VIRTUE SIGNALING: It's time for the NFL to dump the politics

Tom Pennington/Getty Images

Has anybody else noticed how politicized sports have gotten? The NFL is practically three berets away from a socialist revolution. They seem more concerned with dismantling social norms and protesting than with playing football. The Minnesota Vikings announced yesterday they will host a summit and fundraiser for LGBTQ inclusion in sports.

According to LifeSiteNews, the LGBTQ inclusion summit will "include speeches, interviews, and panel discussions with a variety of athletes, coaches, and activists who are homosexual or transgender" and "will be hosted at the team's recently-completed TCO Performance Center."

The summit marks the latest in the NFL's continued advocacy for LGBTQ rights and initiatives. Last year, the league launched NFL Pride, in a bid to "heighten sensitivity to the LGBTQ community" and reinforce "commitment to an inclusive environment in which all employees are welcome."

RELATED: New NFL policy will punish players who protest the national anthem

Fair enough. No one should be harassed or discriminated against in the workplace, but is that really what this is about? Because it kind of seems like there's more going on here. Kind of seems like there's a political, ideological slant to it. At the very least, it's virtue signaling.

The summit is "part of a settlement agreement the Vikings made after [former Vikings punter Chris Kluwe], who is straight, filed a lawsuit against the team in 2014 for allegedly creating a hostile work environment for homosexual and transgender people."

So, yeah, virtue signaling.

Ultimately, the NFL is a private business and, as we saw with the National Anthem kneelers, they can conduct their business however they like, and in turn the consumers can decide whether or not to keep giving them their money.

Mostly, the situation is just strange. Can you imagine how well this partnership would have gone over in the 1970s? Moreover, at what point does being LGBTQ come up during sports? How have we landed in this strange place, where politics and gender and race must be represented within every single interaction?

It's also worth mentioning that most people don't care if an athlete is gay — with the possible exception of transgender athletes, but that's another topic entirely. This tolerance has actually been confirmed by studies and surveys throughout all kinds of sports, in various countries throughout the world. Even countries with, shall we say, a far less tolerant view of the LGBTQ community than we have here in the USA — even people in those countries believe that it doesn't matter. People watch sports to see athleticism, to enjoy the unpredictable fury of sports at its finest.

People watch sports to see athleticism, to enjoy the unpredictable fury of sports at its finest.

Overwhelmingly, regardless of the sport, people do not care about the athletes' sexuality — in fact, most of us would rather not know. We don't watch golf to muse the social significance of gender norms and sexuality. We don't go to a baseball game to meditate on the evils of the patriarchy and the terrors of cultural appropriation. If an athlete is good, who cares what their orientation is? It's certainly not a new idea that LGBTQ can perform in sports. Typically, what sports fans care about is talent. Is the athlete good?

I guarantee that if Liberace rose from the dead tomorrow morning and was suddenly able to play basketball as well as 90s-era Michael Jordan, Chicago Bulls fans would not complain if he joined the team. I think it's fair to say that most people like sports better when they aren't swamped with politics. Keep the politics elsewhere, especially these days, when it's nearly impossible to escape the increasingly intolerant politics of the Left.

Perhaps they could learn a lesson from our friends, the Ancient Greeks. It's no secret that the Ancient Greeks indulged in, well, LGBTQ activities. They were quite fond of the various activities. But they also built a civilization of tremendous importance to humanity as a whole. Philosophy, art and, yes, sports. When they were charged off to war, they didn't slap a Rainbow flag bumper sticker on the back of their chariot. Their sexuality did not define their identity. They were multifaceted human beings, able to go to war or to the theater or to the town hall as a citizen, because citizenry was what mattered, personhood and selfhood. More importantly, they lived in a time when people cared about self and tribe over sexuality and gender. Identity was selfhood, not sexuality.

At the end of the day, who cares if the Minnesota Vikings want to host an LGBTQ event? But they should expect to see an increase in shoulder-padded men traipsing across the stage on Broadway.

UPDATE: Here's how the discussion went on radio. Watch the video below.

Most people like sports better when politics aren't involved

Breaking down the announcement that the Minnesota Vikings will be hosting a summit and fundraiser for LGBTQ inclusion in sports.


Do YOU believe aliens exist? According to our poll, most of you say YES. However, even more of you believe that the government is using the alien whistleblowers to distract us from other pressing stories, like Hunter Biden's illicit business dealings.

So which is the case? If the whistleblower reports are legitimate, then this could be one of the most groundbreaking stories in American history. If not, it could be one of the biggest PSY-OPS the government has ever attempted to distract the American people from what they do NOT want them to see.

On last night's Glenn TV special, "Are Aliens & UFOs a Government Psyop?" Glenn dove into BOTH sides and went through the history of UFO whistleblowers in our country's history—yes, there are many. This is the BALANCED and INFORMED take on the UFO whistleblowers that you WON'T get in the mainstream news cycle.

Do your own homework

Enter your email below to get the EXCLUSIVE research documents, including all of the references and resources Glenn used in last night's Glenn TV special.

If you missed it, be sure to watch the full episode below!

Is the New York Times COOKING THE BOOKS against 'Dark Future'?

Gary Hershorn / Contributor | Getty Images

Glenn's new book, 'Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset's Terrifying Next Phase' remains strong on the New York Times Bestseller List a month after its publication... but should it be ranked higher?

Currently, 'Dark Future' is ranked No.13. on the New York Times Bestselling Non-Fiction list. However, if the list were determined by raw sales alone, 'Dark Future' would have been ranked number SEVEN on the list. Moreover, while Greg Gutfeld's new book, 'The King of Late Night,' has fewer sales than 'Dark Future,' it continues to outrank 'Dark Future,' in the No. 5 slot.

And things get even fishier.

The current New York Times Bestselling nonfiction list excludes several books that outperform the top rankers on the list. For example, Granger Smith's faith-based nonfiction book, 'Like a River,' is excluded from the list, even though it has received nearly TWICE as many sales as the list's No. 1 spot, 'Outlive' by Dr. Peter Attia. Moreover, Chadwick Moore's new biography of Tucker Carlson, which he recently discussed on the Glenn Beck Program, is also excluded from the list, even though it would have outranked Gutfield's 'The King of Late Night' as well.

Several books are excluded that outperform the top rankers on the list.

Could the New York Timespurposefully be excluding and de-ranking books that don't fit their political agenda? This wouldn't be the first time the New York Times has been accused of "cooking the books."

Legendary author James Patterson, who holds the Guinness World Record for the most #1 New York Times bestsellers, recently criticized the list as "inaccurate." Patterson recounted how his recently published book, 'Walk The Blue Line,' which recounted real-life stories of law enforcement officers, wasn't even on the New York Times Bestseller List for the first week after publication, despite its sales outperforming its competitors. Once it was on the list, it continued to rank below books it had significantly outperformed.

This wouldn't be the first time that the New York Times has been accused of "cooking the books."

Patterson took to Twitter (now called X), to post his Letter to the Editor after the New York Times refused to publish it, calling out the double standard in their ranking system.

In response, the Times responded:

Our bestsellers lists are based on detailed analysis of book sales from a wide range of retailers, tens of thousands of brick-and-mortar stores of all sizes, and numerous online book-selling vendors to best represent what is selling across the United States.

However, Patterson hit the nail on the head: "If you don't base it on raw sales, you base it on cooked sales."

Is 'Dark Future,' and the other aforementioned books suffering from the same double standard that Patterson described? The raw sale numbers certainly indicate so. However, the fact that 'Dark Future' continues to rank on the list is a testimony to the book's success and the power of its scathing message against the world's elites.

If you haven't yet ordered Dark Future, click HERE to get your copy and see what all the hype is about. Not a reader? Click HERE to download the Dark Future audiobook, read by Glenn himself, which was ranked in the AP's Top 10 Audiobook List.

POLL: Do aliens EXIST? Or is it just a PSYOP?

Rastan | Getty Images

The nation was taken aback this year when whistleblower David Charles Gorusch, a decorated Air Force veteran, claimed the Department of Defense has a secret team aimed at "retrieving non-human origin technical vehicles, call it spacecraft if you will, non-human exotic origin vehicles that have either landed or crashed."

Talk about UFOs and aliens has typically been siloed to the realm of sci-fi and "conspiracy theories." However, in recent years, publicized evidence of UFOs and whistleblowers, like David Grusch, have brought the once fantastical subjects into the mainstream. Could it be that alien life forms do, in fact, exist? Have they already arrived and been kept secret underneath the government's nose? Or could this all be a ruse to distract us from more pressing stories in the news cycle?

Tomorrow's Glenn TV special will be all about ALIENS. Do they actually exist? Or is the topic a huge "psyop" to distract us from important issues...like Joe Biden's illicit business dealings?

We posted this poll earlier this year after David Gorsuch's bombshell testimony. Has YOUR opinion changed? Let us know in the poll below, and be sure to tune into TOMORROW'S Glenn TV special all about ALIENS.

Do you believe the government has intel about UFOs?

Do you believe the government has intel about alien life?

Do you believe the government is hiding this intel from the general public?

Do you believe alien life exists? 

Do you think the media is using this story to distract us from other issues?

The COMPLETE list of ALL Congress members 80 years and OLDER. Should we care?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images, Drew Angerer / Staff | Getty Images

The aging population of our Congress has become a trending news topic.

Last month 89-year-old Senator Feinstein had to be told what to say during a vote by one of her aides after a nearly two-month medical leave of absence with shingles. More recently, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell had a concerning mental episode while giving a routine press briefing. Not to mention Joe Biden's relentless gaffes. As Glenn said this week, keeping these health-compromised elderly individuals in power is "elder abuse" and just plain "cruel."

Keeping health-compromised, elderly individuals in power is "elder abuse."

Both of these leaders are over 80, and their recent episodes have sparked many to ask: how old is "too old" to serve in Congress? This topic is a delicate one. However, the American people should be able to discuss whether age plays a factor in their representatives' and Senators' ability to carry out their duties in the best interest of their constituents.

How old is "too old" to serve in Congress?

There are 16 Congressmen and women who are 80 years old and older, some of which were born before World War II. There are many more who are on the cusp of 80, well past the normal age of retirement. Below you will find the complete list of ALL 16 Congressmen and women who are 80 and over. Do YOU think age should be a factor in determining your vote? Let us know in the comments below.

Senator Charles Grassley (IA-R): 89 years old

Anna Moneymaker / Staff | Getty Images

Senator Dianne Feinstein (CA-D): 89 years old

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Rep. Grace Napolitano (CA-D): 86 years old

PATRICK T. FALLON / Contributor | Getty Images

Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton (AL-D): 85 years old

Win McNamee / Staff | Getty Images

Rep. Harold Rogers (KY-R): 85 years old

Bill Clark / Contributor | Getty Images

Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr. (NJ-D): 85 years old

Bill Clark / Contributor | Getty Images

Rep. Maxine Waters (CA-D): 84 years old

Chip Somodevilla / Staff |Getty Images

Rep. Steny H. Hoyer (MD-D): 83 years old

Anna Moneymaker / Staff | Getty Images

Rep. James E. Clyburn (SC-D): 82 years old

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): 82 years old

Rob Carr / Staff | Getty Images

Senator Bernie Sanders (VT-I): 81 years old

Alex Wong / Staff | Getty Images

Rep. Danny K. Davis (IL-D): 81 years old

Kris Connor / Stringer | Getty Images

Rep. John Carter (TX-R): 81 years old

Bill Clark / Contributor | Getty Images

Senator Mitch McConnell (KY-R): 80 years old

Drew Angerer / Staff | Getty Images

Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-CA): 80 years old

Scott J. Ferrell / Contributor | Getty Images (2011)

Rep. Frederica S. Wilson (D-CA): 80 years old

Joe Skipper / Stringer | Getty Images