Glenn Beck: Science not settled?


RELATED STORY

Ocean Cooling to Briefly Halt Global Warming, Researchers Say


Glenn:  I mean, there's just ‑‑ there's absolutely no common sense, but why would there be?  In a world where this could be the actual headline, I don't know who saw this on Drudge last night, ocean cooling to briefly help global warming.  This is one of the most amazing stories I have ever read in my life.  You know, I told you before I have a big box of things that I'm saving for my children, the history as it has happened as I have seen it, and what happens is I take the newspapers every day and I go and I say, if I see something that's important or a letter that comes in or whatever and I put it in the box and I'll write a little note or whatever and I save it and then someday, after I'm long gone, they can go through it on the throw it out or they can just look through and have some laughs on, Dad was crazy, wasn't he?

This one is getting a special ‑‑ I'm going to put this one in a Ziploc bag, just to make sure this one's not too brittle when they actually read it.  April 30th, parts of North America and Europe may naturally cool over the next decade.  What?  It may naturally cool?  I thought the earth we had screwed up its thermostat.  As shifting ocean currents temporarily blunt the global warming effect caused by mankind.  Average temperatures in areas such as California and France may drop over the next 10 years.

You know, out of all the places where the temperature should drop, it shouldn't be California and France.  This is going to be influenced by colder flows in the north Atlantic, this according to a report today in the institution based in Keel, Germany.  Temperatures worldwide may stabilize over the next 10 years.  The study was based on sea surface currents that move around the world and vary from decade to decade.  This regional cooling effect my temporarily neutral eyes the long‑term warming phenomena that caused by heat trapping greenhouse gases building up and the earth.  Those national climate variations could be stronger than the global warming trend over the next 10 years period.  Without knowing that, you might erroneously think that there is no global warming going on.

Hang on just a second.  The natural climate variations could be stronger than the global warming trend?

Stu:  Wait, now.  Glenn.  You misread that because the science is settled and the natural variations aren't going to factor in.  It's just going to warm‑up ‑‑

Glenn:  No.  I have it here.  This is from the research scientists at the Met Office Hadley Centre in UK.

Stu:  No, no.  I understand what you're saying.  I know the sources, but what I'm saying is that when ‑‑ natural variations have nothing to do with it.  Demands COT closes the globe to warm and it will continue to warm for the next ‑‑

Glenn:  No.  This is ‑‑ that was the accepted science.

Stu:  It was the consensus was settled.  There is no immediate to look at it anymore.

Glenn:  This is and this is now settled.

Stu:  It was settled yesterday.

Glenn:  No ‑‑ yeah.  This came out yesterday.

Stu:  But it was settled.  It wouldn't change.  So, yesterday's would be the same as today.

Glenn:  Stu, Stu, they were wrong the day before yesterday, but they're not right yesterday.  The day before yesterday.

Stu:  Uh‑huh.

Glenn:  All right?

Stu:  Right.

Glenn:  They were wrong.  So, the science is settled.  These are natural climate variations that are going to be stronger than the global warming trend, just for the next 10 years.

Stu:  But wait a minute.  There hasn't been any scientists out there.  They don't exist, who have been saying natural climate is really the force out there.

Glenn:  They do, but those are the people ‑‑ we never landed on the moon.  Those people said that natural variations might affect this.

Stu:  You're saying there were scientists saying this the entire time.

Glenn:  Those were cooks.

Stu:  But you're saying it's right and it's settled today.

Glenn:  They're still cooks.

Stu:  How are they cooks ‑‑

Glenn:  Excuse me.  Excuse me.  Stop questioning science.  Stu, have you read the IPCC report?

Stu:  I've read ‑‑

Glenn:  Have you read the report?

Stu:  Well, I haven't ‑‑

Glenn:  I think we have our answer there.  No need to listen to him.  If we don't experience warming over the next 10 years, that doesn't mean that the greenhouse gas warming is not with us.  It's just cooling and not warming, but the greenhouse warming will still be with us.

Stu:  So, if we didn't have greenhouse warming, it would be getting much cooler right now?  So, you're saying that right now we're being saved by big oil?

Glenn:  Long‑term climate changes in the north Atlantic religion affect the hurricane activity in the Atlantic.  Excuse me.  Don't we have a consensus now that hurricanes are not caused by global warming?  Didn't that just come out, as well?  Because they were trying to explain away why the hurricanes haven't been getting worse?

Stu:  Oh, no.  That's still the consensus.  That's still the scientific consensus.  Again, the hurricanes have been just taking a break for the past few years.

Glenn:  Right.  This would mean that the .3‑degree Celsius global average temperature rise which has been predicted for the next decade by the enter governmental panel on climate change may not happen.  This according to the Science Journal Nature.  It may not happen.  However, it will just pick right back up in about 10 years.  The effect of rising fossil fuel emissions will meet that warming will accelerate again after 2015, when the natural trends in the oceans veer back towards warming, according to the computer models.  So, their computer models never predicted this but don't worry.  Their computer models predict that after 10 years the computer models will be right.

Science did it again. It only took 270 million years, but this week, scientists finally solved the mystery that has kept the world up at night. We finally know where octopuses come from: outer space. That explains why they look like the aliens in just about every alien movie ever made.

RELATED: Changes in technology can be cause for concern, but THIS is amazing

It turns out octopuses were aliens that evolved on another planet. Scientists haven't determined which one yet, but they've definitely narrowed it down to one of the planets in one of the galaxies. Hundreds of millions of years ago (give or take a hundred), these evolved octopus aliens arrived on Earth in the form of cryopreserved eggs. Now, this part is just speculation, but it's possible their alien planet was on the verge of destruction, so Mom and Dad Octopus self-sacrificially placed Junior in one of these cryopreserved eggs and blasted him off the planet to save their kind.

This alien-octopus research, co-authored by a group of 33 scientists, was published in the Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology journal. I'm sure you keep that on your nightstand like I do.

Anyway, these scientists say octopuses evolved very rapidly over 270 million years. Which sounds slow, but in evolutionary terms, 270 million years is like light speed. And the only explanation for their breakneck evolution is that they're aliens. The report says, “The genome of the Octopus shows a staggering level of complexity with 33,000 protein-coding genes — more than is present in Homo sapiens."

Lucky for us, they landed in the water. Otherwise, we might be octopus pets.

They mention that the octopus' large brain, sophisticated nervous system, camera-like eyes, flexible bodies and ability to change color and shape all point to its alien nature. Octopuses developed those capabilities rather suddenly in evolution, whereas we're still trying to figure out the TV remote.

These biological enhancements are so far ahead of regular evolution that the octopuses must have either time-traveled from the future, or “more realistically" according to scientists, crash-landed on earth in those cryopreserved egg thingies. The report says the eggs arrived here in “icy bolides." I had to look up what a “bolide" is, and turns out it's a fancy word for a meteor.

So, to recap: a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, an alien race of octopuses packed their sperm-bank samples in some meteors and shot them toward Earth. Lucky for us, they landed in the water. Otherwise, we might be octopus pets.

President Trump's approval rating is rising, and Democrats — hilariously — can't seem to figure out what's going on. A few months ago Democrats enjoyed a sixteen point lead over Republicans, but now — according to CNN's recent national survey — that lead is down to just THREE points. National data from Reuters shows it as being even worse.

The Democratic advantage moving towards the halfway mark into 2018 shows that Republicans are only ONE point behind. The president's public approval rating is rising, and Democrats are nervously looking at each other like… “umm guys, what are we doing wrong here?"

I'm going to give Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi a little hint. We know that the Left has enjoyed a “special relationship" with the media, but they might want to have a sit down with their propaganda machine. The mainstream media is completely out of control, and Americans are sick of it. We're DONE with the media.

RELATED: The mainstream media wants you to believe Trump is waging war on immigrants — here's the truth

Look what has been going on just this week. The president called MS-13 gang members animals, but that's not the story the media jumped on. They thought it was more clickable to say that Trump was calling all immigrants animals instead. In the Middle East, the media rushed to vilify Israel instead of Hamas. They chose to defend a terror organization rather than one of our oldest allies.

Think about that. The media is so anti-Trump that they've chosen a violent street gang AND A GLOBAL TERROR ORGANIZATION as their torch-bearing heroes. Come on, Democrats. Are you seriously baffled why the American people are turning their backs on you?

Still not enough evidence? Here's the New York Times just yesterday. Charles Blow wrote a piece called "A Blue Wave of Moral Restoration" where he tried to make the case that the president and Republicans were the enemy, but — fear not — Democrat morality was here to save the day.

Here are some of these cases Blow tries to make for why Trump is unfit to be President:

No person who treats women the way Trump does and brags on tape about sexually assaulting them should be president.

Ok, fine. You can make that argument if you want to, but why weren't you making this same argument for Bill Clinton? Never mind, I actually know the reason. Because you were too busy trying to bury the Juanita Broaddrick story.

Let's move on:

No person who has demonstrated himself to be a pathological liar should be president.

Do the words, “You can keep your doctor" mean anything to the New York Times or Charles Blow? I might have saved the best for last:

No person enveloped by a cloud of corruption should be president.

I can only think of three words for a response to this: Hillary Frigging Clinton.

Try displaying a little consistency.

If the media really wants Donald Trump gone and the Democrats to take over, they might want to try displaying a little consistency. But hey, maybe that's just too much to ask.

How about starting with not glorifying terrorist organizations and murderous street gangs. Could we at least begin there?

If not… good luck in the midterms.

In the weeks following President Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital, the mainstream media was quick to criticize the president's pro-Israel stance and make dire predictions of violent backlash in the Middle East. Fast forward to this week's opening of the US Embassy in Jerusalem and the simultaneous Palestinian “protests" in Gaza.

RELATED: Just another day in Iran: Parliment chants death to America after Trump pulls out of nuclear deal

Predictably, the mainstream media chastised Israel for what they called “state-sanctioned terrorism" when the IDF stepped in to protect their country from so-called peaceful Palestinian protesters. Hamas leaders later admitted that at least 50 of the 62 Palestinians killed in the clashes were Hamas terrorists.

“In our post-modern media age, there is no truth and nobody even seems to be looking for it …. This is shamefully clear in the media especially this week with their coverage of the conflict between the border of Israel and the Gaza strip," said Glenn on today's show. He added, “The main media narrative this week is about how the IDF is just killing innocent protesters, while Hamas officials have confirmed on TV that 50 of the 62 people killed were working for Hamas."

The mainstream media views the Palestinians as the oppressed people who just want to share the land and peacefully coexist with the people of Israel. “They can't seem to comprehend that in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, only one side is actively trying to destroy the other," surmised Glenn.

Watch the video above to hear Glenn debunk the “peaceful Palestinian protest" fallacy.

Here are a few headlines regarding the protests in Israel: 'Global protests grow after Israeli killing of Palestinian demonstrators,' the Guardian. 'Israel kills dozens at Gaza Border,' the New York Times. 'Palestinians mourn dead in Gaza as protests continue,' CNN. 'Over 50 Palestinians in massive protest are killed by Israeli military, bloodiest day in Gaza since 2014 war,' ABC News. 'Gaza begins to bury its dead after deadliest day in years,' BBC.

RELATED: Here's why Israel used lethal force during mass protests in Gaza yesterday

In each, the spoken or unspoken subject of the sentence and villain of the story is Israel. Innocent Palestinians murdered by the cruel Israelis. This is the narrative that the mainstream media has promulgated. Few have mentioned that the majority of the “protestors" that died were members of Hamas, the militant (and highly anti-Semetic) Sunni-Islamist organization that has been labeled a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department.

A senior Hamas official told reporters that 50 of the 59 people killed in Monday's protests were members of Hamas, and the remainder were “from the people." So…they were all Hamas.

As usual, mention of such membership has been left out of the mainstream media's anti-Israel, pro-Islam narrative.

As usual, mention of such membership has been left out of the mainstream media's anti-Israel, pro-Islam narrative. Maybe they think of Palestinians as underdogs and they love a good scrap. Well, they aren't underdogs. But their outburst have been glorified for so long that it's near impossible to disagree with that narrative.