Exposed: Hillary's racist agenda

GLENN: Okay. So you've got the Barack Hussein Obama attack phone calls and then you have Bill Clinton out saying that this whole thing with Obama is a fairy tale. Really? What do you mean by that, Bill Clinton? I'm just trying to think like you have always taught me to think when I examine people's positions and their words. I immediately think if I disagree with you, you must be a racist. So what did you mean by that? Is it that a black man in a position of power is a mythical tale? Is that it? Is that real life to you? Is it separate water fountains for you, Mr. Clinton? I don't understand. It's a fairy tale.

Then Hillary Clinton -- and don't try to pass this off because we know exactly what she means. Then Hillary Clinton said in a speech that Obama hasn't done the spade work necessary. Wonder what that means. I mean, I could look up the definition of "Spade work." In fact, Stu, you did, didn't you?

STU: Yeah, apparently I guess they're working with the dictionary, yeah. They're in on it because it just says dull or routine preliminary work preparing for an undertaking." I think you understand.

GLENN: I don't think he is preparing for an undertaking, really? Oh, he's an undertaking. What does that mean? Is that a threat or is that a job that only somebody like Barack Hussein Obama should have? What do you mean by spade work, racist?

Then if you really want to get into real policy, this is where -- look. You could say, okay, fairy tale, he wasn't really talking about, spade work, she wasn't really talking about, Barack Hussein Obama, they weren't really -- you could say all of that, you could dismiss all of that. But then let's look at the hard facts of the policies. When we see the inherent racism in their policies, you know who the Clintons are. You don't need to say any more. The debate is over. We know what their intent was on the statements but let's look at their actual policies.

She talks about universal healthcare, right? She says she wants to get everybody covered. Well, isn't that convenient? She wants to get everyone covered. Hmmm. That policy will cover three times as many whites as will blacks. The vast majority of the increased coverage of her policy will benefit whites. 48% of the uninsured are white. Only 15% are black. Who's the racist here? Isn't that -- I mean, I'm sorry. I'm just trying to use the arguments that they would use against conservatives because that's what they do on tax cuts. We say we want tax cuts for everybody. Reduce the taxes for everybody. But then they pick one group to vilify and say it only benefits the rich. All right. Well, I could play that game. The vast majority of universal health coverage will go to whites. Why would you do that? Why, why have something so lopsided that it's only benefitting, really only benefitting 15% of the African-American community? And then you come out and talk to me about spade work? Excuse me, racist. The only possible answer here, racism. She says pulling the troops out would be good for the soldiers. Really? Another policy from Hillary Clinton. Or would it just be good for... whites. The policy, her own racist policy that she wants to incorporate and institutionalize racism. Her policy of pulling the troops out benefits whites 6:1 over blacks. 71% of our Army is white. 11% is black. Her policies are only becoming more racist as we start to look at them.

Look at the tax policy. She says she wants to raise taxes on the rich. Really? Or does she want to raise taxes on blacks and Hispanics? To pick one industry that has wealthy people that would be affected, hmmm. Rich people. Really, really rich people. Who's really, really rich? I mean, making a lot of money. You know who the first group of people that come to my mind? But maybe that's because I'm not racist and so I can see clearly racist thoughts? The top ten highest paid athletes. Seven of them are black. One is Hispanic. It would cost minorities. Her taxes on the rich where these people have come from the inner city and had absolutely no future in most cases and they pulled themselves up and they got themselves into college and they worked hard and they did everything they could to leave the inner city behind and they become wealthy and they live the American dream and what does she want to do to them? Punish them! Why? Because they're black or Hispanic. Seven out of ten are black. One is Hispanic. Tell me about your tax cut, little miss racist. It will cost minorities $16 million while costing whites only... hmmm. Why are we letting the white man loose? Shouldn't the white man pay his fair share. The support that has outwardly criticized Clarence Thomas, Condi Rice, Colin Powell. There is a pattern here. She hates coal. Do I need to spell it out for you? Coal is black. Oil, black. She hates Halliburton. Number one job of Halliburton, they put out fires. When there's a fire in a building, what's left of the building is what color? Say it with me! Black! Why is it she hates all things black? Bill is the first "Black President." Really? He's the first black President? He still looks white to me. Is he perhaps ashamed of his black heritage because I have seen some of his applications that he's filled out for jobs in the past. He lists himself as white. Hmmm. Interesting. Ashamed of being black. Bill has only cheated on Hillary, that we know of, with white women. Is it perhaps the reason that we've all wondered, why is she staying with him? Why would she put up with that? We've all thought that it's because she could use him in the role that he's playing right now and help getting her elected. Or is it perhaps now that we know her real feelings on African-Americans, is it perhaps that she says, "Yeah, but he's as racist as I am. He's not going to sleep around with any black women. At least he's not hurting the purity of the race." Perhaps. I don't know! But look at the long history of racism.

How about this one. What was the big scandal that the Clintons were in in the beginning? What was it? Whitewater. And what did they do during the entire Whitewater scandal? They defended it. Defending Whitewater. Saying there was nothing wrong with Whitewater. It was all okay if the water was white, but now, but now we see something entirely different. Now, now that our eyes are opened, we can understand the defense of Whitewater in context and so many years later. She's suspiciously against Blackwater. So water is okay if it's white. It's evil, wrong and must be stopped if it's black. Could their racism be any more. I'm just the messenger. I'm just laying out the facts. You'll have to decide whether Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton are truly racist but it goes so far beyond. It really goes to how the people are that claim they're for these policies. Who are these people that say, no, I just like some of her policies; I'm not a racist. Well, isn't that exactly what a racist would say? I wonder why there are so many people in the Democratic party that just want to keep Barack Obama down when he's clearly the superior candidate. Seems to me, especially when you look at the awful facts, let alone the whole Whitewater/Blackwater thing. The answer is... the racism.

On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Monday, Harvard Law professor and lawyer on President Donald Trump's impeachment defense team Alan Dershowitz explains the history of impeachment and its process, why the framers did not include abuse of power as criteria for a Constitutional impeachment, why the Democrats are framing their case the way they are, and what to look for in the upcoming Senate trial.

Dershowitz argued that "abuse of power" -- one of two articles of impeachment against Trump approved by House Democrats last month -- is not an impeachable act.

"There are two articles of impeachment. The second is 'obstruction of Congress.' That's just a false accusation," said Dershowitz. "But they also charge him, in the Ukraine matter, with abuse of power. But abuse of power was discussed by the framers (of the U.S. Constitution) ... the framers refused to include abuse of power because it was too broad, too open-ended.

"In the words of James Madison, the father of our Constitution, it would lead presidents to serve at the will of Congress. And that's exactly what the framers didn't want, which is why they were very specific and said a president can be impeached only for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors," he added.

"What's alleged against President Trump is not criminal," added Dershowitz. "If they had criminal issues to allege, you can be sure they would have done it. If they could establish bribery or treason, they would have done it already. But they didn't do it. They instead used this concept of abuse of power, which is so broad and general ... any president could be charged with it."

Watch the video below to hear more details:



Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

On Friday's radio program, Bill O'Reilly joins Glenn Beck discuss the possible outcomes for the Democrats in 2020.

Why are former President Barack and First Lady Michelle Obama working overtime to convince Americans they're more moderate than most of the far-left Democratic presidential candidates? Is there a chance of a Michelle Obama vs. Donald Trump race this fall?

O'Reilly surmised that a post-primary nomination would probably be more of a "Bloomberg play." He said Michael Bloomberg might actually stand a chance at the Democratic nomination if there is a brokered convention, as many Democratic leaders are fearfully anticipating.

"Bloomberg knows he doesn't really have a chance to get enough delegates to win," O'Reilly said. "He's doing two things: If there's a brokered convention, there he is. And even if there is a nominee, it will probably be Biden, and Biden will give [him] Secretary of State or Secretary of Treasury. That's what Bloomberg wants."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.


On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Friday, award-winning investigative reporter John Solomon, a central figure in the impeachment proceedings, explained his newly filed lawsuit, which seeks the records of contact between Ukraine prosecutors and the U.S. Embassy officials in Kiev during the 2016 election.

The records would provide valuable information on what really happened in Ukraine, including what then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter were doing with Ukrainian energy company, Burisma Holdings, Solomon explained.

The documents, which the State Department has withheld thus far despite repeated requests for release by Solomon, would likely shed light on the alleged corruption that President Donald Trump requested to be investigated during his phone call with the president of Ukraine last year.

With the help of Southeastern Legal Foundation, Solomon's lawsuit seeks to compel the State Department to release the critical records. Once released, the records are expected to reveal, once and for all, exactly why President Trump wanted to investigate the dealings in Ukraine, and finally expose the side of the story that Democrats are trying to hide in their push for impeachment.

"It's been a one-sided story so far, just like the beginning of the Russia collusion story, right? Everybody was certain on Jan. 9 of 2017 that the Christopher Steele dossier was gospel. And our president was an agent of Russia. Three years later, we learned that all of that turned out to be bunk, " Solomon said.

"The most important thing about politics, and about investigations, is that there are two sides to a story. There are two pieces of evidence. And right now, we've only seen one side of it," he continued. "I think we'll learn a lot about what the intelligence community, what the economic and Treasury Department community was telling the president. And I bet the story was way more complicated than the narrative that [House Intelligence Committee Chairman] Adam Schiff [D-Calif.] has woven so far."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Carter Page, a former advisor to Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, found himself at the center of the Russia probe and had his reputation and career destroyed by what we now know were lies from our own intelligence system and the media.

On the TV show Thursday, Page joined Glenn Beck to speak out about how he became the subject of illegal electronic surveillance by the FBI for more than two years, and revealed the extent of the corruption that has infiltrated our legal systems and our country as a whole.

"To me, the bigger issue is how much damage this has done to our country," Page told Glenn. "I've been very patient in trying to ... find help with finding solutions and correcting this terrible thing which has happened to our country, our judicial system, DOJ, FBI -- these once-great institutions. And my bigger concern is the fact that, although we keep taking these steps forward in terms of these important findings, it really remains the tip of the iceberg."

Page was referencing the report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, which revealed that the FBI made "at least 17 significant errors or omissions" in its Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications for warrants to spy on Page, a U.S. citizen.

"I think this needs to be attacked from all angles," Glenn said. "The one angle I'm interested in from you is, please tell me you have the biggest badass attorneys that are hungry, starving, maybe are a little low to pay their Mercedes payments right now, and are just gearing up to come after the government and the media. Are they?"

I can confirm that that is the case," Page replied.

Watch the video clip below for a preview of the full-length interview:

The full interview will air on January 30th for Blaze TV subscribers, and February 1st on YouTube and wherever you get your podcast.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.