Exposed: Hillary's racist agenda

GLENN: Okay. So you've got the Barack Hussein Obama attack phone calls and then you have Bill Clinton out saying that this whole thing with Obama is a fairy tale. Really? What do you mean by that, Bill Clinton? I'm just trying to think like you have always taught me to think when I examine people's positions and their words. I immediately think if I disagree with you, you must be a racist. So what did you mean by that? Is it that a black man in a position of power is a mythical tale? Is that it? Is that real life to you? Is it separate water fountains for you, Mr. Clinton? I don't understand. It's a fairy tale.

Then Hillary Clinton -- and don't try to pass this off because we know exactly what she means. Then Hillary Clinton said in a speech that Obama hasn't done the spade work necessary. Wonder what that means. I mean, I could look up the definition of "Spade work." In fact, Stu, you did, didn't you?

STU: Yeah, apparently I guess they're working with the dictionary, yeah. They're in on it because it just says dull or routine preliminary work preparing for an undertaking." I think you understand.

GLENN: I don't think he is preparing for an undertaking, really? Oh, he's an undertaking. What does that mean? Is that a threat or is that a job that only somebody like Barack Hussein Obama should have? What do you mean by spade work, racist?

Then if you really want to get into real policy, this is where -- look. You could say, okay, fairy tale, he wasn't really talking about, spade work, she wasn't really talking about, Barack Hussein Obama, they weren't really -- you could say all of that, you could dismiss all of that. But then let's look at the hard facts of the policies. When we see the inherent racism in their policies, you know who the Clintons are. You don't need to say any more. The debate is over. We know what their intent was on the statements but let's look at their actual policies.

She talks about universal healthcare, right? She says she wants to get everybody covered. Well, isn't that convenient? She wants to get everyone covered. Hmmm. That policy will cover three times as many whites as will blacks. The vast majority of the increased coverage of her policy will benefit whites. 48% of the uninsured are white. Only 15% are black. Who's the racist here? Isn't that -- I mean, I'm sorry. I'm just trying to use the arguments that they would use against conservatives because that's what they do on tax cuts. We say we want tax cuts for everybody. Reduce the taxes for everybody. But then they pick one group to vilify and say it only benefits the rich. All right. Well, I could play that game. The vast majority of universal health coverage will go to whites. Why would you do that? Why, why have something so lopsided that it's only benefitting, really only benefitting 15% of the African-American community? And then you come out and talk to me about spade work? Excuse me, racist. The only possible answer here, racism. She says pulling the troops out would be good for the soldiers. Really? Another policy from Hillary Clinton. Or would it just be good for... whites. The policy, her own racist policy that she wants to incorporate and institutionalize racism. Her policy of pulling the troops out benefits whites 6:1 over blacks. 71% of our Army is white. 11% is black. Her policies are only becoming more racist as we start to look at them.

Look at the tax policy. She says she wants to raise taxes on the rich. Really? Or does she want to raise taxes on blacks and Hispanics? To pick one industry that has wealthy people that would be affected, hmmm. Rich people. Really, really rich people. Who's really, really rich? I mean, making a lot of money. You know who the first group of people that come to my mind? But maybe that's because I'm not racist and so I can see clearly racist thoughts? The top ten highest paid athletes. Seven of them are black. One is Hispanic. It would cost minorities. Her taxes on the rich where these people have come from the inner city and had absolutely no future in most cases and they pulled themselves up and they got themselves into college and they worked hard and they did everything they could to leave the inner city behind and they become wealthy and they live the American dream and what does she want to do to them? Punish them! Why? Because they're black or Hispanic. Seven out of ten are black. One is Hispanic. Tell me about your tax cut, little miss racist. It will cost minorities $16 million while costing whites only... hmmm. Why are we letting the white man loose? Shouldn't the white man pay his fair share. The support that has outwardly criticized Clarence Thomas, Condi Rice, Colin Powell. There is a pattern here. She hates coal. Do I need to spell it out for you? Coal is black. Oil, black. She hates Halliburton. Number one job of Halliburton, they put out fires. When there's a fire in a building, what's left of the building is what color? Say it with me! Black! Why is it she hates all things black? Bill is the first "Black President." Really? He's the first black President? He still looks white to me. Is he perhaps ashamed of his black heritage because I have seen some of his applications that he's filled out for jobs in the past. He lists himself as white. Hmmm. Interesting. Ashamed of being black. Bill has only cheated on Hillary, that we know of, with white women. Is it perhaps the reason that we've all wondered, why is she staying with him? Why would she put up with that? We've all thought that it's because she could use him in the role that he's playing right now and help getting her elected. Or is it perhaps now that we know her real feelings on African-Americans, is it perhaps that she says, "Yeah, but he's as racist as I am. He's not going to sleep around with any black women. At least he's not hurting the purity of the race." Perhaps. I don't know! But look at the long history of racism.

How about this one. What was the big scandal that the Clintons were in in the beginning? What was it? Whitewater. And what did they do during the entire Whitewater scandal? They defended it. Defending Whitewater. Saying there was nothing wrong with Whitewater. It was all okay if the water was white, but now, but now we see something entirely different. Now, now that our eyes are opened, we can understand the defense of Whitewater in context and so many years later. She's suspiciously against Blackwater. So water is okay if it's white. It's evil, wrong and must be stopped if it's black. Could their racism be any more. I'm just the messenger. I'm just laying out the facts. You'll have to decide whether Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton are truly racist but it goes so far beyond. It really goes to how the people are that claim they're for these policies. Who are these people that say, no, I just like some of her policies; I'm not a racist. Well, isn't that exactly what a racist would say? I wonder why there are so many people in the Democratic party that just want to keep Barack Obama down when he's clearly the superior candidate. Seems to me, especially when you look at the awful facts, let alone the whole Whitewater/Blackwater thing. The answer is... the racism.

We did our homework over the weekend; we did the research so we can tell you what is likely coming from Senate Democrats regarding President Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett. Based on our research and the anonymous people who have already come forward to talk about Coney Barrett's youth, these are the main shocking things you can expect Senate Democrats to seize on during the confirmation process…

A man has come forward under the banner of "#MenToo," to say that in second grade, Amy Coney Barrett and her best friend at the time, cornered him at a birthday party at Chuck-E-Cheese and "injected him with a full dose of cooties." Which, if true, would obviously be disqualifying for serving on the highest court in the land.

Then there's a woman who says when she was nine-years-old, she lived on the same street as Amy Coney Barrett. She alleges that Coney-Barrett borrowed her VHS tape of Herbie Goes Bananas and did not return it for at least six months. And then when she did finally get the tape back, the woman says Coney Barrett did not even bother to rewind it. The FBI has interviewed at least two witnesses so far who say the tape was indeed not rewound and that it was very upsetting to the owner of the tape. Again, if true, this is troubling – clearly not the kind of integrity you want to see in a Supreme Court justice.

Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it.

The same neighbor also dropped a bombshell allegation about the drinking problem of Amy Coney Barrett and her closest friends. Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it. The neighbor says she "frequently" witnessed Coney-Barrett and her friends chugging entire cartons of milk – often Whole Milk, sometimes Chocolate Milk, occasionally both at the same time through a funnel.

Unfortunately, shooting-up cooties, injurious rewinding, and potential calcium-abuse are not even the worst of it.

A third person has now come forward, another man, and this is just reprehensible, it's hard to even fathom. But he alleges that in fourth grade, when they were around ten-years-old, Amy Coney Barrett and a group of "four or five of her friends" gang-GRAPED him on the playground during recess. He alleges the group of friends snuck uneaten grapes out of the cafeteria and gang-GRAPED him repeatedly in broad daylight. In other words, and I hate to have to spell this out because it's kind of graphic, but the group led by ten-year-old Amy Coney Barrett pelted this poor defenseless boy with whole grapes. He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

Obviously, even if just one of these allegations is half-true, no Senator with a conscience could possibly vote to confirm Coney Barrett. When there is a clear pattern of destructive childhood behavior, it always continues into adulthood. Because people do not change. Ever.

Fortunately, for the sake of the Republic, Democrats plan to subpoena Coney Barrett's childhood diary, to see what, if any, insights it may provide into her calcium habits, as well as her abuse of illicit cooties and the gang-GRAPING incident.

We will keep you posted on the latest, but for now, it looks like Democrats will find plenty in the reckless pre-teen life of Amy Coney Barrett to cast doubt on her nomination. And if not, they can always fall back on her deranged preference for letting babies be born.

[NOTE: The preceding was a parody written by MRA writer Nathan Nipper.]

On the radio program Friday, Glenn Beck discussed the recent news that a primary source for the Steele Dossier — the document on which much of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation was based — had been investigated by the FBI for contacts with suspected Russian spies. Glenn also shared several previously unpublished texts and emails from FBI agents have recently been released.

According to a letter sent by Attorney General William Barr to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday, the FBI knew early on that the research compiled by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele relied on a "Primary Sub-source" that had been "the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011 that assessed his or her contacts with suspected Russian intelligence officers" — but still used it to obtain warrants to spy on former Trump campaign-aide Carter Page.

But, it gets even worse. Now, new leaked texts and communications from FBI agents within the department at the time of the entire Russian collusion effort were disclosed in federal court filings on Thursday. According to the court documents, FBI agents purchased "professional liability insurance" to protect themselves in January 2017, just weeks before Donald Trump was inaugurated president, because they were concerned about the agency's potentially illegal activity during the Russia collusion investigation.

"Trump was right," one FBI employee wrote in response to then-President-elect Trump's Jan 3, 2017 tweet which read: "The 'Intelligence' briefing on so-called 'Russian hacking' was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Chief researcher Jason Buttrill joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to discuss an "explosive" new report released Wednesday by Senate Republicans on Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

Among other serious allegations, the 87-page report claims that "Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow," and the richest woman in Russia.

"The transactions discussed [in the report] are designed to illustrate the depth and extent of some questionable financial transactions. Moreover, the financial transactions illustrate serious counterintelligence and extortion concerns relating to Hunter Biden and his family," the report stated.

Jason suggested the Senate's findings provide additional evidence to back allegations of a money-laundering scheme, which Glenn detailed in a four-part series about Biden's shady connections to Ukraine. Learn more on this here.

"Laundered money is very hard to track to its finality," Jason explained. "I'm sure the Biden camp is really hoping that it just looks suspicious, but [investigators] don't ever find the eventual end point. But, if they do – and it's possible they already have – this is going to be explosive, very explosive."

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Revolutions rarely happen overnight. The Left started laying the groundwork for November 3, 2020, the moment Hillary Clinton had to concede the 2016 election to Donald Trump. It was always solely about getting rid of President Trump — and there's a playbook for that.

Last week, Glenn Beck showed you the "Seven Pillars of Color Revolution" written by a former U.S. diplomat, which are the conditions that must be in place for a successful Eastern European-style "Color Revolution." The left seems to be pushing for a Color Revolution this election because they are using the exact same playbook.

In part two of this series, Glenn peels back the layers on the first four of these Color Revolution pillars to show you how they work and what the end goal is. And he reveals one of the architects of the playbook – a Color Revolution specialist, former ambassador, and former Obama administration official who is one of the key masterminds of this revolution.

Joining Glenn is political campaign veteran and BlazeTV host Steve Deace who says the polls that claim Biden is leading the race "are trash." We're being set up to believe that if Trump wins in spite of the polls, it must be an invalid election.

Watch the full video below:


WATCH all of Glenn's Specials on BlazeTV:

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Save $10 with promo code GLENN.