Glenn Beck: Caller defends Soros



Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Extreme broadcast, an exclusive feature

available only to Glenn Beck Insider Extreme members.

Learn more...

GLENN: 888-727-BECK. Let's go to Al in West Palm Beach. Hello, Al.

CALLER: Hey, Glenn.

GLENN: Hey, Al.

CALLER: How are you, buddy?

GLENN: Good, how are you?

CALLER: Did you ever do something in your life that you were somewhat forced

into doing? Well, that's what's happening to me today, and I hate, I hate being

forced into this.

GLENN: Oh, my.

CALLER: And my dear old wife was the one to dial the phone and put me --

GLENN: Dear old wife. Okay, so Al, hang on just a second.

CALLER: Yes.

GLENN: So you're experiencing a point in your life, and everyone experiences

these points, where you are doing something that you're forced to do, you don't

want to do but you feel you have to do it for one reason or another, you feel

you have to do it but you regret it?

CALLER: I regret it, especially today when you're being filed on by the --

GLENN: I know, I know.

PAT: Especially today.

GLENN: Especially today.

PAT: Especially today.

GLENN: So -- but you regret making this call but you feel it's something you

have to do. I understand that. Go ahead.

PAT: But.

CALLER: And the reason why my -- the purpose of my call is to basically --

PAT: Of course it is.

CALLER: -- put my wife's mind at rest.

PAT: Oh, good.

GLENN: It's your wife. It's your wife. It's not you.

PAT: We're all in favor of that.

GLENN: All right. Well, go ahead.

PAT: Actually it's not you. It's her. Go ahead.

CALLER: Listen, you're my friend, I agree with 70% of what you said.

PAT: 70%.

GLENN: Good. All right. Go ahead.

PAT: 75, 77?

GLENN: Stop. Now, go ahead. Go ahead.

PAT: 65?

GLENN: Shhh. Quiet. Let Al speak. Go ahead. So what is it you have to do?

CALLER: Anyway, listen. George Soros is a dirt ball. He wants to create an

economic socialist world utopia.

GLENN: No, it's not socialist. It's called an open society, but go ahead.

CALLER: Whatever. And so in order for him to do that, he has elevated some poor

countries to a certain level of financial wellbeing. You say that he has

destroyed the economies of X, Y and Z country.

GLENN: Yeah, four, four separate countries.

CALLER: Right. At the same time these countries today, if I'm -- I sit to be

corrected -- are in better financial shape than they were when he intervened.

Now --

GLENN: Hang on just a second. Hang on just a second.

CALLER: Yes.

GLENN: No, not England. But let's -- I think I see what you're saying. What

you're saying is some of these countries that he collapsed, or he collapsed the

economies on, they were oppressive regimes.

CALLER: Exactly.

GLENN: Exactly. And so you'd like me to point that out?

CALLER: Yes.

GLENN: Oh, okay. So in other words, in other words let me put your wife's mind

at ease. So in other words, do we happen to have the cut? What show is this

from, Stu?

STU: It's from, you've got to go way back in history. It's from today.

PAT: How old were you today? I mean --

STU: From earlier today.

PAT: Think back. Who can remember what happened today.

GLENN: Well, I can't remember what happened today.

PAT: How old were you?

GLENN: I can't be held responsible for what I did today.

PAT: Earlier today, how old were you?

GLENN: I've been on the air for 37 minutes.

PAT: Please, this is ancient history.

GLENN: Let's go back in the last 37 minutes.

PAT: I protest.

GLENN: You think this is too --

PAT: This is too --

GLENN: Too far in the past?

PAT: Too far back. I don't even --

GLENN: Well, let's just show it for history. Here's what happened in the last 37

minutes.

A man who is a hedge fund manager and has survived economic chaos, a man who has

brought down four regimes, nasty ones.

PAT: Oh, nasty ones.

GLENN: You mean like that, like me pointing out that those were nasty countries,

some of them.

PAT: You did that. But may I point out again?

GLENN: Yes.

PAT: That was about... 38 minutes ago?

GLENN: I can't be held responsible for what I said --

CALLER: Well, Glenn, you can be -- if you want, you know, if you want to make

fun of it, I'll laugh along with you. But if you want --

GLENN: I'm not making fun of it. No, no, I'm not laughing. I'm giving you the

facts.

CALLER: If you want to be fair and if I may put a -- if you want to be fair, in

the past couple of days you basically have painted with a great big, wide brush

as to his financial dealing, and as I say --

GLENN: No, I haven't talked about his financial dealings.

CALLER: Yes, you have.

GLENN: No, I haven't. I mean, I've mentioned his financial dealings. I've

mentioned that he makes -- you know, he's the 35th richest man in the world,

yes. I have talked about his hedge fund. I have not questioned how he makes his

money. I have questioned that he has made money off of the backs of the British

people and collapsed the British sterling which led to misery. I have played his

own words where he says, "Well, there were some unfortunate circumstances and

things that happened, you know, that you can't control. That's why I had to

experiment" with people's lives.

CALLER: Can I focus on two things that you said?

GLENN: That is fantastic. I'd love that, Al.

CALLER: For the past couple of days --

PAT: Just to put your wife's mind --

GLENN: Your wife's mind at ease.

PAT: -- at ease.

CALLER: For the past couple of days you have made fun of subversive tactics in

which Soros relished in the fact that he actually became involved in that.

GLENN: Yes.

CALLER: But if you -- the way you made it seem is that --

GLENN: No, hang on just a second. I didn't quote him, Al. I played the audio of

him saying subversive tactics.

CALLER: Play it again.

GLENN: Oh, okay. We can do that. Hang on just --

PAT: I'm going to play it again. Listen. Al.

GLENN: Al.

PAT: Al.

GLENN: Al.

PAT: We're going to play it again.

GLENN: Here it is, Al.

PAT: We're going to play it again, Al.

CALLER: Okay, guys, you can --

GLENN: Al!

PAT: Al!

GLENN: You wanted to hear it again. Let's play it again.

SOROS: When you try to, let's say improve society, you affect different people

and different interests differently and they are not actually commensurate. So

you very often have all kinds of unintended adverse consequences. So I had to

experiment, and it was a learning process. The first part was this subversive

activity, disrupting the oppressive regimes. That was a lot of fun and that's

actually what got me hooked on this whole enterprise.

GLENN: Okay, go ahead, Al. So what's your point we just played?

CALLER: What was the operative word there?

GLENN: I don't know.

PAT: There were several.

GLENN: There was a lot of them.

PAT: Several operative words.

CALLER: The operative word, my friend, is repressive.

GLENN: Oh, man, Al, I never thought of that! What a great point! So that brings

us exactly right to the point, now, doesn't it? He has collapsed four -- Al, he

has collapsed four regimes, four. They're repressive. Could you tell me what the

biggest obstacle is to justice and peace in the new world order, what is the

biggest obstacle, sir, in his own words?

CALLER: May --

GLENN: Answer the question, Al. Answer the question. Have you -- put your wife

on the phone. Have her answer the question.

CALLER: I will answer your question if you allow me to expand a little bit. Will

you allow me that?

GLENN: Answer the question and then you may expand.

CALLER: Thank you. I will answer your question. He has stated, and this is why I

hate to -- why I hate this guy and why I think --

GLENN: Oh, you hate him? I don't hate him.

CALLER: -- he is a dirt ball. The answer to your question is the fact that he

has stated that the greatest obstacle to world identity or whatever you want to

say is the United States of America.

GLENN: Oh, so he believes it is a repressive regime.

CALLER: I have answered your question. No, he did not say it was a repressive

regime.

GLENN: What do you think the biggest obstacle to justice and peace would be?

CALLER: America --

GLENN: A happy regime?

CALLER: American independence.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: So in other words, you don't want American independence?

CALLER: No --

GLENN: You think American independence --

CALLER: Hello. You said that you would allow me to expand.

GLENN: Go right ahead, Al. We could put your wife on. I'd rather talk to her.

CALLER: You're a hell of a sport. He has his subversive policies overthrew

repressive regimes and that is what he was laughing at. And I agree with him

100%. I am from Cuba. I wish that he would repressively -- I mean that he would

subversively take down the government of Cuba.

GLENN: It is amazing to me that you're from Cuba.

CALLER: You would actually be laughing along with him if that was the case,

would you not?

GLENN: It is amazing to me, sir, that you are from Cuba and you believe American

independence, American independence -- anyone who says that America is the

biggest obstacle to a new world order and justice and peace, and you want to

stand and defend that man is amazing to me. I am not defending the -- or I'm not

accusing the man of collapsing regimes and saying it was wrong for him to do it.

I showed you he collapses regimes so I could show you the steps that he takes.

There are five steps that the man takes to collapse, and he is doing all five of

them. He did them on repressive regimes, he has declared that America is a

repressive regime. Of course, you have to read into his words, but that goes

back to him saying he's like God and he's invisible. It also goes to his words

subversive activity. So he says that we are the biggest obstacle. I'm sorry he

doesn't use "Repressive." And then if you look at his pattern, there are five

steps, and I showed you the five steps that he's done in the past and the five

steps that he is doing right now.

Al, if you don't see it, that's okay, brother. Go back to sleep. Go back to

sleep. And I know you've regretted this phone call. I know, I know that you did

things that you just didn't want to do. And while you were doing them, you

regretted them. And maybe someday you'll even regret this phone call even more,

sir. But see, that's another point, that sometimes you do things whether you

are, what, 40, 50, 80 or 14, sometimes you do things that you have to do, but

you regret them. And the operative word there is "Regret."

How prepared are YOU to weather a future crisis? We recently published a brand new quiz so you can find out exactly how prepared you are. Whether you're a "prepper" with a bunker fit for the apocolypse or just want to feel more secure for the future, there is always something more to learn. That's why Glenn wants to give his newsletter subscribers his "Ultimate Preparation Guide," filled with practical tips for building a solid foundation to weather future crises. And let's face it—in our crazy world right now, who couldn't use a bit more peace of mind?

Enter your email below to get "Glenn's Ultimate Preparation Guide" sent straight to your inbox!

Editor's Note: Arizona House Bill HB2770 has since been shut down! AZ Rep. Rachel Jones tweeted that the AZ Freedom Caucus shut down the bill before it could reach the board. It is encouraging to see states stepping to protect the American people from getting one step closer to a Central Bank Digital Currency. Hopefully, Arizona will be a precedent for the other states!

On today's radio broadcast, Glenn warned about dangerous Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) language being smuggled into routine legislation in REPUBLICAN-led states. This is unacceptable, and as Glenn said, we can't let this legislation pass as it now stands.

The legislation being used to smuggle in this CBDC language is the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), a routine piece of legislation passed on the state level that helps standardize commercial and business transactions. However, a new round of UCCs being deliberated RIGHT NOW amongst a swath of Republican-led states anticipate the use of "electronic money." In a public letter sent to the Republican states currently deliberating this legislation, the Pro-Family Legislative Network said this can only refer to the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) under consideration and testing by the Federal Reserve. Biden's Executive Order 14067 issued in March of 2022 started the push for CBDC, and now these states, knowingly or unknowingly, are laying the legislative groundwork for making CBDC a reality.

There is absolutely no reason why Republican-led states should aid in laying the foundation for CBDC, yet 12 of them are deliberating it RIGHT NOW, with one UCC bill already on one GOP governor's desk! We have to act NOW to stop these UCCs in their tracks and demand our lawmakers amend the bills without the "electronic money" language.

If your state is listed below, contact your representative NOW to put an end to CBDC language.

1. North Dakota

North Dakota House Bill HB1082 passed BOTH chambers and is now sitting on Governor Burgum's desk. Burgun has 3 DAYS to veto this bill once it's placed on his desk—if not, it will pass automatically. If you are a North Dakota resident, it is absolutely CRUCIAL that you contact Governor Burgum's office NOW and demand that he veto this bill and re-introduce it without the "electronic money" language.

2. Arizona

Arizona House Bill HB2770 has been SHUT DOWN! See the above editor's note for more details.

Arizona House Bill HB2770 passed the House majority and minority caucuses. Arizona residents, contact your representative's office NOW so that they amend this bill without the "electronic money" language.

3. Arkansas

Arkansas House Bill HB1588 is in committee, and if passed, will head to the House floor. Though the bill is only in its beginning stages, it's important for Arkansas residents to stop this bill in its tracks and amend it without the "electronic money" language.

4. Missouri

Missouri House Bill HB1165 is also in its beginning stages in committee. That means it's important to contact your representative as soon as possible to amend it without the "electronic money" language.

5. Oklahoma

Oklahoma House Bill HB 2776 passed the House Committee and will go to a chamber vote soon. If passed, it will go to the Senate, then the governor's desk. If you are an Indiana resident, contact your representative's office NOW to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

6. Indiana

Indiana Senate Bill SB0486 passed the Senate and is headed to the House. Republicans control Indiana's executive office and BOTH chambers of the legislature. There is no excuse for this bill to pass. If you are an Indiana resident, it's vital you contact your representative NOW and demand they amend this bill without the "electronic money" language.

7. Kentucky

Kentucky Senate Bill SB64 passed the Senate and is now being deliberated in the House. If you live in Kentucky, contact your representative's office to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

8. Montana

Montana Senate Bill SB370 passed the Senate and was sent to the House on March 3rd. If you are a Montana resident, contact your representative's office NOW so that the bill doesn't without changing the "electronic money" language.

9. Nebraska

Nebraska's Legislative Bill LB94 passed committee and the first floor vote. As Nebraska only has one legislative chamber, this bill is dangerously close to passing the legislature and being sent to the governor's desk. If you are a Nebraska resident, contact your representative's office NOW and demand they amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

10. New Hampshire

New Hampshire House Bill HB584 is currently in House committee deliberations and has not yet reached the House floor. If you are a New Hampshire resident, contact your representative's office NOW to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

11. Tennessee

Tennessee House Bill HB0640 didn't successfully pass the House. However, it was deferred to a Senate committee and has now taken the form of Senate Bill SB0479, which is now in committee. This bill is still alive, and it's important for you, Tennessee residents, to stop it before it reaches the floor! Contact your representative to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

12. Texas

Texas House Bill HB5011 was filed and is ready to be taken up by committee. Fellow Texans, let's not let this bill progress any further! Contact your representative and demand they amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

6 things you NEED to know about the Silicon Valley Bank collapse

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

Silicon Valley Bank's collapse is sparking traumatic memories of the 2008 financial crash. Should we be worried SVB is signaling a similar economic catastrophe, or is everyone overreacting to the media's hype? Glenn told his listeners to be "healthily terrified." This event is sure to have ripple effects throughout the economy, but the more you are informed about it, the more you can prepare. Here are 6 things you need to know about Silicon Valley Bank's crash—explained in simple words.

1. The short answer to what happened: SVB didn't have enough money to pay its depositors.

Remember the scene from It's a Wonderful Life when all of the residents make a run on George Bailey's bank demanding their money? Fortunately for them, their money was in the altruistic hands of George Bailey, who used his honeymoon savings to give the depositors the money they demanded.

Silicon Valley Bank's depositors weren't so lucky.

In short, the depositors made a run on Silicon Valley Bank, demanding the withdrawal of their money. But SVB simply didn't have the liquid money available to give their depositors, causing regulators to shut down the bank shortly afterward.

2. It all started with COVID...

Why didn't SVB have enough money for its depositors? To explain this, we have to go back to the pandemic era.

The pandemic saw a rapid decrease in spending and a massive increase in bank deposits. Due to the uncertainty of the future and lockdowns limiting ways to spend money on recreational activities, like restaurants, bars, and other outlets, many Americans stocked up money in their accounts. In fact, SVB's deposits doubled in 2021 alone, bringing in more money than they could lend out to their clients.

To make a return on their available cash, SVB wanted to invest it, as many banks do. Since they had reached their lending limit, they decided to invest it in U.S. Treasury Securities, which are the government's means of funding itself without using taxation (in a nutshell). These are considered "ultra-safe" investments because they are backed by the "full faith and credit of the federal government."

Unlike other forms of investments, investing in Treasuries means the government will do everything within its legal power to pay back the money used to fund itself. In other words, it is typically very safe... so what happened?

3. Then came the magic cocktail—record-high inflation and rising interest rates...

Interest rates ruined the typically "ultra-safe" investment. Due to 40-year record-high inflation, the Fed lifted rates eight times by a total of 4.25 percentage points in 2022, raising interest rates from 0.25 percent to 4.375 percent. This means the value of U.S. Treasuries investments plummeted rapidly. SVB reported that it lost $1.8 billion due to the decreased value of its Treasuries investments after a year of rising interest rates.

This raises the following question: why didn't SVB just weather the storm and wait for interest rates to decrease? There are two issues with this. The first is that, with so many of their assets held up in Treasuries investments, SVB still wouldn't have enough liquid assets to give their depositors during the bank run.

The second issue is that Treasuries investments have a ten-year limit. In 2021 during the Trump administration, interest rates were at an all-time low of 0.125 percent.

The record-fast increase of interest rates in 2022 caused very little chance for rates to go back down to their historic 2021 lows within ten years for banks to make their money back on their investments.

To avoid this, SVB planned to sell their investments at a loss and re-purchase Treasuries investments at the decreased value, giving them an extra ten years to bet on decreased interest rates in the future.

But people caught on to SVB's plan and didn't want to ride with the risk.

4. Account holders withdrew their money... FAST.

As aforementioned, SVP lost $1.8 billion when it sold its depleted Treasuries investments. While they were betting on being able to re-purchase the devalued securities, hoping that they would go up in value in the future with lowered interest rates, investors were worried about the risk.

Once they made the announcement of their $1.8 billion loss, their stocks began to drop, and venture capitalists warned the companies they invest in to pull out of SVB. This had a snowball effect, leading to a "bank run" of depositors demanding to withdraw their money from their SVB accounts.

This led to the perfect storm: SVB's investment losses coupled with the influx of withdrawals were so immense that regulators had to step in and shut the bank down to protect depositors. The government currently "running" SVB, for all practical purposes, is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC closed SVB on Friday and reopened the bank on Monday, March 13th as the Deposit Insurance Bank of Santa Clara.

5. Some people may lose their money. 

Banks insure accounts with $250,000 or less with FDIC insurance. That means, in cases of bank failure, exactly like this one, the FDIC covers all accounts less than $250,000. The FDIC said SVB customers who had less than $250,000 in their accounts will have access to all of their money when the bank reopens. Since it reopened this week, they should have access to their funds.

However, many of SVB's depositors had more than $250,000 in their accounts—it is Silicon Valley after all. Therefore, their accounts were not covered by FDIC insurance. Will they get their money back? There is a chance that they will not.

It is unclear how much SVB currently has to cover uninsured deposits. It is likely not enough. The FDIC has issued a "Receiver's Certificate" to the uninsured account holders with the amount in their account that is not covered by FDIC insurance.

The FDIC said it will pay some of the uninsured deposits by next week by liquidating any additional assets held by SVB. However, if the liquidated assets are not enough, many of SVB's uninsured account holders could lose their money for good.

6. Is this 2008 all over again?

SVB's collapse was the largest bank failure since 2008, when Washington Mutual failed with $307 billion in assets. Its failure, along with the collapse of the Lehman Brother's investment bank, triggered the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Are we in danger of repeating 2008?

Some argue that we are not in danger of another economic catastrophe, simply because SVB holds less than 1 percent of the nation's assets. However, as Glenn warns, there is a danger of banks repeating the same mistakes as SVP.

SVP wasn't the only bank to use its surplus deposits to invest in U.S. Treasuries, which means that other banks are wrestling with the depleted value of their securities investments due to rising interest rates.

Bank of America, for example, lost $109 billion in their securities investments due to rising interest rates, the most among its peers—and Bank of America is no small fish in the ocean of assets.

Other major banks recorded other massive losses in their securities investments due to rising interest rates. JP Morgan Chase lost $36 billion, Wells Fargo lost $41 billion, Citigroup lost $25 billion, and Goldman Sachs lost $1 billion. If the little banks collapse, will they get the same effort and attention from the federal government as the "big guys?"

The critic may argue that these are still small values given the incredibly large amount of assets held in banks nationwide. However, this is missing the point. Major banks have majorly invested in securities since the pandemic-era skyrocketing rate of deposits. Now those investments are depleted in value.

They can either sell those investments at a loss, or they can wait and hope that they will recover over time. However, if those investments are no longer liquid, what happens when their depositors come knocking? Will they have enough liquid assets to cover a massive bank run? These are the lingering questions that our banks need to address.

As Glenn says, this will impact you—it is only a matter of time. What will you do to prepare?

Glenn just purchased the entire historical Roe v. Wade archive as a solemn reminder of our nation's past and the vital importance of honoring the sacredness of life. Since Roe was overturned in 2022, many states have been stepping up to protect both their unborn citizens AND the mothers carrying them.

Which states are doing the most to protect their most vulnerable? Here are the top 12 states with the strictest laws against abortion.

1. Alabama

​Alabama has some of the nation's most protective pro-life measures, banning all abortions in the case of life-threatening circumstances for the mother. That means abortion is banned at every ​stage of pregnancy. Health care providers found guilty of performing abortions face a class-A felony, the most serious charge besides Capitol Murder, with the potential of carrying a life sentence in prison. However, the pill, Plan B, is classified as "contraception" rather than abortion. Taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures except in very limited circumstances.

Alabama is one of the few states to add protections within its state constitution for the unborn. The state:

Acknowledges, declares, and affirms that it is the public policy of this state to recognize and support the sanctity of unborn life and the rights of unborn children, including the right to life.

2. Arkansas

Like Alabama, Arkansas bans abortion at every stage of pregnancy except in life-threatening situations for the mother. However, Plan B is still considered "contraception" and is legal. Taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures except in very limited circumstances. Additionally, Arkansas added the amendment to its state constitution, declaring:

The policy of Arkansas is to protect the life of every unborn child from conception until birth, to the extent permitted by the Federal Constitution.

3. Idaho

Idaho bans abortions at every stage of pregnancy with the exceptions of life-threatening situations to the mother and instances of rape and incest. The health care practitioner who gave an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Patients approved for abortion must wait 24 hours after counseling to receive the procedure. Anyone who performs an abortion unless it's in one of the approved cases will face felony charges. Like Alabama and Arkansas, taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures.

Unlike Alabama and Arkansas, Idaho law does not include explicit constitutional or statutory protections for abortion.

4. Kentucky

Kentucky has also banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy except in life-threatening situations for the mother. There are no exceptions for rape or incest. However, abortion providers are fighting the all-out ban on abortion through appealing to the state's previous abortion ban after six weeks of pregnancy. The appeal is ongoing.

Though Kentucky voters voted down a proposal to add an amendment to the state constitution banning abortion, the state adopted the following policy towards abortion in 2018:

Children, whether born or unborn, are the greatest natural resource in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

5. Louisiana

Louisiana also banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy with no exceptions for rape or incest. However there is an appeal to allow abortions in the case of rape and incest. Healthcare practitioners who violate this ban are subject to criminal prosecution. Moreover, Louisiana adopted an amendment in their state constitution—specifically, the Louisiana Declaration of Rights, banning the construction of any constitutional right to abortion:

To protect human life, nothing in present constitution shall be construed to secure or protect a right to abortion or require the funding of abortion.

6. Mississippi

Mississippi bans all abortions except to save the life of the mother or in cases of rape or incest that have been reported to law enforcement. Though Mississippi did not adopt a constitutional amendment to ban abortion as a right, the Mississippi Code says:

Abortion carries significant physical and psychological risks to the maternal patient, and these physical and psychological risks increase with gestational age.

Moreover, doctors who perform illegal abortions face civil and criminal charges.

7. Missouri

Missouri bans all abortions except in the case of a medical emergency concerning the mother, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Those seeking to get an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Minors seeking an abortion through "affirmative defense" must do so with parental consent. Moreover, those seeking an abortion must be offered an ultrasound.

Moreover, Missouri adopted the following statute protecting the unborn:

It is the intention of the general assembly of the state of Missouri to: (1) [d]efend the right to life of all humans, born and unborn; (2) [d]eclare that the state and all of its political subdivisions are a ‘sanctuary of life’ that protects pregnant women and their unborn children; and (3) [r]egulate abortion to the full extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States, decisions of the United States Supreme Court, and federal statutes.

8. Oklahoma

Oklahoma was the first state to successfully ban all abortions after conception following the overturn of Roe v. Wade and continues to lead the way as one of the toughest states on abortion. Exceptions include life-saving procedures for the mother or pregnancies resulting from "rape, sexual assault, or incest." Those who perform legal abortions can be reported and prosecuted criminally under state law HB427 and be charged at least $10,000 per illegal abortion procedure. Violations also include insurance companies or private citizens caught funding abortions.

Though Oklahoma has not adopted a state constitutional amendment concerning abortion, its Public Health Code states that it cannot be “construed as creating or recognizing right to abortion."

9. South Dakota

South Dakota bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases for the mother. There are no exceptions for rape and incest. However, it is legal to travel out of state to get an abortion. There are no state constitutional provisions protecting against abortion.

10. Tennessee

Tennessee bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases for the mother. There is currently a movement in the Tennessee state legislature to enact exceptions for rape and incest. Like Idaho and Missouri, healthcare practitioners who gave an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Those who provide abortions illegally can be criminally prosecuted.

Tennessee's state constitution was amended to supersede a 2000 Tennessee supreme court case, which held:

A woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy is a vital part of the right to privacy guaranteed by the Tennessee Constitution [and that] the right is inherent in the concept of ordered liberty embodied in our constitution and is therefore fundamental.

The new state constitutional amendment reads as follows:

Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of an abortion.

11. Texas

Texas bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases concerning the mother. There is a movement in the Texas state legislature to provide exemptions for rape and incest.

Moreover, Texas received a lot of heat for its law not only criminalizing providing illegal abortions but enabled citizens to report illegal abortions. However, several cities in Texas are pushing back against the abortion ban. After Dobbs, Texas increased the penalties for performing an abortion up to life in prison, including a civil penalty of no less than $100,000 per abortion performed.

Attorney General Ken Paxton said the following:

Now that the Supreme Court has finally overturned Roe, I will do everything in my power to protect mothers, families, and unborn children, and to uphold the state laws duly enacted by the Texas Legislature.

The cities of Austin and San Antonio passed ordinances preventing city funds from being used to investigate the provision or receipt of abortion care.

12. West Virginia

West Virginia bans abortion at all stages of pregnancy, except in the case of a “nonmedically viable fetus”, ectopic pregnancy, or medical emergency. According to the West Virginia state legislature, "Nonmedically viable fetus" means:

A fetus that contains sufficient lethal fetal anomalies so as to render the fetus medically futile or incompatible with life outside the womb in the reasonable medical judgment of a reasonably prudent physician.

Victims of rape and incest can obtain abortions up to eight weeks after conception, but only if they report to law enforcement first.

In 2018, West Virginians voted to add the following language to the state constitution:

Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of abortion.