Glenn's invitation to George Soros



Glenn Beck is seen here on GlennBeck.TV, a feature available exclusively

to Glenn Beck Insider Extreme members.

Learn more...

GLENN: George, George Soros, are you listening today? Do you have your

minions listening today? Do you have any of your little

organizations plotting,

planning, doing anything today? Oh, I sure hope so George. Oh, I do. You know,

we should get together. We should, just you and me. Why talk between all of

these organizations? Why don't we just talk one on one, George? Why? And by the

way, George, I'm going to do a special on you in the next few weeks. Yes. And...

and... I think there's going to be something on that show that is going to

probably be front page news. I think maybe above the fold New York Times. Maybe,

maybe, maybe, George, maybe. Oh, it will be it will be so much better if you and

I just chatted because I've got some questions. You've done some confusing

things. Don't you hate when this happens, when all of your best laid global

governance plans? I mean, you've collapsed four economies, four currencies

before. You've done it four times, and nobody has gotten in your way. Oh,

George! What to do, what to do, what to do. Oh, gollee. You've got all that

money, all that global power, all these cute little organizations. Oh, and now

the people are getting in the way. Oh... don't you just sometimes, don't you

just want to round them all up? I mean, really, George? Don't you just want to

do that sometimes? Because people can be pesky. I know. I know, you can't. Darn

it. So you just have to set up all these organizations to... hypnotize them,

confuse them, push them, nudge them, shove them. Because you can't shoot 'em.

Shoot I mean, I didn't mean shoot! I mean... darn. George, sometimes people

don't like it when you nudge them, and sometimes when you nudge them and then

you try to shove them, sometimes, occasionally a gal or a guy... might do the

opposite. Might say, jeez, now, now that I was nudged and then I was shoved, now

I think I'm going to stand up and say, no. No, I'm not going to I'm sorry. Hang

on. Everybody in the listening audience, I'm sorry. I don't have his number. So

I just have to talk to him for a second. I'll get to you in a minute.

Where was I, George? Oh, yeah. Yeah, that's right. Sometimes if you... if you

reach out and you try to shove somebody up against the wall, they find their

spine and then they say, I'm not going to take it anymore. I'm going to expose

you. Uh oh. Anyway, George, you have my phone number. How do I know? You know I

know that. You know I know you have that number. Come on. You know. So anyway,

call me. Let's chat. What do you say? Okay? Full hour, radio, television. Hey,

I'll give you two hours, run on radio, one on television. We can talk and then

we can think about what we talked about in the morning and we could finish our

conversation on television. Hell, what do you say we talk for four hours? I got

three hours in the morning, one hour at night, just you and me. And we can speak

slowly because I know you are such a super brain, you are because, well, I well,

you know I know what you think about me! I know! I know that you know, because

you know and I know something that only you and I know. You know what I mean?

But that's not going to last long. So call me. Call me.

Okay. I'm sorry. Hello, everyone. Welcome to the by the way, I'm going to use an

old Jedi mind trick: You didn't hear that conversation between me and George

Soros. And, yes, it wasn't a monologue. It is a conversation because I can

guarantee you one of the minions, they were right now, it might be a delayed

conversation, but he's responding soon. It will be like, I can't believe that

he... that man is so evil, I can't take him anymore. Send another minion out! It

will be something like that. So it is a conversation. He'll just be a little

delayed.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

We've heard a lot about critical race theory lately, and for good reason: It's a racist ideology designed to corrupt our children and undermine our American values. But most of what we see are the results of a process that has been underway for decades. And that's not something the mainstream media, the Democrat Party, and even teachers unions want you to know. They're doing everything in their power to try and convince you that it's no big deal. They want to sweep everything under the rug and keep you in the dark. To fight it, we need to understand what fuels it.

On his Wednesday night special this week, Glenn Beck exposes the deep-seated Marxist origins of CRT and debunks the claims that it's just a harmless term for a school of legal scholarship. Newsweek opinion editor Josh Hammer joins to argue why we must ban critical race theory from our schools if we want to save a very divided nation.

Watch the full "Glenn TV" episode below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.