Glenn Beck: Stu's trial


The Stu Show airs Friday at noon ET exclusively on the Glenn Beck Insider. Signup today!

GLENN: I don't know if we're ready today.

STU: I understand. You said that I have something here and I want to --

GLENN: Are we ready, Joe? Are we ready?

STU: You don't need to be ready.

GLENN: Yeah, we do.

STU: No, you don't. I'm filing.

GLENN: You are filing what?

STU: A motion to dismiss. I'm filing a motion to dismiss.

GLENN: The swinger trial, are we ready for the swinger trial, Joe?

STU: I have a motion to dismiss.

GLENN: Are we ready on the prosecution side?

JOE: (Inaudible). -- forward at this last minute with this motion to dismiss.

STU: Last minute? When was I supposed to come out with it?

JOE: I know Stu doesn't like to follow the norms of society. He just can't take the approach this is some --

STU: What is this anyway? Why is Joe Kerry here?

GLENN: Joe is an attorney.

STU: You have an attorney?

GLENN: Of course. This is a trial. I'm the judge.

STU: How can you be the judge? You are the accuser.

GLENN: No, I'm not. The accuser has yet to be named. Oh, we've got witnesses, don't we, Joe?

JOE: We have lots of witnesses.

GLENN: We even have a star witness, uh-huh.

STU: Well, he, she, whoever it is.

GLENN: Has one -- is one still threatening to plead the Fifth?

JOE: Yes, that witness is. But we're still working with that particular witness.

STU: It's not going to matter what your witnesses think. We're going to dismiss this case today.

GLENN: Really? Okay. Go ahead.

STU: Motion to dismiss.

GLENN: Go ahead. Present your motion.

STU: Well, I mean, I'm allowed to actually have my voice because I'm doubting. I was doubting whether you were going to --

GLENN: This is fair. Joe, is this fair?

JOE: If you want fair, you would be denying the motion. You wouldn't even begin Stu the opportunity to talk.

GLENN: No, go ahead. We want to be fair. We want to prove that you are a swinger and we will do that in a fair way.

STU: Can we pull that audio?

GLENN: We will do that in a fair way, will we not?

STU: Well, the basis of this argument is simple. Mr. Beck has been trying to paint me as a swinger, which is obviously ridiculous, and it's -- the truth is you are simply an elitist that doesn't understand what it's like to have a salary with only one comma in it. And you -- what you have, of course, not even taken into account, and you didn't ask about was the fact that the hotel that I was staying in is one of the most expensive in New Jersey. Yes, I did share it with someone but that's a legitimate financial decision.

GLENN: Stu.

STU: To make it --

GLENN: Stu, question from the bench.

STU: Am I going to get interrupted every time?

GLENN: On this one. Most of the most expensive in New Jersey?

STU: Yes.

GLENN: Could I, Glenn Beck, hit a neighborhood of blight with a baseball from this hotel? If I were on the roof with a baseball, could I throw it --

STU: Objection, relevancy. What does that have to do? We know the price. You are arguing it should be lower? It doesn't matter if it should be lower. It isn't lower.

GLENN: I'm just saying it's all relative. The most expensive in New Jersey.

STU: New Jersey's one of the most expensive states in the union.

GLENN: It's the most expensive in New Jersey.

STU: I'm glad to see the facts are out the window since New Jersey is one of the most expensive states in the union.

GLENN: I already made my ruling. I already made my ruling.

STU: I was also not -- which is not at all accounted for is there was a required two-night minimum for this week even. So Mr. Beck would have the jury believe that I should not only have wasted hundreds of dollars of a hotel room that I would only sleep in for five hours.

GLENN: Why are you only paying for a hotel room by the hour now?

STU: That's not what I was saying.

GLENN: You were staying for five hours --

[ OVERLAPPING SPEAKERS ]

GLENN: Excuse me. You are out of order. Are you trying to convince this court that you just said that you were only going to stay there for five hours.

STU: No, I didn't say that. I have a transcript right here. The hotel room that I would be sleeping in for five hours.

GLENN: Okay. So you want -- would you like to rent it if you could rent it for five hours or six hours? If they were offering you --

STU: Objection, relevancy.

GLENN: If they were offering you an hourly -- overruled.

STU: How are you overrule? You are the one arguing.

GLENN: I'm the judge. If they could offer you an hourly rate, you're telling me you wouldn't have taken it?

STU: Yes, I would not have taken that. Not interested in an hourly rate.

GLENN: He is lying. It will not be --

STU: Oh, thank you, jury. The judge has said I'm lying. So well said. I'm just letting them know.

GLENN: This is a motion just to hear your --

STU: I want it on the court record.

DAN: Your Honor, may I approach the bench?

STU: No, not in the middle of my motion.

DAN: I have a question, your Honor. I would like to know why the defendant here had to stay at this hotel. There are lots of other hotels in this area that are a lot --


[ OVERLAPPING SPEAKERS ]

GLENN: There's a crackhouse across the street.

STU: Oh, so I should have walked through the crackhouse to get to the hotel. That's perfect.

GLENN: You should have stayed at the crackhouse if you were that poor.

JOE: Your Honor, I did some preliminary research for this and --

STU: Why am I being interrupted?

GLENN: Excuse me.

JOE: It turns out that not only did Mr. Burguiere choose the most expensive hotel to stay.

STU: As I said, part of my defense.

JOE: But there are over 75 other hotels and motels in Atlantic City, many of which are right in the neighborhood Stu decided to stay.

STU: Really?

JOE: Absolutely.

STU: What do you mean by the same neighborhood? The same state, the same city? Because as we just discussed there is blight apparently too close to Glenn for this hotel.

GLENN: If he will shut his pie hole. Go ahead.

STU: Based on the assumption that because myself and my wife shared a hotel room, we must have shared sex together. This basis of the theory, of course, is based on the fact that Mr. Beck has no self-control. On national radio he has repeatedly admitted that he would not hire a hot nanny because he feared he might not be able to control himself. It's also a good thing that he doesn't risk that because on national television he's asked several attractive females for nude pictures of themselves and has repeatedly sexually propositioned respected news person and married mother of a small child Erica Hill according to many respected news outlets or liberal blogs. So this behavior has grown to be expected for Beck --

GLENN: Excuse me, excuse me. Next point. I'm going to -- this will not be allowed to be entered in evidence as, "Have you seen the hot nanny"? I mean really?

STU: This is exactly what I'm talking about.

GLENN: See what I'm saying? And the other part of it is you're quoting moveon.org. Move on.

STU: I don't know what you're talking about. Okay. Well, if sharing living quarters is a crime, we should point out that Glenn Beck himself actually lived with the other accuser in this scenario, Dan Andros, for several months. In fact, they liked living in the same house so much, Andros then later moved into Beck's house up in Pennsylvania. In fact, the gall of Dan Andros to accuse Mr. Burguiere of anything shady for sharing a room is laughable. Records show Andros shared a room with another unidentified man for over a decade -- let me say this.

GLENN: Mr. Burguiere, Mr. Burguiere.

STU: In fact, the same bed --


[ OVERLAPPING SPEAKERS ]

GLENN: Mr. Burguiere.

STU: No, not the gavel.

GLENN: I will not ask you again.

STU: All right. Well, let me just --

GLENN: No. I will not ask you again. How many square feet was the hotel room that you were in?

STU: I do not have a blueprint of the --

GLENN: How many square feet approximately was the room that you, your wife, and the third swinger were in?

STU: It was much bigger than one bed which is what Dan Andros shared not only once but repeatedly, a repeated --

GLENN: Mr. Burguiere.

STU: Slander. The same bed --

GLENN: Mr. Burguiere.

STU: Notice a bunk bed in his circles.

GLENN: Your motion has been denied.

STU: I have more.

GLENN: It's too bad. You blew your chance. Motion --

STU: You were interrupting the entire time.

GLENN: Motion denied. Tomorrow, the trial of the century. Stu, Steve Burguiere, swinger... or swinger.

On the radio program Friday, Glenn Beck discussed the recent news that a primary source for the Steele Dossier — the document on which much of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation was based — had been investigated by the FBI for contacts with suspected Russian spies. Glenn also shared several previously unpublished texts and emails from FBI agents have recently been released.

According to a letter sent by Attorney General William Barr to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday, the FBI knew early on that the research compiled by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele relied on a "Primary Sub-source" that had been "the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011 that assessed his or her contacts with suspected Russian intelligence officers" — but still used it to obtain warrants to spy on former Trump campaign-aide Carter Page.

But, it gets even worse. Now, new leaked texts and communications from FBI agents within the department at the time of the entire Russian collusion effort were disclosed in federal court filings on Thursday. According to the court documents, FBI agents purchased "professional liability insurance" to protect themselves in January 2017, just weeks before Donald Trump was inaugurated president, because they were concerned about the agency's potentially illegal activity during the Russia collusion investigation.

"Trump was right," one FBI employee wrote in response to then-President-elect Trump's Jan 3, 2017 tweet which read: "The 'Intelligence' briefing on so-called 'Russian hacking' was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Chief researcher Jason Buttrill joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to discuss an "explosive" new report released Wednesday by Senate Republicans on Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

Among other serious allegations, the 87-page report claims that "Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow," and the richest woman in Russia.

"The transactions discussed [in the report] are designed to illustrate the depth and extent of some questionable financial transactions. Moreover, the financial transactions illustrate serious counterintelligence and extortion concerns relating to Hunter Biden and his family," the report stated.

Jason suggested the Senate's findings provide additional evidence to back allegations of a money-laundering scheme, which Glenn detailed in a four-part series about Biden's shady connections to Ukraine. Learn more on this here.

"Laundered money is very hard to track to its finality," Jason explained. "I'm sure the Biden camp is really hoping that it just looks suspicious, but [investigators] don't ever find the eventual end point. But, if they do – and it's possible they already have – this is going to be explosive, very explosive."

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Revolutions rarely happen overnight. The Left started laying the groundwork for November 3, 2020, the moment Hillary Clinton had to concede the 2016 election to Donald Trump. It was always solely about getting rid of President Trump — and there's a playbook for that.

Last week, Glenn Beck showed you the "Seven Pillars of Color Revolution" written by a former U.S. diplomat, which are the conditions that must be in place for a successful Eastern European-style "Color Revolution." The left seems to be pushing for a Color Revolution this election because they are using the exact same playbook.

In part two of this series, Glenn peels back the layers on the first four of these Color Revolution pillars to show you how they work and what the end goal is. And he reveals one of the architects of the playbook – a Color Revolution specialist, former ambassador, and former Obama administration official who is one of the key masterminds of this revolution.

Joining Glenn is political campaign veteran and BlazeTV host Steve Deace who says the polls that claim Biden is leading the race "are trash." We're being set up to believe that if Trump wins in spite of the polls, it must be an invalid election.

Watch the full video below:


WATCH all of Glenn's Specials on BlazeTV:

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Save $10 with promo code GLENN.

Sen. Ted Cruz: NOBODY should be afraid of Trump's Supreme Court justice pick

Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Wednesday to weigh in on President Donald Trump's potential Supreme Court nominees and talk about his timely new book, "One Vote Away: How a Single Supreme Court Seat Can Change History."

Sen. Cruz argued that, while Congressional Democrats are outraged over President Trump's chance at a third court appointment, no one on either side should be afraid of a Supreme Court justice being appointed if it's done according to the founding documents. That's why it's crucial that the GOP fills the vacant seat with a true constitutionalist.

Watch the video below to hear the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.