RADIOMay 19, 2025

Comey’s “8647” Threat to Trump Unmasked

Former FBI Director James Comey has caused a controversy by posting a picture of seashells on a beach, arranged into the number “8647.” Many have interpreted the message as a threat against President Trump. But did Comey know that it could be interpreted as a call to “86,” or assassinate, the 47th president? Or is his claim believable that he had no idea “86” could mean something violent? Glenn started off his radio program by giving Comey the benefit of the doubt, but a comment from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard made him change his mind: “I don’t give him a break.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, maybe we as babies can figure out 8647.

Now, I don't know, Stu, if you saw the James Comey tweets yesterday.

STU: Yes, I did. Well, I mean, when you say, his tweets. He took a picture of it.

A shell formation, that he found on the beach.

GLENN: He was just walking by.

STU: And shells in the sand.

GLENN: Unbelievable!

I mean, I'm sorry. But I'm not a baby with my little innocent eyes.

There's no evidence -- we should -- there's no way that that's -- that he just stumbled across that. And he was like, oh, this is a cool sea shell formation.

I don't really know what it means. It's political of something.

So I will put it up on Instagram.

STU: That's obviously not true.

GLENN: That's what he said!

STU: Well, it kind of played it off that way. He said, oh, look what I found. Like either he did it himself, which is the most likely.

GLENN: No, no, no. But he came back.

Can somebody find the response?

Because he came back later, and reposted on it. Said, yeah. I posted early a picture of some shells, I saw today on the beach walk, which I just assumed was a political message.

I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me, but I oppose violence of any kind.

So I took the post down.

So he's saying, I just stumbled across this.

I took a picture of it.

STU: Right.

GLENN: The baby was an actual formation.

I mean, he knows somebody did it.

But I knew it had to have some political meaning.

Do you post something that you know has some political meaning?

Without saying, does anybody know what this means?

I mean, you didn't even post it, and say that.

STU: It's a very bad idea. Particularly if you happen to be the former head of the FBI.

GLENN: FBI! So he doesn't know what 86 means.

STU: Okay. We should set that up.
You know, I could walk you through this, Glenn.

As a former proud veteran of Chili's, where 86 means like you don't want cheese on the burger. That normally comes with cheese.

You're like the burger, 86 cheese.

Meaning, you killed the cheese off the burger.

Now, it also could mean, remove the choose.

I don't know that it's --

GLENN: Right. It has several --

STU: Always violent.

GLENN: It has several meanings. Eighty-six the cheese.

Which means get rid of the cheese. But it also has roots, back during the bootleg time.

Now, I've heard this story.

I looked for it. I couldn't find it anywhere.

I heard this story from somebody who was a wandering historian of New York.

And I don't remember what place it is.

But it had -- it was a bootleg club.

And during problems. And it was on a block.

And the basement went the entire city block.

Okay?

And so it was bootlegs and gambling underneath. And the cops only knew about the front entrance.

And so they would say, 86 it!

It's the cops. Which meant, the address on the other side, was 86.

So it meant, use that door!

Get out. Use that door.

Don't go through the front door. Eighty-six. It's the cops.

STU: Interesting.

GLENN: Okay?

So get out. When the soda

GLENN: And that takes on a whole different meaning today, doesn't it?

Soda jerk used to mean people in the drugstores that would pull the fountain down. And it would be called a soda jerk, and they had their own lingo. They had shoot one, draw one. They had shoot one in red.

You should know this.

If you're going up to a soda jerk. Shoot one in red. What does that mean?

STU: I don't know.

GLENN: It means, give me the Coke, but I want cherry Coke.

Shoot one in red. Okay? So they would pull the soda, and they would pour cherry soda in.

So echo was a repeat order.

And 86 meant, we're all out of it. Okay?

So it's, get out. Vacate.

We're all out, or kill the cheese.

Okay? So those are the meanings. But if I'm on the beach and I say -- and I see 8647, and I'm the former FBI director. I'm like, what does -- I know what 47 means. What does 86 mean?

STU: Of course, Trump 47 of the United States.

GLENN: Of course it does.

STU: Now, adding on to this, you're not only the FBI director, former -- you're, of course, an opponent of the president, who has been pretty clear over the years.

Also, I don't know if anyone notices. That president has almost been killed multiple times recently.

GLENN: Right.

STU: Right. So there's an added thing where you have to be really careful around this particular person, who took a bullet on stage.

And almost got killed with his golf club. Right?

GLENN: I mean, look at how delicate we are today!

And the left used to be so -- on the Kennedys with Robert F. Kennedy. Robert F. Kennedy.

I mean, I don't know if there's, you know, somebody out trying to kill him. I just assume this is a Kennedy. All Kennedys, somebody is out there to kill them.

STU: It does seem that way.

GLENN: It does seem that way, but you would never say 86 RFK. You would never -- just because we're decent people, but when it comes to Donald Trump. And I'll bet you now, with RFK too, it wouldn't be bad to say 86 RFK, in some circles.

They would be fine with killing them.

STU: Well, first of all, yes.

It's probably true in some circles. There's an entire Hamas wing of the party.

GLENN: But I mean American. American, you know, leftist circles.

They don't care. Ends justify the means.

STU: They're awful people.

I will say, it's possible, that he didn't mean that in that way.

GLENN: No. It could have been get out of 47.

STU: I want him out of office.

I'm sure, it will be his defense. I mean, one of the other things that's the new left-wing past time.

GLENN: As you're talking, I just can't. I can't look at you now. Because I always see you as a baby.

STU: I have very innocent eyes.

GLENN: I just want to gobble your cheeks up.

STU: That's why I'm eating more.

Get those cheeks up nice and plump.

The new left-wing pastime on Twitter today and on social media is to search for all of the conservatives, that did tweet, 8646 at some point during the Biden presidency.

GLENN: They weren't the former FBI director!

STU: It's a very fair point.

That's why -- I've never seen 8647.

Never seen that.

STU: I haven't seen it either. Apparently, people didn't post it during that term.

GLENN: Okay. But who are they? Look, we all have the crazy person that lives on our street.

Growing up, oh, he's the crazy Jim down the street. Kids, stay away from crazy Jim.

We all had the neighbor who was like, you know what, and I'll tell you what else is happening right now, that nobody knows. And you're like, okay.
All right.

STU: There are some conservative influencers, that just didn't like Biden. That tweeted it.

Not wanting him dead, but wanting him -- probably removed from office.

GLENN: Removed.

STU: All that being said, none of them, as you point out, were people who were the former FBI director.

Number one. None of them also were talking about a president that had almost been assassinated multiple times recently.

Right?

I mean, those two areas, I think are a massive distinction. Particularly, the first one.

I mean, even if, you know, the -- the -- someone had tried to assassinate. God forbid, we hope that they never do.

Joe Biden. When he was in office.

And you tweeted that after -- I mean, it will be insensitive. And probably a really bad idea.

GLENN: Yes. And a waste of time.

Almost redundant.

STU: Yeah. Just wait --

GLENN: He's almost.

STU: Yeah. He is -- his health isn't particularly strong, as you know.

However, beyond that, being the director of the FBI, means that you are constantly processing a stream of threats against the executive.

GLENN: Yes. Yes.

STU: And the fact that you would be in there, thinking that's appropriate. Knowing that obviously what 86 could mean. It doesn't necessarily mean that. But it could mean that.

GLENN: Honestly, when I saw it. I didn't think he meant kill him. I thought he was saying, get him out. Get him out.

That's what 86 means to me.

So cancel him, whatever.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: However, again, when you're the FBI. Former FBI director. You have a little more responsibility.

STU: It's massively irresponsible. And he should just come out and apologize for it.

GLENN: And not saying I randomly saw these shells. They washed up on the beach like that. I guess. I don't know who did it. And I thought it might be political, so I posted it.

Nobody believes that!

STU: Yeah, another thing is, if you're the former FBI director, maybe never post anything on social media.

I don't know. Do something that is supposed to be important.

I just don't understand people with this nonsense.

GLENN: When we come back. I want to tell you, Kash Patel's take on this.

And when he tweeted that, in just a second. First, Lear Capital. When you go back to 2008 and buy gold, would you? Of course you would. Of course you would.

A lot of people would. Back then, gold was over a thousand dollars an ounce. Then the meltdown came. The bailouts. The trillions in debt. And the gold, it nearly tripled in value.

Everyone has hindsight. A lot of times, it's 2020. But the question is: Do you have any foresight?

Look around, the debt is worse! The dollar is weaker. The spending is insane. The riots on the streets, all over the world are getting worse and worse and worse.

Stick some of your requirement market. Or your requirement into the market that is swinging like a pendulum.

But then make sure you that he come bet, and have some gold or silver.

Please, if you have been thinking of moving some of that gold or silver into gold, don't wait for that crisis.

It's why Lear Capital is here. They will help you understand your options. Whether that's gold IRA or physical delivery. You just, don't -- you can't go back to 2008, but you can choose wisely going forward. Please, call Lear Capital today.

At 800-957-GOLD. Get your free $4200 gold repot, and when you call, 800-957-GOLD.

Make sure you ask them about getting up to $15,000 with free gold or silver with a qualifying purchase. That's 800-957-GOLD. Lear Capital.

Ten-second station ID.
(music)

GLENN: Here's Tulsi Gabbard.

VOICE: Are you buying that the former FBI director didn't know what 86 Trump meant?

VOICE: Absolutely not, Jesse.

That is a ridiculous and insane statement to make. Certainly, within this context, but especially coming from a guy, who is the former director of the FBI.

A guy who spent most of his career prosecuting mobsters, and gangsters.

People who know and execute other humans, and use this exact lingo of 86.

This is the guy who is issuing a hit on President Trump. The president that the American people voted for.

We the American people cannot take this lightly.

Whatever your politics. We cannot allow people to get by without being held accountable, for this kind of public call to assassinate the president of the United States.

The rule of law says, people like him, who issued direct threats against the president of the United States, essentially issuing a call to assassinate him, must be held accountable under the law.

GLENN: You know, I never -- stop, stop. Stop.

You know, you know, I never -- she's not only beautiful, she talk pretty too.

I never thought of it that way.

He's a guy that has been prosecuting gangsters.

And they do say, hey, Nikki no eyes.

I think needs to be eighty-sixed, you know what I mean?

That is the language of assassination in the mob.

And this guy has spent his whole life prosecuting the mob.

I take back what I say, where I thought. He just probably thought. No!

He's at least smart enough to know, that in some circles, that does mean kill!

And you would never do that! You would never, ever, ever, ever do that.

I wouldn't. Would you?

If you knew something meant, in some powerful circles, kill that person.

STU: Of course not. Of course not.

GLENN: Right. Right. But it has innocent verbiage if you were a soda jerk.

STU: Yeah. It does. It does.

GLENN: It does. But if you're the FBI director and you're not working, prosecuting soda.

GLENN: But the people who know what 86 means. I don't -- I guess -- you know what, she's right.

I don't give him a break.

I don't give him a break.

I was giving him a break just a few minutes ago.

But I think Tulsi is right.

Will Trump HIT Iran with a “bunker buster” bomb?

Will President Trump get America involved in Israel’s war with Iran by helping drop a “bunker buster” bomb on Iran’s main nuclear facility? Would that cross a red line? Glenn Beck asks House Foreign Affairs Committee member, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who explains why she believes such debates are pointless right now. Plus, Rep. Luna addresses a 1980s CIA "playbook" that exposes a strategy to "set off riots and destabilize governments."

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Representative Anna Paulina Luna is joining us now.

Congresswoman from the great state of Florida. You guys are kicking it, down in Florida.

I mean, you really -- you're making Texas look bad, quite honestly. But thanks for coming on.

ANNA: Thanks, Glenn. I would like to say, we're leading the nation not just in politics, but also the White House. So happy to be here.

GLENN: Yeah. All right. I have to ask you a little bit, about are we going to war? What's happening? Is this negotiation? What does your gut tell you on this?

ANNA: My gut is telling me, that we're not intervening. And based on the president's statement, he is still rightfully so, urging everyone to negotiate. Right now, he's definitely been very open about this.

But I don't want to -- what I will tell you, in the last 24 to 48 hours, I have seen so much disinformation circulating on the internet. Well, a lot of it not coming from security that is in the states, so I will tell everyone. That don't jump to conclusions, don't read into anything, that senator Lindsey Graham is saying or any other members of Congress, that are speculating, that there will be direct intervention. In fact, the White House just yesterday via Alex Sipher on X posted that the military is not intervening. We're simply defending our own. And so what I will tell Americans is first and foremost, President Trump has not changed his position on foreign policies. If he wanted to strike, he would have done it by now. So everyone needs to pray for him. Pray for our country. Pray for the millions in both Iran and Israel right now, and let the process play out.

GLENN: Can you tell me, do you think it's a red line to send over a bomber with one bomb?

Is that -- does that drag us into war?

Or is that just helping?

ANNA: I would say, as of right now, we need to not speculate, but continue to back the White House's position.

Because I think if I were to speculate on where the red line is, I don't think it helps.

I do think that our allies and adversaries are looking to see the members of Congress are doing. I will back the White House's position currently. Which is defending our service members and not intervening --

GLENN: It is. I'm so glad to hear you say that. That is exactly what I just said on the air. Just about three minutes ago.

ANNA: Oh, really?

GLENN: I said, yeah. The world is watching. You don't think the mullahs aren't watching everything that is said on X. You know, we must used to have these conversations where it was global. We're now in a global atmosphere.

And they're watching all of us.

And we can't eat ourselves up. Or they will -- if he's telling the truth.

I think a good negotiator, never bluffs. And he has to back it up.

You know, 60 days. You don't want to see what happens on day 61.

He wasn't bluffing.

And if they think, that we are eating ourselves, alive, they're more likely to go, no.

You know what, go ahead. Go ahead.

It's a really bad thing.

ANNA: What I will say, it's definitely a litmus test for our country right now. You're seeing a lot of people, jumping to conclusions. What I will tell you, there's only a very select few that fully understand what's happening in the situation room.

That's the president, his team, and it's left up there to you. What I will tell you, don't read in, don't speculate. And also too don't jump to conclusions.

Again, in the last 48 hours, I went online. I put out information, because I saw so much information circulating. Something that was said by Kash Patel. His CCP has engaged in basically election engineering. We just saw that in the 2020 election cycle.

They just got busted. This also comes on the tail end of these riots that are absolutely being hunted by the CCP. Neville Singham getting lots of money from them.

And it doesn't stop there.

We saw there was an -- so what I would say is that, you know, I'm partially inclined to think some of these accounts that are attacking the president, are foreign policy positions right now.

Are coming from China. Everything that we're seeing. Three times, that they've done things.

So we have to stick together. It's not, Democrat versus Republican right now. It's America, and fighting for Western civilization.

And so we need to make sure that we're very responsible about our commentary right now.

GLENN: Very good. Very good.

Can we talk a little bit about the -- let's start with Neville Singham.

The guy is -- he is an operative for the CCP. And he is pouring tons of money. And no one in the mainstream media, wants to talk about it.

They just -- oh, that's ridiculous. No, it's not.

Can you give us some information on --

ANNA: Yeah. Of course. So it's not ridiculous. In fact, there's a lot of money -- money at least back to Neville Singham. And I actually look at credit where it's due. So I was on X. And came across this account called Data Republican, and she actually pulled the money trail right to Singham. He also lives part time in Shanghai, China, and he's not registered as a foreign agent.

And so I was able to talk to Comer, and every single member of oversight after seeing the evidence that was presented, actually sent a letter, signed off on it, not just to Neville Singham, but also, to AG Bondi to also request an investigation.

And so what I will tell you is that this should have been done during BLM in Congress back then.

It was not. This needs to be replicated moving forward with everybody else who is engaging, who is not a registered foreign agent in this country.

Also, funding riots like this. In some instances have been acts of terrorism.

And so right now, it's not just a playbook for Neville Singham. We're also -- this is also up to Comer. Because Comer has subpoena authority. Whether or not he will send his subpoena to George Soros, which I've urged him to do.

Even though, Neville Singham is a Marxist and Soros is a globalist, but their end objective is, again, to dismantle the United States.

And so we're basically being hit from both sides right now.

GLENN: I am so -- it is so refreshing.

I mean, I've been talking about this stuff for 20 years.

It's so refreshing. Finally, to have some people step up, and present this in a credible way, in Congress.

And to the -- attorney general et cetera, et cetera.

You know, you had the playbook from 1983. From the CIA.

And this is -- you know, I think it was two or three years ago.

No. It was in 2019 or 2020.

I did a special on the -- you know, the Colour Revolutions.

And how there was the CIA playbook that was out.

And it looks exactly like what is happening here in the United States. I said -- I said, at the time, here's what's coming. And it's all here.

It -- where are you taking this?

And is there anybody, that, you know, can -- can stop this?

Because this -- we are -- we're using CIA tactics on ourself.

ANNA: Well, I would say, the CCP is using this against us.

Right now, just first and foremost.

Yes. We can stop it.

We have to go after the money stream. And I actually also found out via the data Republican.

That $270 million in the USAID fund, was issued to George Soros' NGOs prior to Biden getting out of office.

President Trump can stop that, sending a letter via executive order because Congress is moving very slow.

That's I think a separate conversation.

But we can stop the money streams. And if we don't do anything, though. If we don't do the investigations.

If we don't say, you cannot do this in our country, you're also, by the way, guilty of violating foreign agent registration, the Foreign Registration app, the FAR app. It's just going to continue happening.

So we have to do the due diligence on this.

And if not, every single member of oversight signed off on that.

And to Chairman Comer's credit, he will be playing ball with Singham. So it's going to happen.
It's just, When will it happen?

So the time line, it's possibly indicated on Friday. We're waiting for a response.

He's going to be called to testify.

We are looking at all transaction records.
That's the first thing. The second thing, I want to give some people hope. I actually know Director Radcliffe over at the CIA.

And the CIA back then, remember, there's both good and bad people at the intelligence agencies.

And to their credit, the people that he has appointed, actually are a people like you and I.

And so they are doing their best to weed out this corruption at the agencies. And so what's really been brilliant in all of this.

Kash Patel is also following up on these money trails, to see what outside foreign influences are engaging in this Colour Revolution here in the United States, and he's dropping that information now. So in previous administrations, this might not have happened.

But in this one, they're stopping it, and it's because of social media and kudos to Elon Musk, that we were able to get the information in time, in regards to the No Kings protest, who is funding that.
In regards to potential insider packets that were going to frame conservatives. Frame Republicans.

We are seeing this all unfold in real time. I will tell you, Hispanic Americans, specifically, are not used as pawns. So when you have basically BLM 2.0 happening right now at these ICE riots, and you realize that these are actually largely ANTIFA that are going to be questioned. They're why they're not Hispanic. They're not immigrant.

They have no ties to the communities, and they're simply interning, you know, Mexican flags or BLM flags. That doesn't bode well in the community.

Remember, Hispanic Americans are largely voted for in favor for President trump.

So there is hope. But you can't sit on your hands. You have to get active, you have to get engaged, and you have to be telling people that.

GLENN: You know, for years, I've been angry at the billionaires on the right. That have just not stepped up to the plate.

I really, I suspected with the tides foundation and then with Biden and you all of these green new deals, and everything going on. That money was being funneled off the top.

And then as soon as we appointed DOGE. I said, oh, my gosh. The money is coming from us.

Then he started to find him. That is so critically important. Are we going to stop that funding?

ANNA: Well, yes. And so that's what we've been doing with some of these rescission packages at the White House, that has authorized. We have to move quickly. And we have to be more aggressive with it.

I will tell you, remember, I think just in general, sometimes people can be lazy.

And so what I've been telling people, is you have no idea, the level of personal sacrifice, that Elon really took on.

From taking on DOGE. Especially going after USAID. Which is just like a pot of just corrupt nonsense.

He actually just released, as we were about to call in. He released drug testing results. He had himself drug testing. Because they were saying, he was doing all this crazy stuff.

And he wasn't. Right? They've attacked companies. They literally used his personal family matters in the press. And then they tried to drag a wedge between him and the president.

So what I will tell you is, it's not just him. It's any member of Congress of the Senate. You saw what happened with the president. They tried to assassinate him twice.

Okay?

So if you take this on, the American people need to back these people up.

Because it's not like we're taking it on, because we, you know, want to have our personal lives and our family members put on the line here.

It's because it's the right thing to do. And if we don't do it, who will?

You have to really make sure, everyone sitting together. Remember, look out for the disinformation campaign.

And keep supporting people who do the right went.

Because we need more of them.

GLENN: Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna.

Congresswoman, thank you.

JEFFY: Thanks Glenn.

GLENN: You bet. We'll talk again.

The KEY to understanding Trump’s threats to Iran

Many Americans are debating whether President Trump will attack Iran and help Israel, or if he’ll keep his promise to stay out of this war. Glenn Beck explains what he believes is the key to understanding Trump’s

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I think America is all warred out. I know I am.

I'm all warred out. We've been the police. War's policemen since I've been a kid.

It's never helped us. It's never done anything, except push us towards bankruptcy, and more of our people killed.

You know, we've had Afghanistan. Iraq. Libya. And they ended for, what?

Nothing. Nothing.

What did we get out of that? Nothing!

Are we safer?

No. We're not safer. Look at our streets. Look what's coming across our border.

We have 8,000 terrorists, in our country, right now!

That didn't make us safer by any stretch of the imagination. What did we do that for?

We've also been lied to by our government, over and over and over again.

At least the last 100 years on this progressive nonsense, on the State Department, and how they want to fight wars now.

There hasn't been a real end of a real war, in how long?

Since World War II?

There's not -- are these all police actions. And they never -- they don't seem to work out.

I'm done with all of that. I think you are too. And we can't afford another war.

Now, that being said, I think Iran and I've said this since 2003, Iran is the head of the snake.

It wasn't Afghanistan.

It wasn't Iraq. You know, I thought the strategy from Bush was to take Afghanistan and Iraq and squeeze forever the government of Rand Paul.

Enough to have it topple and let the people take over, in Iran.

But that didn't -- I don't think that was even their strategy. I think that was me maybe hoping.

You know, and all the talk about the nukes in Iran, I have a hard tame. You know, weapons of mass destruction. George Bush. They weren't there.

They weren't there.

So now they have -- I mean, I've heard since, what?

Now. 2005.

Iran could be just days away from a nuclear weapon. Then once they have one, then they could produce all the -- I don't know. I've heard this since 2005. You have no credibility with me anymore, that they're just days away from a nuclear weapon!

Now, are they days away? Maybe!

I don't know.

So what do we do?

Well, I'm pretty happy with the current course.

Israel seems to be doing a bang up job.

You know, and have you noticed, it's not really causing any more problems in the streets.

In Saudi Arabia, or Egypt. Or any other place.

They all seem to be cool with what's going on.

And why is that? Because everyone in the Middle East knows this is right. What is Egypt doing? First of all, maybe we should be a little more like Egypt, you know, without the authoritarian regime. Maybe we should look at our borders the way Egypt looks at its border with the Palestinians!

You know, there's a two-story wall, all just -- I mean, it is razor wire everywhere.

Nobody is coming across that border, coming out of -- of -- of the Palestinian section, into Egypt.

They don't want them.

Strangely, neither does Jordan. Strangely, neither does the UAE. Strangely, neither does Saudi Arabia, or any other Gulf culture. They don't want them. Why?

Because revolution always follows.

Thus, let me again, bring you back to Egypt. What happened over the weekend.

All these Palestinian protesters. The kinds that are on our streets.

The Palestinians just -- I mean, the Egyptians just picked them up.

Put them on a bus. And said, get hell out of here. Or we'll throw you in jail.

We can't protest peaceful. No. Not in Egypt.

It's not America.

You're not doing that in Egypt. And one of the reasons why you're not doing that in Egypt. Egypt knows, the Palestinians, no matter where they go. They sew the he seeds of revolution.

That's been the pattern over and over and over again, when one of the Gulf states take them.

So why is that a problem for Donald Trump to do exactly what the Egyptians and the Saudis and the UAE, and everybody else is doing. Which is, hey, Israel, keep going!

I mean, I'm not going to say that out loud. But keep going.

Can we help you with anything on that one? Because don't turn around on us. We will deny it.

But go ahead. They're all doing that!

All of them! What is the other thing they're doing? They're not siding with the Palestinians. They're not letting the Palestinian, you know, revolution break out in their countries.

So why is it such a problem in our country? To do what they're doing!

Which leads me to believe, maybe, just maybe, there's a lot of anti-Semitism on this one.

I've never seen a country exercise a war this precisely as the one that Israel is doing. I mean, it's unbelievable.

It's unbelievable.

Okay. So now, let me take to you the third part of what I want you to really think about.

Are we actually preparing for war?

Because every sign says yes. And maybe we are. I don't know.

Every sign says yes. We are mobilizing.

We are moving assets in. Yesterday, I think it was the Israelis said, everybody needs to get out of Tehran. That looks like massive bombing coming there. That doesn't seem like Israel. Does it?

We're talking about maybe using one of our B52s. And the only bomb that can get into the plant, to be able to get under the mountain to take out their nuclear facilities.

We're the only ones that can do it, and we're talking about doing that. However, at the same time, Donald Trump said, no, to killing the leaders of Iran. Which were the leaders that put the plan in place for the assassination of Donald Trump.

So it doesn't seem like he's being vindictive here.

What is actually happening?

How do you make sense of the world?

May I just suggest, what do you know about Donald Trump?

What do you know at the core of his being, who he is?

You know that he is a pro-tariff guy.

You know that he hates war.

To the core.

You know that he's terrified of nuclear war.

And he's a negotiator. I don't think that's in the right order.

I think he's a negotiator first. And when you negotiate at this high level, you don't tell everyone what you're doing.

First of all, the first thing you have to do is establish credibility.

And especially in a country like Iran, where the American president has never had any credibility.

Because they say, you know what, you cross this red line. And you're done. Then they cross the red line. And they're like, okay. Well, don't cross this red line or you're done.

Then they cross that red line, and nothing happens! Okay. Well, don't cross it. Shut up with your red line. It means nothing to us anymore.

What did Donald Trump do?

He gave Iran 60 days to negotiate. Sixty days.

What happened at midnight on Day 61?

Israel unleashed hell on them.

Donald Trump said, you have 60 days. And please, get to the negotiating table. You don't want to see what happens on Day 61.

Don't do it. Don't. Don't.

I'm holding them at bay. Don't. Let's negotiate. Okay? Now he has credibility.

So now when they're talking about, you know what, what we might do. He will say, yeah. Well, I'm talked to Israel, about letting them use that bunker buster.

You know, I also think you're a really dangerous knight right now. I think, you know, put us on a war footing, would you?

Now the American people are looking at Donald Trump going, he just might do it. Are we going to war? He just might do it.

What do you think Iran is saying? Iran is saying the same thing! Oh, good God. He just told us 60 days.

He's not bluffing. He's not bluffing.

The guy does not bluff. He's nuts. He's insane.

Whatever you want to say about him. He's a negotiator. And the one thing that Iran really does not understand, I think is negotiating from the best negotiator in the world.

But I am afraid the American people don't understand that either.

Now, I could be wrong. So I'm not saying this is what's going on.

But I believe this is what's happening.

I believe he's negotiating.

And, you know, he will follow it up.

But what did he say?

As soon as the bombs went out. He said, I told them, 60 days. A, establish credibility.

Then the next statement was, please come back to the table. Or it's only going to get worse.

Okay?

Then while the whole world is watching the G7, something happens, and he flies back. He leaves the G7. And he flies back, at 3:00 a.m. He arrives, and he goes directly in to the situation room, and they're moving assets around the world.

And then says, hey. Iran, you should negotiate. You should negotiate.

We're still at the negotiation table. I would suggest you get back.

How freaked out do you think they are?

Now, here's the thing. Have you ever been in tough negotiations with somebody, and they start to say things. And you're like, wait. This wasn't part of the plan.

We didn't discuss this.

But they're the leader. What should you do? If you're in negotiations, you should be going, yeah.

Yeah. We talk about that. You know, all day long. You go out in a hallway. Or you go into another room, and you go, what are you doing?

What are you doing?

We didn't talk about this. But you never say it at the table. Never.

Because if they spot any division, that game is over. So what's happening online?

Right now, we're dividing ourselves. I think the president is negotiating. I -- I know the president hates war. I know the president hates nuclear war.

I know the president likes Israel, but he's not wanting to fight their wars.

I know the president knows how much trouble we're in, with Islamic extremism, especially the kind that comes from the Twelvers in Iran!

If I know all of those things to be true, he's negotiating. And he's hoping that Israel will do the job we won't have to.

But we can back them up by being tough negotiators. And saying, you know what, go ahead. Put us on a war footing.

Because then, their side is at the table going, what the hell, is this guy -- and somebody at the table is going, he told us 60 days. In sixty days, we were having bombs raining down on us.

He will do it!

But there's also somebody at the table that said, eh, just lost Tucker Carlson. That guy helped him get elected. Eh, just lost, you know, whoever, Sean Hannity and Mark Levin and Glenn Beck.

And they're all fighting against each other. He's not going to be able to hold his base together.

If he's -- if he's bluffing, fine. If he's not bluffing, it won't be long, because they'll tear him apart.

Now, how does that -- because you, and me, and Tucker, and Sean. And, I mean, it used to be just the big anchors, on CBS. ABC. NBC.

Now it's not just even us. It's you!

They're watching us, as we're sitting at the table. We're blinking.

Repeatedly. I -- I don't know what -- I don't know.

I have no inside information.

I just think, I know Donald Trump, and what he abhors. I know Donald Trump on what he is terrified of.

And that is nuclear war. And global war.

He knows that will be the end of us. All of us. I just don't see him as that guy.

And so I have to ask, is the world's best negotiator, now negotiating? And I believe the answer is yes. For the first time, you have a president that is a good negotiator.

Stop blinking. That doesn't mean I'm for war. It just means, stop blinking!

Glenn Beck EXPOSES the Globalist/United Nations 'Mass Migration Plot'

Why has there been a major push for mass migration of unvetted immigrants into America in recent years? Glenn Beck reveals how it all ties back to the United Nations’ conspicuously updated list of "Sustainable Development Goals." Mass migration suddenly became useful to globalists, and after four years of Joe Biden as President, we now find ourselves in a precarious position.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: The REAL Reason for the Surge in Illegal Immigration

The One REAL "Nuclear Threat" that Everyone Ignores!

Is America prepared for a serious attack that could take down the power grid and destabilize society? We sometimes take for granted that a nuclear attack is too far-fetched to really occur, but could nuclear weapons be used in an Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack? Glenn Beck breaks down the possibility and poses the question of the true preparedness of American society should such a thing actually occur.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Prepping 101: The Step-by-Step Guide to Surviving Global Chaos