Congressman Weiner attacks Glenn...

GLENN: I just want to — because we just did the commercial for Goldline, I just got this in my e mail. This is from — or no, I did do — did I do Lifelock?

STU: Lifelock, yeah.

PAT: You did Lifelock, but I love Goldline as well. Are you doing Goldline now?

GLENN: I did a commercial earlier this morning. All right, Ben Smith has an article out now. Goldline girds for Weiner assault. Now, that's just —

PAT: What do you mean Weiner assault?

GLENN: That's just one of the best headlines of all time. Forget Goldman. Listen to this. Forget Goldman. New York representative Anthony Weiner.

PAT: I take that seriously. It's a Weiner assault.

GLENN: It's a Weiner assault.

PAT: (Laughing).

GLENN: Forget Goldline. Weiner is shooting a bit lower in the finance food chain going after gold dealers. His latest target, Goldline, which has made its name profiling with the help of conservative talkers, made its money off of fees for buying and selling gold against public anxiety. A representative of the company has just circulated this e mail this afternoon. Tomorrow, May 18th, Congressman Weiner will either be having a press conference and sending out press releases that will involve Goldline International and Glenn Beck. Congressman Weiner will also be going after other conservative supporters that endorse Goldline. We are not sure exactly what Weiner will be saying, but we know that it will not be favorable to either Goldline or the conservative personalities that support Goldline.

STU: You think?

PAT: What a Weiner.

GLENN: This is incredible. This is incredible. This is again another arm of this administration coming out to try to shut me down. This is absolutely incredible. Is there anybody that is going to say anything in the press at any time if you stand up against this White House? They have three, count them, three advisors of this president that have launched official campaigns boycotting my sponsors! Any sponsor that stays with me, now they are targeting through — you want to talk about the McCarthy era! Look at what this country is becoming! Is there anyone, anyone that has the courage to stand up against these monsters? Look at what they are doing! It's incredible! Incredible.

PAT: Kind of took the edge off the Weiner thing.

GLENN: No, you can go back to it.

STU: There's still a Weiner assault going on. Don't worry.

PAT: (Laughing). You know, I would, I would have to say —

GLENN: Don't you wish his first name wasn't Anthony but Richard so it would be Dick Weiner?

STU: This is not —

PAT: This is not —

STU: Not really where we needed to go on the program.

GLENN: Come on.

STU: It's a happy place to go.

GLENN: Oh, seriously, Mr. Representative Weiner. We're going to — no, we're going to take this.

STU: Is he —

GLENN: We believe that you are really operating in the best interest of the American people.

STU: Of course. That's all he's thinking about!

PAT: Of course he is.

STU: Hasn't even considered that it might shut up conservative voices!

GLENN: No one, no one — everybody wants to call me Joe McCarthy. I'm a private citizen! I do not have the power of the state behind me. I'm a private citizen. Now the congress is launching an investigation or a smear campaign after they can't take my sponsors out through White House sponsored, White House — I'm telling you, the White — are you really telling me that the, one of the political and spiritual advisors for Barack Obama did not tell Barack Obama that he was leading a campaign against me with Christians? Why? For social justice. Why is he doing it for social justice? I'll tell you. Tonight I'm spending a whole hour on it. Because the White House has now taken their religious, what do you call that thing, the —

PAT: Faith based initiative.

GLENN: Faith based initiative that everybody had a problem with under George W. Bush. And he has merged it with the EPA. And if your church gets on board and helps sell cap and trade and global warming, it will be easier for your church to get loans. What? What? All in the name of social, economic, and environmental justice. That's why they targeted me and tried to get the Christian community and the faith based community to turn on me, to discredit me. Because I was ahead of the curve and told you, look out; they are coming for your church. They are doing it. We announced it yesterday after the White House announced it. Are you telling me that Jim Wallis, there's no coordination with his campaign against me and the White House? Are you really expecting me to believe that Van Jones' organizations is completely — there's nobody in the White House that knows his organization led a boycott against me for seven straight months? Are you telling me that Andy Stern's SEIU is running a campaign against me but no one at the White House knows that SEIU is doing that? No one. There's no coordination there? And now we have Weiner coming out for a Weiner assault on my advertisers and me?

STU: Can't help it.

GLENN: Unbelievable.

STU: I really thought I was going to get through that one.

GLENN: This is unbelievable.

STU: Glenn, all you have is you have three administration officials leading boycotts and a liberal congressman now doing a boycott on a specific sponsor, but they have —

GLENN: No, no. No, no. Not a boycott.

STU: Right. Targeting you with the law, sorry.

GLENN: Now they are — the weight of the congress Joe McCarthy is coming after.

STU: But what I'm saying is you have that evidence on your side, sure, but on their side they have — they just passed that freedom of the press thing. So I mean, they are not targeting the press. They just passed freedom of the press!

PAT: Sure, sure.

STU: That sounds awesome.

PAT: You've got to wonder, too, when they do this, when they go on this witch hunt, will they also try to shut down Newsweek, L.A. Times, Denver Post, New York Times, CNBC, the Christian Science Monitor, will it shut all those organizations down as well because they advertise in those.

GLENN: I'm really interested to see how I'm bilking, how I'm bilking people. I'm really interested to see because I personally — because this is what they're saying, that I'm playing on fear and trying to get people to buy. I personally, personally have more than 10% of my savings in gold.

STU: Well, to your benefit. The gold — since you started talking about gold, it's up over 50%. I've never seen anyone get bilked out of a 50% — your getting bilked by getting 50% gain? That one's a new one.

GLENN: I have no idea. I have no idea. It is fascinating to me. If my people that do financial advising — because I'm worth — you don't listen to me for financial advice and that's why I've said don't — I buy it not as an investment. I buy it as insurance policy. If my people, my advisors would allow me to buy 50%, I'd have 50% of my savings in gold. But they all say that's nuts. 10%, no more than 10%, no more than 10%. I think I have 15? 15, maybe 20% of mine in gold. From Goldline. Now, you tell me. If I'm such a scam artist, why would I be scamming myself?

PAT: Oh, you are purposely crashing the dollar.

GLENN: That is what it is. Oh, I'm good, aren't I?

PAT: Yes, you are. You crash the U.S. dollar and that raises the price of gold.

GLENN: There's somebody that actually said that.

PAT: That's pathetic.

GLENN: They tried to make the case that I am purposely trying to craft — me? I have more power than the Fed and the treasury and this president?

STU: (Laughing).

GLENN: You've got to be kidding me. I think you guys got that one on your own.

STU: I mean, the bottom line is it's clear that they are targeting the program but, you know, — and this line of thought —

GLENN: The question is —

STU: But I mean, you've got to fight back against it. That's —

GLENN: I know that, and look. I'll tell ya that the sponsors that we have, they know. They know. A lot of the sponsors that we have, you know, they are just like, "Hey, this is the most effective show on radio or on television. I'm not going anywhere." But they know. They know exactly what we're dealing with. My question for you is, A, when is somebody else in the press going to stand up because they are going to eat you next, gang. If you ever step out of line, they will eat you. And two, when is the American people going to stand up?

Science did it again. It only took 270 million years, but this week, scientists finally solved the mystery that has kept the world up at night. We finally know where octopuses come from: outer space. That explains why they look like the aliens in just about every alien movie ever made.

RELATED: Changes in technology can be cause for concern, but THIS is amazing

It turns out octopuses were aliens that evolved on another planet. Scientists haven't determined which one yet, but they've definitely narrowed it down to one of the planets in one of the galaxies. Hundreds of millions of years ago (give or take a hundred), these evolved octopus aliens arrived on Earth in the form of cryopreserved eggs. Now, this part is just speculation, but it's possible their alien planet was on the verge of destruction, so Mom and Dad Octopus self-sacrificially placed Junior in one of these cryopreserved eggs and blasted him off the planet to save their kind.

This alien-octopus research, co-authored by a group of 33 scientists, was published in the Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology journal. I'm sure you keep that on your nightstand like I do.

Anyway, these scientists say octopuses evolved very rapidly over 270 million years. Which sounds slow, but in evolutionary terms, 270 million years is like light speed. And the only explanation for their breakneck evolution is that they're aliens. The report says, “The genome of the Octopus shows a staggering level of complexity with 33,000 protein-coding genes — more than is present in Homo sapiens."

Lucky for us, they landed in the water. Otherwise, we might be octopus pets.

They mention that the octopus' large brain, sophisticated nervous system, camera-like eyes, flexible bodies and ability to change color and shape all point to its alien nature. Octopuses developed those capabilities rather suddenly in evolution, whereas we're still trying to figure out the TV remote.

These biological enhancements are so far ahead of regular evolution that the octopuses must have either time-traveled from the future, or “more realistically" according to scientists, crash-landed on earth in those cryopreserved egg thingies. The report says the eggs arrived here in “icy bolides." I had to look up what a “bolide" is, and turns out it's a fancy word for a meteor.

So, to recap: a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, an alien race of octopuses packed their sperm-bank samples in some meteors and shot them toward Earth. Lucky for us, they landed in the water. Otherwise, we might be octopus pets.

President Trump's approval rating is rising, and Democrats — hilariously — can't seem to figure out what's going on. A few months ago Democrats enjoyed a sixteen point lead over Republicans, but now — according to CNN's recent national survey — that lead is down to just THREE points. National data from Reuters shows it as being even worse.

The Democratic advantage moving towards the halfway mark into 2018 shows that Republicans are only ONE point behind. The president's public approval rating is rising, and Democrats are nervously looking at each other like… “umm guys, what are we doing wrong here?"

I'm going to give Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi a little hint. We know that the Left has enjoyed a “special relationship" with the media, but they might want to have a sit down with their propaganda machine. The mainstream media is completely out of control, and Americans are sick of it. We're DONE with the media.

RELATED: The mainstream media wants you to believe Trump is waging war on immigrants — here's the truth

Look what has been going on just this week. The president called MS-13 gang members animals, but that's not the story the media jumped on. They thought it was more clickable to say that Trump was calling all immigrants animals instead. In the Middle East, the media rushed to vilify Israel instead of Hamas. They chose to defend a terror organization rather than one of our oldest allies.

Think about that. The media is so anti-Trump that they've chosen a violent street gang AND A GLOBAL TERROR ORGANIZATION as their torch-bearing heroes. Come on, Democrats. Are you seriously baffled why the American people are turning their backs on you?

Still not enough evidence? Here's the New York Times just yesterday. Charles Blow wrote a piece called "A Blue Wave of Moral Restoration" where he tried to make the case that the president and Republicans were the enemy, but — fear not — Democrat morality was here to save the day.

Here are some of these cases Blow tries to make for why Trump is unfit to be President:

No person who treats women the way Trump does and brags on tape about sexually assaulting them should be president.

Ok, fine. You can make that argument if you want to, but why weren't you making this same argument for Bill Clinton? Never mind, I actually know the reason. Because you were too busy trying to bury the Juanita Broaddrick story.

Let's move on:

No person who has demonstrated himself to be a pathological liar should be president.

Do the words, “You can keep your doctor" mean anything to the New York Times or Charles Blow? I might have saved the best for last:

No person enveloped by a cloud of corruption should be president.

I can only think of three words for a response to this: Hillary Frigging Clinton.

Try displaying a little consistency.

If the media really wants Donald Trump gone and the Democrats to take over, they might want to try displaying a little consistency. But hey, maybe that's just too much to ask.

How about starting with not glorifying terrorist organizations and murderous street gangs. Could we at least begin there?

If not… good luck in the midterms.

In the weeks following President Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital, the mainstream media was quick to criticize the president's pro-Israel stance and make dire predictions of violent backlash in the Middle East. Fast forward to this week's opening of the US Embassy in Jerusalem and the simultaneous Palestinian “protests" in Gaza.

RELATED: Just another day in Iran: Parliment chants death to America after Trump pulls out of nuclear deal

Predictably, the mainstream media chastised Israel for what they called “state-sanctioned terrorism" when the IDF stepped in to protect their country from so-called peaceful Palestinian protesters. Hamas leaders later admitted that at least 50 of the 62 Palestinians killed in the clashes were Hamas terrorists.

“In our post-modern media age, there is no truth and nobody even seems to be looking for it …. This is shamefully clear in the media especially this week with their coverage of the conflict between the border of Israel and the Gaza strip," said Glenn on today's show. He added, “The main media narrative this week is about how the IDF is just killing innocent protesters, while Hamas officials have confirmed on TV that 50 of the 62 people killed were working for Hamas."

The mainstream media views the Palestinians as the oppressed people who just want to share the land and peacefully coexist with the people of Israel. “They can't seem to comprehend that in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, only one side is actively trying to destroy the other," surmised Glenn.

Watch the video above to hear Glenn debunk the “peaceful Palestinian protest" fallacy.

Here are a few headlines regarding the protests in Israel: 'Global protests grow after Israeli killing of Palestinian demonstrators,' the Guardian. 'Israel kills dozens at Gaza Border,' the New York Times. 'Palestinians mourn dead in Gaza as protests continue,' CNN. 'Over 50 Palestinians in massive protest are killed by Israeli military, bloodiest day in Gaza since 2014 war,' ABC News. 'Gaza begins to bury its dead after deadliest day in years,' BBC.

RELATED: Here's why Israel used lethal force during mass protests in Gaza yesterday

In each, the spoken or unspoken subject of the sentence and villain of the story is Israel. Innocent Palestinians murdered by the cruel Israelis. This is the narrative that the mainstream media has promulgated. Few have mentioned that the majority of the “protestors" that died were members of Hamas, the militant (and highly anti-Semetic) Sunni-Islamist organization that has been labeled a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department.

A senior Hamas official told reporters that 50 of the 59 people killed in Monday's protests were members of Hamas, and the remainder were “from the people." So…they were all Hamas.

As usual, mention of such membership has been left out of the mainstream media's anti-Israel, pro-Islam narrative.

As usual, mention of such membership has been left out of the mainstream media's anti-Israel, pro-Islam narrative. Maybe they think of Palestinians as underdogs and they love a good scrap. Well, they aren't underdogs. But their outburst have been glorified for so long that it's near impossible to disagree with that narrative.