Glenn vs. Tania

GLENN: I last night had the most bizarre argument with my wife at 11:00 at night. And I just said to her, you are seriously not having this argument with me. And here it is. That hot babe with the Jets, my wife was actually saying, "Well, she deserved it." I said, what?

PAT: She deserved it?

GLENN: Well, she didn't say she deserved it. She said she's stupid.

PAT: Well, okay.

GLENN: And I said

PAT: And what was your problem with that?

GLENN: Well, I don't know. I've never talked to this really hot sports reporter.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: But how is she stupid exactly? And she said, look at the way she's dressed. And I said, oh, don't, really don't go down this road. Look at the way she's dressed? And she said, yes. You don't go

PAT: Into a locker room of football, NFL football players dressed like that? I agree with that.

GLENN: Tania, is that you?

PAT: I agree with that.

GLENN: Really, do you?

PAT: I agree with that.

STU: You've gotten much, much uglier, Tania.

GLENN: So in other words, this is my wife's point. Guys are visual and you are going into a locker room with a bunch of football players. So we have a lower standard? Or are you just saying that it is are we not judging people by the content of their character but by their job status?

PAT: No.

GLENN: Or by what? What are we

PAT: First of all we have to define what's harassment?

GLENN: No, no, no. No, no.

PAT: First of all she said she didn't even notice anything wrong.

GLENN: We didn't even get there. We didn't even get there. And my wife was saying she's visual men are visual. And I said, oh, thank goodness, honey, I hope I don't walk by a hooker who's really hot today because I'm visual and I just won't be able to contain myself.

STU: This is a great excuse for you. You can do whatever you want.

GLENN: I know.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: I kept making her point. I said, oh, my goodness, thank you, honey, for permission. She said, well, not you. And I said, why? Are guys different? Do we hold people to different standards? Or do we say there's one standard? I don't care if you're a football player or who you are, you don't do that.

PAT: What happened?

GLENN: they're throwing footballs at her? I mean, that's not harassment.

PAT: That's not. And they weren't throwing them at her. They were throwing them toward her.

STU: So they could look at her.

PAT: You know, so probably the wide receiver could get over there and take a look at her and then

GLENN: I mean, may I?

STU: That's not a criminal act.

PAT: That's not a criminal act.

GLENN: That is not a criminal act.

PAT: Harassment. That's not a criminal act.

GLENN: Almost let me just say something. I saw the picture of her yesterday like 4,000 times.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: And I think there is magnets in her pants and steel in my eyes because

STU: It's hard not to look at certain areas.

GLENN: It is hard not to look.

STU: Yes.

GLENN: It could be the magnet thing or I was just weak and pathetic. But so you can understand it, but that is a man. That's the part you're supposed to overcome. That's the natural man part of you.

STU: Right.

GLENN: True.

STU: I mean, there's a huge line here between harassment and noticing.

PAT: Right.

STU: And you know what? Every time, you know, you drive by someone who looks attractive and you might slow down and look?

GLENN: For instance

STU: You could get to any ridiculous extent of that.

GLENN: For instance, here's the thing. When I first saw her picture on TV, I mean, I was like, holy cow, that's a nice photograph. Then

STU: That's not what you said.

GLENN: Every time

PAT: You were admiring the photograph?

GLENN: Yes, I was. It's an art thing. But anyway, so

PAT: So you're wondering who took the picture.

GLENN: So I was wondering who took that. That is very nice framing.

PAT: Mmm hmmm.

GLENN: So I am looking at that and I, of course, have the natural man thought. Now, the rest of the time that it comes on TV, I try to avoid it. And then when I do see on TV, I'm thinking, I know why this is on TV.

STU: I didn't try to avoid it at all because it's part of the story, Glenn. You have to understand that this is a photo she released in her own defense. And if you don't examine the photo, you are not acknowledging her evidence, her backup or her side of the story.

GLENN: This is part of these, the argument that my wife and I had. She said, why would she release these photos of her? And I said, what part of her outfit, her shoulders are covered, she's wearing long pants. Granted, they are very, very tight pants.

STU: They that is a complete understatement. They could not possibly be tighter than they are.

GLENN: I think I could challenge that.

STU: I disagree. I don't think it's possible. I don't think it's possible for them to be tighter.

GLENN: We could ask her to try on the size smaller.

STU: There's no way she could get in. She would get in up to her calves and she would give up. She would give up with hopeless

GLENN: This is where you go. This is where you go. Now, all right. So I said to her also, I said, honey, have you ever watched Telemundo? She's a Spanish reporter, right?

PAT: Azteca or something, TV Azteca?

GLENN: For Mexico TV?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Have you ever watched Mexican TV?

STU: Well

GLENN: Yes. Every

STU: Every man in America.

GLENN: Do you speak Spanish?

STU: I do not, no.

GLENN: Neither do I. I've watched Telemundo, okay? Every guy, you know, will pretend that we're watching it, try to figure out what's going on. No, we're not. They're all hot and scantily clad. I mean, this is the way it is. So it's part of her job. If she's not looking and dressing like that, she's not going to be on

STU: She advertises herself as the hottest

GLENN: She's on Mexican television.

STU: Yes. But for her to advertise herself as the hottest sports reporter in America and then act shocked when people think she's hot, I mean, she's defined herself as hot!

GLENN: No. Wait, wait.

PAT: But this is the key to the argument and we should come back and talk about it because we're out of time, but I think that is the key.

GLENN: That is the key to the argument.

STU: It doesn't excuse the excuse.

GLENN: Yes.

STU: They say Pat calls

PAT: There doesn't seem to be abuse in this case.

GLENN: I agree with you.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: I agree with you. But let's not also, let's not excuse, somebody comes in dressing inappropriately or whatever as, guys, you don't become pigs.

STU: No. Of course not.

PAT: No.

STU: Don't excuse it.

PAT: But when you walk into an NFL locker room, guys are in their towels or, you know, some of them probably naked.

STU: And who's getting harassed there? They're naked.

PAT: Yeah.

STU: Why do they have to be interviewed by a woman.

GLENN: Hold on just a second. Hold on just a second.

STU: Sorry.

GLENN: Dom, can you put the picture back up? Because that's a new picture. I haven't seen it.

PAT: Oh, my gosh.

GLENN: The new picture.

PAT: I didn't know we could do that.

GLENN: Now look at the framing on that.

PAT: Now see, for those not watching on the Insiders, which is 99.9%. Insider Extreme.

GLENN: Holy

STU: Is that a catcall? Did you just make a catcall?

PAT: There is a photo of her now and you are not even in the locker room naked and she's flashed on the screen in the studio.

GLENN: So me being in the locker room naked

PAT: And you're making explanations.

GLENN: Wait a minute, wait a minute. It would be okay for me to make these comments?

PAT: Is it okay? No. But you are probably going to make some sort of exclamation. These are NFL football players and they are going to

GLENN: Okay. So we have a lower standard. I just want to make sure. We have a lower standard of ethics for NFL football players.

PAT: No. But there is a higher standard for harassment. I'm sorry if you're embarrassed. Don't go into a men's locker room. If you don't want to be embarrassed, don't go in there and interview superstars.

GLENN: Dom, for the love of Pete, take the picture off the Insider Extreme. I can't I'm surrounded by monitors, please.

STU: I'm being deluged with photos from everyone I know right now of this. This is not what I need in the middle of a broadcast. I don't know what you guys said for the last three minutes. I have absolutely no idea.

GLENN: See, that's what it is.

STU: This is a problem.

GLENN: My wife is right about guys being visual, but that doesn't excuse us.

STU: You are the one doing catcalls.

GLENN: I mean, unless it does, honey.

[NOTE: Transcript may have been edited to enhance readability - audio archive includes full segment as it was originally aired]

This MUST be why Trump (allegedly) had NUCLEAR documents at Mar-a-Lago

Photo by (Left) Win McNamee/ (Right) Bettmann /Contributor/Getty Images

According to the Washington Post's "anonymous sources," the FBI was looking for documents related to nuclear weapons during its raid of Mar-a-Lago.

Who could have guessed what Donald Trump did with those documents (never mind that he allegedly had them for over a year before the FBI actually did anything)? And who knows why they were searching through Melania's drawers for such top-secret information? Also, isn't it interesting that even after both Attorney General Merrick Garland and Donald Trump asked for the search warrant to be unsealed, only this very unspecific and very damning bit of information was "leaked" to the Washington Post? And just a few months before the midterm elections?

Since the DOJ still hasn't told us much (what was leaked to the media), Glenn did his best to present a few "theories" of his own on "The Glenn Beck Program" Friday. Watch the video clip below to hear more from "The Glenn Beck Program." Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

New details emerge about Trump raid — and 'it doesn't look good for the FBI'

Photo by Eva Marie Uzcategui/Getty Images

New, alleged details about the raid of former President Donald Trump's home at Mar-a-Lago hint that it's "not looking good for the FBI," said BlazeTV host Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday.

Trump has faced attacks from every direction, but despite all of it, he has "not been found guilty or had any kind of real, solid evidence against him," Glenn pointed out.

Glenn detailed a long list of investigations, accusations, and lawsuits against Trump, and the latest puzzling revelations about the FBI's raid of Mar-a-Lago, which only seem to raise even more questions. For example, did agents truly refuse to give Trump's lawyer a copy of the warrant upon arriving at the home? Because sources have alleged that his attorney was kept "10 feet away from the warrant" and was not allowed to actually read it. If that's true, then it was absolutely against the law.

Then there was the inordinate amount of time spent going through Melania Trump's closet. And did they have the proper authority to break into Trump's safe?

"That warrant had better damn well say that they can break into that safe because the law is, you can't go into somebody's house and ... just tear it all apart," Glenn said. "You have to have a pretty good idea of where things might be located, and you ask for permission for those areas. And you have to know exactly what you're looking for, and if it's in a safe, you need to specifically say, 'it's in a safe and we're having a safe cracker come in.' If they didn't say in the warrant that they could crack his safe, it's the fruit of the poisoned tree. By the way, there was nothing in the safe."

Glenn also explained that the FBI broke into a specific "safe room" that contained national archives, which Trump was allegedly told by investigators to keep in a locked room.

"[Trump] made a safe room, and put two locks on it, at their request. And that's what they broke into," Glenn said. "This doesn't look good for the FBI," he added.

Watch the video clip below to hear more from "The Glenn Beck Program." Can't watch? Download the podcast here.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

There’s an economic axis of evil taking shape right now, and the people in charge of our government are too stupid to acknowledge and deal with what’s happening. The U.S. dollar and the entire financial system are at stake, and, as Glenn Beck reveals on "Glenn TV" Wednesday, our enemies’ PUBLISHED plans to take the entire thing down.

While all of this is happening, our own leaders are making everything worse. We’ve got Nancy Pelosi risking an international incident, accelerating China’s plans to collapse us. And when Biden SHOULD be focusing on the security of our country, he’s instead preoccupied with controlling the weather with his Inflation "Reduction" Act.

Glenn exposes the TRUE numbers on what that bill will do to your family’s budget. Add to that, they’re more than doubling the IRS to make sure you feel the pain. And if you think they won’t come for you, look at what they just did to the former president of the United States. The DOJ and FBI just went after the political opponent of their boss, Joe Biden.

This is what they are focused on, and the threat to the dollar — and the entire financial system — isn’t even on their radar. Pain is coming for us, and they don’t care one bit.

Watch the full episode below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Speaking before signing the “PACT Act of 2022” on Wednesday morning, President Joe Biden claimed that his wonderful economic plan "is working" and that somehow July’s annual inflation rate of 8.5% was actually “zero.”

“I just want to say a number: zero. Today we received news that our economy had 0% inflation in the month of July,” Biden said during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre dutifully echoed the president's not-at-all misleading claim:

The truth of the matter is that last month's inflation rate of 8.5% was a (small) step in the right direction, but only because it was lower than June's 41-year high of 9.1% — and the thing is, anyone who's graduated kindergarten knows it.

So, who do White House personnel think they're fooling? On the radio program Wednesday, Glenn Beck and producer Stu Burguiere broke down how the Biden administration came to this latest disingenuous conclusion about the economy, what the latest consumer price index actually shows, and why the inevitable Biden brag-fest will be unbearable.

Watch the video clip below. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.