RADIOJanuary 02, 2024

3 RADICAL moves Democrats could make in the 2024 election

2024 is off to a fast start with the beginning of election season only weeks away and Democrats are already playing dirty. Glenn reviews the latest legal challenges against former president Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, including the Maine Secretary of State's attempt to take him off the ballot — even though he hasn't even been CHARGED with insurrection! "This should tell you everything you need to know about the Democrats," Glenn says. But he doesn't believe they'll stop there. Glenn predicts 3 radical moves the Democrats could make as we get closer to November. Will they throw Trump in jail? Will they kick President Biden out of the race? And will they run someone even more radical — Michelle Obama? — in his place?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, welcome, Stu. How are you?

STU: Glenn, very well.

I think you're amazingly accurate here, when you point out, that we're in that situation, where we are hitting the -- the ground running here.

GLENN: Oh, yeah.

STU: We jump in. You come back from holiday break. And you're less than two weeks away from Iowa.

We launch into basically full-out election mode, immediately.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah. Thank you.

STU: We have lots of technical --

GLENN: It's a new year. It is a new year.

STU: New year, new buttons. So you go right into this. I think so many people, you spend the previous year kind of like figuring out what the field looks like. What's this race? What this is? Right. And it's got to be one of the strangest races anyone has ever looked at before. We have one side saying, all they care about is democracy, as they're trying to get the other guy removed from the ballot.

GLENN: I have to tell you. I -- I accidental believe that this is their strategy. First of all, I don't know if you heard about Rudy Giuliani. He's broke now. They've wiped his savings out. He is absolutely broke.

STU: There was a ruling against him for nine figures, right?

GLENN: Yeah. And so he's broke. And that is -- that is the lesson. The lesson is: We'll bankrupt you. We'll destroy you. We'll smear you. You will not survive.

And the process, really is also the punishment. It doesn't matter if they win or not. It really doesn't. They'll just keep going.

With Donald Trump, the way these states -- I mean, I could not believe that they're invoking the 14th Amendment. And saying, well, you know, a part of it insurrection. He's not even been charged with an insurrection. Not even been charged.

So they're taking him off, because of an insurrection.

Something he was never even charged with.

STU: In any -- they have 91 charges against him.

None of them are insurrection.

GLENN: None of them are.

So now you have two states taking him off the ballot.

And there's 30 lining up.

STU: Yeah. Plenty of them are going to try to do it.

GLENN: Let me tell you something: This should tell you everything you need to know, about the Democrats.

It should tell you how radical, they actually are. They're saying that they want to preserve democracy. But this isn't true.

Let me tell you what I think is going to happen.

If this goes through, and Donald -- it will make Donald Trump more and more popular. I have no idea how they're going to arrange these things.

It's going to throw everything into chaos. Joe Biden's numbers are going to continue to go down.

And the Democrats have something that the Republicans don't. Thank God.

And that is, the superdelegate. The superdelegate is something that the -- the Democrats came up with, after they saw Ronald Reagan elected.

Here's this guy who was out of step with the party. Was not playing ball with the party. But his grassroots effect just took off. And they couldn't control him.

And the Democrats saw that, and they said, we can't have that happen to our party. We can never have that.

Well, for many, many years, there's never been anybody -- you know, it's like Al Gore or Bill Clinton. Oh, jeez. Which one? Which one?

It's not that big of a choice. They didn't have a Bernie Sanders, that could stand up and actually do grassroots. Well, Bernie Sanders did.

Bernie Sanders was not in their camp. That's why, you saw all of the horse trading and everything else, that was going on, during the 2016 election.

They took him out. Now, that was still not the full superdelegate thing. You're going to see it this year. I really believe the Democrats are going to do their superdelegate, which can vote differently than the public. So it's a -- it's a hand-selected group of people, that the party elites select, and if they feel for the party or for democracy's sake, the people have been duped. They can override their vote. And I think you're going to see the poll numbers going down so horribly, that you're going to have to have somebody else besides Biden. And you can't have his vice president.

And there's no way you can start a campaign now. It's too late. It's too late. You can't even get people on the ballot.

Although, they're strangely trying to get somebody else off the ballot. But you can't even get anybody on the ballot at this point. Superdelegates stand in, and they say, you know what, for the good of the country we need somebody that can unite us all, and that would be Michelle Obama.

STU: Wow. Wow. You're starting off the year with this.

GLENN: Because, I mean -- it just makes sense to me. It may not happen.

But it just makes sense to me. Okay is this to ever

STU: It's amazing.

Because it shows the state of where Biden is, right?

There's a new poll out today, showing that Trump is winning.

GLENN: Clobbering him.

STU: Even with Hispanic voters. And young voters.

GLENN: And black voters.

STU: He's making massive inroads with these people. That are supposed to be just democratic groups.

We talk about them forever. They just take them completely for granted. Right? They show up every single time. They vote 80, 80-70, 80-90 percent for Democrats. And they don't really think about them again.

That is not -- at least in the polls, is changing, in a big way. And at some point, you wonder, are they just going to -- are they really going to go down with the ship. With Joe Biden?

Are they that dedicated to this man?

GLENN: Honestly, what is your choice at this point?

STU: And then you get to where you are with Michelle Obama or someone similar.

GLENN: Right. Am I wrong?

Do they have another choice at this point?

STU: I think Gavin Newsom wants it to be Gavin Newsom.

GLENN: Yeah, but how do you get him on to the ballots everywhere. How does that happen?

STU: It would have to be something within the party. By the way, that's an important thing to understand with the Trump part of this thing as well.

If these states tell the Republicans, they're not going to put him on the ballot. The Republican Party can still make this happen for Donald Trump as the nominee. The question is in the general election where it becomes a problem. They can change all their own rules. They can do all sorts of stuff to make sure that Donald Trump gets this election. If what people believe, is that he's way ahead, and they're just trying to get him off the ballots. It's a different process when it comes to the Republican Party. But when it comes to the actual final ballot, that's a big, big deal.

GLENN: This is Soviet-union stuff. I mean, the next step. Honestly, the next step is to put your opponent in jail.

STU: They would never try that, Glenn.

GLENN: Yeah. They are.

STU: It's fascinating.

GLENN: And it's all under the context of an argument for democracy.

GLENN: Correct.

STU: It's all in this context that the media completely accepts, with no sense of irony at all about it. It's all about an effort to preserve democracy. If you trust democracy, then just beat Donald Trump. Just beat him.

Convince the American people, he's the worst option.

GLENN: They can't.

STU: Your 90-year-old guy who can't get through a sentence will be much better.

GLENN: They can't.

STU: They obviously believe that they can't. Even if they could, they don't believe that they can. Because if you believe actually in democracy, which I don't think that they do. At least the elements of democracy that exist in our constitutional republic. If they actually believed in those things, they would just come out and win.

GLENN: Yes.

STU: I mean, look, I went through a weekend, this weekend, Glenn, where the Philadelphia Eagles lost to the Arizona Cardinals. And the Dallas Cowboys defeated the Detroit Lions, basically blowing up what started as a promising season.

And watching that, the end of that Cowboys game was horrible for Eagles fans.

Because it -- and Detroit Lions fans. It looked like the Lions should have won. There was a controversial call, blah, blah, blah. And people -- my Eagles friends are like, can you believe that call?

Beat the Arizona Cardinals, then you don't have to worry about it. Right? Go out, and win the games on your schedule.

And you don't have to worry about the calls on the other games.

This is what the freaking Democratic Party should be able to understand. Come out and win. Beat the guy you say is Hitler.

And you don't have to worry about throwing him in prison. Just beat him!

GLENN: They're just moving too fast.

Look at. You have a situation now. Did you see the poll numbers with the youth on Osama bin Laden right now?

It is crazy. It is crazy.

It is 26 percent believe that he was not -- not only had good ideas.

But what he did was right. Okay?

It's astonishing. What's happening. Now, why is that happening?

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: Because of lack of education.

We lived through it. And we did not show it, all the time. We don't even teach it anymore.

So all we're teaching is anti-American stuff. They don't know who Osama bin Laden really is. And what do you get? You get this!

Their agenda in schools is working. We've already lost one generation. We may lose two. Okay?

If that happens, and we don't turn it around. America as we know it is gone for a while, on earth.

It will be found again. God will not be thwarted. May not happen in this country. But God will not be thwarted. These freedoms belong to him.

You sit here and you look at what they're doing, they know they can't get all of the things they need passed, passed.

So at the end of progressivism is either a peaceful transition or revolution. They're now choosing, I think, revolution if possible.

If needed. They will not give this up.

But they -- they think they had all of the tools, the thing they didn't count on was the American people.

They didn't count on the middle of the country, actually believing in something, that they don't even understand.

They didn't count on a Donald Trump, or Ron DeSantis. Or Vivek Ramaswamy.

They didn't expect the Tea Party.

And for the people who invented the internet. They had absolutely no idea, the monster, that they unleashed, when they put people and said, you can't talk, on these media outlets.

When the internet was ready. So now, what are they going to do?

They have to effect the election, and they're also trying to take Donald Trump off of the ballot everywhere.

Because they want turmoil in the streets. They have to have it. They have to have it.

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.