Glenn's definition of a conservative


Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Webcam, an exclusive feature available only to Glenn Beck Insiders. Learn more...

GLENN:  888-727-BECK.  Welcome to news radio 750 KXL in Portland, Oregon.  Thanks for joining the family of Glenn Beck program.  Glad you're here.  Let me go to Ken in Philadelphia.  Hello, Ken thanks for listening to WPHT.  What's up?

CALLER:  Hi, Glenn.  I've been listening to your program on and off for years and I'm not sure anymore what it means to be a conservative.  I was wondering if you would actually have a dialogue with me about what that means.

GLENN:  Sure.

CALLER:  Okay.  Because, like, for instance I don't -- I hear talk about a lot, like I guess soon that it means like being conservative financially.  You know, I understand that it means pro business, so you don't want to limit business maybe.  Does it mean being religious?  What does it mean?

GLENN:  Well, let me ask you, Ken.  Are we having an honest dialogue here or do you have an agenda?

CALLER:  No, an honest dialogue because like, for instance, one of the things I can't understand is it seems like religion is associated with conservatism and yet like a lot of the business that you do is judging and throwing first stones and I don't see that as a religious value as Jesus taught it.  And so I don't understand that as a basis for your program.  But I also don't understand the dividing of the country as a basis for it.  So in order for me to understand what conservatism is and its use of the word is used a lot.  And a lot of times if somebody disagrees with you on the station or with any of the hosts, it seems like if somebody disagrees, you are automatically branded a liberal and even if you are not, and you are thrown off the station and then talked over.  So I don't really have an agenda.  I just want to know what it means because it makes it difficult for me to understand and have a conversation with somebody when I don't know what the words mean and what people are talking about.

GLENN:  Sure, okay.  So now we understand your agenda, that you do have an axe to grind.  And that's fine.  I don't know what your political background is.  I'm not going to call you a liberal.  I have no idea if you're a liberal.  So I have no idea, but I appreciate you being honest and telling me where you're coming from and showing me that we're not having an honest dialogue.

So instead of operating under the cloak of, gee, Glenn, what is a conservative, why don't we just take these issues that you have that is really the reason for your phone call and take them one by one.  Let's start with the religion thing.  What is your question again on the religion issue and how it revolves -- I cannot answer for any other show.  I can answer for my actions.  So let's be specific on my actions, Ken.

CALLER:  Okay.  So you're -- you're letting me talk now.  That's nice.  It's not like I -- you think I have an axe to grind.  Maybe you can just tell me what your belief is on conservatives and I won't even -- I won't grind my axe.  Just tell me what it is and then let me talk about it.

GLENN:  Ken, you don't set the rules for the program.  And first of all, nobody is shutting you down.  I let you talk for three minutes.  So I'm not here to play a game with you.  It is a total waste of time.  If you'd like to have a real dialogue and make progress on something, we can.  You're not really interested in what a conservative means.  You have problems and issues with what I do on the air.  So let's deal with those.  Why play a game?

CALLER:  Okay.  So you're thinking that this is an agenda thing.  I just honestly think that it feels like a lot of your work divides the country.  It sets people against each other.  And like, for instance your --

GLENN:  Give me the examples.  Let's deal in specifics here.

CALLER:  Well, for example, you were just talking about some woman with -- previously to me coming on here and you were talking about her situation and yet without actually knowing the person, knowing their actual -- the depth of their situation when you speak sort of glossing over the information just based on maybe some information that's been filtered through the liberal media as it were.

GLENN:  Right.  No, I -- here's --

CALLER:  Under the circumstance it seems hard to really understand what their situation is.

GLENN:  Sure.

CALLER:  So in judging that person, in judging the situation, you are really not being fair to that individual or the story.

GLENN:  Sure.  I'm not judging anybody in the article.  What I was quoting is a story that ran in the Washington Post.  Now, I'm sorry if you think I'm being divisive by reading verbatim a story that ran in the Washington Post, but I don't know how I can be accused of being divisive by, again, reading the story verbatim.

CALLER:  Well, it's your tone, what you choose to read and how you say it in such a way where you're casting, obviously you are opining and setting the judgment on that person.

GLENN:  No, I'm not setting a judgment on any person.  I don't even know who wrote that story.  I know it ran in the Washington Post.  I am making a comment by reading that story, I'm making a comment on how is it the media would like to paint Americans as racist.  Yesterday, if you listened to yesterday's show, the story yesterday in the media was how all of the white people in West Virginia are racist because Hillary is winning by such an overwhelming number there.  The story on Friday in the media was how, by Hillary Clinton saying that she has the white vote, he has the black vote, that she somehow or another is a racist for pointing out that fact.  Today is just the third day in a very, very long cycle to come, about anybody who is against Barack Obama.  Again, the stories -- the story's facts were little, a little thin to be able to paint anybody who's against Barack Obama as a racist.  Even the campaign will not do that and yet the media needs to paint people against Barack Obama as a racist.

CALLER:  Well, I understand your point about that the story and unfortunately I didn't hear it yesterday.  And I'm actually not calling to grind an axe about racism.  My actual intention here was literally to find out what it means to be a conservative so when I'm listening to you, I can understand --

GLENN:  Yeah, I don't believe that.

CALLER:  -- I can understand what it means.

GLENN:  I wish I believed you on that, but I don't.

CALLER:  I wish you did.

GLENN:  I do, too, and we can all sing Kumbayah.  Ken, here is the question.  So let's go back to where you said I was being divisive.  Again, how was I being divisive by reading the story and trying to make the point that the media is saying that we are -- that if you're against Barack Obama, you're a racist, when that is not true.

CALLER:  You are absolutely right.  If I had been calling about that comment and I was talking about that --

GLENN:  Well, that was the comment that you used.  Would you like to try another one and maybe we could take that one away.

CALLER:  Well, no, no, no, no, no.

GLENN:  No, no, no.  Let's -- I mean, if you are going to say that I'm divisive and that was just a bad example but it was the one that you brought up, let's go with another example of yours.  Because if I'm divisive, then let's go with another example because maybe you've just misunderstood.  You said there were a lot of things that I do that are divisive.  So just give me another one and let's take that one on.

CALLER:  Well, I think, like, for instance when you said that you'd like to believe that I didn't have an agenda and stuff like that.  You say I'm being Kumbayah, you are sort of implying --

GLENN:  That would happen after your phone call.  So how would that be a motivation of something that bothers you when that happened after you made the phone call?

CALLER:  Well, you are sort of making it an implication here that I'm a liberal by being --

GLENN:  No, I never said you were a liberal.  I have no idea.  I plainly said that to you.  I don't know if you are a liberal or not.  I don't really care if you're a liberal or not.

CALLER:  Aren't you trying to by saying the Kumbayah thing and making people think that I'm --

GLENN:  No, sir.  Look, you are not disagreeing with me?  I'm having a hard time following this conversation.  So are you not disagreeing with me?

CALLER:  Actually all I asked you in the original, you know, question was what is it to be a conservative.

GLENN:  And you know what, Ken, I wanted to take your phone call because when I saw it said, "What is the definition of a conservative, what does it mean anymore," I took your phone call first because I would love to talk about that.  But I will only discuss that with an honest broker.  You are not an honest broker.  You are immediately coming and saying, "But a lot of people tie religion in, and I see you do things that don't coincide with what I believe is religion."  Well, give me one of those examples.  Because what I want to do is have the conversation of what a conservative is, but you don't want to really have that.  You'd like to try to pin me in a corner.  So that's fine.  Now that we know what your intent is, let's just have an honest conversation and tell me what your problem is on the show because -- or on me because maybe, like we've seen in the only example that you've given me so far, you were wrong.

CALLER:  Well, that's an interesting way of dealing with it, but you are still not answering my question.  What is it to be a conservative?  There it is.  You ask me what it is.  Go for it.

GLENN:  Ken, here it is.  To be a conservative is, in my definition, is somebody that believes in the power of the individual, somebody that believes, please let me make my decisions, that I have a right to succeed and not be penalized for it.  I have a right to fail and have no one run to me if I don't want them to run to me.  A conservative believes I have a right to manage my family, I have a right to discipline my family in the way I see fit, as long as it is not criminal.  A conservative believes I have the right to worship God, I have a right to worship the God of my understanding, and I do not have the right to jam my version of God down anybody else's throat or my version of no God down anybody's throat.  A conservative believes live and let live.  That's what a conservative believes.  A conservative believes in the smallest amount of government, the smallest government you can get without anarchy.  That's what a conservative believes.

CALLER:  Then I'm a conservative.  Nice talking to you.  Thank you very much for --

GLENN:  You bet, Ken.  See?  And who thought he was a liberal?  Not me.  He just ended it, "I guess I'm a conservative."  Well, good.  Then we agree.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" to explain how mail-in ballots are typically disqualified during recounts at a far higher rate than in-person, Election Day ballots, and why this is "good news" for President Donald Trump's legal battle over the election.

"One of the things that gives the greatest cause for optimism is, this election ... there's a pretty marked disparity in terms of how the votes were distributed. On Election Day, with in-person voting, Donald Trump won a significant majority of the votes cast on in-person voting on Election Day. Of mail-in voting, Joe Biden won a significant majority of the votes cast early on mail-in voting," Cruz explained.

"Now, here's the good news: If you look historically to recounts, if you look historically to election litigation, the votes cast in person on Election Day tend to stand. It's sort of hard to screw that up. Those votes are generally legal, and they're not set aside. Mail-in votes historically have a much higher rate of rejection … when they're examined, there are a whole series of legal requirements that vary state by state, but mail-in votes consistently have a higher rate of rejection, which suggests that as these votes begin being examined and subjected to scrutiny, that you're going to see Joe Biden's vote tallies go down. That's a good thing," he added. "The challenge is, for President Trump to prevail, he's got to run the table. He's got to win, not just in one state but in several states. That makes it a lot harder to prevail in the litigation. I hope that he does so, but it is a real challenge and we shouldn't try to convince ourselves otherwise."

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Subscribe to BlazeTV today with our BEST DEAL EVER for $30 off with promo code GLENN.

Fox News senior meteorologist Janice Dean is perhaps even more disgusted with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) for his coronavirus response than BlazeTV's Stu Burguiere (read what Stu has to say on the subject here), and for a good reason.

She lost both of her in-laws to COVID-19 in New York's nursing homes after Gov. Cuomo's infamous nursing home mandate, which Cuomo has since had scrubbed from the state's website and blamed everyone from the New York Post to nursing care workers to (every leftist's favorite scapegoat) President Donald Trump.

Janice joined Glenn and Stu on the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday to ask why mainstream media is not holding Gov. Cuomo — who recently published a book about his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic — accountable?

"I'm vocal because I have not seen the mainstream media ask these questions or demand accountability of their leaders. [Cuomo] really has been ruling with an iron fist, and every time he does get asked a question, he blames everybody else except the person that signed that order," Janice said.

"In my mind, he's profiting off the over 30 thousand New Yorkers, including my in-laws, that died by publishing a book on 'leadership' of New York," she added. "His order has helped kill thousands of relatives of New York state. And this is not political, Glenn. This is not about Republican or Democrat. My in-laws were registered Democrats. This is not about politics. This is about accountability for something that went wrong, and it's because of your [Cuomo's] leadership that we're put into this situation."

Watch the video excerpt from the show below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

As America grows divided and afraid to disagree with the Democrats' woke plan for America, Megyn Kelly is ready to fight back for the truth. For nearly two decades, she navigated the volatile and broken world of the media. But as America leans on independent voices more than ever, she's breaking new ground with "The Megyn Kelly Show."

She joined the latest Glenn Beck Podcast to break down what's coming next after the election: Black Lives Matter is mainstream, leftists are making lists of Trump supporters, and the Hunter Biden scandal is on the back burner.

Megyn and Glenn reminisce about their cable news days (including her infamous run-in with then-presidential candidate Donald Trump) and to look into the chaotic and shady world of journalism and the growing entitlement it's bred. For example, many conservatives have been shocked by how Fox News handled the election.

Megyn defended Fox News, saying she believes Fox News' mission "is a good one," but also didn't hold back on hosts like Neil Cavuto, who cut off a White House briefing to fact check it — something she never would have done, even while covering President Obama.

Megyn also shared this insightful takeaway from her time at NBC: "Jane Fonda was an ass."

Watch the full podcast here:

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Glenn Beck has had enough of exposing scandal after scandal, just to have everyone look the other way: Benghazi, Hillary Clinton's emails, Joe and Hunter Biden's dealings in Ukraine and China … the list goes on, but no consequences are paid. Now, the media have called the election for Joe Biden and insist no one can question it. But for many of the more than 71 million people who voted for President Trump, our search for the truth isn't over yet.

On his Wednesday night special this week, Glenn called out the left's long list of alleged corruption that has gone unchecked and stressed that Donald Trump's legal team must be allowed to go through the process of investigating the multiple allegations of election fraud to ensure our voting systems are fair.

"I don't know about you, but I'm tired. I am worn out. I am fed up!" Glenn said during his opening monologue. "I've had enough. I am tired of exposing corruption, doing our homework, even going overseas and having documents translated to make sure they're exactly right, [and] presenting the evidence ... except, once we expose it, nothing happens. Nobody goes to jail. Nobody pays for a damn thing any more!"

Watch the short video clip from the full show below:


Because the content of this show is sure to set off the Big Tech censors, the full episode is only be available on BlazeTV. The election and its aftermath are the most important stories in America, so we're offering our most timely discount ever: $30 off a one-year subscription to BlazeTV with code "GLENN."