Maher: No such thing as extremism

Glenn Beck is seen here on GlennBeck.TV, a feature available exclusively to Glenn Beck Insider Extreme members. Learn more...

GLENN: Last night on Bill O'Reilly, what's his name, one of the more despicable human beings alive, I think the

STU: Alan Grayson?

GLENN: No. I said one of, not the.

STU: Not the? Okay, I'm sorry.

GLENN: A guy who is just so far out of step with the mainstream and so angry and bitter and

STU: Alan Grayson?

GLENN: No, he's the.

STU: Oh, okay.

PAT: This guy might be second.

GLENN: I think maybe, maybe.

PAT: Any other ideas? Who might be second, most despicable?

GLENN: Well, almost everybody on MSNBC.

PAT: Well, that's true.

STU: Someone who works for Alan Grayson?

PAT: Well, kind of.

GLENN: Bill Maher. Bill Maher.

PAT: I think his employer might be Beelzebub actually, it might be.


PAT: No.

GLENN: Oh, the one that actually

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Okay. Here's Bill Maher on O'Reilly last night.

Bill Maher on O'Reilly

'Real Time' host spars with O'Reilly over Obama's troubles, conservatives and political extremism

MAHER: There really isn't extremism on both sides. That's a canard.

O'REILLY: There's isn't? There is no extremism on the left?

MAHER: There's not that much extrem There is some but not nothing to talk about. Not really. There's no movement.

PAT: Oh. That's a canard. I chortle over the canard that there's extremism pointing to the left. Show me how we chortle together over that?

GLENN: Yes, yes. Yes. Extremism?

PAT: What?

GLENN: I was just talking about, to my friends at the New party just the other day about the lack of extremism.

PAT: I was blogging at CP USA last night...

GLENN: Okay. Here is a story from, a story I don't think you are going to find any place else. On September 24th, about 20 FBI agents spent most of the day searching the Logan Square residence of Chicago activist Stephanie Weiner and her husband Joseph Losbaker, this according to the Chicago Tribune.

STU: Is there no there's no relation to Weiner Weiner, right? Like when you said

GLENN: I think all Weiners are a Weiner is a Weiner.

STU: The Weiner, you know, the Weiner, the Goldline Weiner guy,, that guy, that's not would cover this Weiner? I think they would. They may.


PAT: Should cover all Weiners, shouldn't it?

STU: This is Weiner based information.

GLENN: This really doesn't, this one doesn't play the Bill Maher thing again? What did he say? Bill Maher, I love it, toast points.

MAHER: There really isn't extremism on both sides. That's a canard.

O'REILLY: There's isn't? There is no extremism on the left?

MAHER: There's not that much extrem There is some but not nothing to talk about. Not really. There's no movement.

GLENN: All right. So anyway, there's no movement here, and this extremism really isn't worth talking about, and that's why the press isn't talking about it. The FBI agent spent most of the day searching the Logan Square residence of the Chicago activist. In 1998 the duo worked as leaders of the Chicago New Party.

STU: I've heard of them.

GLENN: You have?

STU: Yeah, I remember

GLENN: Why would you?

STU: In one particular incidence.

PAT: Remember.

STU: There was a guy who was endorsed by them and worked closely with them.

GLENN: Yeah, yeah.

STU: In a town, the second city?

GLENN: Yeah, they're progressives, progressives in Chicago.

STU: Oh, Chicago? Yeah, it was Chicago.

GLENN: In Chicago, and the New Party there was, well, one of the guys who was, you know, part of the New Party was okay, sure, it was Barack Obama. But also they were endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America.

STU: That's interesting.

GLENN: So we have the Democratic Socialists of America, and they were the ones that really got Project Vote together. Project Vote, wait a minute. That was Barack Obama, too.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: Hmmm.

GLENN: Anyway, they're just

STU: No movement.

GLENN: The FBI just spent the day with them because there was some there were some problems there with the completely unorganized, no really anything to see here or to talk about here. There's no real problem at all.

STU: No, and there's

GLENN: It's just the FBI.

STU: There's no organized effort I mean, you know, there's not like there's groups named A LF and ELF. Like those groups don't exist obviously.

PAT: There's no rioting at G8 or G20 meetings.

STU: No. And it's not like in Europe there were 39 time the amount of terrorist attacks from the leftwing than the rightwing.

PAT: From the left. I mean, that's a canard.

STU: What a canard that was.

GLENN: What a toast point. The New Party is an electoral alliance dedicated to electing leftist candidates to office, usually through the Democratic Party. It was dissolved in 1998. The three organizations formed the backbone of the New Party, the Democratic Socialists of America, the U.S.' largest Marxist organization; ACORN, radical labor union; SEIU were also involved. But also heavily involved was, oh, the Communist Party USA.

PAT: Hmmm.

GLENN: So it's not like there is an organization you know what's really weird? Do you have the guy from the Communications Worker of America, the labor union for the broadcast industry, CWA? Here's the vice president, and he said some really interesting things. There's really nothing. But again, listen to Bill Maher, there's really nothing to talk about. That is a canard. I want you to listen carefully to what the labor union of CWA said about what's happening this weekend in Washington. In Washington they have the 10/2/10 march, and I urge you to watch it. I'm urging Fox I don't know if they will, but I'm urging Fox, please cover this rally. Cover it. It's more important they didn't cover 8/28. I mean, they covered it as news. I mean run the whole thing. Cover this rally. Americans need to see it and hear it and listen to it. But you're going to you have to listen with different ears. You cannot be like the press and the left was. The press and the left did not understand the language of what was being said on the stage. That's why Time magazine reported that Glenn Beck didn't have anything to say. He called all these people together and then he didn't have anything to say. Because they don't understand the language of God. They don't understand the language of hope, faith, of real charity. They don't get that. They don't understand the language of the heartland of America and so they dismiss it. You don't understand the message of Madison, Wisconsin. You need to learn it. You don't understand the language of the New Party. You need to learn it. The language of the Democratic Socialists of America, you need to learn it. Because I guarantee things will be said that we will dismiss that shouldn't be dismissed. It's a different language. Listen to how this has been spun. Here is the labor union vice president of the communications workers of America.

VOICE: One nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all are words that we recite when we recite the "Pledge of Allegiance" to our flag. Those are not just words, however. They are ideals that the American people have lived by since the creation of this country. They are ideals that for too long now have been attacked by the antigovernment crazies and the Sarah Palins and the Glenn Becks and the racists and the haters of this country and the people of this country. And the One Nation movement is a movement that has now decided that we should bring together coalitions that have not existed since the 1960s in this country, coalitions that when they existed, changed this country. And we are going to change this country again. We are going to do that because the majority of people in this country do not believe in the haters, do not believe in the antigovernment crazies, do not believe in the tea party, do not believe in the Glenn Becks, do not believe in the Sarah Palins.

GLENN: Okay. One more thing. America is at a crossroads, and you have to vote. But more importantly, you have to decide I've been saying this for two years. If you didn't believe me before, please, if I have an ounce of credibility with you, please, I'm begging you, rent the movie Gandhi today. Please watch it over the weekend. Please go to your church and listen to the spirit. Be a life preserver. Put on the armor of God. You must have it. If you think that this is just a rally and it's no big deal, it's just labor unions and let me give you this: This is coming now from Danny Glover: I'm proud and excited to be part of One Nation Working Together, exciting news, says the organizers of One Nation. That is the event that's happening this weekend. We are thrilled that Danny Glover will be participating.

Now, so you know, Danny Glover, we know that he is a leftist, right? But how left? You know you remember in 2004 he endorsed the anti Bush team protest at the Republican National Convention in New York. It was organized by Not In Our Name, an organization closely associated with anticapitalism and Maoist revolutionaries and the Communist Party. Four years ago Maoist revolutionaries sounded like a joke. That is who is in our White House administration: Maoist revolutionaries.

He is also a good friend of Hugo Chavez, he also signed a statement circulated by the Partisan Defense Committee calling for the release of convicted killer Mumia Abu Jamal who, by the way, serves on the national executive committee for the National Lawyers Guild. Glover also joined with a bunch of other people initiating a group called Progressives For Obama.

Do you see the layers of the onion? First, the first layer is they are Democrats. Now, the next layer that you have to get through is they are just liberals. The next layer is they are progressives. The next layer on that one is they're socialists. Then they're communists. Then they're Maoists. Then they're revolutionaries. I don't know if we've gotten to the center. But you must not it is what the progressives or the liberals, as we used to call them, do. They cover their identity. They change words to make them correct and politically correct, politically acceptable. It is an old communist trick. It's time to stop playing that game, period. You break, break with the system and spit yourself out of the system. You must be totally different. And do not play the game that they are expecting you to play. If you do these things and you vote and you unite, look at who they're uniting with. All kinds of people. If you don't stand together, if they allow to separate us, they have the structure now in place and they have Cass Sunstein who will do it. Mark my words, he will do it. They will shut this place down tighter than a drum. It takes the majority of Americans standing arm in arm and knowing who they are through education, knowing who they are, knowing who we are, knowing what our Constitution says. Not being sheep, not being afraid, not being afraid to lose everything financially, not being afraid to lose your own life. But you stand there linked arm in arm in peace, and you will win. I promise you.

How prepared are YOU to weather a future crisis? We recently published a brand new quiz so you can find out exactly how prepared you are. Whether you're a "prepper" with a bunker fit for the apocolypse or just want to feel more secure for the future, there is always something more to learn. That's why Glenn wants to give his newsletter subscribers his "Ultimate Preparation Guide," filled with practical tips for building a solid foundation to weather future crises. And let's face it—in our crazy world right now, who couldn't use a bit more peace of mind?

Enter your email below to get "Glenn's Ultimate Preparation Guide" sent straight to your inbox!

Editor's Note: Arizona House Bill HB2770 has since been shut down! AZ Rep. Rachel Jones tweeted that the AZ Freedom Caucus shut down the bill before it could reach the board. It is encouraging to see states stepping to protect the American people from getting one step closer to a Central Bank Digital Currency. Hopefully, Arizona will be a precedent for the other states!

On today's radio broadcast, Glenn warned about dangerous Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) language being smuggled into routine legislation in REPUBLICAN-led states. This is unacceptable, and as Glenn said, we can't let this legislation pass as it now stands.

The legislation being used to smuggle in this CBDC language is the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), a routine piece of legislation passed on the state level that helps standardize commercial and business transactions. However, a new round of UCCs being deliberated RIGHT NOW amongst a swath of Republican-led states anticipate the use of "electronic money." In a public letter sent to the Republican states currently deliberating this legislation, the Pro-Family Legislative Network said this can only refer to the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) under consideration and testing by the Federal Reserve. Biden's Executive Order 14067 issued in March of 2022 started the push for CBDC, and now these states, knowingly or unknowingly, are laying the legislative groundwork for making CBDC a reality.

There is absolutely no reason why Republican-led states should aid in laying the foundation for CBDC, yet 12 of them are deliberating it RIGHT NOW, with one UCC bill already on one GOP governor's desk! We have to act NOW to stop these UCCs in their tracks and demand our lawmakers amend the bills without the "electronic money" language.

If your state is listed below, contact your representative NOW to put an end to CBDC language.

1. North Dakota

North Dakota House Bill HB1082 passed BOTH chambers and is now sitting on Governor Burgum's desk. Burgun has 3 DAYS to veto this bill once it's placed on his desk—if not, it will pass automatically. If you are a North Dakota resident, it is absolutely CRUCIAL that you contact Governor Burgum's office NOW and demand that he veto this bill and re-introduce it without the "electronic money" language.

2. Arizona

Arizona House Bill HB2770 has been SHUT DOWN! See the above editor's note for more details.

Arizona House Bill HB2770 passed the House majority and minority caucuses. Arizona residents, contact your representative's office NOW so that they amend this bill without the "electronic money" language.

3. Arkansas

Arkansas House Bill HB1588 is in committee, and if passed, will head to the House floor. Though the bill is only in its beginning stages, it's important for Arkansas residents to stop this bill in its tracks and amend it without the "electronic money" language.

4. Missouri

Missouri House Bill HB1165 is also in its beginning stages in committee. That means it's important to contact your representative as soon as possible to amend it without the "electronic money" language.

5. Oklahoma

Oklahoma House Bill HB 2776 passed the House Committee and will go to a chamber vote soon. If passed, it will go to the Senate, then the governor's desk. If you are an Indiana resident, contact your representative's office NOW to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

6. Indiana

Indiana Senate Bill SB0486 passed the Senate and is headed to the House. Republicans control Indiana's executive office and BOTH chambers of the legislature. There is no excuse for this bill to pass. If you are an Indiana resident, it's vital you contact your representative NOW and demand they amend this bill without the "electronic money" language.

7. Kentucky

Kentucky Senate Bill SB64 passed the Senate and is now being deliberated in the House. If you live in Kentucky, contact your representative's office to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

8. Montana

Montana Senate Bill SB370 passed the Senate and was sent to the House on March 3rd. If you are a Montana resident, contact your representative's office NOW so that the bill doesn't without changing the "electronic money" language.

9. Nebraska

Nebraska's Legislative Bill LB94 passed committee and the first floor vote. As Nebraska only has one legislative chamber, this bill is dangerously close to passing the legislature and being sent to the governor's desk. If you are a Nebraska resident, contact your representative's office NOW and demand they amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

10. New Hampshire

New Hampshire House Bill HB584 is currently in House committee deliberations and has not yet reached the House floor. If you are a New Hampshire resident, contact your representative's office NOW to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

11. Tennessee

Tennessee House Bill HB0640 didn't successfully pass the House. However, it was deferred to a Senate committee and has now taken the form of Senate Bill SB0479, which is now in committee. This bill is still alive, and it's important for you, Tennessee residents, to stop it before it reaches the floor! Contact your representative to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

12. Texas

Texas House Bill HB5011 was filed and is ready to be taken up by committee. Fellow Texans, let's not let this bill progress any further! Contact your representative and demand they amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

6 things you NEED to know about the Silicon Valley Bank collapse

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

Silicon Valley Bank's collapse is sparking traumatic memories of the 2008 financial crash. Should we be worried SVB is signaling a similar economic catastrophe, or is everyone overreacting to the media's hype? Glenn told his listeners to be "healthily terrified." This event is sure to have ripple effects throughout the economy, but the more you are informed about it, the more you can prepare. Here are 6 things you need to know about Silicon Valley Bank's crash—explained in simple words.

1. The short answer to what happened: SVB didn't have enough money to pay its depositors.

Remember the scene from It's a Wonderful Life when all of the residents make a run on George Bailey's bank demanding their money? Fortunately for them, their money was in the altruistic hands of George Bailey, who used his honeymoon savings to give the depositors the money they demanded.

Silicon Valley Bank's depositors weren't so lucky.

In short, the depositors made a run on Silicon Valley Bank, demanding the withdrawal of their money. But SVB simply didn't have the liquid money available to give their depositors, causing regulators to shut down the bank shortly afterward.

2. It all started with COVID...

Why didn't SVB have enough money for its depositors? To explain this, we have to go back to the pandemic era.

The pandemic saw a rapid decrease in spending and a massive increase in bank deposits. Due to the uncertainty of the future and lockdowns limiting ways to spend money on recreational activities, like restaurants, bars, and other outlets, many Americans stocked up money in their accounts. In fact, SVB's deposits doubled in 2021 alone, bringing in more money than they could lend out to their clients.

To make a return on their available cash, SVB wanted to invest it, as many banks do. Since they had reached their lending limit, they decided to invest it in U.S. Treasury Securities, which are the government's means of funding itself without using taxation (in a nutshell). These are considered "ultra-safe" investments because they are backed by the "full faith and credit of the federal government."

Unlike other forms of investments, investing in Treasuries means the government will do everything within its legal power to pay back the money used to fund itself. In other words, it is typically very safe... so what happened?

3. Then came the magic cocktail—record-high inflation and rising interest rates...

Interest rates ruined the typically "ultra-safe" investment. Due to 40-year record-high inflation, the Fed lifted rates eight times by a total of 4.25 percentage points in 2022, raising interest rates from 0.25 percent to 4.375 percent. This means the value of U.S. Treasuries investments plummeted rapidly. SVB reported that it lost $1.8 billion due to the decreased value of its Treasuries investments after a year of rising interest rates.

This raises the following question: why didn't SVB just weather the storm and wait for interest rates to decrease? There are two issues with this. The first is that, with so many of their assets held up in Treasuries investments, SVB still wouldn't have enough liquid assets to give their depositors during the bank run.

The second issue is that Treasuries investments have a ten-year limit. In 2021 during the Trump administration, interest rates were at an all-time low of 0.125 percent.

The record-fast increase of interest rates in 2022 caused very little chance for rates to go back down to their historic 2021 lows within ten years for banks to make their money back on their investments.

To avoid this, SVB planned to sell their investments at a loss and re-purchase Treasuries investments at the decreased value, giving them an extra ten years to bet on decreased interest rates in the future.

But people caught on to SVB's plan and didn't want to ride with the risk.

4. Account holders withdrew their money... FAST.

As aforementioned, SVP lost $1.8 billion when it sold its depleted Treasuries investments. While they were betting on being able to re-purchase the devalued securities, hoping that they would go up in value in the future with lowered interest rates, investors were worried about the risk.

Once they made the announcement of their $1.8 billion loss, their stocks began to drop, and venture capitalists warned the companies they invest in to pull out of SVB. This had a snowball effect, leading to a "bank run" of depositors demanding to withdraw their money from their SVB accounts.

This led to the perfect storm: SVB's investment losses coupled with the influx of withdrawals were so immense that regulators had to step in and shut the bank down to protect depositors. The government currently "running" SVB, for all practical purposes, is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC closed SVB on Friday and reopened the bank on Monday, March 13th as the Deposit Insurance Bank of Santa Clara.

5. Some people may lose their money. 

Banks insure accounts with $250,000 or less with FDIC insurance. That means, in cases of bank failure, exactly like this one, the FDIC covers all accounts less than $250,000. The FDIC said SVB customers who had less than $250,000 in their accounts will have access to all of their money when the bank reopens. Since it reopened this week, they should have access to their funds.

However, many of SVB's depositors had more than $250,000 in their accounts—it is Silicon Valley after all. Therefore, their accounts were not covered by FDIC insurance. Will they get their money back? There is a chance that they will not.

It is unclear how much SVB currently has to cover uninsured deposits. It is likely not enough. The FDIC has issued a "Receiver's Certificate" to the uninsured account holders with the amount in their account that is not covered by FDIC insurance.

The FDIC said it will pay some of the uninsured deposits by next week by liquidating any additional assets held by SVB. However, if the liquidated assets are not enough, many of SVB's uninsured account holders could lose their money for good.

6. Is this 2008 all over again?

SVB's collapse was the largest bank failure since 2008, when Washington Mutual failed with $307 billion in assets. Its failure, along with the collapse of the Lehman Brother's investment bank, triggered the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Are we in danger of repeating 2008?

Some argue that we are not in danger of another economic catastrophe, simply because SVB holds less than 1 percent of the nation's assets. However, as Glenn warns, there is a danger of banks repeating the same mistakes as SVP.

SVP wasn't the only bank to use its surplus deposits to invest in U.S. Treasuries, which means that other banks are wrestling with the depleted value of their securities investments due to rising interest rates.

Bank of America, for example, lost $109 billion in their securities investments due to rising interest rates, the most among its peers—and Bank of America is no small fish in the ocean of assets.

Other major banks recorded other massive losses in their securities investments due to rising interest rates. JP Morgan Chase lost $36 billion, Wells Fargo lost $41 billion, Citigroup lost $25 billion, and Goldman Sachs lost $1 billion. If the little banks collapse, will they get the same effort and attention from the federal government as the "big guys?"

The critic may argue that these are still small values given the incredibly large amount of assets held in banks nationwide. However, this is missing the point. Major banks have majorly invested in securities since the pandemic-era skyrocketing rate of deposits. Now those investments are depleted in value.

They can either sell those investments at a loss, or they can wait and hope that they will recover over time. However, if those investments are no longer liquid, what happens when their depositors come knocking? Will they have enough liquid assets to cover a massive bank run? These are the lingering questions that our banks need to address.

As Glenn says, this will impact you—it is only a matter of time. What will you do to prepare?

Glenn just purchased the entire historical Roe v. Wade archive as a solemn reminder of our nation's past and the vital importance of honoring the sacredness of life. Since Roe was overturned in 2022, many states have been stepping up to protect both their unborn citizens AND the mothers carrying them.

Which states are doing the most to protect their most vulnerable? Here are the top 12 states with the strictest laws against abortion.

1. Alabama

​Alabama has some of the nation's most protective pro-life measures, banning all abortions in the case of life-threatening circumstances for the mother. That means abortion is banned at every ​stage of pregnancy. Health care providers found guilty of performing abortions face a class-A felony, the most serious charge besides Capitol Murder, with the potential of carrying a life sentence in prison. However, the pill, Plan B, is classified as "contraception" rather than abortion. Taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures except in very limited circumstances.

Alabama is one of the few states to add protections within its state constitution for the unborn. The state:

Acknowledges, declares, and affirms that it is the public policy of this state to recognize and support the sanctity of unborn life and the rights of unborn children, including the right to life.

2. Arkansas

Like Alabama, Arkansas bans abortion at every stage of pregnancy except in life-threatening situations for the mother. However, Plan B is still considered "contraception" and is legal. Taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures except in very limited circumstances. Additionally, Arkansas added the amendment to its state constitution, declaring:

The policy of Arkansas is to protect the life of every unborn child from conception until birth, to the extent permitted by the Federal Constitution.

3. Idaho

Idaho bans abortions at every stage of pregnancy with the exceptions of life-threatening situations to the mother and instances of rape and incest. The health care practitioner who gave an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Patients approved for abortion must wait 24 hours after counseling to receive the procedure. Anyone who performs an abortion unless it's in one of the approved cases will face felony charges. Like Alabama and Arkansas, taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures.

Unlike Alabama and Arkansas, Idaho law does not include explicit constitutional or statutory protections for abortion.

4. Kentucky

Kentucky has also banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy except in life-threatening situations for the mother. There are no exceptions for rape or incest. However, abortion providers are fighting the all-out ban on abortion through appealing to the state's previous abortion ban after six weeks of pregnancy. The appeal is ongoing.

Though Kentucky voters voted down a proposal to add an amendment to the state constitution banning abortion, the state adopted the following policy towards abortion in 2018:

Children, whether born or unborn, are the greatest natural resource in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

5. Louisiana

Louisiana also banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy with no exceptions for rape or incest. However there is an appeal to allow abortions in the case of rape and incest. Healthcare practitioners who violate this ban are subject to criminal prosecution. Moreover, Louisiana adopted an amendment in their state constitution—specifically, the Louisiana Declaration of Rights, banning the construction of any constitutional right to abortion:

To protect human life, nothing in present constitution shall be construed to secure or protect a right to abortion or require the funding of abortion.

6. Mississippi

Mississippi bans all abortions except to save the life of the mother or in cases of rape or incest that have been reported to law enforcement. Though Mississippi did not adopt a constitutional amendment to ban abortion as a right, the Mississippi Code says:

Abortion carries significant physical and psychological risks to the maternal patient, and these physical and psychological risks increase with gestational age.

Moreover, doctors who perform illegal abortions face civil and criminal charges.

7. Missouri

Missouri bans all abortions except in the case of a medical emergency concerning the mother, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Those seeking to get an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Minors seeking an abortion through "affirmative defense" must do so with parental consent. Moreover, those seeking an abortion must be offered an ultrasound.

Moreover, Missouri adopted the following statute protecting the unborn:

It is the intention of the general assembly of the state of Missouri to: (1) [d]efend the right to life of all humans, born and unborn; (2) [d]eclare that the state and all of its political subdivisions are a ‘sanctuary of life’ that protects pregnant women and their unborn children; and (3) [r]egulate abortion to the full extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States, decisions of the United States Supreme Court, and federal statutes.

8. Oklahoma

Oklahoma was the first state to successfully ban all abortions after conception following the overturn of Roe v. Wade and continues to lead the way as one of the toughest states on abortion. Exceptions include life-saving procedures for the mother or pregnancies resulting from "rape, sexual assault, or incest." Those who perform legal abortions can be reported and prosecuted criminally under state law HB427 and be charged at least $10,000 per illegal abortion procedure. Violations also include insurance companies or private citizens caught funding abortions.

Though Oklahoma has not adopted a state constitutional amendment concerning abortion, its Public Health Code states that it cannot be “construed as creating or recognizing right to abortion."

9. South Dakota

South Dakota bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases for the mother. There are no exceptions for rape and incest. However, it is legal to travel out of state to get an abortion. There are no state constitutional provisions protecting against abortion.

10. Tennessee

Tennessee bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases for the mother. There is currently a movement in the Tennessee state legislature to enact exceptions for rape and incest. Like Idaho and Missouri, healthcare practitioners who gave an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Those who provide abortions illegally can be criminally prosecuted.

Tennessee's state constitution was amended to supersede a 2000 Tennessee supreme court case, which held:

A woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy is a vital part of the right to privacy guaranteed by the Tennessee Constitution [and that] the right is inherent in the concept of ordered liberty embodied in our constitution and is therefore fundamental.

The new state constitutional amendment reads as follows:

Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of an abortion.

11. Texas

Texas bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases concerning the mother. There is a movement in the Texas state legislature to provide exemptions for rape and incest.

Moreover, Texas received a lot of heat for its law not only criminalizing providing illegal abortions but enabled citizens to report illegal abortions. However, several cities in Texas are pushing back against the abortion ban. After Dobbs, Texas increased the penalties for performing an abortion up to life in prison, including a civil penalty of no less than $100,000 per abortion performed.

Attorney General Ken Paxton said the following:

Now that the Supreme Court has finally overturned Roe, I will do everything in my power to protect mothers, families, and unborn children, and to uphold the state laws duly enacted by the Texas Legislature.

The cities of Austin and San Antonio passed ordinances preventing city funds from being used to investigate the provision or receipt of abortion care.

12. West Virginia

West Virginia bans abortion at all stages of pregnancy, except in the case of a “nonmedically viable fetus”, ectopic pregnancy, or medical emergency. According to the West Virginia state legislature, "Nonmedically viable fetus" means:

A fetus that contains sufficient lethal fetal anomalies so as to render the fetus medically futile or incompatible with life outside the womb in the reasonable medical judgment of a reasonably prudent physician.

Victims of rape and incest can obtain abortions up to eight weeks after conception, but only if they report to law enforcement first.

In 2018, West Virginians voted to add the following language to the state constitution:

Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of abortion.