Glenn Beck: McCain on Letterman

GLENN: All right. So let's talk a little bit about John McCain and tell you about a very unscientific poll that we take here on the program. We send it out how often, Dan?

DAN: We've been doing it once a month since Super Tuesday. That will be the third installment.

STU: I will argue that this is not scientific. There is no scientist that would back this up, okay?

GLENN: Oh, no, it's just as valid as any other poll.

STU: Yeah, because this is -- when you look at -- people say web poll, that makes no sense. But this is -- we're not asking for -- this is not the nation's opinion. This is our audience's opinion and, you know, you can certainly say it came out in the newsletter. It's not one you can go on necessarily and go spam.

GLENN: This is what I would guess. These numbers are exactly what I would guess would happen in this poll.

STU: Yeah. And it's happening about the same pace.

DAN: We're talking tens of thousands of people are taking these polls. So these are solid numbers.

GLENN: Okay. So the poll is John McCain. You're a happy McCain supporter. The next one is, I want to teach the GOP a lesson, I'll vote Hillary or Obama. Another one is, I don't like McCain but I'll vote for him anyway. And the other one is vote for third party or won't vote at all. When we first took this poll right at Super Tuesday and John McCain won, "Will vote third party or not vote at all," was at 50% of the respondents. That has now fallen to what? I don't have the exact number here.

DAN: 15.84%.

GLENN: Jeez. The lowest was happy McCain supporter at what percentage?

DAN: When we first did it, it was 5.2%.

GLENN: And it's now?

DAN: It is now at 22%.

GLENN: The next lowest was "Teach GOP a lesson, vote Hillary or Obama" was at?

 

DAN: 12.4%.

GLENN: And it's now?

DAN: 3.2%.

GLENN: And then don't like McCain but vote for him anyway was now at

DAN: 33%

GLENN: Now at?

DAN: 58%.

STU: As you get further away from the primary where you thought you had better choices, you start embracing McCain.

GLENN: Right.

STU: And it winds up being that he's -- you know, it's the same exact thing you are going to see in the Democratic side.

GLENN: Oh, yeah, it's driving me crazy to hear people say, oh, well, if my candidate doesn't win, I'm going to vote for John McCain. No, you won't. No, you won't. Just like, you know, people didn't move to Canada when Bush won. I'm not really going to move to Bermuda.

STU: Bahamas.

GLENN: Bahamas. I meant if anybody wins.

DAN: You are not?

GLENN: You guys are still -- here's the thing on the move to the Bahamas, guys. I'm all with you, but we have to be self-sufficient. So solar power is good. But what are we going to -- what are we going to eat? Just grow sugar cane?

DAN: Fish.

STU: I think you are misunderstanding here. You are moving to get away from society. You want to go to this place where nothing can touch you. I plan on moving to --

GLENN: John Galt comes to mind.

STU: Understood.

DAN: I'm still going to grocery shop.

STU: I plan on living at a resort. Yes, I plan on living at a Sandals.

GLENN: I'm not building a Sandals. If I'm living on the island, I'm not building a Sandals.

STU: I'll live on the next island and I'll commute by rowboat.

GLENN: There will be razor wire in the water. Believe me, guys, it's all going to be fun and games to you until one day I just disappear.

STU: I do not at all doubt that. And actually I think it would be interesting programming that day.

GLENN: It really would be.

STU: It really would.

GLENN: "We have no idea where Glenn is." How long do you think it takes, how long do I have to be gone before you guys all realize, I don't think he went to go get some M&Ms, I think he's gone.

STU: This is like the Atlantic City mayor. Remember he just disappeared for, like, a month and no one did anything? And then all of a sudden we're like, maybe we should get a new mayor? The time line's a little bit loose there but I remember it was a long time, way too long to just not have a mayor showing up every day and he just disappeared. I feel like with you, we would give you a couple of days. Then we would --

GLENN: Couple of days?

DAN: Yeah, if my e-mail box was empty and I didn't have like a 2:00 a.m. e-mail from Glenn.

STU: Which we got last night, by the way.

DAN: Which we got last night. If I didn't get one of those for maybe 48 hours.

GLENN: Then you would be, oh, boy, he's dead or not coming back.

STU: Get Pat Gray on the phone.

DAN: Or he's drunk, one or the other.

GLENN: No, I would still be writing you going, guys, you guys were right, Jack Daniels is -- I can do this show starting at 8:00 this morning. What do you say?

STU: This economy's fantastic!

GLENN: I got so much money, I just blew it all on Jack Daniels. Jack Daniels, screw gold. Currency of the future is booze!

And I believe in a sober condition that that may be accurate because if things really go in the crap can, we're all going to want to be hammered out of our mind. So growth industry, booze.

Next, John McCain. John McCain on David Letterman last night. For those of you who say, yeah, I'm not really a John McCain supporter but, ooh, what else am I going to do, I just want to play a little of John McCain for you on David Letterman. Here it is.

McCAIN: We are paying a heavy price for four years of mishandling of this war by Rumsfeld and others and --

GLENN: "Others."

LETTERMAN: Due to our position in the world. People have just now have greater and greater reason to resent us. We're supposed to be the leader and everything in the world but apparently not in this case in terms of humanity, for God sakes.

GLENN: Stop. Stop, stop. We're not the leader as far as humanity for God sakes. If you are the President of the United States, you want to be President of the United States, you want my vote, how do you answer that? "We are the leader of the free world. We do stand for human rights. You are totally wrong on that one." Have you been watching Keith Olbermann? You probably should stop doing that. We are the leader. We are the best hope for mankind. We still are. Name the country that's better than us, Dave. You can't.

Now, with that being said, have we made mistakes? Yes, and here are the ones I would like to correct. That's how you'd like to answer it. John McCain doesn't. John McCain accepts that premise that everybody hates us and we're no longer the leader as far as humanity, for God sakes.

McCAIN: I think it opposes a greater threat to the state of Israel because the Iranians are stronger rather than weaker since this happened. I think that if we set this withdrawal as you just mentioned a date forth, we would have chaos in the region. But we also need to do some other things.

GLENN: Listen to this.

McCAIN: I think we need to work together on global, on a global agreement on climate change. I think we've got --

GLENN: Stop. You've got to be kidding me. You go from the war -- you accept his premise, then you go from the war and you touch on that and then right to global climate change? By the way, Dan, just a preview for tomorrow's program. Could you please just play a little of Ted Turner? This is Ted Turner on Charlie Rose about global climate change. Listen to this.

TURNER: Doing it will be catastrophic. We'll have 8 degrees, we'll be 8 degrees hotter in 10 -- not 10 but in 30 to 40 years and basically none of the crops will grow. Most of the people, the rest of us will be cannibals. Civilization will be broken down. The few people left will be living in a failed state like Somalia or Sudan.

GLENN: Stop just a second. Who's off their medication? Wow. At first I thought he was crazy when he said it would be 8 degrees warmer in ten years but then he clarified and said it's 30 or 40 years. And I went, oh, because the first statement was crazy because there's nothing to back that one up, Ted. Oh, but 30 or 40 years, 8 degrees? Stu?

STU: Yes.

GLENN: 30 or 40 years, 8 degrees, where is he pulling that one?

STU: Well, there's no projection that in 30 years is over 1 degree.

GLENN: No, it's 8 degrees.

STU: That is Celsius.

GLENN: Flat Earther. Here's -- flat Earther, shut up.

STU: What if he were --

GLENN: Shut up. The Holocaust happened and I won't hear your lies anymore.

The other thing that he says is that we're all going to be -- most people will be dead and then we'll be -- those who are left -- those who will be left will be cannibals. Stu, where is he finding the "We all turn into cannibals?"

STU: That one's not showing up on the chart.

GLENN: Stu, stop denying the Holocaust. I don't know why you hate Jews so much.

STU: I'm just saying --

GLENN: I don't know why you insist that the planet is flat. Any dummy will show you evidence that it's round.

STU: I didn't say that. I'll saying that there's no cannibalism.

GLENN: Oh, let's all just, you know, call the television set an evil magic box.

STU: (Laughing).

GLENN: What is wrong with you? We're all going to be cannibals and it's going to be 8 degrees warmer in 40 years. Now, that's, that's the most conservative estimate. It could be 30 years that we're all cannibals.

STU: Again I don't see that on this chart at all. I have all of the records --

GLENN: Okay. All right, all right, I cannot take your hate mongering. I cannot take -- and I wasn't going to play this card, Stu. Do you have any money in a retirement fund?

STU: Well, yes, I have --

GLENN: How much money have you invested in ExxonMobil?

STU: None that I know of. Maybe --

GLENN: None that you "Know of."

STU: Maybe it's in the mutual --

GLENN: Oh, now we find out it may be in one of the mutual funds.

STU: It's possible.

GLENN: It's possible. I'm sorry, Stu. We're going to have to dismiss you now from any kind of conversation on global warming. Not only are you denying all the facts on global warming but also you're clearly in bed with big oil.


 

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.