Glenn Beck: McChrystal vs. Obama


The Overton Window, a thriller by Glenn Beck

GLENN: So General McChrystal did an interview with Rolling Stone magazine. The article is Runaway General. What was he thinking?

PAT: Pretty interesting. Looks like he voted for Obama and now maybe having second thoughts, maybe he was surprised by his management style or the way in which he was going to conduct the war? I mean, I don't know how you could be if you are an intelligent guy, and obviously McChrystal is, but interesting article.

GLENN: Okay. So here's what I think happened. I could be wrong on this, most likely am. McChrystal is not a dumb guy. You don't become a three star if you don't know where the land mines are. I mean, how did you become a three star without stepping on land mines? Because you're smart. So the — let's just play this out with me for a second. (Phone ringing). "General McChrystal's office." "Yeah, man, this is Rolling Stone magazine and, like, dude, we'd like to do, like, an interview with, like, the guy who heads up all the baby killers." "Just a minute, I'll put you right through." (Phone ringing). "Yes?" "General McChrystal?" "Yes." "Some dope smoking hippie is on the phone, wants to do an interview. "Oh, is it Rolling Stone?" "Yes." "They hate the military. Put them right through." How did that happen? How did that happen? Now, is a guy who is a three star actually do the interview and say, "Now, listen, I'm going to say a few things." "Yeah, I know, man. That's why I wanted to talk to you." "Yeah, I'm going to say a few things and I can trust you to keep it off record, right?" "Sure, dude. You got some Doritos?" There's no way that McChrystal didn't know that he was walking into hostile territory. He knew he was walking into a minefield. Now, the question is why did he step on the land mines? I contend, I contend because, A, he really feels this way about Barack Obama, and I want you to know in no uncertain terms I think it is wrong what the general did. If you want to speak out against the commander in chief, you resign and then you say these things. If you disagree with the president, you should resign or keep your mouth shut. I think that he's sending a message. I think he's sending a message to the troops and I think he's sending a message to the administration: You're a clown; military doesn't buy into your leadership; you are the commander in chief. And this is where I have a problem with it. You are the commander in chief. That doesn't mean we like you. That doesn't mean we buy into you, but you are the commander in chief, and the U.S. military is bound by oath to protect and defend the Constitution, and I believe they will do that, and the commander in chief is in charge of military by the Constitution. But I think these guys have had enough, you know. When you look at what this president has done to the military, especially those in Afghanistan, how do you take him seriously? How do you think he's on your side? I mean, there's one thing to say I disagree with his policies. It's another to say, you know, I question whether he is — I mean, is he aware that we can get killed? Is it just me? I mean, if I'm the general over in Afghanistan, I'm thinking to myself, how long did it take you? How long did it take the commander in chief to make a decision? We're over here risking our lives and what are you doing exactly? You are playing golf and you couldn't get a decision for how long? Six months? How is that working out for you? Because it's not working out for us. I think he was sending a message. Now, he's coming back and he's probably going to get fired, and he probably should. With that being said, I don't like the idea of this commander in chief appointing new generals. I mean, I don't trust this guy at all. I mean, who is he going to put in there?

STU: That's probably why he kind of came out with a strong apology there

GLENN: No, I don't think he — he didn't apologize. He didn't retract it.

STU: He said here's the quote. Throughout my career I have lived by the principles of personal honor and professional integrity. What is reflected in article falls short of that standard. I have enormous respect and admiration for President Obama and his national security team.

PAT: When you read the article, I think you'll realize that's not exactly true.

STU: But what I'm saying

GLENN: Here is the best —

STU: At least he is trying to hold his gig, right?

PAT: Probably.

GLENN: Maybe.

PAT: I don't know.

STU: He thinks it's important to stay there.

GLENN: He's not a dummy.

STU: No, I know.

GLENN: Listen. Here's the next, here's the next line in the statement: Throughout my career I have lived by the principles of honor and professional integrity. What is reflected in this article falls far short of that standard. That's true. And this is why we like our military because they are honorable, and George Washington would have never, would have never put up with this, never put up with that. In fact, he didn't, did he?

PAT: No.

GLENN: I mean, that was —

PAT: No.

GLENN: That was the problem with Arnold, Benedict Arnold.

PAT: Yeah. He was not for giving for people who dishonored their post or

GLENN: Yep.

PAT: I mean, there were hangings involved.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: You didn't mess around.

GLENN: I don't think we need to go to hangings

PAT: Well —

GLENN: It shouldn't be tolerated.

PAT: Probably not.

GLENN: It shouldn't be tolerated.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: I have enormous respect and admiration for the president and his national security team. I can't make that one work with what I've read in the article. I can make it work with, I live by the principles of personal honor and professional integrity and what's in this article falls short of that. That I respect and I understand. But the other

PAT: Uh huh.

GLENN: The other one you don't?

PAT: No. And why did you do the article in the first place? I don't understand that.

GLENN: Well, because the secretary put him right through.

STU: Right. Because there are reports that he's fired the aide who booked the interview.

GLENN: The aide — let me ask you this. Let's just say I'm fighting a war. You're my aide. I'm the general. You come to me and say, General Glenn, I just have to tell you, I think it would be a really good idea for you to do an interview with Rolling Stone magazine. Do I fire you after the interview or after the suggestion?

STU: Yeah, all I have to do is bring it up and I'm gone.

PAT: Yeah. And then you don't do the interview.

GLENN: You don't do the interview.

PAT: You don't do the interview.

STU: They are not going to attempt to treat you fairly.

PAT: No.

STU: Like they are going to attempt to treat the military fairly or abide by any sort of agreements they made before the interview. That's not how they run things.

PAT: Rolling Stone was looking for just exactly what they got. They were looking for this. They want to create a huge controversy and cause problems. And McChrystal had to know that going in. He's, you know, like you said, he's a smart guy.

[NOTE: Transcript may have been edited to enhance readability - audio archive includes full segment as it was originally aired]

Bill O'Reilly: Adam Schiff is in 'wonderland' during the Senate impeachment trial

Image source: BlazeTV video screen save

On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Friday, Bill O'Reilly gave his latest take on the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, and explained why he thinks House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) is like "Alice in Wonderland."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

youtu.be


Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Friday to discuss the latest developments in the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.

According to Cruz, Thursday was a "very consequential day" in the otherwise tedious and redundant impeachment proceedings.

"Yesterday, the House managers effectively threw Joe Biden under the bus," Cruz said. "They doubled down on what they started doing on the first day of arguments, which was making their entire case ... based on the proposition that there was zero evidence to justify investigating Burisma [the Ukrainian natural gas company that paid then-Vice President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, $50,000 a month to sit on the board]."

Cruz went on to explain that every time the Democrats, namely House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), rehash the "zero-evidence" argument, they open the door for Republicans to present the overwhelming evidence that contradicts those claims.

"That proposition, that there's zero evidence to investigate Burisma, is utterly and completely absurd. So, I'm looking forward to Saturday when the president's lawyers will begin presenting his case. Because what the Democrats have done, is they have opened the door to this. And I hope the president's lawyers will stand up and systematically lay out the case," Cruz said.

"They've been arguing that Hunter Biden is completely irrelevant to this case. Well, the House managers have now, through their arguments, made Hunter Biden not only relevant — he was always relevant — but critical now," he continued. "They built the entire case, like a house of cards, on the proposition that there was no reasonable basis to investigate Burisma. And that's just absurd."

The two also discussed Cruz's new podcast, "Verdict with Ted Cruz," which he records with Daily Wire host Michael Knowles each night following the Senate trial.

"Last night's podcast went through systematically ... all of the overwhelming evidence of corruption from Burisma that any president, not only had the authority to investigate, but the responsibility to investigate," Cruz said. "And that, ultimately, is why President Trump is going to be acquitted at the end of this process."

Watch the video below for more details:

Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The violent crime rate in the United States has continued to decline every year since 1991 and last year the violent crime rate nationwide was down another 3% from the previous year.

Unfortunately for the people living in Minnesota's 5th Congressional District, represented by Ilhan Omar (D), this trend toward a safer and more secure America does not apply in Minneapolis. In fact, Minneapolis police report a 53% increase in robberies since the controversial congresswoman took office in January 2019.

Minneapolis has also become the terrorist recruitment capital of the U.S. More people in Rep. Omar's district have either joined or attempted to join terrorist organizations, including Al Qaeda, al-Shabab, and ISIS, than any other place in the nation.

So, how is Rep. Omar addressing these issues? Is it just a coincidence that Minneapolis' representative in Congress is known for sowing division and hatred?

Watch this clip to hear Glenn break down the situation in Rep. Omar's district:

Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Glenn Beck: Adam Schiff is a LIAR — and we have the proof

Image source: Glenn Beck Program on BlazeTV

On the radio program Wednesday, Glenn Beck didn't hold back when discussing the latest in a long list of lies issued by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) during the Democrats' ongoing endeavor to remove President Donald Trump from office.

"I'm going to just come out and say, Adam Schiff is a liar. And he intentionally lied. And we have the proof. The media being his little lapdog, but I'll explain what's really going on, and call the man a liar to his face," Glenn asserted. "No, I'm not suggesting he's a liar. No, I'm telling you, he's a liar. ... Adam Schiff is a lying dirtbag."

A recent report in Politico claimed Schiff "mischaracterized" the content of a document sent to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as evidence against President Trump in the Senate impeachment trial. Read more on this here.

"Let me translate [for Politico]," Glenn said. "House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff lied about a text message exchange between two players in the Ukrainian saga. And we know it, because of the documents that were obtained by Politico."

A few of the other lies on Schiff's list include his repeated false claims that there was "significant evidence of collusion" between the Trump campaign and Russia leading up to the 2016 presidential election, his phony version of President Trump's phone call with the president of Ukraine, and his retracted claim that neither he nor his committee ever had contact with the Trump-Ukraine whistleblower. And the list just keeps getting longer.

Watch the video below for more details:

Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.