RADIOFebruary 16, 2023

6 stories being LIED ABOUT all to preserve FAR-LEFT POWER

The far-left continues to LIE straight to the American people. In this clip, Glenn reveals 6 recent stories that are being reported with blatant LIES: From the UFOs/balloons, and Jim Biden’s deal with the Saudis, to the Michigan State University tragedy and the Ohio train derailment aftermath. So why ARE they lying so much? Glenn explains it all, PLUS he details one, recent statistic that proves the far-left falsities are beginning to CRUMBLE.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: All right. So, Stu, help me out here.

The Pentagon yesterday -- okay. Now so let's just replay this.

Earlier that week, it's only Wednesday. Earlier this week, they were like, well, we can't rule out little green men.

Can't do it.

Would like to.

Would like to. But I watched Morocco for Morocco.

That was a true story, and we're probably shooting down alien spacecraft, and the aliens did travel probably close to light speed.

Highly advanced society. And they decided to come down and introduce themselves in hot air balloons.

Please!

That was Monday. Yesterday, they said, yeah. We -- we think those balloons are probably -- they were private balloons. Not tied to any spying at all.

Wait. Wait. Wait. What?

These balloons now have nothing to do with China?

They're not -- this is from the Pentagon? No foreign intelligence. What are we shooting down?

Well, they're probably private balloons. And has anybody called and said, hey. That was my balloon?

Did anybody say that?

STU: No. But we definitely should. We should definitely say the Glenn Beck Program put up a balloon. They shut it down. Now they owe us millions of dollars.

GLENN: Okay. So this is how you lose all credibility.

That Chinese balloon, just a weather balloon.

And we just found out about it. No.

You knew about it. Not since it penetrated the airspace in Alaska, like you told us last week. No, no, no.

We now know, you were monitoring it, when it left China.

So not going to give you a pass on that one.

So how many times have they lied to us on this story.

So what is it?

Remember, this story started right after Seymour Hersh said, yeah.

I've got some pretty good evidence, that it was the United States.

This administration, doing a covert op, against the laws of the United States.

And they blew up the pipeline. You should just check that out.

Balloon. Balloon. Balloon. Balloon.

And we're all talking about balloons. Okay.

Now, I would like to believe, that, you know, they actually mean anything that they say. But they don't. They don't.

Why Armstrong you blow up the balloon?

Let's just take that one. Well, because it's not a threat.

Okay. How do you know that?

Well, we just found out about -- no, you didn't.

Well, I mean, we -- we knew about it, you know, in Alaska.

No, you knew about it before.

Okay. Well, yeah.

But it's just a weather balloon.

How do you know that? Chinese told us that.

And you trust them?

CHRIS: Well, I'm not getting a lot of money from them. No, what are you talking about, and we can't shoot it down over the United States.

Because there's no place. There's not 1 inch of land, between Montana and South Carolina, that doesn't have people, riddled all over it.

GLENN: Yeah. There's lots of land.

Well, okay. How many times did they lie just about that one thing?

And the press just reports it. Last night, unfortunately, there was another shooting. This time, at Michigan State University.

Biden came out. This is why we have to have strict gun control, banning assault weapons. We don't even know what kind of gun it was. Maybe it was an assault weapon.

We don't know.

Maybe it was a John Wilkes Booth if one.

We don't know.

But here's something we do know, that the press hasn't really been up to reporting.

The guy who did the shooting, he was arrested for not having a licensed gun. You know, just a little while ago, and the Soros prosecutor decided, I'm not going to do anything about it.

Just release him. Oh.

So wait. You have laws on the book, but you do enforce them.

Okay.

All right.

STU: It's a fascinating part of the story, that like gun laws, the right wants gun laws too. We want more -- we want fewer laws before people commit crimes.

And more laws after they commit crimes. Right?

We want them punished after they commit crimes.

The left wants the opposite. They want more laws, and more punishments, before people it didn't tell crimes. And then almost no punishments after.

Which makes no sense whatsoever.

GLENN: Okay. So why would they do that?

Because it's not about the children.

If it was about the children, you would be pushing for more laws, before. And more laws after and actually going after the Soros people who are letting all these people go. Okay?

But they don't do that. This is not about guns.

This is about our country is -- is likely to collapse, and they need to make sure, they don't have 350 million guns, in the hands of 250 million people.

That's what this is all about. This is all about their power. And let me just make a case.

Well, what was the balloon story about?

I don't think we can tell you, yet.

We don't know. But it certainly wasn't about green aliens.

Even though, that's the step, Biden took on Monday.

He started a UFO commission. Something that Congress did three years ago.

We don't need another commission. We've already got one, well financed.

Why would you do that?

Because you really thought there were little green men that were invading us in hot air balloons?

I mean, there is more of a chance, that that was the wizard returning to the Omaha state fair.

Same reason -- same reason you're not hearing about this today.

Jim Biden negotiated a deal with the Saudis because with of his relationship to Joe Biden. He negotiated 140 million dollar deal.

With the Saudis.

Nobody is talking about that today. Hunter Biden, no. I didn't see anything.

What are you talking about? Of course not. Of course not.

There's what?

In fact, today, I have to get to this in a minute. The Washington Post is excusing people on the Hunter Biden laptop.

They know they have it wrong. All of these stories, they have wrong. All of them. From the beginning. And then they just keep moving the goalposts. Until finally, it's just a sieve.

And it's just leaking everywhere. And everyone knows, well, okay. That's not true.

The FBI agents, see if this is a stunning revelation to you.

FBI agents misused FISA data, to surveil a political party. I wonder which party it was.

It was -- it was a Democrat. Eh.

And here's what they said. Look, the FBI, it gets very complex.

The rules are often, quote, misunderstood.

Those rules for Pfizer, just under- --
it's not really hard.

Do you have evidence and strong suspicion of a crime, being committed with a foreign entity?

If the answer is yes, okay. Show me the evidence that you have, and I'll give you a FISA warrant.

That's it. That's it. That's how complex it is.

FBI also came out, and they said, okay.

All right. We've got -- we had to search a long, long, long time, to find out all of those names that were, you know, John Does, with Jeffrey Epstein.

And it's taken us a long time, and we're still not done with it. But we're going to release it here, probably this year. Probably this year?

What are you talking about, probably this year? They haven't released any of the names. So you know, these are names of people that work with him.

Okay. Had connections. These are not the Johns. These are the people who work with them. These are not the Johns, even though they have the little black book. We have no idea whose name is on that.

Why is that?

Why don't we know the names of the of these very powerful people.

You know, when Bill Clinton gets on to a plane, on the Lolita Express, and goes to Thailand, with Jeffrey Epstein.

I'm thinking maybe, it wasn't for food.

I'm just -- to a like Thai food?

Love Thai food. Let's just hop on the jet and go have some.

Don't think so. But don't know.

And why don't we know?

We found out this week, that one of the hosts on MSNBC, did a critical look at Hillary Clinton when she was running. She's now just come out and said, by the way, I was told, anything about Hillary Clinton had to come -- had to go all the way up to the president of NBC.

To give approval for doing it. Why?

What kind of news organization does that?

The train update. We now know that officials buried the critical health risks, until after the residents return home.

So we knew that it had vinyl chloride.

They were going to burn that up. Everybody should get out of here. It's crazy.

Then all right. It's fine. I'm going to tell you from -- well, I'll be in Columbus.

But I'm going to tell you, that part of Ohio, man, I would lick the grass, it's so healthy there.

Everybody goes back. And then they say, oh, by the way, there was a few more chemicals. One of them was one that was used in World War I, as a -- it was a killing agent.

Don't worry about that. They told them after they went back in.

Why?

Why? Why isn't Pete Buttigieg being pilloried right now.

What is the answer for this? Nobody in town is going to trust the EPA.

No one is going to trust the -- no one is going to trust anybody that says anything about the air quality.

And then what will the media do?

These people, they're just extremists. That's like those people that live near farms. They just don't believe anything.

Yeah. Why?

Because you don't tell us the truth.

Ever. Ever. And then when it finally does come out, that, oh, that's the truth. Here's the Washington Post.

Republicans in the House, are having an investigation in the collusion of the media. The Justice Department and intelligence officials, as they censored the true story of the Biden family corruption, right before 2020 election. So now the Washington Post, it just matter-of-factly says, the true story of the Biden corruption.

Really?

Because you were part of the group of people that would make sure we couldn't say that, without being banned.

Now, Glenn Kessler, the designated fact-checker at WaPo, claiming intelligence officials who lied about Russian disinformation, were very careful in their wording of that letter.

Huh. So now the Washington Post is saying, look, what they said was, it has all the earmarks of Russian disinformation. They never said it was Russian disinformation.

Really?

STU: Now, every one of these media sources took that letter, and turned it into, a straight-out statement.

GLENN: But that's not what these trusted officials were doing.

STU: None of the trusted officials who were on those shows pushed back on it. They didn't say, well, actually. You're going way too far here, by saying it's Russian disinformation. They didn't upon your back on that point.

Of course, everyone knows that. But that's the game we have to play.

GLENN: Well, apparently, it's the game that has to be played. Now, here's the good news. All of this, for the very first time, in modern history, 48 percent -- only 48 percent of American households, have satellite or cable TV.

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: When I was in TV. What was that?

You know, just ten years ago, it was 96 percent of every household had cable or satellite.

It's over. It is over.

And they know it. And now, they are grasping for anything, to keep their head above water.

Warning, when that happens, this is why you always stay on the boat, if someone is drowning. Don't jump in.

They will push even friendlies down to save their own life.

But it's collapsing. Quickly.

This AI could change EVERYTHING by next year

With Elon Musk’s announcement of Grok 4, humanity is closer than ever before to creating AGI – artificial general intelligence – which would change everything. Glenn Beck breaks down what’s coming in the next year with AI, which even Elon Musk called “terrifying.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let me tell you the biggest story of the day.

And I think it is the biggest story possibly of all mankind, as of today.

It's going to change rapidly.

I don't know if anybody -- did either of you guys watch the Elon Musk thing last night?

STU: No, I did watch a few minutes of it.

GLENN: Okay. Did you, Jason?

JASON: No. I sure didn't.

GLENN: Okay. So the xAI team was there to unveil Grok 4. This is the latest intelligence, and let me be very, very clear.

Last night was not your typical tech launch. This is a moment that demands everyone's full attention.

We are now at the crossroads, where promise and peril are going to collide. Okay?

I have explained to you, for years, AGI.
AI. AGI. And ASI. Narrow intelligence is what we've always had.

General intelligence is the next step. And that is, it's better that man, one -- one, you know, like Grok. Can do everything. That you can do.

Better that you can do.

Okay?

And then there's super intelligence. ASI.

Artificial super intelligence.

That's when things get really, really creepy.

When you hit AGI, the road to ASI could be overnight.

Okay?

We need to understand what's at stake here. Because Grok four brought us closer to that second stage, than ever before.

Grok four is a powerhouse. They demonstrated it last night.

It surpasses the expertise of Ph.D.-level sailors in all fields.

It can get 100 percent on any -- any test for any field, mathematics, physics. Engineering.

You name it.

This is not a search engine.

This is a system that tackles problems, so intricate, they -- they go beyond our existing knowledge base.

Okay?

Let's say there is -- let's say, we have a fusion reactor. And the magnetic containment system goes down. I don't even know what I'm talking about at this point.

But it goes down.

And the top minds all on earth are like, I don't know what to do. Grok 4 can step in, model the physics, design new material, stabilize the system, and avert catastrophe. And it can do it about that fast. Now, this is the capability, that Musk says is just around the corner.

Mark my words. You know, how many -- how many years did I say, between 2027 and 2030, we would start to see this?

STU: Oh, a million times.

That was always --

GLENN: For years. Right? Yeah, always the window.

And everybody, even Ray Kurzweil said, oh, that's way too optimistic. We may be 2050.

And then people started going, 2040, 2030.

Grok shows us 2026 or 2027 is when we're going to hit it. This is the last year, that we have, before things get really weird.

Okay?

Last night, Elon Musk is touting this -- this AI.

And all of the solutions.

And then he says.

Hmm. Probably three times.

Something like this.

And I'm quoting. This is one of them.

It's somewhat unnerving to have created intelligence that's greater than our own.

He then goes on to call it terrifying, twice.

Now, this is a man who has launched rockets, you know, into orbit.

Going to Mars.

And he says, twice!

You know, after he sees the results of it. He says, you know, it's really -- in a way, quite terrifying to see what it's doing.

But we just have to make sure that it remains good!

Oh, okay.

All right. Sure.

Now, the key point in the announcement was the mention of ARC-AGI.

I had never heard of ARC-AGI. I had no idea what it was. But I noticed AGI. And I went, uh-oh. That sounds important. So this is the gold standard. The bench mark testing for artificial general intelligence.

Okay.

As I've said before, AGI. Artificial General Intelligence is a machine that matches all human cognition, across all domains.

Reasoning, creativity.

Problem solving. Not just specialized tasks like playing Go or analyzing x-rays. Everything. For instance, Musk said by mid-next year to the latest end of next year, it will be able to create a full length movie, just from a text prompt.
And do it all at once!

So, in other words, it will say, create a movie, and you just explain the Godfather.

It will do the casting. It will do the writing. It will do the filming, if you will. It will -- score the music, and it will happen that fast.

Almost in realtime. We are nowhere near the computational power now, to do that separately.

But this will do it all at once. It will make a movie with all of it, simultaneously.

So the arc AGI system is the benchmark on how close we are to AGI. Remember, scary things happen at AGI.

Terrifying things happen at ASI. ASI could be a matter of hours, or days after we hit AGI.

Grok 4 scored 16.2 percent on the ARC-AGI scale.

Why is that important? You're like, well, only 16 percent away.

Because last time, it barely broke 8 percent.

And that -- they took that test, last time with Grok three.

And it took us forever to get to 8 percent.

Now, what is it? A year later.

We're at 16 percent. Remember, these things are not linear. The next time, we could be at 32, we might be at 64.

We are on the verge. This is the last year of -- I can't believe I'm saying this. Of normalcy. Okay?

This year is -- we're going to look back at this year, probably two years ago, gosh, remember the good old days, when everything was normal.

And you could understand everything.

This is how close we are!

Everything you and I talked about last night, Stu, about what we're doing in January, make -- put -- does it make it even more critical that that happens like, oh, I don't know.

Right now.

STU: Yeah. For sure.

GLENN: You are going to need to know your values, your ethics, your rights.

You are going to need to know absolutely everything.

Now, Grok 4 is not true AGI yet.

It lacks the full autonomy and the generalized reasoning of a human mind. But it is the closest that we've come.

It's a system that can adapt, innovate, at a level that outpaces specialized AIs by a wide margin.

This is a milestone. This is not a destination, but it's something that should jolt everybody awake. So here's what's coming over the next six months. By December 2025, that's this Christmas!

December 2025, he believes, Musk, that Grok 4, will drive breakthroughs in material sciences.

So, in other words, imagine a new -- brand-new alloy, that is lighter than aluminum. Stronger than steel.

And it revolutionizes aerospace and everything else, or a drug that halts Alzheimer's progression, tailored to a person's DNA.

Grok will drive breakthroughs through material science. So brand-new materials that nobody has ever thought of.

Pharmaceuticals that we never thought could be made.

And chemical engineering, putting together chemicals that no man has ever thought.

That's going for happen by December.

Imagine a chemical compound that makes carbon capture, economically viable. The climate change stuff, that's over.

It will be over.

Because this will solve that! These are not fantasies.

This is Grok 4.

Musk said something that he never thought. He believes that within the next year, by 2027, Grok 4 will uncover new physical laws.

So that will rewrite the understanding -- our understanding of the entire universe.

That there will come -- like there's gravity. Hey, you know what, there's another law here that you never thought of. Wait. What?

That, he says, will come by 2027. This is going to accelerate human discovery, at an unprecedented scale.

I told you, at some point. I said, by 2030. It might be a little earlier than that.

Things will be happening at such a fast rate, you won't be able to keep up with them.

And it will accelerate to the point to where you won't even understand what all of this means.

Or what the ramifications are!

Are you there yet?

In six months, Grok 4 could evolve into a system, that dwarfs human expertise in economics, defense, all of it.

Now, again, it's a bit terrifying to quote Elon Musk. Why?

Because we don't know, what else comes with this.

This is like an alien life form.

We have no idea, what to predict. What it will be capable of.

How it will view us, when we are ants, to its intellect.

Okay?

It is a tool, but it is also Pandora's box.

If Grok 4 is the biggest step towards AGI.

And maybe one of the last steps to AGI.

My feeling is: What I've been saying forever.

2027 to 2030, I'm leaning more toward the 2027 now.

Because of this announcement last night.

We are on the verge of AGI.

And everything in human existence changing overnight.

And as Musk said himself, two times, it's terrifying!

We should act like it is terrifying.

Or risk losing the control of the future, that we're all trying to build. That's the biggest story of the day.

I think! In my opinion.

Bill O'Reilly reveals how Trump can END Epstein files nightmare overnight!

Bill O'Reilly joins Glenn Beck with his plan for how the Trump administration can fix the Epstein Files fallout "overnight." Plus, he explains why he believes there's only one way that former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan get indicted by a grand jury.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: All right. Bill O'Reilly.

Welcome to the program, sir! How are you?

BILL: Welcome. (inaudible)

And right off the bat, I have to correct you.

GLENN: Yeah. You're not alive. What know.

BILL: I mean, you know -- you don't know that?

GLENN: Yeah, yeah. No. I -- I thought you were dead. Anyway --

BILL: You were dead to me, oh!
(laughter)
I --

GLENN: I get it.

BILL: That's just another brick in your wall, Beck.
(laughter)

GLENN: It's good to talk to you, Bill.

Tell me -- you had a conversation with -- with President Trump, what, a couple of months ago, and I talked about --

BILL: Yeah. St. Patrick's Day, he invited me to sit on a cabinet meeting, which he does sometimes.

And he said, look, we've got files, Kennedy, King, Epstein -- what do you think? And I said, well, first Kennedy you've got to put out pretty much everything, which he did. King, he didn't. I don't know why. Because that's important too.

And then on Epstein I said, you have to be careful here, because this is now being used in political precincts. Both sides want to destroy anybody that was associated with Epstein. And the problem is that a federal investigation. They don't make a determination whether you had a -- what kind of relationship you had with Epstein. They just said, so-and-so had lunch with him.

Or maybe so-and-so had -- saw him at a party. And I said, any name of a human being associated with Epstein, in any way, that person is going to be destroyed. Because you know, the press is not going to put anything into context.

So I said, but it's very important that the Justice Department tell the folks what they know.

And you don't have to get specific with anything.

But you have to say, this is the information that we've compiled. And that's not hard.

And I don't know why the Trump administration is not doing that.

GLENN: Wow!

So, first of all, it's your fault, that we're not getting any names. We learned a lot here.

BILL: Probably my fault, but the president --

GLENN: You know what, I think you're right. I don't want all the names of the people. I want to know --

BILL: And I don't either.

GLENN: Right! I want to know the Justice Department has sorted through the things, and then have gone through. And said, this is criminal. This is not. These people are being indicted, et cetera, et cetera. But to come out and say, there is nothing there, I mean, it's -- it's at least --

BILL: It's ridiculous.

GLENN: It's mass incompetence, at least from Pam Bondi. How could she come out and say, it's all sitting on my desk?

And then when she doesn't release it, she says, well, that's because the FBI in New York is thwarting this process. There are people up there, that are trying to keep this from me.

And then she makes no arrests on that. We never hear about that again.

And then now all of a sudden, there's nothing to see.

BILL: Well, listen, Pam Bondi does not make decisions on her own.

No cabinet member does.

All the decisions come out of the West Wing.

So what I believed happened was, Trump was so obsessed with the big bill, with Iran, with Putin, with China.

That this -- they didn't even think about this. Okay?

GLENN: I believe that.

BILL: And it slowly began to unravel. And then I caught it by surprise.

But this is the easiest fix. Somewhere so easy.

BILL: So if I'm in charge, and that would be a great thing for everyone, except you, Beck -- but every other American, if I were in charge, tremendous. You would be in Botswana. Right.

GLENN: Right. Oh, I know.

Yeah. Yeah. I would be the ambassador of the white farmers in -- in South Africa if it were up to you. I know. I know.

BILL: No. You would be wandering around going, I am Glenn Beck. And they would go, who? That's what you'd be doing.

GLENN: That's every day.

BILL: So this could happen within the hour. Pam Bondi announces a press conference for tomorrow.

At that press conference, sitting next to her, is Merrick Garland, everyone.

You had this stuff for four years! Now, I understand that Mr. Garland has gone native and is living in a -- well, we can find him. We can pull him out of there, and have him and Pam, sit there and answer questions in a general way about what evidence the Justice Department of the United States has compiled.

GLENN: Not going to happen.

BILL: That's it!

Well, if it's not going to happen, then President Trump is going to take a hit.

But he's calculating that this will say that it's that night important.

But I don't know why you would not do it.

I just don't know. And I'm usually pretty good at predicting what the president does or does not do.

GLENN: So here's the thing, Bill.

I think he keeps focusing on Epstein. It's not that big of a deal.

It's not about Epstein. It's about justice.

It's about, can we trust the people -- correct!

It's all about credibility and justice.

And he's not seeing that. And I don't know how he's missing that. Because I agree with you.

He's been so busy on so many other things.

BILL: That's right. That's right.

GLENN: This is not at the top of his priority list.

But he did campaign on it.

BILL: Right.

And I don't know if there's anybody inside the White House.

He looks to be annoyed, when this subject comes up.

GLENN: Oh, I know.

BILL: And here's the -- what works -- you have to understand.

A guy like Donald Trump runs it all.

If he's annoyed, nobody will want to annoy him more. Okay?

GLENN: Oh, I know.

BILL: That's how it works. The older arch is, because Epstein got favorable treatment.

By the feds, in the first go around in Florida, that there's a deep suspicion about this case.

But if you break it down, if the Biden administration had any dirt on any Republican associated with Epstein. It would have been out.

And vice-versa.

If the Republicans had any dirt on any Democrats. Now, we know that former president Clinton, was involved with Epstein to some extent.

I don't know if that was a factor, okay? I don't know.

But your right for once. You're right. It's about credibility. It's about the American people trusting that we do have equal justice for all!

So what do you -- what do you make of now the Russia gate thing, coming out, today. Or yesterday.

The FISA court.

The fact that they're now saying, hey.

You know, we need to hold Brennan accountable.

We're like five or six days away.

Weeks away from him, you know, slipping past the -- the statute of limitations.

I mean, all these things are out today.

There's that. There is also the -- let's see here.

The Secret Service -- I think this happened a year ago.

But it's being reported as if it's news.

Secret Service suspends six agents assigned to protect Trump during a Butler assassination attempt. I mean, all these things are coming out. Like, look, we're busy on all these things. And I do believe they're busy on these things.

But it's like the Keystone Cops are in charge of the PR on this. It's bad.

BILL: Well, there's a lot of politics involved in both of those cases. Number one, in order to get Comey and Brennan to get indicted by a grand jury. Federal grand jury, and that's the only passage, you would have to have a whistle-blower, saying, yeah, these guys abused their power. I worked for them. And they absolutely wanted to get Trump.

And they knew the Russia dossier was phony.

And they did it anyway.

If I have that Justice Department.

Then you can get those guys.

If you don't have it, they will not be even indicted by a grand jury.

GLENN: So how is it that we do not have that Justice Department?

How do we not have that Justice Department?

BILL: Well, look. I don't know whether they have a whistle-blower or not, okay?

And if they have a whistle-blower, I want the case to go forward.

I want those two men indicted.

You can't do that, at that level.

As far as the Secret Service is concerned, monumental screw up. Everybody knows it. They fired the morons in charge of it. That woman -- I was embarrassed listening to her, trying to explain.

They didn't know what the deuce was going on. But this was across-the-board, in the Biden administration.

You know, it was a year ago Sunday, this upcoming Sunday.

GLENN: Right.

BILL: And it's just another example of how the Biden administration was the second worst administration in the history of this country. People have no idea how bad it was.

Every single agency was chaotic. Nothing worked. And this is just part of that. And we'll have a slew of stuff on Sunday. Nothing really meaningful.

I mean, they suspended the Secret Service agents, as they should have. They fired the director as they should have. The guy was a nut.

I don't know if there was anything more to that. I doubt it.

I'm more interested in the guy in the bushes. Because they don't know anything about him. I would like to know a little bit about him.

But again, the federal government, it doesn't really matter. It's the government. They never want to tell us stuff, Beck, never.

We always have to pull it out of them. It's almost like Russia or something. Come on!

GLENN: Right. Yeah. Let me ask you, let me take you back again to the Epstein thing.

I noticed yesterday, there were these people who were on the left. Who were taking tweets of mine. That say, look. These things don't make sense. On the Epstein thing. And they just have to be answered. And not anti-Trump at all.

And yet, the anti-Trump people were retweeting that, and they're trying to -- they're trying to get the right to fight against itself again and split people away from Donald Trump, where I don't think this Epstein thing is -- is splitting people from Donald Trump, at least at this point.

And I -- you know, I -- my wife stopped me from answering some of those tweets, yesterday.

Because it's never good, when you -- when I tweet in anger. Which I did.

But -- or was going to. What did you think about how this is being used against the right to try to separate us even more?

BILL: Everything is political. Everybody knows that for you.

But the MAGA people, from the mail I get. And I get a voluminous amount of mail. They're not happy.

GLENN: Oh, I agree. I'm not happy.

BILL: Now, are they going to throw President Trump under the cliché-ridden bus? No. Because to them, the greater good is being served by a fair tax bill.

Trying to cut waste.

Dealing with Iran effectively. And hopefully dealing with Putin.

That's another thing, that's on Trump's plate.

He has to deal with Putin now.

Has to. And that will be the next big story.

GLENN: How is he going to deal with it?

BILL: Lavrov and Rubio, are in Indonesia, as we speak.

And I assume that Rubio is delivering a message. That you either stop, or we're going to just absolutely crush you economically. Which the United States can do. By saying. No bank does business with Moscow.

And if you do business, no matter what bank you are, we're going to put you out of business.

Okay?

GLENN: Yeah. I've only got a couple of seconds. But didn't we already do that under Biden?

BILL: No! We didn't do the banks. We did the sanctions. And the sanctions they can always get around, because China is going to buy as much oil from Russia as possible.

You stop the banks, from doing all business with Moscow? Who is going --

GLENN: Isn't that what the SWIFT thing was all about?

When we kicked them off of SWIFT, wasn't that what that was all about?

BILL: No! Because they can still do a huge business with countries buying their oil.

And they got to pay Putin and Russia for the oil, and that has to go through the banking system.

If you stop the banking system, he can't get paid.

GLENN: Hmm, it's amazing. I'm glad I'm not the president right now. I think he's made some very brave decisions, and he is walking a tightrope. I mean, the world is on edge. And I pray for --

BILL: He looks very tired to me. Very tired. I haven't talked to him in a while, which is unusual. But you're right. You're absolutely right. That's the second time you've been right in this conversation. My God!

GLENN: I know. It's crazy.

BILL: What in the world.

GLENN: I was wrong about you being dead.

BILL: What is happening?

GLENN: It's good -- it's good to talk to you, my friend. Is everything okay? Is everything going well?

BILL: Everything is all right, Beck. We are not only successful, but that's old news. We've been that way for 50 years, but I appreciate you having me on your fine program.

GLENN: Okay. I love you.

BILL: Stu is still breathing.

GLENN: Hmm.

BILL: So that's good. Right.

But I've got a big book called Confronting Evil. Of course, we sent it, and of course you denied getting it. That comes out September 9th, so put me on a dance card.

GLENN: Well, we'll have you on. And you can also find Bill and his YouTube page. YouTube.com/BillOReilly. Or is it The Walking Dead?
(laughter)
He's not even laughing. Maybe he hung up. Bill O'Reilly, great to have him on.

FLASHBACK: Kash Patel says FBI Director has Epstein's "Black Book!"

During a 2023 interview with Glenn Beck, now-FBI Director Kash Patel adamantly proclaims that the FBI and specifically the FBI Director is in direct control of Jeffrey Epstein's "Black Book" of clients. So now given the most recent claims by Patel and DOJ Attorney General Pam Bondi, what has changed from his perspective since taking this role? What do YOU think is the explanation for this change in tune by Kash Patel?

Watch Glenn Beck's Extended Interview with Kash Patel from 2023 HERE

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Are Epstein's "Blackmail Videos" Being Used for Leverage RIGHT NOW?

What was Jeffrey Epstein's operation all about. If he was at the center of a massive blackmail operation to compromise those in positions of power, who is in possession of that information now? Glenn Beck and ATF Whistleblower John Dodson analyze the details of this situation and give their thoughts on what is the most likely reality surrounding Epstein.

Watch Glenn Beck's FULL Interview with ATF Whistleblower John Dodson HERE