Democrats are racist?

GLENN: Now, let me add this one in. As I'm watching the highlights of the Democratic debates from the other night, the first thing that comes to mind is, how is this even a contest? How is this even close? And I mean this sincerely. If you're a Democrat, how could you possibly even entertain the possibility of running Hillary Clinton or voting for Hillary Clinton over Barack Obama? How is that even a possibility? And by the way, just so you know, it's not some sort of reverse psychology thing. I'm just not that smart I'm not secretly afraid of Hillary Clinton. I don't secretly think that Obama is actually more beatable. I think Barack Obama, because most people won't even listen to his policies, most people will say, it says a lot about me; I voted for the first African-American. They are going to run in droves to vote for Barack Obama. And the truth is Barack Obama is 400,000 times the candidate that Hillary is. He's a much better speaker. He can ignite the imagination of people. I like him. I think his policies may come directly from hell. I think Stalin may be down in the bowels of the Earth going, "Wait, wait, wait, Barack, say this one." I mean, but I like him. I mean, I'm going to have to check his campaign finance laws because, you know, running Hillary Clinton, you know, over Barack Obama I think could actually be seen as a donation to the Republican party. Maybe it's just me. Maybe Democrats know something that we don't. Maybe they think you'll melt down under the pressure, but I don't see any signs of it. He doesn't have that much baggage and the baggage that he does, he admits to. He's smooth, he's smart, he's a significant portion of the population who will -- there's a significant portion of the population that will actually vote for him because, "Look how tolerant I am." He's obviously much more to beat than Hillary Clinton, seriously. Every Republican in the universe is cheering on Hillary Clinton like their kid in a little league game, "Go, Hillary, run! Keep running, you can make it!" In fact, if I may take a page directly out of the Democratic handbook here, I mean, seriously why won't the Democrats give the nomination to Obama? It must be racism. It must -- what else could it possibly be? What else could it possibly be besides racism? I mean, there's this wide of a chasm between the white candidate and the far superior black candidate? Are you kidding me? They're not even close. We're supposed to expect change from her? She just came from the White House and then she went to the capitol and then she went back to the White House. You're kidding me. Who's the one that's exciting the imagination? Who's the one that conservatives are saying, I don't know, I mean, he's got the same kind of charisma of Ronald Reagan, and he's losing, to the pants suit? You're kidding me, right? Democrats, you just hate black people. It's the only choice I can come up with. It's the only possible reason: You are just racist. You hate black people. It's amazing. It's amazing.

I mean, when the Republicans have great black candidates, we beg them to get in the race. How many times did we have to beg Colin Powell or Condi Rice, please, run for President, please, please run. They never listen to us. So we beg them to be Secretary of State or nominate them to the Supreme Court. Damn, our racism. But what's your excuse, you tolerant Progressives? You can't possibly -- I mean, there is absolutely no way that you are looking at the same two people that I'm looking at. And then having a tough time deciding between the two. There's no way you're looking at these two people and go, "I don't know, it's pretty close." They're not close. I don't agree with either of them. I don't want either of them to be in the White House. I don't want either of them to be President of the United States President of the United States) So I can confidently say, "Run, Hillary, run." It's like Forrest. "Run, Hillary, run!" But at some point if I'm a Democrat voting for Hillary, I probably would start to wonder, why am I voting for the person who Glenn Beck wants me to vote for? And the answer to that, of course, is racism. You're racist. Celebrate. This is not going to last long. As soon as they decide, then we're going to become the racists. As soon as we say what they're saying about Barack Obama, we're racist. But right now we could say that about them. It's great. It's great. We haven't had this opportunity very often, you know. As long as they keep the African-American down in his place, they love the African-American. But as soon as that African-American starts to run and challenges the establishment and he's far superior than the established white person, hey, hey, hey, hey, whoa, whoa, whoa. I love living as a Democrat. This is the best thing ever. You don't even have to make sense. You could just... "Racist!" It's great. "Oh, see you're wearing a Hillary button. What a hate mongering racist!" Don't worry. It will come back around. As soon as -- if they pick Barack Obama, which they won't because, you know, they're racists! If they pick Barack Obama and they have him up as the presidential candidate, then we'll be the racists because we disagree with his policies. But right now the liberals are racists! And I think it's fantastic. I really do.

Everything comes down to the two Senate runoffs in Georgia. If we lose both races, we lose the country. Democrats know this and are pouring in millions to usher in a Marxist agenda.

As the Left tries to hide how radical the two candidates really are, Glenn takes us inside the Democrat war room to expose the wolf in pastor's clothing, Raphael Warnock, and America's Justin Trudeau, Jon Ossoff. Socialism, the Green New Deal, and "defund the police" are all on the table. And Glenn warns of what's to come if conservatives don't activate: Chuck Schumer will weaponize the Senate, and the radical Left will launch an all-out assault to ravage the Constitution.

Watch the full special below:

The election and its aftermath are the most important stories in America. That's why we're offering our most timely discount ever: $30 off a one-year subscription to BlazeTV with code "GLENN." With BlazeTV, you get the unvarnished truth from the most pro-America network in the country, free from Big Tech and MSM censors.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" to explain how mail-in ballots are typically disqualified during recounts at a far higher rate than in-person, Election Day ballots, and why this is "good news" for President Donald Trump's legal battle over the election.

"One of the things that gives the greatest cause for optimism is, this election ... there's a pretty marked disparity in terms of how the votes were distributed. On Election Day, with in-person voting, Donald Trump won a significant majority of the votes cast on in-person voting on Election Day. Of mail-in voting, Joe Biden won a significant majority of the votes cast early on mail-in voting," Cruz explained.

"Now, here's the good news: If you look historically to recounts, if you look historically to election litigation, the votes cast in person on Election Day tend to stand. It's sort of hard to screw that up. Those votes are generally legal, and they're not set aside. Mail-in votes historically have a much higher rate of rejection … when they're examined, there are a whole series of legal requirements that vary state by state, but mail-in votes consistently have a higher rate of rejection, which suggests that as these votes begin being examined and subjected to scrutiny, that you're going to see Joe Biden's vote tallies go down. That's a good thing," he added. "The challenge is, for President Trump to prevail, he's got to run the table. He's got to win, not just in one state but in several states. That makes it a lot harder to prevail in the litigation. I hope that he does so, but it is a real challenge and we shouldn't try to convince ourselves otherwise."

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Subscribe to BlazeTV today with our BEST DEAL EVER for $30 off with promo code GLENN.

Fox News senior meteorologist Janice Dean is perhaps even more disgusted with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) for his coronavirus response than BlazeTV's Stu Burguiere (read what Stu has to say on the subject here), and for a good reason.

She lost both of her in-laws to COVID-19 in New York's nursing homes after Gov. Cuomo's infamous nursing home mandate, which Cuomo has since had scrubbed from the state's website and blamed everyone from the New York Post to nursing care workers to (every leftist's favorite scapegoat) President Donald Trump.

Janice joined Glenn and Stu on the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday to ask why mainstream media is not holding Gov. Cuomo — who recently published a book about his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic — accountable?

"I'm vocal because I have not seen the mainstream media ask these questions or demand accountability of their leaders. [Cuomo] really has been ruling with an iron fist, and every time he does get asked a question, he blames everybody else except the person that signed that order," Janice said.

"In my mind, he's profiting off the over 30 thousand New Yorkers, including my in-laws, that died by publishing a book on 'leadership' of New York," she added. "His order has helped kill thousands of relatives of New York state. And this is not political, Glenn. This is not about Republican or Democrat. My in-laws were registered Democrats. This is not about politics. This is about accountability for something that went wrong, and it's because of your [Cuomo's] leadership that we're put into this situation."

Watch the video excerpt from the show below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

As America grows divided and afraid to disagree with the Democrats' woke plan for America, Megyn Kelly is ready to fight back for the truth. For nearly two decades, she navigated the volatile and broken world of the media. But as America leans on independent voices more than ever, she's breaking new ground with "The Megyn Kelly Show."

She joined the latest Glenn Beck Podcast to break down what's coming next after the election: Black Lives Matter is mainstream, leftists are making lists of Trump supporters, and the Hunter Biden scandal is on the back burner.

Megyn and Glenn reminisce about their cable news days (including her infamous run-in with then-presidential candidate Donald Trump) and to look into the chaotic and shady world of journalism and the growing entitlement it's bred. For example, many conservatives have been shocked by how Fox News handled the election.

Megyn defended Fox News, saying she believes Fox News' mission "is a good one," but also didn't hold back on hosts like Neil Cavuto, who cut off a White House briefing to fact check it — something she never would have done, even while covering President Obama.

Megyn also shared this insightful takeaway from her time at NBC: "Jane Fonda was an ass."

Watch the full podcast here:

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.