Glenn Beck: Black panthers respond to "kill cracker babies" comment

Glenn Beck is seen here on GlennBeck.TV, a feature available exclusively to Glenn Beck Insider Extreme members. Learn more...

PAT: You want to go back to that?

GLENN: Yeah. Go ahead. Let's take it from the beginning. You

VOICE: I hate white people, all of them. Every last iota of a cracker, I hate him. We didn't come out here to play this game. There's too much serious business going on in the black community to go out here sliding through South Street with white dirty cracker whore [ BLEEP ] on our arms and we call ourselves black men with African garb on. What the hell is wrong with you, black man? You had a (inaudible) with a white girl on your damn arm. You want freedom? You are going to have to kill some crackers. You are going to have to kill some of their babies.

PAT: Good point, yeah. I mean —

GLENN: It is a good point.

PAT: Seldom made.

GLENN: He is — well, he's regal. He's regal.

PAT: He's a king.

GLENN: Yeah, he is.

PAT: King Shamir.

STU: Royalty.

GLENN: So anyway, King Shamir fresh off his Pap Shamir tour, talks about killing cracker babies. I personally would rather go to Cracker Barrel than kill cracker berries — babies, but I am again not a pap nor a king. Now, is it chairman or general?

PAT: He's known as both. I think he's a general chairman. Or —

STU: He's generally a chairman.

PAT: Generally chairman. General.

GLENN: He's a chairman and general of what? In general he's what?

PAT: Of the Black Panther, you know, army.

GLENN: Oh, so the black — he may be a general in the Black Liberation Army?

PAT: He may be. He may be.

GLENN: And a chairman of?

PAT: The party.

GLENN: The party? Oh. Like Chairman Mao?

PAT: Kind of like that.

GLENN: Okay. So general, General Chairman Shamir who we don't know for sure if he's related to Pap or King Shamir followed up in an interview that the cracker babies — well, let's have him say it. This is new audio now.

PAT: Yeah, this is an interview with chairman Malik Zulu Shabazz.

GLENN: Same as general?

PAT: Same as general.

GLENN: All right.

PAT: Shabazz of the new Black Panther Party.

GLENN: Does he know General Chou?

PAT: We'll have to ask him.

GLENN: All right. Go ahead.

PAT: I don't know. He was asked if he agreed with the comments of King Shamir and killing cracker babies.

MALIK SHABAZZ: I'll say this. The new Black Panther Party does not believe in going out on the streets and berating black people. We don't believe on getting out and attacking people in the streets. We don't believe —

GLENN: Hang on just a second. I didn't think that that was in question.

PAT: No.

GLENN: Who asked him that question?

STU: That's the part that he finds reprehensible because he was yelling at a black guy for dating a white woman. That was the offensive part of the kill the cracker babies comment.

PAT: This is priceless.

MALIK SHABAZZ: In telegraphing what we may or may not do. I don't believe in —

GLENN: Hold it. Stop just a second. Did you hear what he just said?

PAT: Oh, yes. He will say it again.

GLENN: Play it again, please.

PAT: The whole thing?

GLENN: The whole thing

MALIK SHABAZZ: I'll say this. The new Black Panther Party does not believe in going out on the streets and berating black people. We don't believe in getting up and attacking our people in the streets. We don't believe in telegraphing what we may or may not do.

PAT: You like that?

GLENN: Yeah, I do.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: We don't believe in telegraphing what we — you know, if we want to kill cracker babies, we certainly don't want to telegraph it. I mean, that's just silliness.

STU: Yeah, changing message.

GLENN: We have been making fun of this the whole time and, well, it may — it may, on this broadcast, appear as though we are making fun of pap, colonel, chairman, and King Shamir, I want you to know that it's about to turn deadly serious in a minute. But until that time, let's continue to allow it to appear as though we're making fun of these losers.

MALIK SHABAZZ: I believe as an attorney and as a wise general, I don't believe in telegraphing anything and I don't believe —

GLENN: Stop. Hold on just —

PAT: As a wise general.

GLENN: As a wise general. Okay? Just wanted to —

STU: And attorney.

GLENN: Oh, and an attorney.

STU: Yeah, as a wise attorney and general. I don't know if he's an Attorney General but he's an attorney and a general.

PAT: He's a chairman Attorney General?

STU: That's pretty awesome.


PAT: Or is he generally a chairman attorney?

GLENN: We're not really sure.

PAT: I don't know.

GLENN: Go ahead.

MALIK SHABAZZ: I don't believe in overhyped rhetoric. I don't believe in overhyped rhetoric that is not calculated to lead to serious action. And so I would say that —

GLENN: Hold on just a second. What he's saying there is, what he's saying there is mean what you say and say what you mean.

PAT: Yeah, if you are going to say you are going to kill cracker babies, you better go do it.

GLENN: Right.

STU: And don't telegraph it to the cracker babies. That's completely —

PAT: I mean, cracker babies, you know, while he may not think they are that smart, they are pretty crafty. And you don't want them to know in advance.

GLENN: Well, they are the oppressor.

PAT: Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.

GLENN: The cracker babies are so oppressive.

PAT: We'll get to that soon.

GLENN: All right.

MALIK SHABAZZ: He has to speak better if he's going to speak for this organization ever again in the future, he has to speak with a better, more calculated representation, and I believe that he has it in him to do it.

VOICE: Well, obviously you don't believe in killing white babies?

PAT: I like that. Obviously you don't believe in killing cracker babies, white babies?

STU: I love — that's great. And I love also the fact that he's leaving it open that he could speak for the organization in the future. If this guy's going to speak for us in the future, he's going to have to change his approach slightly.

PAT: Well, he's got it in him. Really, we see all the potential. We've seen the potential that King Shamir has.

GLENN: Well, you don't just —

PAT: As a speaker.

GLENN: You don't just throw a king out. He's a king.

PAT: That's right.

GLENN: All right.

PAT: So the question is obvious, and the interviewer's trying to help him. Obviously you don't believe in killing white babies.

MALIK SHABAZZ: Not in that context, no, sir.

GLENN: Okay. Stop for a second. I'm going to take a break and I want to come back. I want to give you time to rest and think exactly what context do you kill white babies? Exactly what context do you say, you got to kill a few babies if you want to be free. What context does that — I'll give you time. This is a little homework.

For the first time in the history of "The Glenn Beck Program," former President Donald Trump joined Glenn to give his take on America's direction under President Joe Biden compared to his own administration. He explained why Biden's horrific Afghanistan withdrawal was "not even a little bit" like his plan, and why he thinks it was "the most embarrassing event in the history of our country."

Plus, the former president gave his opinion on China's potential takeover of Bagram Air Base, the Pakistani Prime Minister, and Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Glenn asked President Trump how similar the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan was to his administration's plan.

"Not even a little bit," Trump answered. "We had a great plan, but it was a very tenuous plan. It was based on many conditions. For instance, you can't kill American soldiers. ... You have to understand, I did want to get out. But I wanted to get out with dignity, and I wanted to take our equipment out. And I didn't want soldiers killed. ... What [Biden] did was just indefensible. He took the military out first and he left all the people. And then we became beggars to get the people out. I had a plan to get them out very quickly. But first, the Americans would go out."

Trump told Glenn that his plan included maintaining Bagram Air Base and explained why he would not have left "a single nail" behind in Afghanistan for the Taliban to seize.

"We were going to keep Bagram open," he explained. "We were never going to close that because, frankly, Bagram is more about China than it is about Afghanistan. It was practically on the other border of China. And now we've lost that. And you know who is taking it over? China is taking it over. We spend $10 billion to build that base. It's got the longest, most powerful runways in the world. And China has now got its representatives there and it looks like they'll take it over. Glenn, it's not believable what's happened. You know, they have Apache helicopters. These are really expensive weapons, and they have 28 of them. And they're brand-new. The latest model."

Glenn mentioned recent reports that Gen. Milley, America's top military officer, made "secret phone calls" to his counterpart in China while President Trump was in office.

"I learned early on that he was a dope," Trump said of Gen. Milley. "He made a statement to me — and I guarantee that's what happened to Biden — because I said, 'We're getting out of Afghanistan. We have to do it.' And I said, 'I want every nail. I want every screw. I want every bolt. I want every plane. I want every tank. I want it all out, down to the nails, screws, bolts ... I want every single thing. And he said, 'Sir, it's cheaper to leave it than it is to bring it.'

"The airplane might have cost $40 million, $50 million ... millions and millions of dollars. So, you think it's cheaper to leave it than to have 200 pilots fly over and fly all the equipment out? ... I said, you've got to be nuts. I mean, give me a tank of gas and a pilot and I just picked up a $40 million-dollar airplane. It was amazing. So, I learned early that this guy is a dope. But what he did, is he hurt our country ... and he shouldn't have been allowed to do it. And bad things should happen to him."

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation or find the full interview on BlazeTV:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

In a shocking but underreported conversation ahead of the G7 Speakers' meeting in London last week, Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi admitted that the administration knows China is committing "genocide" against the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang region, but thinks working with the regime on climate change is more important.

On the radio program, an outraged Glenn Beck dissected Pelosi's speech and broke down how — along with the Biden administration's abandonment of Americans in Afghanistan, and the Democrat decision to follow measures of medical "equity" — the far left is revealing how little they really care about human life.

Glenn played a video clip of Pelosi making the following statement:

We've always felt connected to China, but with their military aggression in the South China Sea, with their continuation of genocide with the Uyghurs in Xinjiang province there, with their violation of the cultural, linguistic, religious priority of Tibet, with their suppression of democracy in Hong Kong and other parts of China, as well – they're just getting worse in terms of suppression, and freedom of speech. So, human rights, security, economically [sic].

Having said all of that ... we have to work together on climate. Climate is an overriding issue and China is the leading emitter in the world, the U.S. too and developed world too, but we must work together.

"We have Nancy Pelosi admitting the United States of America knows that they're not only committing [genocide], they're continuing to commit it. Which means, we've known for a while," Glenn noted. "And what does she say? She goes on to say, yes, they're committing genocide against the Uyghurs, but having said that, I'm quoting, 'the overriding issue,' is working together on climate change.

"Would we have worked with Hitler on climate change? Would we have worked with Hitler on developing the bomb? Would we have worked with Hitler on developing the Autobahn? Would we have worked with Hitler on his socialized medicine? Would we have worked with Hitler on any of his national, socialist ideas?" he asked.

"The answer is no. No. When you're committing genocide, no! She said 'we have to work together on climate,' because climate is the 'overriding issue.' The overriding issue? There is no way to describe this mindset. That, yes, they are killing an entire group of people because of their ethnicity or religion. They are systematically rounding them up, using them for slave labor, and killing them, using their organs and selling them on the open market. They are nothing more than cattle. For us to recognize it and do nothing about it is bad enough. But to say, 'we recognize it, but we have bigger things to talk to them about,' is a horror show."

Glenn went on to urge Americans to "stand up together in love, peace, and harmony," or risk watching our nation become the worst plague on human life yet.

Watch the video clip below to hear more from Glenn:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The fall of Lehman Brothers in 2008 marked the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history and economic collapse was felt throughout the world. But now China's own version of Lehman Brothers, Evergrande, is teetering closer and closer to that edge, too. On the radio program Thursday, Glenn Beck gave the latest update and predicted how it will affect Asian markets and what it could mean for America's economy.

Glenn explained why he believes a major collapse that is happening now in China will have a cascading effect into a "controlled collapse," a managed decline that will dramatically change America's economy and the way we all live.

"You will not recognize your lifestyle. Hear me," Glenn warned. "And that's not a right-left thing. That's a right-wrong thing. We're on the wrong track. I'm telling you now, there's new information and you are not going to recognize the American lifestyle. ... It could happen tomorrow. It could happen in five years from now, but it will happen. We are headed for a very different country. One where you don't have the rights that you have. And you certainly don't have the economic privileges that Americans are used to."

"The same thing that happened in 2008 is now happening in China," Glenn continued. "This time, it's going to take everything down. When it collapses, it will take everything down."

Watch the video below to hear Glenn break down the details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Justin Haskins, editorial director of the Heartland Institute, joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to expose a shocking conversation between two Great Reset proponents — Klaus Schwab, chairman of the World Economic Forum, and Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank (Europe's equivalent to the Fed).

The way Schwab and Lagarde discuss the role central banks should play in establishing societal norms, determining your way of life, and defending against potential crisis is proof that the Great Reset is upon us, Justin explained. And the scariest part is that they're not even trying to hide it. The entire, unbelievable conversation has been published on the WEF website, which you can read here.

Glenn read an excerpt from the conversation:

Christine Lagarde: At the ECB, we have now wrapped up and concluded our strategy review, which was the first one in 17 years. And I was blessed to have an entire Governing Council unanimously agree that the fight against climate change should be one of the considerations that we take when we determine monetary policy. So at least the European Central Bank is of the view that climate change is an important component in order to decide on monetary policy. ...

Can we arrive at that trade-off between fighting climate change, preserving biodiversity and yet securing enough growth to respond to legitimate demands of the population? And my first answer, Klaus, to be firm, is that to have a way of life, we need life. And in the medium term, we do have major threats on the horizon that could cause the death of hundreds of thousands of people. So we have to think life, first. We have to think way of life, second. ...

So we have to think life, first. We have to think way of life, second. How can we come together to make sure that we secure the first priority, which is life, and also protect the way of life that people have? And make sure that the cost of it is not so high for some people, that they just cannot tolerate it. I think that the trade-off that we reach will probably require some redistribution, because it is clear that the most exposed people, the less privileged people are those that are going to need some help.

"Do you understand, America, what that means?" Glenn exclaimed. "You have elites, that you never elected, that are having these meetings ... deciding what is a legitimate need for you. And telling you that your needs are going to go away in your lifetime. You may not see a time where you get wants again. Just your needs are going to be addressed. Am I reading this wrong?"

"This is absolutely what is being said here," Justin agreed. "She's very clear that we need to make sure that way of life is second to life. We have to save all these people, hundreds of thousands of people are going to die from this supposedly existential threat of climate change. And their wants, and their desires, and their quality of living, all of that has to come second."

"This is a central bank saying this. This is not an elected official, who is accountable directly to the people. This is a central bank saying, we're going to print money. We're going to use monetary policy, to impose these ideas, to rework society in order to accomplish our goals," Justin added, addressing Lagarde's call for "some redistribution."

Will Great Reset elites — not elected by the U.S. — soon be dictating to the rest of the world? Watch the video clip below to hear Glenn and Justin break it down:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.