Glenn Beck: Social unrest is on the way


TheBlaze:


Pitchforks? Dem Senator Uses Violent Metaphor in Tax Hike Fight

GLENN: I want to play I want to play some audio for you. We just told you

about the coming Latino revolt according to Luis Gutierrez. We just played

Ronald Reagan, Jr., the ends justify the means, bring a knife or a gun to fight

for social justice. You have to do what you have to do to fight for social

justice. Now let's play Cut 176, Claire McCaskill. Here's what she says if taxes

aren't raised on the wealthy.

McCASKILL: I'm trying to find out how anyone can keep a straight face and say

they are for deficit reduction while they insist on a permanent tax cut for the

wealthiest Americans, completely unpaid for. Now, they want to say this is class

warfare. Well, you know, in a way it is because we're fighting for the middle

class.

PAT: It's not your money. It's not your money, honey.

McCASKILL: We are fighting for the middle class. Frankly the middle class hasn't

had enough champions in America.

GLENN: We need labor unions.

McCASKILL: 70% of Americans don't itemize deductions. So that big old complex

tax code, it's been written for wealthy America.

GLENN: Yes, it has. Special exceptions.

McCASKILL: The one that I and then you get to the very, very top where a lot of

these people's income is all about dividends and capital gains and not even

ordinary income and they have all kinds of ways

PAT: Let's do a flat tax.

McCASKILL: that they can use the tax code to avoid paying tax.

GLENN: She sounds like she's for a flat tax.

PAT: Yeah, doesn't it?

GLENN: That sounds great. I'm for her 100% on this.

PAT: Yeah. And everybody pays the same rate.

GLENN: Yeah, including Charlie Rangel.

PAT: And here's the thing. When you make a million dollars and you pay the same

rate as somebody who makes $30,000, guess what. The millionaire pays more.

STU: Really? How does that happen? It seems like the same number. You said the

same percentage.

PAT: I know, I know. But 15% of a million is more than 15% of $30,000.

STU: Really?

PAT: Yeah.

STU: Wow, that's convenient.

PAT: It's complicated, but

GLENN: But the progressive income tax works so much better. I mean, I know the

former communists in Russia don't think so.

PAT: No.

GLENN: You know.

PAT: No.

GLENN: But it's so much better, isn't it?

PAT: Yeah. Well, apparently not.

GLENN: The progressive income tax.

PAT: Apparently not. And it's never progressive enough for these progressives.

GLENN: I know. So here she is.

McCASKILL: This is about leveling the playing field for what has always made our

country different than everyone else.

GLENN: We never level the playing field.

McCASKILL: That is a strong vibrant middle class.

GLENN: Yes, that's view.

McCASKILL: And I will tell you this.

PAT: Tell us.

GLENN: Tell me.

McCASKILL: If they think it's okay to raise taxes

GLENN: You hear her calculating?

McCASKILL: For the embattled middle class.

GLENN: She's editing right now.

McCASKILL: Because they're gonna pout.

GLENN: Edit.

McCASKILL: If we don't give more money to millionaires.

GLENN: Edit.

McCASKILL: It really is time for the people of America to take up pitchforks.

GLENN: Okay.

PAT: Okay.

GLENN: You'll notice because I do this for a living. I do this I ad lib for a

living. Four hours a day on national television. Probably more than is there

anybody else? Is there anybody else that does more scrutinized four hours of

broadcast every day? I don't think so. I don't think so.

PAT: Probably not.

GLENN: And it's ad libbed. It's ad libbed. These are all my words. And so I know

and I can hear, because I know when I'm ad libbing and I'm saying something and

when I'm like, want to say something and then I... be... very... let me... time

to pick up the pitchforks. That's not what she wanted to say. She was editing.

She was thinking about, how's the best way? I've got to be very careful on this.

I have to be very careful on this. That's not what she wanted to say, pick up

the pitchforks. What did you want to say, Claire? Seriously? Shall we leave it

to Van Jones? Let me play Van Jones here from just a couple of days ago, the

recipe for a battleground by Van Jones, a, quote, nightmare scenario.

(Audio plays)

VAN JONES: A potential nightmare scenario.

GLENN: Potential nightmare scenario.

VAN JONES: where we're going to be as a nation more ethically diverse.

GLENN: Where we're more ethically diverse.

VAN JONES: More culturally diverse.

GLENN: More culturally diverse.

VAN JONES: But, less and less economically prosperous.

GLENN: Stop for a second. So he's saying here that we are headed for a nightmare

scenario. Now, let me just say this. As I explain the nightmare scenario, I want

you just to think of these two words: Melting pot. Melting pot. He says we're

headed for a nightmare scenario where we are more and more ethnically diverse,

more and more culturally diverse, and then we have tough economic times. See,

what brings people together is to not separate them by language, by culture, and

by income. These are the guys who said separate by culture. All cultures should

be celebrated equally. There is no American culture. These are the guys who said

teach Spanish. They don't need to learn English. And these are also the people

who are dividing us in class warfare.

So he's describing, what did he say? A nightmare scenario, a recipe for a

battleground. Van, this was your plan from the beginning. Because what you're

describing is what you've done. You're the one saying that it's the white rich

man that is poisoning Hispanics. Your words, not mine. You have been planting

these seeds because you wanted a violent revolution from the beginning. You have

never gone back mainly because no one in the press will force you to answer the

question. Do you now say that a violent overthrow of the United States

government, an oppressive regime your words, not mine is off the table? Are you

now saying that that's not a good idea? Are you now saying I must reject all of

my Communist Manifesto ideas and all of my violent revolutionary ideas that I

was spouting and writing about and encouraging people to do within the last ten

years? Are you now rejecting all of these things, Van Jones? No. No, he's not.

No, he's not. He has just cleansed himself and put on a tie. And he has gone

through the Tides Foundation and the Apollo Alliance and the Center For American

Progress, and they've made him into a legitimate guy by having him speak at all

of the cool universities and get all of the great awards so he can be cleansed.

But he hasn't changed one single view.

So let's just see what we have. Claire McCaskill: Time to get the pitchforks.

Luis Gutierrez saying that there is a coming Latino revolt, and it won't be

beholden to anyone and it will reflect the 1960s. You have Ronald Reagan, Jr.

saying the ends justify the means: Bring guns to fight for social justice, you

have to do what you have to do. And Van Jones outlining the nightmare scenario,

a recipe for a battleground.

 

On the radio program Friday, Glenn Beck discussed the recent news that a primary source for the Steele Dossier — the document on which much of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation was based — had been investigated by the FBI for contacts with suspected Russian spies. Glenn also shared several previously unpublished texts and emails from FBI agents have recently been released.

According to a letter sent by Attorney General William Barr to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday, the FBI knew early on that the research compiled by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele relied on a "Primary Sub-source" that had been "the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011 that assessed his or her contacts with suspected Russian intelligence officers" — but still used it to obtain warrants to spy on former Trump campaign-aide Carter Page.

But, it gets even worse. Now, new leaked texts and communications from FBI agents within the department at the time of the entire Russian collusion effort were disclosed in federal court filings on Thursday. According to the court documents, FBI agents purchased "professional liability insurance" to protect themselves in January 2017, just weeks before Donald Trump was inaugurated president, because they were concerned about the agency's potentially illegal activity during the Russia collusion investigation.

"Trump was right," one FBI employee wrote in response to then-President-elect Trump's Jan 3, 2017 tweet which read: "The 'Intelligence' briefing on so-called 'Russian hacking' was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Chief researcher Jason Buttrill joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to discuss an "explosive" new report released Wednesday by Senate Republicans on Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

Among other serious allegations, the 87-page report claims that "Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow," and the richest woman in Russia.

"The transactions discussed [in the report] are designed to illustrate the depth and extent of some questionable financial transactions. Moreover, the financial transactions illustrate serious counterintelligence and extortion concerns relating to Hunter Biden and his family," the report stated.

Jason suggested the Senate's findings provide additional evidence to back allegations of a money-laundering scheme, which Glenn detailed in a four-part series about Biden's shady connections to Ukraine. Learn more on this here.

"Laundered money is very hard to track to its finality," Jason explained. "I'm sure the Biden camp is really hoping that it just looks suspicious, but [investigators] don't ever find the eventual end point. But, if they do – and it's possible they already have – this is going to be explosive, very explosive."

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Revolutions rarely happen overnight. The Left started laying the groundwork for November 3, 2020, the moment Hillary Clinton had to concede the 2016 election to Donald Trump. It was always solely about getting rid of President Trump — and there's a playbook for that.

Last week, Glenn Beck showed you the "Seven Pillars of Color Revolution" written by a former U.S. diplomat, which are the conditions that must be in place for a successful Eastern European-style "Color Revolution." The left seems to be pushing for a Color Revolution this election because they are using the exact same playbook.

In part two of this series, Glenn peels back the layers on the first four of these Color Revolution pillars to show you how they work and what the end goal is. And he reveals one of the architects of the playbook – a Color Revolution specialist, former ambassador, and former Obama administration official who is one of the key masterminds of this revolution.

Joining Glenn is political campaign veteran and BlazeTV host Steve Deace who says the polls that claim Biden is leading the race "are trash." We're being set up to believe that if Trump wins in spite of the polls, it must be an invalid election.

Watch the full video below:


WATCH all of Glenn's Specials on BlazeTV:

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Save $10 with promo code GLENN.

Sen. Ted Cruz: NOBODY should be afraid of Trump's Supreme Court justice pick

Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Wednesday to weigh in on President Donald Trump's potential Supreme Court nominees and talk about his timely new book, "One Vote Away: How a Single Supreme Court Seat Can Change History."

Sen. Cruz argued that, while Congressional Democrats are outraged over President Trump's chance at a third court appointment, no one on either side should be afraid of a Supreme Court justice being appointed if it's done according to the founding documents. That's why it's crucial that the GOP fills the vacant seat with a true constitutionalist.

Watch the video below to hear the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.