Stu blog: Kansas City Star responds to your “absolutely ludicrous and insulting” comparisons

And now, ombudsing the ombudsmen.   The Kansas City Star watchdog posted a blog in response to our segment regarding “The assassination attempt you never heard of.”  Quickly, it was an assassination attempt on the governor of Missouri by a crazy person in 2010, that also happened to be a Che Guevara -quoting, left wing- rioting lunatic.

Multiple readers have asked me about something they heard on the Glenn Beck show recently. I wasn't listening, so I can't vouch for what was said, though his official website has an account of it.

I have zero interest in tracking down how this story originated or has filtered through the Internet, but three things are indisputable:

1. The story was big local news, occupying the lead position on the Sept. 15 and 16 Star front pages, both times with the color mugshot of the suspect. Every other major news source in town also played it very prominently.

Look, it's not his job to be the Glenn Beck watchdog, so I can't criticize him too much for not hearing the segment.  Though, it appears that he has some incorrect impressions on what our issue was with the reporting of the story.  We didn’t say it didn’t make local news.  We, in fact, specifically mentioned the Kansas City Star as one paper who covered the incident. But, of course, that wasn’t the point of the segment that he didn't listen to.

2. Brezik had years earlier been diagnosed with the serious mental illness of paranoid schizophrenia -- something that I believe most reasonable people would agree obviates drawing any conclusions about how his supposed political beliefs may have informed his actions.

Thank you!  This was our exact point on the Tucson shooting.  The obvious mental illness of Jared Lee Loughner should have derailed the political attacks from the beginning.  No one on the show believes that the left should be held responsible for the attempted murder of Missouri’s governor.  We believe that people who actually do the shooting and stabbing, should be held responsible for the shooting and the  stabbing.  Our point was -- in the Loughner case, that’s not how the media covered the story at all.

For example on KansasCity.com:

Day of shooting, bring up possible connection.

Giffords was among the Democratic members of Congress singled out for defeat last spring by former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, who used rifle scope-like crosshairs to single out the 20 seats she wanted to turn Republican.

Next day, act stunned that despite lack of evidence, people are talking about connection.

There's no evidence that Palin's ad contributed to a gunman's decision Saturday to shoot Giffords in a rampage that killed six bystanders and left her gravely wounded with a brain injury. But the shooting is sparking an intense debate over whether incendiary political talk across the country - punctuated with references to guns and the blood of slain politicians - is a real danger, or merely vivid political rhetoric.

Third day, tell the story of the debate as an innocent bystander.

Concerns about the nation’s heated political environment were raised within hours of the shootings, when Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik suggested that “vitriolic rhetoric” might have played a role in triggering the violence.

Our point on this topic was simply to point out that the cases were handled differently.  In most ways, the Missouri case was the one covered CORRECTLY. Our point was that the Arizona case was not.

3. It's nonsense to declare it wasn't reported elsewhere. A cursory check of the Nexis news database shows that it most certainly did play in the media outside this area, in sources as far-flung as The Virginian-Pilot in Norfolk, Va., The Bismarck Tribune in North Dakota, and the National Journal's Hotline. Multiple stories went out on the Associated Press wire, and they surely ran in papers and on websites around the world. (Neither Nexis nor the AP tracks all the places wire content runs, so there's no way to find them all.)

We too, did a “cursory check” and found this:

Factiva/Nexis search of U.S. Newspapers yields 10 articles from 7 sources:

- Charleston Gazette

- Bellville News

- News-Leader

- Kansas City Star

- Tulsa World

- St. Louis Post-Dispatch

- The Virginian-Pilot

-  Associated Press ran 5 wires on the subject between 9/14/2010 and 9/23/2010

We didn’t declare that the incident itself wasn’t reported elsewhere, though I hadn’t heard a word about it personally.  The point was that, unlike Arizona, no one ran with a narrative about his political leanings.  As far as I know, that was not the focus of any of the above stories.  Does anyone honestly believe that if his Facebook page was loaded up with quotes from Sarah Palin that wouldn’t have been a focus of the story?  Honestly?

This incident may be a somewhat-interesting piece of spot news to people outside the KC area, but it certainly isn't a big story. There's no trend or any indication of a conspiracy.

Really?  An attempted assassination of a governor isn’t a big story?  I sorta kinda think it kinda sorta is.

And though I don't often offer my own opinions, I'll say I find it absolutely ludicrous and insulting to compare it to a mass shooting that killed six and wounded 14, including a U.S. District Court judge, a nine-year-old bystander and a U.S. representative.

It depends on how you’re comparing them. Thankfully, the crazy person in Missouri was unsuccessful.  Tragically, the Arizona shooter completed many of his horrific wishes. So, no—there’s no comparison there.   The comparison of the post-tragedy blame game is apt however, because it shouldn’t appear in either case.   Again, the story that was covered more competently was the Missouri case—NOT the Arizona case.

Furthermore, ascribing political import to this particular individual's actions is an extremely close parallel to what Pima County, Ariz. Sheriff Clarence Dupnik has been so roundly criticized for from many sides in the wake of the recent Tuscon shootings.

Ahhhhhh...we can end on an agreement. Che Guevara was a psychotic mass murderer, yet I still don’t blame him for the attack on the governor.  You cannot rationally assign blame for an individual who becomes violent to the commentators they like, the cereal they eat, or the brand of toothpaste they buy.   It is his/her fault.  Period.  This was our point. While the sheriff was criticized by many (the vast majority on the right) it was the media that beat him to the punch by talking about Sarah Palin.  Then they amplified the sheriff's ridiculous argument by treating it as if it was a legitimate angle on this story.  It never was.

As far as I know, The Kansas City Star didn't do anything wrong in their reporting of the Missouri case.  Our problem is with the handling of the aftermath of the Arizona case from almost everyone in the media, which should have been focused on the human tragedy, rather than finger pointing.

Nearly two years after the January 6 riot at the Capitol, the mystery of who planted two pipe bombs outside the Republican and Democratic National Committee offices remains unsolved. Thankfully, the bombs were found and disabled before they could cause any harm, but with their potential for devastating consequences — not to mention the massive investigations into all things relating to Jan.6 — why does it seem like this story has practically fallen off the face of the earth?

No one in the corporate media has even tried to look into it, and the government's narrative that the bombs were meant to be a diversion for the Capitol riot doesn't make sense when you look at the timeline of events.

So, on this week's episode of "Glenn TV," Glenn Beck broke down the timeline of events that led up to the discovery of the bombs and how the facts appear to point toward one sinister conclusion:

  • Security footage reportedly shows that the two pipe bombs were planted in front of the DNC and RNC the day before the riot.
  • Neither bomb was concealed.
  • Then-Vice President-elect Kamala Harris entered the DNC headquarters at approximately 11: 30 am on January 6.
  • At approximately 12:40 pm on January 6, the first pipe bomb was discovered sitting in plain sight outside the DNC headquarters, raising questions as to why the incoming vice president didn't have better security.
  • The pipe bomb had a one-hour kitchen timer that had apparently stopped with 20 minutes left on the timer. (Remember, the bombs were planted on January 5.)
  • The Secret Service reportedly erased their communications from January 5t and January 6 by "accident."

"It doesn't really hit you unless you look at it as a timeline, and then you're like, 'wait a minute that doesn't seem right.' The unsolved mystery of the pipe bomb has been used by the government to show that January 6 riot was part of a larger coordinated attack ... that the bombs were a diversion to get the Capitol police away from the Capitol," Glenn explained.

"But the bomb had a one-hour timer and it was planted at 8 p.m. the night before. So the bomb would have to go off the night before at about 9 p.m. on January 5. How's that a diversion? It's not physically even possible."

Watch the video clip below to hear more or find the full episode of "Unsolved Mysteries: 7 Deep-State SECRETS Biden Wants Buried" here.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The Biden administration has weaponized the federal government against the American people. But officials have hidden most of their attacks behind a secretive and cavernous bureaucracy.

There are so many unsolved mysteries that Joe Biden and the Democrats not only refuse to answer, but in some cases appear as though they are ACTIVELY trying to cover up. Like what happened on January 6? Who is Ray Epps? Who planted the pipe bombs? What’s in Biden’s executive order on elections? What happened to the SCOTUS Dobbs leaker? What’s the COVID origin story? What’s happening with crypto, FTX, and the Central Bank Digital Currency?

These are just a few of the unsolved mysteries that we need to DEMAND answers on. On his Wednesday night special, Glenn Beck outlines a chalkboard that will leave you convinced the DOJ and FBI are LYING to the American people. The more secrets the Deep State holds, the more its power over us grows.

Watch the full episode of "Glenn TV" below:

Unsolved Mysteries: 7 Deep-State SECRETS Biden Wants Buried | Glenn TV | Ep 238

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

'I NEVER thought I'd talk about this': Was Glenn Beck's CHILLING dream actually a WARNING?

(Left) Photo by Charles McQuillan/Getty Images/(Right) Video screenshot

On the radio program this week, Glenn Beck decided to share a very unusual, extremely vivid dream he had ten years ago — a dream he thought he'd never talk about on the air until he began to see it as a warning that we should all know about.

"I never ever thought I would talk about this on the air, but I feel compelled to tell you that seasons have changed again, and it is becoming more and more apparent. You need to know what you're dealing with," Glenn began.

"If you are a long-time listener of this program, you know that one of the reasons I left New York ... was that I had a medical condition. Part of it was brought on by no REM sleep for about 10 years ... and for 10 years, I never had a dream," he explained. "However, during this period I had what could be described as a dream. I do not believe it was."

"In this 'dream' ... I am in a hallway of the White House. And I'm walking into a big room where there's a bunch of cubicles, and people look up like, 'who's walking in?' There are people behind me, but I don't know who they are yet. I just know I'm being pushed forward by them," Glenn continued. "I realize that everybody in the White House is terrified of who's ever behind me ... I glance back and I see people that are in uniforms that I've never seen before. I have seen them since, but that will be for some other time...."

"So, these guys in the uniforms are in the hallway, and one guy says, 'him, him, and him, take them out' ... and I'm the only one still sitting at the table. They go out ... then I hear three gunshots and they say, 'yeah, that happened pretty quickly for them. However, you, we're going to get to know ... because you really have no idea who you're dealing with.' And that's when one of them ... ripped off his face and he was Satan. Or, he was a demon, okay? Horrifying. Then I wake up."

Glenn went on to explain that, while the dream was so vivid and disturbing that he thought about it almost daily for well over a year, it was what happened next — during a discussion with a prominent religious leader — that really hinted his "dream" might actually have been a vision of the future and a warning.

"I will never forget it, and I will never dismiss it," Glenn said of what he learned. "I'm sharing it with you today because you must not dismiss what you're dealing with. We are not in a battle [of] politics ... our whole culture has become evil."

"You have to get to a point where you are going to choose a side. There will be no one left on the benches, and if you think you can sit it out you will end up on the wrong side. I urge you to know who you serve. This is a different time in human experience. This is not normal. None of this is normal," he warned.

Watch the video clip below to hear more from Glenn. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.