Glenn Beck: Racist in West Virginia




Fun Fact - West Virginia is located in the United States, to the west of the state of Virginia.

RELATED LINKS


- W. Virginia keeps distance from Obama (I hear hs's a Muslim)


- Nuclear survival in West Virginia


GLENN: Well, I read a great article in the Financial Times.  Oh, yes, Financial Times and they've got a crack staff there.  They have uncovered one of the biggest mysteries surrounding Hillary Clinton's big lead in the state of West Virginia.  It is, ooh, it is frightening.  They have figured out exactly what has been going on.  They sent out whiz kid journalist Andrew ward and the Financial Times busted out all the stops in order to break the big story.  In-depth investigation, what's going on, Hillary Clinton's big lead in West Virginia and Kentucky.  In-depth news:  In an investigation.  It begins and pretty much ends with an interview with a voter, Leonard Simpson.  "Hi, my name's Leonard Simpson."  He is a voter that, of course, represents every single voter in West Virginia, in case you didn't know that, West Virginia.  67-year-old retired coal miner.  67 years old, voting for John McCain over Barack Obama.  Why?  Quoting the Financial Times, "Well, I heard Obama's one of them Muslims and his wife's an atheist," said Simpson.  Now, being the astute journalist that he is, ward knew he was on to something and immediately came to this conclusion.  Quote:  "Mr. Simpson's remarks help explain why Mr. Obama's trailing Hillary Clinton, his Democratic rival, by 40 percentage points ahead of Tuesday's primary election in the heavily white and rural state."  My gosh.  I did read that right.  Andrew Ward, what a racist.  Why is he pointing out that the state is white and she's way ahead with whites?  My goodness.  Yes, you read it there in the Financial Times.  It's heavily white!  Ahhhhh!  Heavily rural!  Let me do it again.  Heavily rural!  Ahhhh!  That explains it.  No wonder Barack is losing there.  He can't actually campaign in the state because there's a good chance those racists clinging to their guns and their religion might yell, "Get off my land!  (Gunfire)" And they might say it repeatedly in his direction.  But don't worry, Obama supporters, Andrew Ward and the journalists are on hand and they have words to comfort you.  "A landslide victory in West Virginia will do little to improve Hillary Clinton's fading hopes of winning the Democratic nomination because Mr. Obama has almost an insurmountable lead in the overall race."

Let me ask you a question.  Since when did Andrew Ward decide that he was going to choose the next President of the United States?  Has anybody else noticed how the media has selected the winner here?  It's almost -- and I say almost -- almost enough to make you feel bad for Hillary Clinton, isn't it?  I mean, you actually do kind of feel bad because you're consistent.  I try to be consistent.  I know you try to be consistent.  I know there's a lot of people that listen to talk radio and they're like, "Get off my land."  But I believe the majority of people are just right thinking Americans who just want to see justice done.  They don't care about left or right.  They care about right and wrong.  They don't care about the stupid parties, you know?  Heck, call me crazy but when I had the President rolling around in the office with a intern in a blue dress, I didn't like it so much.  And if I ever found out that George Bush was doing that, I wouldn't like it so much.  You kind of feel bad for Hillary Clinton.  She's standing up going, wait a minute, hang on just a second; I thought we were friends.  Yeah, yeah... no.  Who was using whom?

"Landslide victory in West Virginia will do little to improve her futile and fading hopes of winning the Democratic nomination."  Well, thank goodness that Andrew's allowed to -- you know, and he's around to let everybody know that the whole country is not as racist as West Virginia is because it's -- boy, I mean -- you know, we have a lot of listeners in West Virginia.  "Of course you do.  That racist show, I listen to it every day."  So if you can -- I mean, if you can see all of the numbers through the little, you know, slit holes in your sheet and will try to understand.  I know when you call it will sound a little like this because you'll be talking through the sheet, but you can call and tell us in West Virginia, I mean, if this is what you believe, that you're pretty sure that Obama's not a Muslim, one of them Muslims.

Now, just because Andrew Ward, you know, he wants to point out that the rest of the country isn't as racist as West Virginia, which I believe, I believe -- you know, there is something to this.  I mean, let's be honest.  It is the only state in the union that I'm aware of that has sent a, you know, a representative from their state that was a former member of the KKK.  That's weird, I must have that wrong because he's a Democrat, but that's a different story.  "Doesn't mean there's not going to be any ramifications."  That means other things that are going to happen, for those of you who are in West Virginia, because of this story.

Scathing journalistic investigation like this one, you know he's not going to let up.  He says "Tuesday's contest is likely to raise fresh doubts about whether the U.S. is ready to elect its first black President."  Hold on just a second.  Obama's black?  Ahhhhh!  I didn't -- wow.  Why didn't somebody tell me that!  I would have been -- why did I look at all of his policies?  I just would have been against him right from the getgo because he was black!  Oh, crap.  All of that wasted time.  Well, not mine because I can't read.  But somebody, we had somebody read and then speak slowly and tell me his policies.  The U.S. is ready -- are we ready to elect a first black President?  "Oh, I don't think so.  Oh, no, we can't elect anybody that looks different than us.  Whew."  And if he wasn't running, we certainly wouldn't have been able to elect our first woman, you know, now that a black guy's running, women shmomen, doesn't make any difference at all.  Oh, big deal, she's a woman."  It was a big deal when we selected Nancy Pelosi.  "Are we ready as a nation to have the first speaker of the House be a woman?"  Wait a minute.  Nancy Pelosi's a woman?  Ahhhhh!  Hang on.  No, I'm getting clarification that she's actually not.  So I don't know what that means but, whew, for a minute there I thought (laughing), I thought we had a woman in congress.  Oh, man.  Oh, I'm just looking at her policies and I'm like, this is just so stupid.  Only a woman can come off with it.  But then I realized we would never elect a woman (laughing).  Hold it just a second.  I just got word -- she is a woman?  Ahhhh!

Mr. Ward continues in the Financial Times to say, "We're not ready to elect our first black man."  When I read this, I think, wow, that is so obvious.  I mean, they will be like, "Oh, no, it has something to do with him, you know, being in a whack job church for 20 years, a church that even Oprah said, okay, this is spooking me, and she left after two years.  I mean, it couldn't have anything to do with it or the fact that his wife says, "That's the first time I've ever been proud of America" or says that "You know, America's just mean, you know."  Couldn't have anything to do with those things.  Oh, don't you hate it?  Don't you hate it when people say, "Oh, I'm not going to vote for Obama because, you know, he's hanging out with William Ayers, a guy, you know, who went to jail for bombing the Pentagon and several other U.S. Government facilities and banks and things like that and then is still proud of it and says the only problem is that it, you know, blow up enough things.  Other than that, I mean..." don't you hate those people who are on TV, such racists, taking on little things such as -- where is it?  I read this one in the paper today.  Listen to this one (laughing).  "Barack Obama has dumped one of his advisors for meeting with the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas."  Big deal!  "Robert Malley who acted as informal advisor to Barack Obama on his Mideast policy told the Times in London that he was in regular contact with the militant group Hamas and Obama's now dropping him."  It couldn't have anything to do with that (laughing).  No, no.  It's that he's black.  Ahhhhh!

You know what?  Even after all of these things, we are so racist, we hate black people so much that even after all of these other things, you know, the Hamas thing, you know, hanging out with the bombers, Khalidi, the wife that's like, "Mean," all of that stuff and, "The chickens are coming home to roost," all of that stuff, he's still winning.  That's how racist we really are.  My gosh, all the hatred to put him out front.  Can you believe how much we hate black people, to make him, you know, the leading candidate!  Ohhhh, what a horrible group of people we are.  Hmmm.

We ignore all of those facts just because we're racists.  Hmmm.  As though we need to present further evidence to support his ironclad case that West Virginia is just, oh, a cesspool of black hating bigots, journalist Andrew Ward of the Financial Times had to make sure he went the extra mile to prove his point.  After all, some racists in West Virginia might be reading this, in the off chance they could find one racist that could actually read, you know, and then somebody's going to have to, you know, explain it to them, just so Andrew could help them understand the folly of their ways.  He said, "West Virginia is hostile territory for Mr. Obama because it has few of the African-Americans and affluent college educated whites."  Here he is again quoting Hillary Clinton.  Why would he quote Hillary Clinton, as if it's a fact?  "The college educated whites that provide his strongest support.  The state has the lowest college graduation rate in the U.S., the second lowest median household income, and one of the highest proportions of white residents at 96%."  Well, Andrew, yes, indeed, bravo, that was fantastic.  Andrew could have really, you know, rested well and said, "oh, boy, I don't think I could, I don't think I could do any -- I mean, if I had a hatchet and the residents of West Virginia there in front, I don't think I could have chopped them up any more."  But he went in and gave it a college try because he did go to college, you know.  "Knowing that he had uncovered the mysteries surrounding the big lead for Hillary Clinton in West Virginia, he realized, "But this is an important journalistic piece.  Why stop now when there's even so much more evidence that everyone in West Virginia is a hate mongering bigot.  A visit to Mingo County," he writes, "A Democratic stronghold"... Democratic stronghold, trying to get my arms around the fact that these are white racists and yet they're Democrats.  It doesn't really work.  I tell you what, Andrew, if I were you, I would have said leave out the Democratic stronghold because people might remember that you're calling Democrats racists and remember we in the journalistic circles are going to need to call Republicans racists in just a few weeks.

There in the heart of the Appalachian coal fields, emphasis on the word "Coal," not because Barack Obama is probably the leading guy to stop coal because of global warming but just coal because it's black -- I'm just sayin'.  I believe we forgot something here.  Coal is black.  Ahhh!  Reveals the scale of Mr. Obama's challenge because it has a gun shop on Main Street and churches dotted throughout the town.  Williamson is the kind of community evoked by Mr. Obama's controversial comments last month about bitter small town voters who cling to their guns and religion."  When I read this at first, I was with the people of West Virginia and then I realized they had a gun shop on Main Street!  Ahhh!  And a church!  Or maybe even two!  (Laughing).  Oh, poor Obama.  How will he ever be able to compete with these bottom-dwelling hicks and their guns and the churches.  Finally Andrew topped off his mountain of racist evidence from West Virginia with notes from the 22 people he questioned.  And I believe there are only about 30 people that live in West Virginia.  So he talked to almost all of them.  He said most said they mistrusted Obama because of doubts about his patriotism and values stemming from his "Cosmopolitan background."  I just want to recreate this scene for you.  "So I'm from the Financial Times.  This is a delightful place here.  You don't have any teeth."  "Well, you got funny looking teeth from England."  "So tell me, what is it about Mr. Obama that you just do not like so very much."  "Well, I was making out with my sister last night and we was having a farting contest and we said -- she's got a deeper voice than me -- well, mainly because he's black but then, I don't know, something's wrong -- you know, I just don't have a uncomfortable kind of gassy feeling (farting noises) about his cosmopolitan background."  "Oh, yes, the cosmopolitan background," who says cosmopolitan background!  "Well, that's what your sister -- that's what my sister said but I got my own thoughts."  "Yes, yes, speak up, old chum.  What is it?"  "Well, I got a problem with his ezotic name."  Yep, Andrew Ward from the Financial Times nailed it once again.  These people know America.  We're safe.

It's time for our April 29, 2019 edition of our Candidate Power Rankings. We get to add two new candidates, write about a bunch of people that have little to no chance of winning, and thank the heavens we are one day closer to the end of all of this.

In case you're new here, read our explainer about how all of this works:

The 2020 Democratic primary power rankings are an attempt to make sense out of the chaos of the largest field of candidates in global history.

Each candidate gets a unique score in at least thirty categories, measuring data like polling, prediction markets, fundraising, fundamentals, media coverage, and more. The result is a candidate score between 0-100. These numbers will change from week to week as the race changes.

The power rankings are less a prediction on who will win the nomination, and more a snapshot of the state of the race at any given time. However, early on, the model gives more weight to fundamentals and potentials, and later will begin to prioritize polling and realities on the ground.

These power rankings include only announced candidates. So, when you say "WAIT!! WHERE'S XXXXX????" Read the earlier sentence again.

If you're like me, when you read power rankings about sports, you've already skipped ahead to the list. So, here we go.

See previous editions here.

20. Wayne Messam: 13.4 (Last week: 18th / 13.4)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

A former staffer of Wayne Messam is accusing his wife of hoarding the campaign's money.

First, how does this guy have "former" staffers? He's been running for approximately twelve minutes.

Second, he finished dead last in the field in fundraising with $44,000 for the quarter. Perhaps hoarding whatever money the campaign has is not the worst idea.

His best shot at the nomination continues to be something out of the series "Designated Survivor."

Other headlines:

19. Marianne Williamson: 17.1 (Last week: 17th / 17.1)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

Marianne Williamson would like you to pay for the sins of someone else's great, great, great grandparents. Lucky you!

Williamson is on the reparations train like most of the field, trying to separate herself from the pack by sheer monetary force.

How much of your cash does she want to spend? "Anything less than $100 billion is an insult." This is what I told the guy who showed up to buy my 1989 Ford Tempo. It didn't work then either.

Other headlines:

18. John Delaney: 19.7 (Last week: 15th / 20.3)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

Good news: John Delaney brought in $12.1 million in the first quarter, enough for fifth in the entire Democratic field!

Bad news: 97% of the money came from his own bank account.

Other headlines:

17. Eric Swalwell: 20.2 (Last week: 16th / 20.2)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

The Eric Swalwell formula:

  • Identify news cycle
  • Identify typical left-wing reaction
  • Add steroids

Democrats said there was obstruction in the Mueller report. Swalwell said there “certainly" was collusion.

Democrats said surveillance of the Trump campaign was no big deal. Swalwell said there was no need to apologize even if it was.

Democrats said William Barr mishandled the release of the Mueller report. Swalwell said he must resign.

Democrats say they want gun restrictions. Swalwell wants them all melted down and the liquid metal to be poured on the heads of NRA members. (Probably.)

16. Seth Moulton: 20.6 (NEW)

Who is Seth Moulton?

No, I'm asking.

Moulton falls into the category of congressman looking to raise his profile and make his future fundraising easier— not someone who is actually competing for the presidency.

He tried to block Nancy Pelosi as speaker, so whatever help he could get from the establishment is as dry as Pelosi's eyes when the Botox holds them open for too long.

Moulton is a veteran, and his military service alone is enough to tell you that he's done more with his life than I'll ever do with mine. But it's hard to see the road to the White House for a complete unknown in a large field of knowns.

Don't take my word for it, instead read this depressing story that he's actually telling people on purpose:

"I said, you know, part of my job is take tough questions," Moulton told the gathered business and political leaders. "You can ask even really difficult questions. And there was still silence. And then finally, someone in the way back of the room raised her hand, and she said, 'Who are you?' "

Yeah. Who are you?

15. Tim Ryan: 21.6 (Last week: 14th / 20.7)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

When you're talking to less than sixteen people in Iowa one week after your launch, you don't have too much to be excited about.

Ryan did get an interview on CNN, where he also talked to less than sixteen people.

He discussed his passion for the Dave Matthews Band, solidifying a key constituency in the year 1995.

Other headlines:

14. Tulsi Gabbard: 25.2 (Last week: 14th / 25.9)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

Tulsi Gabbard torched Kamala Harris in fundraising!!!!! (Among Indian-American donors.)

No word on who won the coveted handi-capable gender-neutral sodium-sensitive sub-demographic.

She received a mostly false rating for her attack on the Trump administration regarding its new policy on pork inspections, a topic not exactly leading the news cycle. Being from Hawaii, the state which leads the nation in Spam consumption, she was probably surprised when this didn't go mega viral.

Other headlines:

13. Andrew Yang: 27.2 (Last week: 12th / 27.1)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

Yang has a few go-to lines when he's on the campaign trail, such as: "The opposite of Donald Trump is an Asian man who likes math." Another is apparently the Jeb-esque "Chant my name! Chant my name!"

Yang continues to be one of the more interesting candidates in this race, essentially running a remix of the "One Tough Nerd" formula that worked for Michigan Governor Rick Snyder.

I highly recommend listening to his interview with Ben Shapiro, where Yang earns respect as the only Democratic presidential candidate in modern history to actually show up to a challenging and in-depth interview with a knowledgeable conservative.

But hidden in the Shapiro interview is the nasty little secret of the Yang campaign. His policy prescriptions, while still very liberal, come off as far too sane for him to compete in this Stalin look-alike contest.

Other headlines:

12. Jay Inslee: 30.4 (Last week: 11th / 30.4)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

If you read the Inslee candidate profile, I said he was running a one-issue climate campaign. This week, he called for a climate change-only debate, and blamed Donald Trump for flooding in Iowa.

He also may sign the nation's first "human composting" legalization bill. He can start by composting his presidential campaign.

Other headlines:

11. John Hickenlooper: 32.2 (Last week: 10th / 32.0)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

John Hickenlooper was sick of being asked if he would put a woman on the ticket, in the 0.032% chance he actually won the nomination.

So he wondered why the female candidates weren't being asked if they would name a male VP if they won?

Seems like a logical question, but only someone who is high on tailpipe fumes would think it was okay to ask in a Democratic primary. Hickenlooper would be better served by just transitioning to a female and demanding other candidates are asked why they don't have a transgendered VP.

Other headlines:

10. Julian Castro: 35.7 (Last week: 9th / 36.2)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

Lowering expectations is a useful strategy when your wife asks you to put together an Ikea end table, or when you've successfully convinced Charlize Theron to come home with you. But is it a successful campaign strategy?

Julian Castro is about to find out. He thinks the fact that everyone thinks he's crashing and burning on the campaign trail so far is an "advantage." Perhaps he can take the rest of the field by surprise on Super Tuesday when they finally realize he's actually running.

Other headlines:

9. Kirsten Gillibrand: 38.1 (Last week: 8th / 37.8)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

Gillibrand wants you to know that the reason her campaign has been such a miserable failure so far, is because she called for a certain senator to step down. The problem might also be that another certain senator isn't a good presidential candidate.

She also spent the week arm wrestling, and dancing at a gay bar called Blazing Saddle. In this time of division, one thing we can all agree on: Blazing Saddle is a really solid name for a gay bar.

Other headlines:

8. Amy Klobuchar: 45.1 (Last week: 7th / 45.5)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

Klobuchar is attempting a run in the moderate wing of the Democratic primary, which would be a better idea if such a wing existed.

She hasn't committed to impeaching Donald Trump and has actually voted to confirm over half of his judicial nominees. My guess is this will not be ignored by her primary opponents.

She also wants to resolve an ongoing TPS issue, which I assume means going by Peter Gibbons' desk every morning and making sure he got the memo about the new cover sheets.

Other headlines:

7. Elizabeth Warren: 45.3 (Last week: 6th / 46.0)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

Elizabeth Warren is bad at everything she does while she's campaigning. I don't really even watch Game of Thrones, and the idea that Warren would write a story about how the show proves we need more powerful women makes me cringe.

Of course, more powerful people of all the 39,343 genders are welcome, but it's such a transparent attempt at jumping on the back of a pop-culture event to pander to female voters, it's sickening.

We can only hope that when she's watching Game of Thrones, she's gonna grab her a beer.

Other headlines:

6. Cory Booker: 54.9 (Last week: 5th / 55.5)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

Booker is tied with Kamala Harris for the most missed Senate votes of the campaign so far. He gets criticized for this, but I think he should miss even more votes.

Booker is also pushing a national day off on Election Day—because the approximately six months of early voting allowed in every state just isn't enough.

Of course, making it easier to vote doesn't mean people are going to vote for Booker. So he's throwing trillions of dollars in bribes (my word, not his) to seal the deal.

Bookermania is in full effect, with 40 whole people showing up to his appearance in Nevada. Local press noted that the people were of "varying ages," an important distinction to most other crowds, which are entirely comprised of people with the same birthday.

Other headlines:

5. Robert Francis O’Rourke: 60.2 (Last week: 4th /62.6)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

Kirsten Gillibrand gave less than 2% of her income to charity. The good news is that she gave about seven times as much as Beto O'Rourke. Robert Francis, or Bob Frank, also happens to be one of the wealthiest candidates in the race. His late seventies father-in-law has been estimated to be worth as much as $20 billion, though the number is more likely to be a paltry $500 million.

He's made millions from a family company investing in fossil fuels and pharmaceutical stocks, underpaid his taxes for multiple years, and is suing the government to lower property taxes on a family-owned shopping center.

He's also all but disappeared. It's a long race, and you don't win a nomination in April of the year before election day. If he's being frugal and figuring out what he believes, it might be a good move.

But it's notable that all the "pretty boy" hype that Bob Frank owned going into this race has been handed over to Mayor Pete. Perhaps Beto is spending his time working on curbing the sweating, the hand gestures, and the issues with jumping on counters like a feline.

Other headlines:

4. Pete Buttigieg: 62.9 (Last week: 3rd / 62.9)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

When we first put candidates in tiers earlier this year, we broke everyone into five categories from "Front Runners" to "Eh, no." In the middle is a category called "Maybe, if everything goes right," and that's where we put Pete Buttigieg.

Well, everything has gone right so far. But Mayor Pete will be interested to learn that the other 19 candidates in this race are not going to hand him this nomination. Eventually, they will start saying negative things about him (they've started the opposition research process already), and it will be interesting to see how Petey deals with the pressure. We've already seen how it has affected Beto in a similar situation.

The media has spoken endlessly about the sexual orientation of Buttigieg, but not every Democratic activist is impressed. Barney Frank thinks the main reason he's getting this amount of attention is because he is gay. And for some, being a gay man just means you're a man, which isn't good enough.

When you base your vote on a candidate's genitals, things can get confusing.

Other headlines:

3. Kamala Harris: 68.6 (Last week: 1st / 69.1)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

There are a couple of ways to view the Harris candidacy so far.

#1 - Harris launched with much fanfare and an adoring media. She has since lost her momentum. Mayor Pete and former Mayor Bernie have the hype, and Kamala is fading.

#2 - Harris is playing the long game. She showed she can make an impact with her launch, but realizes that a media "win" ten months before an important primary means nothing. She's working behind the scenes and cleaning up with donations, prominent supporters, and loads of celebrities to execute an Obama style onslaught.

I tend to be in category 2, but I admit that's somewhat speculative. Harris seems to be well positioned to make a serious run, locking up more than double the amount of big Clinton and Obama fundraisers than any other candidate.

One interesting policy development for Harris that may hurt her in the primary is her lack of utter disgust for the nation of Israel. There's basically one acceptable position in a Democratic primary when it comes to Israel, which is that it's a racist and terrorist state, existing only to torture innocent Palestinians.

Certainly no one is going to mistake Harris for Donald Trump, but a paragraph like this is poison to the modern Democratic primary voter:

"Her support for Israel is central to who she is," Harris' campaign communications director, Lily Adams, told McClatchy. "She is firm in her belief that Israel has a right to exist and defend itself, including against rocket attacks from Gaza."

Just portraying the rocket attacks as "attacks" is controversial these days for Democrats, and claiming they are responses to attacks indicates you think the Jeeeewwwwwwwws aren't the ones responsible for the start of every hostility. Heresy!

Someone get Kamala a copy of the 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion' before she blows her chance to run the free world.

2. Bernie Sanders: 69.2 (Last week: 2nd / 68.3)

CANDIDATE PROFILE

If Bernie Sanders hates millionaires as much as he claims, he must hate the mirror. As a millionaire, it might surprise some that he donated only 1% to charity. But it shouldn't.

It's entirely consistent with Sandersism to avoid giving to private charity. Why would you? Sanders believes the government does everything better than the private sector. He should be giving his money to the government.

Of course, he doesn't. He takes the tax breaks from the evil Trump tax plan he derides. He spends his money on fabulous vacation homes. He believes in socialism for thee, not for me.

Yes, this is enough to convince the Cardi B's of the world, all but guaranteeing a lock on the rapper-and-former-stripper-that-drugged-and-stole-from-her-prostitution-clients demographic. But can that lack of consistency hold up in front of general election voters?

If Bernie reads this and would like a path to credibility, clear out your bank account and send it here:

Gifts to the United States
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Funds Management Branch
P.O. Box 1328
Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328


Other headlines:

1. Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.: 78.8 (NEW)

Joe has run for president 113 times during his illustrious career, successfully capturing the presidency in approximately zero of his campaigns.

However, when the eternally woke Barack Obama had a chance to elevate a person of color, woman, or anything from the rainbow colored QUILTBAG, he instead chose the oldest, straightest, whitest guy he could find, and our man Robinette was the beneficiary.

Biden has been through a lot, much of it of his own making. Forget about his plagiarism and propensity to get a nostril full of each passing females' hair, his dealings while vice president in both Ukraine and China are a major general election vulnerability— not to mention a legal vulnerability for his children. But hey, win the presidency and you can pardon everyone, right?

His supposed appeal to rust belt voters makes him, on paper, a great candidate to take on Trump. The Clinton loss hinged on about 40,000 voters changing their mind from Hillary to Donald in a few states—the exact areas where victory could possibly be secured by someone named "Middle Class Joe" (as he alone calls himself.)

No one loves Joe Biden more than Joe Biden, and there's a relatively convincing case for his candidacy. But we must remember this unquestionable truth: Joe Biden is not good at running for president.

He's a gaffe machine that churns out mistake after mistake, hoping only to have his flubs excused by his unending charisma. But, will that work without the use of his legendary groping abilities? Only time, and a few dozen unnamed women, will tell.

Also, yes. Robinette is really his middle name.

If only Karl Marx were alive today to see his wackiest ideas being completely paraded around. He would be so proud. I can see him now: Sprawled out on his hammock from REI, fiddling around for the last vegan potato chip in the bag as he binge-watches Academy Awards on his 70-inch smart TV. In between glances at his iPhone X (he's got a massive Twitter following), he sips Pepsi. In his Patagonia t-shirt and NIKE tennis shoes, he writes a line or two about "oppression" and "the have-nots" as part of his job for Google.

His house is loaded with fresh products from all the woke companies. In the fridge, he's got Starbucks, he loves their soy milk. He's got Ben & Jerry's in the freezer. He tells everyone that, if he shaved, he'd use Gillette, on account of the way they stand up for the Have-Nots. But, really, Marx uses Dollar Shave Club because it's cheaper, a higher quality. Secretly, he loves Chic-Fil-A. He buys all his comic books off Amazon. The truth is, he never thought people would actually try to make the whole "communism" thing work.

RELATED: SOCIALISM: This is the most important special we have done

Companies have adopted a form of socialism that is sometimes called woke capitalism. They use their status as corporations to spread a socialist message and encourage people to do their part in social justice. The idea of companies in America using socialism at all is as confusing and ridiculous as a donkey in a prom dress: How did this happen? Is it a joke? Why is nobody bursting out in laughter? How far is this actually going to go? Does someone actually believe that they can take a donkey to prom?

Companies have adopted a form of socialism that is sometimes called woke capitalism.

On the micro level, Netflix has made some socialist moves: The "like/dislike" voting system was replaced after a Netflix-sponsored stand-up special by Amy Schumer received as tidal wave of thumb-downs. This summer, Netflix will take it a step further in the name of squashing dissent by disabling user comments and reviews. And of course most of us share a Netflix account with any number of people. Beyond that, they're as capitalist as the next mega-company.

Except for one area: propaganda. Netflix has started making movie-length advertisements for socialism. They call them "documentaries," but we know better than that. The most recent example is "Knock Down the House," which comes out tomorrow. The 86-minute-long commercial for socialism follows four "progressive Democrat" women who ran in the 2018 midterms, including our favorite socialist AOC.

Here's a snippet from the movie so good that you'll have to fight the urge to wave your USSR flag around the room:

This is what the mainstream media wants you to believe. They want you to be moved. They want the soundtrack to inspire you to go out and do something.

Just look at how the mainstream media treated the recent high-gloss "documentary" about Ilhan Omar, "Time for Ilhan." It received overwhelmingly bad ratings on IMDb and other user-review platforms, but got a whopping 93% on the media aggregator Rotten Tomatoes.

This is exactly what the media wants you to think of when you hear the word socialism. Change. Empowerment. Strength. Diversity. They spend so much energy trying to make socialism cool. They gloss right over the unbelievable death toll. BlazeTV's own Matt Kibbe made a great video on this exact topic.

Any notion of socialism in America is a luxury, made possible by capitalism. The woke companies aren't actually doing anything for socialism. If they're lucky, they might get a boost in sales, which is the only thing they want anyway.

We want to show you the truth. We want to tell you the stories you won't hear anywhere else, not on Netflix, not at some movie festival. We're going to tell you what mainstream media doesn't want you to know.

Look at how much history we've lost over the years. They changed it slowly. But they had to. Because textbooks were out. So people were watching textbooks. It was printed. You would bring the book home. Mom and dad might go through it and check it out. So you had to slowly do things.

Well, they're not anymore. There are no textbooks anymore. Now, you just change them overnight. And we are losing new history. History is being changed in realtime.

RELATED: 'Good Morning Texas' joins Glenn to get an inside look at Mercury Museum

You have to write down what actually is happening and keep a journal. Don't necessarily tell everybody. Just keep a journal for what is happening right now. At some point, our kids won't have any idea of the truth. They will not have any idea of what this country was, how it really happened. Who were the good guys. Who were the bad guys. Who did what.

As Michelle Obama said. Barack knows. We have to change our history. Well, that's exactly what's happening. But it's happening at a very rapid pace.

We have to preserve our history. It is being systematically erased.

I first said this fifteen years ago, people need clay plots. We have to preserve our history as people preserved histories in ancient days, with the dead see scrolls, by putting them in caves in a clay pot. We have to preserve our history. It is being systematically erased. And I don't mean just the history of the founding of our country. I mean the history that's happening right now.

And the history that's happening right now, you're a problem if you're a conservative or a Christian. You are now a problem on the left, if you disagree and fall out of line at all. This is becoming a fascistic party. And you know what a fascist is. It doesn't matter if you're a Democrat or a Republican or an independent. If you believe it's my way or the highway, if you believe that people don't have a right to their opinion or don't have a right to their own life — you could do be a fascist.

Christianity might seem pretty well-protected in the U.S., but that's not the case in many parts of the globe.

On Easter Sunday, suicide bombers made the news for killing 290 innocent Christians in Sri Lanka and injuring another 500. On Tuesday, ISIS claimed responsibility for the massacre. Of course, the Western world mourned this tragic loss of life on a holy day of worship, but we forget that this isn't an isolated incident. Indeed, Christians are discriminated at extreme levels worldwide, and it needs to be brought to light. And whenever we do highlight brutal persecutions such as the Easter bombings in Sri Lanka, we need to call them what they are — targeted attacks against Christians. Sadly, many of our politicians are deathly afraid to do so.

RELATED: Hey media, there is absolutely a war on Christians!

A 2018 Pew Research Center study found that Christians are harassed in 144 countries — the most of any other faith — slightly outnumbering Muslims for the top of the list. Additionally, Open Doors, a non-profit organization that works to serve persecuted Christians worldwide, found in their 2019 World Watch List that over 245 million Christians are seriously discriminated against for their religious beliefs. Sadly, this translates into 4,136 Christians killed and 2,625 either arrested, sentenced, imprisoned, or detained without trial over the year-long study period. And when it comes to churches, those in Sri Lanka were merely added to a long list of 1,266 Christian buildings attacked for their religion.

These breathtaking stats receive very little coverage in the Western world. And there seems to be a profound hesitation from politicians in discussing the issue of persecution against Christians. In the case of the Sri Lanka bombings, there's even a reluctance to use the word "Christian."

After the horrific Pittsburgh Synagogue and New Zealand Mosque shootings, Democrats rightfully acknowledged the disturbing trend of targeted attacks against Jews and Muslims. But some of these same politicians refer to the Sri Lanka bombings with careless ambiguity.

So why is it so hard for our leaders to acknowledge the persecutions Christians face?

Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, for instance, certainly did — calling the incursions "attacks on Easter worshippers." Understandably, the term confused and frustrated many Christians. Although, supporters of these politicians argued the term was appropriate since a recent Associated Press report used it, and it was later picked up by a variety of media outlets, including Fox News. However, as more Democrats like 2020 presidential candidate Julián Castro and Rep. Dan Kildee continued to use the phrase "Easter worshippers," it became clear that these politicians were going out of their way to avoid calling a spade a spade.

So why is it so hard for our leaders to acknowledge the persecutions Christians face? For starters, Christianity in democratic countries like the U.S. is seen differently than in devastated countries like Somalia. According to Pew Research, over 70% of Americans are Christian, with 66% of those Christians being white and 35% baby boomers. So while diverse Christians from all over the world are persecuted for their faith—in the U.S., Christians are a dominant religion full of old white people. This places Christians at the bottom of progressives' absurd intersectional totem poll, therefore leaving little sympathy for their cause. However, the differing experiences of Christians worldwide doesn't take away from the fact that they are unified in their beliefs.

By refusing to name the faith of the Sri Lankan martyrs, politicians are sending a message that they have very little, if no, concern about the growing amount of persecution against Christians worldwide.

Martyrs don't deserve to be known as "Easter worshippers." They should be known by the Christian faith they gave their lives for. Decent politicians need to call the tragedy in Sri Lanka what it is — a vicious attack on the Christian faith.

Patrick Hauf (@PatrickHauf) is a writer for Young Voices and Vice President of Lone Conservative. His work can be found in the Washington Examiner, Townhall, FEE, and more.