RADIO

Are Biden's LIE-FILLED speeches a JOKE or a disturbing sign?

Glenn is convinced President Biden thinks he's on Fantasy Island ... either that, or he has no idea what he's talking about. In speeches on Tuesday, Biden told lie after lie and made gaffe after gaffe — lies about the economy, the deficit, insulin, and even his own son. And Glenn has one question: THIS is the guy who's running the country? But it's not just Biden. Glenn reviews a new report from Revolver News about some strange things going on at the FBI ...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Yesterday, it was the weirdest thing. I swear to you, we're in fantasy island. We're on fantasy island. These people don't know what they're talking about. Yesterday, he was stumping -- the president was stumping for Charlie Crist. And, again, he said, and I quote, inflation is a worldwide problem right now, because of the war in Iraq. Excuse me, the war in Ukraine.

I'm thinking of Iraq, because it's where my son died. Your son died in Bethesda. That's in Maryland. Your son didn't die in Iraq. Your son died in cancer, in Bethesda.

I -- I mean, that is the craziest thing -- he really, I think, believes this.

STU: What the hell is going on with this? This is the second time he's done this over the last couple of weeks.

GLENN: Yeah. Last couple of weeks. He's done this maybe 15 times. You didn't notice that? He says it all the time.

STU: What is going on?

GLENN: I don't know.

STU: Because, I mean, look, maybe -- you make the mistake one time. I can't think of how that would -- maybe it would be, okay. Well, that's where my son served. And he said, died. And, again, I feel like with your son. The type of thing, you're pretty crystal clear on. But to make this mistake, over and over and over again. How can anyone deny this man is lost?

GLENN: I don't know.

How about this one? Is this a lie, or does he actually know? Cut three.

VOICE: Let me say something. I want to point something out. On big spending Democrats. You and I spend a lot of money on these things. But guess what, I cut the deficit in half.

GLENN: Oh, stop. Stop it.

STU: Liar.

GLENN: This year alone, 1 trillion $400 reduction.

GLENN: I mean --

STU: One trillion $400, Glenn. Wow.

GLENN: $400. That $400 --

STU: So he has it down that specifically. He cut it down by a trillion, and there was also a 400-dollar cut he got through.

GLENN: Yeah. Can we play Fantasy Island music again, just for this one? Because this is crazy. Listen to this. Cut five.

BIDEN: The economy is, in fact, growing. In fact, the economy grew 2.6 percent last quarter. And although it may not feel that way, people's incomes went up the last quarter more than inflation.

GLENN: No. No, they didn't.

BIDEN: Economic growth is up. Price of inflation is down. Real incomes are up. The grass prices are down.

GLENN: No, they're not. No, they're not! No, they're not.

STU: Incredible.

GLENN: I don't -- I just don't get it. By the way, explaining inflation. He said, it's the lowest in the world. Even the World Economic Forum says, it's not true.

And then he came up with his own definition of inflation. I mean, I don't know. Then he said, how many of you know somebody with diabetes, that needs insulin?

Do you know how much it costs to make the insulin drug for diabetes?

Well, it was the man -- a man who didn't patent it, because he wanted it available for everyone. I spoke to him, okay.

When he claimed to have met the man who invented insulin last night. He couldn't have. He was born in 1942. And the guy died in 1941!

So unless the insulin guy was on his mom's belly, going, hey. Insulin. What are you talking about?

Oh, my gosh. He then introduced Debbie Wasserman Schultz, as I don't have a greater friend in the United States Senate. She's not a senator. She's not a senator, she's a congressperson. Then he said he went to Delaware state university. No, he didn't. That's a black college. Biden, not black. Oh, by the way, he went to the university of Delaware, not Delaware state university. I mean, the guy -- this is the guy who is in the situation room. This is the guy who is answering. Hello, when the phone rings.

It's terrifying. Terrifying. But not quite as terrifying -- by the way, we're live streaming on YouTube every day. We're just trying it out. I -- I have by the end of the week, Stu, have you placed your bet on how long we last on YouTube live streaming.

STU: I've already lost. This is day two, so I've already lost.

GLENN: Right. Okay. We have tried. Anyway, we're live streaming. If you want to watch the Blaze. You want to watch the radio show. Join us at Glenn Beck YouTube.com/GlennBeck.

Okay.

STU: Can I just chime in on one of these points you made here just a second ago? This is just in, Brian Riedle just released his big budget book that he does every year.

In just 20 months, President Biden added, added $4.8 trillion, to ten-year deficits. He's bragging about bringing them down. He's added $4.8 trillion to them, in just 20 months.

GLENN: No. He cut it. He cut it.

STU: No. He didn't. He didn't cut it.

GLENN: The plague. The plague.

STU: Oh, excuse me. He's fulfilling this fantasy.

GLENN: The fantasy. All right. A confused friend told the Daily Mail, I sent a text to him, and asked him if he was okay. He wasn't able to talk about what was about to go, on the advice of his lawyer. But he's okay.

The Daily Mail has found the reporter that we had been looking for. The Emmy winner, investigative reporter, James Horton Meeks.

No longer missing, he was spotted at his elderly mother's townhouse.

Although, when approached, he went dark and wouldn't talk about anything. So he's been found. That's good.

But can we find out what happened with the FBI? Probably not, because they have bigger fish to fry.

This is in now from revolver news.

Revolver news. And I want to read this to you, exactly. Because this is -- this is outrageous.

More than a year has passed since the FBI released footage of the pipe bomber who allegedly planted explosive devices near the DNC and RNC headquarters, the night before January 6th.

Okay. The FBI has reportedly collected 39,000 video files, relating to the suspect's identity.

39 thousand this is according to the assistant director in charge of the FBI's DC field office. Yet, since September 8th, 2021, not a single new video file has been released.

We have at Revolver been focused on two clips of video footage from the DNC building security cameras, that the FBI released on March 20, 2021. And September 20, 2020, you. In August 20, 2022. The Revolver proved that the DNC camera footage from the September 20, 2021 release, should have captured the money shot.

That's the shot of the pipe bomber, taking the bomb out of the bag, and placing it near the park bench, in front of the DNC building.

But for some reason, the FBI censored the tape, so the public could not see the alleged criminal walk back into the camera frame, and commit the actual criminal act.

Over the past two months. Revolver has taken a closer look, at the DNC surveillance footage, that the FBI provided for the public.

What we found is even more bizarre, and more damming than our initial discovery, that the FBI is withholding critical footage of the pipe bomber, actually planting the bomb. The original missing money shot.

Reflecting the FBI's deliberate censorship of the commission of a crime is effectively a red flag, of such stunning proportions that it alone merits congressional investigation, under a G.O.P.-led house commission on FBI malfeasance. The new findings, that we are about to discuss, however, are so implausible, so specific, and so suspicious, that we are compelled to demand that a future G.O.P.-led commission subpoena and demand the exact chain of custody for the DNC surveillance tapes, that the FBI has released to the public.

You have to understand, in this article, first, something called frame rate. Pictures, video, film. They are individual pictures. And they're taken at a frame rate. Television is, I think, what is it? Twenty-five frames per second.

Film used to be like 60 frames per second. I'm butchering these. But I'm in the neighborhood. And now, high-tech is around, I think, 120 frames per second. That means there's 120 frames taken per second, and they're all in line. When we went to the moon, what they sent back, when you had that really fuzzy picture, and the guys were kind of on the moon. And they were jumpy. And they were like, the Eagle has landed. That was eight frames per second. So in 1969, the picture you saw from space, was eight seconds, per frame.

Okay. The -- the footage provided by the FBI, the -- the frame rate is so low, that it is not even possible.

It is barely -- it barely exceeds one frame per second. So we are asked to believe, that the -- the security cameras, that are out now, are typically 30 frames per second, and higher.

Dinosaur cameras. Decades old. Again, the moon shot. Eight frames per second.

And it used to be that you would have low quality eight frames per second, because you didn't have the storage capacity. Okay. So you couldn't store all of that.

You don't see surveillance cameras operating at one frame per second. In fact, modern day, it's 120 frames per second. They record all day, storage is not a problem. Okay?

You don't get any kind of savings anymore. You don't have the problem -- you would have to spend more money, to get somebody to make a one frame per second camera.

STU: Yeah. Because you could buy Nest cameras that give you good video quality, for like $100 a piece. Now, I did read that these cameras were installed some time ago. I think eight years ago, is what I read. Still, even eight years ago. It's not one frame per second.

GLENN: No. Not one frame per second. That you have to go back decades, to get one frame per second.

Comprehensive 2021 study on surveillance footage frame rates found that 0 percent. Zero percent of surveillance cameras had a frame rate below five frames per second. You have to buy your camera from an old, rundown, McDonald's, that might have been closed for the last 20 years, to get that kind of a frame rate, okay?

So why does the security footage, from the FBI released from the DNC, the national headquarters, depict the alleged pipe bomber -- why is it only one frame per second?

Why?

What happened? This is the national headquarters of the democratic party. The vice president elect herself was going in, all the time. They have posted someone outside, all day long. Right at that bench.

This is like the Seth Rich area where he died. Okay?

Why would you not have good cameras. Of course, you would. This is -- this is the same office, that in 1972, they broke into.

Okay? This is a crime ridden area, bad.

Washington, DC, important building. One frame per second. Not possible. Not possible.

Okay. So what does this mean? This means that most likely, either the DNC, or the FBI cut out all of the important pictures.

They would cut out -- I mean, if you wanted to go back in the old-timey days to the moon shot, they cut out seven frames per second. You didn't see anything.

Because he was here. And then he was off screen.

And then he was back. And then he was all the way on the other side of the screen.

You didn't have the --

STU: You get the motion.

GLENN: You didn't get the 14 seconds in between.

So what happened?

TV

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

RADIO

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

RADIO

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

TV

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.