

GLENN: Start that, yeah. All right, go ahead, Sarah. Play the this is just the sound of what was happening in Arizona over the weekend.

(Audio clip plays)

PAT: This is where some of the anti illegal immigration law protestors

GLENN: Yes.

PAT: Are throwing bottles at the police because they are trying to escort some white guy who is there in support of the law out so he wouldn't be, you know, beaten or killed. They were afraid for his safety and they are trying to sort him out and so the protestors are throwing rocks and bottles at the police officers.

GLENN: Now, this sounds to me an awful lot like a tea party.

PAT: Oh, because of the

GLENN: Oh, no, it doesn't.

PAT: The horrible violence?

GLENN: The only time that we have had violence in this country so far has been from the left.

PAT: That's it. And you are not seeing this video over and over.

GLENN: Over and over again.

PAT: Ms. NBC on this? NBC, CBS, ABC?

GLENN: Anybody? Quite honestly where is Fox today on this? We have this audio because I asked for it yesterday to be fed to me from Phoenix. So where is this video? You want to talk about violence, here is the violence. You want to talk about protestors engaging in hate, here it is. You know, they always say that the tea parties, you know, they hate the government. We're never throwing bottles at police officers. Never, not once. Never, not once. I don't know a single tea party member that doesn't like the police, that doesn't trust the police. I don't know a single person that has a problem with the Secret Service. I don't know a single person that has a problem with the FBI. I do know people who have a problem with the people running the FBI. I know there are people that have problems with the head of the Department of Justice because it's becoming the department of social justice. I do know people that have a problem with the people making decisions in New York. I don't know anybody that has a problem with the border patrol. I do know people who have problems with the people running the border patrol. I've never thrown anything at a police officer, nor would I even think about it. Nor would I even think about it.

Play the audio again from Phoenix, Arizona. You'll see the video tonight. Probably for the first time.

(Audio clip plays)

GLENN: Now, who is the racist? This guy who is standing up in favor who has to be escorted out by police, or those who are throwing things at him and the police. Calling him a racist. For what? For standing up for the rule of law? Do you see what's happening? And by the way, Al Sharpton is now going down to Phoenix, Arizona. Al Sharpton.

PAT: That won't stir things up at all.

GLENN: No, it won't stir it up at all.

PAT: That won't stir it up at all.

GLENN: No, no. They talk about I have to reduce my rhetoric because tensions are high, and I'm stirring things up. But Al Sharpton is now going to Phoenix, Arizona. I warn you, they are doing everything they can to make it seem as though this is the civil rights movement all over again. Everything is a civil right. There are no responsibilities in this country anymore. There's not a responsibility to work, there's not a responsibility to pay your taxes if you are the right person, there's not a responsibility to do the right thing if you're too big to fail, there's not a responsibility to come here legally, if you're the right minority. There's not a there's not equal justice. The tea party needs to change their tune. It's not about high taxes. It's not just about unsustainable spending. It is about equal justice. Equal justice. Not social or economic or ecological justice. Equal. Because that's what's happening to us. You want to talk about high taxes, why are the high taxes there? It's not because of the unsustainable spending. Why is the unsustainable spending there? The unsustainable spending is there to spread the wealth, to take it from the wealthy and give it to the poor. It is called social and economic justice. If you correct social, economic and ecological justice and say those three terms as defined by the leaders in Washington are nonsense and they go against our Constitution, if you correct those three things, everything else will correct itself. Faith has become social justice. The government will make amends. The government will equalize your hardship. Only Jesus can do that. Hope, hope has been replaced by regulation. They will regulate fairness. They will regulate your way into hope. Not a problem, don't worry. You don't want another, you don't want another failure? Let me tell you the story about economic failure. You see, the United States had just come out of a really bad failure, and the banks had started to fail. And the United States government actually failed. The United States government was on the gold standard. It was in the 1890s. We were on the gold standard. We didn't have enough gold to be able to keep the doors open and so we had to borrow money. We had to borrow gold from J.P. Morgan. Well, people didn't like that. People didn't like that. Didn't like being beholden to somebody like J.P. Morgan. And we had just come out of a bad depression in early 1890s. And then there was another one in, like, 1908. Well, it took a while, and it took a fearless leader like Woodrow Wilson to be able to say we're going to stop all of these swings; it's just too much. We should have some stability here. We've got to be able to make sure that these crashes never happen again. And so we invented the Federal Reserve to make sure that there were no more crashes. There was a crash in 1920. There was a crash in 1929. There was just a crash and there's another crash coming. Regulation doesn't work. Crashes, failures are a part of life. We have to just tell people that there are going to be crashes. You should save for a rainy day because we don't all live in San Diego. And even people who live in San Diego will tell you sometimes it rains in San Diego; you should have an umbrella. Don't buy a convertible, move to San Diego and then rip the soft top off because occasionally you are going to need the soft top. Now what they are trying to do is first they gave us the Federal Reserve. But that's not enough. Now they need regulation for the entire globe. It is the cornerstone of the new world order. All you need is the finances. Once you have a global tax where is that global tax going? Where is all that money going? Who's going to oversee that money? How are you going to spend it? How are you going to make sure it's fair? Now there's a new global tax. Well, once you have a global tax, you certainly need somebody to run it. And once you have a little global tax, surely you are going to need a little more global tax. Surely once you crack that door open, it's not a problem. Just a little global regulation. Where are the people that understand the new world order? Where are the people that understand what was conspiracy theory is quickly becoming conspiracy fact? There is a global order being assembled. The first step to that is taxes and regulation done by people that you don't they don't answer to you. You think it's bad now in Washington? You've got an election coming up in November. You put a global regulation and global tax; who do you vote out? Who answers to you? Who are we sending this money to? How do we get them out? How do we know if they're corrupt? Who are they? And yet the Republicans and the Democrats are just willing to do it because there's a bad guy, a boogeyman. We got to get that boogeyman. And global framework will be the only way to do it. Let's put things in order. Let's put things in order. Al Sharpton is going down. Al Sharpton is going down to make sure that you understand. And mark my words; it is coming. That what's happening in Arizona, Jim Crow laws. What's happening in Arizona is exactly what happened in the 1960s, in the civil rights movement. And I'll show you the only reason why it's happening, next.

Avenatti arrested: The lawyer now needs a lawyer

David McNew/Getty Images

At this point, I think there are about - oh - four thousand potential Democrats that may try and run for president in 2020. But we can probably take one off the list. "The creepy porn lawyer", also known by some as Michael Avenatti, was arrested yesterday afternoon in Los Angeles. And the reason why he was arrested kind of makes you think there's some kind of invisible force out there that's making sure either irony or maybe even karma is receiving it's daily offering. Michael Avenatti was just arrested for… Domestic Violence.

The alleged victim filed the complaint on Wednesday, but the incidents began on Tuesday. The woman involved is said to have bruising and swelling on her face and was kicked out of Avenatti's Los Angeles area apartment. Avenatti could be heard screaming, "This is BS, this is effing BS! She hit me first!"

RELATED: THIS spotlight hound masquerading as an attorney just got laughed out of court

Yeah, I don't think the whole "she hit me first" line is going to be a good strategy to use in court. He might want to revise that… I'm just saying.

You know, I wonder if the media - specifically CNN and MSNBC - are going to be doing any mea culpa's over the next 12 to 24 hours? They basically became Avenatti's PR wing over the past 8 months. From March to May, the two networks had Avenatti on the air over 100 times. He gave 147 interviews on both cable and network TV. MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell actually said quote, "Michael Avenatti is becoming my co-host. I've got to say."

And this was actually before he dragged Julie Swetnick into the limelight to attack Kavanaugh. You know I wonder, will this teach networks like CNN and MSNBC to maybe take a step back on over hyping and exposing every crazy, and even salacious, person or claim that comes out simply because it may be anti-Trump or GOP? Could this be a learning moment? Yeah… probably not, but one can dream.

And speaking of Kavanaugh, I've got to read this twitter exchange between one user and Avenatti on October 5th that said:

Brett Kavanaugh will be confirmed, and it's Michael Avenatti's fault. Seriously.

And then Avenatti replied:

You are right. I should have turned my back on my client. Told her to "shut up" and stay quiet because people like you apparently believe assault victims are to blame. This line of thinking is disgusting and offensive to all survivors.

Well that was then and this is today. Here is Avenatti's statement last night.


Michael Avenatti: 'I Have Never Struck A Woman' | NBC News youtu.be

Umm, in the court of Avenatti, #metoo and public opinion now a days - by the standard that he helped create - is this statement not "disgusting and offensive to all survivors" as he tweeted back in October? Is he not immediately guilty as accused? I wonder if all the men and women screaming at Kavanaugh and GOP Senators in elevators can now see the pandora's box that they wanted opened.

The answer is no… he's NOT guilty as accused. Avenatti is innocent of this crime… UNTIL he's found guilty. We have to presume he's innocent until all evidence comes out proving he's not. That's how this works. Let's lead by example and do something radical here… let's actually wait for all the information and evidence to come out before we convict someone of a crime.

And that right there is the real irony here. Avenatti will get the due process that he deserves, but I doubt neither he - nor anyone screaming for Kavanaugh's head - will realize what happened.

It's been a busy week for former First Ladies, and for current First Lady Melania Trump. It has also been busy for one woman who, twenty-odd years ago, while working at the White House for then-President at the age of 21, shot to fame in the most embarrassing way possible.

Monica Lewinsky has released "The Clinton Affair," a docuseries that premieres this weekend on A&E;, a six-part series examining those cringe-inducing days and months surrounding her affair with Bill Clinton.

RELATED: The #MeToo movement proves to be too strong for the Clinton apologists

In an article for Vanity Fair early this year, she wrote:

Some closest to me asked why would I want to revisit the most painful and traumatic parts of my life — again. Publicly. On-camera. With no control of how it would be used. A bit of a head-scratcher, as my brother is fond of saying. Do I wish I could erase my years in D.C. from memory, 'Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind' style? Well, is the sky blue? But I can't. And in order to move forward in the life I have, I must take risks — both professional and emotional…. An important part of moving forward is excavating, often painfully, what has gone before. When politicians are asked uncomfortable questions, they often duck and dodge by saying, 'That's old news. It's from the past.' Yes. That's exactly where we need to start to heal — with the past. But it's not easy.

She added:

Filming the documentary forced me to acknowledge to myself past behavior that I still regret and feel ashamed of," she explained. "There were many, many moments when I questioned not just the decision to participate, but my sanity itself. Despite all the ways I tried to protect my mental health, it was still challenging. During one therapy session, I told my therapist I was feeling especially depressed. She suggested that sometimes what we experience as depression is actually grief… Yes, it was grief. The process of this docuseries led me to new rooms of shame that I still needed to explore.

Meanwhile, Bill Clinton—a man who has been accused of all sorts of terrible things, a close friend of Harvey Weinstein—recently admitted that he didn't feel the need to apologize to Lewinsky. Lewinsky disagrees.

I'm less disappointed by him, and more disappointed for him. He would be a better man for it… and we, in turn, a better society.

The #MeToo movement has been a wrecking ball to so many men, yet Bill Clinton, perhaps the most prolific of them all, has escaped unscathed.

One man undoes shocking climate change study because... math

Pierre Leverrier/Unsplash

The left cries "science" about anything they want to consider a settled matter. Those who disagree with the left's climate change narrative question this "science." So, the climate change crowd are branded hysterical tree-huggers, and the anti-climate change crowd are naïve hicks.

The truth about climate change, like the truth when it comes to many issues, probably falls somewhere between the two extremes. But when it comes to climate change, it's hard to have a conversation about the "science" when the scientists running the show are already convinced they're absolutely correct and they have the unquestioning major media to back them up.

RELATED: 🤣😂🤣: WaPo claims climate change is the real reason for migrant invasion

Just two weeks ago, a study published in the scientific journal Nature claimed that the oceans are warming much faster than anyone previously thought. Cue the panic and blame the President! It was a high-profile story splashed across major media outlets who were eager to promote more science that confirms one of the left's fundamental doctrines.

The study claimed ocean temperatures have risen around 60% higher than the estimate by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. But Nicholas Lewis, a British mathematician and climate-change critic quickly found a "major problem" with the study's conclusion.

Then yesterday, the two scientists who wrote the study admitted Lewis is right about the mistakes they made in their calculations. Now they say oceans aren't actually warming as fast as they reported. Climate scientist Ralph Keeling, who co-authored the report, says they miscalculated their margin of error – which is 10 to 70% – much larger than they originally thought.

Now they say oceans aren't actually warming as fast as they reported.

A 10 to 70 percent margin of error? I thought this climate change science was absolute. Imagine if your job had a margin of error that generous.

Keeling said:

Our error margins are too big now to really weigh in on the precise amount of warming that's going on in the ocean. We really muffed the error margins.

The whole incident is being laughed off as a minor error. But if it wasn't for some British dude poring over this research in his basement and willing to cry foul, this latest climate change "science" would continue to be broadcast as absolute truth. Just like it always is.

UPDATE: Here's how the discussion went on radio. Watch the video below.


Ocean Warming Research “Mistake" youtu.be


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, from California, is doing everything she can to make sure she is re-elected in January to her spot as House Speaker.

Reasons Nancy Pelosi could give: Because she led the Democratic caucus for 16 years, and under her the House shifted hands. In fact, she was House Speaker for four years under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

RELATED: Sorry Nancy Pelosi, Apple's record-shattering buyback program is proof positive tax breaks work

Reason she actually gave: Because she's a woman.

During an interview on CBS Sunday, Pelosi said:

You cannot have the four leaders of Congress [and] the president of the United States, these five people, and not have the voice of women. Especially since women were the majority of the voters, the workers in campaigns, and now part of this glorious victory.

The pink wave, they're calling it. A rise in women politicians, supposedly in reaction to Donald Trump.

Here's the general argument, as described by Politico:

Push her out, and men may take over the party at a time when more than 100 women are heading to Capitol Hill and after female voters have been thoroughly alienated by President Donald Trump. Embrace her, and she'll prioritize legislation empowering women on issues ranging from equal pay to anti-harassment legislation.

Of course, she has a reason to use identity politics instead of merit: There's a concerted effort to have her un-seated.

At least nine representatives have come out and said that Pelosi will be out.

At least nine representatives have come out and said that Pelosi will be out. Filemon Vela said:

I am 100% confident we can forge new leadership.

Led by, Rep. Ed Perlmutter (D-CO), these are the representatives who have openly called for Pelosi's outing: Reps. Bill Foster (D-IL), Seth Moulton (DMA), Kathleen Rice (D-NY), Tim Ryan (D-OH), Kurt Schrader (D-OR), Conor Lamb (D-PA), and Filemon Vela (D-TX). Campaign staff for incoming Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA) and Jason Crow (D-CO) have said they won't vote for Pelosi.

If they have a single ounce of dignity left, they won't, at least not just because she is a woman.