RADIO

3 RADICAL moves Democrats could make in the 2024 election

2024 is off to a fast start with the beginning of election season only weeks away and Democrats are already playing dirty. Glenn reviews the latest legal challenges against former president Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, including the Maine Secretary of State's attempt to take him off the ballot — even though he hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection! "This should tell you everything you need to know about the Democrats," Glenn says. But he doesn't believe they'll stop there. Glenn predicts 3 radical moves the Democrats could make as we get closer to November. Will they throw Trump in jail? Will they kick President Biden out of the race? And will they run someone even more radical — Michelle Obama? — in his place?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, welcome, Stu. How are you?

STU: Glenn, very well.

I think you're amazingly accurate here, when you point out, that we're in that situation, where we are hitting the -- the ground running here.

GLENN: Oh, yeah.

STU: We jump in. You come back from holiday break. And you're less than two weeks away from Iowa.

We launch into basically full-out election mode, immediately.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah. Thank you.

STU: We have lots of technical --

GLENN: It's a new year. It is a new year.

STU: New year, new buttons. So you go right into this. I think so many people, you spend the previous year kind of like figuring out what the field looks like. What's this race? What this is? Right. And it's got to be one of the strangest races anyone has ever looked at before. We have one side saying, all they care about is democracy, as they're trying to get the other guy removed from the ballot.

GLENN: I have to tell you. I -- I accidental believe that this is their strategy. First of all, I don't know if you heard about Rudy Giuliani. He's broke now. They've wiped his savings out. He is absolutely broke.

STU: There was a ruling against him for nine figures, right?

GLENN: Yeah. And so he's broke. And that is -- that is the lesson. The lesson is: We'll bankrupt you. We'll destroy you. We'll smear you. You will not survive.

And the process, really is also the punishment. It doesn't matter if they win or not. It really doesn't. They'll just keep going.

With Donald Trump, the way these states -- I mean, I could not believe that they're invoking the 14th Amendment. And saying, well, you know, a part of it insurrection. He's not even been charged with an insurrection. Not even been charged.

So they're taking him off, because of an insurrection.

Something he was never even charged with.

STU: In any -- they have 91 charges against him.

None of them are insurrection.

GLENN: None of them are.

So now you have two states taking him off the ballot.

And there's 30 lining up.

STU: Yeah. Plenty of them are going to try to do it.

GLENN: Let me tell you something: This should tell you everything you need to know, about the Democrats.

It should tell you how radical, they actually are. They're saying that they want to preserve democracy. But this isn't true.

Let me tell you what I think is going to happen.

If this goes through, and Donald -- it will make Donald Trump more and more popular. I have no idea how they're going to arrange these things.

It's going to throw everything into chaos. Joe Biden's numbers are going to continue to go down.

And the Democrats have something that the Republicans don't. Thank God.

And that is, the superdelegate. The superdelegate is something that the -- the Democrats came up with, after they saw Ronald Reagan elected.

Here's this guy who was out of step with the party. Was not playing ball with the party. But his grassroots effect just took off. And they couldn't control him.

And the Democrats saw that, and they said, we can't have that happen to our party. We can never have that.

Well, for many, many years, there's never been anybody -- you know, it's like Al Gore or Bill Clinton. Oh, jeez. Which one? Which one?

It's not that big of a choice. They didn't have a Bernie Sanders, that could stand up and actually do grassroots. Well, Bernie Sanders did.

Bernie Sanders was not in their camp. That's why, you saw all of the horse trading and everything else, that was going on, during the 2016 election.

They took him out. Now, that was still not the full superdelegate thing. You're going to see it this year. I really believe the Democrats are going to do their superdelegate, which can vote differently than the public. So it's a -- it's a hand-selected group of people, that the party elites select, and if they feel for the party or for democracy's sake, the people have been duped. They can override their vote. And I think you're going to see the poll numbers going down so horribly, that you're going to have to have somebody else besides Biden. And you can't have his vice president.

And there's no way you can start a campaign now. It's too late. It's too late. You can't even get people on the ballot.

Although, they're strangely trying to get somebody else off the ballot. But you can't even get anybody on the ballot at this point. Superdelegates stand in, and they say, you know what, for the good of the country we need somebody that can unite us all, and that would be Michelle Obama.

STU: Wow. Wow. You're starting off the year with this.

GLENN: Because, I mean -- it just makes sense to me. It may not happen.

But it just makes sense to me. Okay is this to ever

STU: It's amazing.

Because it shows the state of where Biden is, right?

There's a new poll out today, showing that Trump is winning.

GLENN: Clobbering him.

STU: Even with Hispanic voters. And young voters.

GLENN: And black voters.

STU: He's making massive inroads with these people. That are supposed to be just democratic groups.

We talk about them forever. They just take them completely for granted. Right? They show up every single time. They vote 80, 80-70, 80-90 percent for Democrats. And they don't really think about them again.

That is not -- at least in the polls, is changing, in a big way. And at some point, you wonder, are they just going to -- are they really going to go down with the ship. With Joe Biden?

Are they that dedicated to this man?

GLENN: Honestly, what is your choice at this point?

STU: And then you get to where you are with Michelle Obama or someone similar.

GLENN: Right. Am I wrong?

Do they have another choice at this point?

STU: I think Gavin Newsom wants it to be Gavin Newsom.

GLENN: Yeah, but how do you get him on to the ballots everywhere. How does that happen?

STU: It would have to be something within the party. By the way, that's an important thing to understand with the Trump part of this thing as well.

If these states tell the Republicans, they're not going to put him on the ballot. The Republican Party can still make this happen for Donald Trump as the nominee. The question is in the general election where it becomes a problem. They can change all their own rules. They can do all sorts of stuff to make sure that Donald Trump gets this election. If what people believe, is that he's way ahead, and they're just trying to get him off the ballots. It's a different process when it comes to the Republican Party. But when it comes to the actual final ballot, that's a big, big deal.

GLENN: This is Soviet-union stuff. I mean, the next step. Honestly, the next step is to put your opponent in jail.

STU: They would never try that, Glenn.

GLENN: Yeah. They are.

STU: It's fascinating.

GLENN: And it's all under the context of an argument for democracy.

GLENN: Correct.

STU: It's all in this context that the media completely accepts, with no sense of irony at all about it. It's all about an effort to preserve democracy. If you trust democracy, then just beat Donald Trump. Just beat him.

Convince the American people, he's the worst option.

GLENN: They can't.

STU: Your 90-year-old guy who can't get through a sentence will be much better.

GLENN: They can't.

STU: They obviously believe that they can't. Even if they could, they don't believe that they can. Because if you believe actually in democracy, which I don't think that they do. At least the elements of democracy that exist in our constitutional republic. If they actually believed in those things, they would just come out and win.

GLENN: Yes.

STU: I mean, look, I went through a weekend, this weekend, Glenn, where the Philadelphia Eagles lost to the Arizona Cardinals. And the Dallas Cowboys defeated the Detroit Lions, basically blowing up what started as a promising season.

And watching that, the end of that Cowboys game was horrible for Eagles fans.

Because it -- and Detroit Lions fans. It looked like the Lions should have won. There was a controversial call, blah, blah, blah. And people -- my Eagles friends are like, can you believe that call?

Beat the Arizona Cardinals, then you don't have to worry about it. Right? Go out, and win the games on your schedule.

And you don't have to worry about the calls on the other games.

This is what the freaking Democratic Party should be able to understand. Come out and win. Beat the guy you say is Hitler.

And you don't have to worry about throwing him in prison. Just beat him!

GLENN: They're just moving too fast.

Look at. You have a situation now. Did you see the poll numbers with the youth on Osama bin Laden right now?

It is crazy. It is crazy.

It is 26 percent believe that he was not -- not only had good ideas.

But what he did was right. Okay?

It's astonishing. What's happening. Now, why is that happening?

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: Because of lack of education.

We lived through it. And we did not show it, all the time. We don't even teach it anymore.

So all we're teaching is anti-American stuff. They don't know who Osama bin Laden really is. And what do you get? You get this!

Their agenda in schools is working. We've already lost one generation. We may lose two. Okay?

If that happens, and we don't turn it around. America as we know it is gone for a while, on earth.

It will be found again. God will not be thwarted. May not happen in this country. But God will not be thwarted. These freedoms belong to him.

You sit here and you look at what they're doing, they know they can't get all of the things they need passed, passed.

So at the end of progressivism is either a peaceful transition or revolution. They're now choosing, I think, revolution if possible.

If needed. They will not give this up.

But they -- they think they had all of the tools, the thing they didn't count on was the American people.

They didn't count on the middle of the country, actually believing in something, that they don't even understand.

They didn't count on a Donald Trump, or Ron DeSantis. Or Vivek Ramaswamy.

They didn't expect the Tea Party.

And for the people who invented the internet. They had absolutely no idea, the monster, that they unleashed, when they put people and said, you can't talk, on these media outlets.

When the internet was ready. So now, what are they going to do?

They have to effect the election, and they're also trying to take Donald Trump off of the ballot everywhere.

Because they want turmoil in the streets. They have to have it. They have to have it.

TV

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

RADIO

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

RADIO

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

TV

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.