Michelle Obama: 'Prepare to earn less'




“We left corporate America, which is a lot of what we’re asking young people to do” - Michelle Obama

GLENN: Here's the thing. I could have a big old sloppy drink right now just reading the newspaper and, you know, while I watch someone from the wetlands commission tell me how to plant a frickin' carrot. And then I open up the newspaper and I read about Michelle Obama, how she's drawing the crowds. She gave another inspirational message of change and hope that I don't know if you heard in Zanesville, Ohio. You know, they could use some hope there in Ohio. You know, they're struggling. Average median household income 2004, $37,000. That's below Ohio and the national averages. 20% of the people there don't have a high school degree. What does she go, she goes and tells the people in Zanesville, Ohio, you know, the people who are living the this kind of life, the ones who have been living with low incomes the past few years, what message of change and hope does this woman bring? Quote: Don't go into corporate America. She said, we need people to go into the helping industry but if you do go into in direction, as we're encouraging young people to do, your salaries will respond. So she's telling struggling people, quit pursuing higher paying jobs and stay poor. She said, do what Barack and I did. We quit the money-making industry and went into public service. You have got to be kidding me. She goes on to claim the only reason they were able to escape the money trouble was because Barack wrote to best selling books. Really? Is that what it is? It wasn't the Princeton or Harvard education. It was that he wrote a couple of books. Really? She said it was like Jack and the Magic Beans. Once again, this is the prime example of a liberal who has made it and tossing their own success story aside as a fluke, sending the message loud and clear, you can't make it, I did but not because of a Princeton or Harvard education but because, you know, he wrote a book. Even if you do make it, she argues that the cost of college and education is so high that you'll be paying it off forever. Basically it's just not worth it. She says, I'm in my 40s and we're just paying off our student loans. You went to Harvard and Princeton. "We left corporate America and that's what we're asking you to do." Oh, good, good, leave corporate America, good. What she conveniently leaves out is, you know, is that she made up quite well in the helping industry as she likes to call it. She was the vice president of community affairs for a hospital in Chicago. She was making $121,900 in 2004. So that's a lot different than the $37,000 that, you know, people in Zanesville are making. About $121,900 in 2004. And then there was this weird coincidence. Her husband was elected senator of Illinois and her salary mysteriously jumped to $316,962 the very next year. That's weird how that happened, huh? That's crazy. But it's a good thing that she's helping and left corporate America. Community affairs industry, wow, that seems to be booming and quite lucrative, too. Not quite the sacrifice she might have left the audience with.

Oh, by the way, and the salary doesn't include corporate boards she still served on. So I'm just trying to figure this out. She wants us to leave corporate America, yet you can still serve on corporate boards. Now, you combine that with the salary of a United States senator and I would say that Obama's -- you know, I think they're doing pretty well for themselves. I don't think they're in need of Jack and his Magic Beans.

Now, let me ask you this question. Is this really the message of hope and change? Really? We made it but it was complete luck. You are going to be riddled with debt. So just do a job that helps people. Don't worry about the sacrifices you're going to have to make. How does she get away with telling a -- how does anyone stand in that building and not walk out? How does she tell a crowd of people who are making an average of $37,000 a year -- that's a household income -- to prepare themselves to serve the common -- for the common good and make even less money. You want a message of change? You want a message of hope? Here's one. How about telling people you can be whatever you want to be! How about telling people that if you do your best, you can make it. How about telling people you're going to do your best to make sure that the system is set up for them to pursue their dreams, whatever their dream may be, we're going to clear a path for ya. We're going to get all of -- we're going to let you plant carrots in your backyard if you want to! You want a message of hope and change? How about you're able to stop being ashamed of the fact that you were able to live the American dream. How about a message of hope that uses your own life as a blueprint for others to follow? We were disadvantaged. We had troubles. Barack's father wasn't in his life. He struggled because he wasn't a part of either race. He was white and he was black. He struggled and he made it and he's running for President of the United States. Never give up!" How about that message of hope and change. And let me ask you another question. What's wrong with being an executive? They are making it possible for millions of people to have jobs. What's wrong with being a lawyer? They often help people who are in need. Of course, they suck a lot of the times as well, but so does every profession. What's wrong with being a vice president of community affairs at a hospital making $391,000 a year? Nothing is wrong with that. What's wrong is telling Americans that they can't make it, that they have to settle for something other than what their hopes and dreams are, that they have to settle for something that they don't want to do. They have to do something that's good for the people.

Let me ask you this. What if Jon Huntsman, I told you about this guy. Guy who grew up literally in a house with cardboard walls, now one of the richest people in the world. What if Jon Huntsman never went into the corporate world? What if he never created the plastic fork and spoon? What if he never created, oh, those evil styrofoam containers for McDonald's. I'm sure the thousands of cancer patients at the Huntsman Cancer Institute wouldn't want to go back into history and change that career choice. I bet you there's nobody who is sick with cancer and currently being cure in his cancer institute would say, yeah, I wish he would have done something for the common good. He is doing something good for the common good! He's just used his wealth to get there, wealth that he created, wealth that was not handed to him on a plate. You know what, Michelle? I know you are not proud of this country. I know you are not proud of the opportunities that we have in this country but I am. I am. I've seen ordinary Americans give selflessly of themselves, whether they're doctors, they're lawyers, they're hedge fund managers, truckdrivers, wives of presidential candidates. What you don't understand, Michelle, is that we are already a helping nation. We just don't believe the bureaucrats in Washington know how to help. I believe my neighbors know how to help. I believe I know how to help. I believe Americans know how to help. We don't need to leave our evil corporate jobs to help. In fact, since you obviously don't know this, Michelle Obama, let me explain. We are the best in the world at helping others. Which country donated the most money, civilian donations, to tsunami victims? Which nation was it? What country had its citizens standing in line to give blood even though there was no use for blood on 9/11? What country has an endless amount of church groups and mission trips helping others all around the world for clean water? What country do you think has the longest list of thank you cards received from any other country from saving them from an evil dictator or genocidal maniac? What country has made the most military sacrifice in the name of helping others than anyone else in history? What country has freed more people than any other country in the history of mankind? What country has consistently been the brightest beacon of hope since it began back in 1776? Hope and change isn't something that's unique, Barack Obama and Michelle Obama. It's not unique. It's what this country was founded on. The United States of America and the citizens that make it up. It's nothing. The government is nothing without the citizens that make it up. We have been providing hope and change to the rest of the world for quite some time now and maybe you should shut the pie hole for a few minutes and read some history. Or maybe you should just take four years off and sit back and watch it as it happens. Perhaps you discover the same thing the rest of Americans already discovered, that despite our problems, despite our mistakes, despite all the things that we have done wrong in the past, we're the greatest country in the history of this planet. That's not jingoistic to say it. It's just the truth. If you did that, if you just took some time and read just history, just read the history prior to the Progressives taking over, read the founding fathers and their words. Read about the American Revolution. Read about the average person, the average person that walked without shoes, without any clothing, that were naked, that stayed in the winters. Read about those people. Maybe if you did that, you would stop saying stupid things like "Leave corporate America." Maybe you would understand that hope and change isn't coming from the government. It comes from within the individual, that the power is not in Washington. That's a lie. That's a lie that gives people like you and your husband power. It's a lie that gives people like John McCain power and Hillary Clinton power and George W. Bush power. Lies don't give power for long. Truth is the source of all ultimate power and the truth is God gives people rights, liberty and power and we lend them do people like you. If you're worthy, if we see that you're somebody that sees America in the same way we do, if you see America as a place where people can follow their own unique dream, they can follow it, they can follow it and they can serve other people or they can follow it and they can destroy themselves. That's what makes America great. That's why we're proud. That's why millions of people come here. That's why people crawl here. That's why people make rafts to float here. That's why people give up their life in pursuit of coming here because it is the land of opportunity, not the land of perfect government, not the land that never made any mistakes but the land of opportunity, to pull yourself up by the bootstraps, sitting in your multimillion dollar mansion, you of all people should realize that. But you don't and sadly you probably never will.

The Biden Admin EXPANDED abortion access because they DON'T believe in the Constitution

Joshua Lott / Stringer, JOSEPH PREZIOSO / Contributor | Getty Images

This month has already produced an extreme example of why we need a functional and more conservative Congress in order for America to have a chance at moving forward—because the Left does not believe in the Constitution.

Sure, if you confronted a Democrat in Congress, they would probably claim some sort of allegiance to the Constitution—but as a practical matter, they do not believe in it.

Instead, the Left has put all of their eggs in the basket of the executive branch. Why? Because it has the furthest reach through all the various departments, and it can move the fastest—in short, because it’s the most dictatorial. It only takes a department head to write a new memo, or even better, the President to sign a new executive order to carry the force of law.

The Left has put all of their eggs in the basket of the executive branch.

Do you recall any of the Left’s favorite Supreme Court decisions over the years—something like gay marriage for example—and how Republicans immediately tried to subvert it, using the executive branch to try to nullify the decision? Yeah, that never happened. But that is exactly what Democrats have done in recent weeks to expand abortion access.

Democrats only consider the Supreme Court legitimate when they approve of the decisions. When the miraculous overturning of Roe v. Wade happened last summer, President Biden called it “a realization of an extreme ideology and a tragic error by the Supreme Court.”

Democrats only consider the Supreme Court legitimate when they approve of the decisions.

Recently the FDA approved local pharmacies to issue abortion pills. For the first 20 years after these pills were developed, they were not treated like typical prescription drugs. They had to be dispensed in-person by a doctor. That in-person requirement is now gone.

Keep in mind that the Left’s go-to line is that abortion is always about the health and safety of women, yet a 2021 peer-reviewed study found that chemical abortions have a complication rate four times greater than surgical abortions. Between 2002 and 2015, the rate of abortion-related ER visits following use of the abortion pills increased by 507 percent.

Chemical abortions have a complication rate four times greater than surgical abortions.

And now the Biden administration is making these less-safe abortions much more accessible. Thanks to the FDA’s rule change, Walgreens and CVS have already agreed to dispense abortion pills in states where abortion is legal—effectively turning these stores into new abortion clinics.

As for states that have abortion bans, "Team Biden" announced a new way around those too. Three weeks ago, the Justice Department issued a legal opinion that the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to deliver abortion pills anywhere, even in places where abortion is illegal. What’s their rationale? That the sender cannot know for sure whether the recipient will use the pills illegally or not. So it’s totally okay.

The U.S. Postal Service is allowed to deliver abortion pills anywhere, even in places where abortion is illegal.

Georgetown Law professor Lawrence Gostin told the Washington Post that this Justice Department opinion is “a major expansion of abortion access in the United States.”

So, to recap—the Biden administration has used the FDA, the Justice Department, and the Post Office, which all fall under the executive branch, to provide an end-run around the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson decision.

Expanding abortion was easy—simple policy tweaks and declarations that carry the force of law without an ounce of input from actual lawmakers in Congress—all because it comes from the grotesque, bloated, apparently pro-death executive branch.

Glenn is one of the most outspoken critics of the World Economic Forum and their vision to use crises to reconstruct the world order known as The Great Reset. The recent WEF summit in Davos confirms what Glenn has long warned about: globalist elites seek to upend our democracy, freedoms, and way of life to achieve their utopian climate goals. Here are 15 quotes from the 2023 Davos Summit, revealing their true intentions in their own words:

1. Saving the planet

When you hear the word, "Davos," the first thought that should pop into your mind is an elite group getting together to save the world from imminent climate disaster... at least they think of themselves that way. According to John Kerry:

I mean, it's so almost extraterrestrial to think about saving the planet.

2. Private jets

What most people think when they hear the word "Davos" is a group of global elites flying in on private jets to talk about climate change... and yes, John Kerry does own a private jet, no matter how many times he denies it:

I fly commercial [...] Exclusively.

3. Global Collaboration Village

You always hear some weird, dystopian projects coming out of WEF, like "The Global Collaboration Village," a new metaverse community aimed at strengthening "global cooperation." It sounds like the next installment of Brave New World. According to Klaus Schwab, Founder and President of the WEF:

The Global Collaboration Village is the pioneering effort to use the metaverse for public good, to create global cooperation and to strengthen global cooperation in the metaverse or using metaverse technologies. For me, it's a dream coming true because the village allows the Forum to create a more larger and open platform where everybody can participate.

4. Climate revolution

However, the core theme throughout WEF summits is the immediate need for a climate revolution and how businesses are selfishly blocking the revolution because they want to make an extra buck. Here's how John Kerry summed up the sentiment:

How do we get there? The lesson I have learned in the last years [...] is money, money, money, money, money, money, money.

5. Do or die

This often turns into alarmist language, like having to choose between wealth and our planet's survival... Joyeeta Gupta, Professor of Environment and Development in the Global South at University of Amsterdam, said it eloquently:

If we do the minimum at this pivotable moment in our history, then we and our children – even if we are rich – will live in the danger zone. But if we – business people, governments, citizens, cities – take action today, then we and our children will have a future worth looking forward to.

6. Colossal risks

Potsdam Institute's director Johan Rockström, used similar language, claiming we are "taking colossal risks with the future of civilization":

We are taking colossal risks with the future of civilization on Earth, we are degrading the life support systems that we all depend on, we are actually pushing the entire Earth system to a point of destabilization, pushing Earth outside of the state that has supported civilization since we left the last Ice Age 10,000 years ago.

7. Rain bombs

"Colossal risks" like... rain bombs? We didn't make that up. Ask Al Gore:

That’s what’s boiling the oceans, creating these atmospheric rivers, and the rain bombs.

Courtesy of the World Economic Forum

8. Survival comes down to this

How do we secure our survival? According to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, we have to "end our addiction to fossil fuels." This entails wiping out our entire energy industry, displacing millions of workers, and relying on global governments to usher in a new green industry. In his words:

So, we need to act together to close the emissions gap, and that means to phase out progressively coal and supercharge the renewable revolution, to end the addiction to fossil fuels, and to stop our self-defeating war on nature.

9. Complete transformation

It isn't hyperbolic to argue that the globalist climate goals will completely transform the world economy. Even EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen admitted:

The net-zero transformation is already causing huge industrial, economic and geopolitical shifts – by far the quickest and the most pronounced in our lifetime. It is changing the nature of work and the shape of our industry.

10. Scientific necessity

Of course, to bring about this "net-zero" transformation, we will have to override small, "political expediencies" like democracy to do what is "scientifically necessary." According to Zurich Insurance Group’s head of sustainability risk John Scott:

We’re living in a world right now where what’s scientifically necessary, and what is politically expedient don’t match.

11. Illegal hate speech

Doing away with "political expediencies" would also require the censorship of dissent, which would likely manifest in hate-speech laws. When asked by Brian Stelter how the discussion of disinformation relates to everything else happening today in Davos, European Commission VP Věra Jourová shared this prediction:

Illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the U.S. I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law.

12. Climate first

We will also have to forego national interests on the international stage. America won't be able to advocate for policies and interests that benefit Americans. Instead, we will sacrifice national interests for the sake of global climate interests. French economy minister Bruno Le Maire said:

The key question is not China First, US First, Europe First. The key question for all of us is Climate First.

13. The role of war

We can also expect globalist leaders to use crises, like the war in Ukraine, to expedite the "net-zero transformation." Chancellor of Germany Olaf Scholz said:

Ultimately, our goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 has been given an additional boost by Putin’s war. Now we have even more cause to move away from fossil fuels.

14. Blame game

Globalist leaders will continue to blame ALL of the crises in our society on climate change to justify the "net-zero transition," from the energy shortage to "mistrust, selfishness [and] xenophobia." Prime Minister of Spain Pedro Sanchez said:

Our present struggle is not only against Putin or the energy shortage. It is also against fear, mistrust, selfishness, xenophobia, and environmental disaster. And its outcome will define life in the West and beyond for decades to come.

15. Sacrifice for the greater good

While we sacrifice our national interests for the sake of the "greater global good," we can expect our foreign enemies, like China, to benefit. Suisse Chairman Axel Lehmann said:

The growth forecasts now for China is 4.5%. I would not personally be surprised when that would be topped.

Conclusion

Glenn has been clear about the distinction between wanting to transition to green practices on your own accord and being forced into that transition by globalist, unelected elites. Leaders at Davos will continue to use alarmist language to justify their crackdown on democracy and freedom to bring about their leftist utopia. We have to cut through the alarmist language and in order to protect our freedoms.

Glenn has focused on exposing the dark side of the gender movements waging our culture war, and now, there's a new "trend" emerging as an offshoot to the transgender movement. A growing online community, particularly of men, who consider themselves "involuntarily celibate" or "incels" believe they can live a better life as a trans woman. Why? This community purports the world is rigged against men, particularly against traditionally "unattractive men." What's the solution? Stop being a man...

Incel or "involutarily celibate" communities have existed online in the dark corners of Reddit and Discord for years. The groups are marked by a hatred towards women, blaming them for rigging the world in their favor and denying them of sex. Several members of this growing community have been responsible for large acts of violence, most notably Alek Minassian, who killed 10 and injured 16 after driving a van into a busy area of Toronto in 2021.

However, the transgender movement has presented a new option for incel members: if you can't beat 'em, join 'em... or, in the Transmaxxers' case, "become them."

The online Transmaxxer's Manifesto says, “Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.” According to the manifesto, transitioning to female not only opens up a different pool of sexual partners, but moreover, you gain access to female-only spaces and are “able to extract resources from males.”

“Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.”

Another member wrote, "If you do not currently feel like living as a female you might have to work on fixing that ... Identifying as male or being emotionally attached to a male body is bad for you if being male results in you living a bad life.”

This new movement is significant because it is in stark contrast to the mainstream narrative that "transgenderism" is an innate quality. Now, it can be an "option" people choose for social advantage. A moderator going by the alias “Vintologi” on the Transmaxxing Discord server, which boasts over 1,200 members, told The Daily Caller:

Transmaxxing is about transitioning for personal gain rather than focusing on things like "gender identity." ... What matters when it comes to medical transition is whether or not said transition would actually be beneficial, thus the extent to which gender identity is innate does not inform us much regarding when medical transition is appropriate.

One incel member on Reddit lamented that he can't Transmaxx to "have sex with white trans women" and to have "all the benefits of [being] female."

Transmaxxing sheds light on a concerning issue as an increasing number of people, particularly the youth, identify as "transgender." What used to be considered as a "finge case" is now being seen as a social advantage. Glenn recently sat down with de-transitioner Chloe Cole, and the amount of pressure she experienced to become a transgender man AS A TEENAGER was ASTOUNDING. She discussed the new community, friendships, and affirmation she gained when she started her transition journey, and she lost ALL of those social perks when she began de-transitioning. She exchanged affirmation for death-threats, friendships for stone-cold silence.

Transmaxxing is a very specific example of a larger movement that is deeply concerning. Not only is the thansgender ideology problematic on its own merits, but now, we are seeing a rise of a distinction of "social advantage" based on gender affiliation. This is deviating away from the original notion that transgenderism is an innate quality. Now, many consider it more "socially advantageous" to identify as transgender than with your biological gender.

At the same time President Biden's misplaced classified documents were sitting in his house, garage, and office at the Penn Biden Center, a whole lot of Chinese money was flowing around him. Is this just a coincidence, or did the Chinese get anything in return? Investigative journalist John Solomon joins to break down what was going on here ...

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.