RADIO

Democrat Admits They Will OVERTURN The Election If Trump Wins?!

A clip has surfaced of Democratic congressman Jamie Raskin saying that if Trump wins the 2024 election, it will be up to Democrats to "disqualify him" on January 6, 2025 ... and that doing so could "lead to something akin to civil war." Glenn breaks down why this 14th Amendment, Section 3 argument is dangerous and wrong: "So, they will overturn the vote," although Trump was never tried, convicted, or even charged with insurrection. How is that "democracy?" But then again, this is the same party and media that OVERNIGHT went from criticizing Kamala Harris' inability to keep staffers to calling her the greatest leader we've ever seen ...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, I want to play something that I -- I hope, it is my honest prayer. That every day, I can reach somebody.

And they don't to agree with me in the end.

But reach somebody that hasn't done their homework. Who has just listened to the media. And has bought into all of this stuff.

But they're starting to go, you know, something doesn't seem right. Every day, I just hope that one person in this audience wakes up.

Because it's not just about the country. It's honestly about our souls.

We are so easily led astray on this. Now, I want to play something from Jamie Raskin. Now, Jamie Raskin is the guy who was in charge of the impeachment of Donald Trump.

He is -- you know, in my opinion, he's not the -- he's not the best of guys.

But, I just want you to hear what he was saying. Now, this is a couple of months ago, at a conversation at a bookstore in Washington, DC. The book is politics in prose.

And here's Jamie Raskin talking to the public, on what is coming if Donald Trump is elected.

Now, listen to this. Cut four.

VOICE: Last night, I was most worried. About the Supreme Court's perspective, imminent abdication of its very clear duty to disqualify Donald Trump from the ballot, under Section three of the 14th amendment.

And what that might mean, if their decision says that it's really up to Congress, on January 5th.

Or January 6th. 2025.

To disqualify him at the counting of the electoral college votes.

Which could really lead to something. Civil War. If that's what the suggestion is. Which is what I think I heard. When I went to the oral argument. That they themselves are unwilling to rule whether or not, the Colorado Supreme Court is correct in finding that he had engaged in insurrection on January 6th, 2021. So -- but that was just last night's worry.

GLENN: Okay. I want you to understand what he is saying.

The 14th Amendment, Section three is -- was written about the Civil War. And it was, if you were -- you know, if you were Jefferson Davis, who was a congressman or a senator. I can't remember.

And he was the head of the Confederacy. Because he was the president of the Confederacy, he engaged in insurrection. And so he could not then become president of the United States. Anyone who was engaged in insurrection, could not be president of the United States.

Well, that was very, very clear, back then, who was part of the insurrection, and who was not part of the insurrection.

It was a Civil War. Donald Trump has never been -- he's been accused of all kinds of stuff. And he has been accused of engaging in an insurrection.

But he has never been charged with that. Out of all of the charges, that they have laid against this guy, they've never charged him with insurrection.

Okay? Which means, because he's never been charged, he's never stood trial.

He didn't get a chance to make the case, no.

That wasn't insurrection. I wasn't involved in an insurrection.

So he hasn't been charged. He hasn't been tried. Nor has he been convicted of that.

But Raskin just believes that he was involved in an insurrection. And doesn't even think they need to make the legal case. He thinks the Supreme Court just should have said. No. It was insurrection.

Okay. So what he's saying here is: If he is elected, we're going to charge him with insurrection. Under the 14th amendment. Section three. And disqualify him, before he is officially sworn in, as president of the United States.

So they will overturn the -- the vote. He is so serious, about this. Now, remember, this is the way these people have been working.

They have -- they just say it, and because they have the media, it just becomes that. Okay?

Donald Trump was in cahoots with the Russians, to overturn the election, in '16. None of that is true.

Donald Trump had a bank account, that was being pinged by the you Russians.

None of that was true. But it suddenly became true.

The same thing with Hunter Biden.

His laptop isn't real.

That was true for a long time, for a lot of people.

Even though the government and people like Jamie Raskin knew it wasn't true.

Take Biden. He's not senile.

They met with him.

They knew he was fading. But they needed him to be the guy.

Until he proved in a debate, he couldn't be the guy.

He loses the debate, and all of a sudden, he is senile. And he has to go right now.

Because, why?

He can't handle being president?

Then why didn't you invoke the 25th Amendment.

Why didn't you do it the right way?

Why didn't you have a coup? But it wasn't a coup, it was a democratic process. No, it wasn't. Not constitutional.

He resigned. Sure. But how did that come about?

That was a coup. Then they just replaced.

Now, remember, Harris was -- she was incompetent. She was a joke.

Everybody in the media knew that. Everybody said that. In fact, the stories were, just a week before: She can't keep her staff. She is so hated, she's a monster in the office. And a week later, after hearing that for three years. A week later, the new reality is that it's Camelot. Like Camelot. That she's going to bring back the JFK years.

Because she's so beloved. And smart. And so unifying. So when they say things, they just expect everyone to believe it.

And the sad thing is, about 30 percent of the population believes it. Inflation is transitory. It's not real.

It is real.

And now it is real. But it was Donald Trump's fault, somehow or another.

Now, the consequences of this, is significant.

And Jamie Raskin knows it. Listen to cut five.

VOICE: What can be put into the Constitution can slip away from you very quickly.

And the greatest example going on right now, before our very eyes is section three of the Fourteenth Amendment, which they're disappearing with a magic wand, as if it doesn't exist.

GLENN: Stop. Stop. They're disappearing this, as if it's a magic wand.

How -- how is the -- how is the right making something in the Constitution, disappear?
We're not disappearing it. We're saying, charge him. Try him.

You don't. Because you cannot win that case. You don't have any evidence, of that case.
It was easy under Jefferson Davis.

And believe me, if Donald Trump was trying to overthrow the -- the country and the Constitution, I would be standing with Jamie Raskin. Not near him.

I don't know -- I don't want to catch whatever it is he's got.

It's sanity. But I would not stand for any president, either side, trying to overthrow the Constitution of the United States.

And I don't think you would either.

But they haven't made that case.

They just could you see. So what happens?

He says, we're making that just disappear. So you have to fight for the Constitution. And here's what he says will happen.

VOICE: Disappearing with a magic wand. As if it doesn't exist. Even though it can't be clearer what it's stating.

They want to kick it to Congress. It will be up to us, January 6th, 2025. To tell the rampaging Trump mobs, that he's disqualified. Then we need bodyguards for everybody. In Civil War conditions. All because the nine justices. Not all of them.

But these justices, who have not many cases to look at, this year.

Not much work to do. A huge staff.

Great protection. Simply do not want to do their job.

And interpret what the great 14th amendment means.

GLENN: It is -- it is -- listen to what they're saying.

On one hand, because nine people made the choice that it is not a federal issue, on abortion.

They haven't done their job. And they're out of control. And what the Supreme Court was saying, is it has to be up to the people. And the states.

Not the court. Not nine people, making that decision.

They do the same thing on, what does the 14th Amendment mean?

Well, you've got to kind of charge the guy.

But, you know, this is all about Congress. So Congress has to make it.

They don't want that responsibility. They want the nine guys in the robes. To blame.

And so they -- they mock and say, the Supreme Court is lazy. And they just don't -- they don't have much to do.

And they just don't want to do this. And so we're going to have to have bodyguards. And Civil War companies.

And I hate to say it. But Jamie Raskin is right.

If they do that, it will be a Civil War.

You cannot unseat -- I mean, look at what they're saying. We're going to do exactly what we've accused Donald Trump of doing. On January 6th. Overthrowing the system.

And somehow or another, they'll be heroes.

This time.

America, you have a serious, serious choice.

And some deep thinking is required, now.

RADIO

This Russian nuke warning is HORRIFIC… for an UNEXPECTED reason

Glenn Beck reviews a video of Aleksandr Dugin, known as “Putin’s brain,” warning that nuclear war is inevitable. But this warning from Russia is absolutely terrifying for another reason: it’s NOT REAL …

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Operation Fast and Furious: The TRUE Story of How the Feds were Running Guns into Mexico

The Border Crisis has been ongoing for years, and one of the biggest scandals was the ATF “gunwalking” scandal known as Operation Fast and Furious which occurred during when Barack Obama was President. Glenn Beck talks with John Dodson, the whistleblower who revealed the scandal to get the facts about what happened and why it was a flawed operation from its inception.
Watch the FULL Interview HERE

VIDEOS

Glenn Beck & Piers Morgan REACT to Trump's Iran Strike & What Comes Next

Glenn Beck joins Piers Morgan to react to President Trump's decision to strike Iran's Nuclear Facilities and what could come next with the conflict. Is this just the start of a larger conflict involving Iran, Israel and the United States, or will this move by Trump put at least a temporary end to the brewing tensions?

RADIO

Meet the pro-Intifada candidate NYC Democrats just elected

New York City Democrats just elected 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani, a "socialist Muslim", as the Party's candidate for mayor. But Glenn Beck argues that his radical beliefs are actually communist and Islamist.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

VOICE: Z10852. Something weird is going on. The World Trade Center is on fire.

VOICE: Seriously the top of the building. We're trying to get information.

VOICE: Top level of one of the --

VOICE: To unfold from New York City.

VOICE: A plane crashed just --

VOICE: My sister is in that believe. I hope she's okay. I have to come to New York.

VOICE: It's pandemonium.

VOICE: It's raining papers.

VOICE: Wait a minute! Stop just a second. Why are we -- why are we -- I've got breaking news. Breaking news, yesterday. New York City just elected as their mayoral candidate for the left. And the Democrats, a -- a Muslim radical, who is also a communist!

So, you know, it only took you 25 years. It only took you 25 years, New York, to go completely insane.

Somebody who is -- well, I mean, if I might quote Michael malice today. I am old enough to remember when New Yorkers endured 9/11 instead of voting for it.

But you've got a -- you've got a communist jihadist apologist now.

Who was -- you know, well, CAIR put $100,000 behind his bid for New York City mayor.

So you have somebody who is endorsed by CAIR. That's really good.

He also was somebody who said, you know, he was -- he was for the shooting of the United Health Care CEO.

Said he was looking forward to driving down magnum Joan avenue. I don't know. Sounds like supporting people in the streets. Maybe it's just me.

Then he also said that he was going to globalize the intifada, which I think that's -- maybe -- maybe that's just me.

I mean, what do I know?

Tim Miller who is a podcaster. Asked him a few weeks ago. Asked him about his pro Palestinian slogan. Globalized the intifada. And he said, for me, ultimately, what I hear in so many, is a desperate desire for equality and equal rights, in standing up for Palistinian human rights. Oh, is that what you hear, Mr. CAIR?

Really? Huh, that's interesting.

Right. So globalize the intifada.

I mean, I mean, sure, that's -- I mean well, let me go on.

Because I don't want to take him out of context.

He then delved into the semantics of the intifada, citing the United States Holocaust memorial museum's use of a word for a translation for uprising, in an Arabic version of an article, a museum published about the Warsaw ghetto.

Oh!

So this is just a comparison, about the -- the armed rebellion against the Nazis!

I don't know if that makes me feel better!

I mean, if we're globalizing that.

We're the Nazis in this scenario.

Because I don't think it's the Palestinians.

I certainly don't think it's anybody who is like, hey.

Global jihad. I don't think it's those guys.

Or the Nazis. Who are the Nazis in that?

And it seems, if that's what you mean, then it's not just a harmless kind of slogan about human rights. It is a call for violence on the streets.

Because I don't know if you know, that's what happened when the Jews had their uprising against the Nazis.

I'm just saying!

But, hey, hey, free Palestine.

Oh, that's not what that means, gang. That is not what that means, but don't worry about it. He's just going to be possibly the new mayor.

And that's great. By the way, the Columbia faculty members signed a letter defending Hamas.

They were also among the donors to his mayoral campaign.

So, you know, you don't have anything to worry about.

And his father, who used to work at Columbia. Do you know, Stu?

Is his Dad -- is he still a professor at Columbia University?

He said that -- this violent terror thing of Islam, is not a part of Islam. Now, I've read the Koran, and much of the hadith.

And I'm pretty sure the violence is a part of that. But no.

No. This is something entirely new.

And his father while at Columbia university, wanted everybody to know, that this is actually -- this is something that came out of America!

America is really responsible for this.

And, you know, it really started with the Reagan administration, you know, when he started -- when he started with his very religious terms, to finish the war against the evil empire.

So, you know, that's where -- that's where 9/11 came from.

Is what -- don't worry about it! Don't worry about it!

Because who am I? I'm clearly just -- am I an anti-Semite today, or am I an Islamophobic? I can't remember which one.

Oh, it's probably both. Anyway, Islamophobia. Let me just explain Islamophobia. I haven't even gotten to the Communist part of it. Which is really, really -- New York, you're in one for hell of a ride. Buckle up.

It will be a fun rollercoaster for you. My gosh, I've never been happier that I've been away are if New York.

Anyway, I just want I to know, there is Islam. And then there is Islamists. Now, an Islamist is somebody who really wants Sharia law.

That's political Islam!

That's not a faith. That's political Islam.

Now, let me make really -- something really clear. Criticizing Islamism, is not Islamophobia. Pointing out the dangers of, oh. I don't know.

Political Islam. The ideology that seeks to use the tools of democracy, ultimately to destroy democracy, is not an attack on Muslims.

No. Uh-uh.

You know why?

Because Muslims are often the first people in line.

The first victims of the ideology.

So let's draw a bright, bright line between Islam as a faith, millions of people can practice that faithfully and peacefully.

It's mostly peaceful, okay?

Then there's the Islamism.

Islamism is something entirely -- that's a political project.

A theocratic political -- oh. Left loves theocracies. They love it.

Of course, you never see a problem with it.

See it when an Islamist is touting it. Anyway, it's not about prayer. It's not about fasting. It's not about spiritual life.

It's all about power. It's about merging of mosque and state. It's about implementing Sharia, not as a personal code of conduct. But as a governing legal system.

And it's -- it's supremacy.

Absolutely. Faith.

Religion.

It's -- there's one thing that's supreme.

It's misogynistic.

Deeply intolerant of all kinds of things.

Descent. Secularism. Other faiths. Even competing interpretations from inside the faith itself.

It will behead them too.

So let's -- let's be honest here for a second.

You know, CAIR should be labeled an international terror organization.

In my opinion. In my opinion.

Oh, does that make me -- that makes me an Islamophobe. I'm sure. I'm sure they will start a campaign against me on being an Islamophobe.

Stand in line, guys. You've been doing it since 2001, okay?

I don't really care. And I don't think the American people. I think that record, all the grooves are worn-out on that one, okay?

This is not a religion we're talking about. When we're talking about Sharia law. And we're talking about globalize the intifada. What does that mean, actually, to globalize it?

Does that mean we now want to do what is happening to Israel? All over the world?

Has the Palestinian plight become our plight you now, as Americans?

That there has to be an intifada here!

Because it's the kind of the same. You know. It's kind of the same over, you know, with what the Palestinians are going through.

Well, it's very much like what the Jews went through with the Nazis.

That's a weird one. That one makes my head hurt. It's very much the same as that. And very much the same as the fight against Donald Trump.

Oh, this is going to be fun. It's fun!

Really fun. You know, the irony here is, the ones that will scream Islamophobia the most, are the ones in the progressive left, the champions of feminism, LGBTQ rights. And secularism.

They're going to -- no. You want -- they're going to stand with the people, who want to kill them first.

See, this is how smart they are!

This is why it's going to work out well, in New York City.

Let me just say. If you have an ounce of common sense, you run a business, you have an ounce of wealth. And I don't mean wealth like, you know, hey, Lovey.

Let's get on the boat for a three-hour tour with a suitcase full of cash. I mean you saved anything, anything, get the hell out of New York City.

I mean, this is about survival. This is about free speech. This is about women's rights.
Religious pluralism. Secular legal systems. Liberal democracy.

But it's also about failed principles of Communism. Okay?

First, you have to call out political Islam for what it is. Okay?

And we have to do it with the clarity that we call out white nationalism.

Got to do it with that. Got to -- you know, the Klan. Really bad people.

Really bad people.

Anybody who is shouting for globalized intifada?

Pretty bad. Pretty bad people.

Okay?

Now, let's get to communism.

Because that's another cool, cool angle of the new Democratic candidate for -- for mayor of New York City.

That I just -- I think is cuddly and cute. Sure, it led to 100 million deaths. But this time, New York is going to be radically different. Oh, did I use the word radical?

I didn't mean to use that. What's radical about this guy?

Nothing. He's just like you!

Well, not exactly.

But let's talk about communism, next!

Now, the new mayoral candidate that's running there in New York City. That so many young people rushed to defend and vote for. He's promising free buses.

That's going to work out.

Where are you going to get the money for free buses.

It's free!

City-run grocery stores.

Oh, rent freezes. And finally somebody has done it. A 30-dollar minimum wage.

So under the banner of equity. And, you know, we will tax the wealthy. And the corporations. You know, we're going to squeeze another $10 billion out of them.

Really?

Because they're going to call a U-Haul.

You know, they will call something like U-Haul. There will be a lot of -- there will be a lot of movers that are like, how do I get the truck back from Texas or Florida back up to New York? Nobody is moving up there.

But he's going to do it.

Now, his vision isn't really new. You know, just -- just tax people, so we could have city-run grocery stores. You know, I remember -- I'm old enough to remember those city-run grocery stores in Moscow.

They were great.

The shelves were empty.

But that's just Moscow.

It worked out completely different in Venezuela.

Where, oh, no.

It didn't. That's right. The grocery store.

They were eating the zoo animals.

But it will be different in New York.

Because they have rent controls too.

And that will just choke the housing supply, but don't worry. As a young family.

You know, you voted for it.

You know better.

It will work this time.

So, you know, I like building ideas, I just don't like usually building on the graves of 100 million people.

But, you know, why not? Why not?

You know, use this dogma.

And this time, it will be different. It's not like it was in China. Where the great leap forward, was a gross -- a gross parody of progress. Venezuela, which was oil rich. One of the richest nations in the hemisphere now sees 90 percent of its population in poverty!

Yeah. Darn it. You know what they did?

They decided to take state control of things.

You know, like grocery stores. And it worked out well. How is that free busing working out in Venezuela?

I just want to -- I just want to know.

Anyway, then you've got the globalize the intifada. Which is going to drop a little violence in, and anti-Semitism in with your communism.

Which is weird!

Because violence and anti-Semitism, always happen. When it -- when it comes to -- when it comes to communism.

This is weird!

I've got to play something for you. Because this has talked about on me earlier this morning.

Oh, wow.

Wait a minute. This is -- this is the whole coalition coming together here.

So this is going to be good. New York, this is going to be great.

It's going to be great for you.

No. He's going to uplift you. Then the social fabric of New York City is just going to be -- just one.

It's going to be fantastic. Don't worry about your 120 billion dollars in debt. Or your 10 billion-dollar deficit that you have right now.

You are going to charge the rich more taxes, and they will stay right there.

They will be like, you know what, that 46 percent in taxes that I'm paying, this is just not enough. It's just not enough.

I need to pay 60 or 70 percent to be able to pay my fair share. So that's good. That's good. That's good.

You know, they're not risking 100 million people. It's just 8 million people.

This time, it's just 8 million people.

But, hey. For those of you in upstate New York. That aren't going to be part of this experiment.

Don't worry, you get to pay for it. Because they'll kick it up to the state. The state will have to subsidize everything. And don't you love it?

Really, don't you want to subsidize the really crazy ideas of New York City?

I mean, why don't you have a -- why don't you have a democratic socialist. A/k/a communist mayor.

Why haven't you done that? Are you not progressive enough? Are you not looking into the future?

Are you stuck in the past?

I don't know. I don't know. The graveyard is pretty big. I have a hard time getting past that one. You know, yeah, so I'm stuck in the past. Because I can't seem to pass that graveyard, and get to be down the path with you. But it's going to be a paradise.

Forget arithmetic. You know, or human nature. This time, it's going to work. It's going to work. So all right!

Wish I lived in this morning.

No wait. Nope. I don't. Nope, I don't.

And Ted Cruz, stop it. Stop writing, hey, come to Texas. No. No. Don't come to Texas. Don't come to Florida. Go to California. It's beautiful this time of year. Go there. Go there.