RADIO

ALL the evidence points to THIS culprit in Gaza hospital rocket strike

A debate is raging over who is responsible for a rocket that hit a Baptist hospital in Gaza and allegedly killed 500 people. Israel claims it was a misfire from a Palestinian Islamic jihadist group. But Hamas is blaming Israel. So, what's the truth? Glenn and Stu review the evidence we have so far, including a video that appears to back Israel's claim and new reports that the rocket hit a parking lot, and not the building. But most importantly, they ask why anyone in the media would believe Hamas?!

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. Where do we even begin?

STU: I have an idea.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Maybe -- and this is just a -- I'm going to throw it out there as a theory. A working theory. I would like you to help me work through this idea.

GLENN: Okay. I'm here to help.

STU: Maybe. Just maybe. Maybe we don't just take Hamas' word for what happened.

GLENN: That's crazy. That's crazy.

Now, they have lied to you about absolutely everything.

STU: Yeah. I noticed that.

GLENN: Why wouldn't you take them at their word.

STU: Like if they were to say 500 people were dead at the hospital.

Maybe -- just perhaps.

GLENN: Perhaps.

STU: On the off-chance.

GLENN: Throw it out there.

STU: Maybe we just should ignore their complaint. Because every time they make them, they're lying.

Maybe the death count, that they've been reporting, that comes from Hamas and the Palestinians, maybe we shouldn't believe it at all.

GLENN: Right. Now, you have nothing to back that up.

STU: Well, there's a couple of this.

GLENN: Okay. Let me just show a video. I've got video.

Now, you will see rockets flying. I will show this, if you happen to be watching on TheBlaze. If you're listening on radio or on the podcast, let me just explain what's happening. This is video taken by the Israelis. This is the attack on Israel that happened right before, and you'll see all of the -- see all the rockets being taken off there from Gaza? All right. And then right directly in the path, boom, there is an explosion right after those rockets are launched. You know what that explosion is? That's the hospital. That's the hospital.

STU: The hospital. Five hundred people died.

GLENN: Yeah, not so much.

So there you have, can we show one more here?

Here's another one, the rockets being launched.

You'll see it up in the sky. Something goes wrong.

And it starts to come down. And, oh. Watch it follow, follow, follow. Follow.

Oh. Right on to the hospital.

STU: Huh. Now, that's a rocket fired from -- it's actually not even Hamas. It's another group, right?

GLENN: Palestinian, or something.

STU: Yeah. They fired it from their territory. At Israel. The rocket is -- it's hard to tell what exactly happened. Either failed or shot down in some way.

But the rocket itself goes down to the hospital. And then blows up the hospital. And kills 500 people. And that would be. Maybe you believe that. Then you start looking today, at the new footage that is out. Of the actual hospital in daylight. You know what's weird about this hospital.

You know what may have been happening at this hospital? Maybe they were having a bloc party in the parking lot, and they put all of their patients in the parking lot.

Because that's the only part that seems to be hit at all.

GLENN: Yeah, it's weird.

Because I saw the hospital. It seems still to be there.

STU: Yeah, how did they all die?

GLENN: Well, they were all in the cars apparently.

And the parking lot, all the cars are on fire.

But there is -- I mean, remember. A JDAM -- that's what they said Israel would have used, of course. Because that's what they're using. A JDAM would leave at least, you know, like a little pothole in the parking lot.

STU: I would say a crater would be.

GLENN: Well, sure. If that's the way Israel propaganda for you.

It would leave, you know, kind of a dent in the parking lot. There is no dent in the parking lot.

STU: It barely dented the cars. Let alone the ground.

Honestly, it doesn't even look like. You know when you have a car fire, on the side of the highway. And the police -- the fire department gets there finally and puts it out. And it's just a shell of itself. It's not even that level. It looks like there was a fire nearby cars, and they didn't actually catch fire. And they're a little -- they're a little brown on the top. And a little charred. And something certainly happened there. But there is -- again, these are -- the footage from this, we should point out, came from al-Quds.

It didn't even come from the Israelis. This came from Palestinian sources. And these sources are posting these photos. I think -- I don't even know why honestly at this point, why they would do such a thing. Because it's ruining all their propaganda.

But we had the American media, go to Hamas. A group of people who just murdered and raped and decapitated thousands of people.

And said, hey. Tell us your story. About what happened. And we'll just put it on the news.

We'll take it from your mouth, and we'll make it news.

GLENN: Well, the good news is, that Biden immediately came out and said, we're going to look into it.

Immediately --

STU: He did.

GLENN: Immediately came out and said, you know, like I would as a president, said, yeah, I find that highly unlikely. But we're going to look into it.

You know, I tend to not take Hamas at face value, but we're going to look into it.

Anything like that, would be -- would probably be good.

But he didn't. In fact, he -- Kirby didn't even -- Kirby even went a shorter distance than that.

STU: Yeah. Now, Biden did seem to say, that from what he has seen, it seems like it was a rocket gone wrong.

Or something like that. He threw out some phrase like that briefly.

GLENN: A rocket gone wrong. Whose rocket?

STU: Yeah. He meant it. I think he indicated it looked like a Palestinian rocket from what he had seen. Step back from this for a 16. There's two sides to this fight.

GLENN: Is there?

STU: No. I'm saying to the fight.

There's the Israeli side. And the Hamas side. One side, the Israelis were attacked.

And had all sorts of things happen to them. They're about to try to start a ground invasion.

Now, the one way they could possibly lose, right? Is drawing a larger conflict out of this.

Because they do something so terrible to the Gazans, that the rest of the Arab world unites and starts invading them. They're not going to lose to Hamas.

They are at risk though, if something like that happens. If a larger conflict breaks out.

GLENN: Wait a minute. I want to make sure I understand. So what you're saying is, maybe if you would use critical thinking, you would say, who wins from this scenario?

STU: Right.

GLENN: The one thing Israel needs to avoid, is bombing a hospital and killing 500 people.

So at the very least, your instincts should be, well, if it was Israel, had to be a mistake.

GLENN: Correct.

STU: But instead, it was reported as an intentional bombing of a hospital.

On the other side, Hamas, who had no chance to beat Israel on a one-on-one military battle, their only chance, the only thing they want is chaos and a larger war in the area.

The thing that they want is fully supported by what they're saying. Right?

GLENN: How old-fashioned, he's using critical thinking.

Listen, here's what you need. Kirby a retired, United States Navy rear admiral. And I think he focused on the rear part of it.

He said, the proper number of civilian casualties in a conflict like this is zero.

Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. That's great. That is great. As a rear admiral, you're sure. That's why you were in the rear.

STU: Yeah. Hamas really screwed that up, didn't they? Because it's not zero because of what Hamas did.

Bought, you know what, the ideal is zero. Nirvana is a war with zero civilian casualties. It's not really realistic, is it?

GLENN: No. No. There has to be 72 virgins in some place. So there were demonstrations in Baghdad, Iraq. Istanbul, Turkey. Beirut. Amman. Dohar -- or Doha, Qatar. You know, of course, in Tehran. In Spain. In Cairo. In Yemen. In Berlin, Germany. In Greece. In Montreal, Canada. In Morocco. All last night, all last night, but don't worry about the borders.

Don't worry about looking into people here. Don't do it. Don't do it.

America, you're perfectly safe. My gosh.

This is what happens to a world. When you forget, what is important and true.

What's important to us, America?

What's important to us?

Our -- our -- our vacations? Our jobs? Our cars? Our houses? What's important to us?

And I don't mean now. I mean, over the last 40 years. What's been important to us? Who will win on American Idol?

Is that what is important to us? Because that's what we've concentrated on. We have concentrated so much on our wealth, and our way of life. That we'll just never, ever, ever go away.

That we have destroyed our children. We have allowed our country to be taken over by radicals. We have allowed our -- our higher institutions of learning to be taken over by Marxist, communist, Islamists. Atheists. Whatever they are.

They are pumping poison into our system. We have turned a blind eye, because we worshiped multiculturalism.

We worshiped everybody getting together.

You cannot come together. The United States of America cannot be united without a certain group of principles and ideas, that we all gather around.

One of those is, I don't know. I'm for life. I like life.

I hate war. If we're going to have to fight a war. It's going to be a just war. No. No. We canceled that. Obama canceled those classes.

What's just war? I don't know. You don't kill women and children. And execute them on the -- in the name of war. You don't just -- you don't just go into houses and do that. See, some of these things, they're not self-evident. They were self-evident. Back in the 1700s. Because our churches preached them. Because our churches -- shame on all churches, including mine.

For not talking about the miracle, that was the founding of this nation. The miracle that is the Bill of Rights.

Shame on you.

And shame on me.

For allowing it to happen. And sitting there, and just going, yep. Yep. Yep.

Why are we learning any of this stuff? Oh, that's okay.

Yep. Yep. Yep.

It's not okay. This is what happens. This is what happens, when you dismiss that one group of religious extremists actually mean it when they say, we are trying to wash the world in blood.

I cannot believe that we're sitting here, talking about which side is right.

When one side is literally quoting Scripture. Their Scripture.

Not yours.

Just a quick highlight.

The end of their story, is the exact opposite of the end of our story.

Okay?

Two different books. Two different endings.

You know how we always say, oh, don't worry. We know how it ends.

Yeah. If you're not reading their book.

Then it's just the opposite way.

So that would say, if I believe what I believe, they're on the dark side.

And hmm. We've been talking about it for years here.

But America just doesn't care to pay attention.

Because why? Because why?

We all just want to get along. We all just want to be able to have that one guy, who is wearing a dress, say I can have a baby.

Or that one woman, that's now wearing pants, saying, I can have a baby.

And I'm a man. Good God, America.

TV

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

RADIO

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

RADIO

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

TV

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.