Glenn Beck: Free Food!


Food Stamps - they're not just for poor people anymore!

GLENN: I've got to tell you, man, I mean, what's happening here in our own country being orchestrated by these progressives that have wanted to do away with real capitalism forever, that just believe, okay, sure. Communism, socialism fails but not if everybody does it. We can all fail together. They've been trying and they're coming at it from six different ways. You think that you have welfare reform, but the Republican Congress eased the restrictions when they say that, you know, we have the highest food stamps usage ever, I told you, this is bull crap. First of all, they were advertising for them. Second of all, the population has grown, and they have also relieved a lot of the requirements. You don't have to be you don't have to jump through all of the hoops that you had to and they've taken some of the shame out of food stamps. They've taken the shame out of food stamps by giving you a debit card. It looks just like a regular debit card.

Now, a lot of people will say, oh, my gosh, Glenn. You want to shame people that want food stamps? Yeah. I would like to make the free cheese a little painful, yeah. I would like you to have a little embarrassment on the food stamps, the free food. Yeah, I would. I would. I mean, I could just I could come over to your house and serve it to you, but I want people to want to get off of food stamps. I want people to want to get off the government programs. I want people to go, wait a minute. This great state thing, that doesn't really work for me. That's what I would like to happen. Instead, we're going in the opposite direction. You know, let me ask you a question. With your kids, do you do everything with your kids or for your kids or do you at some point let them fail? My son wanted to feed himself, absolutely wanted to feed himself. No, no, no, no. Me do it. Me do it. And he would try to grab the fork before he could even do it. All right. We'll let him. And then when he couldn't do it and he, like, put the fork in his face a few times, then we would help him. And then he once he got, you know, good at doing it, you know, he ate on his own the whole time, until Cheyenne was born and it's weird because I watched this pattern with the other two kids. When Cheyenne was born, then he all of the sudden saw us feeding her and he wanted to be a baby again. Feed me. Feed me. No. You can do it. I can't. Yes, you can. And I didn't feed him. He had to feed himself. He knew how to do it. I wasn't going to treat him like a baby.

I was with a guy this weekend. He's an amazing guy, I just love him. And he has cerebral palsy and we were spending some time on Saturday and he had to tie something and I watched him and I was sitting beside him or right behind him and I saw him there and he had to tie something and he couldn't do it and he started to tie it the second time and it was very difficult and I leaned forward and I was going to say, here, let me help you with that. And then I didn't. And the reason why I didn't is because he can do it and he didn't ask for my help and I wasn't going to say, can I tie that for you, because he doesn't need high help and he also knew he was strong enough to say, will you help me, without any embarrassment. He needs help. Fine. But I wasn't going to lean in and do it and say, can I do that for you because he can do it himself and he wants to do it himself. He takes pride in what he can do himself, he takes pride in who he is. That's why I admire him. Nothing ever stops him. He just does it. If he asks for help, I would be there, but he's the kind of guy that if he really needed the help, he would know that it was there but it would take him a long time to ask for that help, not out of stupid stubbornness. He's not going to put himself in danger, but because he wants to stand on his own 2 feet. That's the attitude that we should have. You want to do it yourself. Now, if somebody asks me for help, I'm going to help them, but if in the course of helping them I realize, wait a minute. They can do it themselves. They're just getting me to do it. That's the last time I help them. I've got better things to do. I've got people who actually need help. My own kids, I'll help them and as soon as, like my son, he says, feed me, help me, and he doesn't need it, I'm going to teach him for his own good, I'm not helping you. You can do it, for his own good. I don't hate my son. I love him and for his own good I'm not going to help him when he doesn't need help. He may want it. He may beg for it, but if he can do it himself or if he needs to struggle to learn how to do it himself, I won't help him and it kills me inside. I mean, how many times have you held your kids and said, oh, just don't grow up. My two kids right now, they're I've got the two teenagers and the two young ones and I hold little ones and I'm, please, don't grow up, don't grow up. I love my teenagers to death, but I wish they wouldn't have grown up. It's fun. It's a whole different thing, but it's just not the same and it's better in some regards. In others, when you're holding those little ones and they need you, it's fantastic and they look at you differently and it's great. But if they were like that all the time, you would be, like, okay. Come on. Are my teenagers are like that? No. Because what's changed is it's not as fun, it's not as I don't know it's not as it's not as peaceful times as it is with a newborn or a young baby, holding that baby. There's nothing like that, but the one thing that a teenager or older kid could give you that a baby can't is that joy of watching them accomplish what they want to accomplish, watching them succeed. Oh, my gosh. There's nothing better than that.

But now our government is teaching do we have the ads? Do we have the ads of this is an actual ad for food stamps. Listen.

(Audio played.)

Glenn: Stop. So I can feed my family right when money's tight. The whole thing sounds like I can go off and on food stamps. It would take an act of God for me to go on food stamps. This one is not so bad because it's Mom. It's Mom. She's got two boys she's raising on her own. She's got two jobs. Okay. Do you have the ad, the other ad from the one where it's the woman the woman says, Hey, we've got food stamps, talking to the neighbor?

(Audio played.)

Glenn: Stop, stop. It is good to know you can get food when you really need it. It is. We should be there for each other. It should be the last resort. I'm really hard on this because my grandfather and my father told me we don't ever take money from the government and so it bothers me. We should be there for each other. I personally think you should be there, churches or whatever, your family, if your family can't do it, great. Go to church. If your church can't do it, got to have another organization. Fine. Last resort. Do you know what food stamps tells me? Food stamps tells me that you have no safety net whatsoever. Food stamps tell me that you need more friends, you need more interaction with organizations. You've got to be involved in an organization that's doing things these for people, so when you hit these tough times, you can be there and they can say, Judy, I know you've been here for us, serving people for a long time. Now it's your turn, because sometimes we all need help.

I mean, do we have our own, I mean, because we need some commercials for food stamps.

(Insider audio contains Glenn's food stamp commercials... Not an Insider, sign-up today!)

This week on the Glenn Beck Podcast, Glenn spoke with Vox co-founder Matthew Yglesias about his new book, "One Billion Americans: The Case for Thinking Bigger."

Matthew and Glenn agree that, while conservatives and liberals may disagree on a lot, we're not as far apart as some make it seem. If we truly want America to continue doing great things, we must spend less time fighting amongst ourselves.

Watch a clip from the full interview with Matthew Yglesias below:


Find the full podcast on Glenn's YouTube channel or on Blaze Media's podcast network.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

'A convenient boogeyman for misinformation artists': Why is the New York Times defending George Soros?

Image source: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images

On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday, Glenn discussed the details of a recent New York Times article that claims left-wing billionaire financier George Soros "has become a convenient boogeyman for misinformation artists who have falsely claimed that he funds spontaneous Black Lives Matter protests as well as antifa, the decentralized and largely online, far-left activist network that opposes President Trump."

The Times article followed last week's bizarre Fox News segment in which former House Speaker Newt Gingrich appeared to be censored for criticizing Soros (read more here). The article also labeled Glenn a "conspiracy theorist" for his tweet supporting Gingrich.

Watch the video clip below for details:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The former ambassador to Russia under the Obama Administration, Michael McFaul, came up with "7 Pillars of Color Revolution," a list of seven steps needed to incite the type of revolution used to upend Eastern European countries like Ukraine and Georgia in the past two decades. On his TV special this week, Glenn Beck broke down the seven steps and showed how they're happening right now in America.

Here are McFaul's seven steps:

1. Semi-autocratic regime (not fully autocratic) – provides opportunity to call incumbent leader "fascist"

2. Appearance of unpopular president or incumbent leader

3. United and organized opposition – Antifa, BLM

4. Effective system to convince the public (well before the election) of voter fraud

5. Compliant media to push voter fraud narrative

6. Political opposition organization able to mobilize "thousands to millions in the streets"

7. Division among military and police


Glenn explained each "pillar," offering examples and evidence of how the Obama administration laid out the plan for an Eastern European style revolution in order to completely upend the American system.

Last month, McFaul made a obvious attempt to downplay his "color revolutions" plan with the following tweet:

Two weeks later, he appeared to celebrate step seven of his plan in this now-deleted tweet:



As Glenn explains in this clip, the Obama administration's "7 Pillars of Color Revolution" are all playing out – just weeks before President Donald Trump takes on Democratic candidate Joe Biden in the November election.

Watch the video clip below to hear more from Glenn:


Watch the full special "CIVIL WAR: The Way America Could End in 2020" here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Start your free trial and get $20 off a one-year subscription with code BANTHIS.

Modern eugenics: Will Christians fight this deadly movement?

Photo by Olga Kononenko on Unsplash

Last month, without much fanfare, a new research paper disclosed that 94 percent of Belgian physicians support the killing of new-born babies after birth if they are diagnosed with a disability.

A shocking revelation indeed that did not receive the attention it demanded. Consider this along with parents who believe that if their unborn babies are pre-diagnosed with a disability, they would choose to abort their child. Upwards of 70 percent of mothers whose children are given a prenatal disability diagnosis, such as Down Syndrome, abort to avoid the possibility of being burdened with caring for a disabled child.

This disdain for the disabled hits close to home for me. In 1997, my family received a letter from Michael Schiavo, the husband of my sister, Terri Schiavo, informing us that he intended to petition a court to withdraw Terri's feeding tube.

For those who do not remember, in 1990, at the age of 26, Terri experienced a still-unexplained collapse while at home with Michael, who subsequently became her legal guardian. Terri required only love and care, food and water via feeding tube since she had difficulty swallowing as a result of her brain injury. Nonetheless, Michael's petition was successful, and Terri's life was intentionally ended in 2005 by depriving her of food and water, causing her to die from dehydration and starvation. It took almost two excruciating weeks.

Prior to my sister's predicament, the biases that existed towards persons with disabilities had been invisible to me. Since then, I have come to learn the dark history of deadly discrimination towards persons with disabilities.

Indeed, some 20 years prior to Germany's T4 eugenics movement, where upwards of 200,000 German citizens were targeted and killed because of their physical or mental disability, the United States was experiencing its own eugenics movement.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas documented some of this history in his concurring opinion in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., Justice Thomas describes how eugenics became part of the academic curriculum being taught in upwards of 400 American universities and colleges.

It was not solely race that was the target of the U.S. eugenics movement. Eugenicists also targeted the institutionalized due to incurable illness, the physically and cognitively disabled, the elderly, and those with medical dependency.

In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down Roe v. Wade, which wiped out pro-life laws in nearly every state and opened the floodgates to abortion throughout the entirety of pregnancy. Since then, 60 million children have been killed. Abortion as we know it today has become a vehicle for a modern-day eugenics program.

Since the Catholic Church was established, the Truth of Christ was the greatest shield against these types of attacks on the human person and the best weapon in the fight for equality and justice. Tragically, however, for several decades, the Church has been infiltrated by modernist clergy, creating disorder and confusion among the laity, perverting the teachings of the Church and pushing a reckless supposed “social justice" agenda.

My family witnessed this firsthand during Terri's case. Church teaching is clear: it is our moral obligation to provide care for the cognitively disabled like Terri. However, Bishop Robert Lynch, who was the bishop of the Diocese of St. Petersburg, Florida, during Terri's case, offered no support and was derelict in his duties during the fight for Terri's life.

Bishop Lynch had an obligation to use his position to protect Terri from the people trying to kill her and to uphold Church teaching. Indeed, it was not only the silence of Bishop Lynch but that of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), which also remained silent despite my family's pleas for help, that contributed to Terri being needlessly starved and dehydrated to death.

My family's experience, sadly, has turned out to be more of the rule than the exception. Consider what happened to Michael Hickson. Hickson was a 36-year-old, brain-injured person admitted to a Texas hospital after contracting COVID-19. Incredibly—and against the wishes of Michael's wife—the hospital decided not to treat Michael because they arbitrarily decided that his “quality of life" was “unacceptably low" due to his pre-existing disability. Michael died within a week once the decision not to treat him was imposed upon him despite the efforts of his wife to obtain basic care for her husband.

During my sister's case and our advocacy work with patients and their families, it would have been helpful to have a unified voice coming from our clergy consistently supporting the lives of our medically vulnerable. We desperately need to see faithful Catholic pastoral witness that confounds the expectations of the elite by pointing to Jesus Christ and the moral law.

A Church that appears more concerned with baptizing the latest social and political movements is a Church that may appear to be “relevant," but one that may also find itself swallowed up by the preoccupations of our time.

As Catholics, we know all too well the reluctance of priests to preach on issues of abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and other pro-life issues. We have heard that the Church cannot risk becoming too political.

At the same time, some within the Church are now openly supporting Black Lives Matter, an organization that openly declares itself hostile to the family, to moral norms as taught by the Church, and whose founders embrace the deadly ideology of Marxism.

For example, Bishop Mark J. Seitz of El Paso, Texas, knelt in prayer with a cardboard sign asserting his support for this ideology.

Recently, during an online liturgy of the mass, Fr. Kenneth Boller at The Church of St. Francis Xavier in New York, led the congregation with what appears to sound like questions affirming the BLM agenda. Moreover, while reading these questions, pictures of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery, assumed victims of racial injustice, were placed on the altar of St. Francis Xavier Church, a place typically reserved for Saints of the Catholic Church.

Contrast these two stories with what happened in the Diocese of Lafayette, Indiana, where Rev. Theodore Rothrock of St. Elizabeth Seton Church fell victim to the ire of Bishop Timothy Doherty. Fr. Rothrock used strong language in his weekly church bulletin criticizing the Black Lives Matter movement and its organizers. Consequently, Bishop Doherty suspended Fr. Rothrock from public ministry.

In 1972, Pope Pius VI said, “The smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God." It seems that too many of our clergy today are enjoying the smell.

I encourage all who are concerned about the human right to life and about Christ-centered reforms in our culture and our Church to raise your voices for pastoral leadership in every area of our shared lives as Christian people.

Bobby Schindler is a Senior Fellow with Americans United for Life, Associate Scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, and President of the Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network.