Glenn vs. Tania

GLENN: I last night had the most bizarre argument with my wife at 11:00 at night. And I just said to her, you are seriously not having this argument with me. And here it is. That hot babe with the Jets, my wife was actually saying, "Well, she deserved it." I said, what?

PAT: She deserved it?

GLENN: Well, she didn't say she deserved it. She said she's stupid.

PAT: Well, okay.

GLENN: And I said

PAT: And what was your problem with that?

GLENN: Well, I don't know. I've never talked to this really hot sports reporter.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: But how is she stupid exactly? And she said, look at the way she's dressed. And I said, oh, don't, really don't go down this road. Look at the way she's dressed? And she said, yes. You don't go

PAT: Into a locker room of football, NFL football players dressed like that? I agree with that.

GLENN: Tania, is that you?

PAT: I agree with that.

GLENN: Really, do you?

PAT: I agree with that.

STU: You've gotten much, much uglier, Tania.

GLENN: So in other words, this is my wife's point. Guys are visual and you are going into a locker room with a bunch of football players. So we have a lower standard? Or are you just saying that it is are we not judging people by the content of their character but by their job status?

PAT: No.

GLENN: Or by what? What are we

PAT: First of all we have to define what's harassment?

GLENN: No, no, no. No, no.

PAT: First of all she said she didn't even notice anything wrong.

GLENN: We didn't even get there. We didn't even get there. And my wife was saying she's visual men are visual. And I said, oh, thank goodness, honey, I hope I don't walk by a hooker who's really hot today because I'm visual and I just won't be able to contain myself.

STU: This is a great excuse for you. You can do whatever you want.

GLENN: I know.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: I kept making her point. I said, oh, my goodness, thank you, honey, for permission. She said, well, not you. And I said, why? Are guys different? Do we hold people to different standards? Or do we say there's one standard? I don't care if you're a football player or who you are, you don't do that.

PAT: What happened?

GLENN: they're throwing footballs at her? I mean, that's not harassment.

PAT: That's not. And they weren't throwing them at her. They were throwing them toward her.

STU: So they could look at her.

PAT: You know, so probably the wide receiver could get over there and take a look at her and then

GLENN: I mean, may I?

STU: That's not a criminal act.

PAT: That's not a criminal act.

GLENN: That is not a criminal act.

PAT: Harassment. That's not a criminal act.

GLENN: Almost let me just say something. I saw the picture of her yesterday like 4,000 times.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: And I think there is magnets in her pants and steel in my eyes because

STU: It's hard not to look at certain areas.

GLENN: It is hard not to look.

STU: Yes.

GLENN: It could be the magnet thing or I was just weak and pathetic. But so you can understand it, but that is a man. That's the part you're supposed to overcome. That's the natural man part of you.

STU: Right.

GLENN: True.

STU: I mean, there's a huge line here between harassment and noticing.

PAT: Right.

STU: And you know what? Every time, you know, you drive by someone who looks attractive and you might slow down and look?

GLENN: For instance

STU: You could get to any ridiculous extent of that.

GLENN: For instance, here's the thing. When I first saw her picture on TV, I mean, I was like, holy cow, that's a nice photograph. Then

STU: That's not what you said.

GLENN: Every time

PAT: You were admiring the photograph?

GLENN: Yes, I was. It's an art thing. But anyway, so

PAT: So you're wondering who took the picture.

GLENN: So I was wondering who took that. That is very nice framing.

PAT: Mmm hmmm.

GLENN: So I am looking at that and I, of course, have the natural man thought. Now, the rest of the time that it comes on TV, I try to avoid it. And then when I do see on TV, I'm thinking, I know why this is on TV.

STU: I didn't try to avoid it at all because it's part of the story, Glenn. You have to understand that this is a photo she released in her own defense. And if you don't examine the photo, you are not acknowledging her evidence, her backup or her side of the story.

GLENN: This is part of these, the argument that my wife and I had. She said, why would she release these photos of her? And I said, what part of her outfit, her shoulders are covered, she's wearing long pants. Granted, they are very, very tight pants.

STU: They that is a complete understatement. They could not possibly be tighter than they are.

GLENN: I think I could challenge that.

STU: I disagree. I don't think it's possible. I don't think it's possible for them to be tighter.

GLENN: We could ask her to try on the size smaller.

STU: There's no way she could get in. She would get in up to her calves and she would give up. She would give up with hopeless

GLENN: This is where you go. This is where you go. Now, all right. So I said to her also, I said, honey, have you ever watched Telemundo? She's a Spanish reporter, right?

PAT: Azteca or something, TV Azteca?

GLENN: For Mexico TV?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Have you ever watched Mexican TV?

STU: Well

GLENN: Yes. Every

STU: Every man in America.

GLENN: Do you speak Spanish?

STU: I do not, no.

GLENN: Neither do I. I've watched Telemundo, okay? Every guy, you know, will pretend that we're watching it, try to figure out what's going on. No, we're not. They're all hot and scantily clad. I mean, this is the way it is. So it's part of her job. If she's not looking and dressing like that, she's not going to be on

STU: She advertises herself as the hottest

GLENN: She's on Mexican television.

STU: Yes. But for her to advertise herself as the hottest sports reporter in America and then act shocked when people think she's hot, I mean, she's defined herself as hot!

GLENN: No. Wait, wait.

PAT: But this is the key to the argument and we should come back and talk about it because we're out of time, but I think that is the key.

GLENN: That is the key to the argument.

STU: It doesn't excuse the excuse.

GLENN: Yes.

STU: They say Pat calls

PAT: There doesn't seem to be abuse in this case.

GLENN: I agree with you.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: I agree with you. But let's not also, let's not excuse, somebody comes in dressing inappropriately or whatever as, guys, you don't become pigs.

STU: No. Of course not.

PAT: No.

STU: Don't excuse it.

PAT: But when you walk into an NFL locker room, guys are in their towels or, you know, some of them probably naked.

STU: And who's getting harassed there? They're naked.

PAT: Yeah.

STU: Why do they have to be interviewed by a woman.

GLENN: Hold on just a second. Hold on just a second.

STU: Sorry.

GLENN: Dom, can you put the picture back up? Because that's a new picture. I haven't seen it.

PAT: Oh, my gosh.

GLENN: The new picture.

PAT: I didn't know we could do that.

GLENN: Now look at the framing on that.

PAT: Now see, for those not watching on the Insiders, which is 99.9%. Insider Extreme.

GLENN: Holy

STU: Is that a catcall? Did you just make a catcall?

PAT: There is a photo of her now and you are not even in the locker room naked and she's flashed on the screen in the studio.

GLENN: So me being in the locker room naked

PAT: And you're making explanations.

GLENN: Wait a minute, wait a minute. It would be okay for me to make these comments?

PAT: Is it okay? No. But you are probably going to make some sort of exclamation. These are NFL football players and they are going to

GLENN: Okay. So we have a lower standard. I just want to make sure. We have a lower standard of ethics for NFL football players.

PAT: No. But there is a higher standard for harassment. I'm sorry if you're embarrassed. Don't go into a men's locker room. If you don't want to be embarrassed, don't go in there and interview superstars.

GLENN: Dom, for the love of Pete, take the picture off the Insider Extreme. I can't I'm surrounded by monitors, please.

STU: I'm being deluged with photos from everyone I know right now of this. This is not what I need in the middle of a broadcast. I don't know what you guys said for the last three minutes. I have absolutely no idea.

GLENN: See, that's what it is.

STU: This is a problem.

GLENN: My wife is right about guys being visual, but that doesn't excuse us.

STU: You are the one doing catcalls.

GLENN: I mean, unless it does, honey.

[NOTE: Transcript may have been edited to enhance readability - audio archive includes full segment as it was originally aired]

Legal scholar and famed criminal defense attorney Alan Dershowitz has a message for partisans dividing America: "A plague on both your houses." He voted for Hillary Clinton. He endorsed Joe Biden. He's a man who is basically the Forrest Gump of American judicial history.

Look up a big court case over the past few decades, and you'll probably see him standing in the background. He's represented notorious clients like Mike Tyson, Patty Hearst, Harry Reems, Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, and yes, Donald Trump. It's made him a target for both the left and right.

Alan also describes himself as a "civil libertarian," and that's probably why he and Glenn Beck get along despite their opposing political views. His story is like a history lesson, spanning half a century, and it just might be the key to bridging the political divide.

On this week's podcast, Alan explained that while he's a strong defender of the Constitution, he's never been a big fan of the Second Amendment. In the past he's called it absurd and outdated, and even today, he admits that he wouldn't have ingrained it into our Constitution if he was a framer. However, with the whole Bill of Rights under attack, he's now fully in defense of our right to bear arms. Because if the Second Amendment changes, any amendment could be next.

"I'm now a supporter of the Second Amendment. I don't want to change it. I don't want to change one word of it, because I'm afraid that if I get to change the Second Amendment, other people will get to change the First Amendment, and the Fifth Amendment," Alan said. "So, I am committed to preserving the Bill of Rights, every single word, every comma, and every space between the words."

Watch a clip from the full interview with Alan Dershowitz below:

Watch the full podcast below, on Glenn's YouTube channel, or on Blaze Media's podcast network.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Investigative reporter David Steinberg joined the radio program Monday, to explain how a new video may provide enough evidence to begin a FBI investigation into alleged illegal practices by Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar's campaign.

In the video, which was produced and released by Project Veritas, residents of Omar's community describe campaign teams that not only conduct illegal ballot harvesting practices but also pay people for their blank absentee ballots.

Steinberg told Glenn that, if these charges prove to be true, the federal government could bypass Omar's friend and protector, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison. Could 2020 be the beginning of the end for Omar's political career?

Watch the video below to catch Glenn's conversation with David Steinberg:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Mike Fratantuono is the manager of Sunset Restaurant in Glen Burnie, Maryland. He wrote in the Washington Post's COVID-19 series about the recent, heartbreaking loss of his business, a restaurant that has been in his family for "four generations and counting."

"I know this virus is real, okay? It's real and it's awful. I'm not disputing any of that," Mike wrote. "But our national hysteria is worse. We allowed the virus to take over our economy, our small businesses, our schools, our social lives, our whole quality of life. We surrendered, and now everything is infected."

On the radio program Monday, Glenn Beck reacted to Mike's letter, which he shared in full, adding his hope that those in government are ultimately held responsible for what he called the biggest theft of the Western world.

"This is the biggest theft of, not only money, but of heritage and of hope," Glenn said. "The United States government and many of the states are responsible for this, not you. And hopefully someday soon, we'll return to some semblance of sanity, and those responsible for this theft, this rape of the Western world, will be held responsible."

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

We did our homework over the weekend; we did the research so we can tell you what is likely coming from Senate Democrats regarding President Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett. Based on our research and the anonymous people who have already come forward to talk about Coney Barrett's youth, these are the main shocking things you can expect Senate Democrats to seize on during the confirmation process…

A man has come forward under the banner of "#MenToo," to say that in second grade, Amy Coney Barrett and her best friend at the time, cornered him at a birthday party at Chuck-E-Cheese and "injected him with a full dose of cooties." Which, if true, would obviously be disqualifying for serving on the highest court in the land.

Then there's a woman who says when she was nine-years-old, she lived on the same street as Amy Coney Barrett. She alleges that Coney-Barrett borrowed her VHS tape of Herbie Goes Bananas and did not return it for at least six months. And then when she did finally get the tape back, the woman says Coney Barrett did not even bother to rewind it. The FBI has interviewed at least two witnesses so far who say the tape was indeed not rewound and that it was very upsetting to the owner of the tape. Again, if true, this is troubling – clearly not the kind of integrity you want to see in a Supreme Court justice.

Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it.

The same neighbor also dropped a bombshell allegation about the drinking problem of Amy Coney Barrett and her closest friends. Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it. The neighbor says she "frequently" witnessed Coney-Barrett and her friends chugging entire cartons of milk – often Whole Milk, sometimes Chocolate Milk, occasionally both at the same time through a funnel.

Unfortunately, shooting-up cooties, injurious rewinding, and potential calcium-abuse are not even the worst of it.

A third person has now come forward, another man, and this is just reprehensible, it's hard to even fathom. But he alleges that in fourth grade, when they were around ten-years-old, Amy Coney Barrett and a group of "four or five of her friends" gang-GRAPED him on the playground during recess. He alleges the group of friends snuck uneaten grapes out of the cafeteria and gang-GRAPED him repeatedly in broad daylight. In other words, and I hate to have to spell this out because it's kind of graphic, but the group led by ten-year-old Amy Coney Barrett pelted this poor defenseless boy with whole grapes. He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

Obviously, even if just one of these allegations is half-true, no Senator with a conscience could possibly vote to confirm Coney Barrett. When there is a clear pattern of destructive childhood behavior, it always continues into adulthood. Because people do not change. Ever.

Fortunately, for the sake of the Republic, Democrats plan to subpoena Coney Barrett's childhood diary, to see what, if any, insights it may provide into her calcium habits, as well as her abuse of illicit cooties and the gang-GRAPING incident.

We will keep you posted on the latest, but for now, it looks like Democrats will find plenty in the reckless pre-teen life of Amy Coney Barrett to cast doubt on her nomination. And if not, they can always fall back on her deranged preference for letting babies be born.

[NOTE: The preceding was a parody written by MRA writer Nathan Nipper.]