RADIOFebruary 08, 2024

Gina Carano reveals why she’s SUING Disney with Elon Musk

Former ‘Star Wars’ actress Gina Carano is teaming up with Elon Musk and X to sue Disney and Lucasfilm after they trashed her name and fired her from ‘The Mandalorian.’ Gina joins Glenn to reveal how she got in contact with Musk and what her life was like after she lost her role as Cara Dune. She tells Glenn that Disney didn’t even have the courtesy to notify her first, but instead allowed mobs to go after her over false claims of ‘hate speech’: “[Disney] definitely put my life in danger.” Plus, she tells Glenn why she decided to take on Disney: “So many people have come before me and fought this battle and nobody was paying attention…it breaks my heart that they didn’t get justice.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I don't think I need to really do a long introduction. So I'm not going to. Actress, former MMA fighter, Gina Carano. How are you?

GINA: I'm good. Thank you so much for having me.

GLENN: You bet. I've got to tell you, I am so glad to see that you are standing up and fighting back against Disney and Lucasfilm for what happened to you. Can you just describe, quickly, that whole scene?

GINA: Well, quickly.

GLENN: I know. Sorry.

GINA: No. It's okay. I actually -- it was really interesting. For the longest time, for the last couple of years, I just -- you know, just distraught. Trying to rebuild my life. Running into all sorts of problems, and trying to, you know, re-create my career. And finally, you know, I was like, I had to just give it to God and say, all right. You know, you've got me in life. I'm going to keep going. And I have to let this go, and give it to you. And, you know, whatever justice I get, you know, I know you're working behind the scenes for me.

And then, it's almost as soon as I did that, I got an email from a lawyer, that was hired by Elon Musk and X to inquire about my case. And then I was just so excited, and I emailed him back, like immediately.

And, you know, we started going through all of the -- you know, I just educated them. And I sent them everything I have to date. And I have a lot more to send them. And they are wonderful. And they are just excited. And they couldn't believe -- they were kind of like dumbfounded about how this happened.

So that's the quick version.

GLENN: So you -- I mean, you've worked with everybody. Michael Douglas. Fassbender. Channing Tatum. Bill Paxton. Antonio Banderas. Robert De Niro. Ryan Reynolds.

Have you had any support from these people, or are they afraid to come out? How would you describe what you've -- your friend circle.

GINA: Well, yeah. I mean, well, that's not my friends. They're not my friends.

GLENN: Your coworkers.

GINA: They're incredible people that I've worked with.

You know, I've never had an issue with anybody. With anyone, whatsoever. You know, as far as actors go or a crew goes. Or for that matter, I did not have an issue on set, ever.

I get along with everybody. But, yes. To answer your question, there has been many people who I have worked with. And who I haven't worked with, that I have run into.

Not only just very well-known actors. But also very well-known producers. And actually people who are still working in Disney and Lucasfilm, actively, you know, have -- you know, they all have shown so much support. Everything that I've seen. Any of them.

And to be very honest, I've not had one person from this industry come up to me and say, you know, I deserved that. They're all saying the complete opposite.

So it's just been kind of mind bending that -- that Lucasfilm couldn't see that as well.

GLENN: When -- when they contacted you, I assume they contacted you with this. Or maybe they just said, oh, it's over for other reasons.

But when you found out that you were being cut out of everything. And your career was over, because of a tweet.

That was exactly the same, that your costar tweeted, except, toward the other side.

Did you point that -- I mean, you had to have gone, guys. Wait a minute. Hold it.

I mean --

GINA: Well, they didn't contact me. This is very interesting.

I think it just shows what the company was at the time, a couple years ago. They didn't even contact me to let me know they were letting me go. They didn't contact me to let me know that there was about to be paparazzi stalkers. And people waiting outside my house.

I found out all that just like everyone else did, over the internet.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

GINA: And it did. It was awful. You know, I've been trying to put on a very brave face for the last couple of years.

GLENN: It's hard.

GINA: I cannot begin to even describe. I couldn't leave my house for seven days. I was being talked. I was being harassed. They were coming up to my -- I had to keep all my blinds closed. And I had actually lost all hearing. I don't know -- it's a very interesting random thing. I lost all of the hearing. As soon as I was cancelled, my hearing got clogged. And I could only hear 5 percent.

GLENN: Was that kind of like -- this is a horrible name for it, but hysterical blindness, where you are in so much trauma, that --

GINA: It really felt like -- it really -- yeah, it really felt like that.

It felt like that, or either that, or just God put earmuffs on me.

So I really had to sit there in my head. And I really had to sit there in my head, and just go over things.

And it was quite. It was torturous, until I was finally just like, okay.

I just gave it to God. And I just, it's just -- it was just such an intense time.

And, you know, for them not to even warn me.

You know, I didn't live in a gated community. So I was out there.

And that wasn't -- you would think that somebody would have just call me and tell me, hey. Thank you for all your work and everything. And we're just no longer going to work with you.

And then they put out the statement about denigrating people off of their religious and cultural beliefs.

And I was like, this is -- I just -- it was just, at the worst time possible, they really kind of, you know -- they definitely put my life in danger, at that moment.

GLENN: So what do you hope happens with this lawsuit? I mean, I would love to see the discovery on all of the emails going back and forth, that will be nice.

GINA: Yeah. Yes. Yeah. I hope that -- I hope that this makes a change. I hope that it's -- it makes a change. In this industry.

And it makes the change in people's hearts.

The post I got fired for originally. Or what they said I got fired for.

Was never supposed to be what they -- what the media and all the media twisted into.

It was supposed to be, you know, do not demonize your neighbor. You know, we need to look at each other as human beings. Because the internet is one thing. But when you get outside, and you get around people, there's so much love and there's so much, you know -- it's not the internet. The internet is false. It's a lot of people nephew hiding behind brave ideas and false accounts. And when you get to be around people, there is -- you know, we all -- you know, all read. We are all on this earth together. And so I hope that this the outcome of this case is just to make, you know, everybody kind of be -- truly, truly inclusive industry in Hollywood. And make it that much difficult to do what was happening to me, to happen to the next person.

GLENN: Yeah. You know, it's -- I don't think people understand that, you know, it's happening to people like you. And, you know, people all over in the country, who are in visible places.

And I don't think people are really understanding.

If they do it to people like you, why would they hesitate to do it to a nobody.

And that's -- that's the scariest thing.

Is they're not coming after the nobodies. Alone.

They're coming after names like Elon Musk. Who I think they're trying to do the same thing to.

GINA: Oh, yeah. Yeah. When they try to smear him as anti-Semitic. I was like, that's exactly what they did to me. They try to smear you as all these key words. Racist, anti-Semitic, transphobe.

And, you know, it's just -- it's really, they're just trying to squash anybody who has the ability to reach people, to --

GLENN: To communicate.

GINA: Yeah. To tell them -- let's communicate. Let's think critically. Let's not just listen to what the news is telling us. And let's -- let's communicate with each other. Because we have to.

Because everything is owned now by people who want to grab more control.

GLENN: It's really crazy. I've never seen, especially with Disney.

I've never seen such a wrecking ball taken to their, you know, own corporation.

Like Disney has taken a wrecking ball to everything they own and everything that they touch. This is just horrible.

GINA: It's truly a shame, because we just grew up with Disney. And it doesn't seem like it would be that hard of a fix.

You know, it doesn't seem like, hey. You know what, my stuff here.

They're so good at telling everybody how to apologize and get on their knees and say sorry. It's like, you know, lead by example in this case. It wouldn't be hard to be like, to look at my case and be like, hey. You know what, we belong there.

Let's make it right. And, you know -- and then let's start reaching out to -- you know, really includes this -- like all -- all people. It doesn't mean that they have to follow any kind of political, you know, life. They could just really include and appreciate the fan base that they had, that has just been completely betrayed by them. So I don't understand in those meetings, how it's just not like, you know what, we did wrong. Let's face up to it.

Let's do something right here. And let's get our -- like our conservative viewers back.

It's just a no-brainer.

GLENN: Right. I don't know if they could, at this point.

Once you violated my family. I mean, beyond what they did to you. They -- you know, they're trying to teach my children principles, that I don't agree with at all.

And they lost that trust. That parents have. Oh, it's Disney. It's safe.

It's not safe. And that's going to take them a long time to recover that. And a good step forward, would be to -- to -- to correct this, with you and others that they have wronged.

So, you know, when this happened to you --

GINA: But nothing is impossible, you know.

GLENN: I know.

GINA: If they keep going down this route, they will just be considered evil. You know, I have a massive fall to, you know, rock, to push back a mountain. To get back a career. But I'm not looking at that, saying, okay. I'm at the bottom again, I'm not going to do it.

You know, we have to constantly rebuild ourselves, and so do companies.

So if they started now, they could start pushing that rock back up, instead of just tumbling -- it's just tumbling down the hill.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

Well, you are going to be -- you're going to be fine, in the end.

Especially since -- you know, when this happened, we weren't really ready as conservatives. And I don't want a bunch of conservative films. Or, you know, films about -- I just want good films. You know what I mean?

GINA: Yeah.

GLENN: And can we have them say decent things about society. And try to help us be better people.

GINA: Exactly.

GLENN: But if you look at the films now, Angel is really I think leading the way on this.

If you see some of the stuff that's coming. And I think we're right on the cusp. I started TheBlaze, you know, before -- before Amazon ask HBO were online.

We were doing digital streaming at TheBlaze. And it was a nightmare. Now, 12 years later, things are happening, to where, there is a community.

You give it another five years, and we're not going to have worry about Hollywood.

GINA: You know, and it really just breaks your heart. You know, I feel like so many people have come before me, and fought this battle. And nobody was paying attention. So I really am honored to be in a position where people are paying attention right now.

And to give respect to those people that came before me.

Those actors. And everyone trying to break down the barriers for so long.

You know, it breaks my heart, that they didn't get I couldn't wait.

And so, you know, yeah. I'm -- I feel pretty fortunate, you know, to be in the situation, to help with that.

Because, yes. In five years, it's going to be even better. And I'm excited to have just been at the beginning of this.

Just how I was at the beginning of women's mixed martial arts.

You know, part of breaking ground here. And so I really hope this case is -- I hope, I hope people pay attention to it. And blow it out of the water.

And just make sure, that we will make it easier for the next generation, and the people -- the younger people behind me.

GLENN: I have such great respect for you. Thank you so much for coming on. You're welcome here, any time. Best of luck to you.

You bet. You bet.

GINA: Thank you so much, Glenn.

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.