Glenn Beck: Healthcare bill author hasn't read healthcare bill?

Learn more about the Restoring Honor Rally, 8/28 in Washington DC...

GLENN: Okay. I've been busy on these things and Pat and Stu have been trying to follow what's going on especially, my favorite story I think has to come from Baucus.

PAT: Yeah, Max Baucus from Montana which is a pretty conservative state, I think he is going to have a really good time in his next election cycle because the guy is just getting smarter and smarter and more in touch with his constituents every day. Here's what he has said about the healthcare bill. He and Kathleen Sebelius were in Montana talking about the healthcare bill and people were asking him, well, Max, you helped author this thing. Did you read ‑‑ did even you read the whole bill? Because we're a little hacked off that ‑‑ and there it is. There's hacked off for you. We're a little hacked off that people haven't read the bill. And he said I ‑‑

GLENN: I love these people who say read the bill.

PAT: Read the bill.

CONYERS: I love these members that say read the bill. What good is reading the bill if it's 1,000 pages and you don't have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill.

PAT: That's what I... read the bill?

GLENN: Okay. So Max?

PAT: So Max says I don't ‑‑ look, I don't think you want me to waste my time to read every page of the healthcare bill. You know why? It's statutory language. We hire experts. What?

GLENN: Wait.

PAT: We didn't hire experts. We elected you!

GLENN: You. You're the one who's supposed to do it for us!

PAT: I get a kick out of these people who say read the bill.

GLENN: You know ‑‑

PAT: Read every page.

GLENN: Can I tell you something?

PAT: I get people who do that.

STU: Know what you're voting on.

PAT: Know, know what you're talking about. I get a kick out of these people. You know how hard it is to know what I'm talking about? I pay people a lot of money to know what I'm talking about.

STU: Have an idea of where you are sending our trillion dollars.

PAT: I get a kick out of ‑‑ do you know how much money we make? A lot. I can't keep track of trillions of dollars. I'd need a couple of accountants to do that.

GLENN: It's like, do you have the audio of Donald Rumsfeld on September 9th, 2001, saying we've found a discrepancy here; it appears that the Pentagon has misplaced or lost $2 trillion.

STU: He's criticizing that, by the way.

GLENN: I know that. No, I know that. No, he's like, we've got to get to the bottom of it. We never got to the bottom of it. I never heard anything about the $2 trillion. How do you misplace $2 trillion? Where did I put ‑‑ honey, where did I put my wallet? I mean, what, are you kidding me?

STU: The greatest thing is you actually are misquoting that number. I believe it was $2.3 trillion, which means you just left off $300 billion in a rounding error.

PAT: Nice spin trying to cover for the Bush administration again, Glenn. That's great. Way to go.

GLENN: Unbelievable.

PAT: But when you're just a Republican hack.

STU: When you are dropping off $300 billion because it's not of consequence to the amount of number, money you are talking about, that's a problem.

GLENN: That's a lot of money, yeah, that's a lot of money.

PAT: But that's where it's gotten, isn't it? It's so big now.

GLENN: $300 billion used to be real money.

PAT: Not anymore. It's not.

GLENN: Remember when $300 billion was $300 billion? Now, why read the bill?

PAT: $300 billion?

GLENN: I kept that in my sock drawer for years.

PAT: I can't even buy a small third world nation for $300 billion.

GLENN: Why shouldn't Max Baucus read the bills? Are you kidding me?

PAT: I just wrote the bill.

GLENN: We just hired a guy named bill. We just talk to him.

PAT: I hope, and I ‑‑ Max Baucus used to be ‑‑ he used to be pretty conservative.

STU: I don't know if I believe you on that.

PAT: I don't know what happened to you.

STU: You've said that before and I don't believe it.

PAT: He was pretty reasonable.

GLENN: Listen to him.

PAT: He was pretty reasonable.

PAT: Bleep, bleep, bleep, that's all, folks.

PAT: Well, Max Baucus, I think I voted for him. I think he was one of my first.

GLENN: Now it comes out.

STU: Pat Gray equals healthcare. I see.

PAT: It was 1980.

STU: Yeah, you knew, though. What did you know and when did you know it?

GLENN: Hold it. Maybe we've actually just stumbled onto the problem. When did you vote for him?

PAT: 1980.

GLENN: 1980.

PAT: '80.

GLENN: He's still there.

PAT: He's still there. I think he got there in '76 but I was too young to vote at the time. So I think he's ‑‑

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

PAT: I mean, the guy has been there forever!

GLENN: That's the problem.

PAT: Yeah, it's time to go, Max.

GLENN: Send them home.

PAT: Home! Max Baucus phone home. Go home.

STU: Wow, you talked about the 1980 vote with a 1982 reference.

GLENN: It was very nice.

PAT: Tied it right in.

GLENN: Not a lot of old‑timey radio people can do that as well and as seamlessly as Pat has just done.

STU: (Laughing).

GLENN: That is very, very good.

PAT: That's when radio used to mean something, the ET references.

This week on the Glenn Beck Podcast, Glenn spoke with Vox co-founder Matthew Yglesias about his new book, "One Billion Americans: The Case for Thinking Bigger."

Matthew and Glenn agree that, while conservatives and liberals may disagree on a lot, we're not as far apart as some make it seem. If we truly want America to continue doing great things, we must spend less time fighting amongst ourselves.

Watch a clip from the full interview with Matthew Yglesias below:


Find the full podcast on Glenn's YouTube channel or on Blaze Media's podcast network.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

'A convenient boogeyman for misinformation artists': Why is the New York Times defending George Soros?

Image source: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images

On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday, Glenn discussed the details of a recent New York Times article that claims left-wing billionaire financier George Soros "has become a convenient boogeyman for misinformation artists who have falsely claimed that he funds spontaneous Black Lives Matter protests as well as antifa, the decentralized and largely online, far-left activist network that opposes President Trump."

The Times article followed last week's bizarre Fox News segment in which former House Speaker Newt Gingrich appeared to be censored for criticizing Soros (read more here). The article also labeled Glenn a "conspiracy theorist" for his tweet supporting Gingrich.

Watch the video clip below for details:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The former ambassador to Russia under the Obama Administration, Michael McFaul, came up with "7 Pillars of Color Revolution," a list of seven steps needed to incite the type of revolution used to upend Eastern European countries like Ukraine and Georgia in the past two decades. On his TV special this week, Glenn Beck broke down the seven steps and showed how they're happening right now in America.

Here are McFaul's seven steps:

1. Semi-autocratic regime (not fully autocratic) – provides opportunity to call incumbent leader "fascist"

2. Appearance of unpopular president or incumbent leader

3. United and organized opposition – Antifa, BLM

4. Effective system to convince the public (well before the election) of voter fraud

5. Compliant media to push voter fraud narrative

6. Political opposition organization able to mobilize "thousands to millions in the streets"

7. Division among military and police


Glenn explained each "pillar," offering examples and evidence of how the Obama administration laid out the plan for an Eastern European style revolution in order to completely upend the American system.

Last month, McFaul made a obvious attempt to downplay his "color revolutions" plan with the following tweet:

Two weeks later, he appeared to celebrate step seven of his plan in this now-deleted tweet:



As Glenn explains in this clip, the Obama administration's "7 Pillars of Color Revolution" are all playing out – just weeks before President Donald Trump takes on Democratic candidate Joe Biden in the November election.

Watch the video clip below to hear more from Glenn:


Watch the full special "CIVIL WAR: The Way America Could End in 2020" here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Start your free trial and get $20 off a one-year subscription with code BANTHIS.

Modern eugenics: Will Christians fight this deadly movement?

Photo by Olga Kononenko on Unsplash

Last month, without much fanfare, a new research paper disclosed that 94 percent of Belgian physicians support the killing of new-born babies after birth if they are diagnosed with a disability.

A shocking revelation indeed that did not receive the attention it demanded. Consider this along with parents who believe that if their unborn babies are pre-diagnosed with a disability, they would choose to abort their child. Upwards of 70 percent of mothers whose children are given a prenatal disability diagnosis, such as Down Syndrome, abort to avoid the possibility of being burdened with caring for a disabled child.

This disdain for the disabled hits close to home for me. In 1997, my family received a letter from Michael Schiavo, the husband of my sister, Terri Schiavo, informing us that he intended to petition a court to withdraw Terri's feeding tube.

For those who do not remember, in 1990, at the age of 26, Terri experienced a still-unexplained collapse while at home with Michael, who subsequently became her legal guardian. Terri required only love and care, food and water via feeding tube since she had difficulty swallowing as a result of her brain injury. Nonetheless, Michael's petition was successful, and Terri's life was intentionally ended in 2005 by depriving her of food and water, causing her to die from dehydration and starvation. It took almost two excruciating weeks.

Prior to my sister's predicament, the biases that existed towards persons with disabilities had been invisible to me. Since then, I have come to learn the dark history of deadly discrimination towards persons with disabilities.

Indeed, some 20 years prior to Germany's T4 eugenics movement, where upwards of 200,000 German citizens were targeted and killed because of their physical or mental disability, the United States was experiencing its own eugenics movement.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas documented some of this history in his concurring opinion in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., Justice Thomas describes how eugenics became part of the academic curriculum being taught in upwards of 400 American universities and colleges.

It was not solely race that was the target of the U.S. eugenics movement. Eugenicists also targeted the institutionalized due to incurable illness, the physically and cognitively disabled, the elderly, and those with medical dependency.

In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down Roe v. Wade, which wiped out pro-life laws in nearly every state and opened the floodgates to abortion throughout the entirety of pregnancy. Since then, 60 million children have been killed. Abortion as we know it today has become a vehicle for a modern-day eugenics program.

Since the Catholic Church was established, the Truth of Christ was the greatest shield against these types of attacks on the human person and the best weapon in the fight for equality and justice. Tragically, however, for several decades, the Church has been infiltrated by modernist clergy, creating disorder and confusion among the laity, perverting the teachings of the Church and pushing a reckless supposed “social justice" agenda.

My family witnessed this firsthand during Terri's case. Church teaching is clear: it is our moral obligation to provide care for the cognitively disabled like Terri. However, Bishop Robert Lynch, who was the bishop of the Diocese of St. Petersburg, Florida, during Terri's case, offered no support and was derelict in his duties during the fight for Terri's life.

Bishop Lynch had an obligation to use his position to protect Terri from the people trying to kill her and to uphold Church teaching. Indeed, it was not only the silence of Bishop Lynch but that of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), which also remained silent despite my family's pleas for help, that contributed to Terri being needlessly starved and dehydrated to death.

My family's experience, sadly, has turned out to be more of the rule than the exception. Consider what happened to Michael Hickson. Hickson was a 36-year-old, brain-injured person admitted to a Texas hospital after contracting COVID-19. Incredibly—and against the wishes of Michael's wife—the hospital decided not to treat Michael because they arbitrarily decided that his “quality of life" was “unacceptably low" due to his pre-existing disability. Michael died within a week once the decision not to treat him was imposed upon him despite the efforts of his wife to obtain basic care for her husband.

During my sister's case and our advocacy work with patients and their families, it would have been helpful to have a unified voice coming from our clergy consistently supporting the lives of our medically vulnerable. We desperately need to see faithful Catholic pastoral witness that confounds the expectations of the elite by pointing to Jesus Christ and the moral law.

A Church that appears more concerned with baptizing the latest social and political movements is a Church that may appear to be “relevant," but one that may also find itself swallowed up by the preoccupations of our time.

As Catholics, we know all too well the reluctance of priests to preach on issues of abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and other pro-life issues. We have heard that the Church cannot risk becoming too political.

At the same time, some within the Church are now openly supporting Black Lives Matter, an organization that openly declares itself hostile to the family, to moral norms as taught by the Church, and whose founders embrace the deadly ideology of Marxism.

For example, Bishop Mark J. Seitz of El Paso, Texas, knelt in prayer with a cardboard sign asserting his support for this ideology.

Recently, during an online liturgy of the mass, Fr. Kenneth Boller at The Church of St. Francis Xavier in New York, led the congregation with what appears to sound like questions affirming the BLM agenda. Moreover, while reading these questions, pictures of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery, assumed victims of racial injustice, were placed on the altar of St. Francis Xavier Church, a place typically reserved for Saints of the Catholic Church.

Contrast these two stories with what happened in the Diocese of Lafayette, Indiana, where Rev. Theodore Rothrock of St. Elizabeth Seton Church fell victim to the ire of Bishop Timothy Doherty. Fr. Rothrock used strong language in his weekly church bulletin criticizing the Black Lives Matter movement and its organizers. Consequently, Bishop Doherty suspended Fr. Rothrock from public ministry.

In 1972, Pope Pius VI said, “The smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God." It seems that too many of our clergy today are enjoying the smell.

I encourage all who are concerned about the human right to life and about Christ-centered reforms in our culture and our Church to raise your voices for pastoral leadership in every area of our shared lives as Christian people.

Bobby Schindler is a Senior Fellow with Americans United for Life, Associate Scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, and President of the Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network.