Ayers anger: I never denounced my violence!

Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Extreme broadcast, an exclusive feature

available only to Glenn Beck Insider Extreme members.

Learn more...

GLENN: Holy cow. We have now new audio from Bill Ayers on the WikiLeaks. Do

you have it? This is from

PAT: Yeah, I didn't think it was going already but it is.

GLENN: This is from

TheBlaze.com. It will be posted in a few minutes. This is an

exclusive, I believe from TheBlaze.com right now. It is Bill Ayers talking about WikiLeaks. In it he does not denounce violence of the weather underground. He

compares WikiLeaks to the Weather Underground and, in fact, at one point he's a

little indignant that the radio host tries to imply that he denounces violence.

Here it is.

VOICE: In all of your interviews, especially, you know, around the election, you

always had to open up by denouncing the violence inflicted by the Weather

Underground and what we were wondering, which never got talked about, is what

actually drove you guys during that era? What drove these activists that you

knew to such extreme measures?

AYERS: I'm let me just start by saying I'm not certain I understood the

beginning of your question. You said always denounced the violence of the

Weather Underground?

VOICE: Well, yeah. It seemed like, it seemed like you always

AYERS: I don't remember that.

VOICE: Well, it seemed like you always had to open up by being like it was very,

you know, regrettable and so forth.

AYERS: I don't believe I ever said it's regrettable, but so

PAT: I don't think he has, either.

AYERS: I'll tell you I'll answer your question but I don't quite agree with the

way you set it up because actually what I've consistently, including in

everything I've written, is that there is no question that the Weather

Underground crossed, you know, lines of legality and I sometimes say we crossed

lines of common sense in certain ways, but I never denounce what we did. And the

reason is because in the context of those times and what was going on


TheBlaze:


‘I Never Denounced’ W.U. Violence: Ayers Compares Weather Underground to

WikiLeaks

GLENN: The ends justify the means.

AYERS: I actually think that we were very restrained, and I've always thought

that, and I still think it. So but what drove us to it? Well, I would say this:

That I was one simple way to say it is in a story. I was first arrested opposing

the war in Vietnam in 1965.

GLENN: You are hearing Bill Ayers, brand audio.

AYERS: At that point, something like 80% of Americans supported the war,

something like 10, 15% opposed the war. Over the next three years activism

became much more intense, much more public. I participated in a lot of it. A lot

of organizing went on against the war. I think the most violent force then and

even more violent today is the U.S. Government. Do I think what we did was

brilliant? Not really. Do I think it was horrendous? Absolutely not. You compare

6,000 people in one week being murdered by my government to, you know, an

escalated piece of vandalism against a military computer inside the Pentagon,

there's no comparison. And to kind of focus on the Weather Underground as this

violent, unbelievably out of control, I think it reminds me, if you put it in

today's context, here we have WikiLeaks describing, you know, revealing all the

incredible things going on. The real assault on democracy by our government in a

systematic way. And how does the news media cover it? Oh, my gosh, it's leaking,

it's dishonest. Who's dishonest in this picture? Who's the liar in this picture?

Who's the force for oppression and exploitation? Well, in my view if you look at

the Sixties and you look at the Seventies, the Weather Underground was not only

restrained, we were temperate, we were not particularly violent. We destroyed

some property.

GLENN: Can you stop for a second? I just said this, I looked at Pat when I'm

listening to him and I'm saying, this is all set up. This is a setup. This

Julian Assange thing, when did we know he was coming out with things?

PAT: Was it August?

GLENN: I think it was a little before August.

PAT: Maybe, maybe before that.

STU: Well, he had the war stuff over the summer and then it's been more recent.

Recent stuff.

GLENN: So we knew. Why did he wait until now? Does anybody know?

PAT: Christmas Gift for the left?

GLENN: Why did he wait until now?

PAT: Stocking stuffer?

GLENN: Why? Why? Why would you wait on that? Why would you sit on that stuff?

STU: I think I've heard him I could be wrong on this but I think he wanted

separation to some degree.

GLENN: From?

STU: From the other stuff that he released, the war stuff, which is why he's

supposedly trickling it out now instead of just releasing it all at once, have

more impact. I don't know if you buy that, but that's been something tossed

around.

GLENN: I just find it, I find it really interesting. Listen. Bill Ayers, no

matter what he says, is a friend of Barack Obama and Barack Obama's allies. They

may not be close friends but they know each other. They worked in the same damn

building one door away. They were on the same board. They lived in the same

neighborhood. They know each other. They're friends. I'm not saying that they're

having, you know, nacho parties and watching football games on the weekend, but

they are friends. Bill Ayers, without a shadow of a doubt, is friends with many

people surrounding this president.

Now, Bill Ayers is now coming out now, listen. Because what's happening here? We

are taking down this regime, if you will. Well, who's in charge? Who's in

charge? Barack Obama, right? Well, if you take down this regime, wouldn't you be

taking down Barack Obama? Or are we just taking down America? Because, as I told

you before, they are building a structure and they need to have the structure

completed before it collapses. I've told you they are preparing. They have. The

only piece left is the media and the military. Now, I don't know what their

military plan is, but I do know what their media plan is. Because you can find

it on The Blaze. We just played we did it for about 45 minutes today, playing

the audio. Listen to the commissioner of the FCC. He wants to control television

and the characters on television.

The only thing left is the media and the military. I know what they are planning

on doing in the media, and that happens December 20th or 21st? The FCC goes

against the wishes of congress and against federal judges and they are going to

do Internet, what do you call it?

PAT: Net neutrality.

GLENN: Net neutrality through, if you remember I said the most dangerous man in

America is Cass Sunstein, our regulatory czar. He controls and writes all the

regulations. Once you make congress irrelevant, it's all about regulations and

paperwork. So what are they doing on December 20th? They are changing the

federal regulations on the Internet. They will regulate it through the FCC. Cass

Sunstein. We will show you, you can read about it more on TheBlaze.com about the

military and what is happening currently with the military. The military has

been doing military exercises and we are tracking all of this stuff down and we

are going to do probably an hour special on it tomorrow night. But all of the

pieces are in place. So Barack Obama doesn't collapse in the system. The people

remember, bottom up, cause chaos, get people to march in the streets. Cause

chaos. Cause a, what was it Soros says in Step Number 3, what he did to all the

other nations? You cause distrust of the government. And you get people to march

out in the streets. You cause collapse and the people want it to stop, and they

will cry out. And that's when the top comes down that coordinated the bottom

riots. This is Czechoslovakia 1948. This is America 2011. Bottom up, top down.

Turn it inside out. Their own words they are saying these things now. You just

have to believe that there was somebody that would be willing to do this. Here

is Bill Ayers. It just screams coordination to me. Here is Bill Ayers saying

that the Weather Underground is the same as WikiLeaks. It's the same, their

goals are the same. You have the communists go to NZpatriot.com today and look

at the list of the communist parties all around the world that have come out and

said, yes, we're behind WikiLeaks. Why? Chaos.

Do you remember the show I did three, four months ago and I had the whole

spectrum and I had anarchists and communists. One side was communist and the

other side was anarchists. Well, what do the anarchists have in common? Why

would the communists be fueling the anarchists? Why would they do it? Because

they know that anarchy leads to people crying out and saying stop it, just make

it go away. Bring sanity. They are going to collapse this whole damn world. They

are going to collapse the whole damn world.

So you know, this isn't a WikiLeaks is doing this. He was arrested in Great

Britain. This is not an American problem. This is why I've said to you that

they're so far beyond what you thought, what I thought and I will tell you now

and I haven't told this story before. I have had one moment of real fear, real

fear, and it was the moment that I found buried in a bill that passed under

George W. Bush pieces of this FCC regulation. It's when I knew they were

building a structure and I knew they were way ahead because this piece of this

FCC structure made no sense by itself. It was buried in another bill. A

researcher called me about 11:00 at night and said, Glenn, I found it. When did

it pass? Believe it or not, it passed under George W. Bush. Dear God help us. I

realize this isn't about Barack Obama. This isn't about anything. This is about

radicals that have laid in wait. What is the beginning of H. G. Wells and War of

the Worlds? That we have been studied. Eyes, envious eyes watching and studying,

laying in wait. That's when I wrote to Sarah Palin. Sarah Palin and I had been

texting each other all night and I wrote to her and I said, I am for the first

time afraid. And she called me back like at 2:00 in the morning and we were on

the phone for about an hour. And I said, Sarah, this has been in the works for a

very long time. They're way ahead. Way ahead. And this was the moment that I she

actually talked me down from the tree because this is a moment when I said just

never, never going to beat it. You're never going to beat it. And I'm not going

to be the guy I'm not going to be the guy. And she talked to me for quite a

while: You've got to stay in the game. You've got to stay in the game. She was a

real blessing to me. I don't even know if she even remembers that. I'm sure she

does. Since that time I have learned so much of, A, how far ahead they are but,

B, how to defeat them. I know how to defeat them. And the way to do it is they

think you are going to zig. You must zag. They do not the darkness will not

understand the light. It is your only cover. It is your only cover.

We did our homework over the weekend; we did the research so we can tell you what is likely coming from Senate Democrats regarding President Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett. Based on our research and the anonymous people who have already come forward to talk about Coney Barrett's youth, these are the main shocking things you can expect Senate Democrats to seize on during the confirmation process…

A man has come forward under the banner of "#MenToo," to say that in second grade, Amy Coney Barrett and her best friend at the time, cornered him at a birthday party at Chuck-E-Cheese and "injected him with a full dose of cooties." Which, if true, would obviously be disqualifying for serving on the highest court in the land.

Then there's a woman who says when she was nine-years-old, she lived on the same street as Amy Coney Barrett. She alleges that Coney-Barrett borrowed her VHS tape of Herbie Goes Bananas and did not return it for at least six months. And then when she did finally get the tape back, the woman says Coney Barrett did not even bother to rewind it. The FBI has interviewed at least two witnesses so far who say the tape was indeed not rewound and that it was very upsetting to the owner of the tape. Again, if true, this is troubling – clearly not the kind of integrity you want to see in a Supreme Court justice.

Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it.

The same neighbor also dropped a bombshell allegation about the drinking problem of Amy Coney Barrett and her closest friends. Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it. The neighbor says she "frequently" witnessed Coney-Barrett and her friends chugging entire cartons of milk – often Whole Milk, sometimes Chocolate Milk, occasionally both at the same time through a funnel.

Unfortunately, shooting-up cooties, injurious rewinding, and potential calcium-abuse are not even the worst of it.

A third person has now come forward, another man, and this is just reprehensible, it's hard to even fathom. But he alleges that in fourth grade, when they were around ten-years-old, Amy Coney Barrett and a group of "four or five of her friends" gang-GRAPED him on the playground during recess. He alleges the group of friends snuck uneaten grapes out of the cafeteria and gang-GRAPED him repeatedly in broad daylight. In other words, and I hate to have to spell this out because it's kind of graphic, but the group led by ten-year-old Amy Coney Barrett pelted this poor defenseless boy with whole grapes. He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

Obviously, even if just one of these allegations is half-true, no Senator with a conscience could possibly vote to confirm Coney Barrett. When there is a clear pattern of destructive childhood behavior, it always continues into adulthood. Because people do not change. Ever.

Fortunately, for the sake of the Republic, Democrats plan to subpoena Coney Barrett's childhood diary, to see what, if any, insights it may provide into her calcium habits, as well as her abuse of illicit cooties and the gang-GRAPING incident.

We will keep you posted on the latest, but for now, it looks like Democrats will find plenty in the reckless pre-teen life of Amy Coney Barrett to cast doubt on her nomination. And if not, they can always fall back on her deranged preference for letting babies be born.

[NOTE: The preceding was a parody written by MRA writer Nathan Nipper.]

On the radio program Friday, Glenn Beck discussed the recent news that a primary source for the Steele Dossier — the document on which much of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation was based — had been investigated by the FBI for contacts with suspected Russian spies. Glenn also shared several previously unpublished texts and emails from FBI agents have recently been released.

According to a letter sent by Attorney General William Barr to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday, the FBI knew early on that the research compiled by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele relied on a "Primary Sub-source" that had been "the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011 that assessed his or her contacts with suspected Russian intelligence officers" — but still used it to obtain warrants to spy on former Trump campaign-aide Carter Page.

But, it gets even worse. Now, new leaked texts and communications from FBI agents within the department at the time of the entire Russian collusion effort were disclosed in federal court filings on Thursday. According to the court documents, FBI agents purchased "professional liability insurance" to protect themselves in January 2017, just weeks before Donald Trump was inaugurated president, because they were concerned about the agency's potentially illegal activity during the Russia collusion investigation.

"Trump was right," one FBI employee wrote in response to then-President-elect Trump's Jan 3, 2017 tweet which read: "The 'Intelligence' briefing on so-called 'Russian hacking' was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Chief researcher Jason Buttrill joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to discuss an "explosive" new report released Wednesday by Senate Republicans on Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

Among other serious allegations, the 87-page report claims that "Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow," and the richest woman in Russia.

"The transactions discussed [in the report] are designed to illustrate the depth and extent of some questionable financial transactions. Moreover, the financial transactions illustrate serious counterintelligence and extortion concerns relating to Hunter Biden and his family," the report stated.

Jason suggested the Senate's findings provide additional evidence to back allegations of a money-laundering scheme, which Glenn detailed in a four-part series about Biden's shady connections to Ukraine. Learn more on this here.

"Laundered money is very hard to track to its finality," Jason explained. "I'm sure the Biden camp is really hoping that it just looks suspicious, but [investigators] don't ever find the eventual end point. But, if they do – and it's possible they already have – this is going to be explosive, very explosive."

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Revolutions rarely happen overnight. The Left started laying the groundwork for November 3, 2020, the moment Hillary Clinton had to concede the 2016 election to Donald Trump. It was always solely about getting rid of President Trump — and there's a playbook for that.

Last week, Glenn Beck showed you the "Seven Pillars of Color Revolution" written by a former U.S. diplomat, which are the conditions that must be in place for a successful Eastern European-style "Color Revolution." The left seems to be pushing for a Color Revolution this election because they are using the exact same playbook.

In part two of this series, Glenn peels back the layers on the first four of these Color Revolution pillars to show you how they work and what the end goal is. And he reveals one of the architects of the playbook – a Color Revolution specialist, former ambassador, and former Obama administration official who is one of the key masterminds of this revolution.

Joining Glenn is political campaign veteran and BlazeTV host Steve Deace who says the polls that claim Biden is leading the race "are trash." We're being set up to believe that if Trump wins in spite of the polls, it must be an invalid election.

Watch the full video below:


WATCH all of Glenn's Specials on BlazeTV:

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Save $10 with promo code GLENN.