Half Man, Half Machine

GLENN: And then there's the story that I want to get into that I found from the Associated Press. Hillary Clinton supporters and Democratic advisors, how does Hillary Clinton win? Oh, my gosh. Ooh. I can't believe these people are winning. Here are some of them: "Show passion." Show passion? She's crying all the time. We don't need her to show any more passion. We get it. She's either crying or she's screaming at us. It's the economy again. Here's actually a decent piece of advice. "Hillary Clinton must be on message that she is the candidate for the economy." And can I tell you something? Compared to Barack Obama -- I can't believe I'm saying this -- she is. I mean, I think we should actually start a campaign -- oh, no, that would work against. Kind of like the John McCain thing. With talk radio actually working now for John McCain by being against him, maybe we should all be for Barack Obama. I don't know. But Hillary Clinton is the one to run against and not because she would beat John McCain per se. I don't know. I don't know. I think she would -- I think she would lose to John McCain. I'm not really sure. I'm not going to predict how anybody votes anymore and I'm never going to count the Clinton machine out. These people are dirty, dirty, dirty. I just think she's the one, she's the one to run, not Barack Obama because it would be better to have her in the White House than Barack Obama, especially if everybody's crying every time he speaks.

Here's another piece of advice: "Go negative." Are you ridding me? Go negative? By the way, have you seen how negative this has gotten? Have you seen how divisive this has gotten? Have you seen the cries of racism now? Have you seen the guy that came and started yelling at -- in fact, it's happening a lot now -- yelling at Bill Clinton as he's on stage and just tearing him apart. And not only a conservative. An Obama supporter. And just tearing these people apart. Obama supporters are starting to get -- I mean, not Obama supporters, the normal ones. I mean, you know, the crazy ones, the ones that are crying. They are starting to come in and they're crashing Hillary Clinton's speeches and Bill Clinton's speeches and they're coming after them guns a blazing and they're saying, you know, look at the smear campaign, look at the hatred, look at what's going on, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Go negative? Can you have any -- do you have any concept of what is going to be said about conservatives and people who vote against Barack Obama? Can you imagine? Do you know how we're going to go down in the history books? In the history books if we vote against Barack Obama and he wins, we're going to be -- our children are going to be taught or our grandchildren are going to be taught that we were hate mongers, that we were -- that's all we were. They couldn't bring themselves to vote for a black man as President. Meanwhile the American people, they knew. They understood.

She needs to have a grassroots organization who wants to work for Hillary Clinton, seriously. I know people who used to work for her. They're like, oh, I can't take it. A grassroots organization? Who wants to volunteer their time for Hillary Clinton, especially since it seems like it's a machine. Tell me it doesn't feel like a machine to you. Here's a piece of advice: Just keep doing what you're doing. That's good. You know it's working real well for you so far. Yeah, just keep doing what you're doing.

And then my favorite piece of advice is: "Be yourself." Be yourself? I don't think she exists. I don't think these people even know who they are. Do you? I think Bill Clinton does. You know, he's kicking back having a beer or something? I think he remembers who he is. I don't think she even knows who she is anymore. I think she's so calculated, she's a machine.

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.