Why is Everyone Blaming RUSSIA for Havana Syndrome NOW?
RADIO

Why is Everyone Blaming RUSSIA for Havana Syndrome NOW?

An ex-government investigator and CBS’s “60 Minutes” are now suggesting that Russia is behind the mysterious “Havana Syndrome.” This is despite a 2023 government report that found no evidence that Havana Syndrome was caused by foreign agents. So, what has changed? Why is this back in the news? And why are people suddenly blaming Russia? Glenn digs into the facts, including two big coincidences: The U.S. House is about to give Ukraine more aid and many of the alleged Havana Syndrome victims have one thing in common …

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: There's something else that is bothering me.

In fact, let's -- can we play from yesterday's clips? Can we play the 60 Minutes, former Pentagon investigator says US officers attacked by Russians. This is cut four. This is really important. Listen to this.

VOICE: Are we being attacked?

VOICE: My personal opinion, by whom?

VOICE: Russia.

VOICE: Greg ed Green ran the investigation for the defense intelligence agency. He would not discuss classified information, but he described his team's work from 2021 to 2023.


VOICE: We were collecting a large body of data. Ranging from signals intelligence. Human intelligence.

Open source reporting. Anything, regarding the internet. Travel record. Financial records. You name it.

Unfortunately, I can't get into specifics, based on the classification. But I can tell you, at a very early stage, I started to focus on Moscow.

GLENN: Can you tell me about the pattern's you began to see?

VOICE: One of the things I started to notice was the caliber of our officer, that was being impacted. This wasn't happening to our worst or our middle range officers.

This was happening to our top five, 10 percent performing officers, across the Defense Intelligence Agency.

And consistent eight, there was a Russia nexus.

There was some angle, where they had worked against Russia. Focused on Russia. And done extremely well.

The impact has been that, the intelligence officers, and our diplomats working abroad, are being removed from their post with traumatic brain injuries. They're being neutralized.

GLENN: Hmm. They're being neutralized. And Russia was involved. Cut two, please, from today.

VOICE: It was like this piercing feeling on the side of my head. I remember it was on the right side of my head. And I got like vertigo.

VOICE: Olivia Troy was Homeland Security advisor to Vice President Mike Pence.

In our 2022 report, she told us she was hit outside the White House.

VOICE: And then severe ear pain started. So I liken it to, if you put a Q-tip too far, and you're bouncing off your ear drum. Well, imagine taking a sharp pencil. And kind of poking that.

VOICE: And this man told us, he was among the first publicly known cases in 2016, from our embassy in Cuba. That's how the incidence became known as Havana syndrome. He's medically retired from an agency he can't name. Blind in one eye, and struggling for balance.

GLENN: Okay. All right.

STU: It's really weird.

GLENN: It is weird, isn't it? What do you go away with?

STU: On that particular report?

GLENN: What you just heard. What do I take away from that?

STU: Russia is apparently attacking our -- our government officials.

GLENN: Right.

STU: With some sort of weapon? That -- not really explained there. But we've heard about Havana syndrome before.

GLENN: Right.

STU: It seems to be really affecting people who are really hit with what this is.

GLENN: All right. Now, let me take you back to 2023. This is a briefing from the State Department.

Cut three, please.

VOICE: It has been the broad conclusion of the intelligence community since March 2023. That it's unlikely a foreign adversary is responsible for these anomalous health incidents. It's something that the intelligence community has investigated extensively. And continues to look at. We will look at new information as it comes in. And make assessments inside the State Department. And with our intelligence community.

VOICE: You can't confirm whether they agree with that in this building?

VOICE: No, they do share that.

GLENN: Hmm. Hmm.

STU: I remember that. That was the big story.

GLENN: Yeah. This is from the Washington Post. A year ago.

The mysterious ailment known as Havana syndrome did not result from the actions of a foreign adversary, according to intelligence report. That shatters a long disputed theory, that hundreds of US personnel were targeted, and sickened by clandestine enemy wielding energy waves as a weapon. The new intelligence assessment caps a year's long effort by the CIA, and several other US intelligence agencies to explain why career diplomats, intelligence officers, and others. Serving in US missions around the world. Experienced what they described as strange and painful acoustic sensations. Many of the afflicted personnel say they were victims of a deliberate attack, possibly in the hands of Russia. Or other adversarial government.

A claim that the report contradicts nearly every aspect, according to two intelligence officials, who are familiar with the assessment, described to the Washington Post. Seven intelligence agencies, participated in a review of approximately 1,000 cases. Of health incidents.

The term, the government uses to describe, a constellation of physical symptoms, including ringing in the ears, followed by pressure in the head, and nausea.

Five of have those agents determined it was very unlikely that a foreign adversary was responsible for the symptoms, either as a result of purposeful actions, such as directed energy weapons. Or a by-product of some other activity, including electronic surveillance that made people sick.

They spoke on the condition of anonymity. One agency, which the officials did not name. Determined that it was unlikely that a foreign actor was at fault, a slightly less emphatic finding.

That did not appreciably change the consensus.

One agency abstained in its conclusion regarding a foreign actor. But when asked, no agency dissented from the conclusion, that a foreign actor did not cause the symptoms.

One of the intelligence officials said. Now, that came out, a year ago.

So one would have to ask the government, were I lying then, or are you lying now?


STU: Is it that these are just people within these investigations, who are disagreeing with the final of the government report?

Because I remember the report. It was a big story at the time.

It was a big thing.

Like everyone, for years and years and years, were told about the Havana syndrome.

Very suspicious and strange.

But no one really knew. And then they came out with this report. This was our conclusion.

We came up with it. It wasn't anybody.

They kind of made it seem like, these were unrelated, sort of general health ailments these people were going through.

Well, let's go through some of this.

60 Minutes spoke with retired general officer, Lieutenant Colonel Greg Edgreen.

Now, remember, he said one agents -- one agents -- or the report a year ago said, one agency didn't agree. So let's just say, that Greg is the guy, who said, I'm not taking a position on this one.

STU: Sure. Okay.

GLENN: He said, that Russia appeared to be the common denominator across most cases concerning Havana Syndrome. One of the things I started to notice was the caliber of our officers.

Okay. Remember? What he just said. Our top five or 10 percent performing officers.

So let's look at those who were targeted.

The investigative journalist also claimed to have obtained an accounting document linked to a top secret Russian intelligence unit called 21159, which outlines a bonus payment for an officer who worked on a project. Concerning potential capabilities of non-lethal weapons.

When I saw it, I literally had tears in my eyes, because it was spelling out, what they had been doing. Said one of the -- one of the victims.

It's not definitive proof of Havana Syndrome Cause. It's the closest to a receipt, you can have, however, for this. Okay. So who are some of these people?

Who are some of the people that were linked? And is it real or a hoax? Let me go there, next.
(music)
It seems like the battle in this country is always uphill, especially when it comes to fighting against the left's constant efforts to destroy America from within.

But hope persists and one of the things we can do is patronize, the businesses who stand for the same principles that you and I stand for.

Patriot Mobile is one of those businesses. They offer dependable, nationwide coverage, so you can access any of the three major networks, that other people are on.

But you don't have to worry that part of your bill is to fund leftist causes. Just had dinner with these guys, last night, at a fundraiser.

And they are -- man, they are everywhere. Everywhere.

And doing some amazing things behind the scenes to help us save the country and the Constitution. Their 100 percent US-based customer service team, is going to make the switch over to Patriot Mobile really easy.

Whether you're keeping your number or your phone, or you're upgrading one or both.

Just go to PatriotMobile.com/Beck. Or call 972PATRIOT.

Make sure you use the name Beck, and you will get free activation when you use that offer code.

So join -- join me and the switch today. It's PatriotMobile.com/Beck. PatriotMobile.com/Beck.

Or call 972PATRIOT.
(music)
Ten-second station ID.

Okay. Let's look at what's happening with the CBS report. CBS doesn't have -- and neither did the FBI, have any interest in protecting one of the -- one of the main sources here. That is supposed to be high level intelligence.

Nobody seems to be caring about hiding her identity.

Moreover, CBS acknowledges on multiple occasions. That the FBI has been in the loop, regarding her appearance. And talking points on CBS.

This means that CBS and the FBI have been working in concert on this story.

Which leads to a variety of questions about the independence of 60 minutes, in reporting the story, accurately without any bias.

Remember, the Deep State, they keep going to the same sources that have lied to them, over and over again.

Throughout the piece, there is a stunning lack of real evidence, that delivers a direct link between the Russian agents. Directed energy weapons.

And the variety of claimed injuries.

Now, is there any link. Are there any questions, that should be asked.

Well, here's one. Why isn't Moscow using this weapon against Zelinsky?

Why is there no evidence of Russia using these devices on any battle food, such as Ukraine, or Syria?

There's a journalist, his name is Hans -- Hans Maccadee (phonetic). He noticed, and spoke on X.

He said, it's really important to scrutinize the individual, current, and the former government agents, who claim to be suffering.

So who are they?

Well, one of them is retired from the CIA, in 2019.

Currently, an MSNBC contributor. He was one of the many former government agents who claimed that Hunter Biden's laptop was disinformation.

Myles Taylor, another one, is -- wrote the infamous. Anonymous, anti-Trump letter.

Made a career of leveraging his government credentials to write best-selling Trump-bashing Fannie Mae fiction. Olivia Troy, she's a former adviser to Mike Pence. She's followed a similar path to Mr. Taylor.

And the last one, waged the campaign to get social media, to censor critics, falsely accused several people of being Russian-controlled accounts.

Seems like, we have the same kind of people running around.

All right. Let me tell you about Byrna.

When you're target practicing the whole time, you're standing there, looking down range at the main-shaped target. You're thinking to yourself some version of shoot to kill. You should be. If you have to draw that gun to defense for yourself or other members of your family. Or whomever.

It's not an option. Shoot to kill.

But not everything is a shoot to kill moment.

The folks over at Byrna technologies are very pro Second Amendment.

They would like to offer you option 2B. The Byrna launcher. It's a non-lethal alternative to safeguarding your home. That will send potential threats, running in the opposite direction. It is legal in all 50 states. No permits or background required.

And can be used by all age-groups over 18. Byrna launcher. Powerful deterrents like tear gas and kinetic rounds with a 60-foot range. Byrna, proudly American.

Get it now. B-Y-R-N-A.com/Glenn. Byrna.com/Glenn.

STU: And BlazeTV.com/Glenn. Use the code Glenn. You'll save 20 bucks off your subscription to Blaze TV.

(OUT AT 8:29 AM)

GLENN: Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program.

STU: So you're going with this piece on Havana syndrome, from Jordan Schachtel, right?

GLENN: Yeah. So it's in the dossier. It's really, really well-written, and I think well thought out. He's asking the question, why now?

Why is this story? And this is something that came up to me, yesterday, when we were talking about it on the air, the 60 minutes, had covered this thing.

Wait a minute. Isn't that the same thing that all of the agencies said was not a foreign actor?

Yeah. Well, he thought the same thing, and he went in, and he looked into who these people are. And they're all people that, you know, have either been anti-Trump. Pro-Hunter Biden.

They're all the people that were involved in all of this garbage over the last few years, about Russia. And so that's kind of a coincidence. I mean, incredible.

He points out, in his article, is it perhaps because the House is set to vote on both the massive seizing of Russian assets, and the infusion of cash for the war in Ukraine.

They're set to vote on that, right around the corner. So are they -- is this just another set up? By the government.

Using CBS, to carry the water, to say, see. See how bad they are. It doesn't make sense to me.

It obviously doesn't make sense to him either. What does make sense is that you're being set up and lied to. Because you're either being lied to last year. Or you're being lied to now. Which is it? Which is it?

Well, I would imagine, that you're probably being lied to now, seeing that money is involved. And you watch. You watch. They're going to come out with -- with the Ukraine money. And they're going to say, it's -- it's a loan.

It's just a loan. We're just going to loan them this money. They will pay us back. But it will be a forgivable loan. You watch.

The BIGGEST Issue With Trump’s SCOTUS Immunity Case
RADIO

The BIGGEST Issue With Trump’s SCOTUS Immunity Case

Former president Donald Trump is battling multiple legal challenges. But everything could change if the Supreme Court rules that he has full presidential immunity. However, there’s a big issue. Former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Andrew McCarthy joins Glenn to explain why he believes the Court may NOT grant Trump full immunity. Plus, Andrew weighs in on whether Trump has a chance of moving his trials away from New York and Washington, D.C. and why former presidents haven’t been taken to court before.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Andy McCarthy, a National Review contributing editor, the Institute's Senior fellow, and a former chief assistant US attorney general. We won't hold this against him.

He was a former US attorney in the -- in the district of Manhattan.

So we'll just leave that alone.

Andy, how are you?

ANDY: Glenn, I'm doing great. How are you?

GLENN: Very, very good.

So let's start with the big story. I think, and that is the Supreme Court.

And what they were arguing last week, can you give me your honest take on what -- what this is really about for the future. Beyond Donald Trump. And how you think this will affect what is happening with Donald Trump.

ANDY: Glenn, I think it's important that you frame a question that way. Because it seemed to me.

And I reread the transcript over the weekend.

After listening to the oral argument.

The court is a lot more concerned, about the presidency, than about Trump.

GLENN: Sure. Should be.

ANDY: Yeah.

And it's -- it's an important point make. Because a lot of the coverage, has been this hysteria over whether, you know, the Trump packed Supreme Court is in the tank for him.

And they're going to get rid of Jack Smith's prosecution.

I don't think that will happen at all.

It's possible that Smith won't get his case to trial.

Depending on what the court does.

What I think the court is going to do, is send the case back to judge chuck in. Who was the trial judge in Washington. With instructions to sort out what things in the indictment against Trump are what you would call official acts, that might arguably be immune from prosecution, because they go to the core responsibility of the presidency.

And what are private acts or private wrongs. That he would not have immunity for, even though they have been enduring his presidency.

But the -- the upshot of the questioning, of the lawyers. Including Trump's lawyer, and this is particularly by Justice Barron. Justice Kagan. Trump's lawyer admitted that there's a lot of conduct charged in the indictment, that is private conduct, that really wouldn't be covered by an immunity claim.

Even though Trump has been saying a lot of stuff about absolute, complete immunity. And I think the concessions he made in the argument, that is John Sauer. Trump's lawyer, would be enough. If Smith was willing to tailor his indictment, down to the things that Sauer conceded, they could go ahead with the trial on just those acts.

He would lose a lot of evidence, but he probably should.

GLENN: So what are some of the acts that could fall under -- you know, private, and so you could prosecute. And what are the acts that are the president, and you don't prosecute?

ANDY: Yeah. So the one bright line that we can take away from this. Is that there seems to be consensus, that there is a -- a divide between office seeking, and the carrying out of the duties of an office.

So if something is purely in the nature of trying to get reelected. That's deemed to be private. Because it's not part of the duty, of the presidency.

It would be the same for anyone who was seeking office. Whether that person was an incumbent or not.

And then there were other things, that are clearly presidential.

So just to give some solid examples. That came out of the argument. Trump's lawyer conceded, that if Trump made a private scheme with private lawyers to get electors, designated for him and to supply documents to the Congress. Suggesting that they were the authentic, actually slate of electors, designated by the state.

That would be private conduct.

Because it's -- it's purely office seeking. And he carried it out, only with private lawyers.

On the other hand, there's an allegation in the indictment, that Trump tried to use the justice department. To signal to states, that there were serious concerns about fraud. And consider both removing the attorney general, when he got pushback. And considered sending a letter, that they never sent from the Justice Department to the state of Georgia, to tell them, you know, that they needed to do more scrutiny over what happened in the popular election. Trump argued very strongly. And I think the court will probably go along with this. That that is the president's control over the Justice Department, is -- is purely a presidential act, that has no part in a criminal prosecution.

GLENN: Correct.

ANDY: On those are the kinds of things that they are talking about sorting out.

GLENN: When Trump sat another group of electors, or tried to. That's what -- that's what the friends of Dershowitz did. I don't remember all of the attorneys. In the 2000 election.

That's what they were recommending, to be done. You have to do that. Or you have no case.


ANDY: Yeah. Well, let me just be clear, Glenn. They're not saying that Trump wouldn't have a defense at trial.

What we're talking about now is purely immunity. That is who he got the trial from happening in the first place. I think there's significant defenses to the fraudulent electors playing. Beginning with the fact that the electors themselves, didn't think they were fraudulent. They thought they were contingent.

They thought they were basically sitting in as a slate of electors, in the event that Trump prevailed either in the state courts or in the state legislature, to throw out the popular election. Then that would activate.

But they weren't trying to fool anyone into saying, that they were the actual electors that had been certified by the state.

GLENN: Can you get a fair trial on that? If indeed he has to go to court?

ANDY: Well, I think it's tough for him to get a fair trial, in Washington.

GLENN: Why isn't -- why can't someone make the case here?

Why can't his people make the case? That you can't get a fair trial, with the jury pool in New York, or in Washington, DC.

ANDY: I think Trump's problem is he's too famous in some ways.

The problem is that unlike almost any other defendant, he goes and says, one of the things that they can always says about him. He's the most famous guy in the world. And no matter where you have the case, you have the same pretrial publicity problems. And they kind of reject out of hand, the thought that because a jurisdiction votes substantially against Trump as a political matter.

That means they can't be fair to him as a legal matter.

You know, you can -- you can debate that all you want. About whether that's a sensible distinction to draw or not.

But it's a distinction the courts draw.

GLENN: Okay. What do you think is come downtown pike on this?

Based on -- go ahead.

ANDY: Yeah. I think they will send the case back to Judge Chutkan with instructions to go through the indictment and figure out, what's a public act and what's a private act.

If Smith wants to fight on that, then he's never going to get to trial, prior to Election Day. Which, of course, is his aim.

Because this would still be a live immunity claim, and immunity is one of the few things that you can actually appeal pre-trial. So I don't see how he would get to trial. But I do think Smith, if he wants to. And if it's that important to him to get to trial, quickly. He could say, you know what, I will dispense with all of the acts that you say are immunized, official, presidential acts. And we will just go to the trial on the private stuff.

It would be a weaker case for him.

But it wouldn't be an unwinnable case.

GLENN: And what is the punishment?

ANDY: Well, that's an interesting question. Because that may depend on another Supreme Course case this term. The one they argued, a week before on the obstruction statute, that is key to Trump's case.

That obstruction statute has a 20-year penalty. And it's the two main counts in the indictment against Trump.

The other two counts only have five-year penalties. So if the Supreme Court says that it rejects the way the Justice Department has been using the obstruction statute. Which it might. Then that would require probably a big overhaul of Smith's case. Because those charges are very important to him.

But if the court upholds that statute. Which it also might. Then you are looking at a potential of, you know, 40 years imprisonment.

Now, he won't get 40 years. But statutorily, there would be 40 years imprisonment.

On those charges. And I think ten on the other two. The other two are fraud on the United States. And the civil rights charge.

So he would be looking at, you know, statutorily 50 years imprisonment. Which would indicate, under the sentencing guidelines, that he would get, I would think. You know, four or five, six years.

Of a sentence. If he gets convicted on those charges.

GLENN: Unbelievable. You know, last week, the Biden administration was making the case, well, Donald Trump is the on me one that has ever broken the law. That's why we've never had this before. That's such crap, and we all know it.

Why haven't we had this problem before?

ANDY: I think a lot of the criminal -- the potential prosecutable criminal conduct has come up, late in presidential terms. Like, for example, with Clinton.

The pardon scandal happened as he was going out the door. And I was in the Justice Department, at the time.

There was -- there was over a year of pretty intense debate within the Justice Department, about whether he ought to be charged with bribery or not. In connection with those pardons.

But I think there's -- maybe this has changed now.

But there's always been a current of like, when a new administration comes in. Particularly if it's a new administration of a different party. They don't want to revisit what happened, with the last guy.

They want to just go ahead, on their own stuff.

This whole idea, we're looking forward. We're not looking back. That certainly had a lot to do with why the Bush Justice Department didn't prosecute Clinton.

And I think with Obama, there was a lot of rhetoric, during the 2008 campaign, about war crimes against Bush and all that stuff.

But when they got into power. They not only weren't interested in prosecuting anyone on war crimes. They reopened the CIA investigation. But then they closed it.

But they actually ended up adopting a lot of Bush/Cheney counterterrorism.

You know, I think, there's a lot of rhetorical campaign stuff about how, you know, lock her up.

And we will put these guys in jail.

But it doesn't come to pass. I actually think Trump is serious about it, this time. Because they've seen what they've done to have.

That's why I thought it was amusing in the Supreme Court argument. For the government lawyers to get up and say, you know, you don't have to worry about this.

This is just generous with Trump, it will never happen again.

And in the meantime, Trump is ahead in the polls. And he's running as the retribution candidate. He's promised he's going to do this stuff, right?

So -- so it's an amazing time to be alive, right?

Andy, tell me about how Alvin Brag's doing, so far.

ANDY: It's a terrible case. I think -- I wrote a column about this today, called How Judge Merchan is Orchestrating Trump's Conviction.

And I was reminded of, you know, the fact that Trump when he was a young guy, learned a lot about litigation from Roy Cohen.

And, you know, what Cohen used to say, his first principle of hardball litigation was, don't tell me what the law is, tell me who the judge is.

And I think Trump knows that. He knows it very well.

And as I'm closely watching the rulings. That are being made. And the arguments that the judge is allowing to be made. It's clear, that he has allowed Bragg. And just, so the people understand, this case is indicted as a falsification of business records, that occurred in the months of February through December of 2017.

Those are the only charges in the indictment. The case is being presented to the jury, as a conspiracy from 2015 through 2017, to steal the 2016 election by violations of federal campaign finance law, which Alvin Bragg, as a state prosecutor, has no authority to enforce. And that's the way the case has been framed by the prosecutor.

Based on orders from the judge. And that is the way that they are proceeding, and judge -- and Judge Merchan is allowing the state to prove, that Michael Cohen, pled guilty to two campaign finance offenses. And that David Pecker, the AMI guy, who ran the National Enquirer. That they had a non-prosecution agreement from the Justice Department.

And then paid a fine of $180 of the Federal Election Commission.

For violating federal election law. Now, those -- it's a black letter principle of law. That one person -- let's say person A. His guilty plea is not admissible evidence against person B. Even if A says, A and B acted together.

It's absolutely improper for these -- for this evidence of what Michael Cohen and David Pecker was thinking about the federal election laws. The fact that they made deals with the government. None of that stuff should come in. The judge is letting it in.

And he's not letting Trump explain to the jury, that he, Trump, was not charged by the justice department or the FEC. And the reason is obvious.

Actually expenditures that were cognizable under the federal law.

And he's also not letting Trump call an expert witness to explain campaign lay to the jury.

So what the jury is going to hear about campaign law is going to come from Michael Cohen and David Pecker.

So it's a farce.

GLENN: How is this a fair trial?

If you can't call people -- and you can't let the -- the jury know. Truly, the other side of it?

TRENT: Yeah. Look, it's even more fundamentally unfair than that.

In the United States, under the fifth amendments of the Constitution.

You are entitled, that you will be charged with a felony.

It has to be on the basis of an indictment returned by a grand jury, that explicitly says what the charge is.

The indictment in this case, talks about false bookkeeping in 2017. A case that has been presented to the jury, is a conspiracy to violate the he federal election laws.

It's mind-boggling, that it's being permitted.

GLENN: Wow.

Andy, thank you so much.

I appreciate it.

This would definitely lose in a higher court, don't you think?

ANDY: I do. But I think it will be -- I mean, Harvey Weinstein's conviction just got reversed last week. That was three years.

WATCH: Pro-Palestine Protesters TAKE OVER College Campuses
RADIO

WATCH: Pro-Palestine Protesters TAKE OVER College Campuses

Pro-Palestine protesters have taken over college campuses across America, from Columbia University in New York to The George Washington University in DC and Cal Poly Humboldt in California. Over the weekend, the protesters set up autonomous zones in solidarity with Gaza, held Islamic prayer sessions, and chanted about intifada. Glenn and Stu review some of the most insane clips. But one of the craziest ones is out of Canada, where protesters chanted "long live October 7th." And if that wasn't ignorant enough, Glenn also reviews a clip of a drag queen leading children in a chant of "free Palestine."

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

STU: Well, what a weekend it was. What a weekend it was.

The constant protests, I guess are the big story, over the weekend.

And it doesn't seem to be stopping.

Seems to be the only thing that Americans want to do these days. Is protest the right of Israel to exist.

That's apparently controversial now.

It's amazing to see this happen.

We're seeing university after university after university, step up. and decide that the hill they are going to die on is the hill that supports Hamas. This is apparently a popular position in this country. And an incredible moment that we're in right now.

Let's -- let's go to sot one, if we could, on our list. I'm not sure if are these available. Having a little bit of a technical issue. There we go. We're having an Islamic prayer being held.
(music)
I have this album.
(music)
Just bought it on vinyl. Now, these are the quietest of the protests around the country. Most of this really weren't like this. Outside of the White House Correspondents' Dinner. There was more protesting going on. This is...

Missing the visuals here. You have -- so bizarre.

VOICE: Wiped off the face of --

GLENN: So this is someone dressed as an Israeli soldier, and there's a bunch of blindfolded, shirtless people who get hit by blue powder and collapse, which is making a good point.

GLENN: No. I think this is -- this is the really killing the white man. Which is supposed to be the Palestinian. But they're white men. Most of them. Which I think just makes it even more confusing for anybody who was -- who was watching.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: You know, I have to go back to the Islamic prayer. I mean, I don't know about you. I miss it times. Could you play the -- could you go back and play the Islamic prayer for me, please?

If you happen to be watching TheBlaze, I just want to describe the Islamic prayer here.

Everybody is on a prayer rug there at Columbia University.

It's a beautiful, beautiful scene.

And -- yes.

And this guy is very, very popular in the upper east side.

So you have people, you know, on a prayer run. We had to go to the Supreme Court to get the coach to be able to pray by himself on the field, after a football game.

But this is totally cool. And the next thing is, they're including women in the call to prayer. Which is very popular, in the Middle East.

They love it, when a woman gets down and pray right looping side the men. It is -- it's wonderful. It's truly, truly wonderful.

Now, let's go to cut four. This is in Canada. This is in Vancouver. Right. Okay. Can we stop there for just a second.

Stu, can you just explain? The geography of Israel. I know there's the sea, on the west coast of Israel. What's on the east coast of Israel, or the easternmost, furthest east you could go?

STU: That would be a river, Glenn.

GLENN: That would be --

STU: Yeah. So what's interesting about this. That's how you know it's an aspirational call for unity. From the river to the sea. So that Palestine, will just take over everything from Israel. There will be no Jews left.

That's the call for unity. It's aspirational.

GLENN: Unity. Okay. It's an aspirational call for unity. That sounds very specific, that language. Like, that's what they're saying on college campuses.

STU: And Rashida Tlaib, right out of her mouth.

GLENN: Okay. Good.

So an aspirational call for unity. The only thing you could be unified on is get rid of all the Jews. Because that means there is no Israel.
So no two-state solution.

STU: Yeah, that was another slogan.

We don't want no two-state. We want everything. That was the chant that was coming down.

GLENN: Right. Well, but see, they make it clear.

They want everything. And we don't want no -- no one state. So they've got a double negative there.

Which means they want a two-state solution.

And they say, we want everything. And that must include a one state and a two-state solution.

So I think that is very, very clear. Now, can we go on and play what they were saying in Canada. It was cut four.

VOICE: We demand a free Palestine. From the river to the sea.

GLENN: Yeah.

VOICE: And we stand with the Palestinian resistance, and their heroic, and brave action on October 7th.

They said, long live October 7th.

And we say, today, long live October 7th!

VOICE: Long live October 7th.

STU: Oh, my God.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

You know, I love it when the Nazis are like, long live the Holocaust. You know.

Hey, long those cool -- really cool showers and oven system that we came up with.

You know, that --

STU: Clunky slogan.

GLENN: It's a clunky slogan. But -- but a true slogan.

STU: But the equivalent of what they're saying. The equivalent of what they're saying on these college campuses. The ones that everybody in the media seem to be supporting.

Long live freaking October 7th. I mean, can you be any more -- I don't know, Glenn. Is this one still borderline? Is this one anti-Semitic, or are we not sure? Is this an aspirational call for unity? I can't quite tell.

GLENN: Well, we know it's brave. We know it's brave. Well, October 7th was a very brave day. It was brave and heroic what they did. Really.

STU: Really?

GLENN: Yeah. Do you think it takes courage to go molest, slaughter, and then burn babies? Sure. Sure, it takes courage to do that. You might get caught and then seen for the monster that you really are.

But in this case, no. They're celebrated. So it's brave and historic.

Now, in California. Cal Poly, cut five.

Does this have audio with it?

STU: We're seeing the video of this. Apparently, no sound to it.

Yet again, graffiti, inside the hallways here. Some words we maybe don't say on the radio.

To recap.

GLENN: Are they grown up words?

STU: They're grown up words. Big girl, big boy words.

This has been just people ruining the facilities, and it's very messy. And there's graffiti everywhere inside the building.

It's wonderful. This is another aspirational call.

GLENN: You remember, kill all the Jews. Kill all the Jews. It helps you remember all of that.

Now, beyond kill all the Jews. There's something new they're calling for. Cut 48, please.

This is in Germany, of all places. The big Palestinian uprising in Germany this weekend. And what are they calling for?


STU: It doesn't sound good. Never sounds good in German.


GLENN: No. That's not in German. That's in Arabic.

Whenever you get someone in German going, (foreign language). No matter what language it is, you know it's trouble. Don't worry, they were just calling for a caliphate. So they're not wanting to bring the Nazis back. They just want a caliphate.

STU: Aspirational.

GLENN: Yeah. Very inspirational. Now, if I could just get the drag queens and the caliphate people, you know. If I could just get them together, one stop shop, I think we would be set.

Here's cut 30.

VOICE: Today what we're going to do is we're going to shout, free Palestine. Can we do that?

VOICE: Free Palestine.

VOICE: Shout.

VOICE: Free Palestine.

GLENN: Oh.

VOICE: You know it, and you really want to show. You're a drag queen and you know it, shout.

VOICE: Free Palestine!

GLENN: See, this is the united message, we can get the kids involved too. Because we have a drag queen. And if you're a drag queen and you know it. Shout free Palestine.

So it's one place, we can get both of those things, where we can all come together.

STU: Hmm. Yeah.

That's an amazing clip. I think -- now, this is just me speculating, Glenn.

Because I'm not a travel agent.

I don't work for a tourism board.

But I do wonder how that particular event will go down, if held in Gaza. Would it be different? Because they are cheering on Palestine. Obviously, there's some affinity there. The drag queen story hour group, reading to, let's say, the Gazan children. How would that work out in Gaza itself?

GLENN: You know, it's funny you should ask that, Stu. You may not be a travel agent. Or work for some sort of tourism.

But you are a thinker. You are a thinker. This has thank you.

GLENN: And that's really what counts.
Here's the good news: They -- the protesters are going to love it! They're going to love it.

What happened in Iraq? Just this weekend? They made it illegal to be on the spectrum. The sexual spectrum at all. You're either a man or a woman. Men have sex with women. Women have sex with men.

Now, that's not all the time. Because, you know, there's a shortage of women over in the Middle East. Sometimes they have to get a little of them going on with the younger men, you know what I mean? You know what I'm saying?

But we don't talk about that. I didn't say any of that. I don't even know what you're talking about. Say, what?

But so they've outlawed now homosexuality, which is weird, because Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, he said, at one point, I think it was at Columbia University, when asked about them gays. He said, we don't have any gay people in Iran.

And lo and behold, they're going to make that wish come true. So you have that going for you.

Also, by the way, they just killed their third -- where is this story? Their third TikToker. She was -- no. Seriously, she was -- no. She was -- she was -- well, she's dead. She's dead.

She was a very popular influencer, in Iran.

And she's a woman. And she was shown dancing.

But she wasn't just dancing. She was wearing jeans. And they were a little too tight.

Me personally, I don't -- I don't mind, you know, some sort of law, against jeans that are too tight on some people.

You know what I'm saying?

You know, you walk around Walmart, once in a while. And they're like, oh. Those don't work on you, honey.

But I don't want to see you execute it. But she was executed, because they were a little too tight. And too suggestive.

And she was laying in a bed. Well, she was reading her son a good night story.

But she was still in those jeans laying on a bed. So they had to execute her, over the weekend. So the crackdown continues.

And, hey, all you people on campus, with your little rug prayer thing. With the woman right next to you.

You know how popular that's going to be. And all you drag queens, oh. They love you.

They love you. In fact, I am going to set up a personal fund. If you're a drag queen. If you are a gay activist.

And you're out, because you love it. And you show it. Clap your hands!

I am going to go ahead, and having you airfare from wherever I live in the United States. To the Gaza Strip.

Okay? And bring your pamphlets. Bring your pamphlets. Bring your best wigs and your spikey high heels. Bays they are going to love you there.

And when you stop writing us, or calling us, we'll know exactly how much they love you.

Over there. So maybe we could send that as a message to all of your friends over here. What the hell is wrong with you?

STU: Glenn, you were running through those wonderful stories in the Middle East.

And you mentioned Iran and Ahmadinejad, and a bunch of stories that happened in Iraq. And you kind of went back and forth. I don't know if people followed that exactly.

Because it was Iran, who had said there was no gays, years and years ago in Columbia. And both of the stories banning homosexuality and the TikToker being executed, both happen in Iraq.

And what I found fascinating about that is, we should be able to tell the difference. Right?

We were supposedly helping out this country, so that it did not end up like Iran.

GLENN: Stop it. It's only a trillion dollars. It's only a trillion dollars.

You get what you pay for.

You want to go in half-assed like that. You get what you pair pay for.

Now, 2 trillion. 2 trillion.

That just is somebody who mildly hates gays.

No. No. But, yeah. We didn't do the job. So what we did. We empowered the head of the snake.

We made the head of the snake even more powerful.

The head of the snake, over in the Middle East. Is Iran.

And now it's -- now you have Iranian Shias all over in Iraq.

And so they're doing the thing that Shias love. And that's kill people, that disagree with them.

Wow, that's weird. Because wow, that's almost like the left here in America.

Oh, I see what they have in common. They just like silencing people. Throwing them in jail. Or killing them. If they disagree with them. Wow. Too bad we can't get them to agree on the same kind of people.

Or we should get the two of them together. Oh. Because they'll like each other.

A lot. No. No. No.

I think the left, when they get there, they will be like, hi. Everybody.

We brought birthday cakes. And candles. And we will decorate this mosque all up. And they'll love it! In the Shiite world.

STU: These regimes that you're talking about there, too. They're not the ones to fear.

It's Donald Trump.

Trump is the one to fear.

Like, that's the guy. If you have to be really terrified about something coming down the road.

It's definitely not the Islamic extremist regimes we're discussing.

It's, instead, the -- the -- the tyranny of the -- you know, real estate developer from Manhattan.

GLENN: Yeah. You know, he want -- he's a man of tyranny. It's clear. He hates them gays so much.

He was the first president to, you know, open a party openly. And say, hey. I'm going to appoint gay people openly.

I will have the first gay person speak on the podium. I will be the first president that actually runs and say, I don't have a problem with gay people. You know, you got to fear him. But the guy who wants to chop your pee-pee off. And throw you off a building.

You know, that happens to be, coming across our border right now. Don't fear him.

There's nothing to fear there. Nothing to worry about.

Is the Global Cabal a Conspiracy Theory? | The Glenn Beck Podcast | Ep 218
THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Is the Global Cabal a Conspiracy Theory? | The Glenn Beck Podcast | Ep 218

Are we witnessing the controlled demolition of America? In this episode of "The Glenn Beck Podcast," award-winning journalist Alex Newman tells Glenn that the globalist types at the World Economic Forum and the Council on Foreign Relations may be “nice to have a coffee with,” but the one-world government they are promoting won’t be the utopia they think it will be. This isn't the "Global Cabal" conspiracy theory that's all over the internet, but the reality is just as terrifying. Alex makes the case that the U.N. and Bill Gates are building “a giant digital gulag for humanity” to assert digital control from the top down using tools like CBDCs and digital IDs to not only monitor what you do but manipulate it. Sweden already has thousands of people “with microchips in their hands.” “I’m not saying this is the mark of the beast,” Glenn says. “But ...” From FISA and open borders to the war on food and the booby trap of Christian nationalism, Glenn and Alex agree that the solution to our problems is simple: The federal government needs to follow the Constitution, and Americans have to become “a moral and religious people” again.

The ONE Way to STOP the Left from ERASING America
RADIO

The ONE Way to STOP the Left from ERASING America

Our memory is the key to who we are. If we lose our memory, we forget our purpose and who we are meant to be. The same is true for societies, Glenn says. Ever wonder why the Left is so set on destroying American history, rewriting our traditions, and convincing us we're not who we thought we were? Because if we throw the TRUE America down the memory hole, we leave ourselves open to being reprogrammed with lies. But Glenn has a solution: Tell your stories so we don't forget.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Memory is really kind of important.

It's more than a record. It's more than the sum total of our experiences.

The chronicle of our lives. More than a tally of good and bad lessons learned. Although, it is those things as well. But fundamentally, our memory is the key to who we are.

Entities, which lose their memory, people, groups, nations. Lose not just the mere knowledge of their past. Of who they were. Or have been.

But they also lose the knowledge of themselves, the knowledge of their purpose. Of who they are. Who they're meant to be.

They lose the present and the future. Remember when you were a kid. It seemed like everyone on TV, surfed from amnesia at some point?

I thought amnesia would play a big role in life. No. It doesn't. It's like Gilligan's Island and the quicksand. I've never run into quicksand ever before. And I've never had amnesia. Although, some days I would like to have amnesia. But we are memory holing things.

What is the memory hole?

The memory hole was in the -- I think it was the ministry of love.


Where you were taught to hate. And the ministry of truth. Where you were taught, what lies were. And you were forced to do it in 1984.

Memory hole was a -- a door in every room, where people were being taught the truth. And you would open up the little -- the little door. And take whatever the truth was. All of the photos, the documents. And you would throw them in the memory hole. And at the bottom of the memory hole was a fiery furnace. And so it would burn up. All the record. And so it was in the memory hole.

You don't retrieve that in the memory hole. It's gone!

When you lose the knowledge of yourself. The not only of your purpose. What you were meant to be.

You are truly lost. Think of any movie or series that starts with the hero. Waking up to find their memory gone. Their fundamental character traits may remain, but they're unmoored.

Not only unable to recognize family from strangers, but without knowledge of who they are and what that means and how they should act next. All of a sudden, somebody throws a blow, and they are like.

And they're able to just take on anybody.

Whoa!

What kind of man am I?

Am I a killer. They don't know. It leaves people open to manipulation. To being reprogrammed with lies. By whatever bad actor wants to use them for their own purposes. Have you seen Argylle yet? It's exactly what I'm talking about. This is also true for societies. If we forget our stories, if we stop telling them, or allow others to edit them, to suit their purposes, we lose them.

Forget both who we are and who we can and should be. And we leave ourselves open to anyone, with an alternate story to tell.

This is what's happened to religion, Christianity. We've stopped reading the Bible. And so now we're listening to scientists and atheists. And people who say, live for today, man.

What's wrong?

What's wrong with that?, I mean, okay.

O.J. Simpson killed the ice cream man. What's the problem?

He was living life on his terms. There is a problem.

We forget who we are. Who we serve.

And we leave ourselves open.

Now, this is the open intent of the 1619 Project.

And Howard Zinn, it's the logic behind the reimagining policies. Behind the words of Michelle Obama.

VOICE: Barack knows we will have to make sacrifices. We are going to have to change our conversation. We will have to change our traditions, our history. We will have to move into a different place, as a nation to provide the kind of future that we all want.

GLENN: This the trait of every post modern, post Western, post Zionist, post monotheistic, radical atheist thinker, Marxist, or leader.

Just forget the stories of our founding and our purpose. Remember who you are! Simba.

Remember who you are. Wow. That seems kind of important.

That Simba remembers his roots. Why is it not so important for us?

These stories that tell us why we're here, and what we're here to do. We have new stories for you. Stories that will tell us, we're all born in sin. That we're all irredeemably evil.

That we should be torn down forever. Because then we can go ahead and do so. It's always the same. First, the old memories are torn apart. The old stories. They have to be denied.

Delegitimized, erased. And then the new more suitable, enlightened ones, can replace them.

Some including maybe many on the left. Truly believe the old stories are garbage.

But they haven't done their homework.

They truly believe the new stories are true. But they often openly believe that they believe this, all while denying the foundation of the old stories.

Still, they can enjoy the fruits of what's built on that foundation. The material. And moral benefits, that they take for granted. And are currently destroying.

Because it's all they've ever known.

But cut flowers are not life. What happens? You cut a flower, and they fade, wilt, and die.

They're a silent memory of what was, and what could have been. To misquote Patrick Rothfuss.

All around them hangs the cut flowers, silence of a beauty, of a culture, waiting to die.
They don't produce any seeds. There's no next generation of flowers. When they fade, only rot will remain. What was will be no more.

We are cutting the flowers of our future. The ultimate responsibility. And possibly the solution is found with us.

This only happens if we allow someone to cut us from the root. We must tell our stories. We must tell the truth. We must tell the stories of our own lies. Of our families. Do you know why our families are so broken?

Because we don't know where we came from. And I don't mean as a people. I mean as rid.

We don't know the stories of how we got here. We're all immigrants.

That's what everybody says. We're all immigrants.

But how many of us know, who brought the family here?

Why they brought the family here? What it costs them!

We should do this on every available occasion. Family meals. Trips. Dates. Nights out with friends. Honestly, because of everybody having a phone, we're losing them at a faster rate now.

I remember, sitting at the table. Having to sit at the table. While everybody was talking. And all the holidays. And everything else.

And you would look at your sister or brother, and say be like, if I have hear this one more time.

You would hear the same stories over and over again.

Yes! And that's why you know them. Are they happening in your family?

Quintessentially, that's what holidays and rituals are for. Christmas displays and Hanukkahs.
Menorahs. If it's done right, they tell a story. If in the telling, the story grows in some ways. New depth. New focus. More profound meaning.

All the better. If it accumulates anecdotes, commentary, interpretations. It becomes richer.

Turns more and more from an account of something that happened, into a story. Something rich with meaning and lessons. As well as deeds and facts.

Our holidays, Fourth of July, what is it?

We don't even call it Independence Day. We call it Fourth of July.

It's about what? Barbecues?

Maybe fireworks. Maybe sunburn.

Those are important. But how many of us are telling the story?

I know it's awkward and weird at first.

This is the week of Passover.

This is what Passover is all about. The seder night is exactly what we need to be doing.

The entire purpose of that, is to tell the story.

To discuss it. So it and its lessons can be carried on, alive for another generation. And it's been working for Jews for about 3,000 years.

So as Christmas and Easter has kind of done, with Christians. But that's going away.

Fourth of July is going away. Everything in our society is pushing our kids away from the stories. Which means, away from the truth. Of who they are. Where they came from.

Why we're here. As a people.


Well, I'm here because I -- you know. I'm going to be famous on TikTok.

Oh. That's why you were born?

Okay.

Perhaps more effort on the story telling, rather than the grilling could help us with some of the holidays like Independence Day.

And with other stories, we dare not forget. Memory requires a conscience effort. A choice. A ritual.

It requires that a story be told over and over again.

Do you notice that there is a story being told now to Americans, about Americans, to the world.
And it's being told over and over and over again. And look how quickly, because we have a void in our own homes.

Look how quickly everything is being lost.

The first thing we have to do is know the truth. And then stand up for the truth. Stand up to say, no!

You have no right to memory hole an event.