Financial crisis? What crisis? Obama spending $2 billion to visit Mumbai

UPDATE:  These numberss, originally reported by an Indian news agency, are now being disputed by multiple media outlets. The correct numbers are unclear but will be updated once the information becomes available.

-----



Glenn Beck is seen here on GlennBeck.TV, a feature available exclusively to Glenn Beck Insider Extreme members. Learn more...

GLENN: There's something else wrong. This New Delhi trip really, really bothers me. Not in the way that it's just costing $2 billion for ten days so he can see the Festival of Lights.

PAT: That part bothers me. I'm bothered by that.

GLENN: $2 billion so the president can go to New Delhi.

PAT: We know the president needs security and they're renting out the Taj Mahal hotel and if that's what you need to do for security, but why do it in the first place?

GLENN: Why does he have to go there?

PAT: Is there an international crisis? You can bring all of India to Washington for less than $2 billion.

STU: Gotomeeting.com is something I have heard of.

GLENN: Seriously why are we going? The only answer I get is that he wants to see the Festival of Lights. No, it's $2 billion. We have 34 warships. Have you seen this? I mean, we have the president of the United States riding around on a girl's bike with a pink helmet on and now in New Delhi, they have decided to remove all of the coconuts from the trees in case one falls from the tree and hits him in the head.

PAT: Can't he wear his pink helmet?

GLENN: Let him wear his pink helmet. I'm telling you, there's something wrong with this trip. I never seen have you ever seen the president ever seen the president go over for a vacation where you needed 34 warships?

STU: It's not really a vacation. He has to have some meetings scheduled or something.

GLENN: I'm sure he has meetings. What?

STU: They're a big trade partner.

GLENN: It sure is. What?

STU: I don't know the details of his schedule.

GLENN: $2 billion.

STU: That's a lot of money.

GLENN: Remember when a billion was a lot of money? $2 billion, 34 warships. We are sending. He's traveling with 3,000 people. I went on vacation in a town of 1,600. I could have taken two of the towns I went on vacation with in the mountains, two Driggs, Idaho and I could have taken them on a plane and gone to India and I could have done it for less than $2 billion.

STU: $2 billion, jeez, that's over a day of quantitative easing we could have for that. That's an entire day.

GLENN: Seriously? I want an answer. What are we going over for?

STU: Yeah, I don't know. And that's the

GLENN: Jeff is in the back and said it's our relationship. It's called the phone.

STU: Tweet them.

GLENN: There's no reason. Are you kidding me? When did we have a complete lack of common sense? Here when my first daughter was born, I was very poor and so were my parents, and when Mary was born, she had complications. She was born with cerebral palsy and she was having strokes and freaking out. Well, my folks could not afford I couldn't afford to send them to bring them down and they couldn't afford to close the Bakery, but they did. Why? Because their children were in crisis. Now it took them a long time to be able to make that back up. They did it because their children were in crisis. So Sometimes you spend $2 billion. This isn't one of those times.

STU: What's so important?

GLENN: What's so important that we're spending $2 billion and I will tell you something else, risking the president's life. This is not a safe part of the world. The reason why we have 34 warships there is because this is not a safe part of the world.

PAT: Anybody remember what happened in Mumbai two years ago with the terrorist?

GLENN: I would like a security expert to tell me the risk of the president's life. First of all, if you have to have 34 warships, is there anyone I know the Secret Service, I know the Secret Service, I know these people, there is no way the Secret Service is saying this is a cool trip. Will anyone verify with the secret Service? Is the Secret Service totally cool with this, are they? The protectors of the president, you can't tell me the secret service is saying, yeah, Mr. President this is no big deal. If they have 34 warships going and they're totally cool with it, if there is no threat to the president, can we scale back it the 34 warships? But I can tell you that they take their charge very seriously as does the military. There's no way they're going to go in some place with, A, too much stuff. I mean, you want to talk about I mean, this is P. Diddy with $2 billion. You want to talk about an entourage. That's something the entire world sees. There's no way, well I was going to say protocol in this office, they could be like hey, you know what tell them a joke how dumb Indians are and they're running slurpy stores. Yeah, from Joe Biden. This audience knows clearly how bad the protocol office is so maybe they don't notice. It will be cool. We'll roll in with 34 warships and people will think that's cool. They're taking coconuts down for us. I don't think so. The world will notice this and it's grotesque in its nature unless it's needed. I believe it's needed which brings us back to the original question, why are we going?

STU: They had a terror threat there very recently. We just had a bomb that was disarmed 17 minutes before it was supposed to explode. There's a lot of action out there.

PAT: May I bring up the most important issue, global warming. 34 warships. He is flying by helicopter Marine One from the city airport to the Indian Navy's Helibase and from there, he drives down in a Lincoln Continental, the presidential limousine.

GLENN: It's not a Continental, it's a Cadillac.

PAT: Two jets armed and a fleet of over 40 vehicles will be part of the convoy. Global warming.

GLENN: Hang on just a second. That's his convoy. Hang on just a second. 40 cars is his convoy. You don't get 3,000 guests into 40 cars.

PAT: That's true. They said around 800 rooms have been booked for the president and his entourage.

STU: You don't put 3,000 people in 800 rooms unless people are bunking up.

GLENN: What am I missing here?

STU: There's a huge global conference going on there, you would understand to some degree.

GLENN: No, if we were saying, we're going to launch the new world order in India, then maybe he has to attend.

STU: I know all the international groups, they have big conferences and you expect them to go. Really what is the big event? I'm sure he's got stuff planned over there. There's nothing on that scale.

GLENN: Security drills have been carried out at the hotel where the president will visit. Really, really? Have they? Have they changed the security procedures? They're doing drills. Let's good. Let's educate everybody. We've done the drills all right. Have they changed the itinerary from the other three times he was supposed to go? Have they changed it up at all? Have they done any of it? What did you say, Jeffy?

JEFFY: Of course they have, he's the president.

GLENN: Somebody in the press should ask. Somebody in the press should ask. They won't answer my questions. Somebody should ask. Why is the president of the United States spending $2 million going into this much risk.

STU: 2 billion.

GLENN: I'm sorry, $2 billion going to this much risk, why are we jeopardizing the safety of the president of the United States? And I see how much money we are spending. If he's not at risk, why are you spending it is? If he is at risk, why is he going? Why? The festival of Lights. The press is fine and comfortable with what the president says. He wants to experience the Festival of Lights. Let them eat cake.

For the first time in the history of "The Glenn Beck Program," former President Donald Trump joined Glenn to give his take on America's direction under President Joe Biden compared to his own administration. He explained why Biden's horrific Afghanistan withdrawal was "not even a little bit" like his plan, and why he thinks it was "the most embarrassing event in the history of our country."

Plus, the former president gave his opinion on China's potential takeover of Bagram Air Base, the Pakistani Prime Minister, and Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Glenn asked President Trump how similar the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan was to his administration's plan.

"Not even a little bit," Trump answered. "We had a great plan, but it was a very tenuous plan. It was based on many conditions. For instance, you can't kill American soldiers. ... You have to understand, I did want to get out. But I wanted to get out with dignity, and I wanted to take our equipment out. And I didn't want soldiers killed. ... What [Biden] did was just indefensible. He took the military out first and he left all the people. And then we became beggars to get the people out. I had a plan to get them out very quickly. But first, the Americans would go out."

Trump told Glenn that his plan included maintaining Bagram Air Base and explained why he would not have left "a single nail" behind in Afghanistan for the Taliban to seize.

"We were going to keep Bagram open," he explained. "We were never going to close that because, frankly, Bagram is more about China than it is about Afghanistan. It was practically on the other border of China. And now we've lost that. And you know who is taking it over? China is taking it over. We spend $10 billion to build that base. It's got the longest, most powerful runways in the world. And China has now got its representatives there and it looks like they'll take it over. Glenn, it's not believable what's happened. You know, they have Apache helicopters. These are really expensive weapons, and they have 28 of them. And they're brand-new. The latest model."

Glenn mentioned recent reports that Gen. Milley, America's top military officer, made "secret phone calls" to his counterpart in China while President Trump was in office.

"I learned early on that he was a dope," Trump said of Gen. Milley. "He made a statement to me — and I guarantee that's what happened to Biden — because I said, 'We're getting out of Afghanistan. We have to do it.' And I said, 'I want every nail. I want every screw. I want every bolt. I want every plane. I want every tank. I want it all out, down to the nails, screws, bolts ... I want every single thing. And he said, 'Sir, it's cheaper to leave it than it is to bring it.'

"The airplane might have cost $40 million, $50 million ... millions and millions of dollars. So, you think it's cheaper to leave it than to have 200 pilots fly over and fly all the equipment out? ... I said, you've got to be nuts. I mean, give me a tank of gas and a pilot and I just picked up a $40 million-dollar airplane. It was amazing. So, I learned early that this guy is a dope. But what he did, is he hurt our country ... and he shouldn't have been allowed to do it. And bad things should happen to him."

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation or find the full interview on BlazeTV:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

In a shocking but underreported conversation ahead of the G7 Speakers' meeting in London last week, Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi admitted that the administration knows China is committing "genocide" against the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang region, but thinks working with the regime on climate change is more important.

On the radio program, an outraged Glenn Beck dissected Pelosi's speech and broke down how — along with the Biden administration's abandonment of Americans in Afghanistan, and the Democrat decision to follow measures of medical "equity" — the far left is revealing how little they really care about human life.

Glenn played a video clip of Pelosi making the following statement:

We've always felt connected to China, but with their military aggression in the South China Sea, with their continuation of genocide with the Uyghurs in Xinjiang province there, with their violation of the cultural, linguistic, religious priority of Tibet, with their suppression of democracy in Hong Kong and other parts of China, as well – they're just getting worse in terms of suppression, and freedom of speech. So, human rights, security, economically [sic].

Having said all of that ... we have to work together on climate. Climate is an overriding issue and China is the leading emitter in the world, the U.S. too and developed world too, but we must work together.

"We have Nancy Pelosi admitting the United States of America knows that they're not only committing [genocide], they're continuing to commit it. Which means, we've known for a while," Glenn noted. "And what does she say? She goes on to say, yes, they're committing genocide against the Uyghurs, but having said that, I'm quoting, 'the overriding issue,' is working together on climate change.

"Would we have worked with Hitler on climate change? Would we have worked with Hitler on developing the bomb? Would we have worked with Hitler on developing the Autobahn? Would we have worked with Hitler on his socialized medicine? Would we have worked with Hitler on any of his national, socialist ideas?" he asked.

"The answer is no. No. When you're committing genocide, no! She said 'we have to work together on climate,' because climate is the 'overriding issue.' The overriding issue? There is no way to describe this mindset. That, yes, they are killing an entire group of people because of their ethnicity or religion. They are systematically rounding them up, using them for slave labor, and killing them, using their organs and selling them on the open market. They are nothing more than cattle. For us to recognize it and do nothing about it is bad enough. But to say, 'we recognize it, but we have bigger things to talk to them about,' is a horror show."

Glenn went on to urge Americans to "stand up together in love, peace, and harmony," or risk watching our nation become the worst plague on human life yet.

Watch the video clip below to hear more from Glenn:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The fall of Lehman Brothers in 2008 marked the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history and economic collapse was felt throughout the world. But now China's own version of Lehman Brothers, Evergrande, is teetering closer and closer to that edge, too. On the radio program Thursday, Glenn Beck gave the latest update and predicted how it will affect Asian markets and what it could mean for America's economy.

Glenn explained why he believes a major collapse that is happening now in China will have a cascading effect into a "controlled collapse," a managed decline that will dramatically change America's economy and the way we all live.

"You will not recognize your lifestyle. Hear me," Glenn warned. "And that's not a right-left thing. That's a right-wrong thing. We're on the wrong track. I'm telling you now, there's new information and you are not going to recognize the American lifestyle. ... It could happen tomorrow. It could happen in five years from now, but it will happen. We are headed for a very different country. One where you don't have the rights that you have. And you certainly don't have the economic privileges that Americans are used to."

"The same thing that happened in 2008 is now happening in China," Glenn continued. "This time, it's going to take everything down. When it collapses, it will take everything down."

Watch the video below to hear Glenn break down the details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Justin Haskins, editorial director of the Heartland Institute, joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to expose a shocking conversation between two Great Reset proponents — Klaus Schwab, chairman of the World Economic Forum, and Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank (Europe's equivalent to the Fed).

The way Schwab and Lagarde discuss the role central banks should play in establishing societal norms, determining your way of life, and defending against potential crisis is proof that the Great Reset is upon us, Justin explained. And the scariest part is that they're not even trying to hide it. The entire, unbelievable conversation has been published on the WEF website, which you can read here.

Glenn read an excerpt from the conversation:

Christine Lagarde: At the ECB, we have now wrapped up and concluded our strategy review, which was the first one in 17 years. And I was blessed to have an entire Governing Council unanimously agree that the fight against climate change should be one of the considerations that we take when we determine monetary policy. So at least the European Central Bank is of the view that climate change is an important component in order to decide on monetary policy. ...

Can we arrive at that trade-off between fighting climate change, preserving biodiversity and yet securing enough growth to respond to legitimate demands of the population? And my first answer, Klaus, to be firm, is that to have a way of life, we need life. And in the medium term, we do have major threats on the horizon that could cause the death of hundreds of thousands of people. So we have to think life, first. We have to think way of life, second. ...

So we have to think life, first. We have to think way of life, second. How can we come together to make sure that we secure the first priority, which is life, and also protect the way of life that people have? And make sure that the cost of it is not so high for some people, that they just cannot tolerate it. I think that the trade-off that we reach will probably require some redistribution, because it is clear that the most exposed people, the less privileged people are those that are going to need some help.

"Do you understand, America, what that means?" Glenn exclaimed. "You have elites, that you never elected, that are having these meetings ... deciding what is a legitimate need for you. And telling you that your needs are going to go away in your lifetime. You may not see a time where you get wants again. Just your needs are going to be addressed. Am I reading this wrong?"

"This is absolutely what is being said here," Justin agreed. "She's very clear that we need to make sure that way of life is second to life. We have to save all these people, hundreds of thousands of people are going to die from this supposedly existential threat of climate change. And their wants, and their desires, and their quality of living, all of that has to come second."

"This is a central bank saying this. This is not an elected official, who is accountable directly to the people. This is a central bank saying, we're going to print money. We're going to use monetary policy, to impose these ideas, to rework society in order to accomplish our goals," Justin added, addressing Lagarde's call for "some redistribution."

Will Great Reset elites — not elected by the U.S. — soon be dictating to the rest of the world? Watch the video clip below to hear Glenn and Justin break it down:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.