Google: Made mistakes? Change name!

Glenn Beck is seen here on GlennBeck.TV, a feature available exclusively to Glenn Beck Insider Extreme members. Learn more...

GLENN: The private lives of young people are now so well documented on the Internet that our children may have to change their names when they reach adulthood, according to the CEO of Google. Think of this. Eric Schmidt who I believe is on several different advisory boards with the president of the United States, Eric Schmidt suggested that young people should be entitled to change their identity to escape their misspent youth which is now recording recorded in excruciating detail on social network sites such as Facebook. "I don't believe society understands what happens when everything is available." Mr. Schmidt said he believed that every young person will one day be allowed to change their name to distance themselves from embarrassing photographs and materials stored on their friends' social media sites. 55 year old also predicted the future. Google said the Google chief said Google will know so much about its users that the search engine will be able to help them plan their lives. That sounds good.

PAT: Mmm hmmm.

GLENN: I love a search engine that is currently I believe in eight countries under investigation for having too much information.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: And spying on people and

PAT: But they will help you plan your life?

GLENN: They will help you plan your life.

PAT: Well, because they have

GLENN: Quote, they will know so much about you.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: That they will be able to help you plan your life.

PAT: Do they have an alternate name for us, too, if I want to


PAT: Do they have an Islamic name picked out for me?

GLENN: No, I don't think this is

PAT: If you tie this together, you think about this story we were doing earlier on Islam.

GLENN: Why do you do this?

PAT: And maybe you'll have to change your name to an Islamic name.

GLENN: See, why do you do this?

PAT: Is that possible?

GLENN: Now you make it ridiculous when all the name they will suggest is 11.773.8.

STU: It's true, though. I mean, they had I had an incident with Facebook this week and I had a personal like, you know, page when everyone was joining Facebook I tried it out for a little bit and I hated it. I mean, I despise social networking. You know, I have a page, you know, fan page and everything, which is fine. But as far as the personal stuff, like I just don't want it. So I discontinued this account. Two years ago, two years ago I signed it off. And that's after taking every privacy thing that they gave you and saying don't let anyone see it. I used to get complaints all the time like, why do you even have a page? There's nothing on it. Because I don't want anything on it. So yesterday I get e mails from everyone that used to be a friend of mine from two years ago when I discontinued the account saying, hey, what is this? And it's a forward from someone saying that I've been sending them advertisements for free iPads.

PAT: Man. Really?

STU: So someone got my account, reactivated it after two years of dormancy, if that's the word, and then made it, all my friends were still on it, all my pictures were still on it. I discontinued this account. All the posts were on it from then. All of it was still recorded from two years ago when I turned it off and then it took me, it must have been an hour to go through every privacy setting again and turn it all off again. It's insanity. I wouldn't put anything on that site that I didn't want everybody to see. It's it is insanity.

GLENN: I want you to

STU: They just had a report of 100 million users, some of their private information being spread around the Internet. Forget it.

GLENN: I want you just to I want you just to listen to this and think about this now in a different way. You've got to look at this from Stu's point of view and Chertoff and Ashcroft's point of view and my point of view that, you know, there's just so information is everywhere and you just do not want to engage in any of it. But listen to this again with a nontechnology concern. Eric Schmidt suggested that young people should be entitled to change their identity to escape their misspent youth which is now recorded in excruciating detail on social networking sites such as Facebook. When I read this, it wasn't about Google. It was about changing your name and identity.

Last night my kids and I, we were in bed and we were talking about we were talking about how Mommy and I had agreed with them to be their parents and they chose us as parents and they came down and we talked about Raphe and the special way that he came through adoption and the girl that carried him inside and how special she was and all of this stuff. We had this conversation last night. And I don't remember how it led there oh, I remember. I said, that's why Daddy and Mommy pray so much to try to remember what it is we promised and try to remember what we're supposed to do because we all have a job to do. We all have something that we're supposed to do, and you're in this family for a reason. And so you will carry on not only the things that I have taught you and the things that you have learned from Mom and Dad but also your name, you have to watch because our names are all connected. And so we be careful because I don't want somebody to think bad things about you because of me and vice versa.

Our children will be disconnected from their heritage. Our children will be taught that your family this is the ultimate destruction of the family and our heritage. If you read the book The Coming Insurrection, one of the chapters is destroy the family and destroy the family unit. Well, I'm sorry, but your name means something. It does. When you give up your name, you give up a lot. Does this bother anyone that in a cavalier way the CEO of Google is saying that they've got to really kind of look at this for the future, to be able to make it easy and legal, easy and legal for people just to change their names to escape their past. Their past is important. I mean, it's you don't know about progressives because they change their name! Our past and our history is important. And now we have a guy who's in the Obama administration talking about, hey, we're going to have to do that. Where else have we heard it?

MICHELLE OBAMA: And Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices, we are going to have to change our conversation, we're going to have to change our traditions, our history. We're going to have to move into a different place.

GLENN: If you lose your name, who are you? If you lose your traditions and your family, who are you? How do your children know who they came from?

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" to explain how mail-in ballots are typically disqualified during recounts at a far higher rate than in-person, Election Day ballots, and why this is "good news" for President Donald Trump's legal battle over the election.

"One of the things that gives the greatest cause for optimism is, this election ... there's a pretty marked disparity in terms of how the votes were distributed. On Election Day, with in-person voting, Donald Trump won a significant majority of the votes cast on in-person voting on Election Day. Of mail-in voting, Joe Biden won a significant majority of the votes cast early on mail-in voting," Cruz explained.

"Now, here's the good news: If you look historically to recounts, if you look historically to election litigation, the votes cast in person on Election Day tend to stand. It's sort of hard to screw that up. Those votes are generally legal, and they're not set aside. Mail-in votes historically have a much higher rate of rejection … when they're examined, there are a whole series of legal requirements that vary state by state, but mail-in votes consistently have a higher rate of rejection, which suggests that as these votes begin being examined and subjected to scrutiny, that you're going to see Joe Biden's vote tallies go down. That's a good thing," he added. "The challenge is, for President Trump to prevail, he's got to run the table. He's got to win, not just in one state but in several states. That makes it a lot harder to prevail in the litigation. I hope that he does so, but it is a real challenge and we shouldn't try to convince ourselves otherwise."

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Subscribe to BlazeTV today with our BEST DEAL EVER for $30 off with promo code GLENN.

Fox News senior meteorologist Janice Dean is perhaps even more disgusted with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) for his coronavirus response than BlazeTV's Stu Burguiere (read what Stu has to say on the subject here), and for a good reason.

She lost both of her in-laws to COVID-19 in New York's nursing homes after Gov. Cuomo's infamous nursing home mandate, which Cuomo has since had scrubbed from the state's website and blamed everyone from the New York Post to nursing care workers to (every leftist's favorite scapegoat) President Donald Trump.

Janice joined Glenn and Stu on the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday to ask why mainstream media is not holding Gov. Cuomo — who recently published a book about his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic — accountable?

"I'm vocal because I have not seen the mainstream media ask these questions or demand accountability of their leaders. [Cuomo] really has been ruling with an iron fist, and every time he does get asked a question, he blames everybody else except the person that signed that order," Janice said.

"In my mind, he's profiting off the over 30 thousand New Yorkers, including my in-laws, that died by publishing a book on 'leadership' of New York," she added. "His order has helped kill thousands of relatives of New York state. And this is not political, Glenn. This is not about Republican or Democrat. My in-laws were registered Democrats. This is not about politics. This is about accountability for something that went wrong, and it's because of your [Cuomo's] leadership that we're put into this situation."

Watch the video excerpt from the show below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

As America grows divided and afraid to disagree with the Democrats' woke plan for America, Megyn Kelly is ready to fight back for the truth. For nearly two decades, she navigated the volatile and broken world of the media. But as America leans on independent voices more than ever, she's breaking new ground with "The Megyn Kelly Show."

She joined the latest Glenn Beck Podcast to break down what's coming next after the election: Black Lives Matter is mainstream, leftists are making lists of Trump supporters, and the Hunter Biden scandal is on the back burner.

Megyn and Glenn reminisce about their cable news days (including her infamous run-in with then-presidential candidate Donald Trump) and to look into the chaotic and shady world of journalism and the growing entitlement it's bred. For example, many conservatives have been shocked by how Fox News handled the election.

Megyn defended Fox News, saying she believes Fox News' mission "is a good one," but also didn't hold back on hosts like Neil Cavuto, who cut off a White House briefing to fact check it — something she never would have done, even while covering President Obama.

Megyn also shared this insightful takeaway from her time at NBC: "Jane Fonda was an ass."

Watch the full podcast here:

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Glenn Beck has had enough of exposing scandal after scandal, just to have everyone look the other way: Benghazi, Hillary Clinton's emails, Joe and Hunter Biden's dealings in Ukraine and China … the list goes on, but no consequences are paid. Now, the media have called the election for Joe Biden and insist no one can question it. But for many of the more than 71 million people who voted for President Trump, our search for the truth isn't over yet.

On his Wednesday night special this week, Glenn called out the left's long list of alleged corruption that has gone unchecked and stressed that Donald Trump's legal team must be allowed to go through the process of investigating the multiple allegations of election fraud to ensure our voting systems are fair.

"I don't know about you, but I'm tired. I am worn out. I am fed up!" Glenn said during his opening monologue. "I've had enough. I am tired of exposing corruption, doing our homework, even going overseas and having documents translated to make sure they're exactly right, [and] presenting the evidence ... except, once we expose it, nothing happens. Nobody goes to jail. Nobody pays for a damn thing any more!"

Watch the short video clip from the full show below:

Because the content of this show is sure to set off the Big Tech censors, the full episode is only be available on BlazeTV. The election and its aftermath are the most important stories in America, so we're offering our most timely discount ever: $30 off a one-year subscription to BlazeTV with code "GLENN."