THIS is Change?

GLENN: I mean, think of the America that we live in today. Are we willing to have a woman as a President of the United States? I think the answer to that is yes. An African-American? The answer is yes. Are we really free at last. In many ways, in many ways I think we are. But the other thing, the other buzzword that's happening today is change. Everybody wants change. Vote for change. Every single slogan for every single person is about change, or even in the case of Ron Paul it goes beyond change. It's revolution. What is the definition of change? Definition of change, I looked it up. To cause to be different. To give completely different form or appearance to or to transform. To exchange or replace with another. To lay aside, abandon or leave, to transfer from one to another, excuse me, to become different, to undergo altercation -- or alteration. Undergo transformation or transition. To go from one phase to another, as the moon goes from one phase to another or seasons change. My question is, which one of these defines the change? Is it just to go from one to another? Is that the kind of change we're talking about if really Clinton and McCain are the two candidates? If those are the two candidates, if we have as a nation gone from all of the candidates, that we had all of the choices that we have had in these primaries and we end up with McCain and Clinton, are those the agents of change? I mean, I find it absolutely amazing, incredible to me that Clinton is an agent of change. Has anybody noticed the pattern? Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton? I mean, I don't want another Bush. I don't want another Clinton. And the reason why is because, not that I hate the families or anything else. I mean, I like the Bush family. Not really my favorite politicians, but I like them. I just don't want another one. I like change. And I happen to know specifically what kind of change I want, but I'm beginning to believe the United States of America, the average person, doesn't know what kind of change they want. They don't even know what they're voting for. Tell me what kind of change Hillary Clinton brings. Tell me what kind of change John McCain brings. Tell me what conservative, tell me what Republican is saying John McCain's the guy? Now, maybe you're one of these new Republicans, the anti-Reagan Republican, the one that doesn't understand how taxes work. I don't get the change thing here.

Another thing that really just drives me crazy, and I'm looking into, we're asking all of the candidates -- I doubt they'll tell us, but we're going to ask every single one of them. Why is it you hate Mitt Romney? Because that's the big thing. All the candidates hate Mitt Romney. They've all ganged up on Mitt Romney. "You know the GOP, they hate Mitt Romney." Well, I want to find out if that's even true, and if it is, that's reason number 1400 for me to vote for Mitt Romney. Oh, the GOP doesn't even like him? Good. I don't even know if it's true. I know it is with the press. I don't understand how you can have more candidates in Nevada and yet the South Carolina primary is more important. It's not more important -- when it comes to the Democrats, Nevada is where they focus. So Nevada is important with the Democrats but completely irrelevant when it comes to a win for Mitt Romney.

Now there's a new poll out in Florida and it goes to prove what I had as a working theory that once people start to see it come down to McCain, I thought they were going to go for Giuliani. I thought when it got right down to it, they would go for Giuliani.

New Rasmussen poll that just came out in Florida, everybody was bunched down to about 18%. The new poll shows that Romney's at 25%; everybody else is staying down about 18%. So now Romney is leading in Florida and I think that's because people are coming to their senses on McCain. I thought the opposite would happen in Florida because Giuliani had been there for so long, I thought the Giuliani strategy might actually work because you would get down to this point and you would see McCain and you would be like, come on, man, not McCain, no way McCain. You're kidding me, right? McCain, McCain/Feingold, McCain/Lieberman?

You want change? Here's the change you're going to get. You put Clinton or McCain in there -- you know what, first of all, McCain/Clinton is not a choice. It's a ticket. It's the McClinton ticket. It's the same thing. You're going to get -- well, with Hillary you'll get more spending. That's the only difference. John McCain will try to stop spending. But both of them look at taxes exactly the same way. You are going to get a gigantic tax bill at the end, you are going to give away our country to national -- to internationalism. I mean, McCain/Lieberman. Sign all kinds of global treaties on global warming. Oh, we're going to take a break, then I'm going to come back. I've got to give you this great story out of Greenland. Is it Greenland or is it Iceland? Which one -- I think it's Greenland because that one has the ice. It's a great story, unbelievably cold temperatures. Everything is freezing. Everything's out of control. And you won't believe what the mayor of one of these towns up in Greenland has said. He's a big global warming guy. Disregard all of the ice. Wait until I give you the quote. If it doesn't say it all about global warming, I don't know what does, but let's rush to that change, shall we?

Sen. Ted Cruz: NOBODY should be afraid of Trump's Supreme Court justice pick

Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Wednesday to weigh in on President Donald Trump's potential Supreme Court nominees and talk about his timely new book, "One Vote Away: How a Single Supreme Court Seat Can Change History."

Sen. Cruz argued that, while Congressional Democrats are outraged over President Trump's chance at a third court appointment, no one on either side should be afraid of a Supreme Court justice being appointed if it's done according to the founding documents. That's why it's crucial that the GOP fills the vacant seat with a true constitutionalist.

Watch the video below to hear the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Wednesday to talk about why he believes President Donald Trump will nominate Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death.

Lee, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee that will consider and vote on the nominee, also weighed in on another Supreme Court contender: Judge Barbara Lagoa. Lee said he would not be comfortable confirming Lagoa without learning more about her history as it pertains to upholding the U.S. Constitution.

Watch the video below to hear the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

This week on the Glenn Beck Podcast, Glenn spoke with Vox co-founder Matthew Yglesias about his new book, "One Billion Americans: The Case for Thinking Bigger."

Matthew and Glenn agree that, while conservatives and liberals may disagree on a lot, we're not as far apart as some make it seem. If we truly want America to continue doing great things, we must spend less time fighting amongst ourselves.

Watch a clip from the full interview with Matthew Yglesias below:


Find the full podcast on Glenn's YouTube channel or on Blaze Media's podcast network.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

'A convenient boogeyman for misinformation artists': Why is the New York Times defending George Soros?

Image source: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images

On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday, Glenn discussed the details of a recent New York Times article that claims left-wing billionaire financier George Soros "has become a convenient boogeyman for misinformation artists who have falsely claimed that he funds spontaneous Black Lives Matter protests as well as antifa, the decentralized and largely online, far-left activist network that opposes President Trump."

The Times article followed last week's bizarre Fox News segment in which former House Speaker Newt Gingrich appeared to be censored for criticizing Soros (read more here). The article also labeled Glenn a "conspiracy theorist" for his tweet supporting Gingrich.

Watch the video clip below for details:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.