Libs counter Restoring Honor with Rangel




Stu and Pat are seen here on GlennBeck.TV, a feature available exclusively to Glenn Beck Insider Extreme members. Learn more...

PAT: The liberals are fired up and ready to go with their own rally, too. This is really good because there hasn't been a good rally on the mall in four days.

STU: Yeah. A good four days now.

PAT: Good four days.

STU: Almost 100 hours.

PAT: So they feel like they need to counter the Restoring Honor rally because I don't know why we're thinking about trying to restore honor. Who would want to do that? Who would want to do that? So they are going to protest honor and I guess they are doing a pretty good job because they invited Charlie Rangel.

STU: Because if you're going to do something to oppose the restoration of honor, who better to represent your cause than one Charlie Rangel?

PAT: Good place to start, you know, right there with Charlie Rangel.

RANGEL: And to Centers for America, we have a lot of strange people coming to Washington.

STU: Strange?

RANGEL: Don't let them fill the vacuum of the Stars and Stripes. That is really you. That's what you stand for. Get fired up once again. Don't give up! Don't give out! Don't give in! This is our country; let's reclaim it. God bless America.

STU: Yeah! Woo!

PAT: Don't give up, don't give out?

STU: Right.

PAT: Is that date suggestions for, you know, your weekend?

STU: I'm not exactly sure. You know, you feel like the guy who's being indicted on ethics charges, maybe not the guy you want to represent I guess he is, though, perfect for an anti Restoring Honor rally.



Listen to Stu & Pat on the 4th Hour every weekday at noon ET following the radio program. Available exclusively on the Insider Extreme. Sign-up now!

PAT: Yeah.

STU: On 10/2/10 which is, of course, it's a little upsetting to me personally because why would they schedule a rally on the day Gandhi was born?

PAT: Why are you dishonoring Gandhi? Why?

STU: That's sacred. Obviously everybody knows that, everybody talks about

PAT: Mahatma Gandhi. Come on.

STU: We're talking about a guy who is really, you know, peaceful, he's known for the way he brought peace to the world. And then you have unions hijacking the dream of Gandhi.

PAT: Known for violence.

STU: Because they are known for violence obviously and here they are. They come out, they're trampling on the dream of Gandhi by just scheduling this hate rally on 10/2/10, his own birthday. Pat, this is very disturbing.

PAT: It is.

STU: It's very upsetting.

PAT: What, are they going to wear diapers, too, and white robes and stuff?

STU: Probably.

PAT: I'll bet.

STU: Well, you knew their plan was to hijack it because they not only picked the day that Mahatma Gandhi was born but then they signaled the hijacking by also scheduling it on the day that a Chinese airline was hijacked and crashed, killing 132 people.

PAT: Oh, my gosh.

STU: And it's so obvious what they are doing there.

PAT: Oh, my gosh.

STU: The intentional plan of hijacking Gandhi with these two, these two specific things happening on this date, just magically, Pat. Just, they just magically scheduled these two events, the event on the same day as these two events, hijacking and Gandhi, clearly they are sending a message here.

PAT: Coincidence? I think not.

STU: No.

PAT: I think not.

STU: Hijacking the dream of Mahatma Gandhi, I didn't think they would go any lower.

PAT: I don't know how low these people plan to stoop but clearly quite low.

STU: And on the day that Charles Schultz Peanuts was first scheduled. I mean, this is a sacred day here in America.

PAT: No, it is not.

STU: And they are clearly intentionally scheduling it.

PAT: They are not pretending not to know that.

STU: No.

PAT: I mean, they have to admit they knew that that was that day, that 10/2/10 is the day that Charles Schultz scheduled Peanuts.

STU: How about this, Pat. George Washington sent the proposed constitutional amendments to the states for ratification on this day.

PAT: I was just going to bring that one up.

STU: And they are stomping on the dream.

PAT: Why George Washington? Why do these people hate the father of our country? Why do they loathe him? Why do they hate all white people? And all Indian people, you know, with Mahatma Gandhi?

STU: Why? Why do they do it? And you know this is I would say I'd like to also play off the fact that they kept saying 8/28 was going to be about politics, but I can't do that because it actually is going to be about politics. They keep saying we're going to get people out to the voting booth, we are going to oppose Glenn's rally because Glenn's rally will do nothing to help at the midterm election booth. When did we say anything about the midterm election booth? Did you watch any of the rally? It has nothing to do with elections. And yet again they just keep going back to the same five or six things that have already been disproved because their audience is so lazy, they are just going to believe whatever they say.

PAT: Yeah.

STU: It's sort of sad. But in a way, I mean, I guess it gives you a little bit of hope for the future.

PAT: I mean, they weren't going to let the corporations hijack this thing, the corporations who put this last rally on? What corporation? Tell me, name the corporation that put together that, other than Mercury Radio Arts, that put together the rally we had on 8/28.

STU: Halliburton. Halliburton had to have something to do with it. You know it. You know it!

PAT: All right. Well, other than the obvious, Halliburton, okay.

STU: Mmm hmmm. Mmm hmmm.

PAT: Obviously they had something to do with it. They have something to do with everything.

STU: We initially had the Hope award going to the BP CEO but that fell through.

PAT: He didn't want to have anything to do with this.

STU: We're actually worse publicity than the actual oil spill.

PAT: Yeah.

STU: That's unfortunately true.

PAT: You know, there was not a single corporation involved in this, not one. I mean, there were maybe heads of corporations, a few.

STU: Yeah.

PAT: Giving some $25,000, $50,000 donations. There were a couple, maybe a handful of those. Most, almost all of our donations came in $100 or less increments.

STU: Yeah, I don't know if we fell for the hype or what but we were thinking there were going to be a lot of bigger donations from really rich people would step to the plate. And some of them did, there were some that gave large donations but really this came from you guys, the audience who had money pouring in for the Special Operations Warrior Foundation. And really that's what it comes down to. I mean, the fact that we were able to raise far more than we ever expected for this event, and the showing was far larger than we could have ever expected. You know, I mean, it's a testament to the audience really.

PAT: It is.

STU: Not to corporations. It's such a standard talking point.

PAT: It was not promoted by Fox News, it was not covered wall to wall by Fox News.

STU: No.

PAT: I mean, they did less drop ins news wise than CNN and NBC. CNN and NBC practically gave us wall to wall coverage.

STU: They are still doing it.

PAT: They're still.

STU: It's Friday and they are still covering it basically wall to wall.

PAT: It is almost a week later now and they are still covering it like crazy. That's all they could talk about.

STU: Yeah. They are obsessed.

PAT: So now the AFL CIO, SEIU, the American Federation of Teachers, all these unions and liberal groups including the NAACP are all getting together to do this march on the mall.

STU: 10/2/10.

PAT: 10/2/10. And let's see. The Executive Vice President of the AFL CIO Arlene Holt Baker, I love this quote, says we are fueled by hope and not hate.

STU: Of course, remember we had faith, hate and charity.

PAT: Yeah, that's right.

STU: And that was the three themes of the Glenn Beck rally. And then we gave Albert Pujols the hate award which was delivered by Tony LaRussa. So you could definitely see how it was a hateful rally.

PAT: Brought out the hard core, the heavy metal hate bands that just reach into the microphone. Remember that part?

STU: Oh, yeah.

PAT: Oh, man, they were awesome.

STU: The def metal bands?

PAT: Yeah, the def metal?

STU: That was fantastic.

PAT: Love that metal.

STU: We really were trying with a hateful vibe there with all the clergy on stage. You can't find a more hateful group than 240 members of the clergy.

PAT: You really can't. And we looked. We tried to.

STU: We tried really hard.

PAT: We tried. We just couldn't find it.

[NOTE: Transcript may have been edited to enhance readability - audio archive includes full segment as it was originally aired]

This week on the Glenn Beck Podcast, Glenn spoke with Vox co-founder Matthew Yglesias about his new book, "One Billion Americans: The Case for Thinking Bigger."

Matthew and Glenn agree that, while conservatives and liberals may disagree on a lot, we're not as far apart as some make it seem. If we truly want America to continue doing great things, we must spend less time fighting amongst ourselves.

Watch a clip from the full interview with Matthew Yglesias below:


Find the full podcast on Glenn's YouTube channel or on Blaze Media's podcast network.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

'A convenient boogeyman for misinformation artists': Why is the New York Times defending George Soros?

Image source: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images

On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday, Glenn discussed the details of a recent New York Times article that claims left-wing billionaire financier George Soros "has become a convenient boogeyman for misinformation artists who have falsely claimed that he funds spontaneous Black Lives Matter protests as well as antifa, the decentralized and largely online, far-left activist network that opposes President Trump."

The Times article followed last week's bizarre Fox News segment in which former House Speaker Newt Gingrich appeared to be censored for criticizing Soros (read more here). The article also labeled Glenn a "conspiracy theorist" for his tweet supporting Gingrich.

Watch the video clip below for details:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The former ambassador to Russia under the Obama Administration, Michael McFaul, came up with "7 Pillars of Color Revolution," a list of seven steps needed to incite the type of revolution used to upend Eastern European countries like Ukraine and Georgia in the past two decades. On his TV special this week, Glenn Beck broke down the seven steps and showed how they're happening right now in America.

Here are McFaul's seven steps:

1. Semi-autocratic regime (not fully autocratic) – provides opportunity to call incumbent leader "fascist"

2. Appearance of unpopular president or incumbent leader

3. United and organized opposition – Antifa, BLM

4. Effective system to convince the public (well before the election) of voter fraud

5. Compliant media to push voter fraud narrative

6. Political opposition organization able to mobilize "thousands to millions in the streets"

7. Division among military and police


Glenn explained each "pillar," offering examples and evidence of how the Obama administration laid out the plan for an Eastern European style revolution in order to completely upend the American system.

Last month, McFaul made a obvious attempt to downplay his "color revolutions" plan with the following tweet:

Two weeks later, he appeared to celebrate step seven of his plan in this now-deleted tweet:



As Glenn explains in this clip, the Obama administration's "7 Pillars of Color Revolution" are all playing out – just weeks before President Donald Trump takes on Democratic candidate Joe Biden in the November election.

Watch the video clip below to hear more from Glenn:


Watch the full special "CIVIL WAR: The Way America Could End in 2020" here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Start your free trial and get $20 off a one-year subscription with code BANTHIS.

Modern eugenics: Will Christians fight this deadly movement?

Photo by Olga Kononenko on Unsplash

Last month, without much fanfare, a new research paper disclosed that 94 percent of Belgian physicians support the killing of new-born babies after birth if they are diagnosed with a disability.

A shocking revelation indeed that did not receive the attention it demanded. Consider this along with parents who believe that if their unborn babies are pre-diagnosed with a disability, they would choose to abort their child. Upwards of 70 percent of mothers whose children are given a prenatal disability diagnosis, such as Down Syndrome, abort to avoid the possibility of being burdened with caring for a disabled child.

This disdain for the disabled hits close to home for me. In 1997, my family received a letter from Michael Schiavo, the husband of my sister, Terri Schiavo, informing us that he intended to petition a court to withdraw Terri's feeding tube.

For those who do not remember, in 1990, at the age of 26, Terri experienced a still-unexplained collapse while at home with Michael, who subsequently became her legal guardian. Terri required only love and care, food and water via feeding tube since she had difficulty swallowing as a result of her brain injury. Nonetheless, Michael's petition was successful, and Terri's life was intentionally ended in 2005 by depriving her of food and water, causing her to die from dehydration and starvation. It took almost two excruciating weeks.

Prior to my sister's predicament, the biases that existed towards persons with disabilities had been invisible to me. Since then, I have come to learn the dark history of deadly discrimination towards persons with disabilities.

Indeed, some 20 years prior to Germany's T4 eugenics movement, where upwards of 200,000 German citizens were targeted and killed because of their physical or mental disability, the United States was experiencing its own eugenics movement.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas documented some of this history in his concurring opinion in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., Justice Thomas describes how eugenics became part of the academic curriculum being taught in upwards of 400 American universities and colleges.

It was not solely race that was the target of the U.S. eugenics movement. Eugenicists also targeted the institutionalized due to incurable illness, the physically and cognitively disabled, the elderly, and those with medical dependency.

In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down Roe v. Wade, which wiped out pro-life laws in nearly every state and opened the floodgates to abortion throughout the entirety of pregnancy. Since then, 60 million children have been killed. Abortion as we know it today has become a vehicle for a modern-day eugenics program.

Since the Catholic Church was established, the Truth of Christ was the greatest shield against these types of attacks on the human person and the best weapon in the fight for equality and justice. Tragically, however, for several decades, the Church has been infiltrated by modernist clergy, creating disorder and confusion among the laity, perverting the teachings of the Church and pushing a reckless supposed “social justice" agenda.

My family witnessed this firsthand during Terri's case. Church teaching is clear: it is our moral obligation to provide care for the cognitively disabled like Terri. However, Bishop Robert Lynch, who was the bishop of the Diocese of St. Petersburg, Florida, during Terri's case, offered no support and was derelict in his duties during the fight for Terri's life.

Bishop Lynch had an obligation to use his position to protect Terri from the people trying to kill her and to uphold Church teaching. Indeed, it was not only the silence of Bishop Lynch but that of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), which also remained silent despite my family's pleas for help, that contributed to Terri being needlessly starved and dehydrated to death.

My family's experience, sadly, has turned out to be more of the rule than the exception. Consider what happened to Michael Hickson. Hickson was a 36-year-old, brain-injured person admitted to a Texas hospital after contracting COVID-19. Incredibly—and against the wishes of Michael's wife—the hospital decided not to treat Michael because they arbitrarily decided that his “quality of life" was “unacceptably low" due to his pre-existing disability. Michael died within a week once the decision not to treat him was imposed upon him despite the efforts of his wife to obtain basic care for her husband.

During my sister's case and our advocacy work with patients and their families, it would have been helpful to have a unified voice coming from our clergy consistently supporting the lives of our medically vulnerable. We desperately need to see faithful Catholic pastoral witness that confounds the expectations of the elite by pointing to Jesus Christ and the moral law.

A Church that appears more concerned with baptizing the latest social and political movements is a Church that may appear to be “relevant," but one that may also find itself swallowed up by the preoccupations of our time.

As Catholics, we know all too well the reluctance of priests to preach on issues of abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and other pro-life issues. We have heard that the Church cannot risk becoming too political.

At the same time, some within the Church are now openly supporting Black Lives Matter, an organization that openly declares itself hostile to the family, to moral norms as taught by the Church, and whose founders embrace the deadly ideology of Marxism.

For example, Bishop Mark J. Seitz of El Paso, Texas, knelt in prayer with a cardboard sign asserting his support for this ideology.

Recently, during an online liturgy of the mass, Fr. Kenneth Boller at The Church of St. Francis Xavier in New York, led the congregation with what appears to sound like questions affirming the BLM agenda. Moreover, while reading these questions, pictures of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery, assumed victims of racial injustice, were placed on the altar of St. Francis Xavier Church, a place typically reserved for Saints of the Catholic Church.

Contrast these two stories with what happened in the Diocese of Lafayette, Indiana, where Rev. Theodore Rothrock of St. Elizabeth Seton Church fell victim to the ire of Bishop Timothy Doherty. Fr. Rothrock used strong language in his weekly church bulletin criticizing the Black Lives Matter movement and its organizers. Consequently, Bishop Doherty suspended Fr. Rothrock from public ministry.

In 1972, Pope Pius VI said, “The smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God." It seems that too many of our clergy today are enjoying the smell.

I encourage all who are concerned about the human right to life and about Christ-centered reforms in our culture and our Church to raise your voices for pastoral leadership in every area of our shared lives as Christian people.

Bobby Schindler is a Senior Fellow with Americans United for Life, Associate Scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, and President of the Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network.