Obama supporting counter 8/28 rally

Glenn Beck is seen here on GlennBeck.TV, a feature available exclusively

to Glenn Beck Insider Extreme members.

Learn more...

GLENN: Okay.

Attempting to overtake the popularity of Glenn Beck's 8/28

rally, a group of about 300 liberal and progressive organizations have planned a

rally on the national mall. Is it this weekend? Yeah. It's 10‑2‑10, isn't it?

PAT: Yes, it is.

GLENN: According to two new reports, Saturday's 10‑2 march, one nation working

together, also has garnered support of President Obama's political organizing

group, as well as multiple churches. As the Hill reports, the Democratic

National Committee's Organizing For America, which is the President's,

Organizing For America, which works to support and build off Obama's policies

sent out an e‑mail blast supporting ‑‑

(Audio.)

GLENN: Can you maybe give me a second here? Thank you, Pat.

PAT: I was just making sure I have it.

GLENN: No. It's good. Usually what you should do is check that off line, but

that's what the professionals do.

STU: You talk on mike. You don't play audio when trying not to. Do we have our

roles down here?

PAT: Come on. We're all waiting for it.

GLENN: The Democratic National Committee's Organizing For America which works to

support and build off Obama's policies sent out an e‑mail blast. The message

bills the event as the biggest progressive demonstration in decades. A video

posted on OFA's website may offer a glimpse in what the event might look like,

an election rallying touting Democrats successes over the last two years while

villainizing the Republicans and here's what the President said.

OBAMA: ‑‑ all across the country and the other side is not fighting back. You've

seen special interests align with the Republican party all across the country

and they are now spending millions of dollars all across the country against

democratic candidates, running tremendously negative ads and the worst about

part about it is we don't know exactly who these groups are because of a Supreme

Court decision called citizens united.

PAT: Unbelievable.

OBAMA: You now have a situation in which special interests can get millions of

dollars in contributions from some of the wealthiest, most powerful interests in

the group.

GLENN: Like Indians.

OBAMA: They don't have to disclose who they are.




8.28.10 The Documentary premiering on Wednesday, September 29th

exclusively on the Insider Extreme. Not an Insider Extreme member?

Sign-up now...

PAT: George Soros.

OBAMA: ‑‑ and so all of our candidates are getting swamped. Now, given what's at

stake, given the fact that the other side has said they want to go back to the

exact same agenda that was in place before I took office, having taxes for

millionaires and billion heirs even if it adds to our deficit, letting corporate

special interests write their own rules, because they want to go back to that

agenda, we know that we're going to have to make sure we do well in this

election and we are fighting or as candidates as strongly as you fought for me.

PAT: Because he only had a billion dollars, he only spent $1 billion and we know

where every penny came from.

GLENN: Well, we do and, you know, when he talks about, you know, you don't want

to right special interest groups just writing legislation, he knows what he's

talking about because we've seen the damage that special interest groups

bypassing Congress and just writing their own legislation ‑‑

PAT: You don't mean like the Apollo Project?

GLENN: Or citizens for American progress, none of those.

PAT: No.

GLENN: SEIU?

PAT: No.

GLENN: Not at all. OFA is not alone supporting the rally. Among those who have

decided to sponsor the rally are multiple church groups, according to the New

York Times. The march is cosponsored by the United Methodist Church, the United

Church of Christ, which is what's his name, Jeremiah Wright's church.

PAT: Jeremiah Wright.

GLENN: The National Baptist Convention and several Jewish organizations. As

people of faith, we deeply care about the issues of justice, education, and jobs

and we feel those are ‑‑ those issues facing society we have to address. This is

according to the United Methodist Church. A march like this is something that

hasn't been accomplished since Dr. King brought people together in 1963 around

issues of race, war, class, and the right to decent paying, good jobs.

PAT: The right again, the right to good jobs.

GLENN: So, we know what they're doing. They are ‑‑ they are organizing for their

version of America. They are pulling out all the stops. This is truly, truly

Astroturf. You can't get people to come to the mall and organizing something in

six weeks. You can't do it. If this ‑‑ these 300 organizations, which include

all of the labor unions, which includes gigantic churches and church

organizations, we had individual churches that decided that they wanted to, you

know, come or individual pastors, but we didn't have ‑‑ we didn't have the

United Methodist Church saying, we're are the buses, let's go, all of our

churches. We didn't have that. And we also didn't have a political message. The

message was about God. The message was the 40 day and 40 night challenge. The

message was you are better people than this.

I believe that we have done something that no one has done since Martin Luther

King, but you'll notice that they themselves now are imaging themselves as

Martin Luther King. I had to make sure that I was saying the whole time, I'm not

Martin Luther King, don't claim to be Martin Luther King. They are now claiming

to be Martin Luther King and his march. And it is all about power, money, and

politics. If there aren't 2 million people there on the mall, I would be shocked

because they know how much is at stake. They know what that crowd needs to ‑‑

photographs. They know what that crowd needs to look like.

PAT: And like you said, they've got every union, they've got every church group,

they've got the office of the presidency of the United States behind this thing.

This is ‑‑ I mean, if you can't ‑‑ you've got to get 2 million people there.

With all of this power behind them and organizing ability, they ‑‑ I mean, they

proved in 2008 they know how to organize.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: Then ‑‑

GLENN: And they will. And their crowd will ‑‑ it has to be 2 million people. It

has to be 2 million people. I would have a little more confidence in 2 million

if I knew they didn't have the power of MSNBC behind them. You know, I think

once you have the power of MSNBC ‑‑

PAT: Then you diminish that to about ‑‑

GLENN: You diminish ‑‑

PAT: ‑‑ maybe 1 million. MSNBC cuts it in half.

GLENN: I'm not really sure.

PAT: I don't know. We'll see.

GLENN: So, you have this weekend the anti‑8/28 rally. We saw the pictures of the

crowd and this isn't about numbers. This is about the spirit of the crowd, what

happens, what happens on stage. How is it reviewed? How is it covered? What is

said? And I will tell you, I support their right to gather. I support their

right to stand and be heard. I support their right to let people hear and see

who they are. That's all I asked. All I asked for was we have a right to be

heard, we have a right to stand, we have a right to have people hear us. And

that's all they're doing and they have that right and we as citizens have the

responsibility to listen and then choose.

I find it interesting that Stephen Colbert, in part of the story that nobody has

covered, do you know who set that up, who set up the whole Stephen Colbert

incident in Congress and on the fields? Do you know, Stu?

STU: Only because you e‑mailed it to me this morning.

GLENN: It was the farm workers union.

STU: It's unbelievable.

GLENN: Yeah. It was the farm workers union that put this whole thing together

and had Stephen Colbert come out and work on the farm and then go to Congress.

The unions are knee‑deep in all of this and I don't know how all this shakes

out. I don't know and I don't claim to be the one who is left standing in the

end. Here's what I do claim. I believe that those who play these games at this

point, who are not honest, who are in bed with the special interests or in bed

with what America knows is wrong, they will go the way of Oprah Winfrey. A lot

of people will say, oh, Oprah cashed out and got a lot of money, yeah, she did,

but Oprah was losing to Judge Judy in the end and I believe that not because

she, you know, ate up all of her time and, you know, her 15 minutes or 1500

hours of fame was over. I believe it happened because she got involved in

politics and everything else and people didn't like what she had to say. She

forced them to choose and she got into something that wasn't her realm. Colbert

and what's his name, Stewart, are doing the same thing now. And I don't know if

these are the event that will do it to them, with you I will tell you that

Stephen Colbert, I felt bad for him because I think he was set up but he also

choose and he knew he was getting in bed with the unions and was being ‑‑ he's a

shill. That's all he is is a shill and the America people are done with it.

Everything that is establishment ‑‑ I'm going to go into this tomorrow a little

bit. Everything that is the establishment will be over. It will come to an end.

Now, it will either be a smaller government and ruling themselves or it will be

a global establishment in the end. That will be for the American people and only

the American people to decide.

Legal scholar and famed criminal defense attorney Alan Dershowitz has a message for partisans dividing America: "A plague on both your houses." He voted for Hillary Clinton. He endorsed Joe Biden. He's a man who is basically the Forrest Gump of American judicial history.

Look up a big court case over the past few decades, and you'll probably see him standing in the background. He's represented notorious clients like Mike Tyson, Patty Hearst, Harry Reems, Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, and yes, Donald Trump. It's made him a target for both the left and right.

Alan also describes himself as a "civil libertarian," and that's probably why he and Glenn Beck get along despite their opposing political views. His story is like a history lesson, spanning half a century, and it just might be the key to bridging the political divide.

On this week's podcast, Alan explained that while he's a strong defender of the Constitution, he's never been a big fan of the Second Amendment. In the past he's called it absurd and outdated, and even today, he admits that he wouldn't have ingrained it into our Constitution if he was a framer. However, with the whole Bill of Rights under attack, he's now fully in defense of our right to bear arms. Because if the Second Amendment changes, any amendment could be next.

"I'm now a supporter of the Second Amendment. I don't want to change it. I don't want to change one word of it, because I'm afraid that if I get to change the Second Amendment, other people will get to change the First Amendment, and the Fifth Amendment," Alan said. "So, I am committed to preserving the Bill of Rights, every single word, every comma, and every space between the words."

Watch a clip from the full interview with Alan Dershowitz below:

Watch the full podcast below, on Glenn's YouTube channel, or on Blaze Media's podcast network.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Investigative reporter David Steinberg joined the radio program Monday, to explain how a new video may provide enough evidence to begin a FBI investigation into alleged illegal practices by Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar's campaign.

In the video, which was produced and released by Project Veritas, residents of Omar's community describe campaign teams that not only conduct illegal ballot harvesting practices but also pay people for their blank absentee ballots.

Steinberg told Glenn that, if these charges prove to be true, the federal government could bypass Omar's friend and protector, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison. Could 2020 be the beginning of the end for Omar's political career?

Watch the video below to catch Glenn's conversation with David Steinberg:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Mike Fratantuono is the manager of Sunset Restaurant in Glen Burnie, Maryland. He wrote in the Washington Post's COVID-19 series about the recent, heartbreaking loss of his business, a restaurant that has been in his family for "four generations and counting."

"I know this virus is real, okay? It's real and it's awful. I'm not disputing any of that," Mike wrote. "But our national hysteria is worse. We allowed the virus to take over our economy, our small businesses, our schools, our social lives, our whole quality of life. We surrendered, and now everything is infected."

On the radio program Monday, Glenn Beck reacted to Mike's letter, which he shared in full, adding his hope that those in government are ultimately held responsible for what he called the biggest theft of the Western world.

"This is the biggest theft of, not only money, but of heritage and of hope," Glenn said. "The United States government and many of the states are responsible for this, not you. And hopefully someday soon, we'll return to some semblance of sanity, and those responsible for this theft, this rape of the Western world, will be held responsible."

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

We did our homework over the weekend; we did the research so we can tell you what is likely coming from Senate Democrats regarding President Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett. Based on our research and the anonymous people who have already come forward to talk about Coney Barrett's youth, these are the main shocking things you can expect Senate Democrats to seize on during the confirmation process…

A man has come forward under the banner of "#MenToo," to say that in second grade, Amy Coney Barrett and her best friend at the time, cornered him at a birthday party at Chuck-E-Cheese and "injected him with a full dose of cooties." Which, if true, would obviously be disqualifying for serving on the highest court in the land.

Then there's a woman who says when she was nine-years-old, she lived on the same street as Amy Coney Barrett. She alleges that Coney-Barrett borrowed her VHS tape of Herbie Goes Bananas and did not return it for at least six months. And then when she did finally get the tape back, the woman says Coney Barrett did not even bother to rewind it. The FBI has interviewed at least two witnesses so far who say the tape was indeed not rewound and that it was very upsetting to the owner of the tape. Again, if true, this is troubling – clearly not the kind of integrity you want to see in a Supreme Court justice.

Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it.

The same neighbor also dropped a bombshell allegation about the drinking problem of Amy Coney Barrett and her closest friends. Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it. The neighbor says she "frequently" witnessed Coney-Barrett and her friends chugging entire cartons of milk – often Whole Milk, sometimes Chocolate Milk, occasionally both at the same time through a funnel.

Unfortunately, shooting-up cooties, injurious rewinding, and potential calcium-abuse are not even the worst of it.

A third person has now come forward, another man, and this is just reprehensible, it's hard to even fathom. But he alleges that in fourth grade, when they were around ten-years-old, Amy Coney Barrett and a group of "four or five of her friends" gang-GRAPED him on the playground during recess. He alleges the group of friends snuck uneaten grapes out of the cafeteria and gang-GRAPED him repeatedly in broad daylight. In other words, and I hate to have to spell this out because it's kind of graphic, but the group led by ten-year-old Amy Coney Barrett pelted this poor defenseless boy with whole grapes. He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

Obviously, even if just one of these allegations is half-true, no Senator with a conscience could possibly vote to confirm Coney Barrett. When there is a clear pattern of destructive childhood behavior, it always continues into adulthood. Because people do not change. Ever.

Fortunately, for the sake of the Republic, Democrats plan to subpoena Coney Barrett's childhood diary, to see what, if any, insights it may provide into her calcium habits, as well as her abuse of illicit cooties and the gang-GRAPING incident.

We will keep you posted on the latest, but for now, it looks like Democrats will find plenty in the reckless pre-teen life of Amy Coney Barrett to cast doubt on her nomination. And if not, they can always fall back on her deranged preference for letting babies be born.

[NOTE: The preceding was a parody written by MRA writer Nathan Nipper.]